After all these years, I think I've realised why Arthur and Joseph's souls escaped the Woman in Black in the afterlife, and it's not because of Arthur's late wife watching over them nor because of Arthur's effort to put the WIB to rest. It's because Arthur physically managed to try saving his son, something Jennet was unable to do when her child drowned in the marsh and something all the parents of her subsequent victims weren't there to do.
You have to think about this ending to get it. "I will never forget" was what you heard the Woman say. But then, you think about this. She took Arthur's child, knowing that Arthur will go after him, and reunited him with his wife, and his whole family was back together. It was a good, scary and sad ending at the same movie. It defies all movies. Thumbs up if you agree
@@lovmi2byz91 in this case because he was so miserable without his wife it was as though the woman in black did him a kind of favour I mean they were all reunited. However in the 1989 film Arthur’s wife is alive and the woman in black kills them all. The book is totally different Arthur survived.
She wasn't trying to "repay" Arthur as a thank-you gesture. She made it clear she would never forgive and her eternal goal is to kill all the children in the village. Arthur interrupted her plan to force Joseph to commit suicide by sacrificing himself to try and save him. At the end his wife and Joseph's mom took them to heaven with her and the woman in black watched in anger since her plan was ruined. In all honesty, if I was Sam I'd toss the body back in the marsh and burn the mansion down.
She did not intend for them to reunite. But you can tell by her face, she wished she could have that same ending. But if you remember the scene when Arthur lured her to her son, the boy said "No, I want my mother." She was angry. Even though in the book, the boy began to get real close to her before he died. The face isn't so much scary as it is sad. She wants to be free but she can never forget or forgive what happened during her life.
Claire is right. The women black purpose of killing arthur and his son because he wanted to reunite them with his wife just like he did with her son. Through this she was saying thank you
That is completely wrong she never looked at the body of her son ever in the movie she just attacked Author and remember shes a spirit built on revenge NEVER FORGIVE she will never truly be satisfied and will continue to kill Children forever so they kn her pain she saw this as a win for she killed Author and the boy since she knew his plan to save his child from her was never gonna work in turn got both his and her soul something shes never done before getting an adult soul
Actually this is quite wrong. When Arthur rescued the boy and prepared him with the cards and the necklace, most ppl didn’t hear this, but he said to her ‘your not my mummy’ so she was mad at Arthur because she subsequently thought it was his fault, so she attempted to kill his son but she failed and they were reunited instead. Not trying to be mean tho I thought this at first.
in the original novel, Arthur got married and had a kid AFTER he had settled the affair and got back to London. he thought the haunting of the woman in black had ended but then she reappeared and both his wife and the kid died, leaving Arthur alone in agony i like the movie ending a lot better
Interesting note: in an earlier cut/mix of this film (one I believe has found its way online), during the scene where Daniel 'reunites' her with her son, you can hear a child's voice screaming, "No! No, you're not my mother!" This isn't included in the final theatrical/DVD/Blu-ray mix of the film. Which I find interesting. It changes the dynamic. Imagine the already insane Woman's intense feelings after being reunited with her son only for him to reject her.
This scene was so sad :'( And the ending with the two of them walking away was just like the ending of the last play I did, with the main character who died walking away hand in hand with the muse that inspired him. I'm about to cry :'(
I saw this movie when I was four and I’m 13 now and I’ve been looking for this movie since I was seven and this scene always scared the absolute crap out of me but I finally found the movie I feel accomplished
Santino Palmese oh no sorry I forgot to mention that I had a dream with the train scene in it and it just happened randomly when I was seven and I remembered that It was a movie that I saw but I couldn’t remember which one and I just started looking for it
I've come to realize that the woman is scary only until then, because the make her seem so gruesome and scary when she's trying to scare people or kill them, but here it's like you can truly see her jealously and sadness that she didn't get the ending she wanted as she watches them walk off. I know she's kind a bitch, but I feel sorry for her.
so sad...i really cried...it's so emotionall.i think arthur it's a great parent because he jumped in front of the train to save his children's live.it's a dark story with a different ending.i think is one of the best horror i've seen in these years,because the films of this genre of films has been fooled!!! :)
When I first saw this movie in the theater, during the scene when Jeanette's spirit went towards her son's body I swore I heard the little boy say "no stay away from me". Which is why she turned around angry to Arthur. But once the movie came out on DVD the little boy's voice was gone...cut from the scene🙄🤔. So before the movie went to DVD I was telling people she's still angry because her son's spirit rejected her. But they altered the scene so it just looks like she's angry just to be angry....
You know the reason the woman in black did this was because. Kipps reunited The Woman with her son. The woman knew Kipps wanted to see his wife again so what she did was what she was good at. Also I cannot be the only one who cried during this scene right? Like seriously this was sad as fuck.
At least Arthur was reunited with his wife and their boy was with them. Imagine, if the boy had died and Arthur had stayed alive - it would have been horrible for him, first losing his wife and now losing his son.
I flipped in the cinema. I just lost it. When Joseph walked away: God, I was just cursing and swearing and hating the movie and everything, Jesus, it was the best thing ever but hell, oh, I still can't get over it... I'm glad Arthur, his wife and Joseph are together in the end, like a sort of "happy ending", otherwise I wouldn't have survived xD
There's just one thing I don't understand, how did Arthur not notice that his son just pulled away from him and started walking towards the train? I mean, if u look carefully, you'll see that Arthur was holding Joseph's hand firmly, and yet the boy just softly pulled away. Or was that also supposed to be the work of the woman in Black?
I assume he thought "Oh, my son let go of my hand, but he is not darting onto the tracks in front of the incoming train" though with all that´s happened in the story he should have been a lot more alert than that lol
There was nothing scary about those last seconds. I thought it would the way people were talking about it. But then again, most of them were kids. Her face is like anger mixed with sadness. Angry that she couldn't have the boy's soul. Sad because her rage and hate for everyone prevents her from moving on and truly being with her son and achieving the same peace as Arthur.
She only think of her needs and neglect to think perhaps others share her care for their own offspring. The end scene made me smile cause from that moment she knew that is it. Kibbs lived his life in oppression and been penniless, and without his wife to care for him and Joe. It's like Fate spit on that B*tch's face who thinks killing the Kipps can satisfy her loneliness but no, it made HER knew she can never have what the Kipps have, released from earthly burden to be with his family.
I don't agree with the idea the Woman did this to him and his son to "return the favor." I see the ending as similar to The Ring: despite a noble effort, the spirit won't be appeased or move on. The brief scene where the camera moves through the house as her voice says, "Never forgive. Never, never forgive" strongly suggests she is still evil. Besides, ending a child's life is heinous, full stop. Not a gift, even if it does reunite him with his deceased mother.
Definitely! I think this is probably the most satisfying punishment I have ever seen one of these horror movie ghosts get; an eternity of loneliness, denied forever the comforts of peace and love my their own selfishness. That last few seconds of her staring after the Kipps is as sweet as pie to me.
OMG IN THE MOVIES WHEN SHE SCREAMED AT THIS SCENE JUMPED OUT OF MY SEAT SAYING HOLY S*** HER VOICE IS SO HIGH. ANOTHER SCENE WAS WHEN SHE LOOKS AT U I THOUGHT IM GOING TO DIE NEXT
That's because the curse wasn't about her son being lost in the marsh, it was about him dying in the first place ... when both the parents and the driver lived. The curse will never end so long as she has the energy to keep haunting. And, as far as the ending goes ... she gave them the last flicker of her mercy. It was actually a nice thing to do, from a ghost's perspective. In that one instance both father and son were "pure" enough to be able to meet up with the wife/mother. My 2 cents.
I'm still not sure how to interpret the ending. I definitely surprised me; i just kinda sat there staring at the tv in shock when the train hit them. On one hand, i kinda thought she was repaying him. But on the other hand, she did say she would never forgive, and surely she couldn't have known Arthur would go after him. I think when he died too, she couldn't take the child and that's why the family was reunited. Brutal but actually happy ending, to me.
I'm not sure what to believe about Jennet's motivation in this. It's probably more likely that she simply meant to take Joseph and didn't anticipate Arthur's intervention. But at the same time, Jennet was there each time Arthur attempted to save all those other kids, so maybe she had an inkling that he would be willing to sacrifice himself, especially to save his own child. The optimistic part of me wants to believe that she was trying to thank Arthur for reuniting her with her son.
he didn't die by voldemort.... he didn't die by nagini.... he didn't die by basilisk.... he didn't die by a dragon... he didn't die by professor quirel... he didn't die by a troll.. he didn't die by spiders... he didn't die by inferis..... and he died by a train.... omg wtf?????? hahahahhahahahaha
I kind of saw it a bit different than most. I think she was grateful towards Arthur, and rewarded him by giving him the one thing he really wanted: For him, his son, and his wife to be together again. However bittersweet the result may be. Notice how Jennet looks towards them, longing to be like them, to some extent. And really, does Arthur look upset to be dead? It's not a horrible ending. However... Everyone in that town is fucked beyond belief. I'd move. Like....immediately!
@humbl3fact I thought about it but apparently that wasn't the case, James Watkins said that she didn't do this for Arthur but for revange. She's can't forget and forgive what happens...that's what i've heard. But i had the same point of you at first.
They setup the sam and arthur relationship so well, i was hoping it would just end with arthur accepting sam and his wife into his own family. Sam finding a surrogate son in arthur
Maybe it was her goal to kill not just the kid, but Kipps too. A kind of "reward" of her own, the only thing she could do in fact. She could have knew(one way or another) that Kipps wife was still around, and could have wanted to reunite the family. Or, as people say, she planned to take the kid(because she reeeeaaaaally love kids) and things got f*cked up for her instead. Or a human(but extreme) move, or a foiled plan. Thing is... she's still alone. With those kids she definetly has no idea what to do with.
+Pelerin4129 Keep in mind bro even though he buried the kid with the woman she still comes back because she NEVER forgives. In other words she will NEVER gain peace.
Me and my friend have this theory. She made the child go on the tracks because she knew his father would go to save him, but they would both end up dead. Since his wife already passed away, the woman in balck reunited his family because he reunited her with her son. But thats just what we THINK.
Jumpscare: The Movie. But then they try to end it subtly with a “slight-movement-scare” that absolutely doesn’t work because of the entire movie preceding it.
Now that i've seen the ending more than once it's so much better then the original 1889 ending. Cause in the original him, his son, the nanny and I guess her kid are in a boat. He sees the woman on the water and then all of these trees come crashing down on the boat and they all die. You see the broken broken boat floating in the water. Movie.Ends. This had a much better ending.
the entire theatre started clapping when daniel looked up holding joseph after the train went by kuz they thought they were alive. NOPE JUST KIDDING THEYRE DEAD. i cried....
dude i totally agree, thats what my parody video of it is about, i made it pointing out the fact that he saved her baby but she still ends up killing him.. so messed up
There's a movie called Chandramuki.....it's a tamil movie......on a quick analysis u think this might as well win being as the most scariest film of all time.......
After all these years, I think I've realised why Arthur and Joseph's souls escaped the Woman in Black in the afterlife, and it's not because of Arthur's late wife watching over them nor because of Arthur's effort to put the WIB to rest. It's because Arthur physically managed to try saving his son, something Jennet was unable to do when her child drowned in the marsh and something all the parents of her subsequent victims weren't there to do.
Yeah because Arthur actually was able to at least try, while nobody else had a chance, she can't do anything to them.
Yes that's the point 🤔
oh harry potter and his train stations
There’s a rumor that the little boy is actually Daniels Godson 💙🥺
Also Abeforth Dumbledore is in this movie 💙💙💙💙💙
He doesn't have a car
I smile at Daniel hugging his son every time......
That is actually Daniels Godson Misha!
You have to think about this ending to get it. "I will never forget" was what you heard the Woman say. But then, you think about this. She took Arthur's child, knowing that Arthur will go after him, and reunited him with his wife, and his whole family was back together. It was a good, scary and sad ending at the same movie. It defies all movies. Thumbs up if you agree
Yes that’s what I thought
She didn't do it out of kindness. She wanted Arthur to suffer
@@lovmi2byz91 in this case because he was so miserable without his wife it was as though the woman in black did him a kind of favour I mean they were all reunited. However in the 1989 film Arthur’s wife is alive and the woman in black kills them all. The book is totally different Arthur survived.
thats why i love this movie in a bittersweet way after the films of harry potter
She wasn't trying to "repay" Arthur as a thank-you gesture. She made it clear she would never forgive and her eternal goal is to kill all the children in the village. Arthur interrupted her plan to force Joseph to commit suicide by sacrificing himself to try and save him. At the end his wife and Joseph's mom took them to heaven with her and the woman in black watched in anger since her plan was ruined.
In all honesty, if I was Sam I'd toss the body back in the marsh and burn the mansion down.
Good interpretation ❤️
Agreed. Jennet doesn’t even care about her son anymore, all she cares about is her revenge. Burn the place to the ground.
I love the shot of Sam seeing the ghosts through the train windows. It's so haunting. The realisation that it's not over.
This is the most heart wrenching scene I think I have ever seen in any movie ever
i loooove this scene:
"Daddy, who's that lady?"
"that's your mommy" *-* gosh this was so freakin cute! :)
This was a wholesome ending, imo.
Draco: do i look like?!
That scream literally sent chills up my spine.
2:24 Dumbledore: "Hello, Harry. You've grown up!"
Harry: "NOT AGAIN, C'MON!--eh I mean, hello Proffesor 🤗 (shiitttt!!!!!)"
💀💀😭😭😭🤣🤣🥲🥲
Don't shed a tear cause in death they will always be together :,)
jose perez ik but the music is so beautiful it makes me cry;)
2:47, I'd laugh if Dumbledore showed up.
'..Harry, you wonderful boy, you brave, brave man..'
2:47
Voldemort was the train driver.
🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂
Best comment 😂 take my like 👍
I laughed harder than I should have
The scream is so haunting and it still scares me
She did not intend for them to reunite. But you can tell by her face, she wished she could have that same ending. But if you remember the scene when Arthur lured her to her son, the boy said "No, I want my mother." She was angry. Even though in the book, the boy began to get real close to her before he died. The face isn't so much scary as it is sad. She wants to be free but she can never forget or forgive what happened during her life.
in what book?
@@mattheww797pretty sure it's called The Woman in Black.
That's the wrong platform! You have to go back to platform 9 3/4 Harry!
🤣🤣🤣🤣😂 wright
Scary movies don't scare me anymore but I have to admit that look at the end scared the crap out of me, and I came here just to see it again.
i cant say im happy with the ending,, but i glad arthur and her son back together with his wife,, and get peace maybe:D
Claire is right. The women black purpose of killing arthur and his son because he wanted to reunite them with his wife just like he did with her son. Through this she was saying thank you
Err no. The Woman in Black killed his son becuase that's what she does....
"never forget"
That is completely wrong she never looked at the body of her son ever in the movie she just attacked Author and remember shes a spirit built on revenge NEVER FORGIVE she will never truly be satisfied and will continue to kill Children forever so they kn her pain she saw this as a win for she killed Author and the boy since she knew his plan to save his child from her was never gonna work in turn got both his and her soul something shes never done before getting an adult soul
Actually this is quite wrong. When Arthur rescued the boy and prepared him with the cards and the necklace, most ppl didn’t hear this, but he said to her ‘your not my mummy’ so she was mad at Arthur because she subsequently thought it was his fault, so she attempted to kill his son but she failed and they were reunited instead. Not trying to be mean tho I thought this at first.
@@crzycxndy6103 The Mujahid is wrong on this one, but he committed what they call an *ingenious error*
in the original novel, Arthur got married and had a kid AFTER he had settled the affair and got back to London. he thought the haunting of the woman in black had ended but then she reappeared and both his wife and the kid died, leaving Arthur alone in agony
i like the movie ending a lot better
The book sounds better. "Never forget"
Interesting note: in an earlier cut/mix of this film (one I believe has found its way online), during the scene where Daniel 'reunites' her with her son, you can hear a child's voice screaming, "No! No, you're not my mother!" This isn't included in the final theatrical/DVD/Blu-ray mix of the film. Which I find interesting. It changes the dynamic. Imagine the already insane Woman's intense feelings after being reunited with her son only for him to reject her.
What does that mean?
I watch this movie when it came to the cinema, and that scream still haunts me...
Still it is an awesome movie x)
This scene was so sad :'( And the ending with the two of them walking away was just like the ending of the last play I did, with the main character who died walking away hand in hand with the muse that inspired him. I'm about to cry :'(
🥺🥺😞😞 yes Arthur is brave man
Perfect ending!
😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢 I missed Arthur kipps in woman in black 2
I saw this movie when I was four and I’m 13 now and I’ve been looking for this movie since I was seven and this scene always scared the absolute crap out of me but I finally found the movie I
feel accomplished
Bollocks did you when you were 4 & 7 😂
Santino Palmese oh no sorry I forgot to mention that I had a dream with the train scene in it and it just happened randomly when I was seven and I remembered that It was a movie that I saw but I couldn’t remember which one and I just started looking for it
You're 17 now 🤗, possibly
When Arthur (Daniel) sees her at 1:32 she looks the most angriest/terrifying she has across the whole film, gives me the creeps. Favorite horror film
I've come to realize that the woman is scary only until then, because the make her seem so gruesome and scary when she's trying to scare people or kill them, but here it's like you can truly see her jealously and sadness that she didn't get the ending she wanted as she watches them walk off. I know she's kind a bitch, but I feel sorry for her.
so sad...i really cried...it's so emotionall.i think arthur it's a great parent because he jumped in front of the train to save his children's live.it's a dark story with a different ending.i think is one of the best horror i've seen in these years,because the films of this genre of films has been fooled!!! :)
When I first saw this movie in the theater, during the scene when Jeanette's spirit went towards her son's body I swore I heard the little boy say "no stay away from me". Which is why she turned around angry to Arthur. But once the movie came out on DVD the little boy's voice was gone...cut from the scene🙄🤔. So before the movie went to DVD I was telling people she's still angry because her son's spirit rejected her. But they altered the scene so it just looks like she's angry just to be angry....
yes, i think the last moment is about the woman in black repaying Arthur by sending them to meet his wife, it's actually kinda a 'thank you' action.
Omg! I cry so hard in this scene!
Daniel :(
it's so cute how joseph says i love u
Missing Arthur kipps in woman in black 2 angel of death 😢😢😢
You know the reason the woman in black did this was because.
Kipps reunited The Woman with her son. The woman knew Kipps wanted to see his wife again so what she did was what she was good at.
Also I cannot be the only one who cried during this scene right?
Like seriously this was sad as fuck.
At least Arthur was reunited with his wife and their boy was with them. Imagine, if the boy had died and Arthur had stayed alive - it would have been horrible for him, first losing his wife and now losing his son.
I flipped in the cinema. I just lost it. When Joseph walked away: God, I was just cursing and swearing and hating the movie and everything, Jesus, it was the best thing ever but hell, oh, I still can't get over it... I'm glad Arthur, his wife and Joseph are together in the end, like a sort of "happy ending", otherwise I wouldn't have survived xD
when i saw this part i was like "finally daniel dies in a movie"
OMG! I almost died at the cinema in this scene!!!
There's just one thing I don't understand, how did Arthur not notice that his son just pulled away from him and started walking towards the train? I mean, if u look carefully, you'll see that Arthur was holding Joseph's hand firmly, and yet the boy just softly pulled away. Or was that also supposed to be the work of the woman in Black?
I assume he thought "Oh, my son let go of my hand, but he is not darting onto the tracks in front of the incoming train"
though with all that´s happened in the story he should have been a lot more alert than that lol
Do you have kids? Many don't runaway into danger. By that age they should know what's dangerous, unless you coddle them
*heart racing at 1:15* this part scares me.
BEST SCARY MOVIE CREATED. Hands down.
when i saw this in theaters i nearly shat myself....when it comes to this type of thing i will be the first one to admit i am a pussy
The last two seconds where she looks RIGHT AT YOU messed me up so bad at the theater hahah
omg when she looks at you 3:59
thats sweet :)
when joesoph said "who's that lady?" i thought he ment the woman in black and im like oh god.
the mom looks freaky from far away
There was nothing scary about those last seconds. I thought it would the way people were talking about it. But then again, most of them were kids. Her face is like anger mixed with sadness. Angry that she couldn't have the boy's soul. Sad because her rage and hate for everyone prevents her from moving on and truly being with her son and achieving the same peace as Arthur.
i was so confused when i saw this in theaters . everyone thought that they lived but i get it now lol
this was a scary movie man!!!
I remember everyone in the theater was gasping in horror when Joseph was walking towards the train tracks.
She only think of her needs and neglect to think perhaps others share her care for their own offspring. The end scene made me smile cause from that moment she knew that is it.
Kibbs lived his life in oppression and been penniless, and without his wife to care for him and Joe. It's like Fate spit on that B*tch's face who thinks killing the Kipps can satisfy her loneliness but no, it made HER knew she can never have what the Kipps have, released from earthly burden to be with his family.
This scene KILLED ME !!!!!! On one hand they can be together on the other hand they are dead so should I be happy or sad now ?
I don't agree with the idea the Woman did this to him and his son to "return the favor." I see the ending as similar to The Ring: despite a noble effort, the spirit won't be appeased or move on. The brief scene where the camera moves through the house as her voice says, "Never forgive. Never, never forgive" strongly suggests she is still evil. Besides, ending a child's life is heinous, full stop. Not a gift, even if it does reunite him with his deceased mother.
Definitely! I think this is probably the most satisfying punishment I have ever seen one of these horror movie ghosts get; an eternity of loneliness, denied forever the comforts of peace and love my their own selfishness. That last few seconds of her staring after the Kipps is as sweet as pie to me.
harry? why do you always go to train stations when you die?
OMG IN THE MOVIES WHEN SHE SCREAMED AT THIS SCENE JUMPED OUT OF MY SEAT SAYING HOLY S*** HER VOICE IS SO HIGH.
ANOTHER SCENE WAS WHEN SHE LOOKS AT U I THOUGHT IM GOING TO DIE NEXT
That's because the curse wasn't about her son being lost in the marsh, it was about him dying in the first place ... when both the parents and the driver lived. The curse will never end so long as she has the energy to keep haunting.
And, as far as the ending goes ... she gave them the last flicker of her mercy. It was actually a nice thing to do, from a ghost's perspective. In that one instance both father and son were "pure" enough to be able to meet up with the wife/mother. My 2 cents.
Hermione & Ron and others would break down crying to see harry Go into the Afterlife 😢
man this ending always makes me cry
That ghost is so compassionate!..
Ha ha woman in black was like "shit, the one that got away" lol 😂😂
I'm still not sure how to interpret the ending. I definitely surprised me; i just kinda sat there staring at the tv in shock when the train hit them. On one hand, i kinda thought she was repaying him. But on the other hand, she did say she would never forgive, and surely she couldn't have known Arthur would go after him. I think when he died too, she couldn't take the child and that's why the family was reunited. Brutal but actually happy ending, to me.
She did him a favor:) to be with his wife
They didn't have train stations in those days. They were railway stations in the UK and railroad stations in the US.
totally agree, poor kids, scared the hell out of me
I'm not sure what to believe about Jennet's motivation in this. It's probably more likely that she simply meant to take Joseph and didn't anticipate Arthur's intervention. But at the same time, Jennet was there each time Arthur attempted to save all those other kids, so maybe she had an inkling that he would be willing to sacrifice himself, especially to save his own child. The optimistic part of me wants to believe that she was trying to thank Arthur for reuniting her with her son.
I watched this film because Daniel Radcliffe play it
i've never seen HP but dis was a good mvie with a good actor
he didn't die by voldemort.... he didn't die by nagini.... he didn't die by basilisk.... he didn't die by a dragon... he didn't die by professor quirel... he didn't die by a troll.. he didn't die by spiders... he didn't die by inferis..... and he died by a train.... omg wtf?????? hahahahhahahahaha
sindos paok I honestly want to know how long it took to type this comment 😂
I kind of saw it a bit different than most. I think she was grateful towards Arthur, and rewarded him by giving him the one thing he really wanted: For him, his son, and his wife to be together again. However bittersweet the result may be.
Notice how Jennet looks towards them, longing to be like them, to some extent.
And really, does Arthur look upset to be dead? It's not a horrible ending. However... Everyone in that town is fucked beyond belief. I'd move. Like....immediately!
legit scariest movie I've ever fucking seen. but its amazing.
@humbl3fact I thought about it but apparently that wasn't the case, James Watkins said that she didn't do this for Arthur but for revange. She's can't forget and forgive what happens...that's what i've heard. But i had the same point of you at first.
They setup the sam and arthur relationship so well, i was hoping it would just end with arthur accepting sam and his wife into his own family.
Sam finding a surrogate son in arthur
I'll never understand how she has such power over children going and committing suicide like this.
Maybe it was her goal to kill not just the kid, but Kipps too. A kind of "reward" of her own, the only thing she could do in fact. She could have knew(one way or another) that Kipps wife was still around, and could have wanted to reunite the family. Or, as people say, she planned to take the kid(because she reeeeaaaaally love kids) and things got f*cked up for her instead. Or a human(but extreme) move, or a foiled plan. Thing is... she's still alone. With those kids she definetly has no idea what to do with.
+Pelerin4129 Keep in mind bro even though he buried the kid with the woman she still comes back because she NEVER forgives. In other words she will NEVER gain peace.
Fergus The Cat Yep. That's very sad.
Ur theory is interesting, that's what I thought as well
daniel radcliffe is so hot but this movie was so scary !
Me and my friend have this theory. She made the child go on the tracks because she knew his father would go to save him, but they would both end up dead. Since his wife already passed away, the woman in balck reunited his family because he reunited her with her son. But thats just what we THINK.
Daniel radcliff is so cute
I've just watched this movie on DVD. I really want to press play again.
Jumpscare: The Movie. But then they try to end it subtly with a “slight-movement-scare” that absolutely doesn’t work because of the entire movie preceding it.
Now that i've seen the ending more than once it's so much better then the original 1889 ending. Cause in the original him, his son, the nanny and I guess her kid are in a boat. He sees the woman on the water and then all of these trees come crashing down on the boat and they all die. You see the broken broken boat floating in the water. Movie.Ends. This had a much better ending.
Did he die in this ending movie
Jennet Humfrye is The Woman in Black and Stella Kipps is The Woman in White.
I still dont understand how he didnt realize tht his so. Fucking let go of his damn hand until like 15 sec. later
he hugs his son the same way he hugs severious black
@AdventuresofFatward from far away it looked like her head was turned all the away around like in the exorcist, but yea shes really pretty
10 buck said that was the Hogwarts express
the entire theatre started clapping when daniel looked up holding joseph after the train went by kuz they thought they were alive. NOPE JUST KIDDING THEYRE DEAD. i cried....
Very cool edit.
Sam doesn't die. Arthur and his son die, which is why they can no longer see Sam and can now see the dead wife/mother.
dude i totally agree, thats what my parody video of it is about, i made it pointing out the fact that he saved her baby but she still ends up killing him.. so messed up
yeah agreed.
A king beyond the Wall?
There's a movie called Chandramuki.....it's a tamil movie......on a quick analysis u think this might as well win being as the most scariest film of all time.......
This movie came out when I was 4
Why is this so bright?
daniel crecio muchiciiicimo desde harry potter y la piedra filosofal,que recuerdos...
I luv you Daniel Radcliffe
Wait so Arthur and his boy died by a train at the end =\