If y’all want somebody to drop chapters on your long form videos. I would love to do that. It may also make some of your longer videos more palatable and useful over time.
Thanks Ryan. We plan on breaking the full length video into chapter segments and posting, but wanted to get the finished flick out first so everyone would have access. You’re spot on, the shorter vids are more palatable and tend to work better for classes and LPDs.
Recommend adding time stamps to the current video. This will facilitate a focus on a specific topic and still maintain the ability to see how it is all connected.
@@usacaddhi 👋 I appreciate the attempt to make it easier to navigate, but I think you misunderstood what they meant in a way that has made your page more cluttered & difficult to navigate. What they meant by chapters is that there is a feature on here where you can add timestamps to a RUclips video with descriptions of what's at the point in the video allowing people to quickly navigate long videos without having to guess where in the video core topics are discussed. If you break it up into multiple videos instead of having to search back & forth in one place you have to jump between entirely separate videos in a playlist which gets really tedious & counterproductive tbh.
@@usacaddplease utilize what @LHfrut said this is gonna be pivotal. If these videos need to be curated for short form content that’s a reflection of the state of the soldiers….
Having read the documents prior to 2012, this seems much more rational in appreciation of indirect fighting. I am also thrilled that we are taking seriously that combat and conflict take forms beyond shooting at each other; the Army needs to understand their place in shaping conflict in our favor regardless of the intensity and resourcing, and this is a great start.
Are we going to keep BCTs as a naming convention after the new 3-0 and Waypoint 2028? The new structure has brought back pure brigades. FA, armor, and infantry. In an organization that loves to say words matter; what story is the Army trying to say still calling brigades “Brigade Combat Teams”. Do we need to have 2 extra words to tell brigades they are to conduct combat and they are a team now that Brigade commanders will not have direct control of EAB assets through all operations ?
The slide depicts the warfighting functions. Mission command would be incorrect as command and control (C2) is the warfighting function. Mission command is the Army's approach to command and control that empowers subordinate decision making and decentralized execution appropriate to the situation. Refer to ADP 6-0, Mission Command (July 2019) for more information on C2 and mission command.
The slide deck is posted to the Central Army Repository (CAR) at: atiam.train.army.mil/catalog/go/100.ATSC/F94902EA-F266-49F7-B592-2D6D41A729C4-1675182085899?page=1
@@corina-rubinibotoc5576 you can access and/or download the entire video at: atiam.train.army.mil/catalog/go/100.ATSC/75C1AA17-7392-40DC-9503-E5DC3BBF1B12-1675177928721?page=1
Most of our publications are written at the unclassified level. There are some that are more strictly controlled, but we've made an effort to make Army doctrine more accessible to the Force. None of the videos we produce deal with sensitive subjects. Likewise with our podcast, Breaking Doctrine, we make sure to do a OPSEC scrub before posting. Finally, Army doctrine is subjective, not directive. We don't tell Commander's specifically how to operate, but give them the tools necessary to make sound decisions, plan and execute successful, doctrinally based operations...and that keeps the threat guessing on what we may do.
They do and it scares the hell out of them which is a deterrent itself. Doctrine is just that…our people, equipment, technology and relentless training takes doctrine to a level that our adversaries cannot anticipate with relative success. Great question!! 🇺🇸
Hey this here is some not Government print office type thing that just messed up by failing the foreign service character of regular business so I want some regular course for just Justice Administration not some complicated version of what somebody assumes teaching defense would be, It is not taught and it is a job so making presentation groups about it was a no go I really meant that for instance work is only done with tags on inside of door is a regular standard maybe one that needs to be put in the beginning of strategic online briefings everyone does not get the same job so bringing everyone to know is difficult and the team is supposed to be able to communicate that the office supports different jobs without all of the work twords clearance overworking it's undermined basic duty determination in more than one case.
RUclips nonsense I’m afraid. Now even “unmonetized” videos can get commercials unless the Uploader goes out of their way to unmonetize them. Even then, it seems like a bit of a crapshoot. Of course, I’m only a third of the way through. If General Beagle up there takes a moment to talk to us about Raid: Shadow Legends, I might have an aneurism.
This should def not be on RUclips warriors..OPSEC and high level op planning should be more internal. As a vet regardless of the above much respect and love heroes!
Adversaries will have access to this and more regardless of the public knowing how it works there isn’t much OPSEC to be broken. If actual immediate plans were being divulged I’d get it but the matter of doctrine is rarely ever fully classified. You have channels like Battle Order that go into excruciating detail on unit structure so keep that in mind.
This is a certified Multi-Domain Multi-Spectrum Combined Arms Operations
If y’all want somebody to drop chapters on your long form videos. I would love to do that. It may also make some of your longer videos more palatable and useful over time.
Thanks Ryan. We plan on breaking the full length video into chapter segments and posting, but wanted to get the finished flick out first so everyone would have access. You’re spot on, the shorter vids are more palatable and tend to work better for classes and LPDs.
Recommend adding time stamps to the current video. This will facilitate a focus on a specific topic and still maintain the ability to see how it is all connected.
@@usacaddhi 👋 I appreciate the attempt to make it easier to navigate, but I think you misunderstood what they meant in a way that has made your page more cluttered & difficult to navigate.
What they meant by chapters is that there is a feature on here where you can add timestamps to a RUclips video with descriptions of what's at the point in the video allowing people to quickly navigate long videos without having to guess where in the video core topics are discussed. If you break it up into multiple videos instead of having to search back & forth in one place you have to jump between entirely separate videos in a playlist which gets really tedious & counterproductive tbh.
@@usacaddplease utilize what @LHfrut said this is gonna be pivotal. If these videos need to be curated for short form content that’s a reflection of the state of the soldiers….
Meh, no need if you’re use to following S2 Underground
I’ve seen him in person. Such a great guy!
Having read the documents prior to 2012, this seems much more rational in appreciation of indirect fighting. I am also thrilled that we are taking seriously that combat and conflict take forms beyond shooting at each other; the Army needs to understand their place in shaping conflict in our favor regardless of the intensity and resourcing, and this is a great start.
I have no time nor need for chapters their a luxury, nothing beats pure initiative. Pause rewind, repeat.
Great!! Thanks a lot CADD!!
Timestamps:
0:00 Introduction by LTG Milford H. Beagle, Jr.
3:23 Introduction to FM 3-0 by COL (R) Rich Creed
4:37 Agenda
5:00 Preface - Evolving Doctrine
11:37 Ch. 1 - Foundations
24:00 Ch. 2 - Generating and Applying Combat Power
25:35 Ch. 3 - Fundamentals
44:16 Ch. 4 - Competition
45:41 Ch. 5 - Crisis
47:15 Ch. 6 - Armed Conflict
52:46 Ch. 7 - Maritime Environments
56:03 Ch. 8 - Leadership During Operations
59:12 Appendix C - Contested Deployments
1:00:03 - Summary of Major Changes
1:03:08 - Resources about FM 3-0
1:05:00 - Classroom Discussion and Questions
Nice! Thanks Jas.
Are we going to keep BCTs as a naming convention after the new 3-0 and Waypoint 2028?
The new structure has brought back pure brigades. FA, armor, and infantry. In an organization that loves to say words matter; what story is the Army trying to say still calling brigades “Brigade Combat Teams”.
Do we need to have 2 extra words to tell brigades they are to conduct combat and they are a team now that Brigade commanders will not have direct control of EAB assets through all operations ?
With the release of FM 2-0, are there any plans to to provide an overview similar to this video?
Great explanación. Thanks
Sir, with all due respect; this new program won't end up as one of those "Check the Boxes" doctrines from the 1980s will it? (ALLONS!)
What is the reason why Mission Command was not added to the Combat Power slide?
The slide depicts the warfighting functions. Mission command would be incorrect as command and control (C2) is the warfighting function. Mission command is the Army's approach to command and control that empowers subordinate decision making and decentralized execution appropriate to the situation. Refer to ADP 6-0, Mission Command (July 2019) for more information on C2 and mission command.
Where can we find the slides used for this briefing?
The slide deck is posted to the Central Army Repository (CAR) at: atiam.train.army.mil/catalog/go/100.ATSC/F94902EA-F266-49F7-B592-2D6D41A729C4-1675182085899?page=1
@@usacadd thank you
@@usacadd is there another place where you don't have restricted acces?
@@corina-rubinibotoc5576 you can access and/or download the entire video at: atiam.train.army.mil/catalog/go/100.ATSC/75C1AA17-7392-40DC-9503-E5DC3BBF1B12-1675177928721?page=1
That's a tough looking beagle 🐕
Obvious question- when will ADP 3-0 be updated?
We're working on ADP 3-0 now and expect it to publish later this FY.
It’s interesting the army doctrine is so public I mean don’t enemy countries have a clear idea of how we operate?
Most of our publications are written at the unclassified level. There are some that are more strictly controlled, but we've made an effort to make Army doctrine more accessible to the Force. None of the videos we produce deal with sensitive subjects. Likewise with our podcast, Breaking Doctrine, we make sure to do a OPSEC scrub before posting. Finally, Army doctrine is subjective, not directive. We don't tell Commander's specifically how to operate, but give them the tools necessary to make sound decisions, plan and execute successful, doctrinally based operations...and that keeps the threat guessing on what we may do.
They do and it scares the hell out of them which is a deterrent itself. Doctrine is just that…our people, equipment, technology and relentless training takes doctrine to a level that our adversaries cannot anticipate with relative success. Great question!! 🇺🇸
i will use it in my daily life.
Hey this here is some not Government print office type thing that just messed up by failing the foreign service character of regular business so I want some regular course for just Justice Administration not some complicated version of what somebody assumes teaching defense would be, It is not taught and it is a job so making presentation groups about it was a no go I really meant that for instance work is only done with tags on inside of door is a regular standard maybe one that needs to be put in the beginning of strategic online briefings everyone does not get the same job so bringing everyone to know is difficult and the team is supposed to be able to communicate that the office supports different jobs without all of the work twords clearance overworking it's undermined basic duty determination in more than one case.
Hey Sr. With all the respect. Your name tape is not leveled.
😇👍
Stop Every crime
Mosaic warfare
Stop cyber crime
Nearly a trillion dollar budget and still have to have ads all over the videos. Sad.
Corporations milking the government and taxpayers.
RUclips nonsense I’m afraid. Now even “unmonetized” videos can get commercials unless the Uploader goes out of their way to unmonetize them. Even then, it seems like a bit of a crapshoot.
Of course, I’m only a third of the way through. If General Beagle up there takes a moment to talk to us about Raid: Shadow Legends, I might have an aneurism.
This should def not be on RUclips warriors..OPSEC and high level op planning should be more internal. As a vet regardless of the above much respect and love heroes!
There’s not much in this video or FM 3-0 that is an opsec issue
Adversaries will have access to this and more regardless of the public knowing how it works there isn’t much OPSEC to be broken. If actual immediate plans were being divulged I’d get it but the matter of doctrine is rarely ever fully classified. You have channels like Battle Order that go into excruciating detail on unit structure so keep that in mind.
Stop cyber crime
Stop cyber crime
Stop cyber crime
Stop cyber crime