Oh, is it suddenly ok to talk about immigration now then?! How many of us have been given a rough ride by the media, calling us racists for doing so! 🤔
Another muslim only concerned with palestine israel problems rather than British problems, and threatening Labour too if not carried out on their behalf. 😒
The people who cross in boats do so because there is no legal way. They can't apply for asylum until they are physically in the country, and they aren't allowed to enter the country without a visa. If they tried to get on a plane train or ferry they would be prevented from boarding. No one would choose such a dangerous method if there was a better one open to them.
Also talk of stopping the 'people smuggling gangs' no mention of them stopping the actual boats. More border security ??? More border control boats to go out and pick them up then. That is what she means. Italy, Spain and France have had enough and will stop it, so why cant we?
@@joseflock If they come from France, return them to France. It is a place of safety but does not put them in hotels, they come here for the freebies and who can blame them when they are on offer for all to see.
The only way this will be resolved is to take away the benefit of crossing making less people want to cross, which will wipe out the incentive for people traffickers. Starmer and his minions are completely back to front in their approach and there will ALWAYS be traffickers while there is a demand. It's not rocket science, it takes strong action.
The action should be comprehensive: These poor people want or need to flee their country of residence, are trafficked galore on their way then may drown. Why not create a clear and unambigious awareness campaigns about living and working in the UK (EU)😑with the countries they are attempting to leave or even flee? Many refugees are blissfully unaware what awaits them or how long it takes. The process has to be clear even to the uneducated🕊️
@@marumaru6084 🙏On the contrary, all can be winners. If our leaders opt to give the Global South a greater role in the UN and/or NATO or other global strategic networks, the opportunity to align them around common principles, values and goals can only increase. We would have united mich quicker against Putin, terrorism, or horrific mass human rights sagas if we do this The good old "either or" way of thinking could be left behind in favour of new and third alternative solutions, that is IF the parties agree to this, for matters of professional, human rights progress and peace on earth. In this way, we leave no one behind, The security of human rights entitlement according to international law, the option of choice and skills match could then be offered to the poor, the refugees, as well as globally oriented skilled migration. By 2050 we face 2 billion climate refugees. Hope Labour can come up with a bi partisan plan which may also be of interest to the EU and/or the US. The West cannot continue to absorb all refugees
There is no objective sufficient contract, and no healthy relationship with France due to brexit. This is also due to the Conservative Party creating immigration as a scapegoat.
Immigration is often wrongly blamed for economic struggles, but the real issue is growing wealth inequality. This scapegoating diverts attention from complex economic problems. Unresolved wealth inequality fuels neofascist movements, which exploit economic frustrations and blame immigrants and minorities. Housing affordability issues are global, impacting cities like London, New York, and Tokyo. It's a systemic problem, not just local to the UK. Since the 2008 crisis, prices for housing, stocks, land, and precious metals have surged. The wealthiest 0.1% are gaining more wealth, pushing asset prices up and wages down. Central banks printing money since 2008 has inflated prices, making housing unaffordable while wages stagnate. The super-rich benefit, while ordinary families struggle to afford housing and build wealth, widening the economic gap. Wealthy kids get help to buy property, but ordinary families face more difficulty, reducing social mobility. To address wealth inequality, we need progressive taxation on the super-rich, policies to improve asset ownership for everyone, and closing tax loopholes. Increasing working-class representation in politics and media, and fostering unity among diverse groups. The Immigrants that do come here are relatively powerless, the true power is in our biased media (bought by foreign owners) and the asset owning class in the UK. I'm not talking about high income earners, like a £100k doctor. I'm talking about multi-millionaires who have so much money they just let it sit in accounts and earn money for them "money makes money". If you don't have money someone else does. Addressing wealth inequality is crucial to resolving economic struggles and preventing the rise of neofascist movements (Reform UK) and the Le Pen Fascists are key examples. By focusing on the true root causes, we can create improve the UK. Look at Gary's Economics for more: ruclips.net/user/GarysEconomics
Starmer is releasing 40k criminals from jails. Where is the concern for their eventual victims? Also, legal migration into the UK is a much larger problem than illegal migration.
No, this will open us up to fascism. You are throwing away your own human rights. They exist for a reason. Immigration is often wrongly blamed for economic struggles, but the real issue is growing wealth inequality. This scapegoating diverts attention from complex economic problems. Unresolved wealth inequality fuels neofascist movements, which exploit economic frustrations and blame immigrants and minorities. Housing affordability issues are global, impacting cities like London, New York, and Tokyo. It's a systemic problem, not just local to the UK. Since the 2008 crisis, prices for housing, stocks, land, and precious metals have surged. The wealthiest 0.1% are gaining more wealth, pushing asset prices up and wages down. Central banks printing money since 2008 has inflated prices, making housing unaffordable while wages stagnate. The super-rich benefit, while ordinary families struggle to afford housing and build wealth, widening the economic gap. Wealthy kids get help to buy property, but ordinary families face more difficulty, reducing social mobility. To address wealth inequality, we need progressive taxation on the super-rich, policies to improve asset ownership for everyone, and closing tax loopholes. Increasing working-class representation in politics and media, and fostering unity among diverse groups. The Immigrants that do come here are relatively powerless, the true power is in our biased media (bought by foreign owners) and the asset owning class in the UK. I'm not talking about high income earners, like a £100k doctor. I'm talking about multi-millionaires who have so much money they just let it sit in accounts and earn money for them "money makes money". If you don't have money someone else does. Addressing wealth inequality is crucial to resolving economic struggles and preventing the rise of neofascist movements (Reform UK) and the Le Pen Fascists are key examples. By focusing on the true root causes, we can create improve the UK. Look at Gary's Economics for more: ruclips.net/user/GarysEconomics
97% of immigrants are not coming in the small boats. You're complaining about the wrong things. Far more important to invest more in training British people so we don't need so many foreign workers.
@@Gill-pc9nm the increase in training was one of few things I agreed with them on. I hope Labour will do something along those lines, but because they promised not to raise any income tax it's going to be difficult to find any money for anything.
That's the fascist party, and they only care about themselves not you and your family. Immigration is often wrongly blamed for economic struggles, but the real issue is growing wealth inequality. This scapegoating diverts attention from complex economic problems. Unresolved wealth inequality fuels neofascist movements, which exploit economic frustrations and blame immigrants and minorities. Housing affordability issues are global, impacting cities like London, New York, and Tokyo. It's a systemic problem, not just local to the UK. Since the 2008 crisis, prices for housing, stocks, land, and precious metals have surged. The wealthiest 0.1% are gaining more wealth, pushing asset prices up and wages down. Central banks printing money since 2008 has inflated prices, making housing unaffordable while wages stagnate. The super-rich benefit, while ordinary families struggle to afford housing and build wealth, widening the economic gap. Wealthy kids get help to buy property, but ordinary families face more difficulty, reducing social mobility. To address wealth inequality, we need progressive taxation on the super-rich, policies to improve asset ownership for everyone, and closing tax loopholes. Increasing working-class representation in politics and media, and fostering unity among diverse groups. The Immigrants that do come here are relatively powerless, the true power is in our biased media (bought by foreign owners) and the asset owning class in the UK. I'm not talking about high income earners, like a £100k doctor. I'm talking about multi-millionaires who have so much money they just let it sit in accounts and earn money for them "money makes money". If you don't have money someone else does. Addressing wealth inequality is crucial to resolving economic struggles and preventing the rise of neofascist movements (Reform UK) and the Le Pen Fascists are key examples. By focusing on the true root causes, we can create improve the UK. Look at Gary's Economics for more: ruclips.net/user/GarysEconomics
@Blue_Angel1 A lot of liberal (fascist) left leaning twaddle there. If lefties hate the "super rich" so much then perhaps they need to stop shopping at places like B&M - owned by Billionaires / personal friends of David Cameron and Tory donors. Or better yet, stop getting their entire lives on finance and making bankers lots of money! But guess what.... they won't..😂
Maybe we could produce some sort of league table to show how many illegal immigrants have perished in the Channel under the watch of each recent Prime Minister? Seems like a reasonable way to measure failure to me...
The REAL British, those who remember their History, & understand we NEED people to fill so many jobs & pay tax, should be working to WORK TOGETHER to EDUCATE us all toward a better understanding...we need each-other, the 'right-wing' media has continually railed against 'foreigners'....WE CAN DO BETTER!
80 000 migrants who are at least 80% asylum seekers is not a problem. Have a processing centre in France, and let them come legally. Process their claims in a timely fashion. Problem solved.
@@annepoitrineau5650 yes. It's fair enough to complain about immigration because the overall numbers were incredible high last year, at over 1% of the population of the country (nearly 2% if you are talking how many new people arrived and don't deduct the number leaving). But the boat people are such a tiny proportion of that (3% of arrivals) that it's crazy to obsess over them and ignore the other 97%!
@@adrianthoroughgood1191 I agree about the 90 000 boats people. Still, there is the fact that, where students (the largest contigent) are concerned, they come and go. So let's say: 700 000 foreigners arrived year 1, including 350 000 students. The year after, 200 000 students or more will leave, another 300 000 will arrive, so in fact, you could say that it is 100 000+300 000 "others" year one, also year 2. But Reform and the Murdoch Press, as they present immigration in separate years, muddy the waters. Moreover, a lot of Continental Euroepans have left recently, and their jobs need to be filled.
@@annepoitrineau5650 the 700k is the net figure (arrive-leave). The arrive figure was over 1200k. A large proportion of students leave, but not all. Generally the number arriving and leaving each year is about the same, -those that stay, so normally including students is OK. But because of covid there were far fewer students for a couple of years. Now they are coming again but there are none now leaving at the end of their course so the numbers are temporarily inflated. Over the next few years the net figures would drop even if the government did nothing. Which is quite handy for Labour as they can claim credit for the drop.
Considering the number coming over 19 is very small number when compared to the number of people murdered on the streets. The channel is safer than the streets.
Which aspect of enforcement are they talking about? Is it the detection of illegal migrants, not difficult considering they bring themselves to notice. Is it the time taken to process asylum claims? That is an administrative issue not an enforcement issue. Is it the removal of failed asylum seekers? That can only be improved by allowing longer periods of detention while documentation issues are dealt with and judicial reviews are dealt with. Alternatively, judicial reviews should be considered from abroad and costs for 'vexatious' judicial review should be imposed on the activist lawyers. The idea of creating a new small boats command would be more impressive if it didn't already exist.
Actions will speak louder than words . As we have hear this all before from Boris Johnson and other before . We had a good chance to have put a block on it before we joined the EU . And at the time E Powell waned of what would happen every one no notice but he has been proved right and having the last laugh .
It should be obvious now that Labour will do nothing to stop the boats if it requires courage. They are afraid of the smallest amounts of friction. For them all intervention must be as smooth as a handshake. And they will tell the public every kind of lie, travesty and sophistry to try to justify their cowardice. Fortune favours the brave. But to the timid and hesitating all things are impossible simply because they seem so.
Immigration is often wrongly blamed for economic struggles, but the real issue is growing wealth inequality. This scapegoating diverts attention from complex economic problems. Unresolved wealth inequality fuels neofascist movements, which exploit economic frustrations and blame immigrants and minorities. Housing affordability issues are global, impacting cities like London, New York, and Tokyo. It's a systemic problem, not just local to the UK. Since the 2008 crisis, prices for housing, stocks, land, and precious metals have surged. The wealthiest 0.1% are gaining more wealth, pushing asset prices up and wages down. Central banks printing money since 2008 has inflated prices, making housing unaffordable while wages stagnate. The super-rich benefit, while ordinary families struggle to afford housing and build wealth, widening the economic gap. Wealthy kids get help to buy property, but ordinary families face more difficulty, reducing social mobility. To address wealth inequality, we need progressive taxation on the super-rich, policies to improve asset ownership for everyone, and closing tax loopholes. Increasing working-class representation in politics and media, and fostering unity among diverse groups. The Immigrants that do come here are relatively powerless, the true power is in our biased media (bought by foreign owners) and the asset owning class in the UK. I'm not talking about high income earners, like a £100k doctor. I'm talking about multi-millionaires who have so much money they just let it sit in accounts and earn money for them "money makes money". If you don't have money someone else does. Addressing wealth inequality is crucial to resolving economic struggles and preventing the rise of neofascist movements (Reform UK) and the Le Pen Fascists are key examples. By focusing on the true root causes, we can create improve the UK. Look at Gary's Economics for more: ruclips.net/user/GarysEconomics
@@Blue_Angel1 WRONG. No sensible person in the UK is scapegoating illegal migrants. I can remember when things were very different to how they are now. Numbers matter. You cannot overburden a nation's infrastructure and expect it to function efficiently. No, not even in a society where the distribution of wealth per capita is so even that it is 100% praiseworthy. There are reasons why people Can't get a doctor's appointment in time, Can't get an ambulance on time, Can't find an NHS dentist to treat them, Die while waiting long in the A&E queues at hospitals, Have to wait a very long time for a call to be answered whenever they phone The DWP or A bank or A council or The NHS. And there are reasons why we have an epidemic of homelessness. Even a child understands that a limited space cannot accommodate an unlimited number of people. Anyone who thinks that IF the 14,000 illegal migrants that arrived here on boats in the last 12 months had not come, that the UK would be worse off for them not being here is bonkers.
Starmer wants to rejoin the eu. Perhaps he can ask them why they dumped these foreigners in camps on the french coast by the million. Did nothing to help them, did nothing to stop the gangs targetting as they flee the eu.
They didn't dump them. They have the choice to apply for asylum in France. Most of them do. Only a small proportion come to Calais because they want to come to the UK. If the UK were taking its fair share the number would be higher. Boat people are only 7% of net immigrants. Or 1/30 of total immigrants. The issue is blown wildly out of proportion by the media and right win politicians.
The Labour Government on election should have declared a 'State of Emergency ' in the English Channel. We need a strong Government to return the boats to France A SAFE COUNTRY! This would immediately put an end to the people smugglers!! The people of this country are furious at having to pay for ILLEGAL ECONOMIC MIGRANTS when under the Illegal Immigration Act they cannot stay here !!
Immigration is often wrongly blamed for economic struggles, but the real issue is growing wealth inequality. This scapegoating diverts attention from complex economic problems. Unresolved wealth inequality fuels neofascist movements, which exploit economic frustrations and blame immigrants and minorities. Housing affordability issues are global, impacting cities like London, New York, and Tokyo. It's a systemic problem, not just local to the UK. Since the 2008 crisis, prices for housing, stocks, land, and precious metals have surged. The wealthiest 0.1% are gaining more wealth, pushing asset prices up and wages down. Central banks printing money since 2008 has inflated prices, making housing unaffordable while wages stagnate. The super-rich benefit, while ordinary families struggle to afford housing and build wealth, widening the economic gap. Wealthy kids get help to buy property, but ordinary families face more difficulty, reducing social mobility. To address wealth inequality, we need progressive taxation on the super-rich, policies to improve asset ownership for everyone, and closing tax loopholes. Increasing working-class representation in politics and media, and fostering unity among diverse groups. The Immigrants that do come here are relatively powerless, the true power is in our biased media (bought by foreign owners) and the asset owning class in the UK. I'm not talking about high income earners, like a £100k doctor. I'm talking about multi-millionaires who have so much money they just let it sit in accounts and earn money for them "money makes money". If you don't have money someone else does. Addressing wealth inequality is crucial to resolving economic struggles and preventing the rise of neofascist movements (Reform UK) and the Le Pen Fascists are key examples. By focusing on the true root causes, we can create improve the UK. Look at Gary's Economics for more: ruclips.net/user/GarysEconomics
How do you strengthen border security when you have a welcoming flotilla to bring them ashore to lavish hotels benefits and immediate health care. It's good that our governing bodies are now thinking the UK has a problem.
Immigration is often wrongly blamed for economic struggles, but the real issue is growing wealth inequality. This scapegoating diverts attention from complex economic problems. Unresolved wealth inequality fuels neofascist movements, which exploit economic frustrations and blame immigrants and minorities. Housing affordability issues are global, impacting cities like London, New York, and Tokyo. It's a systemic problem, not just local to the UK. Since the 2008 crisis, prices for housing, stocks, land, and precious metals have surged. The wealthiest 0.1% are gaining more wealth, pushing asset prices up and wages down. Central banks printing money since 2008 has inflated prices, making housing unaffordable while wages stagnate. The super-rich benefit, while ordinary families struggle to afford housing and build wealth, widening the economic gap. Wealthy kids get help to buy property, but ordinary families face more difficulty, reducing social mobility. To address wealth inequality, we need progressive taxation on the super-rich, policies to improve asset ownership for everyone, and closing tax loopholes. Increasing working-class representation in politics and media, and fostering unity among diverse groups. The Immigrants that do come here are relatively powerless, the true power is in our biased media (bought by foreign owners) and the asset owning class in the UK. I'm not talking about high income earners, like a £100k doctor. I'm talking about multi-millionaires who have so much money they just let it sit in accounts and earn money for them "money makes money". If you don't have money someone else does. Addressing wealth inequality is crucial to resolving economic struggles and preventing the rise of neofascist movements (Reform UK) and the Le Pen Fascists are key examples. By focusing on the true root causes, we can create improve the UK. Look at Gary's Economics for more: ruclips.net/user/GarysEconomics
Labour do not want to stop the migrants, every single migrant is one more vote for Labour. If you want to stop them stop all benefits that the TAX PAYER makes to them and make the world know that is now the case.
A legal route to where? Perhaps these migrants would like to go to Egypt or Syria instead? Why does Egypt and the UAE not accept migrants and refugees?
This is the sensible approach. Like we did with Ukraine and Hong Kong. Decide on a number we can accommodate, transport vulnerable people here safely. Then we can turn away small boats in good conscience. Many of those people are not fleeing war at all, they are just daring young men who have been duped by human traffickers.
@@andybrice2711you can't turn the boats away because they would die if you leave them stranded. But they should do a deal with France to return them to France where they've just left. In return the UK takes an equivalent number who didn't get in a boat. Once it becomes known that everyone who crosses gets sent back people will stop trying that.
The boat loads are free supply of cheap labour for amazon, sports direct, and the other super entitities. Its a means to control wage levels. And who has the government's ear? Same companies. This is why it will never stop.
Labour will never stop the boat migrants.
yep they want the migrant votes
Thats brexit not labour
Just like the tories then.
Oh, is it suddenly ok to talk about immigration now then?! How many of us have been given a rough ride by the media, calling us racists for doing so!
🤔
Typical politician response. Let's rename something.
and do nothing -- just talk.
Another muslim only concerned with palestine israel problems rather than British problems, and threatening Labour too if not carried out on their behalf. 😒
They are the problem
Muslims
Those people know, how dangerous it is to cross the channel. Stop taking that risk, n u won’t loose ur life. Come in the legal way.
The people who cross in boats do so because there is no legal way. They can't apply for asylum until they are physically in the country, and they aren't allowed to enter the country without a visa. If they tried to get on a plane train or ferry they would be prevented from boarding. No one would choose such a dangerous method if there was a better one open to them.
There isn't a legal way, that's why they cross
:- There is a Home Office for the legal route. May well be another government failure.
@@alexd7029 you can't claim asylum until you are in the UK. You can't legally come to the UK without a visa. There is no legal route.
@@Blue_Angel1 :- Then, Don’t come. If no papers and many throwing them in the sea
Deport them with no assessment .
Stop putting them first
Note the talk about the danger rather than stopping them .
Also talk of stopping the 'people smuggling gangs' no mention of them stopping the actual boats. More border security ??? More border control boats to go out and pick them up then. That is what she means.
Italy, Spain and France have had enough and will stop it, so why cant we?
The big problem is, once people arrive here, if they have no documents how do you know who they are and where to return them ???
@@joseflockCan we not find a little island somewhere and they can start their own nation? It worked pretty well with Australia.
@@joseflock If they come from France, return them to France. It is a place of safety but does not put them in hotels, they come here for the freebies and who can blame them when they are on offer for all to see.
Dumb eyes starmer will crush the gangs 😂😂😂
And more will replace the ones he does
😂😂
By sending ferries over to collect them.. he will put them out of business
He couldn’t crush a grape
The only thing Starmer is crushing is, British people hopes for a bright and prosperous future.
The only way this will be resolved is to take away the benefit of crossing making less people want to cross, which will wipe out the incentive for people traffickers. Starmer and his minions are completely back to front in their approach and there will ALWAYS be traffickers while there is a demand. It's not rocket science, it takes strong action.
The action should be comprehensive: These poor people want or need to flee their country of residence, are trafficked galore on their way then may drown.
Why not create a clear and unambigious awareness campaigns about living and working in the UK (EU)😑with the countries they are attempting to leave or even flee? Many refugees are blissfully unaware what awaits them or how long it takes. The process has to be clear even to the uneducated🕊️
@@WellbeingToPeace Sadly to stop this you have to return people there are no winners here.
@@marumaru6084 🙏On the contrary, all can be winners. If our leaders opt to give the Global South a greater role in the UN and/or NATO or other global strategic networks, the opportunity to align them around common principles, values and goals can only increase. We would have united mich quicker against Putin, terrorism, or horrific mass human rights sagas if we do this
The good old "either or" way of thinking could be left behind in favour of new and third alternative solutions, that is IF the parties agree to this, for matters of professional, human rights progress and peace on earth.
In this way, we leave no one behind, The security of human rights entitlement according to international law, the option of choice and skills match could then be offered to the poor, the refugees, as well as globally oriented skilled migration. By 2050 we face 2 billion climate refugees. Hope Labour can come up with a bi partisan plan which may also be of interest to the EU and/or the US. The West cannot continue to absorb all refugees
@@WellbeingToPeace You have this all wrong, the global south do not need to join an USA led organisation to do well.
@@WellbeingToPeacethey are not poor people they are fighting age men you seriously need to get a grip.
Zero sympathy unless there are children forced into the boats by their useless parents
I don’t understand why Britain isn’t claiming money back from the French for doing a bad job. Either fulfil the contract or refund.
There is no objective sufficient contract, and no healthy relationship with France due to brexit. This is also due to the Conservative Party creating immigration as a scapegoat.
Immigration is often wrongly blamed for economic struggles, but the real issue is growing wealth inequality. This scapegoating diverts attention from complex economic problems. Unresolved wealth inequality fuels neofascist movements, which exploit economic frustrations and blame immigrants and minorities.
Housing affordability issues are global, impacting cities like London, New York, and Tokyo. It's a systemic problem, not just local to the UK.
Since the 2008 crisis, prices for housing, stocks, land, and precious metals have surged. The wealthiest 0.1% are gaining more wealth, pushing asset prices up and wages down. Central banks printing money since 2008 has inflated prices, making housing unaffordable while wages stagnate.
The super-rich benefit, while ordinary families struggle to afford housing and build wealth, widening the economic gap. Wealthy kids get help to buy property, but ordinary families face more difficulty, reducing social mobility.
To address wealth inequality, we need progressive taxation on the super-rich, policies to improve asset ownership for everyone, and closing tax loopholes. Increasing working-class representation in politics and media, and fostering unity among diverse groups. The Immigrants that do come here are relatively powerless, the true power is in our biased media (bought by foreign owners) and the asset owning class in the UK. I'm not talking about high income earners, like a £100k doctor. I'm talking about multi-millionaires who have so much money they just let it sit in accounts and earn money for them "money makes money". If you don't have money someone else does.
Addressing wealth inequality is crucial to resolving economic struggles and preventing the rise of neofascist movements (Reform UK) and the Le Pen Fascists are key examples. By focusing on the true root causes, we can create improve the UK.
Look at Gary's Economics for more: ruclips.net/user/GarysEconomics
Starmer is releasing 40k criminals from jails. Where is the concern for their eventual victims?
Also, legal migration into the UK is a much larger problem than illegal migration.
Well the ones coming on the boats are undocumented so how is that not a serious problem to woman and children
And releasing 100,000 illegal migrants waiting in the cue to be put into every town and city - Angela Rayner
Only because the Tories filled the jails and didn't build any more!
Civil rest soon … lions will roar
Only way is leave the European Human Right convention
No, this will open us up to fascism. You are throwing away your own human rights. They exist for a reason. Immigration is often wrongly blamed for economic struggles, but the real issue is growing wealth inequality. This scapegoating diverts attention from complex economic problems. Unresolved wealth inequality fuels neofascist movements, which exploit economic frustrations and blame immigrants and minorities.
Housing affordability issues are global, impacting cities like London, New York, and Tokyo. It's a systemic problem, not just local to the UK.
Since the 2008 crisis, prices for housing, stocks, land, and precious metals have surged. The wealthiest 0.1% are gaining more wealth, pushing asset prices up and wages down. Central banks printing money since 2008 has inflated prices, making housing unaffordable while wages stagnate.
The super-rich benefit, while ordinary families struggle to afford housing and build wealth, widening the economic gap. Wealthy kids get help to buy property, but ordinary families face more difficulty, reducing social mobility.
To address wealth inequality, we need progressive taxation on the super-rich, policies to improve asset ownership for everyone, and closing tax loopholes. Increasing working-class representation in politics and media, and fostering unity among diverse groups. The Immigrants that do come here are relatively powerless, the true power is in our biased media (bought by foreign owners) and the asset owning class in the UK. I'm not talking about high income earners, like a £100k doctor. I'm talking about multi-millionaires who have so much money they just let it sit in accounts and earn money for them "money makes money". If you don't have money someone else does.
Addressing wealth inequality is crucial to resolving economic struggles and preventing the rise of neofascist movements (Reform UK) and the Le Pen Fascists are key examples. By focusing on the true root causes, we can create improve the UK.
Look at Gary's Economics for more: ruclips.net/user/GarysEconomics
Tell these immigrants its our way or the highway
I’ve not read one single comment at all … ever of to keep migration open , we want our culture and country back we’re a tiny island
97% of immigrants are not coming in the small boats. You're complaining about the wrong things. Far more important to invest more in training British people so we don't need so many foreign workers.
@@adrianthoroughgood1191 reform has that in their people's contract. It's a two pronged attack at the problem - a 2 pronged solution. 💙
@@Gill-pc9nm the increase in training was one of few things I agreed with them on. I hope Labour will do something along those lines, but because they promised not to raise any income tax it's going to be difficult to find any money for anything.
Deport, deport, and deport..
New Border Security Officer = Nigel Farage, Reform UK 😂
That's the fascist party, and they only care about themselves not you and your family. Immigration is often wrongly blamed for economic struggles, but the real issue is growing wealth inequality. This scapegoating diverts attention from complex economic problems. Unresolved wealth inequality fuels neofascist movements, which exploit economic frustrations and blame immigrants and minorities.
Housing affordability issues are global, impacting cities like London, New York, and Tokyo. It's a systemic problem, not just local to the UK.
Since the 2008 crisis, prices for housing, stocks, land, and precious metals have surged. The wealthiest 0.1% are gaining more wealth, pushing asset prices up and wages down. Central banks printing money since 2008 has inflated prices, making housing unaffordable while wages stagnate.
The super-rich benefit, while ordinary families struggle to afford housing and build wealth, widening the economic gap. Wealthy kids get help to buy property, but ordinary families face more difficulty, reducing social mobility.
To address wealth inequality, we need progressive taxation on the super-rich, policies to improve asset ownership for everyone, and closing tax loopholes. Increasing working-class representation in politics and media, and fostering unity among diverse groups. The Immigrants that do come here are relatively powerless, the true power is in our biased media (bought by foreign owners) and the asset owning class in the UK. I'm not talking about high income earners, like a £100k doctor. I'm talking about multi-millionaires who have so much money they just let it sit in accounts and earn money for them "money makes money". If you don't have money someone else does.
Addressing wealth inequality is crucial to resolving economic struggles and preventing the rise of neofascist movements (Reform UK) and the Le Pen Fascists are key examples. By focusing on the true root causes, we can create improve the UK.
Look at Gary's Economics for more: ruclips.net/user/GarysEconomics
@Blue_Angel1 A lot of liberal (fascist) left leaning twaddle there. If lefties hate the "super rich" so much then perhaps they need to stop shopping at places like B&M - owned by Billionaires / personal friends of David Cameron and Tory donors. Or better yet, stop getting their entire lives on finance and making bankers lots of money!
But guess what.... they won't..😂
Maybe we could produce some sort of league table to show how many illegal immigrants have perished in the Channel under the watch of each recent Prime Minister? Seems like a reasonable way to measure failure to me...
Hey don’t worry. The worst ex DPP, hated by his colleagues will solve the problems,
The REAL British, those who remember their History, & understand we NEED people to fill so many jobs & pay tax, should be working to WORK TOGETHER to EDUCATE us all toward a better understanding...we need each-other, the 'right-wing' media has continually railed against 'foreigners'....WE CAN DO BETTER!
80 000 migrants who are at least 80% asylum seekers is not a problem. Have a processing centre in France, and let them come legally. Process their claims in a timely fashion. Problem solved.
The highest figure was 47k.
@@adrianthoroughgood1191 So, even less of a problem :)
@@annepoitrineau5650 yes. It's fair enough to complain about immigration because the overall numbers were incredible high last year, at over 1% of the population of the country (nearly 2% if you are talking how many new people arrived and don't deduct the number leaving). But the boat people are such a tiny proportion of that (3% of arrivals) that it's crazy to obsess over them and ignore the other 97%!
@@adrianthoroughgood1191 I agree about the 90 000 boats people. Still, there is the fact that, where students (the largest contigent) are concerned, they come and go. So let's say: 700 000 foreigners arrived year 1, including 350 000 students. The year after, 200 000 students or more will leave, another 300 000 will arrive, so in fact, you could say that it is 100 000+300 000 "others" year one, also year 2. But Reform and the Murdoch Press, as they present immigration in separate years, muddy the waters. Moreover, a lot of Continental Euroepans have left recently, and their jobs need to be filled.
@@annepoitrineau5650 the 700k is the net figure (arrive-leave). The arrive figure was over 1200k. A large proportion of students leave, but not all. Generally the number arriving and leaving each year is about the same, -those that stay, so normally including students is OK. But because of covid there were far fewer students for a couple of years. Now they are coming again but there are none now leaving at the end of their course so the numbers are temporarily inflated. Over the next few years the net figures would drop even if the government did nothing. Which is quite handy for Labour as they can claim credit for the drop.
Considering the number coming over 19 is very small number when compared to the number of people murdered on the streets. The channel is safer than the streets.
Just like they stopped the drug trade. Oops.😵💫
Yes poor young fighting age men 😂😂
They can simply come out the ECHR - But Labour refuse to
Which aspect of enforcement are they talking about? Is it the detection of illegal migrants, not difficult considering they bring themselves to notice. Is it the time taken to process asylum claims? That is an administrative issue not an enforcement issue. Is it the removal of failed asylum seekers? That can only be improved by allowing longer periods of detention while documentation issues are dealt with and judicial reviews are dealt with. Alternatively, judicial reviews should be considered from abroad and costs for 'vexatious' judicial review should be imposed on the activist lawyers.
The idea of creating a new small boats command would be more impressive if it didn't already exist.
I think they are talking about enforcement in France, to stop them leaving French waters.
And how many British people have died at their hands?
Bring is emergency powers like Starmer promised 😊
It’s not a problem that some are dying, they elect to take on an illegal trip. The problem is that a lot are getting through and getting here.
Labour has no answers only Reform has the answer but I am fare so give them a chance 👍🙏
Actions will speak louder than words . As we have hear this all before from Boris Johnson and other before . We had a good chance to have put a block on it before we joined the EU . And at the time E Powell waned of what would happen every one no notice but he has been proved right and having the last laugh .
It should be obvious now that Labour will do nothing to stop the boats if it requires courage.
They are afraid of the smallest amounts of friction. For them all intervention must be as smooth as a handshake. And they will tell the public every kind of lie, travesty and sophistry to try to justify their cowardice.
Fortune favours the brave. But to the timid and hesitating all things are impossible simply because they seem so.
Immigration is often wrongly blamed for economic struggles, but the real issue is growing wealth inequality. This scapegoating diverts attention from complex economic problems. Unresolved wealth inequality fuels neofascist movements, which exploit economic frustrations and blame immigrants and minorities.
Housing affordability issues are global, impacting cities like London, New York, and Tokyo. It's a systemic problem, not just local to the UK.
Since the 2008 crisis, prices for housing, stocks, land, and precious metals have surged. The wealthiest 0.1% are gaining more wealth, pushing asset prices up and wages down. Central banks printing money since 2008 has inflated prices, making housing unaffordable while wages stagnate.
The super-rich benefit, while ordinary families struggle to afford housing and build wealth, widening the economic gap. Wealthy kids get help to buy property, but ordinary families face more difficulty, reducing social mobility.
To address wealth inequality, we need progressive taxation on the super-rich, policies to improve asset ownership for everyone, and closing tax loopholes. Increasing working-class representation in politics and media, and fostering unity among diverse groups. The Immigrants that do come here are relatively powerless, the true power is in our biased media (bought by foreign owners) and the asset owning class in the UK. I'm not talking about high income earners, like a £100k doctor. I'm talking about multi-millionaires who have so much money they just let it sit in accounts and earn money for them "money makes money". If you don't have money someone else does.
Addressing wealth inequality is crucial to resolving economic struggles and preventing the rise of neofascist movements (Reform UK) and the Le Pen Fascists are key examples. By focusing on the true root causes, we can create improve the UK.
Look at Gary's Economics for more: ruclips.net/user/GarysEconomics
@@Blue_Angel1 WRONG. No sensible person in the UK is scapegoating illegal migrants. I can remember when things were very different to how they are now. Numbers matter. You cannot overburden a nation's infrastructure and expect it to function efficiently. No, not even in a society where the distribution of wealth per capita is so even that it is 100% praiseworthy.
There are reasons why people Can't get a doctor's appointment in time, Can't get an ambulance on time, Can't find an NHS dentist to treat them, Die while waiting long in the A&E queues at hospitals, Have to wait a very long time for a call to be answered whenever they phone The DWP or A bank or A council or The NHS. And there are reasons why we have an epidemic of homelessness.
Even a child understands that a limited space cannot accommodate an unlimited number of people.
Anyone who thinks that IF the 14,000 illegal migrants that arrived here on boats in the last 12 months had not come, that the UK would be worse off for them not being here is bonkers.
He won't do anything in fact they want safe routes for them so expect masses upon masses,fools that believe labour!
First question to the interviewer,he doesn't know the answer.
I wonder why he's chosen as an expert voice
Starmer wants to rejoin the eu. Perhaps he can ask them why they dumped these foreigners in camps on the french coast by the million. Did nothing to help them, did nothing to stop the gangs targetting as they flee the eu.
They didn't dump them. They have the choice to apply for asylum in France. Most of them do. Only a small proportion come to Calais because they want to come to the UK. If the UK were taking its fair share the number would be higher. Boat people are only 7% of net immigrants. Or 1/30 of total immigrants. The issue is blown wildly out of proportion by the media and right win politicians.
@@adrianthoroughgood1191 a small percentage, is over 10 million a small percentage? The eu are inheritantly racist as are those who support them.
How do they really think the UK can afford any more dependant people when we can't support our current population.
Having a staunch Europhile in the Home Office does not inspire much confidence that the situation will improve anytime soon.
The Labour Government on election should have declared a 'State of Emergency ' in the English Channel. We need a strong Government to return the boats to France A SAFE COUNTRY!
This would immediately put an end to the people smugglers!!
The people of this country are furious at having to pay for ILLEGAL ECONOMIC MIGRANTS when under the Illegal Immigration Act they cannot stay here !!
NO SYMPATHY . THATS A FEW WE DONT NEED TO HOUSE.
Immigration is often wrongly blamed for economic struggles, but the real issue is growing wealth inequality. This scapegoating diverts attention from complex economic problems. Unresolved wealth inequality fuels neofascist movements, which exploit economic frustrations and blame immigrants and minorities.
Housing affordability issues are global, impacting cities like London, New York, and Tokyo. It's a systemic problem, not just local to the UK.
Since the 2008 crisis, prices for housing, stocks, land, and precious metals have surged. The wealthiest 0.1% are gaining more wealth, pushing asset prices up and wages down. Central banks printing money since 2008 has inflated prices, making housing unaffordable while wages stagnate.
The super-rich benefit, while ordinary families struggle to afford housing and build wealth, widening the economic gap. Wealthy kids get help to buy property, but ordinary families face more difficulty, reducing social mobility.
To address wealth inequality, we need progressive taxation on the super-rich, policies to improve asset ownership for everyone, and closing tax loopholes. Increasing working-class representation in politics and media, and fostering unity among diverse groups. The Immigrants that do come here are relatively powerless, the true power is in our biased media (bought by foreign owners) and the asset owning class in the UK. I'm not talking about high income earners, like a £100k doctor. I'm talking about multi-millionaires who have so much money they just let it sit in accounts and earn money for them "money makes money". If you don't have money someone else does.
Addressing wealth inequality is crucial to resolving economic struggles and preventing the rise of neofascist movements (Reform UK) and the Le Pen Fascists are key examples. By focusing on the true root causes, we can create improve the UK.
Look at Gary's Economics for more: ruclips.net/user/GarysEconomics
How do you strengthen border security when you have a welcoming flotilla to bring them ashore to lavish hotels benefits and immediate health care. It's good that our governing bodies are now thinking the UK has a problem.
That's rookie numbers! Lets pump those numbers as far as we can!!!
Labour will let them all in.
Immigration is often wrongly blamed for economic struggles, but the real issue is growing wealth inequality. This scapegoating diverts attention from complex economic problems. Unresolved wealth inequality fuels neofascist movements, which exploit economic frustrations and blame immigrants and minorities.
Housing affordability issues are global, impacting cities like London, New York, and Tokyo. It's a systemic problem, not just local to the UK.
Since the 2008 crisis, prices for housing, stocks, land, and precious metals have surged. The wealthiest 0.1% are gaining more wealth, pushing asset prices up and wages down. Central banks printing money since 2008 has inflated prices, making housing unaffordable while wages stagnate.
The super-rich benefit, while ordinary families struggle to afford housing and build wealth, widening the economic gap. Wealthy kids get help to buy property, but ordinary families face more difficulty, reducing social mobility.
To address wealth inequality, we need progressive taxation on the super-rich, policies to improve asset ownership for everyone, and closing tax loopholes. Increasing working-class representation in politics and media, and fostering unity among diverse groups. The Immigrants that do come here are relatively powerless, the true power is in our biased media (bought by foreign owners) and the asset owning class in the UK. I'm not talking about high income earners, like a £100k doctor. I'm talking about multi-millionaires who have so much money they just let it sit in accounts and earn money for them "money makes money". If you don't have money someone else does.
Addressing wealth inequality is crucial to resolving economic struggles and preventing the rise of neofascist movements (Reform UK) and the Le Pen Fascists are key examples. By focusing on the true root causes, we can create improve the UK.
Look at Gary's Economics for more: ruclips.net/user/GarysEconomics
Small boats what small boats they aren't
Dinghies
make or break issue for labour...
Make or break what?
They're on day 1 of a 5 year term
They have just been voted in
Why don’t labor get out of the EchrThat is the only way you’re gonna move the illegal immigrants
Britain the only uslim, country to own A . Icbm. Says usa,
Vote reform for that it’s simple
We want it STOPPED
Starmer doesn’t know how!!!!!!!!!
Border control will be picking them up instead of Our taxi service! Nothing to see here
you'll be sorry you voted labour...
Come on yvette you wanted the job
Labour do not want to stop the migrants, every single migrant is one more vote for Labour. If you want to stop them stop all benefits that the TAX PAYER makes to them and make the world know that is now the case.
Immigrant aren't allowed to vote in general elections unless they gain citizenship, which takes at least 10 years.
SOOOOOOOOOO WHATTTTTTTT?
Lets build a wall 😂
How to get the political point popped in compared the measly 250 to the Palestinian 30000
Ooop what a shame never mind ay.
Cut your videos correctly
Perhaps constructing a legal route for refugees would and migrants would be a start.
A legal route to where? Perhaps these migrants would like to go to Egypt or Syria instead? Why does Egypt and the UAE not accept migrants and refugees?
This is the sensible approach. Like we did with Ukraine and Hong Kong. Decide on a number we can accommodate, transport vulnerable people here safely. Then we can turn away small boats in good conscience. Many of those people are not fleeing war at all, they are just daring young men who have been duped by human traffickers.
@@ataxpayer723Maybe because England is the one that supports the war?
@andybrice2711 we don't want any they are not our problem
@@andybrice2711you can't turn the boats away because they would die if you leave them stranded. But they should do a deal with France to return them to France where they've just left. In return the UK takes an equivalent number who didn't get in a boat. Once it becomes known that everyone who crosses gets sent back people will stop trying that.
STOP GIVING THEM OUR MONEY AND COSY BEDS
And stop supporting wars and stealing their resources
Stop supporting wars in their countries
The boat loads are free supply of cheap labour for amazon, sports direct, and the other super entitities. Its a means to control wage levels. And who has the government's ear? Same companies. This is why it will never stop.
The boat people are only 3% of immigration. Work visas are way way higher.
Not at all.
It's to bring down an enemy of Xhina - i.e. any democratic western country by flooding them, just like Tibet
Only the desperates will want go to britain .nothing there .
Starmer needs to deal with Netanyahu or he will be ousted from his position.
13 hours in and not one up vote for your comment… bit sad.
He won't. Very few people care that much. I hope that he will be tougher than Sunak though.