@@sky-games with my friends we decided to do as they say in the video. When whe chose our card, we keep it only in front of us, then at 3,2,1 we all reveal at the same time both the card and WHERE we put it. Otherwise we noticed that if the first chooses its side he can infuence the others (expecially where ther's an objective like "exactly two 4s and there's one already down) and it's not correct in a simultaneous game. Between two cities doesn' t have this issue because you always chose two tiles per turn.
Two things... 1. Agree with public goals and could increase number in the iiddle for more complexity. 2. On Chris's issue with revealing cards. Could you choose where youre placing them, put them face down, and flip at the same time. Thanks for the video. Had on my wishlist, took it off, now put it back on. 😊
So what happens when you don't score on one side (essentially a zero), so anything you get on your other side won't matter. Zero times whatever number is always zero...Please clarify. Thank you.
@@sky-games What I was actually wondering, is if they could've made a game that's just sushi go plus point salad. You draft regular cards and scoring cards. That's it. for 2-whatever players. without the whole 'between two castles' aspect.
I love between castles of mad kind Ludwig but ive run into problems teaching the iconography to folks. These seems to distill down the mechanisms that I enjoy about it down to simple to understand concepts.
12:46, that must be a thing in the english rulebook. In the dutch rulebook it clearly states that you show in which zone you will play it in.
Yes right you prepare your card face down in the zone you wanna play it.
Because chosing a side is already Interaction with my neighbor
@@sky-games with my friends we decided to do as they say in the video. When whe chose our card, we keep it only in front of us, then at 3,2,1 we all reveal at the same time both the card and WHERE we put it. Otherwise we noticed that if the first chooses its side he can infuence the others (expecially where ther's an objective like "exactly two 4s and there's one already down) and it's not correct in a simultaneous game.
Between two cities doesn' t have this issue because you always chose two tiles per turn.
Thanks guys for your words. 😊
Two things... 1. Agree with public goals and could increase number in the iiddle for more complexity. 2. On Chris's issue with revealing cards. Could you choose where youre placing them, put them face down, and flip at the same time.
Thanks for the video. Had on my wishlist, took it off, now put it back on. 😊
So what happens when you don't score on one side (essentially a zero), so anything you get on your other side won't matter. Zero times whatever number is always zero...Please clarify. Thank you.
I keep thinking of Flexo from Futurama
sushi go + point salad + between two cities.
The 2 player variant is basically combining just the first 2, and might work as its own game, no?
Yes the 2 player version is really strategic
@@sky-games
What I was actually wondering, is if they could've made a game that's just sushi go plus point salad. You draft regular cards and scoring cards. That's it.
for 2-whatever players.
without the whole 'between two castles' aspect.
I love between castles of mad kind Ludwig but ive run into problems teaching the iconography to folks. These seems to distill down the mechanisms that I enjoy about it down to simple to understand concepts.
Uno, Splito, Cabo. Come on Walmart, it's just waiting to happen!
Make like a banana...
...and please be a-peel-ing