The BF1 sounds better but BFV is more realistic. The animations: BFV fixed the BF1 problems (G98 rechambering animation, Mannlicher Clip, etc) but there are too many bugs
I prefer BFV's animations, or at least, the ones unique to it. They seem so much more natural to me, BF1 seems a tad robotic in comparison at times, like with the double barrel and the rifle GL.
@@padraigpearse1551 i know right, maybe he refers to the bent bolt of kar98k but you know the one in bf1 is g98 not kar98k which g98 still has that straight bolt
I'm not hating on bfv by any stretch of the imagination but I still think that bf1 he much better lighting and sounds and is just over all much more shall I say clean or polished
I guess the only positive I can say about bfv is that while the lighting is a bit too bright,I like the fact they fixed the viewmodel fov.for example,notice how close the weapons are to the character's face and then notice how far the weapons are to the person's face in bfv,which imo is way better because your able to see more of the screen without the weapon getting in the way
Yeah.....but BF1 weapon appearance more like shiny plastic but in BFV weapon appearance more like real weapons but I prefer guns sound,and system in BF1
Well both Battlefield V and Far Cry 4 use their predecessors engine. So using its assets are a time saver. Though this fact makes Battlefield V's broken launch look even worse as the dev team had a solid platform to launch from, yet their game is barely passable.
@@sargesacker2599 true, I can't believe how people would find the games current state exceptable. DICE should departure from EA, as they really do care for their games unlike EA. So maybe we could get a remaster of this game, which doesn't ruin historical accuracy for an agenda and comes with everything we were promised!
The textures on the skin of the hands looks better in BF1. BFV hand textures don't seem to have any roughness on them and look incredibly flat, like just the albedo and normal maps are applied. It's weird. Model wise I think the BFV hands are a little bit better since they don't have the unusual bulbous look of the BF1 hands (especially around the thumb)
@@bigsmoke8816 IMO (I need to stress that this is MY OPINION), Battlefield 1 had much more smooth animations, more photo-realistic lighting, and had better sound design - Idk I guess I just like the echo. Not to say that BFV's (insert whichever category here) is bad, I just prefer BF1.
@@ivanrivera3293 ok, (in my opinion) bf1 is way to casual and doesent take a lot of skill to get good at the game, bfV has much beter gameplay Of corse its my opinion
@@bigsmoke8816 Oh, I thought we were just sticking to the subjects of the video. Well, in that case, I've heard that BFV has loads of bugs in the state it's in now, especially when compared to BF1's launch. However, that's the best I can give you considering that I haven't played the game.
Saying BF1 is better than BFV is like saying BF3 is better than BF4...... BFV is literally an upgraded version of BF1, with lots of NEW features that no one cares about as they are thinking how to insult EA and the hard-working devs for "not getting things right".
I don't get why Bf V has so much hate, the sounds are soooo much more realistic on V which for me is a good thing, not saying that 1 sounds bad I mean this isn't Call of Duty am I right haha and the graphics saying that V looks like plastic? 1 looks much more dull just look at the shovel again not saying that 1 looks bad just saying that V went to a much more realistic gun sounds and detail look. Both games are amazing and addressing the hate yeah Bf V is buggy and their marketing was utter shit but come on remember Bf 4 when it came out and how it is at the end of their lifespan best modern shooter, be patient with DICE and blame EA
Rafa Cauich couldn't agree more with this comment! People are just still complaining about that first reveal trailer. The game is awesome, and in so many ways better than bf1
The people hate battlefield V because the first trialler it was more fantasy because the world at war 2 not like that but if they just put Gamescom trialler it was to better and more realistic
Reloads and animations goes to bf1 all the way. But shell ejections are fixed(synced with the bolt) in bfv. And let us not forget the near perfect explosions in bfv.
People are saying battlefield V looks like shit people need to think about how these are 2 different deserts and malnutrition was a problem during ww2 and that’s may be why the hands are skinny.
well remember the G98 is a 90 degree bolt. If you ever fire a Mosin or an Arisaka Type 38 it's kind of awkward and you can leverage the rifle to assist in loading.
Also the Mauser 98 (G98) is a much longer rifle. The Kar98 is a shortened version originally cut down for use by Sturmtruppen in World War I. The exact 98 model was the Kar98AZ, later on in WWII they used the Kar98k.
BF1 entirely dev by DICE (Sweden) BFV mostly dev by DICE LA (used to be called Danger Close Studios) Yeh, Danger Close made Medal Of Honor, but do you remember how bad was Warfighter? Now you might understand why BFV feels so mediocre compared to BF1
Well, it would be very stupid to waste time to completely change the animations. At least, some of them are a little bit different, or completely reworked
4:09 please tell me i'm not dreaming on seing the bolt striker from BFV magically reseting back to it firing position without the bolt handle being pull.
The reflections on some of BFV’s Guns make the textures appear off. While the details are wayy better in BFV on the Guns I believe that the light, shadows and reflections in bf1 are much more realistic. If you had BFV detail bf1 lighting but without the odd contrasting, I’d think it’d look perfect
Geez. So many reused animations. Even Battlefield 4 used a lot of different animations for the exact same guns that were in Battlefield 3, so seeing this vid kinda makes them look lazy. Edit: that was a bit unfair of me. There are a few variations here and there in this video.
I don't understand the issue with this. They're the same weapons, it wouldn't matter if it was used in around WW1 or WW2, with the exception of being another variant for the time period. The way I was taught to reload my M-16 is pretty much the same way my Dad was taught to reload his M-16 20 years before.
If BFV had BF1’s sounds but kept BFV’s animations (minus the 1912 pistol, Browning auto 5, MP-28, and also fixed the ridiculous Lee Enfield bolt animations) then I’d say it’d be perfect.
I say That bf5 and bf1 are really great games and I personally like bf5 better than bf1 now looking back realizing the way the comparisons are and I feel like there the same but bf5 has more color and it’s bright and bf1’s is kinda like Dark of more sometimes a depressing way(some maps) Even tho I understand that it was ww1 but I would have liked bf1 to have bf5 graphics-
Guys before you say something play the game. I also see that here textures looks worst but im game is another thing. Textures are better defined and there is an option which improves so well sounds. With the last patch reloads everithing is so better
Bf 1 looks better this is why EA should stop shitting out games most of the guns have the same animations bf v had to make male and females almost the same size so they didn’t have to do more work on animation
Yo no entiendo, solo se quejan de call of duty y acá se nota claramente que la mayoría de las animaciones son exactamente iguales, pero como battlefield v es considerado "el mejor shoteer de la historia" todos prefieren callarse
i my opinion bf V have more realistic graphics than bf 1 the like bf V have better fov than bf 1 and the bf V hand have more details than bf 1:s hand so thats the why i think bf V have better graphics :) and the weppon in bf V have more scratch es and it look more it have been in combat than bf 1 :v
I just got a feeling when I watching this video, Most of all BF1's weapons looks clean and smooth but BFV's weapons looks some got an old and scratch that feeling like BF3's graphic, Anyway I like BF1 then BFV
Bf1 is more detailed and realistic animations in bf1 only. Bf1 is the only gun that the most game were is being peaked. Only bf1 game details were peaked already in 2016. That should be bf5 instead bf1. Bf1 is better than cod ww2, bo4, and bocw. Bf5 just reused bf1 animation in almost of guns. Because it’s 2 years later but 1 year different between bfh, and bf1 improved a lot.
@Deifan Empire Aberkan-auguste yeah soldiers are supposed to be built solid so they can take the brutal environment of the wasteland but the character in bf5 looks like they haven't eaten in 2 weeks!
Actualy in bf5 the weapons sound much more realistic, they sound much more supresset and quieter whitch is what a gun in real life sounds like, becaus your ears receve those noises like that
i like all BFV animation but i dont like the shotguns animations and some details are missing. BF1 remain the Better one in details sound and the multiplayer as less bugs but the Scope some times doesn't work specifically whit snipers and shotguns (hit box) BFV is better in grafic animation and the sound is more realistic but the multiplayer is full of bugs and the scope jiggles around but for the rest is a good game
The BF1 sounds better but BFV is more realistic.
The animations: BFV fixed the BF1 problems (G98 rechambering animation, Mannlicher Clip, etc) but there are too many bugs
I like the new tatical reload on the Repetierpistole M1912, the soldier actually catches the remaining bullets on bfv
I prefer BFV's animations, or at least, the ones unique to it. They seem so much more natural to me, BF1 seems a tad robotic in comparison at times, like with the double barrel and the rifle GL.
What was the problem with the gewehr 98's bolt in bf1?
@@padraigpearse1551 i know right, maybe he refers to the bent bolt of kar98k but you know the one in bf1 is g98 not kar98k which g98 still has that straight bolt
@@helmikamahendrapriyanto6549 yeah exactly so I wonder what he means
3:08 Oh dear, REALLY!? I hope they fix that.
Edit: It has now been fixed
Edit no. 2: oh mein Gott, zat iz a lut of likez. Danke comradez!
Yeah. I've seen stuff like that in other games too, but it's gotten fixed. I'm sure they're getting around to it.
@@EvanG529 they will do. The B-A rifles in BF1 didnt have the hammers clocked in the beginning, now it's fixed!
imgur.com/a/IuUt9fT
@@latane2363 attaboy, DICE.
They going to fix that because by the repetier pistol the amount of bullets coming out are realistic
I'm not hating on bfv by any stretch of the imagination but I still think that bf1 he much better lighting and sounds and is just over all much more shall I say clean or polished
@Juhann Miguel Rodriguez I think he is saying that the model is more defined
The game doesn't looks like this video shows.... For real
@@demoniummacuarum7486 It does lol
BFV wins in grenades only.
@Deifan Empire Aberkan-auguste if you're talking about the hand models then you're blind
techltserious μόνο ρέ
Are you stupid?
It also wins on graphics
Smoke grenades in bf 1 are better but with less details
I guess the only positive I can say about bfv is that while the lighting is a bit too bright,I like the fact they fixed the viewmodel fov.for example,notice how close the weapons are to the character's face and then notice how far the weapons are to the person's face in bfv,which imo is way better because your able to see more of the screen without the weapon getting in the way
bf1: rsc rifle had empty mags
bfv : WTF. THERE ARE STILL ROUNDS IN THE RSC RIFLE
JhudielTheOne well to be fair bf1 had the same thing for a while
@@WorkInProgressX i dont know. there are some ammo in bfv while in bf1. it has no ammo in reload magazine
JhudielTheOne in bf1 the rsc ejected the clip with the bullets like it does on bfv plus the g95 has the same issue
I like how they hold weapons in BFV it looks realistic and how it would be like in one's POV
No moron would hold a mag thats sideways in a downward positition
Yea especially handguns, in BF1 it seems that the chara holds it right before his face, in BFV that looks way better
@@funky7127 Well Ian McCollum from ForgottenWeapons.com would do that, save your words until you have seen one.
tpose actually almost everyone held it like that.
@@don_p7546 how did their wrist survive
The heck is with the hand in Battlefield V? Day of Infamy looks better and it is in Source of all engines.
Yeah, i noticed that the firts time i opened the game, is not too difficult to create better models for hands and forearms
But if u see, the bullet model is even worse
I think it looks fine. It just looks a little more boney than most people are used to in a video game.
it looked like he has hand cancer.
Call of Duty WW2
ВF1 Win!!!
Yes BF1 > BFV
No, not for the animations
Bf V is much better
@Brandon Dinhno im gay
Yeah.....but BF1 weapon appearance more like shiny plastic but in BFV weapon appearance more like real weapons but I prefer guns sound,and system in BF1
People mock far cry 4 for using far cry 3 reload, same should go with bf1 and bfv
There not entirely the same, there are some minor tweaks from here and there that you might not notice at first.
Well both Battlefield V and Far Cry 4 use their predecessors engine. So using its assets are a time saver.
Though this fact makes Battlefield V's broken launch look even worse as the dev team had a solid platform to launch from, yet their game is barely passable.
@@sargesacker2599 true, I can't believe how people would find the games current state exceptable. DICE should departure from EA, as they really do care for their games unlike EA. So maybe we could get a remaster of this game, which doesn't ruin historical accuracy for an agenda and comes with everything we were promised!
What about mocking bf4 and hardline for using bf3 animations?
The textures on the skin of the hands looks better in BF1. BFV hand textures don't seem to have any roughness on them and look incredibly flat, like just the albedo and normal maps are applied. It's weird. Model wise I think the BFV hands are a little bit better since they don't have the unusual bulbous look of the BF1 hands (especially around the thumb)
I observe that too, the skin in bf 5 seems a bit downgrade
BF1 hand :Ogre Hands
BF hand: Dwarf Hands
😂
Battlefield V is technically better put together, as far as features go, but Battlefield 1 was better presented.
What are u talking about?its a shit game
BF1 >>>>>>>>> BFV
Ok what did bf1 do beter then bfV?
@@bigsmoke8816
IMO (I need to stress that this is MY OPINION), Battlefield 1 had much more smooth animations, more photo-realistic lighting, and had better sound design - Idk I guess I just like the echo. Not to say that BFV's (insert whichever category here) is bad, I just prefer BF1.
@@ivanrivera3293 ok, (in my opinion) bf1 is way to casual and doesent take a lot of skill to get good at the game, bfV has much beter gameplay
Of corse its my opinion
@@bigsmoke8816 Oh, I thought we were just sticking to the subjects of the video. Well, in that case, I've heard that BFV has loads of bugs in the state it's in now, especially when compared to BF1's launch. However, that's the best I can give you considering that I haven't played the game.
@@ivanrivera3293 yes that is anoying, but bugs can just get irond out in a bit
A lot of them look identical.
Because alot of them are
Re,knew me a bit of what happened from FC3-FC4. Yikes.
And there’s your problem Dice
Bf1 looks better than five tbh
Despite what it looks like, the M1911 reloads are not the same.
They're very slightly different
BF1 M1911 BFV M1911A1
@@SouthernerFloridain2006 Actually, EA and DICE fucked up. It said M1911 in Battlefield 1 but the in game model is the M1911A1.
Who still playing BF 1 ?
MEGA GAMER Bought it last week
A lot
Bf4
Haven’t touched it in a while but ima go back soon
MEGA GAMER who still plays bf2
Saying BF1 is better than BFV is like saying BF3 is better than BF4......
BFV is literally an upgraded version of BF1, with lots of NEW features that no one cares about as they are thinking how to insult EA and the hard-working devs for "not getting things right".
4:40 BF V
WOW bullets apear from nowhere from his hand.
What a magical trick!
In bf1 same
I don't get why Bf V has so much hate, the sounds are soooo much more realistic on V which for me is a good thing, not saying that 1 sounds bad I mean this isn't Call of Duty am I right haha and the graphics saying that V looks like plastic? 1 looks much more dull just look at the shovel again not saying that 1 looks bad just saying that V went to a much more realistic gun sounds and detail look. Both games are amazing and addressing the hate yeah Bf V is buggy and their marketing was utter shit but come on remember Bf 4 when it came out and how it is at the end of their lifespan best modern shooter, be patient with DICE and blame EA
Rafa Cauich couldn't agree more with this comment! People are just still complaining about that first reveal trailer. The game is awesome, and in so many ways better than bf1
Juhann Miguel Rodriguez people who still complain about that are just idiots. They just want a reason to hate this game
The people hate battlefield V because the first trialler it was more fantasy because the world at war 2 not like that but if they just put Gamescom trialler it was to better and more realistic
Cause bunch of cry babies are just wanna be cool by riding the hate bandwagon against bfv.
Triggered
Im not the only one who really likes the smoke grenade in bf5 right is so cool looking.
Reloads and animations goes to bf1 all the way. But shell ejections are fixed(synced with the bolt) in bfv. And let us not forget the near perfect explosions in bfv.
why does the animations on bf1 better than bfv? according to a lot of people it's the same.
If dice would've added the graphics and gun sounds from bf1 to bfv you would get a pretty solid looking game
The way the soldier holds the pistol in BF1 looks like he’s holding it with his foot
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
People are saying battlefield V looks like shit people need to think about how these are 2 different deserts and malnutrition was a problem during ww2 and that’s may be why the hands are skinny.
The way he bolts the G98 in BF1 is really weird but I can’t put my finger on why
well remember the G98 is a 90 degree bolt. If you ever fire a Mosin or an Arisaka Type 38 it's kind of awkward and you can leverage the rifle to assist in loading.
Also the Mauser 98 (G98) is a much longer rifle. The Kar98 is a shortened version originally cut down for use by Sturmtruppen in World War I. The exact 98 model was the Kar98AZ, later on in WWII they used the Kar98k.
2:38 Fingers go through fore grip in BF1?
BF1 entirely dev by DICE (Sweden)
BFV mostly dev by DICE LA (used to be called Danger Close Studios)
Yeh, Danger Close made Medal Of Honor, but do you remember how bad was Warfighter? Now you might understand why BFV feels so mediocre compared to BF1
This feels like bf3 vs bf4 because of the colors in the games
Battlefield 1 is the best
BF1 > BFV
Yes
BF1 was the start of CoD Fans ruining the game so nope
Nope
@@wave2582 amen to that bud saddened by it since ive been a fan when bad company 2 came out, id still with bf3 and 4
Nope.All of them are the best.
“Can I use ur homework?”
“Sure. Just change it a little so it doesn’t look like you copied.”
They looked the same
Well, it would be very stupid to waste time to completely change the animations. At least, some of them are a little bit different, or completely reworked
@@kevinros11 but they should've tried a bit harder instead of copying over almost every single animation bar like 2
@@padraigpearse1551 it's not something important, they have to focus on the maik game, animations are a visual thing
@@kevinros11 I mean they didn't even try with the main game so they could've at least given some effort in the animation.
@@PossQueen we dont know about game design, so we arent going to talk about these things that easy
5:14 Absolutely stunning, almost looks real. Still rocking battlefield 1 though too poor to afford battlefield V just yetlol.
Even Call of Duty would be embarrassed by this level of asset reuse.
DICE really can’t handle the yearly dev cycle.
A lot of WW1 guns were used in WW2 and I’m fine with developers reusing assets if the game is fun, which BFV isn’t.
G- Man BF5 is fun just filled with bugs
LOL AK reload anims in CoD is still used until now, how could BF worse than that?
G- Man bf5 is a lot of fun especially with friends
Don_ p75 They say the same thing about Fallout 76. lmao
4:09 please tell me i'm not dreaming on seing the bolt striker from BFV magically reseting back to it firing position without the bolt handle being pull.
i think you are the only one who noticed that. Maybe it's hydraulic based 😂
I personally like bf5 more but bf1 brings me nostalgia
After years bf fanboys insult call of duty for using recycled animations. Now compare your new game to the new MW
I like that they didn't remove BV1/2/3/4 reload animations until BV5!
BFV= Boring, unsatisfying, graphical downgrade.
BF1= Fun, extremely satisfying, graphics are somehow better.
Ur opinion both are great to me but bf5 needs more weapons
ur absolutely right
I thought bf1 was more boring then bf5 but bf5 was lacking in maps
The reflections on some of BFV’s Guns make the textures appear off. While the details are wayy better in BFV on the Guns I believe that the light, shadows and reflections in bf1 are much more realistic. If you had BFV detail bf1 lighting but without the odd contrasting, I’d think it’d look perfect
Geez. So many reused animations. Even Battlefield 4 used a lot of different animations for the exact same guns that were in Battlefield 3, so seeing this vid kinda makes them look lazy.
Edit: that was a bit unfair of me. There are a few variations here and there in this video.
The best comparison of weapons 👌
I don't understand the issue with this. They're the same weapons, it wouldn't matter if it was used in around WW1 or WW2, with the exception of being another variant for the time period. The way I was taught to reload my M-16 is pretty much the same way my Dad was taught to reload his M-16 20 years before.
People just see it as being lazy
Why did they recycle so many ww1 guns in their ww2 game? They didn’t even change any animations, just ripped them straight from bf1
If BFV had BF1’s sounds but kept BFV’s animations (minus the 1912 pistol, Browning auto 5, MP-28, and also fixed the ridiculous Lee Enfield bolt animations) then I’d say it’d be perfect.
How could you call that animation RIDICULOUS? It's almost the soul of Leec-Enfields! THE MAD MINUTE!
I say That bf5 and bf1 are really great games and I personally like bf5 better than bf1 now looking back realizing the way the comparisons are and I feel like there the same but bf5 has more color and it’s bright and bf1’s is kinda like Dark of more sometimes a depressing way(some maps) Even tho I understand that it was ww1 but I would have liked bf1 to have bf5 graphics-
Same
Does anyone else miss holding pistol's with two hands instead of this new one handed Officer style
Guys before you say something play the game. I also see that here textures looks worst but im game is another thing. Textures are better defined and there is an option which improves so well sounds. With the last patch reloads everithing is so better
I play both of them. I'd say that both looks great. However, I like BFV a little bit more. But the hands look a bit flat
I do not know why, but lighting looks better in the first one.
There's something a bit off with the animations in BFV but I just can't put my finger on it.
There less cool then in bf1, but there more realistic
@@bigsmoke8816 Some of them are. Some of them aren't.
Was that a pun? Also, I couldn't help but notice you're everywhere
Yayo' Ariowibowo
Me?
3:49 Yay! M30 Drilling is fixed
That bug still exists, but only in the Shooting Range.
Plus a firemode switch will fix it tho
Sound design and graphics took a step back in BFV
Bf 1 looks better this is why EA should stop shitting out games most of the guns have the same animations bf v had to make male and females almost the same size so they didn’t have to do more work on animation
Am I the only person on this planet who really enjoys battlefield v?
Alexander Walker yes
Yo no entiendo, solo se quejan de call of duty y acá se nota claramente que la mayoría de las animaciones son exactamente iguales, pero como battlefield v es considerado "el mejor shoteer de la historia" todos prefieren callarse
Estoy de acuerdo :v pero battlefield no deja de ser una gran saga (tanto como es cod)
@@arturogimenezrubio4433 si we pero si se quejan con COD que se quejen también con battlefield
Cierto y despues quieren que metan un modo zombies
BFV is one of the worst WWII game historically I've seen in my fucking life. Seriously, this game is disgusting.
The perspective in bf1 is worse, the gun is too close to the face
Everything is too pristine in bf1
People there is a reason why bf5 came after bf1, to make a improvement and while bf5 is not finished yet unlike bf1
i my opinion bf V have more realistic graphics than bf 1 the like bf V have better fov than bf 1 and the bf V hand have more details than bf 1:s hand so thats the why i think bf V have better graphics :) and the weppon in bf V have more scratch
es and it look more it have been in combat than bf 1 :v
Battlefield soldiers are professional speed loaders, and make the reloads look cool.
I just got a feeling when I watching this video, Most of all BF1's weapons looks clean and smooth but BFV's weapons looks some got an old and scratch that feeling like BF3's graphic, Anyway I like BF1 then BFV
Bf1 is more detailed and realistic animations in bf1 only. Bf1 is the only gun that the most game were is being peaked. Only bf1 game details were peaked already in 2016. That should be bf5 instead bf1. Bf1 is better than cod ww2, bo4, and bocw. Bf5 just reused bf1 animation in almost of guns. Because it’s 2 years later but 1 year different between bfh, and bf1 improved a lot.
I like it for the thumbnail for the Lewis gun for bf5 isn’t bf5 n
BFV is never gonna be so good until I see the M1 Garand
Hey there's a ton of other American weapons out there besides the M1 Garand. At least, I think so, not 100% sure.
@@dragonbornexpress5650 a friend of mine searched in the files and found a script called m1garandsomething
BfV looks like a made by one man
If you ask me, battlefield 1 is so much prettier graphically then battlefield 5
huh... BF1 felt better IMO
I hate how smooth and clean the bfv hands look, like clay or something, cod ww2 has better hands with veins and calluses on them
It’s literally the same thing just with different lighting
0:31 what is this gun pleaze
repieterpistole M1912
*sees a poster of reuse, reduce, recycle*
EA: that seems neat!
Let's see how long it takes until something breaks out in the comments section
Is it just me or does battelfield 1 look a lot better than the new one?
This guy lowered the game graphics as much has he can, there we go, theres your explanation
Why do I see bullet drop in the 5th game?
Anyone else hate the hand model of bf5😕?it looks really cheaply made though😥.
@Deifan Empire Aberkan-auguste they also look abnormally long almost like noodles.
@Deifan Empire Aberkan-auguste maybe that's the case but they do look really long.maybe it's the fov.
What if the people in BF5 were turning into beasts just like in Bloodborne lol?
@Deifan Empire Aberkan-auguste yeah soldiers are supposed to be built solid so they can take the brutal environment of the wasteland but the character in bf5 looks like they haven't eaten in 2 weeks!
The reload mechanics are the best I've seen! the game registers the round in the chamber!!!
I love sand in BFV more than in BF1
Right from the start there is something seriously wrong with bfv’s sounds
In the Video looks BF1 better than BFV but in real BFV looks better than BF1
No
So left is BFV right is BF1 right ?
Other way
The bullets in the m1928a1 are way too big to be 45's.
I recently bought BF1 after BF5‘s release for 10bucks and I‘m loving it lol
Wut console you play on
Bf1(2016)
Bf5(2018)
But bf1 sound and graphic are better than bf5 wtf???
Bf5 graphic is more better. But bf 1 sound is more better
Actualy in bf5 the weapons sound much more realistic, they sound much more supresset and quieter whitch is what a gun in real life sounds like, becaus your ears receve those noises like that
ruclips.net/video/i-6OxRBHG3o/видео.html
Bf V sounds are more realistics, same goes to the graphics the game doesn't looks like this
@Glorious Bastard but bf1's guns are mostly base
What a shame, DICE sold Battlefield 1 twice AND tried to push a narrative
SMH
If you've actually played BFV you would know how differently it handles and plays
La pintana vs la legua
Solo los que son de Chile entenderán
Tomorrow we all win
Creo que las armas de Battlefield 1 tienen mas detalles
What is wrong with the guys thumb in the BFV side of the thumbnail!? Ouch
Is BF:V WW1 game or WW2 game...?
What an uncomfortable and potentially harmful way of holding a Mp28
It looks like soldiers actually held it like that and they were trained to do that way.
I hate how they hold this weapon in BFV 0:56
Apparently the soldiers were trained to hold it that way, and some footages show that too. But I don't like it too
imagine buying the same guns twice for $60
I think BF1's weapons are having a good care
Battlefield 1 takes place on Mars and V takes place on the Moon
What are your computer specs
Yeah i'd like to know as well. It looks a hell of alot better on my xbox one x compared to this
BF1 sounds so much better
Bf5 sounds realistic
@@SwiftyEmpire Not really, some guns maybe but not all. My M1911 sound more like the one in Bf1
*BEST REUSABILITY*
i like all BFV animation but i dont like the shotguns animations and some details are missing. BF1 remain the Better one in details sound and the multiplayer as less bugs but the Scope some times doesn't work specifically whit snipers and shotguns (hit box) BFV is better in grafic animation and the sound is more realistic but the multiplayer is full of bugs and the scope jiggles around but for the rest is a good game