I've gone ahead and changed his birthday on the Wikipedia page. He either claimed 1777 or 1774, being either 160 or 157. He Likley claimed 1777 and that he claimed to have been 157 years old, but I just left it on there as I don't want to get complaints by people.
@billygamer0539 totally agree. This is one of the most bizarre cases. For some reason, researchers falsified the evidence of his case to try to make him younger. I don't understand it
I've gone ahead and changed his birthday on the Wikipedia page. He either claimed 1777 or 1774, being either 160 or 157. He Likley claimed 1777 and that he claimed to have been 157 years old, but I just left it on there as I don't want to get complaints by people.
This case is extremely confusing to me. I personally think he was in his 100s as well
@billygamer0539 totally agree. This is one of the most bizarre cases. For some reason, researchers falsified the evidence of his case to try to make him younger. I don't understand it