HEAVYWEIGHT tennis racket comparisons. Which one you should buy?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 7 сен 2024

Комментарии • 55

  • @samuelyau205
    @samuelyau205 Месяц назад

    👍 comparison. You have reviewed nosof rackets. What do you think of comparison Percept 100D, Pro Staff X, Gravity Pro? If possible also in terms of feel, crisps, plough through. Much thanks 🙏

  • @MrSarawap
    @MrSarawap Год назад +2

    Nice reviews!
    For Tecnifibre, I prefer T-Fight 305 over 315. It helps me hit unbelievable defensive shots and massive topspin with ease. However, I don't go for it because it is too heavy. The T-Fight 315 has nothing stands out from peers in my opinion (only the consistency).
    Never used Head Gravity before. If having a chance, I would go for the Gravity Tour due to its lower swing weight than the Pro.

  • @Javi_C
    @Javi_C Год назад

    Great comparisons! Thanks for the extensive review between all the racquets.

  • @glensansone4537
    @glensansone4537 Год назад

    What I always chuckle at in any review is when they talk about the demands of the racket. You need good footwork, good timing, you need to hit the sweet spot, which is small, etc. I would say this applies to most every racket. You get the most of of a racket when you are doing everything correctly. I would not want to play with a racket that gave me too much free anything.

  • @airmikey001
    @airmikey001 Год назад +1

    Always enjoy your very thoughtful videos and racquet feedback.
    You refer a lot to your ‘level’ of play, and I’d be interested to know what that is. Maybe 4.0 - 4.5?.. It matters a great deal when reviewing racquets so I’m just curious what your level is. Hope you don’t mind?

    • @tantennis
      @tantennis  Год назад

      Thanks! I don’t know my actual rating because we don’t have that here. But most of my viewers said I’m 4.5

  • @user-ug7ur5ou5e
    @user-ug7ur5ou5e Год назад

    Great comparison video,thanks!

  • @markbury2094
    @markbury2094 Год назад

    Great video thanks
    I just bought a gravity pro and then after Wilson released the pro staff X😓
    But I went from the blade to a gravity pro. The strongest points of my game are serve volley and slice
    I
    My weakest strokes are too soon ground strokes. With the gravity pro my ground strokes are at the level of the rest of my game it’s made a massive difference go my game

    • @tantennis
      @tantennis  Год назад

      Thanks! I also like the Gravity Pro so much.

    • @mirthandir
      @mirthandir Год назад

      @mark which blade were you using?

    • @markbury2094
      @markbury2094 Год назад

      Two generations ago
      Which I think is v6
      Lovely racket but I find gravity pro has much better repeatability (less prone to ground stroke errors). But you don’t lose much control
      So you kind of get best of both worlds

    • @mirthandir
      @mirthandir Год назад +1

      @@markbury2094 so basically New Head Gravity Pro more forgiving than your blade v6?

  • @houhouhou99
    @houhouhou99 9 месяцев назад

    Nice video!
    Could you please give me some advice about Pro Staff X (16 * 19), ISO 315 (16 * 19) and TF40 305 (16 * 19). I'm really struggling now.😂Thank you so much!

    • @tantennis
      @tantennis  9 месяцев назад

      PSX for top spin control all-court game. ISO 315 for baseline, counterpunching game. TF40 305 if you cannot handle the first two. Hahaha.

  • @jorgetirado3201
    @jorgetirado3201 Год назад

    Thank you! Great idea for a video to compare these four somewhat similar racquets. I've settled on the Shift 315 for my game, and the fact that I was able to secure two under-spec frames helps a ton - unstrung swingweight of 293 for both of them. Allows me to get the racquet head speed I need to handle it.

    • @tantennis
      @tantennis  Год назад

      Good choice! So, the strung SW is around 325-330?

    • @jorgetirado3201
      @jorgetirado3201 Год назад

      @@tantennis yeah, mostly around 328, but up to 330 with Lynx tour which is a slightly heavier string

    • @tantennis
      @tantennis  Год назад +1

      @@jorgetirado3201 that’s nice!

  • @svlagonda7417
    @svlagonda7417 Год назад

    Excellent summary

  • @ivanromero4936
    @ivanromero4936 Год назад

    Thank you for the review! I think you taped wrong the beam thickness of the Gravity Pro, as far as I know it is 20mm not 22...

    • @tantennis
      @tantennis  Год назад +2

      Yes I did type wrong. Thanks for letting me know.

  • @noppadolvashirakovit1620
    @noppadolvashirakovit1620 5 дней назад

    Tfight 315 vs solinco 16*19. Which one would you recommend for UTR 3-3.5 player krub?
    Currently enjoying ezone 98 but from time to time find it too stiff

  • @hansenshardja7815
    @hansenshardja7815 Год назад

    Please Review arm friend racket and string...thank you Mr

  • @K4R3N
    @K4R3N Год назад

    Great reviww

  • @Soul_guided
    @Soul_guided Год назад

    Hi mate, what would say about Yonex ezone tour 98 2022 against these rackets ?
    Thanks

    • @tantennis
      @tantennis  Год назад

      Hi. I haven’t played with Ezone tour 98 yet.

  • @purescum9002
    @purescum9002 Год назад

    Would you say gravity pro or pro staff x is better attacking racquet?

  • @nagordnogard2738
    @nagordnogard2738 Год назад

    How does the TF40 315 (either string pattern) fit into this?

    • @tantennis
      @tantennis  Год назад

      I think right in the middle between PSX and Tfight 315

  • @bigdaddy812
    @bigdaddy812 Год назад

    I have the 2020 gravity pro version and can serve some bombs. I’m hoping new version does not fall off…like you say.
    Update: I just tried the new gravity and it just may be the best raquet I have ever tried. OMG, I’m in love.

  • @mycomma
    @mycomma 8 месяцев назад

    Hi tan, if player with elbow issue, is psx suit to play?

    • @tantennis
      @tantennis  8 месяцев назад

      With multifilament yes possibly, with poly I don’t think so

  • @USKangaroo
    @USKangaroo Год назад

    Does pro staff 97 v14 315g have more fire power than tfight 315 iso since its swing weight is higher according to TW?

    • @tantennis
      @tantennis  Год назад

      I think it is. At least I feel it that way and my hitting partners say the same

    • @USKangaroo
      @USKangaroo Год назад

      @@tantennis Thank you. I appreciate your reply!

  • @johnnacke4134
    @johnnacke4134 Год назад

    How would the Speed Pro match up?

    • @tantennis
      @tantennis  Год назад

      I would say it sits right in the middle of PSX and Gravity Pro. Probably easiest to play with. Spin is better than Gravity but lower than PSX.

    • @tantennis
      @tantennis  Год назад

      I would say it sits right in the middle of PSX and Gravity Pro. Probably easiest to play with. Spin is better than Gravity but lower than PSX.

  • @ncrov6015
    @ncrov6015 Год назад

    I’m looking for lightweight racquet, maybe sub 295g. Can u recommend some?

    • @tantennis
      @tantennis  Год назад

      There’s a lot of options. What attributes you’re seeking for?

  • @Treyshadow
    @Treyshadow Год назад

    Good Review though I think you need to state your size as part of the review. These racquets play different with larger players. Players above 6' 1" may put the gravity pro at the bottom of the list.

    • @tantennis
      @tantennis  Год назад

      Yes you’re right. I’m 5’10”.

    • @alfonz7863
      @alfonz7863 Год назад +1

      Alexander Zverev is 6'-3". Not sure why height would affect racket type?

    • @gavinsmith8855
      @gavinsmith8855 Год назад +1

      Disagree.. I’m 6’3 and the gravity pro is my racket of choice. Height has nothing to do with it 😂

  • @bstrix7520
    @bstrix7520 Год назад

    I think the title is a rip off of AC tennis "Battle of the ..." which also compares similar rackets. I think you should find you own payoff. 😐

    • @ThanhNguyen-br1rh
      @ThanhNguyen-br1rh Год назад +2

      Dude AC tennis has excellent format on his videos but like any other great channels, he can’t cover all racquets. We as racquets enthusiasts or anyone on a racquets journey should just appreciate more contents like this instead of comparing them with each other