799 Bonus; Joseph's Magic Trick for David Whitmer (2b of 6 Jim Lucas/Jonathan Neville)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 сен 2024
- Jim Lucas & Jonathan Neville explain why they think David Whitmer's description of the translation process of Book of Mormon isn't reliable. Check out our conversation...
Check out this playlist for more info on this topic! • 798: Is David Whitmer ...
----------------------------------------------//----------------------------------------------
Buy a PRINTED TRANSCRIPT of this interview: www.amazon.com...
----------------------------------------------//----------------------------------------------
SUBSCRIBE to the Gospel Tangents RUclips Channel for non-confrontational interviews on topics like polygamy, the race and priesthood ban, Heartland or Mesoamerican Book of Mormon Geography, the Hofmann bombings and forgeries, women and priesthood, Joseph Smith, Brigham Young, and much, much more:
/ @gospeltangents
----------------------------------------------//----------------------------------------------
Gospel Tangents NEWSLETTER: gospeltangents...
----------------------------------------------//----------------------------------------------
Love it? Please DONATE to support our work: gospeltangents...
----------------------------------------------//----------------------------------------------
CHAPTERS
----------------------------------------------//----------------------------------------------
WEBSITE: gospeltangents...
FACEBOOK: / gospeltangents
PATREON: / gospeltangents
iTUNES: tinyurl.com/go...
----------------------------------------------//----------------------------------------------
Gospel Tangents is the best source for Mormon history, science, and theology.
----------------------------------------------//----------------------------------------------
Copyright © 2024, Gospel Tangents. All rights reserved.
How long have you been hanging on to this interview? Thank you for finally posting it!
iI'm about a year behind on transcripts, and I didn't know it was missing until I got the transcript for this interview done. Here is the rest of the interview: ruclips.net/video/Kl4iVSX8EJA/видео.html
I like & agree with Jim's explanation. At this time Joseph was commanded to not show the U&T or the plates. He was then using his "pet" rock and his "hat" to give some sort of demonstration on how he was translating the Book of Mormon with the U&T. I recall after Joseph quit doing his demonstrations he gave the stone to someone?
It's not a major thing, but just a correction. David Whitmer didn't live close to St Louis but on the other side of the state close to Kansas City. He lived in Richmond Missouri, less than 40 miles from the temple site in Jackson County.
St Louis is relatively close compared to Salt Lake City.
It’s very disturbing to think that the Book of Mormon came though what seems to be a Crystal ball in a magic hat….
It depends on whom you talk to. Do you feel the same way about the miracles of Moses?
@@mykljamz, why is it disturbing? There is a history in the Scriptures of using objects. Jesus used water to turn it into wine, mud to heal a blind. Urim and Thumim are also made of stones. Brother Jared found rocks and brought them to the Lord to touch. I personally do not see it as disturbing.
@@mykljamz is it any easier to believe in God at all?
So what would be the non-disturbing miraculous way the Book of Mormon should have been translated?
The miracles of Moses are very different though.