Live from Wimbledon - Day 10
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 июл 2024
- Catherine, David and Matt are live immediately after Lorenzo Musetti's five set victory over Taylor Fritz to reach the Wimbledon semi-finals. There's chat about Musetti's tactical mastery to tun the match in his favour and how this feels like one that got away from Fritz. Elsewhere, there's a Next Gen reckoning, sympathy for Alex de Minaur, and chat about how Elena Rybakina and Barbora Krejcikova got through to the last four. Is this tournament on Rybakina's racquet? How can Krejcikova disrupt her? And what might happen in the other semi-final between Jasmine Paolini and Donna Vekic?
Спорт
These livestreams, whether I catch them or have to watch later, are the highlight of my day.
Musetti finally came to the age !
So good for Art Tennis proves that still can WIN !
Best show on UTube
I miss Wimbledon. Next year will be 40 years since Boris won and introduced me to tennis. Great stuff- Wimbledon❤
"Musetti's a serial disappointment" 😂 Brutal from David
maybe it's a LOVE HUSTLER trait.
I've been on holiday in Florida during Wimbledon but I've loved the live RUclips shows to keep me upto date! Great job. 😊
"Dormant volcanoes". Brilliant, Matt.
catherine whitaker cracks me up. You are the best. "I spend a lot of time worrying about Elena Rybakina" really got me 🤣
Why though?
I didn't even remember that Fritz was an original Next-Gen! ha!
With that said, the "Next-Gen" was , and still is, a marketing ploy.
Anna Rybakina would be a great guest. Make it happen 🙏
I worry about Krejickova's forehand vs Rybakina. Rybakina will probably target the forehand a lot on serve. Actually think Rybakina will probably win the whole thing out quite easily but Barbora has the best chance to beat her if she has a good forehand and serving day and brings the variety.
Babora will need to rely on being wily
54:44 In England, a hundred miles is a long way. In America, a hundred years is a long time.
I don't know where this comes from, but I think I read it in one of the Outlander books.
It always amazes me how the media and journalists who have little understanding of what it takes to be a professional athlete find it so easy and are so willing to criticise and pretty much disrespect top professional tennis players in one of the most competitive sports in the world. Zverev, Tsitsipas, Rublev, etc. have all had good success despite being up against the three greatest tennis players OF All TIME! even if they wore towards the latter years of their career and now their up against Alcaraz who is a phenomenom and Sinner.
As an Oregonian who now lives in Ohio, I appreciate that you guys pronounce Oregon more correctly than the people where I live 😂
I’d like to point out that Canada has some amazing doubles players, especially in The men . And now, Debrowski!
Greetings from Rimini Italy…sorry for Sinner…bad match opponents sequence…come on Musetti and Paolini ❤
Thoroughly enjoyable 😉
The Big Three - Rybakina is a grass court queen, Sabalenka is a hard court queen, and Swiatek takes clay. I don't see Rybakina or Sabalenka winning RG, just like I don't see Swiatek winning Wimbledon.
I thought Iga would win Wimby at some point but changed my mind after seeing Krejcikova's and Rybakina's QF matches.
Tsitsipas is still 25 years old & has achieved World #3, reached 2 Grand Slam Finals, 6 Slam SFs, 8 QFs & 13 Slam R16s & has beaten all of the Big 4 multiple times including Federer, Nadal, Murray 2x at Slams & was 2 sets to love up on Djokocic at the RG Final. Elbow Surgery, Shoulder injury & then low back injury & coaching issues have set him back. Only Zverev - 27 yrs & Medvedev - 28 yrs old have achieved more in the Next Gen. Stef has 4 Big titles. Tsitsipas, Zverev & Medvedev are very different from the rest of the Next Gen players like Hurkacz (27), Rublev (26), Fritz (26), Tiafoe (26), Coric (27), de Minaur (25), Tommy Paul (27), Casper Ruud (25), etc
Zero titles
@@j.s3300 Stefanos Tsitsipas has 11 Titles, 29 finals. 4 Big Titles - 3 Masters 1000 & 1 Nitto ATP Finals.
@@MusicMendicant grand slam titles...duh
@@j.s3300 Out of the 2 dozen original ATP Next Gen Generation, how many have slams? Only one. The oldest one - 28 year old Medvedev. Duh!
Tsitsipas is 25. Let's wait & see. Not everyone can be like juiced up Screaming Cyborg Carlos Alcaraz.
@@MusicMendicant thats why they said they have failed.
The ,mens game has seen so many good players who have not progressed in the last few years. It can be argued that they’ve missed their opportunities with the newly established top players in Alcaraz and Sinner. It’s a shame about Tsisipas, he was really good a few years ago. He needs to make a lot of changes now to have any chance for the rest of this year and moving forward.
beautiful matt
Yes, agree Fritz is a maximizer. But his lack of variety has been frequently exposed by the elite players. He'd said his aim was top 5 but for that he'd need to add a lot to his game.
Well, at the end of the day they are all young, healthy and rich. There is much worse than not reaching the SF of a grand slam tournament😁
Ostrava!
Fritz game is boring, relying on ground-stroke power without much of an imagination, plus as a person he seems to be quite arrogant, very much like Zverev. the way I see it, Meddy and Nole are the only ones left to disrupt Carlos and Janik to win all of it, and that is just for right now. we are maybe heading in the era of big two quite soon. I know that Rune was in this conversation as well, but as for now, he is not even close (apart of his talent - but then again, Nick was gigantic talent and nothing apart of Wimby final came out of it).
FORZAAAAA LORENZO 🔥🔥🔥 hope he can beat Fraudovic, or at least give him THEE hardest time possible 🙏
You will never learn...
😅😅😅😂😂😂
I think Paolini will win it and I think if she meets Rybakina in the final she will stay with Rybakina in terms of power hitting, but she will mix it up and cause problems because I thought you guys do that perhaps Navarro was going to win. Paolini is definitely rewriting the script. I’m picking Paolini to win Wimbledon.
Maybe a bit harsh on Medvedev and Zverev. Both have won a bunch of Masters. Medvedev's GS record is not all that different to Murray's. Both have beaten the top 1-3 players in Slams and other tournaments. At the moment Medvedev is about 21st best of the Open Era, just behind Vilas and Wilander!
Big difference between slams and masters though
They are just being negative. Who really cares how much they win. Unless they look at it from a is this good for tennis inc. as yes it would be nicer to have new stars.
@@Jalleur14325 Medvedev is 75.67% in slams. 1 win, 5 finals, 2 semis. Puts him just about in the top 20 post open era. I suspect had you told him he'd achieve this in 2017 he'd have been more than happy! He may even improve on this in the next few years. Zverev not far behind him!! He also may have been content knowing this in 2017?
I bet the winners this year will win by retirement or walkover 🤣
MUsetti to beat Novac
💯 Dave. Stefanos et al will not win a Grand Slam.
Wimbledon shop sells umbrellas for £50. No thanks.
Krejcikova talked about “the big 4” after she won Dubai in 2023(beating Sabalenka, Pegula and Iga when they were number 2, 3 and 1 respectively back to back to back)
In 2022 Rybakina and to a lesser extent, Sabalenka were not even remotely compared to Iga and Iga was just starting her own dominance before she won the US Open.
The “big 3” talk started when Rybakina and Sabalenka had a close AO final 2023 match with Sabalenka winning her first slam after Rybakina beat Iga when she was the favorite and then Rybakina beat Iga and Sabalenka to win Indian Wells before Rybakina got to the Miami final a week later.
Unfortunately Krejcikova’s “big 4” comment came just before she was completely obliterated by Sabalenka and she slowly disappeared from the top of the wta from there.
I sooo disagree with (according to at least David and Catherine) players needing to pretend like they're fine physically or form-wise when they're not. Just be honest! Why should the truth need to be sub-par?! Have some Integrity ans speak the truth
21:00 Catherine can’t seem to understand that tennis is more than “mental, heart”.
It makes sense that she can’t accept it as it is the essence of her commentary and analysis.
Taylor and Tommy lost because of the bad karma of their influencer girlfriends. They both allowed their gfs to become the story, and they didn’t deliver the goods, the Wimbledon gods have spoken.
Stop blaming women for men's failures. Ridiculous misogyny.
No, they lost because they weren't good enough on the day. How are you finding a way to blame them failing to play well enough on the women who sat supporting them. Ridiculous. One of the weirdest takes I've ever read.
Sorry but it’s true
@@gb3777 Yeah, it’s not though.
I hoped, that this year WTA/ATP/ITF, would stop this nonsense of mixing sport with politics.
Every player should have right to play under her/his country's flag. One cannot choose the country of one's birth.
Appointing "flag police" at tennis tournaments is not even childish... it is embarrassing and insane...
Wars are run by politicians not sportsmen/sportswomen.
Why during the invasion of Iraq, 20 year bombing of Afghanistan, Syria, Yemen and Pakistan not to mention the genocidal Vietnam war US, Australian, UK... athletes were allowed to compete under their national flag?
USA invaded Iraq in 2003 and yet their flag was still allowed at the World Cup 2006 in Germany and 2010 in South Africa despite the fact they were still in Iraq.
Either ban ALL flags of countries who go to war, or don't ban any of them.
Interestingly enough Israeli tennis players Mika Buchnik and Guy Sasson are allowed to play under the national flag in AO 2024 despite the policy of their government towards Palestinians in Gaza.
***
All wars are equal, but some wars are more equal than others.
Why this Medvedev's win is presented as some kind of upset?
After all he is a former number 1 player in the world.
Grand Slam administrators, sponsors, Western media and even... highlight editors can't stomach the idea that Russian players are still participating in their events let alone winning them.