China's Trade with Russia, Iran, & North Korea is TINY

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 19 дек 2024

Комментарии • 255

  • @parkman29
    @parkman29 Месяц назад +568

    4 percent of worldwide trade is only relatively tiny, that is still a LOT of stuff

    • @guadalupe8589
      @guadalupe8589 Месяц назад +26

      That's what I was thinking. 4% isn't tiny. It's big enough to cause issues if it were to suddenly vanish

    • @RkRk-xu1ww
      @RkRk-xu1ww Месяц назад +9

      100% true . I mean population of Russia+Iran + north korea Less than of USA. So they need less money to sustain. Also , labour cost is also low in these countries.

    • @aleksandrnestrato
      @aleksandrnestrato Месяц назад +1

      @@RkRk-xu1ww
      Just one minor thing… Since you inserted those “+” signs in-between the names of those countries, it seems you count them combined, right?
      In millions of people:
      146 + 90 + 26 = 262
      I mean, 262 is significantly less than 335, but is it really less than half of 335? I.e. is 262 less than 167.5?
      Sorry, couldn’t walk by… 😅

    • @aleksandrnestrato
      @aleksandrnestrato Месяц назад

      @@RkRk-xu1ww
      Just one minor thing… Since you inserted those “+” signs in-between the names of those countries, it seems you count them combined, right?
      In millions of people:
      146 + 90 + 26 = 262
      I mean, 262 is significantly less than 335, but is it really less than half of 335? I.e. is 262 less than 167.5?
      Sorry, couldn’t walk by… 😅

    • @RkRk-xu1ww
      @RkRk-xu1ww Месяц назад

      @@aleksandrnestrato thanks 👍 for correcting me

  • @jgr7487
    @jgr7487 Месяц назад +47

    Germany & Britain trade was thriving up to the start of WW1.

    • @tanaka5395
      @tanaka5395 Месяц назад

      Facts so much so Britain had a gun powder issue at the start of the war, as they used to buy it from Germany

  • @GregorClegane402
    @GregorClegane402 Месяц назад +347

    This triangular dependence is what has prevented WW3 from breaking out yet. On the other hand diminishing Western world dominance will fuel regional conflicts all over the world.

    • @NewOrleanslocal-i5v
      @NewOrleanslocal-i5v Месяц назад

      Western powers aren’t really diminishing, the economy is just bust rn. But if anyone else was to become a superpower it would be china not
      Russia

    • @liminalcriminal_
      @liminalcriminal_ Месяц назад +9

      No it hasn’t. Ww3 wouldn’t have happened anyway. People just don’t want ww3. Huge surprise.

    • @dijon0810
      @dijon0810 Месяц назад +63

      @@liminalcriminal_ no one wanted WW2 either

    • @omega6311
      @omega6311 Месяц назад +31

      ​@@dijon0810But the German man with funny moustache had other plans

    • @liminalcriminal_
      @liminalcriminal_ Месяц назад +30

      @@dijon0810 Uhh yeah they did. Read a book. Not everyone obviously but some certainly did

  • @bo1bo1bo1unlosode
    @bo1bo1bo1unlosode Месяц назад +75

    It’s easily exaplinable.
    One trade raw materials, the other finished products, both are equally important and needed evn tho the value differs a lot

  • @MemeChuen
    @MemeChuen Месяц назад +138

    China and USA is like siblings. The enemy you always hate but still can't live without each other

    • @korrzia
      @korrzia Месяц назад +7

      Because USA Has the largest GDP

    • @hamzamahmood9565
      @hamzamahmood9565 Месяц назад +31

      Nah not siblings, never siblings. USA and Canada are like siblings. Relationship with China is purely transactional.

    • @sunsinger970
      @sunsinger970 Месяц назад

      Mexico is my brother, China on the other hand is just another slave driver we're not as confident in going to war with. That lack of confidence is only due to nuclear war and environmental destruction as well, we know we'd win in a conventional conflict.

    • @alitheonekhatarnak5163
      @alitheonekhatarnak5163 Месяц назад

      Friendship between 🇨🇳 and 🇺🇸 is higher than mountains deeper than sea

    • @Cantripping
      @Cantripping Месяц назад

      ​@@hamzamahmood9565You'd be surprised. 900000 years ago, the human population was only 10000-20000 strong, largely because the ice age almost wiped us out.
      Evolutionarily speaking, we are quite literally very closely related. If any human were to trace their ancestry back 50 generations, we would find a common ancestor.
      Really puts these sqabbles between countries into perspective.

  • @ryantron9
    @ryantron9 Месяц назад +1

    Just remember, if you think this system so secure as to stop war - to the day before WW1 started, people all over the world were saying “we’re so inextricably connected with each other through trade that war is virtually impossible to happen”.
    All it takes is one singular event to topple all of this global trade empire

  • @AlanBolshevik
    @AlanBolshevik Месяц назад +14

    Direction of change rather than snapshots...

  • @SeanOfEarth
    @SeanOfEarth Месяц назад +200

    China can afford to stop trading with Russia then

    • @mysticnovelbro
      @mysticnovelbro Месяц назад +48

      yeah, but both are turning BRICS-mode, no point going back on multipolarity now, is there?

    • @SuperCrazyEstonian
      @SuperCrazyEstonian Месяц назад +85

      Yes, but why should they? That´s the question they will have.

    • @SeanOfEarth
      @SeanOfEarth Месяц назад +7

      @@SuperCrazyEstonian to retain the much larger amount of trade with EU and US

    • @tamdang8346
      @tamdang8346 Месяц назад +4

      Well the problen is the remaining 96% mostly from the West so they can't do anything but make utube vid 😂😂

    • @tamdang8346
      @tamdang8346 Месяц назад +37

      ​@@SeanOfEarthit is both way....... and apparently it is the US and EU cant stop trading not China hahaha 😂😂 their production capacity is too low stop trade = inflation bomb 😂😂

  • @danij5055
    @danij5055 Месяц назад +2

    It's less about the amount of money and moreso about the types of goods being traded in all these transactions.

  • @ytha8424
    @ytha8424 Месяц назад +2

    This is the true reason why we’re not in ww3

  • @Reza-fn6il
    @Reza-fn6il Месяц назад +2

    And a random guy comes and say china would take the Russian side in ww3

  • @h2otote
    @h2otote Месяц назад +3

    i mean i feel like the us and china being eachothers biggest trading partner was kind of a “no shit, sherlock” sorta deal

  • @obiwankenobi6960
    @obiwankenobi6960 Месяц назад

    I think everyone just wants to be friends but there to much awkward tension between the countries and the United States are very stubborn and won't stop being suspicious of Russia like we've always been suspicious of them for no reason

  • @kom4096
    @kom4096 Месяц назад +8

    U WILL love this game, AND NO SPOILERS

  • @markmuller7962
    @markmuller7962 Месяц назад

    6 times larger? I was expecting more tbh

  • @workhardfortomorrow
    @workhardfortomorrow Месяц назад +12

    now shorts huh good

  • @doyouguysnothavephones8967
    @doyouguysnothavephones8967 Месяц назад +3

    Ok so what should we do with this information?

    • @mickoabhinayafahrel2275
      @mickoabhinayafahrel2275 Месяц назад

      You can now relax and forget all the
      fear mongering mainstream media
      said, WW3 ain't happening sooner.

  • @KingsMindsetDaily
    @KingsMindsetDaily Месяц назад +1

    Russia also had to sell oil to India for a very low price.

  • @willk49
    @willk49 Месяц назад +1

    Will trade prevent war while driving prosperity?

    • @Vizuru71
      @Vizuru71 Месяц назад +4

      It would provide more consideration into war

    • @pocketmarcy6990
      @pocketmarcy6990 Месяц назад

      If the US and China go to war both of their economies will collapse, it’s a lose-lose situation and why WW3 will likely not happen

  • @goneutt
    @goneutt Месяц назад

    Russia and China don’t have the same rail gauge, so everything still has to stop at the border and switch cars. It’s probably faster to send a ship full of containers to Kaliningrad than to move that many containers by rail

    • @savvy.1
      @savvy.1 Месяц назад +2

      Different gauge is for security reasons. If enemy capture some region, they can't use railway to transport arms leaving under armed and counter strikes more likely to succeed

  • @ernesto5712
    @ernesto5712 Месяц назад

    Oh my God, perfect statistics!

  • @осипакопьянц
    @осипакопьянц Месяц назад

    If 10percents trade with worldwide 10 percent, their trade will be 1 percent of worldwide money. Although they are close, so it will be more

  • @Giganibba511
    @Giganibba511 Месяц назад +5

    Sometimes this channel says facts woth some Biased and probaganda seasoning but still good

  • @lennhy
    @lennhy Месяц назад

    The same situation of Mexico/Canada with the US

  • @UseroneGaming
    @UseroneGaming Месяц назад

    A hate triangle.

  • @mozzarellatherat9687
    @mozzarellatherat9687 Месяц назад

    What is EU?

  • @jasonariola6363
    @jasonariola6363 Месяц назад

    Maybe the USA and the EU should stop trading with the enabler of the enemy of Ukraine 🇺🇦, things would improve quickly

    • @NAchternaam-dc3dz
      @NAchternaam-dc3dz Месяц назад

      They cant coz they dont manufacture anything. Their bubble economies would implode.

    • @sep5560
      @sep5560 Месяц назад +4

      maybe no one gives a 💩 about Ukraine, have you ever thought about that?

    • @jasonariola6363
      @jasonariola6363 Месяц назад

      @@sep5560 maybe you are a Russian supporter

    • @Sonia-u9n4t
      @Sonia-u9n4t Месяц назад +1

      sometimes I feel like Russian people care about Ukraine more than the western world

    • @Sonia-u9n4t
      @Sonia-u9n4t Месяц назад

      things would get worse for American economy very quickly

  • @YourSweatyUncle
    @YourSweatyUncle Месяц назад

    And how much of Russia trade is with EU and USA?

    • @leonx9726
      @leonx9726 Месяц назад

      Bruh, I can't tell if you're serious or not. US and EU have put 17000+ sanctions on Russia. Their trade is at an all-time low.

    • @kieranklein2527
      @kieranklein2527 Месяц назад

      EU and Russia 89 billion. Russia and USA 5 billion. According to Google anyway

  • @jasonsmith8167
    @jasonsmith8167 Месяц назад

    This means China is the number one country in the world and makes all the money

    • @CTHN7
      @CTHN7 Месяц назад +1

      No, it does not mean that. Trade is two-way street. Countries exchange products and services with each other based on their needs thus all make money. Every countries run trade surplus with some and trade deficit with others because few countries, if any, are completely self reliance on everything. China may have trade surplus with U.S. but it has trade deficit with Saudi Arabia. US may have trade deficit with Japan but it has trade surplus with Netherlands and Australia.

    • @Ric9hardify
      @Ric9hardify Месяц назад

      Don’t forget much of that made in China stuff is American and European brands benefiting from cheap labor, and selling to their home markets and making a huge profit! Also, China is well known for falsifying its economic numbers. And yes, the US is still the largest economy. And the US is the reason China is #2 anyway. Facts! Let’s not forget who is buying all there stuff. And I always tell people, the US is the only first world country that has a lot of room to grow still. Literally. Brazil could do it too, but they are so busy exterminating all the black people they have left. While blacks in America have a greater GDP than many countries. This also shows China’s mistake. The US is rich because each ethnic group is allowed to prosper. In China? Nope.

  • @AZ-bl5qs
    @AZ-bl5qs Месяц назад

    You don't say Sherlock. America and EU have much larger economies than Iran, Korea and Eussia.

  • @TheArklyte
    @TheArklyte Месяц назад +32

    Tbh it's surprising that EU trade is higher then with US. I thought that US and PRC were the best "under the table" buddies for at least several decades now.
    P.S.: I feel like the most important graphic should be China-India trade. If WW3 would be anywhere, it would be between those two and it can be predicted by drop in trade.

    • @sanjak689
      @sanjak689 Месяц назад +5

      Usa put sanctions and they found alternatives in South America. Eu was always a big client for China and swiss canal is literally just Chinese ships passing to Europe

    • @Bob_Smith19
      @Bob_Smith19 Месяц назад

      You paying attention the Middle East? Israel and Iran are hell bent on starting WW3.

    • @travisjohnson6703
      @travisjohnson6703 Месяц назад +13

      Germany and Britain's largest trading partners in 1914 were each other. We all know how that went

    • @cafe1925
      @cafe1925 Месяц назад

      Yeah no. India and China causing the ww3 is far less than Iran-US or Russia-US.

    • @Sinaeb
      @Sinaeb Месяц назад +2

      the EU has more people

  • @TheBigExclusive
    @TheBigExclusive Месяц назад +3

    Those trade numbers were only a temporary high.

  • @onemoreweek-lol
    @onemoreweek-lol Месяц назад +17

    From admirable ytber to US propaganda😢

    • @garp9269
      @garp9269 Месяц назад

      its quite literally just real trade statistics, if the real world is US propaganda then it might be over for you tbh

    • @lupsastta90
      @lupsastta90 Месяц назад +1

      It’s wishful thinking that US has any sort of propaganda, or anti-propaganda capability.

    • @doridore1234
      @doridore1234 Месяц назад

      he's been that way for a while

  • @EternalKhann
    @EternalKhann Месяц назад +8

    Wow. This channel turned into a kindergartener's idea of geopolitics.

    • @doridore1234
      @doridore1234 Месяц назад

      Been that way for a hot minute lmao. I used to think his videos were good, then I finished high school.

  • @theglavenglossproject2693
    @theglavenglossproject2693 Месяц назад

    i guess disney isnt the only one making pathetic villains

  • @gregjohnson2073
    @gregjohnson2073 Месяц назад

    So where does russiua other 66% trade go to?

    • @Sonia-u9n4t
      @Sonia-u9n4t Месяц назад

      I guess it's other countries of brics

  • @martinomasolo8833
    @martinomasolo8833 Месяц назад

    Choose wisely china

    • @douchebagg7
      @douchebagg7 Месяц назад

      Honestly y'all can't catch a break from crying over how expensive things are as it is, imagine if suddenly all trades stopped with china, no way in hell you're gonna get products costing a few bucks without their cheap labour

    • @aporifera
      @aporifera Месяц назад

      Wisely? I mean the U.S. had been hostile towards the current Chinese government since its inception, fueled by the paranoia that communism could take over the United States. The U.S. meddled with the Korean War which had nothing to do with it. It also attempts to lock China's access to the Pacific Ocean and is quite successful at it. Taiwan is also none of the U.S.'s business outside of said strategy. The U.S. is on the offensive, not China. And in terms of human rights, China ain't great, but is surely a great deal better than many other countries the U.S. choose to "befriend." I'd be surprised if China could actually view the U.S. an ally given its history.

  • @brandonlesco4821
    @brandonlesco4821 Месяц назад

    That's not exactly low

  • @vietdungnguyen7972
    @vietdungnguyen7972 Месяц назад +2

    The western invent this new axis and now they say it dumb🤣🤣🤣

  • @benh.92
    @benh.92 Месяц назад

    Congratulations, you warred yourself into vassalship.

  • @samil4845
    @samil4845 Месяц назад

    This dude has an issue with numbers 😅😅😅😅😅, 240B is only tiny 4 percent, while the trade is 660B with the US is everything abd it's unlosable!

  • @sharphamer
    @sharphamer Месяц назад +1

    I used to really enjoy all of these videos here, but now it's a bunch if repeats in the form of shorts. I'll be unsubscribing soon if this continues. (Post a short at the same time as a full length video if you want to do ad-shorts)

  • @aleksandrnestrato
    @aleksandrnestrato Месяц назад +4

    Ssooo…
    $240,000,000,000 is China’s 4%
    Hence: 240,000,000,000 ÷ 4 =…
    1% = $60,000,000,000
    60,000,000,000 × 100 =…
    China’s total trade is $6,000,000,000,000 - six thousand billion dollars. It is six trillion dollars!
    Wow, China is a big economy!

  • @MassachusettsEdits
    @MassachusettsEdits Месяц назад +2

    WW2 Axis: 💀💀💀
    Russian axis team: 💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀

  • @ronaldrebulanan7327
    @ronaldrebulanan7327 Месяц назад

    2024 Paris Olympics were dominated by u.s it's allies Europe & Asia. It's only china got into 2nd so in world of trades & economy it's similar also

  • @learningisfun5163
    @learningisfun5163 Месяц назад

    Problem with Europeans and Americans look at spreadsheet too much and nothing else. To China the trade with Russia is worth more it's about ideology

    • @korrzia
      @korrzia Месяц назад +1

      China is friends with Russia on paper but in reality, China is Russia's enemy because China remembers that Russia forced China to give Russia Manchuria which is why Russia is China's enemy. Which is why they are "friends" on paper.

  • @nightmagister
    @nightmagister Месяц назад +7

    It is almost like the GDP of US and EU combined is equal 40x the GDP of Russia.

    • @CTHN7
      @CTHN7 Месяц назад +5

      Flaw argument and comparison in context of video topic. GDP size is not equal to or proportionate with trade size. Canada GDP is relatively small but its trade volume with US is huge. France GDP is large but its trade volume with China is relatively small.

  • @oleggerts
    @oleggerts Месяц назад +2

    And it doesn’t bother you that EU is not a country but a union of 27 nations? Can’t compare like that

    • @ildna
      @ildna Месяц назад +3

      The point is just to compare China's trade with the Western world, no?

    • @pocketmarcy6990
      @pocketmarcy6990 Месяц назад +3

      The EU is still one large economic bloc

    • @betaorionis2164
      @betaorionis2164 27 дней назад

      For what is trade, they act a single entity.

  • @CTHN7
    @CTHN7 Месяц назад +5

    This is a dumb analytical video. Numerically speaking Russia-China trade volume is now on par with Germany-China trade volume and still growing while Germany (European largest trade partner with China) trade volume is decreasing. Soon Russia will exceed Germany as the largest China trade partner in Europe. If you want to compare then compare country to country and not country to a block of nations.

    • @yerik6034
      @yerik6034 Месяц назад +2

      Did u forget when he mentioned the USA?

    • @CTHN7
      @CTHN7 Месяц назад +2

      @@yerik6034 US-China trade volume is very high but it’s a misleading number. Majority of China imports are U.S. companies importing their own products made in China and not Chinese companies’ products. So when Trump and Biden impose tariffs on China imports, they are imposing tax on mainly US products and paid by American consumers. The tariffs in turn raise product costs which Americans buy and consume while feeling good about stick it to the Chinese. The irony is Americans also complain about how expensive has become or high inflation. US companies are not going to give up their profits so they just pass the import tariffs to American consumers. And you think China would just bow and obey like US vassal Japan? China would impose tit-for-tat tariffs then find alternative sources to US products. Tit for tat tariffs was the reason for late 1920s worldwide depression. These already rich US Presidents (Trump and Biden) and rich lawmakers (who are mostly lawyers) will not be hurt by the tariffs but ordinary or low-income Americans will or already experiencing.

    • @CTHN7
      @CTHN7 Месяц назад

      @@yerik6034 China wants to trade with US. It is US that wants to decouple trade with China. US doesn’t want free and fair trade despite what it propagandizes in the media. US wants to maintain status quo which is zero-sum trade arrangement which US always on top. When China finally has competitive products, US uses national security reason to block those products from U.S. market while US enjoyed decades of access to China market. Bottom line is China forming these trade alliances out of necessity because US is incrementally putting up trade barriers to Chinese companies products, and U.S. is pressuring its allies (EU, Five-Eyes, Japan, S Korea, Taiwan) to follow US actions despite doing so would hurt their own companies. So the video presentation is both bad analytically and misinformed.

  • @stephendoherty8291
    @stephendoherty8291 Месяц назад +1

    China just imports fossil fuels and some minerals. Russia has to accept the price deal. So in fact Europe may have as much leverage over china than the US and the war impacts the the EU more. China knows the US is more immune from Russia as its trade is even less than china. The Russian citizen is but a shadow in value and insignificant in talent or military strength compared to keeping an uneasy trade with the US and not making the EU go the same way. Yet Russia is not losing and it can take adversity as well as any chinese party edict. A hotter war in Europe now, does not benefit china knowing trade issues with the US if Trump wins

  • @voyager8187
    @voyager8187 Месяц назад

    Niceeeer

  • @EvilKamaji
    @EvilKamaji Месяц назад

    BRICS besties

  • @dilbertosantiago2959
    @dilbertosantiago2959 Месяц назад +3

    That doesn't mean anything...

  • @Tsuruchi_420
    @Tsuruchi_420 Месяц назад

    Why is this guy posting nato cope on main? Like, are you that desperate for nothing pm the world to ever change that you have to manifest it?

  • @SaUl95954
    @SaUl95954 Месяц назад +1

    Imagine if all this trade wasn't done in USD, or away the SWIFT system. Curious.

  • @Duke6598
    @Duke6598 Месяц назад +1

    I dont think those stats are fully accurate when it comes to North Korea and Iran specifically. A lot of trade happens undercover.

  • @jamesblackshaw132
    @jamesblackshaw132 Месяц назад +2

    Don't they also trade with Belarus, Brazil and South Africa 🤔

  • @hailmammonmoments7568
    @hailmammonmoments7568 Месяц назад

    It’s hard not to ask this like a troll, but it would be pointless not to ask: How many Russian women are learning Mandarin? Cantonese?

    • @learningisfun5163
      @learningisfun5163 Месяц назад

      People learn the langauge of countries they want to migrate to not about trade and yes most Russians who speak mandarin or Cantonese are still woman as hhey are the ones who do the office paperwork of import and export the man signs the check

    • @CTHN7
      @CTHN7 Месяц назад +3

      Are you equating trading in products and services with trading in women? Otherwise it would be pointless to ask.

    • @douchebagg7
      @douchebagg7 Месяц назад

      Very few if not none, though I've seen Russian women being into Korean men(as if that doesn't goes for the entire world..) but not for chings

  • @Kaldoon73
    @Kaldoon73 Месяц назад

    I think that the videos will be better without music

  • @jasonariola6363
    @jasonariola6363 Месяц назад

    Wtf

  • @Matrix32728
    @Matrix32728 Месяц назад +1

    Is your pfp a windmill or an oversimplified pig?

  • @genbeta-words
    @genbeta-words Месяц назад

    Yoo I m early 6 out here

  • @MichaelXiong-jx7ke
    @MichaelXiong-jx7ke Месяц назад +4

    原来你是我最想留住的幸运,原来我们和爱情曾经靠得那么静🎵

  • @OfficialSaul
    @OfficialSaul Месяц назад

    Fr?

  • @richardjamesgallardojr.7584
    @richardjamesgallardojr.7584 Месяц назад +1

    I live in Kansas City Missouri😂 I'm not worried about what's going on in the Gaza strip😂 I am more worried about where my next Casey strip is coming from😂😂😂

  • @santiagodm3483
    @santiagodm3483 Месяц назад

    Fragilist idiot, they provide raw materials that are fundamental to keep the chinese industries competitive, that small number hides a huge amount of information, because actually Russia has quite the leverage over chinese energy grid and provides raw materials for the industry that will export their finished products to the EU

    • @marcoaorelio6409
      @marcoaorelio6409 Месяц назад

      Bro, China's energy is made of coal (85% from domestic production), oil (30% from domestic production), gas (60% from domestic production) and renewable sources (100% from domestic production).
      But oil is only 18% of the country energy consumption, gas is only 8% and coal is 60%. So if China imported 100% of their fossil fuel from Russia it would be equal to 12.5% of China energy consumption

  • @genbeta-words
    @genbeta-words Месяц назад +3

    Hey u dropped a pin 📌
    Can I have it?

  • @JesusOrDestruction
    @JesusOrDestruction Месяц назад

    jew