@@rub1516 a federer lo tuvo 5 a 0 en sus primeros 5 partidos. A Nadal 2-0 y casi 3-0 porque rafa tuvo que salvar 5 match points en indian wells. Nalbandian era un crack pero para ser como el big 3 se necesitan muchas cosas mas. Pero igual David tenía para ganar mucho mas de lo que gano.
@@cocolatin1 david era un boludo.. una mentalidad de tirar los partidos muy facil y muy rapido, igual que gaudio ( aunque gaudio era peor ) todos los tenistas argentinos son asi.. nadie dice que no era crack nalbandian , jugaba muy bien pero para pelear con estos tipos como djokovic nadal y federer necesitas la mentalidad de ellos.
@@juliannfloress3490 Del Potro no fue así, era muy sólido mentalmente. Si no se hubiera lesionado tantas veces podría haber tenido 5 grand slams tranquilamente
Imagine if Nalbandian could move at this stage of his career (no need to answer about whos fault this is), but his was so so good from the baseline he could almost keep up with Rafa and even make him run all over the court like few players can
Well, Ferrer and Federer stayed he could have been number one had he cared. This despite a fraction of the work ethic. Moreover, he had the softest shot on tour. In the words of Nadal, ‘A great talent.’
The problem was he had a mental block against Djokovic in 2011 even on clay which caused him to go forehand to Djokovic's backhand way to much which became too predictable and it cost him a 3rd wimbledon and another US Open
@@patcisz3474Wouldn’t say he had a mental block Djokovic was just playing Better than him simple as. He couldn’t have had mental block on the clay, he only lost to Djokovic twice before that in 2011
@@CesarRodriguez-zh7zj ese golpe y otros le sirvió para ser 3 del mundo, ganar grandes torneos y ganarles a los mejores ( tambien es admirado y muy respetado por los mejores jugadores ejemplos como federer y nadal ) calidad en cantidad . Abrazo
Nalbandian hizo una gran carrera pero que queda corta para la calidad que atesoraba en su raqueta. Quiza unos 7 u 8 gs y el numero 1 habria sido más acorde a su juego. Mental y físicamente no iba acercarse nunca al big 3 para ganar tanto como ellos.
es imposible que algun tenista sume 7, 8 grand slams teniendo que jugar contra djokovic federer o nadal, incluso ni murray ni wawrinka pudieron hacerlo a murray le alcanzó con 1 y wawrinka tiene 3.. podes ser muy bueno, pero para ganar esa cantidad de torneos necesitas ser mucho mas .
@@juliannfloress3490 del potro pudo pero se rompio muchos años. fijate que su carrera es 2008-10 2011-13 y 2016-19. ninguno de sus contemporaneos se interrumpio tantas veces
Nadal: "2011 my problem was Djokovic,I was winning against everyone and losing for him in the finals,now he continue to be my problem because I cannot win against him on hard courts since 2013,and I swear of god if I lose again for him in AO,it's killing me and my fans" 😂
I love watching matches like these that most people have forgotten about
Nobody cares
@@atomics.h.1824 lol piss off
@@atomics.h.1824I care
Same here ✌️
David lo movió de punta a punta pero este tipo siempre devuelve una más y en los puntos claves es el mejor.
David sabia como jugarle a nadal y federer pero mentalmente en los puntos decisivos ellos eran mejores.
@@cocolatin1 sí igual acá lo agarró pisando el retiro.
Se nota que no se pudo recuperar de las operaciones.
@@rub1516 a federer lo tuvo 5 a 0 en sus primeros 5 partidos. A Nadal 2-0 y casi 3-0 porque rafa tuvo que salvar 5 match points en indian wells. Nalbandian era un crack pero para ser como el big 3 se necesitan muchas cosas mas. Pero igual David tenía para ganar mucho mas de lo que gano.
@@cocolatin1 david era un boludo.. una mentalidad de tirar los partidos muy facil y muy rapido, igual que gaudio ( aunque gaudio era peor ) todos los tenistas argentinos son asi.. nadie dice que no era crack nalbandian , jugaba muy bien pero para pelear con estos tipos como djokovic nadal y federer necesitas la mentalidad de ellos.
@@juliannfloress3490 Del Potro no fue así, era muy sólido mentalmente. Si no se hubiera lesionado tantas veces podría haber tenido 5 grand slams tranquilamente
Imagine if Nalbandian could move at this stage of his career (no need to answer about whos fault this is), but his was so so good from the baseline he could almost keep up with Rafa and even make him run all over the court like few players can
Nadal’s 2011 US Open had lots of Huge servering opponents , Mahut - Nalbandian - Muller - Roddick - Murray and then Djokovic.
Mahut, Muller and Roddick yes the others I wouldn't classify as big servers.
@@cfhar080591 yeah not by a long shot lol
In which world Nalbandian and Murray have big serves?
Even Djokovic didn't had that big of a serving game back then!
Nalbandian didnt have a big serve
Nalbandian was so talented
Nobody cares
@@atomics.h.1824 You care though!
He beat Big 3 while being fat and injured, the highest peak
Nalbandian was more talented than anyone. He just had other interests, which his rivals were well aware of.
Well, Ferrer and Federer stayed he could have been number one had he cared. This despite a fraction of the work ethic. Moreover, he had the softest shot on tour. In the words of Nadal, ‘A great talent.’
Facts
Once Nadal started with the forehands down the line, this match got so much easier for him
The problem was he had a mental block against Djokovic in 2011 even on clay which caused him to go forehand to Djokovic's backhand way to much which became too predictable and it cost him a 3rd wimbledon and another US Open
@@patcisz3474Wouldn’t say he had a mental block Djokovic was just playing Better than him simple as. He couldn’t have had mental block on the clay, he only lost to Djokovic twice before that in 2011
@@patcisz3474no mental block, djokovic outclassed him
@@NamTran-xc2ip Nadal lost both matches to him in Madrid and Rome in straight sets. That is a clear mental block
This version of Nalbandian would still destroy all the next gens
Dules, you clearly have a grudge.
@@hutsonolsen9529its what the fedcopers like to believe, let them be 😂
Omg I like their hugging 🥺
The last double fault was sad though. Awesome game !!
nice highlights. could you please upload djokovic davydenko from this tournament?
Thanks for uploading
Nalbandian is one of few players who's backhand is better than forehand..
though this match was a straight set victory for Rafa but Nalbandian had the ability to toy with him.
Y sigue siendo el mismo 9 años despue's 😎
Vaya maravilla de revés de Nalbandian
JGA Y de que le sirvio ??
@@CesarRodriguez-zh7zj ese golpe y otros le sirvió para ser 3 del mundo, ganar grandes torneos y ganarles a los mejores ( tambien es admirado y muy respetado por los mejores jugadores ejemplos como federer y nadal ) calidad en cantidad . Abrazo
@@CesarRodriguez-zh7zj El de arriba te cerro la boca dowm
@@CesarRodriguez-zh7zj que boludo
@@CesarRodriguez-zh7zj mira madrid del 2013 y vas a ver de que le sirvió, le ganó a Federer, Nadal y Djokovic en el mismo torneo
Nalbandian hizo una gran carrera pero que queda corta para la calidad que atesoraba en su raqueta. Quiza unos 7 u 8 gs y el numero 1 habria sido más acorde a su juego. Mental y físicamente no iba acercarse nunca al big 3 para ganar tanto como ellos.
es imposible que algun tenista sume 7, 8 grand slams teniendo que jugar contra djokovic federer o nadal, incluso ni murray ni wawrinka pudieron hacerlo a murray le alcanzó con 1 y wawrinka tiene 3.. podes ser muy bueno, pero para ganar esa cantidad de torneos necesitas ser mucho mas .
murray tambien 3 grandes
@@juliannfloress3490 del potro pudo pero se rompio muchos años. fijate que su carrera es 2008-10 2011-13 y 2016-19. ninguno de sus contemporaneos se interrumpio tantas veces
Vamos Rafa!
El mejor Nalbandian!!
Now, Nalbandian never won a single Major but his technique was better than Rafas
cuando Rafa tenía pelo...
Roger Federer. 👿
Nadal: "2011 my problem was Djokovic,I was winning against everyone and losing for him in the finals,now he continue to be my problem because I cannot win against him on hard courts since 2013,and I swear of god if I lose again for him in AO,it's killing me and my fans" 😂
why they always ask rafa to win against roger/novak on hc/grass grand slams but never ask them to win roland garros by beating rafa.
@@strongwise1255 Ummm yes they do. Roger's French Open title always had criticism because he couldn't beat Rafa.
22 GRAND SLAMS.
Rafa is djokobitch's daddy, vamos rafa
The daddy won the final against his bitch. Djokovic fucked Rafa in final.
😂😂
Nalbandian > Nadal HC peak wise
🤣
Thomas brunkle Nalbandian > peak Federer HC
Nalbandian is the greatest waste of talent i have ever seen in sport
The guy is so good its amazing
Nadal>>>>>Nalbandian
HC grand slam count wise.
5>0
@@WuzzaWombat How smarter you needed to be to say that?
실수하는데 웃어?