Uniform Circular Motion and Centripetal Force

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 14 окт 2024
  • Enough of this moving in straight lines business, let's go in circles! Circular motion may not be productive but it's super fun. Ferris wheels are fun. Yes they are, don't be a spoilsport. Roller coasters are fun too. And merry-go-rounds. And learning about centripetal force. Look, I don't understand why you're resisting so much, we are talking about a freaking amusement park. Fine, be that way, I'll go by myself. You stay here and learn this math!
    Watch the whole Classical Physics playlist: bit.ly/ProfDave...
    Modern Physics Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDave...
    Mathematics Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDave...
    General Chemistry Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDave...
    Organic Chemistry Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDave...
    Biochemistry Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDave...
    Biology Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveBio
    EMAIL► ProfessorDaveExplains@gmail.com
    PATREON► / professordaveexplains
    Check out "Is This Wi-Fi Organic?", my book on disarming pseudoscience!
    Amazon: amzn.to/2HtNpVH
    Bookshop: bit.ly/39cKADM
    Barnes and Noble: bit.ly/3pUjmrn
    Book Depository: bit.ly/3aOVDlT

Комментарии • 226

  • @syedakamal7584
    @syedakamal7584 5 лет назад +165

    Your 6 minute video summarized what my teacher was trying to explain for two hours!
    Extremely helpful thanks!

    • @bunbun103
      @bunbun103 3 года назад +2

      lucky, im in 6th grade and my dad could have explained it fastly but hes making me watch videos that i cannot unerstand (at all)

    • @oofy1362
      @oofy1362 2 года назад +1

      lol thats like every single comment here

    • @harrisbala.b9608
      @harrisbala.b9608 2 года назад

      same fact for to bro

  • @enamicaaktersriti3922
    @enamicaaktersriti3922 5 лет назад +99

    i love the way he teaches..way better than the professor i have in uni

    • @jordanli5434
      @jordanli5434 3 года назад +3

      Should be, the profs are not professional at teaching

  • @sarahholland5980
    @sarahholland5980 5 лет назад +35

    this video is so simple but well-made... i'm studying for finals and when i started struggling with centripetal acceleration i had to come back to this specific video to remember it again. thank you professor dave!!

  • @obvea
    @obvea 2 года назад +12

    I appreciate the fact that all your videos are not long and they are easy to understand. Thank you Dave

  • @bclaytz
    @bclaytz 4 года назад +30

    Dave, I love you dude. I am reviewing A Level physics after graduating with a physics degree 11 years ago and I've forgotten everything. You explain everything so well, it's amazing. Thanks a bunch!

  • @mahbubrashid2935
    @mahbubrashid2935 7 лет назад +27

    Right now, your videos are the favorite shows for me(RUclips/TV)....every now and then I check whether you have uploaded a video or not.....Thank you so much for making science so easy to comprehend!

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  7 лет назад +24

      if you subscribe to the channel youtube will notify you every time i post! that way you won't miss any of the sweetness!

  • @edwardwoods2991
    @edwardwoods2991 5 лет назад +92

    I have fallen in 😍 with your channel Dave. It's a perfect balance of thoroughness and brevity.

  • @j6rdant
    @j6rdant 7 месяцев назад +4

    00:01 Uniform circular motion requires different equations
    00:47 Uniform circular motion involves constant tangential speed and a constant radius.
    01:30 Shorter distance in same time means slower speed
    02:07 Centripetal force causes constant change in direction.
    02:47 Centripetal force is generated by centripetal acceleration.
    03:31 Centripetal force keeps objects in circular motion
    04:11 Centrifugal force is not a real force, it's due to inertia.
    04:49 Uniform Circular Motion and Centripetal Force explained

  • @christianangelo4976
    @christianangelo4976 3 года назад +8

    No cap, this dude keeps me sane. THANK YOU!

  • @jerryleivon7852
    @jerryleivon7852 6 лет назад +21

    Awesome teaching... Made the whole chapter easy! Thank you so much

  • @sophie7553
    @sophie7553 3 года назад +9

    I am on a conquest of watching the whole playlist.

  • @AstroArtAmaan
    @AstroArtAmaan Месяц назад

    I have not seen anyone else explain some so clearly and Professor Dave. He really knows how to make science understandable!

  • @ajinkyadeshpande6271
    @ajinkyadeshpande6271 7 лет назад +49

    professor Dave has helped me a lot

  • @Insigniume
    @Insigniume 2 года назад +1

    Thank you so much. I missed a week of school and wanted to catch up on physics, and you explained in 6 minutes what my teacher explains in 3 classes! And you explained it way more clearly and simply than him.

  • @ΣοφίαΣτουπά-ρ2τ
    @ΣοφίαΣτουπά-ρ2τ 2 года назад +1

    I have an exam tomorrow, you literally explained everything I need to know in 6 minutes. Amazing!

  • @angeliemaebonaobra4448
    @angeliemaebonaobra4448 7 лет назад +11

    Professor Dave, thank you very much.

  • @toad9964
    @toad9964 2 года назад +2

    You always save the day, you're getting me through a college physics class. Thanks so much!

  • @lbrandon1227
    @lbrandon1227 5 месяцев назад +1

    Thank you very much you are very appreciative Professor Dave Hats off

  • @TheCheese9
    @TheCheese9 7 лет назад +13

    Thank you proff Dave !!!
    Have you considered doing a short Electricity series ?

  • @boofang10
    @boofang10 Год назад +1

    Comprehensive, yet easy to understand !! TQ Professor Dave !! 😁👍🏻👍🏻

  • @sheetalmadi336
    @sheetalmadi336 4 года назад +3

    You have answered many of my questions in this little video..What is more beautiful than this😁..

  • @delederrick6319
    @delederrick6319 2 года назад +1

    i love his lessons now everything is so simple

  • @overlordprincekhan
    @overlordprincekhan 5 лет назад +21

    3:54
    Owh, no.... that would hurt.... XD

    • @ceeces
      @ceeces 3 года назад

      I almost commented that 😳

  • @megu-shii207
    @megu-shii207 4 года назад +1

    I always watching your videos whenever I am troubled with physics and chemistry, it helps me a lotttt❤

  • @Do-Some-Change
    @Do-Some-Change Год назад

    You always explain so well

  • @oshaalashari1264
    @oshaalashari1264 4 года назад

    sir this channel is just love the way you explain is awesome and makes the whole topic simpler and easier

  • @jamesrobertson9149
    @jamesrobertson9149 7 лет назад +4

    very, very good explanation.

  • @joshspring
    @joshspring Год назад +1

    What a thrill at 5:00

  • @Sunitamarwadikitchen6921
    @Sunitamarwadikitchen6921 4 года назад +3

    wow this video has helped me so much thank you very much dave!!!

  • @ankurkaushik2074
    @ankurkaushik2074 3 года назад +1

    Good evening Sir,
    Very helpful and eassy to understand,
    Thanks and regards,
    Ankur

  • @vincentkk7701
    @vincentkk7701 7 лет назад +1

    Good graphics and Good way of explaining

  • @hathehhesseythahassayahath6395
    @hathehhesseythahassayahath6395 3 года назад +2

    Omgg I love ur hair it's so long and pretty please share ur hair care routine

  • @DustinTheHuman
    @DustinTheHuman 4 года назад +102

    it looks like jesus christ has reincarnated lmao
    Oof, i just remembered that I'm Catholic and we believe in ressurection 🤸

    • @forpurposes3168
      @forpurposes3168 4 года назад +7

      why are you here mary

    • @gamewalker909
      @gamewalker909 3 года назад +8

      with how much of my grades he's saved, he pretty much is

  • @patelshlok1343
    @patelshlok1343 4 года назад +2

    now i can understand this completly. thanks sir. it is very helpfull for me🙏

  • @aakankshasagi2476
    @aakankshasagi2476 3 года назад

    in this video the answer for your question is 6.25N professor Dave but you gave the answer as 6.3N..............but theexplanation is very good............at first i was blank on this concept but after seeing your video i became an expert in this topic and i even got full marks in my exam............thank you so much

  • @vaishnavijoshi7785
    @vaishnavijoshi7785 6 лет назад +447

    * khan academy has left the chat *

  • @son_robel9523
    @son_robel9523 3 года назад

    Professor I really respect you. By your knowledge.

  • @euanwilliams2033
    @euanwilliams2033 3 года назад

    Hi Professor Dave, thanks for all the great videos. I think that I spotted a slight mistake at 2:55, where you say that centripetal acceleration is inversely proportional to r. However, tangential velocity is v*r, therefore tangential velocity squared/radius will equal omega squared times r, so they are linearly related.

  • @Ikan0wnzu
    @Ikan0wnzu 5 лет назад +1

    dave youre a legend mate

  • @ronitmandal7301
    @ronitmandal7301 7 лет назад +4

    Thanks Mr.Dave, it helped a lot!

  • @stephaniewilliams7992
    @stephaniewilliams7992 5 лет назад +1

    Thanks dave.... wish i had a professor like you....

  • @noyalkurian7793
    @noyalkurian7793 5 лет назад +1

    Your explanation is just amazing professor 👨‍🏫👨‍🏫👨‍🏫

  • @BOBO_4869
    @BOBO_4869 Месяц назад

    Thx for this detailed video, helped a lot

  • @kujirakan9537
    @kujirakan9537 3 года назад

    your cartoon animation is the best, keep it up

  • @malaypaul6848
    @malaypaul6848 Год назад +1

    1 min of Dave's vdo is equivalent to 1 HR of my school tchr

  • @minanooralden6366
    @minanooralden6366 8 месяцев назад +1

    This is soooo helpfullll :)

  • @safasajid6942
    @safasajid6942 4 года назад

    Thank you prof.Dave!

  • @shaikhaalmeer3205
    @shaikhaalmeer3205 2 года назад

    your explanations are the best!

  • @cabbage5114
    @cabbage5114 2 года назад +1

    After hearing for years that centrifugal force isn't a real force, I finally understood why. Prof, you are our savior, science Jesus.

  • @aliimran-ly5wz
    @aliimran-ly5wz 6 лет назад +3

    Sir plzz cover and explain some topics of alternating current

  • @hydroidtech892
    @hydroidtech892 3 года назад

    Dave, you are a good man

  • @maielkady2570
    @maielkady2570 5 лет назад +1

    Thank you !

  • @cartoonic6039
    @cartoonic6039 9 месяцев назад

    I have a very simple but intuitive question.
    Why doesnt the object collapse into the point.
    Since the centripetal force is an acceleration is increasing with time it should get to a point where its high enough to pull the object towards its centre.
    For example:
    The electron in an atom if not for its stationary state it should be pulled towards the nucleus since the proton and nucleus attract but what keeps it moving in a circular path is the fact that they have fixed energy called stationary States so they can't lose energy.
    But objects in the real world dont have fixed energy level so what keeps them in circular path?
    Another example is that if we change the mechanics occurring on the body interns of force, The centripetal force will be the F=m×a but converting the objects tangential velocity into force its F=0 since it has no acceleration.Resolving the 2 forces the object is supposed to move towards the center so why does it still moves circular

    • @Attalla-t9b
      @Attalla-t9b 7 месяцев назад

      Perhaps tangential acceleration is stronger than centripetal acceleration, and the object should follow the stronger force more

    • @cartoonic6039
      @cartoonic6039 7 месяцев назад

      @@Attalla-t9b there is no tangential acceleration if there is velocity so the tangential acceleration is zero

  • @yadeelbezuayehu5901
    @yadeelbezuayehu5901 3 года назад +1

    Tenx professor u really helped me a lot

  • @kujirakan9537
    @kujirakan9537 3 года назад

    best teacher , wow i follow u first on chemistry, wow u are also excelled in teaching physics. The best video on centripetal force in the universe

  • @nothankyou9733
    @nothankyou9733 2 года назад

    Love you Dave

  • @vaishaliawhale2764
    @vaishaliawhale2764 6 лет назад +3

    Any uniform circular motion example, like earth which doesn't stop, which is constant in speed any other example

  • @a.s.7775
    @a.s.7775 7 лет назад +7

    First of all, thanks for all the help! I never thought I would be able to understand physics LOL!
    This chapter was really hard for me and I don't feel like you get so much into it in this video. Is there anyother video about this out there that you've posted? I had big problems with equations and the formula K=1/2 * Mv^2 + 1/2 * Iw^2

  • @kimmeri8467
    @kimmeri8467 4 года назад +1

    thank you very much

  • @ajaydebnath92
    @ajaydebnath92 7 лет назад +1

    Professor Dave is really great

  • @SatishNatarajan
    @SatishNatarajan 6 лет назад

    Thank you professor Dave

  • @makarandrikibe3136
    @makarandrikibe3136 6 лет назад +2

    good explanation

  • @felixgallo5132
    @felixgallo5132 4 года назад

    Awsome!
    Very useful and quickly!

  • @cameronestrada1430
    @cameronestrada1430 Год назад +1

    is anyone else getting 3.125 N in the check your understanding question? I solved it like 6 different ways and thats the only answer I get. I do, however, get 6.25 if you *dont* divide by 2. Did Dave forget to divide by 2 or am I just doing something wrong?

  • @venus_9528
    @venus_9528 4 года назад

    Thanks I've an exam tomorrow and you helped me out

  • @JulienStJames
    @JulienStJames 6 лет назад

    Thanks to him, I passed my research paper. Thanks GOAT!

  • @BiancaDianaT
    @BiancaDianaT 4 года назад +1

    STATIC friction from the road as the car navigates a road? I'm a bit confused about why it's not kinetic friction. The car is already is motion, I think? Interesting

    • @carultch
      @carultch 3 года назад +1

      Due to the fact that the wheels rotate, the point of contact between the tires and the road becomes an instantaneous center of zero velocity for each wheel. This is a point where the wheel that is in both translation and rotation, is locally at rest. The force of static friction prevents the tire from skidding, so that the car only moves according to the direction set up by the various axes of rotation of the wheels.
      Static friction enables the force of traction, that allows the drive wheels to propel the car forward, and allows the steering wheels to change the direction of the car on a flat road. It also works with the braking of the car. The kinetic friction occurs between the brake drum and shoe, so that it doesn't have to occur between the tire and road. If your brakes lock up, your car will skid, and steering won't let you control it. This is why we have ABS brakes, so that the wheel-road remain in static friction, and the kinetic friction is kept inside the brakes. In pre-2000 vehicles that didn't have ABS brakes, you would have to manually pump your brake pedal to get the same result.

  • @maymanist
    @maymanist 5 лет назад

    Short and sweet!

  • @calday2136
    @calday2136 7 месяцев назад

    Thank you

  • @sizosibanda5246
    @sizosibanda5246 6 лет назад

    I do not understand why any will click the dislike button on videos like these

  • @torrid94
    @torrid94 5 лет назад

    This guy is really amazing.

  • @jamesguansing9457
    @jamesguansing9457 3 года назад

    Crash Course left the group.

  • @noobff1041
    @noobff1041 4 года назад +2

    plz make live class,,

  • @Abolba
    @Abolba 3 года назад

    The most precise illustration circular motion. I went through this in my Physics lessons years ago and yet, this lecture simplified it much more than the rest. Keep up the good work, Professor! You're making a huge difference in academic circles. :)

  • @asliceofpi5933
    @asliceofpi5933 3 года назад +1

    if the string is 2.0 metres long doesn't that mean the radius should be 2.0/2π as 2πr = circumference?

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  3 года назад

      The length of the string is the radius.

    • @asliceofpi5933
      @asliceofpi5933 3 года назад

      @@ProfessorDaveExplains Ah, silly mistake from me there! Thanks for the reply

  • @mansauce2978
    @mansauce2978 Год назад

    wouldnt it be 25*0.5*/1 because the string is 2 meters long and we need teh radius which is half

  • @KlevenkempDeza-pi2hz
    @KlevenkempDeza-pi2hz Год назад

    Ty for the video really good 👍

  • @walker308
    @walker308 5 лет назад

    good stuff my dude !

  • @lucynavarro7363
    @lucynavarro7363 6 лет назад +2

    god bless you mannnn

  • @suzumii2998
    @suzumii2998 Год назад

    shouldnt the answer of question be 6.25N instead of 6.3N?

  • @bluskyebasta4801
    @bluskyebasta4801 4 года назад +1

    if you were my teacher I would have already taken all the exams.

    • @Rob-J-BJJ
      @Rob-J-BJJ 4 года назад +3

      what does that even mean lol

  • @elleb6018
    @elleb6018 3 года назад

    Thanks

  • @DegenJayy
    @DegenJayy 3 года назад

    Clutch

  • @prititoppo4205
    @prititoppo4205 7 лет назад

    sir pls upload a video on dimension and units tricks for engineering students.

  • @udaychauhan2312
    @udaychauhan2312 6 лет назад

    Is Change in momentum = centripetal force ?
    What is change in momentum conceptual based?
    momentum is centrifugal force?
    Thanks sir give ans please not clearly understand sir

    • @carultch
      @carultch 3 года назад

      Rate of change in momentum = net force
      When the rate of change in momentum is entirely perpendicular to the velocity, that rate of change in momentum is the force that causes centripetal acceleration.
      Centrifugal force is a fictitious force, that is a consequence of looking at this problem from within a reference frame in circular motion, rather than from the inertial reference frame. What it really is, is a body's tendency to proceed in straight line, reacting to a force that attempts to accelerate it inward, and assuming (incorrectly) that it is due to a force that attempts to pull it outward. That apparent force attempting to pull it outward, is the centrifugal psuedoforce.

  • @josephjoe9525
    @josephjoe9525 4 года назад

    Waittt so a lower tangential speed means that an object travelled only for a short distance, then why is it that the centripetal acceleration increases as it gets closer to the center? I'm kinda confused

    • @carultch
      @carultch 2 года назад

      If you fix the tangential speed between examples, closer to the center means a greater centripetal acceleration. It is inversely proportional to the radius, a=v^2/r.
      If you fix the period of rotation between examples, which is equivalent to fixing the angular speed, closer to the center means less centripetal acceleration. It is proportional to the radius, a=omega^2*r.

  • @blessedtwins3255
    @blessedtwins3255 4 года назад

    Nice one bro... 👍

  • @themarvellous
    @themarvellous Год назад

    I am regretting why didn't I watch this video in my exams time

  • @joaovaldez8508
    @joaovaldez8508 7 лет назад +1

    Wait for the equation how come you didnt divide the distance by 2 for radius?

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  7 лет назад

      how do you mean?

    • @xc4509
      @xc4509 7 лет назад

      Wouldn't the radius equal 1m, if the string is 2m long?

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  7 лет назад +5

      but you don't hold the middle of the string, you hold the end of the string.

  • @muneebshuja7804
    @muneebshuja7804 3 года назад

    good video

  • @tGoldenPhoenix
    @tGoldenPhoenix 2 года назад

    Done.

  • @dorami601
    @dorami601 Год назад

    falling down from a height always is something that always stop me to sit in this. 😅

  • @umbra_bae
    @umbra_bae 2 года назад

    thank you

  • @wabbles
    @wabbles 3 года назад

    encountered this concept many times since high school. im now on my second year in engineering and still needs to review this HAHA. (and i know this wont be my last)
    thank you professor dave!

  • @abdelrahmanbeyrouti9721
    @abdelrahmanbeyrouti9721 9 месяцев назад

    i am physics teacher, i wonder how do you do these animations

  • @jimmywong5869
    @jimmywong5869 6 лет назад

    why the force will pull the object inwards?

  • @anthonodi5310
    @anthonodi5310 2 года назад

    Thank you Physics Jesus

  • @vignesh9269
    @vignesh9269 7 лет назад +1

    sir, can you make a video on non inertial frames

    • @ajinkyadeshpande6271
      @ajinkyadeshpande6271 7 лет назад

      Vignesh Nithyanandam
      non inertial frame of reference do not follow Newton's laws of motion
      are u from SSC board

    • @vignesh9269
      @vignesh9269 7 лет назад

      Ajinkya Deshpande i am from cbse mam

    • @carultch
      @carultch 3 года назад

      @@ajinkyadeshpande6271 It isn't that non-inertial frames of reference "do not follow Newton's laws of motion", they still do. It is just that you have the acceleration of the reference frame to account for, something that is not immediately obvious, which will feel like it is a fictitious force.

  • @remington8617
    @remington8617 4 года назад

    My physics teacher showed this to the class

  • @ero9981
    @ero9981 2 года назад

    Speedrunning this du du du duu