@@seanmcdonnell2649 Yeah, 9 goals against one of the worst teams in history, and McDavid only got points on 2 of them... We are still good without him. But you can't just pull the best player out of the roster and expect everyone else to adapt to their new roles so fast
@@tequila6306 There is no trade possible in this universe where trading McDavid for a set of players equal to $12 million that could result in a winning trade for Edmonton. I'd argue that most elite players cannot be traded without losing the trade, like MacKinnon, Matthews, and Kucherov at the moment.
So you're telling me a team gets worse when they lose the best player on the planet? That's so crazy...
Not even going to watch the video, dumb take. We beat the Golden Knights 5-1 without 97. Nuff said
1-1-1 without McJesus in the lineup... he comes back and the Soilers score 9 goals... without McJesus, the Soilers are pretty average.
@@seanmcdonnell2649 Yeah, 9 goals against one of the worst teams in history, and McDavid only got points on 2 of them... We are still good without him. But you can't just pull the best player out of the roster and expect everyone else to adapt to their new roles so fast
@@seanmcdonnell2649 having an average team with 12 million dollars out of the line up is more of a good thing than a bad thing, no?
@@tequila6306 There is no trade possible in this universe where trading McDavid for a set of players equal to $12 million that could result in a winning trade for Edmonton.
I'd argue that most elite players cannot be traded without losing the trade, like MacKinnon, Matthews, and Kucherov at the moment.
Oilers are mid. McDavid will NEVER win here.