Summary (I'm leaving this here as a personal note): 1. Based on her theoretical and empirical research, in many but not all instances, people have found ways to agree on rules that helped them escape the tragedy of the commons. 2. Intervention has to be complex, and occur at both the government and market levels. The tragedy of the commons is a complex problem which requires a complex solution. 3. Since global warming has effects on many small local communities and not just on a global scale, interventions can be made to tackle these, which will produce global externalities (this is called the 'polycentric approach').
Sure thing. Oops! It looks like you forgot to write a paper on your topic and provide the proof of your claim. Oh well, back to the drawing board with you. See you in a few years...
I'm not the one who makes up the rules that determine how Nobel Prizes are chosen. Go complain to them about "technicality." If you can't find anyone to publish you paper, then your paper isn't worth anything, let alone a Nobel Prize. You may want to ask your friends if they think you are suffering from delusions of grandeur.
You are silencing yourself by making claims without offering any proof, and instead, offering lame excuses for not doing so. Also, stop going off topic, that's another problem you have.
It's not my fault you don't prescribe to the scientific method, which requires evidence to support your discovered hypothesis, whatever the hell that is, since all you have presented is an incoherent claim. Why so defensive? Why the deflection to an accusatory tone? Face it, you don't have any proof. Stop wasting my time.
and sadly she also forgot that people cooperating and working together on solutions is literally what a government does. She's just giving it another name.
@@silverhawkscape2677 are they really now? Do tell, whose electing the people in charge of governments? Who is it that delegate their power and decision making abilities to the government?
I'm trying to find the research docs she talks about at the end, how do you pronounce the person she is referring to? Esther Magni? Esther Maughny? Google isn't autocorrecting it for me aha
Why don't you just read the work she's written... PS Don't you see the irony of the dichotomy you make between "government regulation" and "people themselves?" As if these are somehow different. That is very telling. And fascinating I might add.
because she proved that tragedy of the commons that is regarded by the cult of economics is bunch of theoretical BS that does not happen in real life...
Summary (I'm leaving this here as a personal note):
1. Based on her theoretical and empirical research, in many but not all instances, people have found ways to agree on rules that helped them escape the tragedy of the commons.
2. Intervention has to be complex, and occur at both the government and market levels. The tragedy of the commons is a complex problem which requires a complex solution.
3. Since global warming has effects on many small local communities and not just on a global scale, interventions can be made to tackle these, which will produce global externalities (this is called the 'polycentric approach').
Poor lady died a few months later.
Sure thing. Oops! It looks like you forgot to write a paper on your topic and provide the proof of your claim. Oh well, back to the drawing board with you. See you in a few years...
I'm not the one who makes up the rules that determine how Nobel Prizes are chosen. Go complain to them about "technicality."
If you can't find anyone to publish you paper, then your paper isn't worth anything, let alone a Nobel Prize.
You may want to ask your friends if they think you are suffering from delusions of grandeur.
You are silencing yourself by making claims without offering any proof, and instead, offering lame excuses for not doing so. Also, stop going off topic, that's another problem you have.
It's not my fault you don't prescribe to the scientific method, which requires evidence to support your discovered hypothesis, whatever the hell that is, since all you have presented is an incoherent claim.
Why so defensive? Why the deflection to an accusatory tone? Face it, you don't have any proof. Stop wasting my time.
You have nothing, and you get nothing. Bye!
How in the world do I get an Exxon Mobil advertisement immediately before this Elinor Ostrom video 😂
Why are the comments for this video so twisted? Those who are posting inappropriate, negative comments need serious help...
Bottom line, it’s a “problem” that conveniently forgets that people can cooperate and work together for their common good.
and sadly she also forgot that people cooperating and working together on solutions is literally what a government does. She's just giving it another name.
@@Google_Censored_Commenter Government causes more problems anyways. Communities are different feom Governments.
@@silverhawkscape2677 are they really now? Do tell, whose electing the people in charge of governments? Who is it that delegate their power and decision making abilities to the government?
Wonderful.
Great contribution.
I'm trying to find the research docs she talks about at the end, how do you pronounce the person she is referring to? Esther Magni? Esther Maughny? Google isn't autocorrecting it for me aha
dw think I found it, if anyone else is curious its Esther Mwangi
Esther Mwangi - www.cifor.org/scientific-staff-detail/2862/esther-mwangi
Thank you very much, I was starting the same research but I decided to scroll a little bit more before... :D
1:03 "top down government or free market"
... Those things are mutually exclusive. Diametrically opposed.
If we had MORE women contributing to economics, we more than likely would NOT be at the brink of a global ecological disaster!
She’s not a woman. She’s a turtle
Retarded
My county disabled me and threw me to the wolves.
i think its part of a the problem that they cant communicate. if they can they would make some rules so its better for everyone
Could someone give me more examples were the Tragedy of the Commons is solved by people themselves and not through government regulation?
For example the establishment of the government itself!
Why don't you just read the work she's written...
PS Don't you see the irony of the dichotomy you make between "government regulation" and "people themselves?" As if these are somehow different. That is very telling. And fascinating I might add.
Co-ops and legitimate non-profit organizations.
U will never care about a stranger or his possessions more then you and your own
ruclips.net/video/vT99LqJaTeI/видео.html
Good
Uh huh. Right. If government did it right.
comrade stalin where are you
I can't believe how anyone with a brain can take the tragedy of the commons seriously.
Open fishing, poaching, Buffalo almost going extinct, lots of examples why
I ended up reading the transcript so i didnt have to listen to her
I'm certainly glad I don't have to listen to you. Once I block you, I won't have to see your juvenile, trollish comments either.
i bet she only won because she bored off all the other candidates and won by default
why did she win a nobel prize
because she proved that tragedy of the commons that is regarded by the cult of economics is bunch of theoretical BS that does not happen in real life...
this lady looks like my great grandma
I hope it gets taken down
my great grandma is dead
i flagged this video as infringing my personal rights