Steven Van Zandt: Beatles or Stones

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 5 апр 2016
  • FOX 4 is on Instagram - / fox4news
    FOX 4 News is a FOX-owned station serving Dallas-Fort Worth and all of North Texas.

Комментарии • 45

  • @swmita
    @swmita 6 лет назад +431

    I never looked at it that way when Van Zandt explains that there really wasn't this thing called a band before the Beatles.

  • @stickykitty
    @stickykitty 5 лет назад +385

    Just when I thought I was out
    Rolling Stones pull me back in

  • @alessandrocolumbu
    @alessandrocolumbu 5 лет назад +165

    I said my piece Chrissy!

  • @greenwoodtea
    @greenwoodtea 6 лет назад +116

    steven,,,,,,you are a good guy.....

  • @322killuminati
    @322killuminati 5 лет назад +162

    I never realized how fake his Sopranos accent is until I saw him out of character.

  • @weeooh1
    @weeooh1 4 года назад +44

    Sophisticated answer. He was also old enough to be around at the time to have gotten a good sense of things,

  • @sequentialscenery
    @sequentialscenery 6 лет назад +255

    Beach Boys were around at the time.

  • @allyboybarese2689
    @allyboybarese2689 7 лет назад +174

    They were the first punks, really

  • @slee6261
    @slee6261 5 лет назад +113

    The Beatles were the first punks in Hamburg.

  • @danb1391
    @danb1391 4 года назад +64

    Actually the Beatles initially were punks. When Brian Epstein saw them and signed them, he gave them their sophisticated look and attitude. He made them look classy. But their initial looks was jeans, leather suits and boots. But Brian wasn’t wrong, if he didn’t clean them up the British Invasion May have never happened. Unrelated: Ed Sullivan was at heathrow airport and thousands of fans were there waiting for the Beatles to come back from a tour somewhere in Europe. He assumed it was the queen returning to England. When he found out it we for the Beatles he immediately got in touch with Brian for them to come to his show in America. Who knows if the Beatles ever break America If Ed wasn’t in the airport at that time. Once the Beatles blew the doors off, other bands were able to come here to be discovered and enjoyed, including the stones.
    Beatles.

  • @ianaldridge1702
    @ianaldridge1702 4 года назад +51

    Both legends ,but stones for me.

  • @johnhutchison3908
    @johnhutchison3908 5 лет назад +40

    Stones beatles plus the doors all brill

  • @Oceantreasures24
    @Oceantreasures24 4 года назад +30

    The styles to me aren’t really the same outsider of when the stones would copy the Beatles for a few albums in the 60’s

  • @ThefightingCelt
    @ThefightingCelt 5 лет назад +99

    The Beatles even gave The Stones a song so they could have a hit . After that , it gave Jagger & Richards the kick up the backside they needed to start writing their own songs . As for the question : The Beatles , by a country mile . Longevity is not the mark of greatness . The Beatles ' body of work over 7 years of recording together is nothing short of astonishing . The best pop/rock band ever .

  • @J.A.Hansen
    @J.A.Hansen 5 лет назад +48

    mmmh🤔🙄😁👉Beatles,Stones,The Who,Yardbirds,Cream,Zeppelin,The Jimi Hendrix Expierence...♾

  • @simonjamesyoung8091
    @simonjamesyoung8091 4 года назад +5

    Dude ❗Class

  • @ImperialBluesGuitar
    @ImperialBluesGuitar 5 лет назад +121

    I like the Beatles, but the Stones you can listen to all day long and rarely get tired of hearing them.

  • @joselefian8129
    @joselefian8129 4 года назад +63

    BEATLES ALL THE WAY.

  • @ralphsmallblock4367
    @ralphsmallblock4367 5 лет назад +15

    Creative look at lilyhammer 👍🏻

  • @golfbuddy1969
    @golfbuddy1969 5 лет назад +69

    Not close. The Beatles, in 9 years, recorded 200+ songs, with maybe at least 40-50 being absolutely iconic. And their influence is seen in every genre. The Stones have done this for 50 years, and don’t have half the iconic songs as the Beatles.

    • @da324
      @da324 5 лет назад +24

      But the Stones have something the Beatles didn't, attitude.

    • @anthonylafleur6113
      @anthonylafleur6113 5 лет назад +37

      actually i can name far more popular stones songs than i can beatles.

    • @anthonylafleur6113
      @anthonylafleur6113 5 лет назад +24

      also a lot of beatles songs sound the same, go listen to sweet virginia/dear doctor by stones than switch brown sugar. tell me the beatles could do that.. lol van zandt said it perfectly, beatles were some harmony but if you wanted to get down you listened to the stones

    • @anthonylafleur6113
      @anthonylafleur6113 5 лет назад +4

      and tbh im never gonna listen to music and just start playing heu jude/let it be or hello goodbye type beatles songs. sorry those are just annoying to me now a days. even tho theyre good. i can do beatles songs like get back day tripper sgt peppers

  • @bobf.5538
    @bobf.5538 5 лет назад +9

    I always thought there was something wrong with his head because he has that head wound wrap covering his head and forehead..same with Vince Neil

  • @Jimmy.1143
    @Jimmy.1143 5 лет назад +74

    Obviously The Beatles, without the beatles no stones

  • @PreacherAtArrakeen
    @PreacherAtArrakeen 5 лет назад +48

    Beatles. I don't think the Beatles copied the Stones, but the Stones sure as hell copied the Beatles. Their first hit was even written by them. And they gave it to Ringo.

  • @thaterasound
    @thaterasound 4 года назад +25

    Beatles all day

  • @Officialshayne
    @Officialshayne 5 лет назад +65

    STONES

  • @thisismagacountry1318
    @thisismagacountry1318 4 года назад +27

    Beatles

  • @kenhernandez8128
    @kenhernandez8128 4 года назад +34

    Easily the Beatles

  • @krachenford9594
    @krachenford9594 4 года назад +7

    Four working class boys versus art students?
    Ha ha ha, it's all a mock up.
    By the way, this old woman has a very dark voice . . .

  • @booishoois309
    @booishoois309 5 лет назад +56

    There's only one correct answer to this: Beatles. They did more worth remembering in 10 years than the Stones have done in 50 years. Give it to the Stones for longevity, but not much else.

    • @da324
      @da324 5 лет назад +14

      Great, your opinion.

    • @anthonylafleur6113
      @anthonylafleur6113 5 лет назад +13

      lol... the beatles were just popular.. in my opinion. are you trying to say the rolling stones didnt write like 30-40 hits?

    • @anthonylafleur6113
      @anthonylafleur6113 5 лет назад +19

      i mean if the stones dont qualify as anything more than longevity than what are the other bands to you? stones are arguably most successful band ever..

  • @samspade5824
    @samspade5824 5 лет назад

    If he had a dollar for every time he was asked that hed be a rich man!

  • @CapAnson12345
    @CapAnson12345 5 лет назад +48

    I'm hard pressed to name a single band that was directly influenced by the Stones. The black crowes maybe? EVERYONE was influenced by the Beatles, including the Stones.

  • @scottwallace901
    @scottwallace901 4 года назад +4

    Not where the Beatles got there name. The name comes from the motorcycle gang in the film “The Wild One” who where called the Beetles different spelling.

  • @LRonBrundlefly
    @LRonBrundlefly 5 лет назад +36

    He should have just said: Zeppelin.

  • @knockknock705
    @knockknock705 6 лет назад +24

    I do not agree with his reason he gave for picking the Stones. I expected a better thought out analysis of this.

  • @tektoniks_architects
    @tektoniks_architects 4 года назад +11

    Zeppelin.

  • @Ryan-zy9qg
    @Ryan-zy9qg 5 лет назад +23

    I'm really surprised that the 2 bands was being compared.. beatles is way way better and popular than the stones of course..

  • @ShindlerReal
    @ShindlerReal 5 лет назад +34

    Stones are not as pretentious as Beatles.