CLOSE CALL | pilot Takes off without Permission
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 10 апр 2024
- Audio source Liveatc.net
if you like our contents please SUBSCRIBE to our channel
/ @flight_follower
All videos are licensed under Creative Commons or used under YT quidelines of 'Fair Use'i do not own or claim any video. credits goes to respective owners. if you have your videos used and want to make a change email me. so that we can solve the issue.
• CLOSE CALL | pilot Tak...
Our email
Contact.flightfollower@gmail.com - Кино
Atc instruction was clear in the first video
Yes
Wow, didn’t expect an ATC can be so polite. The pilots were reckless.
Salute to this ATC controller 🫡
It's called professionalism, what does it help to get angry and yell at people?
“Reckless” is a bit much…..To error is human to forgive divine.
@@hawkpilot01 Well if you like your pilots to take off without clearance, then have a nice day
They never had takeoff clearance!
Yeah. Still the pilot has confusions
Sooooo many takeoff roles after a line up and wait instruction. Only thing I can think of is just muscle memory. Once on the runway the pilot just starts the takeoff process without thinking.
ATC was way too apologetic. She was correct and clear from the start.
Absolutely 👍 the instructions was clear
She's exactly how she should be. You don't want your pilot to be flustered and thinking about the future of their career as they're taxiing back for takeoff. Save the discipline and reprimands for after parking.
Nothing wrong with being nice. ATC is there to help keep planes safe. There doesnt always have to be a knee jerk aggressive response to possible pilot deviations.
Ouch.
As a pilot, hearing anything similar to "Advise when ready to copy this phone number" isn't good.
Yeah 🥲
Didnt VASaviation do this one about 4 years ago?
I see so many of these on channels such as this. I think the FAA needs to ditch the ability for controllers to issue a "line up and wait" command. Just hold em short of the runway until cleared for take off.
12-year-old Endeavour pilot?
I felt the same way to be honest! 😃
I think each video title should match the video in it... but pretty often there are multiple videos, and the title only matches one of them on this channel. eg is this Hayward the one in California? I don't think it's in Cincinnati. Could you split these videos and provide proper titles for them? Or just title it "5 minutes of aviation" and make compilations like the "3 minutes of aviation" channel?
Do you want us to make three separate videos? Otherwise its difficult to use a single title that matches all the videos
Thanks for your suggestions
@@Flight_Follower yes I think three videos with accurate titles is better
Our experience shows vague titles like “5 minutes of aviation” are not generally accepted by our audience and so the CTR goes downhill.. which is a dilemma because we totally understand your logic and we kinda feel it too
Let me be honest here.. a 5-6 minutes long video has greater chance of getting more impressions than a 2-3 minutes long videos.. but we will definitely keep your suggestions in mind.. you can try some of our other videos which are 11-12 minutes long with just one video clip (incident)
I appreciate your honesty, though I believe that should be the default and not need to be explicitly stated. It seems this comes down to doing the right thing vs doing what gets clicks. I don't stand for your position, but I do understand it.