Assault Weapons Ban Struck Down...Sort Of
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 20 окт 2024
- A judge has struck down New Jersey's assault weapons ban...sort of.
Tip Jar! streamelements...
Join this channel:
/ @libertydoll
Email list: eepurl.com/gFw2Kz
------------------------------------------
SUPPORT
-------------------------------------------
Patreon: / libertydoll
SubscribeStar: www.subscribes...
Merch: www.theliberty...
--------------------------------------------
AFFILIATES & DEALS
--------------------------------------------
Blackout Coffee Company: www.blackoutcof...
PSA, Cabellas, and other partners: www.theliberty...
Valley Food Storage: alnk.to/5Q28r2S
Acre Gold: lddy.no/143ls
ExpressVPN - 3 months free!: go.expressvpn....
My Patriot Supply: www.preparewith...
MIRA Safety: alnk.to/gzNuDGT
BulletSafe bulletproof & tactical vests: alnk.to/2uySati
Libertarian Country: www.libertaria...
Liberty Classroom: libertyclassro...
MyMedic: bit.ly/2lHw1BO
Recommended books, equipment, and more: www.amazon.com...
--------------------------------------------
OTHER PLATFORMS
---------------------------------------------
Odysee: odysee.com/@Li...
LBRY: lbry.tv/@Liber...
Bitchute: www.bitchute.c...
Gunstreamer: gunstreamer.co...
Minds: www.minds.com/...
Rumble: rumble.com/use...
Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook: @thelibertydoll
Business inquiries & general hullabaloo: liberty@thelibertydoll.com
Tyrants be tyranting.The 1830 ban on Bowie knives violates the 2A. It has NOTHING to do with which weapons existed or didn't! They are ARMS. "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED"! YOU (the government) has NO SAY!
this is like saying Kleenex is allowed, but tissues are not
@@williamfoster2681IMHO, you, good sir, have won the Internet today.
Just another reason that judges that ignore SCOTUS precedent need to removed from the bench.
These judges lack of knowledge about firearms that they adjudicate on is proof positive that we live in clown world.
One would think , if they don't know shite about the topic of a case they should pass the case on to a judge that knows about the topic of the case ..
@@billdubois56 Both of you seem to be assuming this judge wanted to make an honest ruling.
My take, given my extremely limited knowledge of the courts and how they work, is that this judge did everything he thought he could to uphold as much of the state's law as possible. Reading the ruling shows that it is an exercise in mental and legal gymnastics.
They only have to understand the English language, the law and the concept of logic to rule correctly.
🎯 missed it by 🤏 this much.
Most judges don't care to know because they are leftists. Yes even many of Bush's judges... We need more Trump judges.
Why...WHY, do we ALWAYS have to deal with a damn "SORT OF"?! Grrr!
too keep your eyes off the royal screwing they are really doing to you and your kids and their kids
Capacity limitations = infringement. Bottom line.
This is one of the many reasons the new MA law should never have been passed, the fact that many provisions are still moving through courts in many states and jurisdictions.
@@warrenharrison9490 that's why they do it. There is no legal precedent, yet, so they infringe while they have the opportunity.
MA politicians simply don’t care for their constituents. When they tried to pass HD4420 there was so much backlash they had to back down. So this go around they released the bill the night before legislatures voted on it so there wouldn’t be resistance since no one knew about it
@@johannscvthey keep infringing because the supreme courts hasn’t held them in contempt
No, your honor. The US Government did issue the 1779 Girandoni air rifle with its 20/21 round magazine to CPTs Lewis and Clark in 1804-1806!
Can always count on you, LD, for details and clarity. This ruling is BS.
Shall not be infinged means NO LIMITS!
No criminal anywhere in Massachusetts (any state) will be effected by any part of a gun control bill, maybe politicians should write a crime control bill and leave the rest of us alone?
Actually the 10 round magazine rule comes from the United Nations play book standard! The United Nations compelled it and the Anti-2nd Amendment states were more than happy to implement it!!!
Good evening Miss Liberty! Thank you, Ma’am, for the effort you put forth bringing us the truth, with the great dedication that you do. We all appreciate you. 🇺🇸
The SCOTUS needs to rule against all gun control laws without any need for years long lawsuits to keep being appealed to higher and higher Courts until it reaches the SCOTUS..
Time to make the government fear the people.
Out of NY and Comifornia why this doesn't surprise anyone 😮
In the liberal urban areas of our nation, you will find yourself knee deep in bull shit - but not the kind you need to grow something.
Judge needs to go back to school and learn what infringe means.
Apparently the issue is the right of having the tools to defend yourself against attacks on your home is a problem for the judiciary in Massachusetts
It's not even just that, the second amendment was made to prevent the government from taking your first and all your amendments
Apparently Judge Peter J. Sheridan isn't familiar with the dictionary. When I look up infringement, the second definition is "the action of limiting or undermining something" (Oxford Languages, per Google). Thus, his finding on LCMs where he states "the reduction of capacity is a limitation on firearms ownership"actually equates to "the reduction of capacity is an infringement on the right to keep and bear arms." Now he can go back and read the plain text of the Second Amendment. What a buffoon.
Multi-barreled muskets and pistols are the "historical analogue" for "large capacity" magazines. I could see it now, the anti-gunners of 1770-80s saying "Who needs more than one round?!"
lever action magazines were not limited to 10 rounds in pistol cartridge carbines such as the winchester 92.
@@CGT80You would need a firearm that dates back to 1791 time frame which the Chamber Flintlock happens to be one firearm that had multiple barrels and it was a Flintlock machine gun!! This judge is stupid on firearms technology and doesn't know what firearms was around in 1791.
There was also the 1779 Girandoni air rifle with its 20/21 rd magazines that US Army CPTs Lewis and Clark used in 1804-1806!
The Girandoni air rifle from the late 1700s that was used by the Austrian military and considered by the Continental Army absolutely had an internal magazine and had quick reload magazines. Maybe judges should do a little research before making decisions.
All semi-automatic rifle bands are unconstitutional, as well as a magazine.Ten limit limit is unconstitutional.
All arms bans are anti-Constitutional
That judge should be removed from the bench.
I'm glad I live in a Free Red State where there are NO RESTRICTIONS on what I can own, including NFA firearms. South Carolina.
Same said for Texas. Every time I see one of these videos, I am very thankful for living in Texas.
@@Nate-R89Not so free state because like me in GA we all still have state laws saying we must have a federal tax stamp our states need to shut up about that remove that law and if the Feds wants to enforce federal law than have federal agents do it not the states helping them . Its illegal under Ga state statue and state crime to have NFA items without a tax stamp.
The NFA was just done INCORRECTLY!!!
thanks to FPC
I don't get why 3 10 round magazines are any different from a 30 round magazine.
The problem with that ammo plan is it tracks our ammo
It's quite infuriating how our judicial system doesn't seem to know what "shall not be infringed means", including SCOTUS. "Common use firearms" is not a term that should exist. All arms are protected by the 2A.
Excuse me but didn't Lewis and Clark take a 30-shot air rifle with them to the Pacific Coast back in the day? A .46-caliber Girandoni Repeating Air Rifle Feed system 20/21 round magazine or hopper.
It was an absolute abomination of decision…
There’s ALWAYS a “sort of” isn’t there. Sigh.
Great Report. Thank You. LD
ARs tend to use fair size mags, that's like saying your left hand is legal but your right hand is not.
Congrats 🎊🎉 on 300K Liberty Doll!!
With Chevron being ruled unconstitutional, all ArmaLite Rifles should now be legal in New Jersey. The magazine capacity should also be returned to the standard 30 because it is military "regulations."
I am pretty sure New Jersey’s laws will still hold up.
@@emberfist8347 Probably considering how much NJ state courts adhere to the Democrats platform.
Liberty Doll does a beautiful job of explaining a confusing decision by that judge.
😊
I bet Colt is thrilled about the inevitable incoming lawsuits. In the meantime, we should see about preventing sophists from becoming lawyers and judges.
i wish these judges would look up the definition of "infringe".
Mags are akin to the muzzle loader at the introduction of The 2ND Amendment in that BOTH are/were state of the art.
Tards STILL in charge!!!
A federal judge just stuck it up our you know what with a smile. His ruling was worthless!!!! I live in NJ and could buy a AR-15 all day long. Barrel had to be pinned and stock could not be adjustable. Now I can buy a colt! This did nothing for us and the judge knew it!!!!!
I am from NJ. If it isn't a Colt AR15, you could already own it.
The only change is that a colt roll mark on your receiver is legal.
Previously, only the target match Colt AR15 was exempted in NJ's ban.
Not surprised the mags are still banned, most of New England have bans on LCM’s.
Here's my take.
I don't like or agree with the mag ban, but, the judge gave a well thought out and detailed decision.
Therefore, if/when this gets overturned at a higher court, it will obliterate future bans. You'll thank this judge for being so thorough because he ticked all the boxes in one fell swoop.
Thanks for keeping an 👁 on it!
"Large capacity magazines" hold more rounds than what the firearm was originally designed to use. AR15 was 30 rounds, AK was 30 rounds, many pistols were up to 18 rounds.
So for the AR, anything OVER 30 rounds is a "Large Capacity Magazine", and for pistols more than 18 rounds is a "Large Capacity Magazine". (The 30 round Glock Magazine:)
This exactly! Instead, they are trying to ban Standard Capacity magazines. 🤬
@@seanhoudetechnically the 20 round mag of the AR-15 came first but still is a infringement.
So, if someone has a Bushmaster or a Smith & Wesson MSR built to AR-15 specs, it's still banned in NJ? Hate is a powerful emotion! Especially when combined with ignorance.
There's a RUclips video with a sheriff who did an experiment with mag capacity and found that limiting them had minimal effect. But since you probably don't want to be carrying 50 magazines with you on a day-to-day basis for self-defense Mac capacity is definitely important in this case
only in the Garden State where we are turning farmland into warehouses
Nah, were doing that here in Virginia, too.
Sounds like a word-salad.
Everything in this state is a word salad. The state ag platkin already filed for an appeal but wants more than the 30 days to come up with some bullshit
In a way, it is good that these lawmakeers and judges don't know what they are talking about. That makes a lot of these rulings ambiguous and enables us to find loopholes or workarounds.
Thanks, Liberty Doll.
Buy back these nuts Hawk Tuah Harris.
😂 lol like it
Old term; Gun control bill. New term; Take us to court again.
25-30 round magazines are standard capacity. The original version was developed with 25 round magazines. This judge is a Fudd. Thanks Bush.
You mentioned in a video a while back... about people screen shotting ? What video was that ? I try not to miss your videos. You are greatly appreciated. I hope you always kick ass for America !!
@user-ef1wb6bt8h It was primarily in jest. She said that because the last time she cupped her breasts for a video woman and gun rights, as a bit of levity, people would probably flock to that video as well and screenshot her doing it. Lol. She was just being her usual snarky self.
That's a very pretzel looking judge.
My mag identifies as a tea cozy.
As a Sooon to be leaving the state of NJ resident. I recommend MOVING! I would also recommend to those not willing to move, to keep the 40 rounders in a safe. And keep the 10 rounders in your AR while your out in public.
The "in common use" wording is flawed. It allows for any future firearm technology or designs to be banned promptly before they have a chance to be "common".
Then why is it banned in Illinois
If this "Judge" is so contrarian in this decision, IMO he should not be on the bench at all.
This is a never-ending dog and pony show... 😮💨
And around and around we go. Like hamsters on a wheel. Its almost as if they purposefully want to keep everything in purgatory.
I wonder if a magazine "limitation" is in any way an "infringement"? If not, what is the difference between infringement and limitation?
By far, he best video I've seen on the subject
This rulling is BS
Baby steps... ugh
Will the supreme court take down MA's semi auto ban?
Fine my rattlesnake identifies as a horse. 😂😂
Another informative video. KEEP EXPOSING THE SWAMP!!
1927 is NOT the Founding Era therefore does not hold up to the Bruen test.
So what the magazine ban is illegal at any rate, because they cannot pass a law that does not apply to police, federal agents, or military. Yet not a singal attorney has stepped forward on this !
So when they enacted "AR-15" bans, they must not apply to my MR556 cause its a completely different brand...
Or my Remington R-15, since it doesn’t have the A in the nomenclature. 👍🏼
I was hoping this was for MA...
Given the disdain with which this judge held the Bruen decision, I don't think it's in any way unreasonable to maintain that he wrote his decision to apply as narrowly as he possibly could. And saying that LCMs weren't invented at the time of the 2nd Amendment is something that SCOTUS, for one, will destroy when/if the case gets to them - Caetano proves that without a doubt.
But the WWII M1 carbine is still a banned rifle.
Sorry, but standard capacity mags are also in "common" use, and can't be banned. Period. Overturned.
Next, 10 cheeto bags.
Lets just rename everything and call mags. Ammo devices
Infringement IS limitation! The Constitution explicitly forbids the infringement of bearing arms. This judge apparently does NOT comprehend basic English.
Just got a notice.
Thanks DOLL
All the information online about this ruling is based on a misunderstanding of New Jersey’s assault weapons ban by people from out of state. Separate from the features ban, there is a specific provision that completely bans possession of _only_ Colt AR-15s and any other “substantially identical” firearm.
Now, someone with a brain would think that “substantially identical” means any other AR platform firearm, but you would be wrong because NJ is that regarded. In practice, that clause only applies to other ARs with the name “AR-15” stamped on the receiver. If it does not say “AR-15” on the gun, then it only needs to fit within the laid out features.
The judge knowing about that part of the law, specifically tailored his ruling to _only apply to that categorical ban_ and to not affect the features ban. *THIS RULING CHANGES NOTHING EXCEPT MAKING IT LEGAL TO HAVE A LOWER THAT SAYS “AR-15” ON IT*
Republican or Democrat really doesn't matter that much: both will limit your rights when it serves their purpose. So judges appointed by either party don't really matter either. At the moment, Republicans favor gun rights because it gets them votes.
That’s why being an independent voter has more bite.
Any updates to the law should be to clear up language on allowing more, not less. 2A was written to give citizens the same equipment as the government. These are the issues people are not understanding, and the people who are able to work to fix it are not caring.
Another great video!!!
This one was hard to get through, I'm gonna be honest. I had to pause at every moment Liberty Doll read that Judge's opinions and the current headache i'm experiencing can only be described as brain cell damage.
The LCM ban is really dumb. One can carry 3 10 round mags to equal 1 30 round mag not reducing the lethality just like a mass shooter using a lever action rifle with 7 round tube if the shooter just manually feeds the gun once after every shot especially in a gun free zone where victims have to wait for the police to arrive the only ones who can take on the shooter it doesn’t really matter mag capacity or type of weapon used.
NRA NRA NRA NRA
Great analysis i found it most useful
So, the "Colt AR-15" has been removed from the list.
Fine and dandy, except that the last nre Colt that I bought, was stamped "M-4 Carbine": was that femoved from the list as well, or only the AR-15?
I don't believe Colt even produces "AR-15"'s anymore, so if that is the only designation exempted, then the people of New Jersey are still screwed.
An AR is an AR regardless of brand
But its New Jersey....?!
Everyone better wake up .
The whole system is a facade.
They hadn't gotten past 6th grade when they did it
Does this change anything to the guidelines of What NJ says to be compliant for semi auto AR?
Limits are infringement