Muhammad was often presented with questions to test his claims of prophethood. According to Muslim sources, he failed some of these tests catastrophically.
What do you think of Muhammad's answers? Thank you to the awesome people who contribute via Super Thanks and my awesome Patreon supporters! www.patreon.com/islamcritiqued
@jwrobin21 Apostate prophet and CIRA International already did videos on that topic and I think Christian Prince already did and so did urdu freethinker
Yo IC I've been doing some research about Islamic Spain and the scholarship theirein and I came across your video about the myth of the Andalusian paradise which was so eye opening. I wanted to ask if you could make a video about the martyrs of Cordoba as I find their treatment by modern scholars and the Christian dhimmi leadership of their day reprehensible. They are portrayed as extremists while the ones who actually ordered their lives to be taken are eulogized and I find their situation analogous to Bishop Mari Emanuel in how he has been treated by the secualr media and some of his coreligionists and labeled an extremist. I really think this video topic is one that needs proper addressing because we are in our lifetimes seeing what the martyrs of Cordoba went through. Thanks so much for all your work and looking forward to whatever comes next. 👍
Muhammad biography today is the “clean” version since Hissam used the work of Ishaq and took out what he considered “obvious lies to hurt the image of the prophet”. Can you imagine how bad Muhammad biography actually was if what we have today is the nice version?!
Just hearing about his lifestyle makes my skin crawl. It’s hard to believe so many people truly venerate his theological ignorance and locker-room talk 🤢
Hissam says he took the absurd things that was “obviously lies to hurt the image of the prophet” in Ishaq biography of Muhammad, so this version is the clean and nice Muhammad, can you imagine how bad it was before?!
@@cerberus3721 Wow. I shudder to think. Muhammad is the sort of guy good parents warn their daughters about. Instead they happily hand them over to him and other dirty old men. Everything our society protected us from during childhood is infiltrating our adulthood and parenthood. God help us and future generations
The Muslim Man can perform mufaakhathah with a GIRL as YOUNG as a BABY in a CRIB. When asked they say..What's wrong with THAT..I wonder how DEPRAVED are ALL Muslim MEN in the al-Lah Sex Club for Men.
And the people of the time knew too, that’s why they say is the “fables of the ancient” and laugh at him asking more difficult questions to see if Allah would help him. For more than a decade he preached almost none converted until he used the sword.
@@cerberus3721used the the sword bc the ppl tried to kill him.. if i were to ask u, if the shopkeeper hit u with a stick u wouldnt fight back would u???
The words prophet and Muhammad fit together only as well as a woolly mammoth through the eye of a needle.🦣 But at least we have proof that the woolly mammoth existed.
For those not aware of what Muhammad 'prophetically answering' spiritual questions with what we now know to be myths: ==== Imagine if a man walked up to Muhammad and asked "How does heat work?" and Muhammad responded "It is like a fluid, and a gas, that flows between objects." We now know that theory of temperature, the caloric theory, to be false - temperature is (roughly speaking) based on the amount of energy/movement inside of the molecules that make up an object. It is not a fluid or gas that 'transfers' between objects. ==== Yet, Muhammad giving such an answer is what we'd expect from someone who is trying to sound supernaturally wise by quoting 'fancy sounding' contemporary theories and myths that untraveled people may not know of. However, we now know those things to be exactly that: contemporary theories and myths (said theories, like the idea of a 'blood clot' stage in fetal development, being false).
He gets angry because he knows he cannot fabricate true answers. "Gibril" (who is actually Khadijah's library) inspired him with convenient mythological stories.
Don’t think he had a library to research bc he should know this books are not scripture if he had, or was he dumb enough to not understand what he was reading? I think he heard this stories in his merchant days and this is the way he remembered those stories…
@@solascriptura1536 idk, maybe he remembered them and came back with the “answers”, Muhammad biography is full of weird things that make difficult to know what was true or not. They all say he was illiterate and he recounted the stories wrong so he was either only half literate that’s why he doesn’t understand things, or he was remembering them wrong bc it was some time since he heard, or he was, not just a liar but extremely dumb to be able to read but not understand thinking it was scripture while reciting wrong what he just read.
@@cerberus3721 He's lucky to have you on his side...kinda. He was not illiterate, most of the Apocryphal and Midrash material he quotes were not common back then. Only people like Khadijah, a mother superior, and high ranking clergy had access to them. He thought the extra-Biblical literature was scripture, thus he presented it as if it was.
@@solascriptura1536 oh no, I’m not on the side of Muhammad, don’t offend me like that lol, best case scenario Muhammad was a insane man but I personally go with satanic or “if evil was a person” to describe him. Just throwing ideas what what could be the reason behind these verses based on the Islamic narrative of illiteracy but he could be able to read we just don’t have source to show muslims.
Well I have to give Mo some credit. Sometimes "I don't know" is the brave and correct answer. The beginning of wisdom even. But definitely a bit disappointing coming from god's supposed greatest prophet. Oh well.
He was acting very oddly as a very young boy: "His [Muhammad's friend's] father said to me, "I am afraid that this child [Muhammad] has had a stroke, so take him back to his family before the result appears. ..... She [Muhammad's mother] asked me what happened and gave me no peace until I told her. *When she asked if I feared a demon had possessed him, I replied that I did.* " (Guillaume's translation of Ibn Ishaq, page 72)
@@el_killorcureSee Nietzsche was a goo guy. He was defamed into an anti-semite person by his enemies. Yes, he did became mentally ill, then his own sister worked against him. And people forget one thing when calling Nietzsche a nihilist, which is that he was an existential nihilist, but a moral existentionalist. Now if you want to know more, please reply to my comment. I can't waste my time for a person who won't read this.
@@user-jw6yl1pi8z Dude, take a chill pill. I only said the Ubermench ended up talking to his horse due to syphilis, nothing more. He sure didn't start no death cult with him as warlord leader...
@el_killorcure I think you are being disingenuous because the story about Nietzsche and the horse is well known. It wasn't his own horse and he wasn't speaking to it. The real story is he witnessed a horse being beaten in the streets so he threw himself around the neck of the horse to prevent it being thrashed further. He lost his composure and then his consciousness. The man had a mental breakdown and never fully recovered.
I find the questions they asked interesting. They're really dumb questions. So, were the specific Jews in these instances just really that wrapped up in folklore and ignorance, were they mocking Muhammed by the nature of the questions, or are the Muslim sources trying to make the Jews look bad? Because, "recount two well-known folk tales and answer a generic question about God, and we will accept that as proof that you are a prophet," is just... silly.
It makes more "sense" if you take the authors (Ibn Ishaq or whomever) as simply composing a narrative to explain the occasion of revelation of Surah 18.
I think is mocking him, they told him “this is just the fables of the ancient” when he revealed this verses and asked basic theology questions about the nature of God after, to see Muhammad reaction. Jews put much importance in the stories but they knew they’re not scriptures but considered that wise man should know them. I think they wanted to see if he had minimum knowledge of some topics and if he was a prophet of God he would answer with amazing knowledge instead of this.
@IslamCritiqued , Right. Thanks for the correction 👍 So, I suppose the *Islamic authors* thought these were good and meaningful questions to put in the mouths of Jewish critics, as the "correct" supposed answering of them is understood as evidence of prophethood. So, the silliness of the questions finds its source in the esteemed Islamic authors and their foolish understanding of God and prophethood. Muhammed himself is also not safe, as the implicit or explicit point of many such "revelations" found in the Quran itself is to prove his prophetic bona fides, which just displays his own absurd standard which he attributes, insultingly as always, to God. The real, on the ground, Jews of the time must have actually asked him some pointed questions to test him at some point. I wonder what that *actually* looked like. It's clear they rejected him en masse and that this garnered his wrath against them, but I'd love to have been a fly on that wall to have heard their questions and his completely inadequate answers.
I’ve seen a couple of RUclips videos claiming that the first two questions refer to the Book of Daniel, Chapters 3 and 8 respectively. I’m not wholly convinced although I doubt the Jewish elders were looking for pagan and Christian myths.
The question on the spirit is more than just basic theology. It was a trap. Because the spirit is supposed to be Jibreel. So it was THE one question whose answer should have been easy if jibreel was real. Should jibreel not have been able to explain his own self and nature? 😂 😂 😂
Macbeth did exist, just not the version in Shakespeare. Arthur possibly existed. He would have lived around the same time as Muhammad, but the whole Arthurian mythology is bs. Arthur would have been a Britannic Celtic warlord against the Anglo Saxons. There is Welsh poetry mentioning someone as being “no Arthur”, suggesting stories about him existed and he was the benchmark for heroism for the Britannic Celts. I think the poem dates to the 7th century A.D. Robin Hood probably has no basis in history.
@@Apollo1989V Great legends built around real men, just like Mohammad - a title meaning the Blessed or Praised One until the Abbasids made up the Islamic prophet fable - referred to Jesus, and was used by powerful leaders i.e. Abd al-Malik put the title on his coins, Iyas ibn Qabisa who was an Arab warlord was also called Mohammad, as well as a leader of the Arab Tayyayye tribe. The title was morphed to become a specific Islamic prophet mid to late 8th century.
Depends on who you ask. But whether it's weak or not, it's a testimony to the same sentiment that places importance on the sexual strength of men. The fact that hadith like that exist at all is telling, regardless of their transmission. And remember, hadith like this are often graded selectively (based on their content).
Iman’s say Daif can have between 40-80% chance of being correct, don’t they? That’s why they still use and transmit this hadith to study until this day…
Again, it depends on what you're doing with the hadith. The hadith is, as I said, a testimony to the common Islamic sentiment that places importance on the sexual strength of men.
@@mysotiras21 so Jews were asking about trinity ? What is exactly Holy spirit? Is the holy spirit (HS)what keeps donkeys alive and kicking ? what about a lion eating a donkey can see HS killing himself ?😁
Do you deny Biblical scholarship? I mean the elephant in the room of a Christian apologetic trying to embezzle Biblical erros (editorial fatigue, Synoptic Problem, obvious Babylonian material enuma elish, Evangelists botching OT prophecies and many more)…?
jesus in bible in 1st century ' I tel you gathered here today this generation shall not pass until it sees kingdom of god come from the clouds ' 2k yrs and counting false prophecy=false prophet never mind being a false god vs Muhammad ' the time of the Hour is with the creator only. the one god ' muslim 2002 now then I gotta ask how are you still led astray ?
They wont think, or rather not think critically about their own belief. Doubting islam and muhammad is one of the biggest sins in islam, theyre basically too scared to think.
What do you think of Muhammad's answers?
Thank you to the awesome people who contribute via Super Thanks and my awesome Patreon supporters! www.patreon.com/islamcritiqued
When is anyone going to do a video on THE PROPHECIES OF MUHAMMAD?
@jwrobin21 Apostate prophet and CIRA International already did videos on that topic and I think Christian Prince already did and so did urdu freethinker
Yo IC I've been doing some research about Islamic Spain and the scholarship theirein and I came across your video about the myth of the Andalusian paradise which was so eye opening. I wanted to ask if you could make a video about the martyrs of Cordoba as I find their treatment by modern scholars and the Christian dhimmi leadership of their day reprehensible. They are portrayed as extremists while the ones who actually ordered their lives to be taken are eulogized and I find their situation analogous to Bishop Mari Emanuel in how he has been treated by the secualr media and some of his coreligionists and labeled an extremist. I really think this video topic is one that needs proper addressing because we are in our lifetimes seeing what the martyrs of Cordoba went through. Thanks so much for all your work and looking forward to whatever comes next. 👍
@@Musathekafir
Can you show me some links?
@@jwrobin21So you can ignore them?
Muhammad had every opportunity to give people profound knowledge, but each time he completely disappoints
He’s a false prophet.
Muhammad biography today is the “clean” version since Hissam used the work of Ishaq and took out what he considered “obvious lies to hurt the image of the prophet”. Can you imagine how bad Muhammad biography actually was if what we have today is the nice version?!
Robert Spencer saw what Hissam and said let me uncensor that
Just hearing about his lifestyle makes my skin crawl. It’s hard to believe so many people truly venerate his theological ignorance and locker-room talk 🤢
Hissam says he took the absurd things that was “obviously lies to hurt the image of the prophet” in Ishaq biography of Muhammad, so this version is the clean and nice Muhammad, can you imagine how bad it was before?!
@@cerberus3721 Wow. I shudder to think. Muhammad is the sort of guy good parents warn their daughters about. Instead they happily hand them over to him and other dirty old men. Everything our society protected us from during childhood is infiltrating our adulthood and parenthood. God help us and future generations
9 is not adult
A girl of 6
Is not legit
Should be easy to remember
The Muslim Man can perform mufaakhathah with a GIRL as YOUNG as a BABY in a CRIB. When asked they say..What's wrong with THAT..I wonder how DEPRAVED are ALL Muslim MEN in the al-Lah Sex Club for Men.
I prefer Without Lies and Excuses islaaam Always Loses!
Knocked it out of the park.
The Seven Sleepers and The Romance of Alexander were two of many pre-islamic fictional stories that the writer of the Quran copied from.
And the people of the time knew too, that’s why they say is the “fables of the ancient” and laugh at him asking more difficult questions to see if Allah would help him. For more than a decade he preached almost none converted until he used the sword.
@@cerberus3721Yes. They knew because those were the same fairytales they read to their children at bedtime.
crazy how u dedicated an whole account to our PROPHET PBUH. shows how he lives rent free in ur heads😂😂
@@cerberus3721used the the sword bc the ppl tried to kill him.. if i were to ask u, if the shopkeeper hit u with a stick u wouldnt fight back would u???
but they aren’t a part of Judaism and I doubt that they could be the test questions for prophethood :)
The words prophet and Muhammad fit together only as well as a woolly mammoth through the eye of a needle.🦣 But at least we have proof that the woolly mammoth existed.
For those not aware of what Muhammad 'prophetically answering' spiritual questions with what we now know to be myths:
====
Imagine if a man walked up to Muhammad and asked "How does heat work?" and Muhammad responded "It is like a fluid, and a gas, that flows between objects."
We now know that theory of temperature, the caloric theory, to be false - temperature is (roughly speaking) based on the amount of energy/movement inside of the molecules that make up an object. It is not a fluid or gas that 'transfers' between objects.
====
Yet, Muhammad giving such an answer is what we'd expect from someone who is trying to sound supernaturally wise by quoting 'fancy sounding' contemporary theories and myths that untraveled people may not know of. However, we now know those things to be exactly that: contemporary theories and myths (said theories, like the idea of a 'blood clot' stage in fetal development, being false).
Without lies, Islam dies!
ISLAM ... Ideology Seriously Lacks Anger Management ... indeed
He gets angry because he knows he cannot fabricate true answers. "Gibril" (who is actually Khadijah's library) inspired him with convenient mythological stories.
Don’t think he had a library to research bc he should know this books are not scripture if he had, or was he dumb enough to not understand what he was reading? I think he heard this stories in his merchant days and this is the way he remembered those stories…
@@cerberus3721 If he already HEARD the stories, why wait so long to share his REVELATION?
@@solascriptura1536 idk, maybe he remembered them and came back with the “answers”, Muhammad biography is full of weird things that make difficult to know what was true or not.
They all say he was illiterate and he recounted the stories wrong so he was either only half literate that’s why he doesn’t understand things, or he was remembering them wrong bc it was some time since he heard, or he was, not just a liar but extremely dumb to be able to read but not understand thinking it was scripture while reciting wrong what he just read.
@@cerberus3721 He's lucky to have you on his side...kinda. He was not illiterate, most of the Apocryphal and Midrash material he quotes were not common back then. Only people like Khadijah, a mother superior, and high ranking clergy had access to them. He thought the extra-Biblical literature was scripture, thus he presented it as if it was.
@@solascriptura1536 oh no, I’m not on the side of Muhammad, don’t offend me like that lol, best case scenario Muhammad was a insane man but I personally go with satanic or “if evil was a person” to describe him.
Just throwing ideas what what could be the reason behind these verses based on the Islamic narrative of illiteracy but he could be able to read we just don’t have source to show muslims.
Love your show; I always learn something. cheers
It must be from allah for even letters to Playboy magazine could not reproduce a work like it!
MUhamMAD is the most hole-y of all prophets.
it's funny because Seven Sleepers totally refutes islam
Surah 33:53 is the best as Muhammad threw Allah under the bus to get rid of his guest.
Well I have to give Mo some credit. Sometimes "I don't know" is the brave and correct answer. The beginning of wisdom even. But definitely a bit disappointing coming from god's supposed greatest prophet. Oh well.
Hey bro, look up some ancient drawings of Muhammad. You'll notice that he was a super sayan xD
God bless you!
That’s so funny he told an Alexander the Great tale
@r.nunezz By the way, Alexander was Bi Sexual person How can he be prophet of God? Oh so is Mhmd!
It seems like Muhamad had the spiritual ignorance and physical potency of Hugh Hefner.
Jews ask a question. The answer must be Christian legends and fables.
I still believe he suffered advanced stages of Neurosyphilis
Like Nietszche, who ended up talking to his horse?
Maybe Momo ended up talking to his camel as well, mistaking ot for Jibril...
He was acting very oddly as a very young boy:
"His [Muhammad's friend's] father said to me, "I am afraid that this child [Muhammad] has had a stroke, so take him back to his family before the result appears. ..... She [Muhammad's mother] asked me what happened and gave me no peace until I told her. *When she asked if I feared a demon had possessed him, I replied that I did.* "
(Guillaume's translation of Ibn Ishaq, page 72)
@@el_killorcureSee Nietzsche was a goo guy. He was defamed into an anti-semite person by his enemies. Yes, he did became mentally ill, then his own sister worked against him.
And people forget one thing when calling Nietzsche a nihilist, which is that he was an existential nihilist, but a moral existentionalist. Now if you want to know more, please reply to my comment. I can't waste my time for a person who won't read this.
@@user-jw6yl1pi8z Dude, take a chill pill.
I only said the Ubermench ended up talking to his horse due to syphilis, nothing more.
He sure didn't start no death cult with him as warlord leader...
@el_killorcure I think you are being disingenuous because the story about Nietzsche and the horse is well known. It wasn't his own horse and he wasn't speaking to it. The real story is he witnessed a horse being beaten in the streets so he threw himself around the neck of the horse to prevent it being thrashed further. He lost his composure and then his consciousness. The man had a mental breakdown and never fully recovered.
❤
Merci!
More Hammered.
First comment!!!
Gabriel didn't come after one day, because Ibn Ishaq says, "Seyed (i.e Muhammad) didn't say Inshallah" 😅
Stories like these are the reason why I am convinced Mohammed was a real person. No one would make up these stories about their prophet.
Allah couldn't protect his "prophet" from bewitching
does the third question with the i dont know answer has an associated verse in Quran as there were for the other two?
The best of all prophets who needs to go through an interpreter to speak with his god. Must be a very important VIP member.
We found not "Though shall not kill" in quran
I find the questions they asked interesting. They're really dumb questions. So, were the specific Jews in these instances just really that wrapped up in folklore and ignorance, were they mocking Muhammed by the nature of the questions, or are the Muslim sources trying to make the Jews look bad?
Because, "recount two well-known folk tales and answer a generic question about God, and we will accept that as proof that you are a prophet," is just... silly.
It makes more "sense" if you take the authors (Ibn Ishaq or whomever) as simply composing a narrative to explain the occasion of revelation of Surah 18.
I think is mocking him, they told him “this is just the fables of the ancient” when he revealed this verses and asked basic theology questions about the nature of God after, to see Muhammad reaction. Jews put much importance in the stories but they knew they’re not scriptures but considered that wise man should know them.
I think they wanted to see if he had minimum knowledge of some topics and if he was a prophet of God he would answer with amazing knowledge instead of this.
@IslamCritiqued ,
Right. Thanks for the correction 👍
So, I suppose the *Islamic authors* thought these were good and meaningful questions to put in the mouths of Jewish critics, as the "correct" supposed answering of them is understood as evidence of prophethood. So, the silliness of the questions finds its source in the esteemed Islamic authors and their foolish understanding of God and prophethood. Muhammed himself is also not safe, as the implicit or explicit point of many such "revelations" found in the Quran itself is to prove his prophetic bona fides, which just displays his own absurd standard which he attributes, insultingly as always, to God.
The real, on the ground, Jews of the time must have actually asked him some pointed questions to test him at some point. I wonder what that *actually* looked like. It's clear they rejected him en masse and that this garnered his wrath against them, but I'd love to have been a fly on that wall to have heard their questions and his completely inadequate answers.
A siily challenge, perhaps, but Momo's answers were much sillier.
I’ve seen a couple of RUclips videos claiming that the first two questions refer to the Book of Daniel, Chapters 3 and 8 respectively. I’m not wholly convinced although I doubt the Jewish elders were looking for pagan and Christian myths.
Kindly regaurds From Afghanistan.
Mohammed was unalphabit and his 1st ladies were bech(chapter Ahzab 28-30)
I’d blush if this guy walked into the room…good thing it’d be hidden under my hijab!!! 😉🥰
Question: are these from Islamic sources?
….yes!
Playboy prophet. 😂😂😂😂
The question on the spirit is more than just basic theology. It was a trap. Because the spirit is supposed to be Jibreel. So it was THE one question whose answer should have been easy if jibreel was real.
Should jibreel not have been able to explain his own self and nature?
😂 😂 😂
Nice!
Masha'Allah ❤
SMASH Allah, the FAKE god of the FAKE prophet Muhammad.
why is islam so funny?
I know it’s sad and all that lots of people believe this crap actually happened and maybe some of it did but that doesn’t make it any less hilarious.
Anger management issues, ignorance and doesn't like people asking questions. Yeah that's ol' Muhis.
It's almost as easy to bewitch Muhammad as it was for the apostle Paul to corrupt Allah's words!
Someone should run the Q☪️’rn through plagiarism detection software … I’m betting the results would be quite interesting.
I believe Mohammad existed just like Robin Hood, Macbeth and King Arthur did.
We have more historical evidence for Arthur and Robin Hood than we have for Muhammad.
@@mysotiras21 🤣 yup
Macbeth did exist, just not the version in Shakespeare. Arthur possibly existed. He would have lived around the same time as Muhammad, but the whole Arthurian mythology is bs. Arthur would have been a Britannic Celtic warlord against the Anglo Saxons. There is Welsh poetry mentioning someone as being “no Arthur”, suggesting stories about him existed and he was the benchmark for heroism for the Britannic Celts. I think the poem dates to the 7th century A.D. Robin Hood probably has no basis in history.
@@Apollo1989V Great legends built around real men, just like Mohammad - a title meaning the Blessed or Praised One until the Abbasids made up the Islamic prophet fable - referred to Jesus, and was used by powerful leaders i.e. Abd al-Malik put the title on his coins, Iyas ibn Qabisa who was an Arab warlord was also called Mohammad, as well as a leader of the Arab Tayyayye tribe. The title was morphed to become a specific Islamic prophet mid to late 8th century.
Imbotent
Sunan Ibn Majah 4337 is Daif( weak in transmission) we cant use that verse.
Depends on who you ask. But whether it's weak or not, it's a testimony to the same sentiment that places importance on the sexual strength of men. The fact that hadith like that exist at all is telling, regardless of their transmission. And remember, hadith like this are often graded selectively (based on their content).
Iman’s say Daif can have between 40-80% chance of being correct, don’t they? That’s why they still use and transmit this hadith to study until this day…
@@cerberus3721 to be on the safe side we should only use Sahih and Hasan verses that way we have a strong case.
Again, it depends on what you're doing with the hadith. The hadith is, as I said, a testimony to the common Islamic sentiment that places importance on the sexual strength of men.
YES, YOU CAN. According to Islamic scholars, daif ahadith have a 45-85% chance of being true.
Ok since you know what is the spirit?
The One makes us alive what is it ?
Not "what" but "Who"? The Holy Spirit is Almighty God.
@@mysotiras21
so Jews were asking about trinity ?
What is exactly Holy spirit?
Is the holy spirit (HS)what keeps donkeys alive and kicking ?
what about a lion eating a donkey can see HS killing himself ?😁
Do you deny Biblical scholarship? I mean the elephant in the room of a Christian apologetic trying to embezzle Biblical erros (editorial fatigue, Synoptic Problem, obvious Babylonian material enuma elish, Evangelists botching OT prophecies and many more)…?
"Hey look over there!"
@@IslamCritiqued Welp, Xtians.
You are liar the answer of question 3 is
Quran 17:85
jesus in bible in 1st century ' I tel you gathered here today this generation shall not pass until it sees kingdom of god come from the clouds ' 2k yrs and counting false prophecy=false prophet never mind being a false god vs Muhammad ' the time of the Hour is with the creator only. the one god ' muslim 2002 now then I gotta ask how are you still led astray ?
This is becoming big business. I hope people are not paying for this. Think ppl think. This is a business now
Islam has ALWAYS been a business. It grew because early Muslim leaders promised converts lots of war booty.
Explain yourself. Why is this business or big bisiness?
They wont think, or rather not think critically about their own belief. Doubting islam and muhammad is one of the biggest sins in islam, theyre basically too scared to think.
Big business is Oil Sheiks funding mosks, madrassa’s and Dawah academies all over the world. I wonder how many employees in all.