@amdintelxsniperx 100% the motherboard is super weird and it's got these jumpers for m.2 and sata with no instructions so I spent quite a bit of time trying to get my m.2 to work lol
My board is a x99-F8 with 4x16GB ddr4 3200mhz, same e5 2696 v3 cpu, C drive is a WD770 m.2, gpu is a AORUS gtx1080ti with waterblock, case is Thermaltake Core P8 TG, CPU cooler NZXT Elite 360, gpu cooler custom loop etc... ruclips.net/video/NCtlhMsbnPI/видео.htmlsi=j5939bQSi2HG8WQH
@RDL_Jamaican just saw the video dude, man that build is pretty mad, love the ram cooling going on there. I think maybe single cpu setup is probably better. Cool build!
So this dual cpu board is interesting.. what about, a quad version? for less than $200.00 in processors.. it's certainly tempting to try.. If nothing else I'm sure I could cook meals on it.
OI MISSIES, move over we have a new 4 point stove, it's called the xeon stove! Lol 😆 if I can get a quad cpu mobo I'd definately give it a try, should be quite fun i think
@@RestoTek well.. just picked up a Supermicro X10QBi for 100 plus shipping..I'll let you know how abysmal my results are, or how delicious the breakfast turns out!
@@RestoTek My board is a x99-F8 with 4x16GB ddr4 3200mhz, same e5 2696 v3 cpu, C drive is a WD770 m.2, gpu is a AORUS gtx1080ti with waterblock, case is Thermaltake Core P8 TG, CPU cooler NZXT Elite 360, gpu cooler custom loop etc... ruclips.net/video/NCtlhMsbnPI/видео.htmlsi=j5939bQSi2HG8WQH
sadly windows cannot utilize all the cores but thanks for the video either way :D in Linus's video he used a threadripper and it only utilized 64 threads in a game made to use CPU
Ahh that's interesting, I think at some points of the video it was hitting tdp limit aswell, I might try again with a combination of disabling hyper threading and maybe disabling some cores so it can stay up at 3.6ghz
its not windows, its a game engine limitation, that same threadripper cpu used by linus will fully utilize 100% of its total cores in a productivity scenario, gaming is vastly different, also task manager is awfully poorly configured in terms of displaying accurate information on usage and even speeds of cpu
@chippyyyy They are also correct. Windows Home only supports 64 threads. Pro/Edu edition supports up to 128, and Server/Workstation edition supports 256.
Since you asked, yes, Doom Eternal was a fluke. That's one of the only games that will use all your cores. As of 2024, most games don't use more than six cores, so single-core performance is critically important. Newer CPUs have better single-thread performance, so they'll do better in games.
100% it was interesting with doom though and your right single threaded performance will always do better in gaming, although the future for gaming is changing since I think games in the future will use more and more cores
@@RestoTek They've been saying that forever, and it keeps being more wrong than right. The average game in 2015 used four cores, and in 2024 (nine years later!), hardly any games use more than six cores. Yes, it's true that future games will tend to use more cores, but the rate at which core count utilization increases is much slower than many people realize.
Yeah it has been, I remember when the FX range of CPUs came out and it's "8 cores" would be used in all games, and even when true 8 core cpus came out still didn't happen. I guess when games transition to a new api then that might be a game changer, just windows is a bit slow to move on
@@RestoTek It's not about Windows; it's about the game engines. Unreal Engine can already use up to 64 cores, but CPU utilization requires the developers to actively tell the engines how to use each of those cores, and most of them are either too rushed or too lazy to do that. This is why it's very unlikely that games will ever progress much beyond 16 cores unless some kind of core allocation automation technology is developed.
Nice video👍 but 1 CPU is going to be faster in games because of the massive latency when you have 2 CPU. 1 Russian RUclipsr already tested 1 and 2 CPU. Massive latency with 2 cpu
@dantebg100 that's interesting and that does make sense. I suppose I could play around with say one cpu runs windows, streaming etc and the other purely on the game. I was hoping for higher scores on the productivity benchmarks, got destroyed on geekbench 😆
You'll have to play around on processor affinity when it comes to games, especially since Windows does poorly when scheduling threads in these edge cases
@Demopans5990 I recently did a video using steamOS, I might give that a try and see what the difference is, was interesting when I did it with a fx 9590
My board is a x99-F8 with 4x16GB ddr4 3200mhz, same e5 2696 v3 cpu, C drive is a WD770 m.2, gpu is a AORUS gtx1080ti with waterblock, case is Thermaltake Core P8 TG, CPU cooler NZXT Elite 360, gpu cooler custom loop etc... ruclips.net/video/NCtlhMsbnPI/видео.htmlsi=j5939bQSi2HG8WQH
![[#2024MAMA] G-DRAGON - 무제(Untitled, 2014)+POWER+HOME SWEET HOME+뱅뱅뱅+FANTASTIC BABY | Mnet 241123 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Ox29z5Nf1Uk/mqdefault.jpg)
5:15 From what I remember, nvidia GPUs use a software scheduler. The top frequency of the Xeon could be the reason for the low GPU utilization.
the board is the issue . dual channel ram plus those boards are weird so im betting thats why it cant see more then 16
@amdintelxsniperx 100% the motherboard is super weird and it's got these jumpers for m.2 and sata with no instructions so I spent quite a bit of time trying to get my m.2 to work lol
My board is a x99-F8 with 4x16GB ddr4 3200mhz, same e5 2696 v3 cpu, C drive is a WD770 m.2, gpu is a AORUS gtx1080ti with waterblock, case is Thermaltake Core P8 TG, CPU cooler NZXT Elite 360, gpu cooler custom loop etc...
ruclips.net/video/NCtlhMsbnPI/видео.htmlsi=j5939bQSi2HG8WQH
@RDL_Jamaican just saw the video dude, man that build is pretty mad, love the ram cooling going on there. I think maybe single cpu setup is probably better. Cool build!
So this dual cpu board is interesting.. what about, a quad version? for less than $200.00 in processors.. it's certainly tempting to try.. If nothing else I'm sure I could cook meals on it.
OI MISSIES, move over we have a new 4 point stove, it's called the xeon stove! Lol 😆 if I can get a quad cpu mobo I'd definately give it a try, should be quite fun i think
@@RestoTek well.. just picked up a Supermicro X10QBi for 100 plus shipping..I'll let you know how abysmal my results are, or how delicious the breakfast turns out!
@everyoneinhere thanks for the tip lol, I'm gonna have to give it a try 😅
@@RestoTek My board is a x99-F8 with 4x16GB ddr4 3200mhz, same e5 2696 v3 cpu, C drive is a WD770 m.2, gpu is a AORUS gtx1080ti with waterblock, case is Thermaltake Core P8 TG, CPU cooler NZXT Elite 360, gpu cooler custom loop etc...
ruclips.net/video/NCtlhMsbnPI/видео.htmlsi=j5939bQSi2HG8WQH
Try Doom 2016 on a "fast" P4 cpu (3.2ghz 2mb cache or faster) and your 3080ti using Vulcan. You will be surprised how playable it is.
Yeah it's amazing, I know that api is old now but it's still super effective!
sadly windows cannot utilize all the cores but thanks for the video either way :D
in Linus's video he used a threadripper and it only utilized 64 threads in a game made to use CPU
Ahh that's interesting, I think at some points of the video it was hitting tdp limit aswell, I might try again with a combination of disabling hyper threading and maybe disabling some cores so it can stay up at 3.6ghz
its not windows, its a game engine limitation, that same threadripper cpu used by linus will fully utilize 100% of its total cores in a productivity scenario, gaming is vastly different, also task manager is awfully poorly configured in terms of displaying accurate information on usage and even speeds of cpu
@@chippyyyy That could be a reason too but if I somehow ever get my hands on this CPU I am releasing benchmarks using Linux
@@potatocrispychip i would love to see that since not really anyone does it
@chippyyyy They are also correct. Windows Home only supports 64 threads. Pro/Edu edition supports up to 128, and Server/Workstation edition supports 256.
Since you asked, yes, Doom Eternal was a fluke. That's one of the only games that will use all your cores. As of 2024, most games don't use more than six cores, so single-core performance is critically important. Newer CPUs have better single-thread performance, so they'll do better in games.
100% it was interesting with doom though and your right single threaded performance will always do better in gaming, although the future for gaming is changing since I think games in the future will use more and more cores
@@RestoTek They've been saying that forever, and it keeps being more wrong than right. The average game in 2015 used four cores, and in 2024 (nine years later!), hardly any games use more than six cores. Yes, it's true that future games will tend to use more cores, but the rate at which core count utilization increases is much slower than many people realize.
Yeah it has been, I remember when the FX range of CPUs came out and it's "8 cores" would be used in all games, and even when true 8 core cpus came out still didn't happen. I guess when games transition to a new api then that might be a game changer, just windows is a bit slow to move on
@@RestoTek It's not about Windows; it's about the game engines. Unreal Engine can already use up to 64 cores, but CPU utilization requires the developers to actively tell the engines how to use each of those cores, and most of them are either too rushed or too lazy to do that. This is why it's very unlikely that games will ever progress much beyond 16 cores unless some kind of core allocation automation technology is developed.
cpu/ram bottlenecked 5:10
Nice video👍 but 1 CPU is going to be faster in games because of the massive latency when you have 2 CPU. 1 Russian RUclipsr already tested 1 and 2 CPU.
Massive latency with 2 cpu
@dantebg100 that's interesting and that does make sense. I suppose I could play around with say one cpu runs windows, streaming etc and the other purely on the game. I was hoping for higher scores on the productivity benchmarks, got destroyed on geekbench 😆
You'll have to play around on processor affinity when it comes to games, especially since Windows does poorly when scheduling threads in these edge cases
@Demopans5990 I recently did a video using steamOS, I might give that a try and see what the difference is, was interesting when I did it with a fx 9590
My board is a x99-F8 with 4x16GB ddr4 3200mhz, same e5 2696 v3 cpu, C drive is a WD770 m.2, gpu is a AORUS gtx1080ti with waterblock, case is Thermaltake Core P8 TG, CPU cooler NZXT Elite 360, gpu cooler custom loop etc...
ruclips.net/video/NCtlhMsbnPI/видео.htmlsi=j5939bQSi2HG8WQH