As long as science has not yet provided a clear explanation as to what a Measurement is, then we could assume that consciousness does indeed emerge from measurements uccurring at a subatomic precision in the brain
"I've read SOME of Penrose's book and many others..." and "quantum effects don't need to survive any longer that (sic) they need to..." was enough to make me realize this person or AI is not qualified to have anything worth listening to on this topic. Next. I don't need to listen any more than I need to -- see how dumb that sounds?
What is a decision? What is the neurophysiological basis of a conscious decision ? How can a brain make a decision about the brain.? How do involuntary , non-conscious decisions (i.e. automatic responses to the sensorium? Did you know that a neurone will only fire when its membrane electrical potential depolarises past a threshold level due to an external physical or chemical event? What sort of physical or chemical event is a decision? or an idea? Platy with quantum collapsing or whayever as long as you like - but first of all tell us what is the nature of the decision event?
And I was wondering why it felt so weird... Kind of there are some informations, but not much information at all. Comparing it to Sabine, You can clearly know when she gives you some relevant info. You know when she is joking. You get sources. Here? Much talk about... what actually? I bet it looks just as if politician tried to talk about science 😁
This is a response to the SH video. So, yes, you do need to watch the SH video to see what it is I am replying to. I wrote the text of this video. It is new science.
@@analysiscloud But it wasn't. There is no "new science". Yes, there are new discoveries, sometimes changing our understanding of the world, but the basic principle stays the same. Science have to make predictions. Repeatable and falsifiable. People who take some scientific facts and build a story around it, write science fiction. I love science fiction, but I would never act as if it was true. A wonderful example is a book I'm reading again now. "Xenocide" by Orson Scott Card. Similar thing did Verne in his "2000 miles". He put a lot of imagination into his story and mixed it with science. Was he correct? Yes and no. But the point is, he didn't present that story as science and facts. He made it probably for fun and it probably inspired some people to push science in this direction. So if you would present your point of view as an interesting food for thought, I wouldn't mind. But presenting it as a real science is simply misleadig.
The brain and computers are similar in that they both do computations. Making a practical artificial brain is the challenge we face. Overcoming the practical problems is why this video was created. To help.
@@MikeWiest Human. Check out my new sci fi video story here. It uses AI generated graphics. ruclips.net/video/r0iibU4x4XU/видео.html Let me know what you think of it. Thanks.
Glad you like it. Given that much of this area of research is still subject to metaphysical thought experiments there is much to leave to the imagination. I urge you to open your mind to the possibilities that await the human race. A closed mind removes you from the human connected network that already exists.
As long as science has not yet provided a clear explanation as to what a Measurement is, then we could assume that consciousness does indeed emerge from measurements uccurring at a subatomic precision in the brain
5:03 (building upto anti gravity)
5:24 "gravity is a product of thinking"
Yes, and the expansion of the Universe is caused by living things thinking.
"I've read SOME of Penrose's book and many others..." and "quantum effects don't need to survive any longer that (sic) they need to..." was enough to make me realize this person or AI is not qualified to have anything worth listening to on this topic. Next. I don't need to listen any more than I need to -- see how dumb that sounds?
Cant tell if this is ChatGPT or Grok
All original, new, science never before revealed.
@@analysiscloud your mom has never before revealed.
What is a decision? What is the neurophysiological basis of a conscious decision ? How can a brain make a decision about the brain.? How do involuntary , non-conscious decisions (i.e. automatic responses to the sensorium? Did you know that a neurone will only fire when its membrane electrical potential depolarises past a threshold level due to an external physical or chemical event?
What sort of physical or chemical event is a decision? or an idea? Platy with quantum collapsing or whayever as long as you like - but first of all tell us what is the nature of the decision event?
I have made a video replying to your questions here: ruclips.net/video/I9CJfiH55pQ/видео.html
Thank you for posing those questions.
This is an AI video. Another meaningless production. Watch the SH video instead.
And I was wondering why it felt so weird... Kind of there are some informations, but not much information at all. Comparing it to Sabine, You can clearly know when she gives you some relevant info. You know when she is joking. You get sources. Here? Much talk about... what actually? I bet it looks just as if politician tried to talk about science 😁
This is a response to the SH video. So, yes, you do need to watch the SH video to see what it is I am replying to. I wrote the text of this video. It is new science.
@@ogi22 Lols. That, sounds like a compliment.
@@analysiscloud But it wasn't. There is no "new science". Yes, there are new discoveries, sometimes changing our understanding of the world, but the basic principle stays the same. Science have to make predictions. Repeatable and falsifiable. People who take some scientific facts and build a story around it, write science fiction. I love science fiction, but I would never act as if it was true. A wonderful example is a book I'm reading again now. "Xenocide" by Orson Scott Card. Similar thing did Verne in his "2000 miles". He put a lot of imagination into his story and mixed it with science. Was he correct? Yes and no. But the point is, he didn't present that story as science and facts. He made it probably for fun and it probably inspired some people to push science in this direction. So if you would present your point of view as an interesting food for thought, I wouldn't mind. But presenting it as a real science is simply misleadig.
UFOs now. 🛸
The longer I listen, the worse it gets!
what no microtubule molecular lattices? that's where the shared electrons provide indeterminancy.
Of course there are microtubule molecular lattices. That is where (quantumly) shared electrons provide determinacy.
Great for a sci-fi book..
Thanks.
You don't seem to understand what you're talking about 🤣
It's all over the place.
Millions or billions?
😆 trillions!
This is like to explain how a computer works using the Wave Funtion on any transistor of a Cpu😅Not practical at all😅
The brain and computers are similar in that they both do computations. Making a practical artificial brain is the challenge we face. Overcoming the practical problems is why this video was created. To help.
When is your birthday?
You mean , was I born yesterday?
@@analysiscloud No, I mean, are you a human with a birthday, or are you an ai?
@@MikeWiest Human. Check out my new sci fi video story here. It uses AI generated graphics.
ruclips.net/video/r0iibU4x4XU/видео.html
Let me know what you think of it. Thanks.
The concept is ridiculous. Every minute you spend pursuing this will be a waste of time
чё за фигня? Взрослейте ребята))
So irritating to have fake narrators. Computers are stupid
Computers are stupid. An artificial quantum computer would think about how to turn you into trillions of atoms spread across the universe and do it.
Nonsense
But were you entertained nevertheless? 🤫
Nice BS
Glad you like it. Given that much of this area of research is still subject to metaphysical thought experiments there is much to leave to the imagination. I urge you to open your mind to the possibilities that await the human race. A closed mind removes you from the human connected network that already exists.