Recruiting Women for Office: Why Is it Still Necessary? | 100 Years After Women's Suffrage

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 30 янв 2025

Комментарии • 91

  • @NatGeo
    @NatGeo  4 года назад +4

    Of the more than 12,000 U.S. lawmakers who have served in Congress since 1789, only 366 have been women. What's one thing you learned from this video?

    • @CasperTheCoolCat
      @CasperTheCoolCat 4 года назад +3

      I didn't sub to watch livestreams.

    • @RealityHijacked
      @RealityHijacked 4 года назад +5

      That National Geographic is under the complete and total control of "Intersectional" Post-Modernist Neo-Marxists who are actively trying to subvert Western democracies by way of full-blown cultural subversion in order to covertly bring about a totalitarian system of far-left Bolshevism under the guise of fighting for "social justice" and "equality", things that these countries have had for decades.

    • @Richie016
      @Richie016 4 года назад

      Thanks to NatGeo

    • @harkamalpreetsinghWW3
      @harkamalpreetsinghWW3 4 года назад +1

      I very much enjoyed 'The Hostile Planet' series. Please release more shows like that 🙏

  • @wrlSivan16
    @wrlSivan16 4 года назад +52

    I don’t want to be selected because I’m a woman!! I want to be selected because I’m good at my job and if I’m not, Higher someone that is. Pick people according to talent, attitude, and growth ability. Stop picking people based on gender or the color of the rainbow.
    s'il vous plaît

  • @lawjef
    @lawjef 4 года назад +50

    So you are not going to provide any data on the % of women who want to run for office who are unable to do so? And comparing that very relevant metric to the % of men who want to run for office. It may not change your conclusion but how can you have a meaningful dialogue without even devoting some time to gathering the basic foundations of an inequality argument. Or are you merely pursuing the goal of equality of outcome, regardless of circumstances, ambition, opportunities, etc. This all seems very superficial and politically driven (shout out to all the neo-Marxists who love this type of childish logic).

  • @jonathanbowen3640
    @jonathanbowen3640 4 года назад +14

    Isn't it illegal/unlawful to discriminate on basis of gender when hiring?

    • @jonathanbowen3640
      @jonathanbowen3640 4 года назад +2

      @@aholesubs1557 That's unfortunate. Pity the guys who wont get jobs purely because they are not women.

  • @Richie016
    @Richie016 4 года назад +5

    😀Remarkable video,women suffrage and participation in Politics is a fine discussion presented by Nat Geo.
    My mother has always set her best foot to contribute for such a cause too.
    Thank you NatGeo👍

  • @rezopolis
    @rezopolis 4 года назад +17

    Wow that's a whole bunch of dislikes
    Can somebody summarize the video for me? I don't have a full hour to watch it

    • @stooshiemax1756
      @stooshiemax1756 4 года назад +21

      In summary ..... Change everything to suit the needs of women.

    • @johnblackmouth
      @johnblackmouth 4 года назад +13

      Take a dump then look inside the bowl. That sums it up.

    • @rezopolis
      @rezopolis 4 года назад +2

      @@johnblackmouth guys please, i'm serious. I want to understand their argument but I'm working right now

    • @freddyb.b8120
      @freddyb.b8120 4 года назад +1

      I haven't even watched it but you can see from their faces exactly what their "points" are gonna be 😏

    • @rezopolis
      @rezopolis 4 года назад +3

      @@freddyb.b8120 wth, am i a magnet of jerks now?
      I just asked for a kind soul to tell me their core arguments dang

  • @BeBopScraBoo
    @BeBopScraBoo 4 года назад +14

    please take politics off of the natgeo channel.

    • @deanmccrorie3461
      @deanmccrorie3461 4 года назад

      Exactly. But hey. It’s election time. These Marxists tactics have to rewrite all of society to get the vote.
      They even try to mess with comic books, so this doesn’t surprise me
      I’m unsubscribing from natgeo

    • @freddyb.b8120
      @freddyb.b8120 4 года назад +1

      Welcome to the Natural Geographic Channel.
      Here with us today we have 4 hyenas, as seen on the screen in front of you 👽

  • @bothack8874
    @bothack8874 4 года назад +25

    Imagine you get job just to filled diversity checkmark in company

  • @cynthiacopland8634
    @cynthiacopland8634 4 года назад +4

    We need EVERYONE at the table for all parts of our 🇺🇸country “We gotta long way to go, baby” was the slogan in the ‘70s.

    • @ProtoNeoVintage
      @ProtoNeoVintage 4 года назад

      Remember though. Everyone means EVERYONE. Especially people you disagree with.

  • @donpreister6522
    @donpreister6522 4 года назад +3

    Interesting that twice as many people have clicked they do not like it! Maybe some are not ready to share power yet, to have equal access to the elections.. Discussion is good. Thank you!

    • @thomasmaughan4798
      @thomasmaughan4798 4 года назад

      "Maybe some are not ready to share power yet" That is certainly true of some women in public office.

  • @juice6199
    @juice6199 4 года назад +5

    It should have nothing to do with gender, rather it should have everything to do with qualification and passion for the subject.

  • @nazsalabarria860
    @nazsalabarria860 4 года назад +1

    End women’s suffrage now !!!!!

    • @amydutcher970
      @amydutcher970 4 года назад

      (house husband)
      Remember what they say ' be careful what you wish . . '

  • @ProtoNeoVintage
    @ProtoNeoVintage 4 года назад +2

    It isn't necessary. What IS necessary is recruiting competent leaders who put the well being of all the people they are leading ahead of any personal agendas. Gender and ethnicity are irrelevant.

  • @KrazyKrzysztof
    @KrazyKrzysztof 4 года назад +9

    I thought the office ended already around season 10? Top left would make a good pam

  • @nopenope7350
    @nopenope7350 4 года назад +6

    This is inane - Suffrage has always been about equal opportunity, NOT equal outcome or even equal representation! If more women want to run, they should. For a nation that is so stifling of its women, being a female sure is an important title to democrats...

  • @abhi-wi2mj
    @abhi-wi2mj 4 года назад +4

    it's just about more participation by people from every aspect of life. that no one should feel like they don't have a place in politics... why are people so butthurt in the comments

  • @thedude8046
    @thedude8046 4 года назад +11

    NO MA' AM I SAY!!

  • @RitaTheCuteFox
    @RitaTheCuteFox 4 года назад +6

    literal brain damage

  • @donlalo7079
    @donlalo7079 4 года назад +8

    I saw a sort of survivor show where one Island had only men & another only woman. Men worked well together as a team. As for the women, well...... they failed & quit.

  • @freddyb.b8120
    @freddyb.b8120 4 года назад +6

    Shutting it down.. the pity party is over. Time to get back to real life where actual problems are waiting to be solved. This ain't one of them

  • @fabiana7157
    @fabiana7157 4 года назад +6

    All the guys who dislike this video are so petty and immature, it's funny how they don't even realise that and think that disliking a video will change anything in real life lmao

    • @CasperTheCoolCat
      @CasperTheCoolCat 4 года назад

      You do realize this is National Geographic right? This is not content people what from National Geographic.

    • @fabiana7157
      @fabiana7157 4 года назад +4

      @@CasperTheCoolCat
      There's another video like this one, I already commented my opinion there.. but okay I'll repeat it, I think that men who throw a temper tantrum over this are too sensitive, if you are subbed to something and they upload a video about a topic you're not interested in, then just don't click on it, keep scrolling.. that's what I do. Don't act as though that's the reason for so many dislikes.. because "it's not the content I want from natgeo!!1!"

    • @Moooonlit
      @Moooonlit 4 года назад +1

      I'm a woman who dislike this video.

    • @fabiana7157
      @fabiana7157 4 года назад +2

      @@Moooonlit
      Congrats, your dislike is just as pointless as everyone else's, but the majority of those dislikes are from men, and the reason becomes obvious by going through this comment section.

    • @Fandar
      @Fandar 4 года назад +2

      @@CasperTheCoolCat Yeah but the comments prove that males who watch National Geographic are sexist towards women.

  • @soderfraga
    @soderfraga 4 года назад +17

    Celebrating the biggest mistake of European history...

    • @bitchplease1114
      @bitchplease1114 4 года назад +3

      I.e. giving women equal rights, without equal obligations. Sorry, don't take it personally, please.

  • @thomasmaughan4798
    @thomasmaughan4798 4 года назад

    "Why Is it Still Necessary?" It isn't *necessary* and it isn't mandated by the Constitution. Anyone that wishes to run for public office (with few limitations) is free to do so.

  • @farble1670
    @farble1670 4 года назад +1

    I know producing this type of content is cheaper than nature docs but please, this isn't why we subbed. How about making a second channel for politics?

  • @Ali3nh3art
    @Ali3nh3art 4 года назад +27

    entitlement, playing the victim, unsubbed,

    • @Zack-
      @Zack- 4 года назад +5

      Same. Woke garbage

    • @jt2988
      @jt2988 4 года назад

      Same!!! This is all bs so sick of it

  • @VoyagerD
    @VoyagerD 4 года назад +1

    All of the trolls in these comments are too desperate for attention. When they get too desperate, it stops actually being funny and becomes borderline cringy.

  • @cenzecspecialforcesoperato307
    @cenzecspecialforcesoperato307 4 года назад +4

    We need strong women in politics cause strong minds instead of people like trump I will vote for a woman any day cause they are fair thank you FMR soldier

  • @mmatrainee
    @mmatrainee 4 года назад +7

    Where are the men for this story?

  • @jozefstyczynski9170
    @jozefstyczynski9170 4 года назад +2

    It’s stupid, then and now

  • @underyourbreath331
    @underyourbreath331 4 года назад +8

    This comment section is why we need more inclusion in representation.
    “PiCk tHe BeSt PeRsOn FoR tHe JoB” sorry, if you have a string of copy-paste Chads, some of those people were not best and didn’t deserve the job.

    • @lsilvaj
      @lsilvaj 4 года назад

      whining losers like you is why not everybody is fit for office.

  • @knittygirlone3391
    @knittygirlone3391 4 года назад +1

    Yes yes yes!!

  • @BreezyVanilla
    @BreezyVanilla 4 года назад +3

    unsubbed

  • @Roy_Godiksen
    @Roy_Godiksen 4 года назад +3

    I wish there were more focus on getting the Right person, in stead of focusing on gender and color. Hopeless.

  • @camor5254
    @camor5254 4 года назад +4

    The amount of misogynistic, sexist, and quite honestly hilariously idiotic, comments presented by threatened men under this video goes to show how much of an improvement we have yet to make. How boring and sad to live in such an outdated mindset

  • @srbrant5391
    @srbrant5391 4 года назад

    Here before the incels start loping into the comment section.

  • @UAPJedi
    @UAPJedi 4 года назад +3

    🙄

  • @TMacGamer
    @TMacGamer 4 года назад

    No one cares what a persons gender is, their race or their orientation....
    What matters is, are you qualified for the job and are your the best person for it.
    That’s it. It’s 2021... stop acting as if there is still an issue.
    I’ve worked with and for people of all races and genders. NONE OF IT MATTERED.
    If you’re putting a person in a position because of their gender or race YOU ARE WRONG.
    That is exactly what MLK DIDNT want. It’s about the content of the character and their qualifications. We have come a long way in this country. Stop with the woke nonsense.
    It’s “what the streets are crying for”? HaHaHa.... WoW!
    Why is this even on National Geographic Channel? Looks like Nat Geo has jumped on the left wing propaganda bandwagon... pathetic

  • @sindromedeclown
    @sindromedeclown 4 года назад +1

    DISLIKE THIS VICTIMISM

  • @nicollebutt5124
    @nicollebutt5124 4 года назад

    Hwhwhshehhhehehe

  • @citizendildo5122
    @citizendildo5122 4 года назад +1

    My previous joke/comment got deleted. Surprise surprise.

  • @Billy-on9zc
    @Billy-on9zc 4 года назад

    First

  • @jefferreira2728
    @jefferreira2728 4 года назад

    Yes