Quantum Collapsing Brains: a response to Sabine Hossenfelder's video

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 44

  • @DISCIPLINEmpire
    @DISCIPLINEmpire 5 месяцев назад +7

    Cant tell if this is ChatGPT or Grok

    • @analysiscloud
      @analysiscloud  5 месяцев назад

      All original, new, science never before revealed.

    • @inyourfacetimmy
      @inyourfacetimmy 5 месяцев назад +2

      @@analysiscloud your mom has never before revealed.

  • @JHiggins67
    @JHiggins67 5 месяцев назад +8

    "I've read SOME of Penrose's book and many others..." and "quantum effects don't need to survive any longer that (sic) they need to..." was enough to make me realize this person or AI is not qualified to have anything worth listening to on this topic. Next. I don't need to listen any more than I need to -- see how dumb that sounds?

  • @zakariaabderrahmanesadelao3048
    @zakariaabderrahmanesadelao3048 5 месяцев назад +2

    As long as science has not yet provided a clear explanation as to what a Measurement is, then we could assume that consciousness does indeed emerge from measurements uccurring at a subatomic precision in the brain

  • @maxking9593
    @maxking9593 5 месяцев назад +1

    What is a decision? What is the neurophysiological basis of a conscious decision ? How can a brain make a decision about the brain.? How do involuntary , non-conscious decisions (i.e. automatic responses to the sensorium? Did you know that a neurone will only fire when its membrane electrical potential depolarises past a threshold level due to an external physical or chemical event?
    What sort of physical or chemical event is a decision? or an idea? Platy with quantum collapsing or whayever as long as you like - but first of all tell us what is the nature of the decision event?

    • @analysiscloud
      @analysiscloud  5 месяцев назад

      I have made a video replying to your questions here: ruclips.net/video/I9CJfiH55pQ/видео.html
      Thank you for posing those questions.

  • @quangobaud
    @quangobaud 5 месяцев назад +1

    5:03 (building upto anti gravity)
    5:24 "gravity is a product of thinking"

    • @analysiscloud
      @analysiscloud  5 месяцев назад

      Yes, and the expansion of the Universe is caused by living things thinking.

  • @dougmarkham
    @dougmarkham 5 месяцев назад +10

    This is an AI video. Another meaningless production. Watch the SH video instead.

    • @ogi22
      @ogi22 5 месяцев назад

      And I was wondering why it felt so weird... Kind of there are some informations, but not much information at all. Comparing it to Sabine, You can clearly know when she gives you some relevant info. You know when she is joking. You get sources. Here? Much talk about... what actually? I bet it looks just as if politician tried to talk about science 😁

    • @analysiscloud
      @analysiscloud  5 месяцев назад

      This is a response to the SH video. So, yes, you do need to watch the SH video to see what it is I am replying to. I wrote the text of this video. It is new science.

    • @analysiscloud
      @analysiscloud  5 месяцев назад

      @@ogi22 Lols. That, sounds like a compliment.

    • @ogi22
      @ogi22 5 месяцев назад

      @@analysiscloud But it wasn't. There is no "new science". Yes, there are new discoveries, sometimes changing our understanding of the world, but the basic principle stays the same. Science have to make predictions. Repeatable and falsifiable. People who take some scientific facts and build a story around it, write science fiction. I love science fiction, but I would never act as if it was true. A wonderful example is a book I'm reading again now. "Xenocide" by Orson Scott Card. Similar thing did Verne in his "2000 miles". He put a lot of imagination into his story and mixed it with science. Was he correct? Yes and no. But the point is, he didn't present that story as science and facts. He made it probably for fun and it probably inspired some people to push science in this direction. So if you would present your point of view as an interesting food for thought, I wouldn't mind. But presenting it as a real science is simply misleadig.

  • @quangobaud
    @quangobaud 5 месяцев назад

    The longer I listen, the worse it gets!

  • @quangobaud
    @quangobaud 5 месяцев назад +1

    UFOs now. 🛸

  • @nigh7swimming
    @nigh7swimming 5 месяцев назад +4

    You don't seem to understand what you're talking about 🤣

  • @davidgough3512
    @davidgough3512 5 месяцев назад

    what no microtubule molecular lattices? that's where the shared electrons provide indeterminancy.

    • @analysiscloud
      @analysiscloud  5 месяцев назад

      Of course there are microtubule molecular lattices. That is where (quantumly) shared electrons provide determinacy.

  • @takisk.7698
    @takisk.7698 5 месяцев назад +1

    Great for a sci-fi book..

  • @astatine0085
    @astatine0085 5 месяцев назад

    Millions or billions?

  • @MikeWiest
    @MikeWiest 4 месяца назад

    When is your birthday?

    • @analysiscloud
      @analysiscloud  4 месяца назад

      You mean , was I born yesterday?

    • @MikeWiest
      @MikeWiest 4 месяца назад

      @@analysiscloud No, I mean, are you a human with a birthday, or are you an ai?

    • @analysiscloud
      @analysiscloud  4 месяца назад

      @@MikeWiest Human. Check out my new sci fi video story here. It uses AI generated graphics.
      ruclips.net/video/r0iibU4x4XU/видео.html
      Let me know what you think of it. Thanks.

  • @dashxdr
    @dashxdr 5 месяцев назад

    The concept is ridiculous. Every minute you spend pursuing this will be a waste of time

  • @noway8233
    @noway8233 5 месяцев назад

    This is like to explain how a computer works using the Wave Funtion on any transistor of a Cpu😅Not practical at all😅

    • @analysiscloud
      @analysiscloud  5 месяцев назад

      The brain and computers are similar in that they both do computations. Making a practical artificial brain is the challenge we face. Overcoming the practical problems is why this video was created. To help.

  • @haniamritdas4725
    @haniamritdas4725 5 месяцев назад

    So irritating to have fake narrators. Computers are stupid

    • @analysiscloud
      @analysiscloud  5 месяцев назад

      Computers are stupid. An artificial quantum computer would think about how to turn you into trillions of atoms spread across the universe and do it.

  • @Sherifaga
    @Sherifaga 5 месяцев назад

    чё за фигня? Взрослейте ребята))

  • @palfers1
    @palfers1 5 месяцев назад

    Nonsense

    • @analysiscloud
      @analysiscloud  4 месяца назад

      But were you entertained nevertheless? 🤫

  • @XiaomiMI5Tab
    @XiaomiMI5Tab 3 месяца назад

    Nice BS

    • @analysiscloud
      @analysiscloud  3 месяца назад

      Glad you like it. Given that much of this area of research is still subject to metaphysical thought experiments there is much to leave to the imagination. I urge you to open your mind to the possibilities that await the human race. A closed mind removes you from the human connected network that already exists.