Canon 24-70 F2.8 II vs. Tamron 24-70 VC Shootout

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 23 дек 2024

Комментарии • 412

  • @TheCameraStoreTV
    @TheCameraStoreTV  12 лет назад +1

    Thanks for checking the video out! This was shot on the Sony Zeiss 24mm F2. Check out our blog on The Camera Store's site to see detailed descriptions of the gear used.
    Jordan @ The Camera Store TV

  • @FishcakeGaming
    @FishcakeGaming 12 лет назад +1

    There is something about these videos that I never notice when watching any other videos on youtube. The same sort of feeling you get when watching a movie...
    What im trying to say is these are incredibly well produced with great "presenters" with great clear and appealing voices and all of that thrown together just makes it feel like a prime time TV show.
    So yeah. well done for that!

  • @TheCameraStoreTV
    @TheCameraStoreTV  11 лет назад

    If you are using the viewfinder, the T4i will always be loud. Shooting in liveview will reduce shutter sound substantially. If you are after a very quiet shutter, check out the Panasonic GH3. It can shoot with a silent electronic shutter.
    Jordan @ The Camera Store TV

  • @TheCameraStoreTV
    @TheCameraStoreTV  12 лет назад +2

    I would actually recommend the Tamron instead. The edge sharpness is the primary selling point of the Canon 24-70 II, and the crop factor of the C100 would make that irrelevant. Also, as mentioned in the video, the Tamron has a stabilizer which will make your handheld work on the C100 much less wobbly.
    Also, you'll save $1000.
    Jordan @ The Camera Store TV

  • @TheCameraStoreTV
    @TheCameraStoreTV  11 лет назад

    We live in a small section of North America often referred to as 'Canada', which defies the Imperial measuring systems, and celebrates the joys of the Metric system!
    Jordan @ The Camera Store TV

  • @TheCameraStoreTV
    @TheCameraStoreTV  12 лет назад

    Absolutely. I'd be very comfortable shooting the Tamron handheld.

  • @briggs9187
    @briggs9187 7 лет назад +2

    I have had the Canon 2.8... and after buying the Tamron 2.8 VC... I was blown by the quality and how far better quality they are now, I am sticking with the Tamron.

  • @patio87
    @patio87 9 лет назад +31

    Nobody shoots landscape at 2.8, if stopped down the corner to corner sharpness improves than it doesn't matter.

    • @PatrickWeygoldt
      @PatrickWeygoldt 8 лет назад +31

      except for nightime landscapes...

    • @JamesZhan
      @JamesZhan 7 лет назад +2

      Not really, you can put the camera on a tripod, keep the aperture small and just keep decreasing the shutter speed ;-)

    • @annoyboyPictures
      @annoyboyPictures 7 лет назад +6

      Errr... No... Even at night you would not want to shoot at 2.8 because your Depth of Field would be so shallow that most of your landscape shot would be out of Focus...

    • @RossMitchellsProfile
      @RossMitchellsProfile 7 лет назад +2

      it depends on the shot, if most of the landscape is far enough away that it is in focus at infinity then it wouldn't really be an issue (if the lens was sharp corner to corner at f/2.8)
      Edit: sorry, just noticed how old your comment is, sorry for comment necromancy

    • @yeahno2291
      @yeahno2291 6 лет назад +5

      These dudes never experience shooting milky way. 😒 Lmao

  • @mrbobo86
    @mrbobo86 10 лет назад +45

    im not rich so... looks like I'm getting the Tamron

  • @alatsahr
    @alatsahr 10 лет назад +25

    Pro tip from Norway: If its cold outside zip up one or two of your jackets :)
    Nice test

    • @sdufg
      @sdufg 4 месяца назад

      LOL

  • @cheatingthesystem21
    @cheatingthesystem21 10 лет назад +23

    I don't think I could spend that much money on a lens without IS or VC. As a Video guy it's pretty much a necessity

    • @jjseandxcefree
      @jjseandxcefree 10 лет назад

      Got no tripod?

    • @cheatingthesystem21
      @cheatingthesystem21 10 лет назад

      Jj Sands how about in a crowd, or anywhere I don't have time or space to setup?

    • @dominicksantora1574
      @dominicksantora1574 10 лет назад +3

      cheatingthesystem21
      This JjSands guy is a jerk and a troll. The fact is, without IS there is no justification in buying this lens. People are not going to buy a lens like this for versatility or general purpose. If that was the case, they would buy the 24-70 F4 L for $999.00. People want a lens like this for the speed. F2.8, to shoot indoors, at night and artistic photography. In which case there are a few different directions you can go without spending as much money. For instance, there are two lenses from Sigma with excellent reviews and are being used by many pros: The Sigma 18-35 1.8 for $799.00 and the 50mm 1.4 art lens for $949.00. You can buy both those lenses and still have money for a case of beer. Of course I'm talking still photography.

    • @jjseandxcefree
      @jjseandxcefree 10 лет назад

      ***** Have you used this lens or are you talking our of your ass like you always do.

    • @dominicksantora1574
      @dominicksantora1574 10 лет назад +4

      Jj Sands
      I see no point carrying on a conversation with a person having an IQ lower than a guppy.

  • @RileyNotRyan
    @RileyNotRyan 12 лет назад

    As a long time customer of The Camera Store I really enjoy these videos.

  • @MarttiSuomivuori
    @MarttiSuomivuori 9 лет назад

    I just sold the 10-year old Canon 24-70 f/2.8 and after serious considerartions ended up with the Tamron which I have been trying now for two days only. The picture quality is very much better than with the old Canon. I can see distortion this way on wide angle and that way on the tele side. Tele, sort of, call it long normal. I see quite remarkable vignetting which surprises me, it is on the long end. Autofocus is accurate, the wide open shots are sharp where you want them to. Then the VC or IS or whatever you want to call it. With the Canon 5DIII the picture quality degrades at high ISO. The extra couple of EVs provided by the stabilizer come in handy here -unless, of course you are shooting moving subjects. This was essentially the reason why I picked the Tamron...the asthma medication I need now makes my hands shake and, well...there is not much else you can do if you want to shoot hand held...

  • @markpianoman
    @markpianoman 11 лет назад

    I have the Tamron 24-70mm lens and love it -- no issues whatsoever. No play between the camera and lens with my 24-70mm…it's absolutely tight and solid on my lowly D7000 body. Can't see paying double the price for a lens that doesn't even have VC! The Tamron 70-200mm lens will be my next lens.

  • @TheCameraStoreTV
    @TheCameraStoreTV  12 лет назад

    I honestly don't think the Canon would be worth the extra money on a crop body. The Tamron is exceptional in the centre 80% of the image. With the Canon you are largely paying for the outstanding edge to edge performance on a full frame.
    Jordan @ The Camera Store TV

  • @78bekem
    @78bekem 11 лет назад +17

    The Canon worths every penny.@07:56 there is a huge difference!

    • @sportagus3
      @sportagus3 10 лет назад

      Erik Wahlstrom If you're going to be printing your images it matters. If it's not sharp, toss it out.

    • @sportagus3
      @sportagus3 10 лет назад

      A decent one? Something larger than your computer screen. Something to display on a wall, to be proud of. I understand what your saying but if you missed the focus and could have hit it you missed the picture. Maybe it's just me but I wouldn't be satisfied with an image knowing it could have been better if it was focused. And I would say sharpness is how true the detail of whatever you're capturing is to the actual thing. That tamron image that was pointed out in the original comment is not focused at all. Even if you scaled it back down the IQ of the canon would be much better. In this specific situation

    • @78bekem
      @78bekem 10 лет назад +1

      sportagus3 Bought the Canon. Thank you

    • @sportagus3
      @sportagus3 10 лет назад +1

      Yes, but if you weren't worried about price, you might as well drop the dime on the canon. That's just my opinion.

    • @sportagus3
      @sportagus3 10 лет назад

      And you can go through the comment feed again to obtain my response to that.

  • @angelisone
    @angelisone 12 лет назад

    Do both of these lenses make noises when shooting videos?
    Like using VC & F stop & focus & zooming during video shots.
    Nice clips to share to the world.

  • @TheCameraStoreTV
    @TheCameraStoreTV  12 лет назад

    This episode was filmed entirely with the Zeiss 24mm F2.
    Jordan @ The Camera Store TV

  • @andrewfishkin6559
    @andrewfishkin6559 Год назад +1

    Great video. What I see here is that the Tamron is an excellent zoom lens, while the Canon is an outstanding bagful of prime lenses without the bag.

  • @TheCameraStoreTV
    @TheCameraStoreTV  12 лет назад

    And the Nikkor Travel Cart you'd need to transport such a lens...
    Jordan @ The Camera Store TV

  • @nuohk
    @nuohk 12 лет назад

    awesome video! when was this video shot? i understand Canada gets cold but down south in Texas we finally dipped below 100 degrees

  • @TheCameraStoreTV
    @TheCameraStoreTV  11 лет назад

    I'd go with the Canon for the faster autofocus and better edge sharpness at F2.8.
    Jordan @ The Camera Store TV

  • @LeksandHooligans
    @LeksandHooligans 10 лет назад +1

    Did you turn the VC off when you where shooting on the tripod?

  • @Declan50
    @Declan50 11 лет назад

    I bought the Tamron earlier this year & never once regretted it. Which is not to say that the Canon is not superb. I'm just totally happy with my choice. Especially considering the VC & the price. In short, Tamron's a great performer!!

  • @GeminiRx6
    @GeminiRx6 12 лет назад

    I would like to see how the Canon compares to the Sony Zeiss 24-70 2.8

  • @shella27we
    @shella27we 12 лет назад

    There are always tests done on full frame vs full frame but, how 'bout full frame vs crop sensore. How much better would the Tamron be in the corners.

  • @GarryBurgess
    @GarryBurgess 6 лет назад

    Wow, I didn't notice at first that this was the first version of the Tamron, which has been improved in the G2 version.

  • @CGphotoOp
    @CGphotoOp 10 лет назад

    Oh you guys have also tested the Carl Zeiss 24-70 for Sony also? No? Thought so.

  • @Danieloncarevic
    @Danieloncarevic 11 лет назад

    What about the old Canon's 24-70 f2.8 VS this new Tamron 24-70 f2.8 VC?

  • @paulpawar1791
    @paulpawar1791 11 лет назад

    Could you guys do a comparison between the Canon 24-70 f2.8 IS ii and the Sony CZ 24-70 f2.8 SSM? Thanks...

  • @dmt99vn
    @dmt99vn 8 лет назад

    7:55 not sure if 2 len focus at the same point.
    Look like the canon focus on the Wall (tack sharp) and Tamron focus on the Car

  • @seancampbell6393
    @seancampbell6393 7 лет назад

    I just got the tamron. So this probably would be a good lens for concert photography?

  • @MDZManny
    @MDZManny 8 лет назад

    when is IS a must have? only for videos? I got the canon 24-70mm F/2.8 ii and I was told no having IS is not a big issue since I can compensate for it, but in what situations is a must have and that I can't do any type of adjustments in aperture or S.S? thanks

  • @TheCameraStoreTV
    @TheCameraStoreTV  12 лет назад

    Dave rocks! Welcome to our channel.

  • @ISawGold
    @ISawGold 11 лет назад

    If the corners clean up at f/4, and no one shoots landscapes at f/2.8, for landscapes at least isn't the corner sharpness not as big a deal?

  • @BPJofficial
    @BPJofficial 11 лет назад

    It's optical image stabilization so it doesn't affect the image quality, although I would turn it off when the camera is on a tripod. Also, as much as I wish Canon would give the 24-70 IS, I doubt it will happen anytime soon.

  • @SaoodHMH
    @SaoodHMH 12 лет назад

    Great review. I hope that I'll be able to see a showdown between A-mount Carl Zeiss 24-70 and the Canon 24-70 lenses.

  • @taylorhoff1351
    @taylorhoff1351 8 лет назад +1

    The shots that were taken at night I feel like the blurriness just looks like motion blur to me.. ive never seen that much blur with tamron

  • @dwaynebaggas2233
    @dwaynebaggas2233 3 года назад

    Hello..someone just corrected that its not vibration control,its "vibration compensation" which of you is telling the right one?

  • @alexandrealmeida4360
    @alexandrealmeida4360 12 лет назад

    Thanks guys for enduring the cold and bring us your opinions.

  • @0147sabb
    @0147sabb 12 лет назад

    One question though. What lens was used to film this? Excellent quality! Thanks

  • @silentsnipe215
    @silentsnipe215 12 лет назад

    What would be a better choice between the tamron 24-70mm VC or the Canon 24-70mm f/4 IS ?

  • @Law2708
    @Law2708 10 лет назад

    Can you say if the lens hoods are interchangeable on each other

  • @urbanlumberjack
    @urbanlumberjack 12 лет назад

    Quickly becoming my favorite photography channel on RUclips.

  • @cdmcrews
    @cdmcrews 11 лет назад

    is there any way to silence the shutter on the T4i. i take a lot of wildlife photos and the noise is crazy loud. if there is no way to silence it then what camera would you recommend that matches or nearly matches the quality of the t4i. thanks for your time

  • @BrianCarey
    @BrianCarey 12 лет назад

    Thanks guys for the review. I got the original Canon 24 - 70 it's a great lens and love it! We've been through a lot! :-)

  • @MakeMyDayVideo
    @MakeMyDayVideo 12 лет назад

    How do you think this version of the Canon 24-70 would fare on the upcoming Canon EOS C100 cinema line camera? A good fit for video shooting? Or? Because I'm not so sure that camera offers or can offer OIS. Thanks!

  • @jadric
    @jadric 12 лет назад

    Hi, How well will the Version 1 Canon compare to the Tamron?

  • @ChrisHelms
    @ChrisHelms 11 лет назад

    Also if you shoot sports, you're probably not going to use a 24-70. You'll be renting a 400 or greater. Or if it's indoor or close outdoor action, at the very least you'll be going for the 70-200 f/2.8, and that's a different lens shootout which I don't believe you've covered yet. Is the Tamron 70-200 f/2.8 VC (newer version) vs the Canon 70-200 f/2.8 IS on the schedule yet?

  • @youat183studio
    @youat183studio 7 лет назад

    Can u do a test a tamron 24-70 VC with Sony 24-70 gmaster? Is there any different?

  • @DZEYCO
    @DZEYCO 12 лет назад

    Why when you test distortion at 24mm , you show only part of the wall or you was close to the wall? while in Tamron test you have bigger amount of bricks.

  • @TheProjectFunHouse
    @TheProjectFunHouse 8 лет назад +4

    I love my Canon glass but I have to go with the Tamron. Not because the image quality is better, but because the price of the Tamron is nicer.

  • @imsyu2
    @imsyu2 11 лет назад +1

    Canon is silly they put an IS with a Macro feature on the same as this one but brought the f/2.8 to f/4 which I don't understand why. one reason was lost weight. Also they put the pinch cap on the f.4 but not on the f/2.8.
    Mr CameraStoreTV can you do a compare of Canon 24-70mm f.2.8 II USM with Canon 24-70mm f/4 IS USM. canon said the f4 can shoot good fast in low lighting they have new lens technology. is it true? or BS? I need to know to buy which for a budge

  • @kolsharif
    @kolsharif 11 лет назад

    man, are you serious ride on the Lada?

  • @martinaee
    @martinaee 12 лет назад

    Tamron lenses are amazing. I've been using a 17-50 on a Nikon D90 for 4-5 years at least and it is amazing. You could say they are "value" lenses but that makes them sound cheap.
    I get pro results and sharpness with the Tamron I'm using everyday. I'll also say Sigma makes amazing stuff. I rented their newest 70-200 recently for a wedding and was blown away by the quality of it.

  • @Sliptone
    @Sliptone 8 лет назад +1

    Hey guys! Nice video!
    Did you had the VC on or off when took the auto focus speed challenge? I think, that this will influence the duration of focusing a lot.

  • @iSOBigD
    @iSOBigD 12 лет назад

    My 70-300mm Tamron lens was a suuuper cheap alternative to a Nikon one, but without image stabilization, it's quite tough to take nice pics at 1/100 shutter speed or less, unless you follow the subject perfectly. Also at F4 you get noticeable chromatic aberration. For a fraction of the Nikon lens, and if you play around its limitations, it's great, but you don't get the ease of use of the higher quality lens.

  • @212lohs
    @212lohs 10 лет назад +1

    Please do more A-Mount comparisons! Would love to see the Sony 24-70mm f/2.8 CZ comparisons w/ the Nikon and Canon counterparts, also w/ Sigma!

    • @MaxwellStarr
      @MaxwellStarr 10 лет назад +1

      Agreed! Very curious how CZ 24-70 compares to it's competitors!

  • @killazx9
    @killazx9 12 лет назад

    For video - are both lenses par focal? (focus pt doesn't shift when zooming)

  • @stevemacdonald9977
    @stevemacdonald9977 9 лет назад

    I've had the Tammy 3 different times over a 3 yr period & could never fall in love with it! It shot sharper with the VC off but still didn't love it, bought the Mark II & not only got rid of the Tammy I no longer needed my 35mm prime any more:)

    • @TheFat_Operator
      @TheFat_Operator 8 лет назад

      Steve MacDonald the 35 prime is still 2 stops faster. i won't be getting rid of mine. you also can't replicate the look with the 24-70 either. ie background blur.

  • @Faymusmedia
    @Faymusmedia 12 лет назад

    You guys are the "DigitalRev" of North America! Totally Awesome!

  • @NeverEndingKarla
    @NeverEndingKarla 7 лет назад

    Does anyone know if the 6D has in camera distortion Correction?

  • @TonyFernandezjkdjedi
    @TonyFernandezjkdjedi 11 лет назад

    I bought the Tamron and found it to be very soft and sold it back on Ebay. The 50 f1.4 I replaced it with is way sharper. Having said that I'd probably buy it again after I pick up a FF camera. The 24-70 on a cropped sensor blows you know what.

  • @dphotos007
    @dphotos007 11 лет назад

    The Canon is my go to lens for most of my work. I shoot it through camera blimps and I need a very quick focusing lens and I need sharpness from corner to corner at 2.8. I traded my old Canon 24-70 lens for the newer one and I am very happy. It is a much better lens than the old version. Not happy about the cost but this is the tool of my trade. Canon really needs to put an IS in this lens. Talked to a Canon rep and he said if IS was installed it would reduce the sharpness.

  • @Shawner666
    @Shawner666 9 лет назад

    what do you think of sigma 70-20 f/2.8 for nikon?

  • @bmfairweather
    @bmfairweather 12 лет назад

    Hey what about the sigma 24-70MM 2.8 vs the canon 24-70MM

  • @chouandsherrie
    @chouandsherrie 12 лет назад

    Got the Tamron for my Nikon again price factor. But the VC was a really nice surprise and useful when you need to stretch that stops. Great vid guys.

  • @lilaznballaz1022
    @lilaznballaz1022 12 лет назад

    can you do canon 24-70 vs canon 24-70ii?

  • @awillingvessel238
    @awillingvessel238 6 лет назад

    is this good for filming for outdoor sports? 24-70mm f4

  • @ronaldoroda403
    @ronaldoroda403 12 лет назад

    6:20 mark, you guys messed up the stereo channels: they are inverted

  • @tedtedsen269
    @tedtedsen269 11 лет назад

    is the tamron way better than the sigmas 24-70mm 2.8 hsm on al f.stops im asking for im gona buy one of them soon

  • @ulpakau3027
    @ulpakau3027 6 лет назад

    Hey, Which Lens and Camera Are you used to shooting for this video.?

  • @mvillar24
    @mvillar24 12 лет назад

    Excellent review.
    I was all set to go with the Tamron because the VC would make it a nice walk around lens, where my hand holding capability will be suffering by the end of a long day.
    But, watching the video, I'm now leaning towards the 24-70. I'll be keeping my 24-105 for walk around duty.
    Edge-sharpness of the Canon might mean I can hold off buying a dedicated landscape prime for a little while longer. The faster AF can also be a big deal.

  • @speecher1959
    @speecher1959 12 лет назад

    I should add that I have the original Canon 24-70mm on my 60d, and LOVE it. It is so consistently sharp and fast - sure not thinking about replacing it any time soon.

  • @tanvir335
    @tanvir335 8 лет назад

    I have budget issues and in my country the Sigma is a lot cheaper than the Tamron.So should I consider taking Sigma or wait for months then buy the Tamron. And also how good is the Sigma in terms of video?

  • @greekcs
    @greekcs 12 лет назад

    I just purchased this lens a few days ago. Pretty nice upgrade from the 24-70 I. I dialed it in using Focal and its tack sharp.

    • @techgeek2994
      @techgeek2994 2 года назад

      so tamron is better than first version of 24-70 f2.8 ?

  • @happysurd
    @happysurd 8 лет назад +1

    I'm not getting sharp images with this lens.. not sure whether that piece i have is not compatible.. any suggestions..

    • @dmt99vn
      @dmt99vn 8 лет назад +1

      +Prakash Yalamarthi check the focus issue either back or front focus

    • @happysurd
      @happysurd 8 лет назад

      How can I check that.. can you pls guide me...

    • @kozz1984
      @kozz1984 8 лет назад +1

      Tamron has terrible quality control. Reading the forms some people have to buy several copies of the lens before getting an acceptable one. I purchased 3 and gave the fuck up. All terrible back focusing or just missing focus.

    • @happysurd
      @happysurd 8 лет назад

      Thanks for the reply.. finally I sold out the lens after a lot of struggle.. I can't think of exchange because my friend bought this for me to Singapore from USA. .. no one mentioned such a thin in any of these reviews :(

    • @kozz1984
      @kozz1984 8 лет назад

      Exactly, I read several reviews with no mention of it either. Take a look at the reviews on Amazon..there are several people complaining about it. Something fishy going on for sure.

  • @kaleb_airgunner
    @kaleb_airgunner 11 лет назад

    Is this lens, 24-70mm, good for landscape aswell?

  • @Daithi182
    @Daithi182 10 лет назад +2

    Would the VC on the Tamron still work if I used it on a Sony a7s? Thanks!

    • @Minupark_KSC
      @Minupark_KSC 10 лет назад +3

      Yes I put this lens on my FS7 with metabones speed booster.

    • @maximdrygin
      @maximdrygin 9 лет назад

      Minwoo Park Hey Minwoo, are you still happy with Tamron 24-70 2.8 VC coupled with FS7? Any problems?

  • @rochat
    @rochat 12 лет назад

    It's all relative. Any lens (even the best primes) at 24mm are going to have some barrel distortion.

  • @thespiritstudio
    @thespiritstudio 9 лет назад

    does the Tamron have internal focus?

  • @TheHornet79
    @TheHornet79 11 лет назад

    I agree. With @britestube I am in the process of buying either the Tamron 24-70m VC or the Canon 24-105mm 4.0 IS. Could you guys do a video on that?

  • @StephenHampton_DesignDesk
    @StephenHampton_DesignDesk 6 лет назад

    I'm confused... Here in South Africa, the Tamron lens is about 15% more expensive than the Canon lens. (R18000 vs R15000 through takealot.com)

  • @halshazly
    @halshazly 12 лет назад

    how does it compare it against Sigma? I was thinking of getting one of those to save some bucks. Any thought?

  • @cjnalam
    @cjnalam 12 лет назад

    how about a review on the tamron 24-70 vs nikon 24-70

  • @witherm01
    @witherm01 12 лет назад

    Informative as always. Is the canon lens the best 24-70 of any 24-70, including non canon lenses?

  • @TheCameraStoreTV
    @TheCameraStoreTV  12 лет назад

    Nope, the Sony FS700 just has incredible dynamic range.
    Jordan @ The Camera Store TV

  • @diamadragonz
    @diamadragonz 11 лет назад

    i had a question ive been using mark 3 for awhile and loving it .. i wanted to purchase a new lens and am confused between three lenses .. the first one is a carl zeiss 25mm f2 which has no chromatic aberration .. and second being the 16-35mm f2.8 II and third being 24-70 f2.8 II am not sure which is the best choice .. i already own a Zeiss 18mm,50mm and 85mm and a canon 70-300 L so which one would you choose out out of the three please let me know thanks

  • @hisham202
    @hisham202 12 лет назад

    just got my dinner ready, and here's 10 minutes of really interesting topic to watch. Thanks :)

  • @ROBOTBOYINITIATIVE
    @ROBOTBOYINITIATIVE 7 лет назад

    Im sold on the Canon in every way except the fact that it doesn't have IS. I shoot both video and photography and I feel that spending all of this money on a lens with no IS will hurt me during video production. I have a range of other lenses however so I would be covered on a video shoot for other options, but i'm worried about seeing the negative effects of no IS on a ridiculously expensive lens. Any suggestions/other alternatives?

  • @Jbzy3000
    @Jbzy3000 12 лет назад

    just jumped from sony to canon and the 7d...need a good wedding lens and I think the tamron is my next purchase thanks for the review

  • @basstheangelo
    @basstheangelo 12 лет назад

    How about Carl Zeiss 24-70mm f/2.8?

  • @dedeyansen
    @dedeyansen 10 лет назад

    hey, i know u've done Sony A7. My question is will the VC work on Tamron 24-70 attached to Sony A7 through LA-EA4 adapter? Can you do a review on this? thx a bunch

  • @rochat
    @rochat 12 лет назад

    It's hard to say. The Canon at 24mm was close to the wall (5.5 bricks across) and the Tamron was further back (10.5 bricks across). They should have mounted them on the same tripod so it would be the exact same image. Only then would we truly see the difference. On a side note, I've heard that this Tamron is at least as good (if not better) than Canon's ver I.

  • @JosHendrikx
    @JosHendrikx 12 лет назад

    Thanks for the review! If you had to choose between the tamron and 24-105, which one would you take? Both about the same price and have vc/is; one is faster, but the other has more range. How would you rate the IQ in the comparable range; big difference?
    Thanks for your thoughts!

  • @riditakhan1106
    @riditakhan1106 9 лет назад

    can i use tamron for nikon d5300?

  • @silentsnipe215
    @silentsnipe215 12 лет назад

    I'm mostly a video guy and wanted to know what would be a better buy the Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 VC or the New Canon 24-70mm f/4L IS. Would that extra 200 bucks be worth the money being its an L glass or would that 2.8 on the Tamron be worth getting over the Canon?

  • @Vall5528
    @Vall5528 12 лет назад

    6:03, how did you audio get flipped?!?

  • @maxfactor4209
    @maxfactor4209 7 лет назад +1

    7:54 tamron image is blur.... u should use another photo for comparison

  • @Daweisstebescheid
    @Daweisstebescheid 12 лет назад

    pleeeease compare the new Tamron 2,8 70-200mm VC with the canon or sigma !