They are really quite slow stock, once I did just an exhaust, intake, upped the boost a hair and a tune it really woke up. Sounds way better with an exhaust.
With a good launch, an EU spec 2g VR-4 is good for 0 to 60 in 4.6s/4.7s and 0 to 100mph in 12.5s, 1/4m in 12.9s to 13.3s @ 103 to 105mph, bone stock. My stock USDM 1995 3000GT VR-4 does 0 to 60 in 4.7s on average (using an electronic device) and 0 to 100mph in 12.8s, and pulls consistent 13.1s / 13.2s @ 103 to 104mph, bone stock. Don't roll out and punch it like this, though it IS impressive to know that with a terrible launch it will still hit 60 in 5.7s and 100 in 13.8s...you'd shave over a second off with a good launch!
He went from 0mph launch costed nothing. A high rpm launch would do 100kph in 4.7s and the quarter mile in 12.9-13.2@103-105mph. This is the EU model, so it has 13G turbos. He short shifted AND didn't launch it...so correcting for that, this is a 12s car.
Not so much, as torque falls off as overall speed increases. Above 120 km's, the needle woulda returned about where it started. That wasn't the case. Worst has guzzler I'd ever seen LoL!
Axilrod yeah, with no launch! With a good high rpm launch, 0-60mph is done in 4.7s and the quarter mile in 12.9-13.1s@104-105mph in the EU spec GTO TT, it had 13G turbos stock. Our stock USDM spec 1996 3000GT VR4 ran a best of 13.15@103.8mph and averages 13.1-13.2@13.1s@103-104mph. These cars are faster than the new FK8 Type R, Golf R manual and runs the same times as the Focus RS.
Then Post a Vid :) I'd love to see the acceleration on an MR. I've heard that they would go under 5 seconds easy! Best car for it's money in NZ at the moment!
N naw, they all had 320. The 1st gen cars got the 'free boost mod' once the 2g cars came out. It was simply removing a tiny rubber restrictor in about 2 minutes. The mod raised the boost slightly to match the 2nd gens.
@@Brandon__M 91-93 was 300hp. Easily fixable by removing a small plastic pill that blocked the boost control solenoid resulting in 2 more PSI. 94+ where all 320hp.
ztwntyn8 the US model runs 13.1-13.2@103-104mph, our stock 1996 3000GT VR4 ran a best of 13.15@103.8mph. This is the EU model which had 13G turbos stock, so this is a high 12s car stock. He didn't launch it at all.
Justin Shaheri it does 0 to 60 in under 5 seconds stock! Doesn't need anything but a better launch. This was an AWFUL launch, he just floored it from 0mph. A stock EU spec 6 speed will do 0 to 60mph in 4.7s and the quarter mile in 12.9-13.1s@104-105mph, no modifications. Our stock USDM 1996 3000GT VR4 ran a best of 13.15@103.8mph and averages 13.1-13.2@103-104mph, again, zero mods. Electronically measured 0-60mph in 4.7s-4.8s. Its all in the launch.
@@FID3R as I said I gave the explanation as to why in stock form the MR is faster. I have one that is over 1000hp but doesn't have the crappy 6g72 in it anymore.
@@RichRusso4218 MR is lighter with different gearing and depending how they spec it new even different difs as well . power is not everything 600 hp are perfect for a car that weights 1400 kg . if you like drag races its something i find extremely boring so sure more hp helps. ps if you think 6g72 is crappy 2 things are happening 1 ) you dont have a gto 2) you dont know how to build that engine :)
@@FID3R Lmfao, I own my own well known performance shop in the states. The 6g72 is notoriously known for their oiling issues and spinning bearings. Ever heard of my good friend Ray Pampena? He will even agree how shitty these engines are. 1. IDK why you're arguing about facts that I already pointed out to you 2. I don't own a GTO, I own a VR4 (can't wait to hear you cry about that one) which I daily drive at that power level. 3. I have already said what I needed to say and you keep repeating what I said.
god, even for a stock car that sounds good
Stock cars are best. Sounds great, is very quick, looks great. No need to modify it, so I'm glad this one was stock.
They are really quite slow stock, once I did just an exhaust, intake, upped the boost a hair and a tune it really woke up. Sounds way better with an exhaust.
@@RichRusso4218 No, no need to modify the shit out of cars.
That's dumb.
It makes them uglier.
@@fistofram5526 depends. Exhaust, new turbos, ecu, bigger radiator, blow off valve
@@fistofram5526 "Modify the shit out of a car" and "wake a car up by improving the obvious factory bottlenecks" are different things.
With a good launch, an EU spec 2g VR-4 is good for 0 to 60 in 4.6s/4.7s and 0 to 100mph in 12.5s, 1/4m in 12.9s to 13.3s @ 103 to 105mph, bone stock.
My stock USDM 1995 3000GT VR-4 does 0 to 60 in 4.7s on average (using an electronic device) and 0 to 100mph in 12.8s, and pulls consistent 13.1s / 13.2s @ 103 to 104mph, bone stock.
Don't roll out and punch it like this, though it IS impressive to know that with a terrible launch it will still hit 60 in 5.7s and 100 in 13.8s...you'd shave over a second off with a good launch!
Bone stock the USDM is just as fast as the EU Spec, although the EU spec had bigger factory turbos.
I own a '91 VR-4. I can confirm these statements are true. 🙂
It’s probably not a vr4 even tho it says that was more like the sl
The fuel gauge was moving a lot because the level is in the front of the tank and the fuel was being forced to the back.
Its in the middle on the right side of the tank, the guages are actually pretty slow to react as to not catch the slosh when sending a signal.
Lol yea that launch costed him bout 3$
He went from 0mph launch costed nothing. A high rpm launch would do 100kph in 4.7s and the quarter mile in 12.9-13.2@103-105mph. This is the EU model, so it has 13G turbos. He short shifted AND didn't launch it...so correcting for that, this is a 12s car.
Not so much, as torque falls off as overall speed increases. Above 120 km's, the needle woulda returned about where it started. That wasn't the case. Worst has guzzler I'd ever seen LoL!
The speedometer is in km/hour, the 0-60mph (100kmh) is 5.7 second.
Axilrod yeah, with no launch! With a good high rpm launch, 0-60mph is done in 4.7s and the quarter mile in 12.9-13.1s@104-105mph in the EU spec GTO TT, it had 13G turbos stock.
Our stock USDM spec 1996 3000GT VR4 ran a best of 13.15@103.8mph and averages 13.1-13.2@13.1s@103-104mph.
These cars are faster than the new FK8 Type R, Golf R manual and runs the same times as the Focus RS.
oh these fucking fuel comments. never heard of g force?
bro i got scared as fuck thinking this was in mph
launch at a higher rev, awd can do it without slipping, itll take 4k and not slip, but itll kill your clutch
He could do with more RPM and better time then
Then Post a Vid :) I'd love to see the acceleration on an MR. I've heard that they would go under 5 seconds easy! Best car for it's money in NZ at the moment!
hi mate doing now
@@leejones1116 wow. This is an old comment. No longer super cheap. Hope you dont break it
@@christopherjohnston6343 sun
It stopped the video b4 he crashed lol. But damn look at the odometer. High miles and that baby still flys!
Keene Watts 135000km is not that much if well maintained, really.
Its a brand new Mitsubishi ;)
135.000km? its nothing for this engine if u changed the oil at time.@@Twiiiix
@@r.fumador1146 Exactly
286 was about right for the first gens. the 98-99 vr4 has 320
lol they all have 320 man. the difference is the psi is turned up a little on the new ones
No, 1990-1994 VR4 was 300hp. 95-99 VR4 was 320hp.
N naw, they all had 320. The 1st gen cars got the 'free boost mod' once the 2g cars came out. It was simply removing a tiny rubber restrictor in about 2 minutes. The mod raised the boost slightly to match the 2nd gens.
@@Brandon__M 91-93 was 300hp. Easily fixable by removing a small plastic pill that blocked the boost control solenoid resulting in 2 more PSI. 94+ where all 320hp.
I guess it runs about 13.5-13.6 in the quarter. I'm sure it's going over a hundred so it has to be more than 13.4 but either way it's a fast 3000.
ztwntyn8 the US model runs 13.1-13.2@103-104mph, our stock 1996 3000GT VR4 ran a best of 13.15@103.8mph.
This is the EU model which had 13G turbos stock, so this is a high 12s car stock. He didn't launch it at all.
Non male!!
If you have the clutch you can launch these cars sub 4.0 seconds and with 14psi it will run 100mph under 10 sec
sound like a 406 Coupe 3.0 V6
Ручник: дорогой дневник...
Mitsubishi V6 and the PSA-Renault (ES9 V6) sound similar
Stock?
stock?
0:04
forgotten jdm legend. i have one but its in terrible condition
Get a boost controller and ur looking at 0 to 60 under 5 easily
Justin Shaheri it does 0 to 60 in under 5 seconds stock! Doesn't need anything but a better launch. This was an AWFUL launch, he just floored it from 0mph.
A stock EU spec 6 speed will do 0 to 60mph in 4.7s and the quarter mile in 12.9-13.1s@104-105mph, no modifications.
Our stock USDM 1996 3000GT VR4 ran a best of 13.15@103.8mph and averages 13.1-13.2@103-104mph, again, zero mods. Electronically measured 0-60mph in 4.7s-4.8s.
Its all in the launch.
What is wrong with the fuel display? Oh wait it is normal...
Звук как в самалете
He probably won't come home :D
Damn this was 1/8 tank of gas lmao. Nice though. What was the light that came up?
Brake Sensor Warning Light, I think
It's the acceleration pushing the has past the sensor
Not even close. Stock a vr4 has 320 hp tt. this has alot more
286 hp?
EU spec should be close to 320hp. about 240-250 whp
look at the fuel gauge ;)
Tomek Ligudziński g force.. do you even know what it is?
yes,this stock.......mine 4.7 sec 400hp
i have a gto mr and its much faster than this.....
GTO MR has shorter gearing. This car has slightly bigger turbos but the gearing really slows it down. It is a GT car afterall.
@@RichRusso4218 as i said i do have a gto mr 600 hp which i have rebuild and tuned by myself. They are much faster than this.
@@FID3R as I said I gave the explanation as to why in stock form the MR is faster. I have one that is over 1000hp but doesn't have the crappy 6g72 in it anymore.
@@RichRusso4218 MR is lighter with different gearing and depending how they spec it new even different difs as well .
power is not everything 600 hp are perfect for a car that weights 1400 kg . if you like drag races its something i find extremely boring so sure more hp helps.
ps if you think 6g72 is crappy 2 things are happening 1 ) you dont have a gto
2) you dont know how to build that engine :)
@@FID3R Lmfao, I own my own well known performance shop in the states. The 6g72 is notoriously known for their oiling issues and spinning bearings. Ever heard of my good friend Ray Pampena? He will even agree how shitty these engines are.
1. IDK why you're arguing about facts that I already pointed out to you
2. I don't own a GTO, I own a VR4 (can't wait to hear you cry about that one) which I daily drive at that power level.
3. I have already said what I needed to say and you keep repeating what I said.