Always appreciate the video's and learning from them, life can get in the way! Myself going from terrible planetary images to pretty decent ones is always rewarding, its a journey after all, but I do admit, even terrible images are exciting at the beginning.
Great video Mark. I’ve missed your tutorials the past year. You are one of a few amateur astronomers I trusted to teach me planetary and lunar imaging two years ago. I love this hobby. If I may, AS!4 just came out last week. It’s version 4.04. Same interface but it runs much faster. Image quality is is the same or maybe a little better
great video Mark! Thanks for sharing! I think astronomy is keeping us sane here :) We've had cloudy weather for weeks now and I can tell you I'm at my wit's end 😢 Anyway i'm just going through your Winjupos video for pointers, the weather might be better next week I want to be prepared to capture jupiter. Thanks for that video too BTW!
So glad you’re finding them useful but sorry to hear your weather is awful. This El Niño year is proving to be quite something isn’t it? Hoping your skies clear soon.
@@RefreshingViews yes it was, I was on FSTA. Great to see your videos on here. Very useful. Been playing around with astrophotography for about 10 years but only recently got the time and equipment to start getting serious.
Hi Mark, nice video. I didn’t see a comparison of using WINJUPOS vs not. We have pretty bad seeing where I am North America (Vermont) and I’ve tried taking advantage of WINJUPOS with my asi224MC camera, but honestly I never see any benefits. The stacked WINJUPOS image is typically no better than the best of my individual stacked and processed images. My brother, also in North America (Michigan) has significantly better seeing, uses the same camera, and can’t see a benefit either. I’m curious as to the differences you might be seeing. I can certainly understand why a mono-shooter needs WINJUPOS given the various filters and the need to align the features which are moving pretty quickly on Jupiter. In any case, it would be nice to show with/without WINJUPOS and how things are improved. It could be that we just don’t have good enough seeing or our techniques are wanting.
Hi Terri - hope you are well. Have you tried a gentle sharpening of the derotated image? I put mine into Photoshop and give it a gentle unsharp mask and it reveals further fine details without, importantly, bringing out the noise. I'll add it to my next video (just doing a detailed version of the Saturn processing click by click!).
Hi Mark, we’re well, albeit cold, here in Vermont. We’ve had a cold start to winter along with our normal blanketed skies in November and December. We hope to see you in February at WSP24. In reading what you wrote, and look forward to your next video, but not entirely clear on what you’re suggesting. Are you suggesting WINJUPOS on a single video stream with sharpening or multiple video streams? I’ve tried it on multiple streams in a sequence, and then stacking and sharpening those images to no better result. I typically do not apply sharpening to individual stacks prior to WINJUPOS and final stacking of the various derotated results. For me, I can likely chalk things up to horrible seeing, but my brother gets decent seeing in Michigan/USA and sees nothing much better.
Great Video! Should I use my ASI183MC Pro for planetary imaging or my ASI120MC? Does it matter? I ask because the 120MC is called a planetary cam. But the 183MC is a step up in quality. I usually use the 120MC as a guide cam. Thanks again!
Not sure without reading the specs. There is an online calculator (somewhere) that calculates the best pixels for your scope aperture and f-ratio. Try it and let us know how you get on!
Hello. Mark nice that your back with ever more interesting content, with such digital control over image content information on such images is there a possibility of that detail information being corrupted.
Cheers John. You’re right, in fact the BAA ALPO and other professional bodies won’t take images produced with AI algorithms for fear of introducing artefacts and false information - even though it’s pleasing to the eye.
What sort of frame rate are you capturing with Mark? I seem to be able to get a faster rate using Sharpcap at the same settings ie: gain, exposure and ROI.
I think I am getting 50 fps with Saturn ie 20millisec exposures. I normally go for 10ms on Jupiter but it is so much brighter. Interesting that you get faster data through Sharpcap as I would expect the two software tools to give equal performance (all things being equal). I will have to try this out next time.
Great work! What do you think of collaborating with us? We are producing a video and photo editing plugin called Dehancer. If you are interested, how could we get in touch?
Always appreciate the video's and learning from them, life can get in the way! Myself going from terrible planetary images to pretty decent ones is always rewarding, its a journey after all, but I do admit, even terrible images are exciting at the beginning.
Yes totally agree - it’s great fun isn’t it (and even more important when life is getting in the way!!).
Great video Mark. I’ve missed your tutorials the past year. You are one of a few amateur astronomers I trusted to teach me planetary and lunar imaging two years ago. I love this hobby. If I may, AS!4 just came out last week. It’s version 4.04. Same interface but it runs much faster. Image quality is is the same or maybe a little better
That is so kind of you, Craig. Thank you! Gosh I had missed the new AutoStakkert. I will check it out, thanks for the heads up.
Lovely comment Craig, i see good things for you and your imaging, i was doing lots of the same a few years ago. All the best mate.
Damo
Great to see a new video Mark excellent quick tutorial and finale image, looking forward to your next videos
Cheers Tony - it's been a while and thank you for your kind words.
great video Mark! Thanks for sharing! I think astronomy is keeping us sane here :) We've had cloudy weather for weeks now and I can tell you I'm at my wit's end 😢 Anyway i'm just going through your Winjupos video for pointers, the weather might be better next week I want to be prepared to capture jupiter. Thanks for that video too BTW!
So glad you’re finding them useful but sorry to hear your weather is awful. This El Niño year is proving to be quite something isn’t it? Hoping your skies clear soon.
Wonderful Mark. I'm a deep sky guy myself, whereas the processing is different. Thinking I should give this a go!
Glad you enjoyed it Gerard - it was great fun putting it together. Do let us know how you get on.
Great video Mark. Great to see you showing free software and what it can do. (Nice to hear about the contacts too. I used to work with you)
Hi Rob - was that at FRA / CAvS? Clear skies to you!
@@RefreshingViews yes it was, I was on FSTA. Great to see your videos on here. Very useful. Been playing around with astrophotography for about 10 years but only recently got the time and equipment to start getting serious.
Thanks Mark for another excellent video, I had wondered were you had been recently.
Cheers Peter - glad you enjoyed it.
Really great video! Thanks! Saturn can be tricky to get nice and sharp this is so helpful
Thanks Christian. Not helped of course by being still relatively low from the northern hemisphere.
Hi Mark, nice video. I didn’t see a comparison of using WINJUPOS vs not. We have pretty bad seeing where I am North America (Vermont) and I’ve tried taking advantage of WINJUPOS with my asi224MC camera, but honestly I never see any benefits. The stacked WINJUPOS image is typically no better than the best of my individual stacked and processed images. My brother, also in North America (Michigan) has significantly better seeing, uses the same camera, and can’t see a benefit either. I’m curious as to the differences you might be seeing. I can certainly understand why a mono-shooter needs WINJUPOS given the various filters and the need to align the features which are moving pretty quickly on Jupiter. In any case, it would be nice to show with/without WINJUPOS and how things are improved. It could be that we just don’t have good enough seeing or our techniques are wanting.
Hi Terri - hope you are well. Have you tried a gentle sharpening of the derotated image? I put mine into Photoshop and give it a gentle unsharp mask and it reveals further fine details without, importantly, bringing out the noise. I'll add it to my next video (just doing a detailed version of the Saturn processing click by click!).
Hi Mark, we’re well, albeit cold, here in Vermont. We’ve had a cold start to winter along with our normal blanketed skies in November and December. We hope to see you in February at WSP24. In reading what you wrote, and look forward to your next video, but not entirely clear on what you’re suggesting. Are you suggesting WINJUPOS on a single video stream with sharpening or multiple video streams? I’ve tried it on multiple streams in a sequence, and then stacking and sharpening those images to no better result. I typically do not apply sharpening to individual stacks prior to WINJUPOS and final stacking of the various derotated results. For me, I can likely chalk things up to horrible seeing, but my brother gets decent seeing in Michigan/USA and sees nothing much better.
Thanks mate! I'm an amateur myself. I have the Celestron Nexstar 8 its a sweet telescope 🔭 but I got the bug an am always lookin to upgrade 😂
Glad I could help - it’s a slippery slope!!
Great Video! Should I use my ASI183MC Pro for planetary imaging or my ASI120MC? Does it matter? I ask because the 120MC is called a planetary cam. But the 183MC is a step up in quality. I usually use the 120MC as a guide cam. Thanks again!
Not sure without reading the specs. There is an online calculator (somewhere) that calculates the best pixels for your scope aperture and f-ratio. Try it and let us know how you get on!
Really cool :) Saturn, quite the beauty++
Yes, I always like Saturn. Although it is pretty I do find it quite undramatic compared to say Jupiter.
Hello. Mark nice that your back with ever more interesting content, with such digital control over image content information on such images is there a possibility of that detail information being corrupted.
Cheers John. You’re right, in fact the BAA ALPO and other professional bodies won’t take images produced with AI algorithms for fear of introducing artefacts and false information - even though it’s pleasing to the eye.
Nice work Mark
Cheers Kevin hope you’re well.
That's absolutely amazing!
Thank you!
Good job with Saturn!
Thank you!
Beautiful! What focuser do you use and how is it attached to your telescope?
It’s the standard OVL / Skywatcher SCT Crayford focuser. I’ve bodged a SW autofocuser using a 3D printed bracket for vibration free focusing.
@@RefreshingViews Thanks!
Hermoso Saturno
Gracias - si, tienes razon.
very nice
Thank you!
What sort of frame rate are you capturing with Mark? I seem to be able to get a faster rate using Sharpcap at the same settings ie: gain, exposure and ROI.
I think I am getting 50 fps with Saturn ie 20millisec exposures. I normally go for 10ms on Jupiter but it is so much brighter. Interesting that you get faster data through Sharpcap as I would expect the two software tools to give equal performance (all things being equal). I will have to try this out next time.
Great work!
What do you think of collaborating with us?
We are producing a video and photo editing plugin called Dehancer.
If you are interested, how could we get in touch?
Thank you for reaching out. That sounds really exciting - drop me a line at mark at refreshing views dot com.
lies we have a p1000