A tip for anyone watching this video: watch it in 1080p. In low quality the differences between the 2 lenses are not very clearly, but in 1080p the comparison is incredibly clear and useful. Thanks Tony and Chelsea for the comparison!
So I just sold my 24-105 which was virtually glued to my 5DII for years, and replaced it with the Tamron 24-70. Then, wondering if I made the right decision, found your great comparison review. (I love having my opinion confirmed by experts) I had both lenses briefly and my quick testing confirmed what you found. The Tamron is as good at f/2.8 as the Canon is at f/4 (except at the corners) and significantly the Tamron was 1/3 to 1/2 stop faster. Loosing the 105mm end was my greatest concern but as you found, it is possible to crop your way to 105mm with the Tamron and still come out ahead. Thanks for a great channel.
+Michael Parker To get the 100mm get back go for the 100mm F/2 prime. It's about 500 dollars, it's extremely sharp. It's sharper than 100mm F 2.8 L series prime. It is an amazing lens. Shoot the portraits with that. 24-70 for everything else.
+Michael Parker you can try the 70mm end f2.8 at tamron, it is very soft (especially the corner) compare to canon 24-105. i think Tony got a bad copy of 24-105. this lens is very sharp wide open at any zoom range. tamron 24-70 is also very weak, can be destroyed by one drop. but canon can survive.
I must say that I've been using my Canon 24-105 (purchased in 2013) for many months and have *never* seen CA anything like that seen in your video! It's a super fantastic lens. Great video and good testing though, and will certainly be looking more closely at Tamrons from now on.
Well, I designed the testing environment specifically to create CA by adding heavy backlighting. In low contrast situations, you'd never notice it, but if you work on sunny days, you'll see it frequently. I wanted to test it because it's one of those factors that separates great lenses like the Tamron from lenses that are only "very good", like the Canon. Even if it does come up in a real shot, it's not a huge deal to fix... it's just a bit of a pain.
Hey guys I wanted to let you know this was a good video. What I like best about all of your videos is you talk about what is going to happen, then you show it happening and at the end you bring it all together. In all you make it short and to the point which for those watching is good but yet educational. To you both I say thank you for your energy and the knowledge you pass on. Great job.
Great work on all your vids guys, my wife and I are fairly new to photography and we always enjoy your efforts as well as find them informative and helpful, keep up the awesome videos, thank you Chelsea and Tony
THANKS for the GREAT review! Especially for the crop comparison of Tamron at 70 and Canon at 105! EVERYBODY should make these comparisons when comparing lenses.. I.e. 90% of my photos are cropped for making a better composition. Once again big THANKS! And PLEASE do more lens comparison in future! Big Fan
I have the Canon 24-105 f/4 and I love it. I never even looked at the Tamron 24-70 f/2.8. One thing I hate about the 24-105 is lens creep. O ya and I payed $1050 for it......
Did you buy it at a retail store like best buy or something like it? i know best buy sells it for about $1200. I had it and just sold it for 650 because on my t4i it was terrible and yeah the lens does creep, despite what some of the reviews said.
Hey Guys, Thank you for the excellent review! I own the 24-105 Canon f4 L that is shown in this review. I am a working pro and depend on this as my go to event lens. I am sorry for the long post, but if you are considering this lens, I think that it is important that you all know this!!! Many people have had the 01 issue, broken ribbon cables inside the lens, etc... Well, what a nightmare this lens turned out to be. Started getting the 01 error during an event. Had to go to my Canon 16-35mm f2.8 L workhorse to finish the event and crop in to make the shots right. Long story short, the stabilization unit had to be be replaced at a cost of about 60% of the value of the lens at that point in time. I had Canon Pro Services do the repair (I am a CPS member). All seemed well until the very next event, another once in a lifetime affair. The lens started acting strange, focus wise, in the middle of the event. Another long story short, an incompetent Canon tech did not tighten the front element screws properly and many important shots were compromised because the front of the lens was literally about to fall off and I did not realize this in the darkness of the event venue!!! The effect was akin to an unintentional Lens Baby effect, but on groups of people! I sent the lens back and they re-assembled the loose parts at no additional charge, but this did not bring back the compromised images!!! Next chapter, the AF/Manual selector switch started acting up. Not switching with a distinctive click, but instead spongy. I thought that they would just be able to clean it. NOPE, a $250 repair estimate after I explained all of the above to them in writing, twice. I told them to forget it, I would just live with it, which I did until I started noticing that when I turned the camera for a vertical shot, the focus would be significantly off in the upper half of the frame. No doubt it's the d*mn stabilizer unit again or loose elements! No, way, I am done! My confidence has been shaken with using this lens. I have been renting the mark II version of this lens until I make a purchase decision. It will not be a Canon lens though! So I am very much looking into this Tamron model and thank you again for this review. I think that I am going to purchase the Tamron because of the quality of the optics, the stabilization unit and that I am used to shooting at F4 anyway due to owning this crappy Canon lens. Bottom line, Canon not take care of me! BTW, The Canon facility that I used was the NEWPORT NEWS, VIRGINIA location.
I have both of these lenses, starting with the Canon. I always hated the Canon 24-105L but never could put my finger on why. I assumed it was the smaller aperture. I got the Tamron for Christmas and I love it. When I need longer than 70 I pull out the 70-200L. The Tamron does have a bit of distortion at the edges when wide and some situations seem to exacerbate the vignette effect when wide open but neither is bad, just annoying.
Lenses are normally sharper when stopped down a bit, so it isn't really a fair comparison. I wonder how they would compare at f/5.6. Also, have you compared the Tamron to the Canon 24-70 f/2.8?
Thank you so much for your review. I just bought a Canon 6D with the 24-105. After seeing your review I went back to the store and changed it for the Tamron. Thanks again !
Great video comparison Tony. By the way your sister is beautiful and it's nice to see brother and sister working together in something they both enjoy.
I'm in the market for one of these..thing is, the newer version of the 24-105 should knock the price down on this one, plus plenty on the used market in a couple of months. Tamron, sharper, but the trusty Canon is more durable and (soon to be) much cheaper.
Very good review Tony and Chelsea; I own both lenses, and I agree with all your points, the best part for me is the f2.8 and the IS. The Tammy is a little heavy but it doesn't bother me. I like the extra reach of the 24/105, but am getting used to the Tammy and I haven't had the Canon on my body since I got the Tammy.
tamron 24-70mm f2.8 vc or Nikon 24-70 f2.8 ?? which one would you suggest for fashion ,street fashion and beauty .currently I am using Nikon d300s and going to buy Nikon d810 .please help me out .i am really confused. one more thing i would like to say ,for me you are the best and genuine guy to review any product from photographic industry.
I have the Tamron on a D700 and it has been basically flawless. I must say durability has been fantastic aside from having to tape the lens hood in place. I’ve been sprayed with mud and water with that set and I’ve bounced it off of asphalt and rock cliff faces a number of times accidentally and it still keeps ticking. If money is ever on the line for a photo the 700 and that Tamron are the first rig I reach for.
Thanks for the review, Tony!!! I have made my choice at the very beginning (when Tamron release it) and the Tamron is my preferred option. 50% of the time is on my main dslr(full-frame), great event/wedding lens, biggest plus in the completion is the VC (vibration compensation) which works superbly and helps in low light(slow speed) and hand held video.
Tony thanks for the review I really you and Chelsea taking your precious time out to make this informative video. I was on the fence with this glass. I'm using the 24-105mm now (meh) but I'm ditching it and going for the Tamron 24-70mm. Canon seriously needs an update that lens. Thanks again.
Any results with the Canon stopped down? You're comparing one lens wide open, to another stopped down. I'd love to see results compared at various apertures.
Do a "walk around lens shootout" for APS-C PLZ! I am curious how the EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM compares to others! I have this lens but I think its lacking a little for the price.
Loved this review Tony! I had this dilemma due to tight budget, and your review really helped me made my decision to go with Tamron. Thank you so much!
The Tamron 24-70 2.8 is the best choice if you can't afford the Canon 24-70 Mk2 variant. However it has some issues and it's not inconsistent focussing. Focus consistency is very good anno 2017. They probably have improved it over the years. Sample variation has also become less of an issue. A year after release about 50% of the consumer reviews were bad because of problems. Today it's less than 10% (don't remember the exact number). But to get the most out of it you have to rely on AFMA (Auto Focus Micro Adjustment). I've tried two samples and they both needed some serious adjustment on the wide AND tele side in opposite directions on my Canon 6D. When you have that dialed in it will front focus just a little on subjects really close by. But when you know it, you can compensate. Another issue is that the vibration control (image stabilisation) takes some time to start up. If you press the shutter release out of the blue, VC will make your image blurrier with a zig-zag pattern. If you press it half, wait for half a second and then take the picture it works very good. But this is also something you have to know in advance.
I went to your link at the end of the video and the Tamron is $145 higher than the price you displayed on the video - I know it's rare for equipment to go UP in price (Jan 17, still holiday prices?) Probably want to avoid posting prices in the future. That being said, this video was very helpful in helping me narrow the choices to replace my broken Tamron 28-300. Now, on to the comparison of the Tamron, Sigma, and Canon 70-200s. Then, to print some money ; )
Alright I'm convinced. I just bought a grey market version on Amazon for around $800, prime shipping. Going to probably list the 24-105 f/4L on eBay to offset the cost a little. Next on the list.... a 70-200 f/2.8 with I.S.
A most interesting review - thank you. Since going digital several years ago with a Canon 20D I have almost always used Canon glass (including the 24-105), my only none Canon lens was a Sigma - guess what its the ONLY lens that went faulty ! Please review the 24- 105/ 24- 70 F4 & F2.8 MK 2. Thanks again.
Hey Tony, I'm finally going to upgrade my xsi to a 6D. I was considering on picking up the kit 24-105mm, but after watching your video I'm thinking otherwise. I already own a Tamron 28-75/f2.8 (non VC) and very happy with it. Do you think the 24-105 is worth the added 30mm and IS?
Interesting video, I bought a Tamron 24-70 F2.8 VC to replace both my 24-105 F4L & Tamron 28-75 F2.8, owned it for a day when I realised that the 24-70 was NOT as good IQ wise as the Canon 24-105 F4L and so I sold it on, Tamron, whilst making some good lenses obviously still have VERY POOR quality control based on my experience with numerous lenses of a number of years....
Great reveiw. Would you pair the tamron with the latest canon 7d mkll or would you go with the canon 15-85 ? Or would you choose something else in this price range?
Keep in mind the 24-105 is handicapped here because it is wide open. Would of been interesting and more comparative to see some tests at f8 or f11. That said, I own the Tamron and love it.
Great review guys. I think it's really helped me make my decision. I would say though, I think it was a little unfair on the Tamron in regards to the build quality... it's heavier because it's f 2.8, and you did kind of drop it!
Very interesting video indeed. However, canon sell this lens as a kit lens with the 5d... And works exceptionally well but like all lens, with its limitations. There must be a marketing ploy here then. Ironically, I bought the 24-105L and have had excellent outdoor results. This lens is an f4 and to my mind the Tamron is as you demonstrate in its own catagory just as the canon lens is. When I want results similar to your Tamron, I go to my Sigma 17-50 f/2.8 which what your Tamron does. Or even my new Sigma f1.4 Art lens which puts many L lens in the shade... My canon L lens works a dream even though I have heard some issues with this lens. But then warranty can solve this problem. Like all lens, nothing is perfect. Your video deals with that perfectly. Look forward to more stuff from both of you! Example, concert shooting with prime lens! That should get you thinking...
Tony what are your thoughts on the 24-70 Tamron in comparison to the 70-200 2.8 Tamron? (I have the later and cant describe how PRO and fast it feels in every way.)
Tony, I love your videos as always, I have the canon 70D, how does this compare from the full frame camera to the compact I have, do most of the details in this video still apply? Thanks! Brandon S-Colorado
hey thanks so much for your great and very informative tutorials and reviews! For someone from Europe/Germany it is great that you speak so clear and understandable. I'm a let's say beginner and learn a lot from your work here. There are lots of other tutorials but you seem to give some really essential informations. I bought the canon kit objektiv together with the 6 D full frame and more or less the fotos are just not sharp. I brought it twice for adjustment (or how you call that?) and after that it was still not sharp. then I sent it to canon germany and they changed one lens group and the autofokus system and now it is still not sharp. I talked to so many people- also the staff from the stores- and every one just said it's a great lens...so it was really very very interesting for me what you said about this 'great L lens...' and how you see the quality of that lens in fact. your samples are completely great to understand for everyone! thank you guys :)
problems here: 1). sample variation. One 24-105 may not be as sharp as another. you need to increase the sample size and average. 2). you cant compare the tamron stopped down to the canon wide open. lenses are sharper when they are stopped down. shooting the canon at 5.6 would have been a more fair comparison, or shooting the tamron wide open.
stoplossM4 1) We actually own two 24-105s, and you can also check DxOMark's P-Mpix ratings for the lens if you want another opinion (shortcut: they agree with me). 2) I certainly can compare the Tamron stopped down. How would it be ok to compare it wide open, gathering twice as much light and shooting at a lower ISO? Clearly that would be better in other ways.
I completely agree that keeping the 24-105 at its maximum aperture affected the fairness of this comparison. The performance of the Canon at 5.6 and up completely blows the Tamron out of the water.
I think I got a lemon with my Tamron 24-70. Shots were blurry at 1/60. My lens didn't get sharp till f7 and it still wasn't anything great. Might try another copy, but I'm a bit more cautious now.
How do you think the Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 would compare to the Canon 24-70 f/2.8 ? My Canon 24-70 is my work horse and I find it to be an amazing lens. I would love to see a comparison of them.
What about the Sigma 24-105, that lens seems like a winner. Would be great to see a three way comparison between the lenses reviewed here and the new Sigma lens. I own the 24-105 (two in fact), but recently i have had a crazing for something sharper, and its down to a choice - get a few primes, or a new standard zoom. Review and any info would be GREATLY appreciated. Keep up the good work!
Hi there.. This is very good comparison you have done... Thanks for that.. Want to know which camera is used to shot this video... It's quite good.. Please let me know the camera model n make... Cheers
My 24-105 has never disappointed me. Super sharp and will be with me for a very long time. The problem with Tamron or other 3rd party lenses are you cant use in camera CA control and stuff. But If i sigma ever (fingers crossed) makes a 24-70 I would not hesitate one minute to go pre-order one :)
I tested 4 Tamron lenses in Thailand against the 24-105 Canon and found there to be a soft area(almost a double image) on all 4 at 24mm. but sharper in the centre, which is not acceptable. Might have been a bad batch, shame I really wanted it to work for me, Tony love your video's
I do appreciate this review. However, I do question why the test pictures all are done at 70mm, which is a bad focal length for the Canon. My experience is that the Canon is good at 24, best at 35-50 and that 70-105 are the worst. Further, I would appreciate a comparison of pictures from other apertures, such as f/5,6 and f/8. All that said, the things you do compare, you do very well indeed. Thank you!
I did test other focal lengths and apertures but didn't find any surprises--the Tamron was consistently sharper. It's just a far better lens, optically.
Thanks for the great review. A quick question a bit off topic; I noticed you were filming in cold weather, what would you suggest is the coldest one should be out filming with dslrs? Also, how long of a period of time ? Thanks for any suggestions :)
I don't know what the coldest weather would be, but I've been out well below zero and the only problem I have is that the batteries die very quickly. I carry extra batteries and keep them close to my body (and thus warmer), and swap them out on a regular basis. After warming a battery back up, they tend to come back to life for a bit.
I think if I had borrowed an expensive lens for an assessment and then have to send it back in 2 pieces I would be inclined to say nice things about it? I have the Cannon 24/105 and it's a great allround lens but if I want super sharpness and a fast lens I would look to my primes.
I'm buying my first DSLR camera and I'm leaning toward the Nikon D3300. I love your reviews!!!! I love how compact the Nikon is, but I understand that I will need a better lens. I mainly use my camera for indoor shots of my triplets like at concerts, recitals, etc. Most of the time there is very low light and pics come out blurry. Considering the Tamron lens. What lens would you suggest for my Nikon and for how I want to use it?
Thanks so much Tony! Will I need a longer zoom like the Sigma 18-200 f/3.5 to capture the kids when they are on the stage? Your reviews are the greatest!!!!
Tony Northrup Isn't the Sigma a bit large for a standard zoom? Are there any others in this range that you could recommend, that are maybe a tad smaller? Cheers
Hi Tony. In the video you say you could crop the Tamron files to match the Canon at a 105mm because it's so sharp. But what about background blur (DOF)? 105mm at F4 would give a better background blur then the same picture shot with a 70mm at 2.8 right? I'm tempted to get the Tamron (I do a lot of indoor event and portraiture work), But I can't aford both. I do have the 70-200 F2.8 but I don't want to switch lenses all the time.
I have recently upgraded from canon 24 104 to tamron 24 70 and it cracked by just dropping it from 1feet hight on a hard floor. It is build quality is huge and bulky but with poor plastic. Though the lens is lot sharper than canon 24 105
Hello Sir , My Self Nalin Bhatt, from INDIA, Thanks for Sharing the knowledge, Sir how you preserve your cameras and lences , i mean to say what you do to avoid fungus in the lences.
Tony, it looked cold where you were, did you guys still use your lenses without a protective filter even with snow in the air? I have taken your advice regarding filters and still getting used to the idea of not using one!
Rui He We could, though they're rather apples to oranges. The Tamron is a stop faster, so it's better for action, such as weddings and events. The Sigma is more versatile, so it's better for things like travel and vacation. At the long end, the Sigma can even make a decent portrait. They're both very sharp.
This was a test to find the best walking around lenses, and the Canon 24-70 lacks image stabilization, which (for me, anyway) eliminates it as a contender for a walking around lens.
I have the Tamron 24-70 2.8 and i dropped it from my waist height. It had a UV filter on and beside a little dent on the filter and the hood, everything else works great! I'm sure my ego hurts more than the lens did...
Tony, Very helpful review, thank you. I'm considering buying a Nikon d750 with either this tamron 24 70 2.8 or the Sigma 24 105 f4. I would be using the setup for travel and casual shooting. Which would you recommend for my first full frame lens? Or would the nikon 24 120 f4 be just fine? Thanks
Jordan Wallace We chose the Sigma 24-105 f4 (sdp.io/s105) over the Tamron for general shooting. The extra range helps more than the extra stop, and you can get better background blur at 105 f4 than you can at 70mm f2.8. Enjoy!
Hi Tony, i love your videos. Always honest and precise and I've learned allot from you. I have one question, I have a 70D looking to upgrade to a lens optically better with a fixed aperture than my 18-135 stm lens. How in terms of sharpness would you say the Tamron 24-70 VC is in comparison? I have a wedding and lots of events that are coming up to shoot for. Would the Tamron be my best option? Also looking at the Sigma 18-50. Your thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks.
I wouldn't recommend the Tamron 24-70 for the 70D; it's a full-frame lens. Instead, look at the Sigma 18-35 f/1.8 (amzn.to/14bTUMS), which is the best zoom in the world for APS-C cameras, IMO. Also look at the Canon EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 (amzn.to/PUvWEf). More info in my Photography Buying Guide (links in the description).
Seeing as the canon is an old workhorse and could be prone to a little play, have you confirmed the AF micro adjustment of the lens is calibrated with the camera?
I too am looking for a 24-70 full frame lense... where quality and durability are essential. I'd rather deal with an adapter to E mount if needs be than be comprimised for trying to maintain brand loyalty. any updates on the best suggestion with today's options? ( sorry, the buying guide its the next in the series to buy on my list. sdp and the lr are betting digested currently)
this review is really late in the making, but still enjoyed listening to it, but the new Sigma 24/105 f4 with IS, from what I have heard is as sharp as the Canon 24/70 f2.8 ll, and has great contrast, so that is a lens I would like to see compared to the Tamron 24/70 f2.8 VC at f4, not a Canon lens that has been out for like a hundred years, Canon really screwed up not putting IS on the new 24/70 ll, and then pricing it double of the Tamron with IS, they lost allot of sales to Tamron, but personally I am really hoping Sigma is about to come out with a new 24/70 f2.8 IS, because I know it will have amazing image quality at a fair price, unlike Canon who over prices everything
Im torn between choosing this tamron lense or sigma 24-105 art lense. Lense would be my general walking around lense and occasional wedding/birthday lense combined with my 50 and 35 primes. Which one would be the better option combined with canon 6D?
+Juha Nyman We prefer the Sigma 24-105 f4. The ability to reach to 105 is really powerful, and even allows for impromptu headshots with better background blur than you could get with a 24-70 f2.8.
⭐ Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 on Amazon help.tc/t70
⭐ Canon 24-105 f/4 on Amazon help.tc/c105
was looking at the tamron 24-70 2.8 for the video, but ended up buying the canon 24-70 2.8 II and man it's the best lens I've ever used.
A tip for anyone watching this video: watch it in 1080p. In low quality the differences between the 2 lenses are not very clearly, but in 1080p the comparison is incredibly clear and useful. Thanks Tony and Chelsea for the comparison!
So I just sold my 24-105 which was virtually glued to my 5DII for years, and replaced it with the Tamron 24-70. Then, wondering if I made the right decision, found your great comparison review. (I love having my opinion confirmed by experts) I had both lenses briefly and my quick testing confirmed what you found. The Tamron is as good at f/2.8 as the Canon is at f/4 (except at the corners) and significantly the Tamron was 1/3 to 1/2 stop faster. Loosing the 105mm end was my greatest concern but as you found, it is possible to crop your way to 105mm with the Tamron and still come out ahead. Thanks for a great channel.
+Michael Parker To get the 100mm get back go for the 100mm F/2 prime. It's about 500 dollars, it's extremely sharp. It's sharper than 100mm F 2.8 L series prime. It is an amazing lens. Shoot the portraits with that. 24-70 for everything else.
+Michael Parker
you can try the 70mm end f2.8 at tamron, it is very soft (especially the corner) compare to canon 24-105. i think Tony got a bad copy of 24-105. this lens is very sharp wide open at any zoom range. tamron 24-70 is also very weak, can be destroyed by one drop. but canon can survive.
I must say that I've been using my Canon 24-105 (purchased in 2013) for many months and have *never* seen CA anything like that seen in your video! It's a super fantastic lens. Great video and good testing though, and will certainly be looking more closely at Tamrons from now on.
Well, I designed the testing environment specifically to create CA by adding heavy backlighting. In low contrast situations, you'd never notice it, but if you work on sunny days, you'll see it frequently. I wanted to test it because it's one of those factors that separates great lenses like the Tamron from lenses that are only "very good", like the Canon.
Even if it does come up in a real shot, it's not a huge deal to fix... it's just a bit of a pain.
ha! Good ol' mystic village. I'm over in Warwick RI. It was awesome seeing you guys so close. Nice review.
Hey guys I wanted to let you know this was a good video. What I like best about all of your videos is you talk about what is going to happen, then you show it happening and at the end you bring it all together. In all you make it short and to the point which for those watching is good but yet educational. To you both I say thank you for your energy and the knowledge you pass on. Great job.
Great work on all your vids guys, my wife and I are fairly new to photography and we always enjoy your efforts as well as find them informative and helpful, keep up the awesome videos, thank you Chelsea and Tony
THANKS for the GREAT review!
Especially for the crop comparison of Tamron at 70 and Canon at 105!
EVERYBODY should make these comparisons when comparing lenses..
I.e. 90% of my photos are cropped for making a better composition.
Once again big THANKS! And PLEASE do more lens comparison in future!
Big Fan
I have the Canon 24-105 f/4 and I love it. I never even looked at the Tamron 24-70 f/2.8. One thing I hate about the 24-105 is lens creep. O ya and I payed $1050 for it......
Did you buy it at a retail store like best buy or something like it? i know best buy sells it for about $1200. I had it and just sold it for 650 because on my t4i it was terrible and yeah the lens does creep, despite what some of the reviews said.
Hey Guys, Thank you for the excellent review!
I own the 24-105 Canon f4 L that is shown in this review. I am a working pro and depend on this as my go to event lens.
I am sorry for the long post, but if you are considering this lens, I think that it is important that you all know this!!! Many people have had the 01 issue, broken ribbon cables inside the lens, etc...
Well, what a nightmare this lens turned out to be. Started getting the 01 error during an event. Had to go to my Canon 16-35mm f2.8 L workhorse to finish the event and crop in to make the shots right.
Long story short, the stabilization unit had to be be replaced at a cost of about 60% of the value of the lens at that point in time. I had Canon Pro Services do the repair (I am a CPS member). All seemed well until the very next event, another once in a lifetime affair. The lens started acting strange, focus wise, in the middle of the event. Another long story short, an incompetent Canon tech did not tighten the front element screws properly and many important shots were compromised because the front of the lens was literally about to fall off and I did not realize this in the darkness of the event venue!!! The effect was akin to an unintentional Lens Baby effect, but on groups of people!
I sent the lens back and they re-assembled the loose parts at no additional charge, but this did not bring back the compromised images!!!
Next chapter, the AF/Manual selector switch started acting up. Not switching with a distinctive click, but instead spongy. I thought that they would just be able to clean it. NOPE, a $250 repair estimate after I explained all of the above to them in writing, twice. I told them to forget it, I would just live with it, which I did until I started noticing that when I turned the camera for a vertical shot, the focus would be significantly off in the upper half of the frame. No doubt it's the d*mn stabilizer unit again or loose elements! No, way, I am done! My confidence has been shaken with using this lens. I have been renting the mark II version of this lens until I make a purchase decision. It will not be a Canon lens though!
So I am very much looking into this Tamron model and thank you again for this review. I think that I am going to purchase the Tamron because of the quality of the optics, the stabilization unit and that I am used to shooting at F4 anyway due to owning this crappy Canon lens.
Bottom line, Canon not take care of me!
BTW, The Canon facility that I used was the NEWPORT NEWS, VIRGINIA location.
The Tamron lens is on my radar. Thanks for this, Tony and Chelsea.
I have both of these lenses, starting with the Canon. I always hated the Canon 24-105L but never could put my finger on why. I assumed it was the smaller aperture. I got the Tamron for Christmas and I love it. When I need longer than 70 I pull out the 70-200L. The Tamron does have a bit of distortion at the edges when wide and some situations seem to exacerbate the vignette effect when wide open but neither is bad, just annoying.
When I'm looking for an opinion I trust your one of the few on the Internet I truly trust and enjoy . Thank you
Lenses are normally sharper when stopped down a bit, so it isn't really a fair comparison. I wonder how they would compare at f/5.6. Also, have you compared the Tamron to the Canon 24-70 f/2.8?
Been using the Tamron for about 2 years now, and have no regrets as yet. Considering the cost and image quality, its a winner for me over.
Enjoyed this post. I swapped my Canon for the Tamron in Sept . Your findings confirm my choice
Thank you so much for your review. I just bought a Canon 6D with the 24-105. After seeing your review I went back to the store and changed it for the Tamron. Thanks again !
I'm a little confused why you matched the Tamron vs the 24-105, rather than the Canon 24-70
The lenses are within the same price range.
And Canon 24-70 doesn’t have IS
Hey Tony and Chelsea. How does the Sigma 24-105 f/4 compare to the Tamron 24-70 2.8 in regards to AF speed and image quality? Thanks.
Tony, Can you do a review of the Canon 24-70mm F2.8 LII, and compare it with the Tamron please
I'd like to see that one too.
That would be more of a comparison
Great video comparison Tony. By the way your sister is beautiful and it's nice to see brother and sister working together in something they both enjoy.
I'm in the market for one of these..thing is, the newer version of the 24-105 should knock the price down on this one, plus plenty on the used market in a couple of months. Tamron, sharper, but the trusty Canon is more durable and (soon to be) much cheaper.
Very good review Tony and Chelsea; I own both lenses, and I agree with all your points, the best part for me is the f2.8 and the IS. The Tammy is a little heavy but it doesn't bother me. I like the extra reach of the 24/105, but am getting used to the Tammy and I haven't had the Canon on my body since I got the Tammy.
Rather have a 24-70 f2.8L Canon used for the same price of that Tamron.
Hey guys, great video,how does the Tamron compare to the Canon 24-70 f/2.8?
Similar image quality, but the Canon is much sturdier. The Tamron has VC/IS, however, which is a requirement for me (for my "walking around" lens).
tamron 24-70mm f2.8 vc or Nikon 24-70 f2.8 ?? which one would you suggest for fashion ,street fashion and beauty .currently I am using Nikon d300s and going to buy Nikon d810 .please help me out .i am really confused. one more thing i would like to say ,for me you are the best and genuine guy to review any product from photographic industry.
For the average Joe, the Canon 24-105 f4L is a great lens, I try to stay away for third party lens and I only buy L lens for my 5D MK3
I have the Tamron on a D700 and it has been basically flawless. I must say durability has been fantastic aside from having to tape the lens hood in place. I’ve been sprayed with mud and water with that set and I’ve bounced it off of asphalt and rock cliff faces a number of times accidentally and it still keeps ticking. If money is ever on the line for a photo the 700 and that Tamron are the first rig I reach for.
Thanks for the review, Tony!!! I have made my choice at the very beginning (when Tamron release it) and the Tamron is my preferred option. 50% of the time is on my main dslr(full-frame), great event/wedding lens, biggest plus in the completion is the VC (vibration compensation) which works superbly and helps in low light(slow speed) and hand held video.
Tony thanks for the review I really you and Chelsea taking your precious time out to make this informative video. I was on the fence with this glass. I'm using the 24-105mm now (meh) but I'm ditching it and going for the Tamron 24-70mm. Canon seriously needs an update that lens. Thanks again.
Any results with the Canon stopped down? You're comparing one lens wide open, to another stopped down. I'd love to see results compared at various apertures.
24 70 f4L is even worse than 24 105 f4L
superb review...builds up my spirit to go with the tamron glass...thanks tony and chelsea...
I would of like to see a comparison at f5.6
Another great video! I love Tamron! The IQ has improved so much over the years.
I own the Tamron 24-70 and it is on my 5D3 and so far I love it. Sharp, VC is amazing able to shoot at like 1/20 shutter speeds with a use able image.
Do a "walk around lens shootout" for APS-C PLZ! I am curious how the EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM compares to others! I have this lens but I think its lacking a little for the price.
How different would a lens like the Tamron react between a model like the Canon T3 and one like your Canon 5D Mark III. Awesome review by the way
Loved this review Tony! I had this dilemma due to tight budget, and your review really helped me made my decision to go with Tamron. Thank you so much!
The Tamron 24-70 2.8 is the best choice if you can't afford the Canon 24-70 Mk2 variant. However it has some issues and it's not inconsistent focussing. Focus consistency is very good anno 2017. They probably have improved it over the years. Sample variation has also become less of an issue. A year after release about 50% of the consumer reviews were bad because of problems. Today it's less than 10% (don't remember the exact number). But to get the most out of it you have to rely on AFMA (Auto Focus Micro Adjustment). I've tried two samples and they both needed some serious adjustment on the wide AND tele side in opposite directions on my Canon 6D. When you have that dialed in it will front focus just a little on subjects really close by. But when you know it, you can compensate. Another issue is that the vibration control (image stabilisation) takes some time to start up. If you press the shutter release out of the blue, VC will make your image blurrier with a zig-zag pattern. If you press it half, wait for half a second and then take the picture it works very good. But this is also something you have to know in advance.
I have the Tamron for Nikon and I'm very happy with it
I went to your link at the end of the video and the Tamron is $145 higher than the price you displayed on the video - I know it's rare for equipment to go UP in price (Jan 17, still holiday prices?) Probably want to avoid posting prices in the future.
That being said, this video was very helpful in helping me narrow the choices to replace my broken Tamron 28-300. Now, on to the comparison of the Tamron, Sigma, and Canon 70-200s. Then, to print some money ; )
would love to see a review of the Canon 24-70 f/4
Alright I'm convinced. I just bought a grey market version on Amazon for around $800, prime shipping. Going to probably list the 24-105 f/4L on eBay to offset the cost a little. Next on the list.... a 70-200 f/2.8 with I.S.
Hi. Would you still recommend the Tamron for 2018?
Dang it, now I want this lens for my 6D.
Hey Tony, have you reviewed the Canon 85mm 1.2 and compare to the alternatives with your technical genius skills?
A most interesting review - thank you. Since going digital several years ago with a Canon 20D I have almost always used Canon glass (including the 24-105), my only none Canon lens was a Sigma - guess what its the ONLY lens that went faulty ! Please review the 24- 105/ 24- 70 F4 & F2.8 MK 2. Thanks again.
Please see my horror story about owning the Canon 24-105 lens reviewed in the video, before you buy.
Hey Tony, I'm finally going to upgrade my xsi to a 6D. I was considering on picking up the kit 24-105mm, but after watching your video I'm thinking otherwise. I already own a Tamron 28-75/f2.8 (non VC) and very happy with it. Do you think the 24-105 is worth the added 30mm and IS?
Do this exactly review using the Sony 24-70 gym and the new zoom 24-105,... please :)
Interesting video, I bought a Tamron 24-70 F2.8 VC to replace both my 24-105 F4L & Tamron 28-75 F2.8, owned it for a day when I realised that the 24-70 was NOT as good IQ wise as the Canon 24-105 F4L and so I sold it on, Tamron, whilst making some good lenses obviously still have VERY POOR quality control based on my experience with numerous lenses of a number of years....
Great reveiw. Would you pair the tamron with the latest canon 7d mkll or would you go with the canon 15-85 ? Or would you choose something else in this price range?
Great advice about scaling from 70mm to 105mm!
Keep in mind the 24-105 is handicapped here because it is wide open. Would of been interesting and more comparative to see some tests at f8 or f11. That said, I own the Tamron and love it.
Great review guys. I think it's really helped me make my decision. I would say though, I think it was a little unfair on the Tamron in regards to the build quality... it's heavier because it's f 2.8, and you did kind of drop it!
Very interesting video indeed. However, canon sell this lens as a kit lens with the 5d... And works exceptionally well but like all lens, with its limitations.
There must be a marketing ploy here then. Ironically, I bought the 24-105L and have had excellent outdoor results.
This lens is an f4 and to my mind the Tamron is as you demonstrate in its own catagory just as the canon lens is.
When I want results similar to your Tamron, I go to my Sigma 17-50 f/2.8 which what your Tamron does. Or even my new Sigma f1.4 Art lens which puts many L lens in the shade...
My canon L lens works a dream even though I have heard some issues with this lens. But then warranty can solve this problem.
Like all lens, nothing is perfect. Your video deals with that perfectly.
Look forward to more stuff from both of you!
Example, concert shooting with prime lens! That should get you thinking...
Tony what are your thoughts on the 24-70 Tamron in comparison to the 70-200 2.8 Tamron? (I have the later and cant describe how PRO and fast it feels in every way.)
Tony, I love your videos as always, I have the canon 70D, how does this compare from the full frame camera to the compact I have, do most of the details in this video still apply? Thanks! Brandon S-Colorado
hey thanks so much for your great and very informative tutorials and reviews! For someone from Europe/Germany it is great that you speak so clear and understandable. I'm a let's say beginner and learn a lot from your work here.
There are lots of other tutorials but you seem to give some really essential informations. I bought the canon kit objektiv together with the 6 D full frame and more or less the fotos are just not sharp. I brought it twice for adjustment (or how you call that?) and after that it was still not sharp. then I sent it to canon germany and they changed one lens group and the autofokus system and now it is still not sharp. I talked to so many people- also the staff from the stores- and every one just said it's a great lens...so it was really very very interesting for me what you said about this 'great L lens...' and how you see the quality of that lens in fact. your samples are completely great to understand for everyone! thank you guys :)
Which is better the sigma 24-70 f2.8 or the sigma 24-105 f4
problems here: 1). sample variation. One 24-105 may not be as sharp as another. you need to increase the sample size and average. 2). you cant compare the tamron stopped down to the canon wide open. lenses are sharper when they are stopped down. shooting the canon at 5.6 would have been a more fair comparison, or shooting the tamron wide open.
stoplossM4 1) We actually own two 24-105s, and you can also check DxOMark's P-Mpix ratings for the lens if you want another opinion (shortcut: they agree with me).
2) I certainly can compare the Tamron stopped down. How would it be ok to compare it wide open, gathering twice as much light and shooting at a lower ISO? Clearly that would be better in other ways.
I completely agree that keeping the 24-105 at its maximum aperture affected the fairness of this comparison. The performance of the Canon at 5.6 and up completely blows the Tamron out of the water.
Tony & Chelsea Northrup do you recommend the 24-105 these days? I want the 24-70 f4 buuuut I’m poor.
I think I got a lemon with my Tamron 24-70. Shots were blurry at 1/60. My lens didn't get sharp till f7 and it still wasn't anything great. Might try another copy, but I'm a bit more cautious now.
How do you think the Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 would compare to the Canon 24-70 f/2.8 ? My Canon 24-70 is my work horse and I find it to be an amazing lens. I would love to see a comparison of them.
P.S. I know the Canon is expensive, but to me it was worth it. Thanks. I like your videos. Very informative.
What about the Sigma 24-105, that lens seems like a winner. Would be great to see a three way comparison between the lenses reviewed here and the new Sigma lens.
I own the 24-105 (two in fact), but recently i have had a crazing for something sharper, and its down to a choice - get a few primes, or a new standard zoom.
Review and any info would be GREATLY appreciated.
Keep up the good work!
Thanks! I think Sigma is sending us the 24-105 next, so subscribe to see it!
Hi there.. This is very good comparison you have done... Thanks for that.. Want to know which camera is used to shot this video... It's quite good.. Please let me know the camera model n make... Cheers
Avinash Kumar The GH4, I think. Here's a comparison: ruclips.net/video/iZuxo2ZFz_g/видео.html and thanks!
My 24-105 has never disappointed me. Super sharp and will be with me for a very long time. The problem with Tamron or other 3rd party lenses are you cant use in camera CA control and stuff. But If i sigma ever (fingers crossed) makes a 24-70 I would not hesitate one minute to go pre-order one :)
I shoot raw, and let Lightroom automatically handle lens-specific adjustments. It works wonderfully, and supports this Tamron.
I tested 4 Tamron lenses in Thailand against the 24-105 Canon and found there to be a soft area(almost a double image) on all 4 at 24mm. but sharper in the centre, which is not acceptable. Might have been a bad batch, shame I really wanted it to work for me, Tony love your video's
do you think it is fair to compare mark ll & mark lll ? l think if u compare lenses bodies must be same
I do appreciate this review. However, I do question why the test pictures all are done at 70mm, which is a bad focal length for the Canon. My experience is that the Canon is good at 24, best at 35-50 and that 70-105 are the worst.
Further, I would appreciate a comparison of pictures from other apertures, such as f/5,6 and f/8.
All that said, the things you do compare, you do very well indeed. Thank you!
I did test other focal lengths and apertures but didn't find any surprises--the Tamron was consistently sharper. It's just a far better lens, optically.
Dam that looks really cold guys!
Thanks for the great review. A quick question a bit off topic; I noticed you were filming in cold weather, what would you suggest is the coldest one should be out filming with dslrs? Also, how long of a period of time ? Thanks for any suggestions :)
I don't know what the coldest weather would be, but I've been out well below zero and the only problem I have is that the batteries die very quickly. I carry extra batteries and keep them close to my body (and thus warmer), and swap them out on a regular basis. After warming a battery back up, they tend to come back to life for a bit.
I think if I had borrowed an expensive lens for an assessment and then have to send it back in 2 pieces I would be inclined to say nice things about it?
I have the Cannon 24/105 and it's a great allround lens but if I want super sharpness and a fast lens I would look to my primes.
I'm buying my first DSLR camera and I'm leaning toward the Nikon D3300. I love your reviews!!!! I love how compact the Nikon is, but I understand that I will need a better lens. I mainly use my camera for indoor shots of my triplets like at concerts, recitals, etc. Most of the time there is very low light and pics come out blurry. Considering the Tamron lens. What lens would you suggest for my Nikon and for how I want to use it?
For the D3300, I'd recommend the Sigma 18-35: Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art lens review
Thanks so much Tony! Will I need a longer zoom like the Sigma 18-200 f/3.5 to capture the kids when they are on the stage? Your reviews are the greatest!!!!
Tony Northrup Isn't the Sigma a bit large for a standard zoom? Are there any others in this range that you could recommend, that are maybe a tad smaller? Cheers
Hi Tony. In the video you say you could crop the Tamron files to match the Canon at a 105mm because it's so sharp. But what about background blur (DOF)? 105mm at F4 would give a better background blur then the same picture shot with a 70mm at 2.8 right? I'm tempted to get the Tamron (I do a lot of indoor event and portraiture work), But I can't aford both. I do have the 70-200 F2.8 but I don't want to switch lenses all the time.
I have recently upgraded from canon 24 104 to tamron 24 70 and it cracked by just dropping it from 1feet hight on a hard floor. It is build quality is huge and bulky but with poor plastic. Though the lens is lot sharper than canon 24 105
Hello Sir , My Self Nalin Bhatt, from INDIA, Thanks for Sharing the knowledge, Sir how you preserve your cameras and lences , i mean to say what you do to avoid fungus in the lences.
Does the camera make a difference as well? I have a Canon 6D Mark ii but I see you're using a 5D mark iii.
Tony, it looked cold where you were, did you guys still use your lenses without a protective filter even with snow in the air? I have taken your advice regarding filters and still getting used to the idea of not using one!
Yes, definitely. As always, I used hoods--that helped to keep the snow off the lens.
Great review. Would be nice if you can do a review of Tamron 24-70 VS Sigma 24-105, both look great and of great value! Thanks!
Rui He We could, though they're rather apples to oranges. The Tamron is a stop faster, so it's better for action, such as weddings and events. The Sigma is more versatile, so it's better for things like travel and vacation. At the long end, the Sigma can even make a decent portrait. They're both very sharp.
Tony Northrup Thanks, Tony. You guys have the best Youbute camera/lens review. Really appreciate your great work and huge effort!
Sorry if this question was asked before, but why wouldn't u do a test with the Canon 24-70mm seems more of a equal test to me.
This was a test to find the best walking around lenses, and the Canon 24-70 lacks image stabilization, which (for me, anyway) eliminates it as a contender for a walking around lens.
Good stuff. Thanks for sharing.
I have the Tamron 24-70 2.8 and i dropped it from my waist height. It had a UV filter on and beside a little dent on the filter and the hood, everything else works great! I'm sure my ego hurts more than the lens did...
Good to hear! It definitely would have been less damaged if it hadn't had the weight of a camera body attached to it.
Tony,
Very helpful review, thank you. I'm considering buying a Nikon d750 with either this tamron 24 70 2.8 or the Sigma 24 105 f4. I would be using the setup for travel and casual shooting. Which would you recommend for my first full frame lens? Or would the nikon 24 120 f4 be just fine?
Thanks
Jordan Wallace We chose the Sigma 24-105 f4 (sdp.io/s105) over the Tamron for general shooting. The extra range helps more than the extra stop, and you can get better background blur at 105 f4 than you can at 70mm f2.8. Enjoy!
These are the type of lenses I would use for events. For every day "walk around" I would prefer a small 35 or 50.
Hi Tony, i love your videos. Always honest and precise and I've learned allot from you. I have one question, I have a 70D looking to upgrade to a lens optically better with a fixed aperture than my 18-135 stm lens. How in terms of sharpness would you say the Tamron 24-70 VC is in comparison? I have a wedding and lots of events that are coming up to shoot for. Would the Tamron be my best option? Also looking at the Sigma 18-50. Your thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks.
I wouldn't recommend the Tamron 24-70 for the 70D; it's a full-frame lens. Instead, look at the Sigma 18-35 f/1.8 (amzn.to/14bTUMS), which is the best zoom in the world for APS-C cameras, IMO. Also look at the Canon EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 (amzn.to/PUvWEf).
More info in my Photography Buying Guide (links in the description).
Seeing as the canon is an old workhorse and could be prone to a little play, have you confirmed the AF micro adjustment of the lens is calibrated with the camera?
Yes, and I manually focused for the lab tests. The copy I tested is only about a year old.
I'm sorry but why not do a tamron 24-70 vs canons 24-70 not 24-105
quote by Tony "That lens didn't exist when we made this video... but you can always make your own review!"
TheTag300 cause the price is so different
Why you all are bashing the poor Canon 24-105 :(
First slr lounge and now you, poor lens :(
-(im jk'ing obviously)-
How is the Tamron in comparison to the Canon 24-70 F4L?
I too am looking for a 24-70 full frame lense... where quality and durability are essential. I'd rather deal with an adapter to E mount if needs be than be comprimised for trying to maintain brand loyalty. any updates on the best suggestion with today's options? ( sorry, the buying guide its the next in the series to buy on my list. sdp and the lr are betting digested currently)
Brand new Tamron lens split in two is scary. That ought to be a deal breaker. The plastic shell looked paper thin!
I have a t3i and just at a cross roads on what lens to purchase, a canon 24-70 or tamron 24-70... Or the canon 24-105
Nice video! Please make a review on Sigma 24-105mm too!
We've requested it for loan! Hopefully we'll get it in soon.
Tony Northrup Yay!!!
Can you review the Canon 24-70mm F2.8 MK2?
if you love the tamron so much, why don't you just buy your own copy? i'm pretty sure you can easily afford it. great review btw.
Lovely looking town. Wish i was there.
this review is really late in the making, but still enjoyed listening to it, but the new Sigma 24/105 f4 with IS, from what I have heard is as sharp as the Canon 24/70 f2.8 ll, and has great contrast, so that is a lens I would like to see compared to the Tamron 24/70 f2.8 VC at f4, not a Canon lens that has been out for like a hundred years, Canon really screwed up not putting IS on the new 24/70 ll, and then pricing it double of the Tamron with IS, they lost allot of sales to Tamron, but personally I am really hoping Sigma is about to come out with a new 24/70 f2.8 IS, because I know it will have amazing image quality at a fair price, unlike Canon who over prices everything
We've requested the Sigma 24-105 f/4 for review (but haven't yet received it), so a review should be coming soon. Be sure to subscribe!
Great review, thank you for your time for doing this.
***** thanks!
A very detailed review.
What about the difference in background blur of the Tamron @ 70mm f/2.8 vs the Canon @ 105mm f/4?
Im torn between choosing this tamron lense or sigma 24-105 art lense. Lense would be my general walking around lense and occasional wedding/birthday lense combined with my 50 and 35 primes. Which one would be the better option combined with canon 6D?
+Juha Nyman We prefer the Sigma 24-105 f4. The ability to reach to 105 is really powerful, and even allows for impromptu headshots with better background blur than you could get with a 24-70 f2.8.