Practice of Architecture: Understanding Sec. 25 of R.A. 9266 and its Characteristics.

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 янв 2025

Комментарии • 38

  • @archwaldo
    @archwaldo 3 года назад +10

    The course curriculum has to be updated to include ARCHITECTURAL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND MARKETING.
    Ito po kasi ang isa sa mga reasons na laganap ang inconsistency sa advertisement and marketing ng mga architectural works.
    Ang tinuturo sa mga paaralan currently is mostly on the design and practice side lang. Walang topics on how to start and grow your career on the business side of things.
    Magaling ka nga mag-disenyo, pero kung hindi mo naman alam paano mag promote at magtakbo ng negosyo eh hindi mo mama-maximize ang exposure ng iyong kakayahan bilang arkitekto.

  • @artemplatesales
    @artemplatesales 4 года назад +5

    maestro sana po mapunta sa mainstream media eto pong video mo po para po malaman ng public

  • @jennicadantes3508
    @jennicadantes3508 4 года назад +4

    Kung sanang ino-honor ng lahat ang batas natin.. ang sarap sanang (lalong) maging arkitekto sa Pilipinas.

    • @Ma3stro-752
      @Ma3stro-752  4 года назад +2

      Totoo yan.. At kung lahat din ng mga Arkitekto ay tapat sa sinumpaang tungkulin na hindi rin mag violate ng sariling batas.

  • @landodeniega3666
    @landodeniega3666 4 года назад +2

    While watching this, it now inspires me to continue study architecture. More subs to come sir. Thank you.

  • @williammedina8944
    @williammedina8944 4 года назад +1

    Thank you for sharing, Architect.

  • @vera8082
    @vera8082 11 месяцев назад

    simula po nung naipatupad ang RA 9266, meron na po bang real life cases na lumabag sa rule 4 ng ra 9266? if meron po, ano po yung cases na yun?

  • @jgalisaarchitects8225
    @jgalisaarchitects8225 11 месяцев назад

    Hello sir, if n case ginamit po ang isang approved design concept ng isang arkitekto doon sa contractor na walang paalam at pinatayo...paglabag napo sa intellectual property pero sa contractor pinagawa ang contract design documents.ano po mapapayo mo maestro...?

  • @cocoXavier7
    @cocoXavier7 3 года назад

    Thank you po😊

  • @clydetupas8141
    @clydetupas8141 2 года назад

    is design-build part of the scope of the architect's professional services? some are insisting that architects still need pcab even doing design-build.

    • @Ma3stro-752
      @Ma3stro-752  2 года назад

      ruclips.net/video/R9F1Bge_b9o/видео.html

  • @madinemortela2193
    @madinemortela2193 4 года назад +1

    Sir curious po ako for company employees who are working as draftsmen for outsourcing business?

  • @oellejoven1758
    @oellejoven1758 3 года назад

    Question if I already passed the board exam however I was not able to take oath because of my JOb, as referring to your statement " not able to take oath" Thanks and Regards..

  • @suvii.i
    @suvii.i 4 года назад +1

    thank you sa bestfriend ko nalaman ko yung yt account nyo po ♥️♥️♥️

  • @rommelrecopuerto4169
    @rommelrecopuerto4169 4 года назад

    Good am sir...What if yung pineprepare mong plans no title block and not use for the erection of any building or structure....technically it cannot be signed because it is not considered to be "architectural documents" but merely CAD Plans and Visuals....No word pertaining to architecture, scope of architecture or architectural designer...I mean di ba practice of architecture has a lot of scope and Visuals falls short for "architecture practice" just solitation for practice of CAD and 3D Visuals. Our services is not architectural practice but CAD drawings and Visuals how can we go about it? If we can't publish our works as such even without architects and engineers doesn't it violates our right to express our ideas.

    • @Ma3stro-752
      @Ma3stro-752  4 года назад +1

      You may check your FB Messenger

    • @rommelrecopuerto4169
      @rommelrecopuerto4169 4 года назад

      @@Ma3stro-752 Actually I interpreted the RA9266 on my own comprehension and thought it was ok, thank you for the detailed clarification. I have already put down my own video a very sour mistake and needs apology from you and the architects involved in the chatter.... Thanks for the amount of time you have given on my dilemma will do better and arrange everything on my part accordingly. Big thanks sir and more power to you.....idol!!!!!!

  • @pithecophagajefferyi7460
    @pithecophagajefferyi7460 4 года назад

    Covered po ba tayo ng "No to PM sent" rule ng DTI?

    • @Ma3stro-752
      @Ma3stro-752  4 года назад +2

      For our services no, because we should not offer our professional fees direclty to fb wall, our code of ethics prohibits us to engage in dealing without written service agreement.

    • @pithecophagajefferyi7460
      @pithecophagajefferyi7460 4 года назад

      ​@@Ma3stro-752 Thank you po sir. May I ask permission to quote you If I use this statement?

    • @Ma3stro-752
      @Ma3stro-752  4 года назад +1

      @@pithecophagajefferyi7460 Quote the provision in the Code of Ethics. You may just make ma a reference.

  • @clintjosol9714
    @clintjosol9714 3 года назад +1

    Hello po Maestro! Just a clarification. If not yet considered as licensed architect, is it illegal to post on social media (specifically on Instagram) regarding your rendering/ visualization works just for PORTFOLIO purposes? Thank you in advance! 😊

    • @Ma3stro-752
      @Ma3stro-752  3 года назад +1

      If it is for portfolio why need to post in social media if you are not soliciting works?

    • @clintjosol9714
      @clintjosol9714 3 года назад +1

      ​@@Ma3stro-752 I posted on social media in order to showcase my works because many also have done this. I never offered rendering services but there are times I helped my friends in their plates. I also plan to accept rendering commissions. But just to be sure, is it okay to accept rendering/ visualization commissions for, let us say, school works or for a family relative who is an architect and ask you to render his/her project? Thank you! 😅😊

    • @Ma3stro-752
      @Ma3stro-752  3 года назад +2

      @@clintjosol9714 you may, you can even accept works from an Architect there is no problem with that, it is like an Architect is extending his support group to those freelance renderers or cad Drafters, as long that the works is directly from the Architect and under with his or her charge and supervision. What is prohibited as unlawful is for those students who solicit works to a prospective clients, if that happens you are now encroaching to the practice of those Architects. (Hope that was cleared discuss to your professional practice subject).

    • @clintjosol9714
      @clintjosol9714 3 года назад +1

      @@Ma3stro-752 THANK YOU FOR THIS MAESTRO! I'm very much enlightened! Rooting for your channel! 😄👍

    • @Ma3stro-752
      @Ma3stro-752  3 года назад +1

      @@clintjosol9714 you're welcome.

  • @archtravellife8645
    @archtravellife8645 4 года назад

    Hi Sir, I am a longtime expat
    and I am planning to continue and practice my profession when I come back. Am I still allowed since I have not renewed my registration license for years now? I stopped attending CPD’s which I understand is a requirement for renewal of the license. I am not an active member of any chapter here. What is the best thing for me to do to renew and practice again. I really appreciate your reply in advance. Thank you for sharing your knowledge Architect Maestro. You always educate and inspire me.

    • @Ma3stro-752
      @Ma3stro-752  4 года назад +1

      Just pay your long standing overdue IAPOA sa UAP then renew po.

    • @archtravellife8645
      @archtravellife8645 4 года назад

      A coffee talk with Maestro Many thanks Architect for your prompt reply. However, I have not updated my UAP membership for a long time. Should I be a member before renewing?

    • @archtravellife8645
      @archtravellife8645 4 года назад

      Thank you very much for your help and effort Sir. Kudos to you and more power to your vlog and advocacy.

  • @janedavid4645
    @janedavid4645 4 года назад +1

    Let's face reality po sir. Esp. this advertisement Wala Ng sumusunod.
    And SA mga mkakapanood pa Sana lahat Ng nabanggit Ni sir ma apply natin SA mga magiging arkitekto palang wag Sana Tayo dadagdag SA mga illegal practitioners and violators

    • @Ma3stro-752
      @Ma3stro-752  4 года назад +2

      I agree with you Arch. Jane, yan nga ang palagi kung sinasabi that if we want really to feel the essence of our law, we should start it by ourselves, wag natin tingnan ang violation lg ng OBO and CEs, dahil ang bumuhay din sa CEs minsan is those illegal practitioner, kumakagat sa sign and seal ng mga CEs.

    • @janedavid4645
      @janedavid4645 4 года назад +1

      A coffee talk with Maestro soon to be Arch. Palang PO sir. A big privilege na makausap po Kayo.
      Salamat po . Gusto ko Lang po na like you po na maging Isa SA mga nagsasabuhay at sinusunod po Yung law Ng Architecture. Madalas po Kasi halos PO Kasi Ng mismong magiging Architekto Ang pumapatay PO mismo SA profession po natin Sir.

    • @Ma3stro-752
      @Ma3stro-752  4 года назад +1

      @@janedavid4645 yes Future Architect Jane, kaya since then I am advocating this when we started before our chapter to send notices of violation in coordination with the NBI bacolod, but I don't know now what happen. Sabi ko nga wag lg ako bibigyan ng opportunity na maging member ng PRBOA 🤭😜😜 dahil malayo naman mangyari... Hahaha

    • @janedavid4645
      @janedavid4645 4 года назад +1

      A coffee talk with Maestro i do believe in you sir. Pag Pray PO natin Yan for your advocacy Sir. Godbless you po .