Frank Wilczek | From Quarks to Galaxies: A tour through the forefront of modern physics | Full Video
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 22 апр 2024
- Subscribe for exclusive content at lawrencekrauss.substack.com/
Learn more and support the foundation at originsproject.org/
A note from Lawrence:
I have had the privilege of working closely with Frank Wilczek for over 40 years, on and off, and we have written perhaps a dozen scientific papers together over that time. Our collaborations together were always a source of joy, and often of wonder, and I am pleased to say that a number of them had significant impact on our fields of study.
While I have had the privilege of working with many talented scientists during my career, Frank is unique. He is one of the most broadly read, deep, and creative scientists I have known. To first approximation, he has read everything in science, and one of the characteristics of our own collaborations that has been so much fun is entering an entirely new field of study and learning how much is known about it, and how that knowledge might be used in new contexts.
Frank is likely the most significant theoretical physicist of my generation, and along with Ed Witten, perhaps the intellectually most gifted. That he won the Nobel Prize for work performed as a graduate student with David Gross to develop the theory of one of the four known forces in nature is notable, but it just scratches the surface of his interests and accomplishments.
While Frank and I have appeared onstage together on numerous occasions, I was waiting for the opportunity to sit down with him for an extended period to discuss his life in science, and the areas of study that reflect the most significant developments of recent times, and the outstanding challenges in our field. It was a pleasure to be able to do so for this podcast. I hope you enjoy it as much as I did, and that it inspires your interest in the world around us.
Full Episodes Playlist:
• Ricky Gervais - The Or... 
Наука
If you cannot surround yourself with smart people in your life in-person, this is easily the next best thing, really any of the Origins Podcasts!
thanks!
Truly grateful to watch this.....Lawrence Krauss in conversation with Frank Wilczek! I hope I see more of this while I'm alive 🙂 Thank you Origin Podcast for all the work you guys do ❤
Lawrence, tomorrow Susskind has Dirac medal presentation. Get him on your show!!
He will appear in June.
4 hours well spent! Thank you.
Finally one of those episodes I'll watch over and over (Guth and Penrose episodes are the same). Grateful! Thank you!
what a great interview, truly enjoyed it
Thanks for the update info on: The Edge of Knowledge: Unsolved Mysteries of the Cosmos. Just bought it. Can't wait to read it.
Still watching but absolutely love this interview!
I will have to listen to this one again. I was tortured last night. lol, I was not for this specific discussion. I have a few friends playing pranks on me.
Thank you, Lawrence. 😊
The only guy that can keep Lawrence from interrupting and is even better at interrupting than Lawrence. LOL
Fantastic!
Fascinating conversation. enjoyed every minute of it
Beautiful dialog. I like how carefull chose words mr Frank. A great man, a great mind.
Great insights and a lot of knowledge revealed. Thanks!
lovely
You have both had tremendous influence on my scientific mind. Such an awesome podcast!
Hi, tremendous talk, just brilliant.....
What a clear mind looks like, amazing interview!!!!!
turning off the camera tracking provides a much better viewing experience for those of us who get motion sickness easily
Great talk, which of course I mostly didn't understand at all : )
Yes, “ It’s Hegal Enough For And I Here Ditto Man
What do the Twistors of Roger Penrose and the Hopf Fibrations of Eric Weinstein and the "Belt Trick" of Paul Dirac have in common?
In Spinors it takes two complete turns to get down the "rabbit hole" (Alpha Funnel 3D--->4D) to produce one twist cycle (1 Quantum unit).
Can both Matter and Energy be described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature? (A string is revealed to be a twisted cord when viewed up close.) Mass= 1/Length, with each twist cycle of the 4D Hypertube proportional to Planck’s Constant.
In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137.
1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface
137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted.
The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.)
If quarks have not been isolated and gluons have not been isolated, how do we know they are not parts of the same thing? The tentacles of an octopus and the body of an octopus are parts of the same creature.
Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the constant exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. Therefore, the gluon is a synthetic particle (zero mass, zero charge) invented to explain the Strong Force. The "Color Force" is a consequence of the XYZ orientation entanglement of the twisted tubules. The two twisted tubule entanglement of Mesons is not stable and unwinds. It takes the entanglement of three twisted tubules to produce the stable proton.
Amazing discussion. In our sea of technology,, Physics has oddly lost it's shine...at least in McAmerica. Then again, we've always used immigrant brains to advance the science.
Yep It’s Zellick in
📍2:39:39
2📍 2:44:50
To prove that quarks (subatomic particles) are more real while protons and neutrons (atomic particles) are less real, we need to establish a clear definition of what we mean by "real" and then provide evidence or logical arguments that support this claim. Let's approach this step by step.
Definition of "real":
For the purpose of this proof, we will define "real" as being more fundamental, indivisible, and closer to the underlying nature of reality.
Proof:
1. Quarks are the fundamental building blocks of matter:
- Protons and neutrons are composed of quarks. Protons consist of two up quarks and one down quark, while neutrons consist of one up quark and two down quarks.
- Quarks are not known to have any substructure; they are considered to be elementary particles.
- Therefore, quarks are more fundamental than protons and neutrons.
2. Quarks are indivisible:
- Protons and neutrons can be divided into their constituent quarks through high-energy particle collisions.
- However, there is no known way to divide quarks into smaller components. They are believed to be indivisible.
- Therefore, quarks are indivisible, while protons and neutrons are divisible.
3. Quarks are closer to the underlying nature of reality:
- The Standard Model of particle physics, which is our most comprehensive theory of the fundamental particles and forces, describes quarks as elementary particles that interact through the strong, weak, and electromagnetic forces.
- Protons and neutrons, on the other hand, are composite particles that emerge from the interactions of quarks.
- Therefore, quarks are closer to the underlying nature of reality as described by our most fundamental scientific theories.
4. Quarks exhibit more fundamental properties:
- Quarks have intrinsic properties such as color charge, flavor, and spin, which determine how they interact with each other and with other particles.
- Protons and neutrons derive their properties from the collective behavior of their constituent quarks.
- Therefore, the properties of quarks are more fundamental than those of protons and neutrons.
5. Quarks are necessary for the existence of protons and neutrons:
- Without quarks, protons and neutrons would not exist, as they are composed entirely of quarks.
- However, quarks can exist independently of protons and neutrons, as demonstrated by the existence of other hadrons such as mesons, which are composed of one quark and one antiquark.
- Therefore, quarks are necessary for the existence of protons and neutrons, but not vice versa.
Conclusion:
Based on the above arguments, we can conclude that quarks are more real than protons and neutrons. Quarks are more fundamental, indivisible, and closer to the underlying nature of reality as described by our most advanced scientific theories. They exhibit intrinsic properties that determine the behavior of composite particles like protons and neutrons, and they are necessary for the existence of these atomic particles.
It is important to note that this proof relies on our current scientific understanding of particle physics and the nature of matter. As our knowledge advances, our understanding of what is "real" may evolve. However, based on the current evidence and theories, the argument for the greater reality of quarks compared to protons and neutrons is strong.
≈ 1 rough area of the disk of the Milky Way galaxy = ((c^9/(G^2 Newton))/(Universe mass/(s^3))/40) ≈ 7×10^35 km^2
I was so sure that this was Larry David in the thumbnail ^^
If you consider information you recieve, you are already the smartest people in the room. The smartest people talk in high school-esque cliques. Something about volcanism relating to fertility. Iunno. They make what isnt hard, sound like its so esoteric.
Yummy - Thanks - cheers, Sean
مدرک دوتا کلیسا هم اهداشد 😁
🙏🙏🙏🙏💚💚💜💜
If all is Quark, is anything real?
🌹🌹🌹🌹
Our beautiful shared "i" AM will say, it's vital! For an infant daughters to be raised by strongest Heirs Hosts! Why?
frank my italian goombah
چه خوب شد که شما در آن زمان روحانیه کلیسا نشدید و مسیر علم و دانش و حقیقت جویی رو انتخاب کردید چون در آن شرایط شما رو زیارت نمیکردیم 👍
و دلیل دیگرش این است که
شما بالاترین مقام کلیسای کاتولیک را دارید وبسیار اهمیت دارد که مقام ودرجه شما در کلیسا را چه کسی بهتون ببخشه ومدرک شما رو از کدام کلیسا داده باشند 🙏🙏❤️❤️
انسانها مدرک ها را قبول دارند
اگر کسی هم اصرار داشت که مدرک کلیساتون رو نشون بدهید
😉❤️❤️
این هم معتبرترین مدرک شما ⬇️
*درک بزرگی و قدرت خداوندفقط از طریق دانش و خرد میسر است *
باتشکر و قدردانی از تمام زحمات شما در سالهای متمادی که در اموختن و آموزش دادن دانش الهی و حقیقت جویی کشیده اید چراکه حقیقت دین همان حقیقت دانش الهی است .
Brothers
Franck & David
((💚🕍✝️⛪️💚))
[بزرگان علم، بزرگان دین هستند ✋️]
lucid dreaming here we go🎉
Lawrence, Frank: sorry, the video is too long for the time I have. Wish the best for you both.
Pops besides being inspired by the Views! Remember thy shared "i" AM came with sincere conversations just for thee! Time will say, how else can ye all know foolish conversations? Keep watch!
To sit through this for close to 4 hours is like watching paint dry. WAY WAY too long.
Commercials every 6 minutes.
Ugh.
I love listening to so many intellectuals. But these two mumbling bumbling intellectualls, i just cant listen to another second. They both give me a headache. Its too bad because im sure they have something i can learn from. Just cant stand it anymore. Krauss just creeps me out and the other guy unfortunately suffers some thing i cannot even explain. I feel bad for even saying these things, but it is what it is. I’ll take Sam Harris, Christopher Hitchens and Richard Dawkins all day long before I ever listen to krauss again.
As God is my savior, even He can't save the mess that particle physics is in.