2024 Blizzard Rustler and Sheeva Ski Collection Overview with SkiEssentials.com
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 июл 2024
- Blizzard let the cat out of the bag today on the new Rustler and Sheeva lines and we're psyched to share our thoughts and experiences on them thus far! We're looking forward to spending more time on these skis and putting together individual reviews. In the meantime, enjoy this video, follow the link to detailed specs, and let us know if you have any questions!
Available for purchase later this month!
Written Article: www.skiessentials.com/Chairli...
0:00 - Intro
4:15 - Construction
11:40 - Shape
16:25 - Length Breakdown
18:20 - Rustler 9 Performance
23:20 - New Rustler 9 Competitors
24:35 - Rustler 10 Performance
I'm getting more and more impressed by Jeff's jacket quiver
I swear I was borrowing the yellow jacket!
@@SkiEssentials The Harlaut-esque steezy jacket length is epic my guy!
He's one flashy dude ! His red/chartreuse ensemble is a hit. it helps the unfamiliar distinguishing them on the slope.
I just want his hand me downs...
The changes look really nice and even if my 2023 skis hasn't arrived yet I'm already thinking that the new Rustler 10 will be a contender to add to the quiver! Awesome video as always guys!
Yeah, the changes are pretty awesome. I (Jeff) really like that new Rustler 10. Great mix of strength and maneuverability.
Had the Rustler 9 2022, just skied the 2024. This is a totally different ski. Wow! Even on hard paked snow they were very responsive. Great improvement
We've had a lot of fun on it this year for sure!
I like your new video format with some front and side view`s from the skiing⛷part and also the detailed closeup’s indoor👍🏼😎
Keep up the good work😉
Awesome, thank you!
dont ever stop guys. No gear review even comes close to your level of epic.
If you keep watching, we'll keep producing!
Just ordered the new 10s! You guys have them first 👏🏻
Thanks, enjoy!
Good review fellas.
Thanks Chris!
Sounds like some promising changes to the lineup; thanks for sharing your experiences! Now, what’s not so promising (by the looks of it in the videos) is your snow conditions 😮! I almost feel guilty for how much snow we’ve been receiving here in Utah - y’all need to make a trip out! Dream season so far
Don't worry about it too much, we're happy for you! Enjoy every last flake!
Im super excited to see a comparison between the new 24 Rustler 11 and a Black Crows Anima. Should be an interesting one considering they're more similar sounding than different now. I hope to see it happen! Also, I called a new Rustler was coming back in November 2021 😉
It's about time on those Rustlers! Hopefully we can get some snow here and make that comparison happen!
Just ordered 2023.hopefully not disappointed
They've been great skis for almost half a decade--that does not change. Have fun!
SE
The construction change makes sense with the introduction of the hustle. However on Paper the construction makes it seem like quite a few other all mountain skis. Mindbender, stance, ORb, etc...
We are seeing a lot of similarities in build philosophies these days for sure!
I would love if you put a team in Utah to do reviews. Conditions, terrain, and overall use case are so far removed from the east that it would be awesome to see folks out here doing reviews. The reason I bring this up, is that I really like how you go about reviews. This would be a great benefit to the mountain west.
ruclips.net/video/VfH2kL4QnaM/видео.html
Oh boy is this great ⛷❄️
Another fun video…keep up the great work! Just for fun curiosity thought, but will the Hustle skis get updated too?
Not for next year--same ski and graphic.
@@SkiEssentials thanks for the info…loving the new videography showing the skis up close too 👍
It's the 9th of January, 2023, and we are talking about 2024 skis. Makes perfect sense. :) Man, I kind of like how they were different than most other skis with the shape of their partial Ti. Now it looks just like a Kendo or Mantra with the rim metal, or like you said, close to the Fischer Ranger with rim metal that doesn't extend around the whole tip. Was really eyeing the Rustler of 2022 or 2023. I look forward to your full review to see if really keeps the old Rustler personality.
I think something that's going to be somewhat important to remember is the current Rustlers are still really good skis. Award winning, proven skis. I wouldn't want someone who owns them or is considering them to all of a sudden feel like they own inferior skis. Are there objective improvements to the new skis? Yes, I think there are, but it's improving over an already really good ski. Anyways, first thoughts are yes, definitely keeps the old Rustler personality, especially the 10. The 9 feels a little different mostly due to the width I think, but still has the same overall personality. I'm also really looking forward to spending more time on them!
Hi. Love your best on the web ski review content! I'm hoping to get your advice on whether the latest Volkl Kendo 88 + the latest Blizzard Rustler 10 could make a strong and logical 2 ski quiver for firmer vs softer snow days as an advanced skier spending 70% of my time on piste? Some days I like to charge fast on groomers, others I like to take my time and play further afield. At 172 cm and 175 pounds, would you advise a length slightly above or below my height with these skis? Other thought is could the rustler 9 be a sweet-spot 1 quiver option for this application? Thanks!
I think that sounds like a great combo. It meets two of my main needs in that the skis are more than 10 mm apart underfoot, and second, they have dissimilar intentions. You may find that you really like the Kendo for most everything, and the Rustler is saved for deeper and softer days. If you are more of a minimalist, you could ski the Rustler 9 any day all day, but I really like the power and grip of the Kendo to match the floatiness of the Rustler 10. I'd go below head high for the Kendo especially, but maybe the 174 in the Rustler.
I really need to test Blizzard ski this winter. My son got a couple of sl wc skis when he raced junior and they were built like tanks !! I have never seen such big edge on race skis, lot of metal and super durable. Are other skis like the rustler and other all mountain build like that or similar to other brand ? My impression was the construction was very high quality. I have to try the rustler and their 93-96 wide ski. Good review as usual, very good explanations.
Blizzard has excellent production and finish quality. Nordica would be the quickest and easiest comparison as the two brands are under the same roof or ownership. Both of their skis just feel very well made and solid. Definitely try to get on a pair if you can!
I noticed on the most recent info sheets that the 2024 R10 is almost identical in weight to the 2023 H10. Can you speak to how these two skis are most different now that they are almost the same weight? Is it more about flex pattern and weight distribution fore-and-aft in the ski? If the info I saw was correct there's less than a 1.5 oz difference per ski!
I'm now a bit split between putting a shift on a hustle 10 or waiting for the 24 rustler 10.
I think I may pull my shifts off of the R11 and put Pivots on it.
I don't have them on the scale, but I'm seeing the 2024 Rustler 10 as 1995 grams per ski in 180 while the Hustle 10 is 1780 in the same length. While not insignificant, it does beg the question of how touring oriented the Hustle truly is. They have the same core now, but the Rustler uses metal underfoot and into the tips and tails along the side rather than carbon of the Hustle. If you're looking for more pop and energy and can deal with less stability at speed, I'd get Hustle, but if you don't mind lugging a few hundred extra grams up to the top, you'll be rewarded with Rustler's amazing freeride performance.
Great explanation. Re the 9: So for someone that has an oldschool narrow stance,swivel hips, rapid short turn style is the new 9 version @ 96 going to feel stiffer, wider and more clunky? I was leaning towards the 2023 rustler 9 172 length @92mm width because of the comments like "this ski can adapt to any size turn and is super fun and playful" and reviews that mention it being awesome for the narrowest terrain and trees and moguls. Also does the 2024 being more freeride make it less of a rapid oldschool turns, tree and mogul ski? BC the 2024 looks like it skis more like a freeride carving enforcer than the 2023. Whereas the 2023 looks more like a short turn freestyle/mogul enforcer. Or would you recommend a different ski altogether for someone who wants to ski narrow stance oldschool super fast bouncy playful turns?
I'd say you're pretty right on in terms of the 2023 Rustler being a bit better for shorter turns and moguls. The new ski, in addition to being wider, also has more rocker, so while it'll swivel pretty well, it won't quite grip in those shorter turns like the older/current ski. For your stats and application, I'd go 2023 Rustler 9. Have fun!
SE
I’m glad they added the 192cm length to the Rustler 10. 188cm as longest was too short.
Agree that the 192 is a fantastic addition, and it makes sense given the 6cm increments.
Hi guys, a couple of weeks ago I skied a 2023 rustler. 9 I absolutely loved the playfulness and both on-piste and off-piste control I had with these. (I was in europe so very little real powder this year).I would say I'm an advanced skier. I was now looking at buying a pair of 2023 rustler 9 at 180cm, but they seem to be sold out of everywhere in my size . Now in doubt if I should get a 2023 hustle 9, which I seem to be able to get a good deal on, or wait until I can get 2024 rustler 9? I generally ski in Europe at the higher resorts with mixed freeriding, groomers and moguls. I won't hit he park too often. I'll probably outfit my skis with an alpine binding and will not do any touring on these. Do you guys really think one will he better than the other for my purpose?
Hello! Hustle 9 isn't going to give you quite the same stability as the Rustler 9. From the sounds of it, it's better to wait and either get a 2024 Rustler 9 or keep looking for a 2023. Actually, I just looked for you, and we definitely have the 180 cm 2023 ski in stock. Here ya go!
www.skiessentials.com/2023-blizzard-rustler-9-skis.html
these are looking pretty twin tippy, do you think someone who leans more to the freestyle skis would enjoy the 9s mounted more forward? not completely centered but im thinking more forward (I ride blackops 118s center mounted and armada JJs at rec)
Hey Tanner! I do think there's some potential for that, yes. I haven't really been on them enough to have a confident opinion. I suppose I can confidently say it's going to work, I'm just not certain to what extent. I play on playing around with mount point on both the 9 and 10, and we'll certainly form more solid opinions on it sooner than later.
So would you say the new Rustler 10 is more Bonafide-ish? I skied last years Rustler 10 and liked it, but was looking for something maybe a little more front side-ish. I still want to hit the bumps and trees, but not a ton of powder. Was considering the Ripstick Black 96 or Mindbener 99ti. Sounds like the new Rustler 10 might be a good option too.
Yes, I'd say the new Rustler is creeping in on Bonafide, but more the 9 than the 10, especially since the 9 is now 96 mm underfoot. If you like the overall feel of the Rustler, the new 9 is certainly worth a look. The Ripstick 96 Black is another ski that is a complete performer, with virtually no downside. The K2 is slightly more rugged, with more metal and a heavier feel, but you get some great on-trail performance as a result--just more sluggish than the Elan or Rustler.
EDGE GRIP: My favorite aspect of my current rustlers. So much so that my enforcer 93’s have been permanently benched. Are the new rustlers still grippy but with less tip deflection? Also, I really wished they moved the 10’s to 106 underfoot. Then I’d finally have my east coast quiver of 2. 96 to 102 doesn’t cut it, really.
Thx
I'd have thought they'd bump the 10 up as well. As far as deflection, I do think the new build offers more stability in those zones while keeping the grip pretty much intact. The 9 is a bit more freeridey in terms of profile, but I don't think that makes it less grippy.
Torn between old and new Rustler 10..if the difference between the old and new 10 is not huge, and you were looking for a more forgiving ski for softer snow. Plus you were someone looking to venture into some off piste skiing after being a mainly on piste skier..which would be the better bet! Thanks
The new version is more sophisticated and polished. It's also more consistent in terms of flex, so you don't end up with such a difference between the very tips and tails and the metal portion in the middle. I very much enjoy the smoothness of the 2024, but that doesn't mean that the 2023 version is all of a sudden a bad ski.
Very off topic, but can you guys do a video on mount points and pros/cons of some? I would find it very helpful! Thanks for the great videos
Great suggestion!
Here I was happy with my Black Crows Quiver of a mirus cor, serpo, atris and nocta....the new nine looks like a combo of the serpo and bonafide. Damn, I want one.
Well, that's a pretty sweet quiver you've got right there. There would be a little overlap between Serpo and Rustler 9, but they do ski differently, probably mostly thanks to the rocker profile. IMO, it would certainly not be necessary to add a Rustler 9, but as someone who loves skis, I can always understand wanting more skis.
@@SkiEssentials you're right. Its not necessary hahaha. I was waiting for the rustler to get that true blend treatment just like you guys! Really can't wait to try out these skis!
I demo'd the 9 in a 186 and really liked the versatility. Right now I have an older Brahma in a 180 and a Nordica Enforcer 104 free in a 186 and was looking for something in between. Something that is great on the groomer as well as bumps and trees. I feel the 104 get a little sluggish when the going gets tight. Maybe I get sluggish when the going gets tight. What length would your recommend (5'10" 200#)? They didn't have a 180 to demo. I'm 64 so not charging quite as hard these days.
I'd go 180--tough when there's no demo, but based on your stats and application, I'd think that'd be the proper size.
I am curious how Rustler 9 compares to the Nordica Unleashed 98 - i demo'd the unleashed and was surprised at how much i liked it, i've had 3 pairs of the original version of the brahma and an older corvus so i always thought i'd just like that feel of alot of wood and ti in a ski - thus the surprise, looking for a ski for trees, moguls, side country, (the mindbender 99 was too much work for me)
While the makers of the Unleashed set out to make a park ski that could also rip all-mountain, the Blizzard folk made a freeride ski that also had some park capabilities. I'd say the Rustler has a greater upside for trees, bumps, and other off-trail activities. Have fun!
SE
Ok, since the Rustler 9 is a little wider and a little more twin tippy, could you elaborate a little on the the new Rustler 9 versus the Unleashed 98 and the Blade Optic 96? It seems like all of these are playful yet somewhat powerful all mountain skis, similar width, and all have enough of a twin tip to at least dabble in the park or ski switch occasionally. I have to fly to ski so these skis that can quite literally handle everything, from refrozen, to powder, to trees, to bowls, to groomers and everything in between (including a little park) are very appealing to me!
For reference, I currently own M5 Mantras and I love them, but in tight trees they're a little much and of course they don't really do park super well (not to say I don't still hit some jumps).
I think there's more to compare with the Blade Optic than the Unleashed in terms of the ski having a freeride oriented twin tip rather than a freestyle one like the Unleashed. What Nordica did is made a park ski that could rip all-mountain while the other two made a freeride ski that could also do park. I think if park is your priority, then Unleashed makes more sense, but for all-mountain and freeride, I'd narrow focus to the Rustler and Line. Between those, it's a pretty close call. I think the Line may have a bit of a leg up in the stability at speed department, but is a bit more of a handful. Either one of those will be great, perhaps sizing and availability will sway your final call?
Well Damm. Just got new (to me) Rustler 10's got about 4 days on them, and NOW you tell me there's a better version. hummphhh.
Your skis are still awesome, though, and you've already skied them and probably had a lot of fun, so there's something to be said about the value of having a good time on snow. I do know what you mean, and I do sympathize with you, but I wouldn't feel too slighted if I were you. Some improvements in these new skis, but they are improvements on skis that were already really good.
I’m 57 6’ 210lb ski 90% blue and black groomers. I’ve been skiing Kendos for 8 years and looking for something new. Been thinking about Rustler 10 but also looking at (because of your review) qst’s what’s your take? I should add I’m looking for a more playful ski. I do spend a week skiing trees at Mt Bohemian.
I think it would be a very reasonable choice to go with the Rustler 10. You're used to skis with some metal in them, and you're likely a strong skier at your size. The Rustlers will give you more playfulness than you have in the Kendo, while retaining some strength and vibration damping that you've become accustomed to. That would be my recommendation!
Intermediate skier looking for something playful to ski with my wife and kids. How do you guys think the 24 compares to the 23 version in terms of playfulness? Is it as playful as the current version, just smoother? Or the playfulness was the trade-off in order to achieve that smoothness and a better edge grip?
It's more sophisticated overall. the shape is more playful while the build is more precise. I think it's smoother and better overall, but still achieves the same versatile and well-rounded nature.
Would you say the 9 is still in the “if you don’t know what ski to get then get this category “
Appears to me with the changes it’s a little more demanding and specific.
We've talked about this quite a bit. I think the bump to 96 mm kind of puts it in the slightly more demanding category. I still think it's right there with others like QST 92 or Elan Ripstick 88, it just might skip some skier's eye line, if that makes sense. At the end of the day, it's still a mid-90's all mountain ski with a sophisticated build, tip and tail rocker, and partial metal, so I'd say it still qualifies.
Love the changes. I was thinking about buying the qst 98 as a playfull all-Mountai/touring Ski in my quiver (Brahma 88, bent chetler 120). Now the rustler 9 seems to get closer to the qst. I have no idea what to buy now :D help!
Ha!
The good news is, you're in the right zone, and between the Rustler 9 and the QST 98, you can't really go wrong. The QST feels a bit shorter of a turn radius, and is a better floater than the Rustler, but the Rustler is a bit more precise on the groomers.
@@SkiEssentials thanks!
Do you know if the Hustle 10 is getting an update in 2024? Particularly sizes. I'm currently between a 164 and 172
Thank you for all your efforts!
Nope, Hustle is staying the same for 2024. I think given the light weight, if you're in between, it's okay to size up.
I'm 6'2 220 look great ski hard. What length would you recommend the rustler 10s? Have a pair of the rustler 11s at 188
I'd go 186 in that ski.
For an advanced skier getting their first set of skis, and liking the general concept of the Rustler 9, does the '23 make more sense vs spending more for the '24? And for sizing does 172 or 180 make more sense for a middle-aged guy 5'11" 190lbs?
I'd think that based on your stats and application, if you're looking to save a few bucks, the 23 is more than fine. It's been a great ski for years, and that will not stop just because something slightly more refined just came out. I'd go with the 172 in that ski. Have fun!
SE
I was kind of sad that I already bought a 100 underfoot ski this season because the Rustler 10 seems just about perfect for how I ski.... but I don't think I could live with those graphics, so things worked out alright in the end
I was kind of surprised the 11 didn't get the black and orange treatment that the 10 got, but I do like it. I can certainly understand not liking it, I suppose, so seems that all is right in the world. ;)
@@SkiEssentials Hopefully they'll have them at demo events later in the year, maybe seeing/skiing them will change my mind. Either way, the changes look great; a playful shape with a metal frame is something I've been interested in for a while
Thanks for the impressive video. I wanted to buy the Rustler 9 in 180 cm in 2023 and have now seen the difference to the Rustler 2024 in the video. I am an advanced skier at 1.80 m and 70 kg. Does it make sense to buy the Rustler 9 2024 a little shorter because of more metal? Is a whole day on the skis becoming a bit more exhausting now?
Yes, I think that makes some sense. Now for 2024, it comes in a 174, so I'd think that'll be a great sizing option for you.
Gday! Im 181cm and 73kg beginner/intermediate.. which size do you recommend? Cheers!
I've got some new skis this season, saw a good sale for one of the older version of the Salomon QST 85. How do you think this ski will perform with the little snow Europe has gotten so far? (Going to ski in france)
Probably just fine! 85 mm underfoot and with a wider tip and tail, I'd say it'll be great. We were sad to see that ski go as it was a very useful mid-80's all-mountain ski for a lot of different skiers.
Hey there. I’m a 6’1” lower level advanced/upper intermediate skier and ski strictly East coast (Vermont mostly). Need a ski I can ski w my 10 yr old, but also one that can allow me to improve my bump skiing, as well as still maintain edge grip on icy east coast terrain. I mostly use groomers to relax and warm up for bump and tree runs but still appreciate a nice carving ski. Do u think this ‘24 Rustler 9 would fit the bill for me and if so, what size? Currently skiing 4Frnt MSP 99 in 187 and looking for something perhaps a bit more playful and manageable in bumps without giving up too much in the carving and stability department. Based on prior reviews I was all set on the 2023 R9, but perhaps this would be better, or perhaps a Stochli SR 88? Also, what size would u recommend? Thanks!
We were just on the 24 Rustler 9 yesterday and were reminded of how great it is at this type of application. There's some really great carving capabilities to go along with the versatility in that they make very clean and round turns on a variety of conditions and terrain. The 2023 version is still a great ski--that didn't go away overnight. I think the Stockli might be a bit much for skiing with kids, but you'll certainly get the high-end of the performance and quality spectrum with that amazing ski. I'd say the 2024 Rustler 9 is the most versatile of the group. I'd go with that in the 180. Have fun!
SE
Hey! First of all, great videos from you guys, thanks!
Secondly, can you help me out: 183cm height and slightly above 90kg advanced skier looking for addition to his quiver. Been already owning for long time Salomon Rocker2 108 's for off/trees/pow skiing and im now searching for a additional ski pair with more better handling of on-piste/groomer skiing. Although I would still like the pair to own fair capabilities for off-riding/trees to play around with. This pair would come for the use when there's no good pow to hunt for with my older skis, since on-piste skiing is rather dull with Rocker2's.
Right now im stuck between Elan Ripsticks 96's either green or black edition or thirdly, these new 2024 Rustler 9's you just tested out. Lastly I heard a mention from a friend about Atomic Maverick 95ti's that could work well for a stronger type of skier?
Any thoughts or recommendations on this and what ski length would suit the best?
Thanks!
The Maverick is great, it has a light weight but a pretty responsive feel, so it's a bit different from Rustler and Ripstick in that regard. The Ripstick 96, either Black or Green, are about as automatic and fun as they get. The big difference from those to Rustler is the more turned-up tail and more dramatic splay in the tips and tails. This makes Rustler fall more to the freeride side of the spectrum versus Ripstick's more all-mountain shape. If you're putting a bit more emphasis on groomer and front side, I'd lean to the Ripstick, and your stats and application could point to the Black Edition in the 180.
Its interesting from the footage the 10 seems like more of the charger and groomer slayer than the 9 but it may be the conditions on the day and fact Bob was on too short a ski?
I have a 2023 R11 in 188 which I love and want a bwteen storms ski to slot between that and my supershape speed 177 that doesnt fold on me when I push it but gives me heaps more manuverbility and fun with less work than my current MX99.
I have not been disappointed in the R11's performance in any condition or noted a lack of top end. Its a bit less damp and chargy wide skis but its so effortless and predicatible and fun that I hardly care what I have lost because I have gained in ease and manuverbility. So am I on the right track with the new R9 in a 186 or will it not be enough ski? I could go R10 but at 104 underfoot its getting really close to the 11 and I am more after quickness than float.
Level 9 skier, 52 yrs young, most days I ski Whistler Blackcomb.
Thanks in advance guys. Keep up the amazing reviews!
Conditions combined with turn shape preference, I'd say. The filming was difficult due to the fog, so we tried to keep it in shorter turns and closer to the camera to get better footage. I think the 9 in the 186 will be long enough for the style of ski and the application for which you're using it. I like the split of Speed, Rustler 9, and 11. Have fun!
SE
@@SkiEssentials Thanks guys appreciate the input. New R9's wont be here for us in Canada till next season so I decided to go Kore 99 in 184. Not the tree ski the R9 likely would have been but a more powerful, precise mixed condition ski that gives me more fun it the off piste and trees than my MX99.
Would love to hear what the factory-recommended mount points are for the new Rustler 9 & 10 and what Jeff's thoughts are on where he liked them mounted?
We haven't had enough time on the skis to play around with mount point, so we'll punt on that question for now. They skied great with the demo bindings on the line.
How are the top sheet materials compared to the older version. I know the older version is notorious for some top sheet chipping. Are these new top sheets made from the same material?
It seems like a different topsheet material. That said, it's still probably going to chip and peel somewhat, as that's just the nature of how things go out there.
For a powder ski, do you prefer the Rustler 10, Rustler 11 or the Fisher 102?
Pure powder, I take the wide Rustler 11. For mixed conditions and some powder, I'd prefer the Fischer.
Thanks for the nice video. I'm 172 cm 75 kg, and I currently ski the Rustler 10 in the 180 cm. I'd like to move to the 2024 Rustler 9 to get some more edge grip and stability on firm snow. Do you think it is the right move and shall I stay in the 180 cm length or get the 172 cm? thank youy
I'd stay with the 172 based on your stats and application. Great skis!
SE
Demoed the 2023 172 cm Rustler 10 and felt that was a good size, if I were to look at the 2024, should I size down to the 168 cm given the decreased rocker and tip to tail metal? Or would 174 cm be more appropriate? 5 ft 7 in 165 lbs, advanced skier prefer to play in the bumps on the front and back bowls out west. Don't spend much time on groomers, but I do ski at least several days in the east.
I'd think the 168 offers more opportunity in terms of maneuverability and agility without losing too much stability. My fear is that the longer one would feel cumbersome--they're not the lightest skis out there.
Are those binding rails part of the ski or just a demo setup? As I type this I realize that it's 99% likely that you just took the bindings off the demo skis. I have Blaze 94's as a telemark setup and while I generally like a more friendly ski for telemark, I am thinking of getting something with a bit more edge hold. Also looking at Hustler as an alternative.
They are demo plates for the binding. The Rustler 9 is a great option for telemark--not too heavy and has a good mix of grip and smear.
For an intermediate is 168 too long considering they added camber? 5’7” 145, or should I rephrase, do I need to worry about 162 being too short? Like to chase pow, but still run into share of groomer/ice
I don't think 168 is too long by any means! That feels like a much more appropriate length for your size, even given you intermediate ability. I would worry more about 162 being too short.
How would you guys instruct someone on buying the current version of ther Rustler 9 versus the new one. I am a 56 yo 175lb advanced skier. I bought a Volkl Blaze 94 because I though I wanted to dial back ,y aggression based upon age. I feel like i have found the speed limit of he Blaze on East coast hard pack. Not really sure but man made or boiler plate seems to push the Blaze beyond it’s comfort. Wanted the Blaze for it’s light weight but that may be a trait not worth the sacrifice if I can push the ski beyond what i thought I could.
If you're looking for a mid-90's all-mountain ski with some power to it, either Rustler will be great. The new version, with a wider waist and more of a rockered profile, definitely hits some more freeride notes, but the metal extending to the ends in the frame format also makes it a more agile and predictable carver from tip to tail. It's not like the 2023 Rustler 9 is a bad ski all of a sudden--it's been one of the best and most well-rounded skis on the planet for years--that did not just end. If you're the type of skier who actively seeks out the latest and greatest, then the 2024 ski is going to be fantastic. All others will still love the current version.
So wich one do you recommend, the 2023 restler 9 or the 2024 as a all mountain ski, I all ready have a piste ski, rossignol hero elite plus ti, I have and injured foot, so I want something softer for wend the trails are not groom and in bad condition,, I was looking at the Blizzards restler 9 2023 because there no metal, and closer to a all mountain, in the 172, because we don't have big and wide ski hills in the eastern of Canada.
the 2024 version is smoother, more sophisticated, and more polished of a product than the 2023, but that doesn't mean the 2023 is all of a sudden a bad ski. They've improved upon it, so the new one is a very nice upgrade, but it's not like it's leaving the 2023 in the dust.
Jeff, please advice me for freestyle skiing all mountain and trees, what would be the perfect length of a ski to me:
My height is 185cm and weight 80kg.
Currently I'm riding on 184cm length Faction Prodigy 3.0, they are great, but tails and noses to demp to do butters and staff.
I'm looking for a more playfuslashy
I'd say the 180 is the way to go for your stats and application. Have fun!
How do you think the new 10 compares to the Enforcer 104 Free?
That's a good one! it's still not nearly as damp and powerful overall, but it's getting a lot smoother, which is something that the 104 Free always had over the Rustler 10. That gap has narrowed, but I don't think they're going after that ski in terms of top-end performance. That's still Cochise territory.
The tail still suitable for skin attachment and uphill travel?
Like the sound of being a bit more solid in tip and tail though compared to previous model.
Thanks
Yes, it's more rockered and slightly more rounded, but I don't foresee any issues with the skin attaching to the tail.
Thanks. I know this is a fairly subjective question. What would be the strongest directional style ski in the mid 90 range you guys would recommend mounted with a Duke PT ( or shift ) ?
Thanks again in advance . Great reviews as always- enjoying the recent Steadfast review- not THAT long ago that name was attributed to a Nordica “sidecountry “ ski …..
I like my Mpro 90 except they are somewhat squirrelly on groomers at higher speed. would Rustler 10 be better at higher speed?
I don't think groomer speed performance will get much better with the Rustler 10. Maybe in more of a long turn/straight line form, but not really in a carved turn. Maybe something in the middle like a Black Crows Justis or a Nordica Enforcer 100 would answer your needs?
These have similar build to the mindbender. How does the rustler 9/10 compare to the mindbender 99ti?
The Mindbender is considerably more directional and rugged. If you're spending more of your time on groomers or in crud, chalk, and chunder, the denser K2 is a better choice. The Rustler is more nimble and agile, and that does come at the cost of stability at speed.
How would you guys compare this new Rustler 10 to the current Salomon QTS 98?
The QST still has more rocker, especially in the tail. The big difference other than that is the use of metal. For a carbon/flax-powered ski, the QST is surprisingly strong and damp, but the metal of the Rustler takes it to the next level. If I were faced with a big bowl full of crud, I'd want the Rustler to motor through it smoothly and efficiently. For pure powder, trees, bumps, and other zones that require shorter turns, I like the QST.
How do the '24 Rustler 9s compare to the Mantra 6s in terms of the skill level required to enjoy either one? I am looking to upgrade my current Rustler 9s, which are a bit sketchy at speed on hard packed snow, or my Mantra 5s which tend to tire me out.
There is an upgrade in stability at speed in the 24 Rustler. The longer metal on the outside makes a pretty nice difference here. It's still no Mantra, but a nice alternative for sure.
I just got the Volk Deacon 84 for the Midwest and couldn’t be happier with my choice, 99.9% groomers over here. I was looking at the older Rustler for an all mountain ski for out west. Should I get the New or old rustler? The Volkl are my first pair of new skis in ages,besides seasonal renting, skis have come a long way. I rented decent skis too, nothing as nice as a deacon
Great to hear, thanks for sharing!
Hey y'all - looking for a rec. I'm 6'0, 175lbs, 30-40 days-per-year skier in Colorado. The 2023 Rustler 10's at 180 are my daily driver - love them for trees and moguls, which is where I spend most of my time. I do find them skiing a bit short in some scenarios. I'm looking to add a more big mountain ski to the mix - one that can handle some deep chop and hard charging after the steeper lines get played out a bit. I'm leaning towards the 186 in the 11. Am I on the right track there? Having trouble deciding between that or the 192
Hello! Definitely on the right track here. I would say the 186 Rustler 11 would be perfect to take things into more of a big mountain scenario. You don't need the 192. That ski is kind of a beast and at your weight, the 186 is going to have plenty of stability at speed and plenty of float in soft snow. Go for it.
@@SkiEssentials thanks! you guys are the best
Bummer there wasn't much info/direct comparisons on the Sheeva's. Hope to get more info soon.
It's definitely at the top of the list!
Should I stick with my bent 100s or pick up the 10s
Bents are still going to feel much more playful, at least for most skiers. Softer and a more energetic flex pattern. More pop and energy, but not as much vibration damping. Bents are also still closer to true twin tips, where Rustlers are freeride skis with enough rise in the tail to ski switch, but not necessarily twin tips. I'm not convinced a Bent 100 skier would necessarily be a Rustler 10 skiers. Definitely some out there that would like them evenly, but I feel like most skiers would have a preference between the two dependent on skiing style and application.
Saw another review that said the 9 at 186 jumps to 98 underfoot, sounds like you’re saying it’s 96 in all lengths. Can you confirm?
Yes, 186 length does bump up to 98, at least that's my understanding. Apologies if we didn't cover that. We'll be coming back to the Rustler 9 soon with a specific review of that ski, some thoughts on mount points, etc etc.
What’s the difference: 2024 Rustler 9 vs Ripstick 88 vs Line Optic 96 vs Bent Chetler 90 ? Looking for an all condition daily driver good for moguls & trees. Already owns i-titan for pure groomer & teaching, and Bent Chetler 120 for pow. Just want to fill the gap to have a 3 ski quiver. And it will also be my travel ski. Thanks!
If you're looking for something to fill in between the 120 and the Titan, I'd go with the mid-90's Rustler 9 or the Optic 96. This gives you good spacing between the Titan and provides that mid-range of speed and performance for various conditions and terrain. Of those, I like the energy and the pop of the Rustler a bit more than the Line, but it's pretty close!
@@SkiEssentials Thanks! Out of these 4 skis, which one is the best for instructor mogul exam? My titan is a little too stiff for mogul especially when it’s icy. Or is there a better option than these 4 skis?
Safe to assume the 9’s ski shorter than last years model?
I think it's pretty close. If anything, the new model feels like it has more edge contact due to the metal frame, so that kind of smooths it all out. More rocker, yes, so I can see why that would be an indicator of skiing shorter, but overall I didn't get that feeling from the new ski.
Gday from australia! Im 181cm and 73kg who is enjoying blue runs and some easier black runs.. which size in the rustler 9 2024 do you suggest? Cheers!
Either 174 or 180, depending on your level of aggressiveness. If you're seeking speed and value stability and power, then by all means, size up to the 180. If you prefer moderate speeds and more controlled and round turns, I do not think the 174 will be too short. Have fun!
SE
I ride in Tahoe and Mammoth, and have been learning on Bent 90. Im looking for something slightly wider and more focused dfor off piste conditions, rustler 10 or moment wildcat 101?
I can't speak to the Moment specifically, but the new Rustler 10 is certainly a wonderful ski that's directly what you're looking for. For softer snow, precision on-piste, and overall higher performance versatility, it's a fantastic ski.
@@SkiEssentials How about Faction mana 2 or any other options to look at?
How does the rustler 11 compare with the sender 110?
The Rustler feels more stout and sturdy underfoot--capable of carving cleaner turns, but I like the flexibility of the Sender for anything softer. I found it to be very agile and maneuverable in the powder and woods while the Rustler is a bit more of a handful. If you're more aggressive and skiing technical lines, I'd think the Rustler would have more upside.
I just bought the 2023 rustler 9 2 days ago, I didn't even mount my bindings yet. When will you guys have these in stock? I'll go return the current ones I have now
I've been told we'll have them by the end of the month. They're already in Blizzard's warehouse, as far as I know, so in theory shouldn't take long for them to get to us, then up on the site.
When is the full review on Rustler 9 2024 coming out?
It's definitely on the list!
Now rustler 9 and 10 are so similar, how someone can choose between them?
Great question! We brought that up to the good people at Blizzard. I think that the 10 still makes a strong argument for being the wider ski in a quiver while the 9 still sits nicely as a one and only. So, it mainly depends on what you already have or what you plan on getting in the future, if that makes sense.
When will the Rusler 2025 be available for purchase??
We'll be coming out with that review next week. Stay tuned!
Exactly
Do you guys know if the sheeva and rustler use different construction?
Watch the video...literally a section called "construction"
@sunshinecycling this is what happens when I watch these videos with my 4 month old baby, I missed that part LOL. They definitely answered it
Small difference, but more of a difference than what we currently have between Sheeva and Rustler!
Damn looks like a carbon copy of metal design philosophy from Volkl skis... I'd love to see these stacked up on the mantra lines.
We see this frame design in a few companies, including Volkl, Blizzard, Salomon, Black Crows, and even K2. There are variances for sure, but the basic premise of keeping the metal over the edges is pretty consistent here. Rustler will never be Mantra, mainly because of the rounded turn style and more playful character. Mantra is far more business-like in these realms.
Compared to the new Mindbender 99ti?
Probably closer than ever before, Rustler to Mindbender. The Mindbender still feels a touch stronger in the tail, I'd say. The way that I like to think about it now is the Mindbender 99Ti basically falls right in between Rustler 9 and Bonafide 97, allowing for some variance in width, of course.
Not to derail - but have you guys heard any rumblings about the Cochise for 2024? I think I have seen it obliquely in some pictures but has the construction changed?
I have the 2013 (aggressive bull head) and eventually will love them to death as long as my legs continue to be able to power them. Pretty much all the commentary I hear says the OG is marginally better than the current ski. Sigh.
Haven't heard anything, but yes, in the catalog it looks like it returns unchanged from at least two years ago.
It’s a shame you’re in Vermont and not on the west coast our terrain is so different that it can be kind of hard to determine how a ski performs on in steep terrain off piste.
Yeah but we can get a pretty good idea. Filming and getting useable footage on our VT steeps (yes there are some) is a challenge and just isn't an efficient way for us to gather content.
Had higher hopes for the men's top sheets. I am sure the ski rips though.
The 10 is the best looking of the three. All Sheevas are big improvements!
Old Rustler 10 vs new Rustler 9? Thanks
It's getting closer, isn't it? The 2024 Rustler 9 is a lot more agile and prefers to make cleaner, rounder, and smoother turns. I never really found the 2023 Rustler 10 to be a great carver by any stretch, rather it really preferred to be used in softer snow formats and more drifty situations.
Advanced 183cm 95kg. 188 be the go?
186 this year!
Mount point on the 10 still the same?
Fisher 102 or Rustler 102?
The Rustler feels like a sharper turner, a damper ski, and a more rugged overall performer. The Fischer is great, but comes just short of the Rustler in each of those categories. If you're looking for a slightly more playful and flexible ski, I'd go with the Ranger.
interms of stiffness, Where would 2024 Rustler rank amoung these skiis?
K2 Mindbender 99Ti, Salomon QST 98, Elan Ripstick 96
Would the Blizzard be the stiffest?
5' 8" 140lbs , advance/expert skier, ski western Canada
I'd say the K2 is the stiffest of those skis on your list, with the QST next. I'd put the 2024 Rustler 9 on the more flexible side, even than the Ripstick.
Blizzard is going to loose a of customer.
Interesting that you think so! I do think the previous (current) Rustler and Sheeva skis are a little more approachable for an intermediate, most notably the 9, but I also think that's a relatively marginal difference and shouldn't result in significantly fewer Rustler skiers over the next few years.
@@SkiEssentials the new skis might be too rigid for some of the current user
@@whoisthe1412 There's alway a trade off, but will be interesting to see the longer use reviews.
You should note that the Trueblend core allows tuning the stiffness per length, plus there’s the new length breakdown. So it might actually provide more options for upgrades.