There is something called the Sahara desert. This served as a gene divider as they say. Those south of it decoupled the gene that causes darker skin, those north of it did for the one that caused lighter skin. Natural barriers lead to unique gene pool. The ancient Egyptians were not black Africans because there dna says they weren’t. The Sudanese south of Egypt, had many pyramids as well, which were black Africans who lived off the Nile, as any where else is desert. Ancient Egypt influenced them. Simple as that.
@@MarkSmith-vo1vn The Sahara didn't divide anything. Genetics has proven that the original North Africans were the Iberomaurusians and they were half black African. There goes your Sahara divide theory in the dustbin.
There will be a lot of new 'species' due to cloning, Synthetic DNA, Ai and nano particle manipulation through 3D printing. We are back in the days of Noah
And mixing genes of animals with other animals, plants with other plants, and animals are plants. I guess they're called hybrids, like that's a good idea.
Very true, but when this rhetoric is used to defuse the focus on a people group that is the perpetual target of disrespect, it becomes a way of reducing the effort of healing and unlearning that in necessary for the downtrodden to be raised to the level of equal respect you are describing. An inherent truth does not mean it is the current reality, but rather a goal that must be worked towards. If one person in a group of 5 gets slapped, and 3 of the 5 go to check on them saying they should not get slapped. And the remaining one says “nobody should get slapped. Well duh, but everyone hasn’t been slapped, they are checking on the individual that has been harmed. Hope that helps.
@@raijinenel3116earn respect? If any people that should be respected it would be Africans. They brought a lot into this world and no one would exist without them. Scientific fact. Most of us non Africans are even less human than they are because we have traces of Neanderthal dna. They have none
@@MCfact1827 not what you said.the auther is suggesting e1b1a1(e1b1b)orginated in asia.based on what evidence? And he suggested that they were olived skined Asians. When arabia is right on the equater line.not honest scholarship
@@MoneyB-r2y I think he said they were asian because he was eluding to that the west of africa hadnt been populated yet by the e1b1ba haplogroup prior to that. Since the creation of the suez canal arabia is considered in asia not africa, even though it sits on the african tectonic plate.
Dr Jeanson, the fact that 80% of Somali males carry the E1b1b gene is not a coincidence. It is a fact that kings and queens of ancient Egypt used to travel to Somalia. They claimed that it was the land of their ancestors which they called the "Land of Gods" & the "Land of Punt" Similarities of the Somali language and that of the ancient Egypt is mind-blowing. If you would like to come to Somalia to make further research, I would be happy invite you and be my guest.
@@jubilee203 You’re both right actually because in those days there were no imaginary borders like they are now, so the great lakes region could’ve included Somalia as well.
@@jubilee203 Or more than likely some tribes from the Great Lakes region migrated and settled where Somalia is now, while other tribes moved up the Nile towards Ethiopia, Nubia and Kemet.
Don't buy this revisionist rubbish. Either the few Kings of Egypt travelled to Somalia and impregnated several hundred or thousand women around the Somalia region or 80% of all modern Somalians are descended from one line. Or the Kings themselves originated from somewhere in East or North East Africa. Seriously. Use your common sense. Which is more likely?
@@tgr5772 This is jot just blind belief. The facts are there. When queen Hatsepshut travelled to the land of Punt, she met King Parehu & Queen Hatie ( Baraxow & Xadiyo) two known personalities in Somalia
Nothing is more commendable, than finding someone, who is seeking the Truth...totally unbiased. Unbiased Truth...is certainly a "Godly" act. To go where the Truth leads...regardless of one's "feelings", is what all should strive for. It is refreshing to find a scholar who seems to be doing just that.
The lecture was exhilarating,surely _however Mr.Jeanson's humility, in the face of discovering how The Bible ultimately proves itself, was absolutely wonderful to behold and added an element of - Look up & Rejoice - while we watched in awe! Thank you everso much!
This does not prove anything about biblical origins at all. What this does is make huge assumptions. The very fact he is starting at the end (ie modern times) creates a systemic flaw in his backwards tracing. Let me give you an example. Take modern Jews, he is looking at the biblical line taking the modern Jewish data and walking that backwards to his believed biblical beginning. The problem with this method is that it is all based on the assumption that modern Jews are in fact direct descendants of Jacob and there by Abraham. What if modern Jews are not actually descendants of Jacob. So what he has done is in fact traced modern Jewish people back to a certain group which can neither be confirmed or denied to be of a particular son of Noah. His whole assertion that that group in ancient history is any given son of Noah is solely based on a modern understanding of who that group is today. For example Libyans are from this Son of Noah so if I take modern Libyans DNA and go backwards I need to end up and assign them to this Son of Noah. This can also be said about any other group he is walking backwards Egyptians Libyans Europeans etc etc. What this data shows and not surprisingly at all is that we all eventually end up back in the area around Africa Asia Europe intersection. Which Mitochondrial DNA puts at about 250,000 years ago not 6,000 years ago. We know that at one point Humans were as few as 1,000 people but that time is far earlier than 4500 years ago. He is using DNA to try and prove a Biblical "correctness" but to do so you have to ignore all of the other DNA evidence that denies the time frame and the origins of various groups etc etc.
@@stepheng905 " ... you have to ignore all of the other DNA evidence that denies the time frame and the origins of various groups etc etc." What other DNA evidence?
@@l.m.892 There are dozens of study's that show there was a population bottle neck of as few as 1,000 breeding pairs some where around 60,000 years ago if you take a mean statistical point in the estimates. The latest being about 35,000 years ago and the earliest being about 100,000 years ago. Any of the dates shows at least 2,000 adult humans tens of thousands of years before "Adam and Eve" let alone Noah and his sons. Mitochondrial DNA shows that "Eve" was some 300,000 years ago. The list of studies is really quite endless.
Ezekiel 29 tells us all we need to knw about modern Egypt. About ancient; well the fact that mizraim and cush were brothers. No Arabs nor Caucasian mentioned
@@l.m.892 Mitochondrial DNA has the "Eve at 200,000 plus years ago. We know at one point about 50,000 years ago there were less than 10,000 Humans. Either way both dates are much older than 6,000 years. Never mind what DNA is telling us about where certain groups come from and even more importantly where they do not come from
Thanks for your reports about human ancestral history, I would recommend if want talk about this topic to sit and talk with the native people you are talking about, I am glad we are talking about His-Story not ours. Kushitic people deserve to talk about their knowledge before DNA. More over modern Egyptian are mixed race and they don't like to be considered African. Thank you.
It’s a good thing that you have dispelled the myth that E1b1a has always been in west Africa but there are some geneticists that believe that the E group originated in the Levant which is really North East Africa. E1b1a is the nemesis because it does not really fit within the Cushitic bloodlines so I don’t agree that E1b1a is a Hamitic bloodline and I also don’t agree with the placing of Japhetic bloodlines under Shem. More research is definitely needed here!
@@benyahudadavidlE1B1b is more indigenous Arabs, such as Ishmaelite, Joktanites not Hamites. Hamites are more A and B lineages. But spot on about E1b1a being Israel
😮Are the dominoes beginning to fall?!! I see "BLACK" Israelites who were in Egypt who dispersed to "beyond the rivers of Ethiopia"... and I see the Greek and Roman invasion into Hamitic Mizraim... surely our fathers have inherited lies - white Christians (not excluding other nations). It's also funny how a certain "ish" news organization revealed Canaanite blood in "Palestine" area today 🤔hmmm....
What happened in South Africa is a tropical example of what happened in Israel and Egypt If what happened in South Africa was the time of war and battle,black south Africa wouldn't have gotten their land back, just as black Israel and Egyptian were unable to retrieve their land back from the white invader, there is no way you can hide the truth.
@tegaolayemicredo462 no. There is not apartheid in Israel. That idea is illogical relative to the facts. Ask any South Afrikaner... they will all tell you that's crazy... Israel does not qualify in any way, by definition, as an apartheid state. 😅😆🤣😂😅😂🤣😅🤣😂
@@kateescarlet9693, What evidence do you have to support your claims? What example can be used to discredit the cliam the person in this post is suggesting and one in the video? What of this video can be refuted by scientific research? I couldn't find information on the DUCK therory on a Google search. Where did you find out about this therory and where can I go to find out more information? What does this therory states?
If you’re sincere about replacing the Darwin perspective you will need to confront the anti Black narrative of the early writers envolvement in race science and eugenics. All who wrote that indigenous Black inhabitants could not have created advanced civilizations like Egypt. Also it’s creation can’t be attributed to Arabs who invaded Egypt 32 dynasties after its creation and installed a completely different culture.
Once you start down the road to disproving ideas/narratives, you will be doing it forever. It is better to present the evidence and let it stand. The former looks like you have an axe to grind; the latter I'd a position to advocate.
Lol egyptians not black africans not arabs not white peoples. please study peoples of the world. Facts are facts whether u like them or not. Egyptians never black.
Telling the historical truth is NOT " an axe to grind " . Your type of " An axe to grind " is a subjective perspective . If Jews spoke about the monster that is evil Nazism , will you make a false accusation against them of " having an axe to grind " ?
Patrick Lyons - Streets that follow like a tedious argument Of insidious intent To lead you to an overwhelming question ... Oh, do not ask, “What is it?” Let us go and make our visit.
I agree with the conclusions reached that the ancestor to E1b1a and E1b1b, identified as (E1b1), originated in North East Africa possibly where the Aksum kingdom was located. And, It is plausible that around 700 - 400 BC a split took place between the two Y DNA lineages based on the creationist timeline. It’s ironic that were it not for the E1b1b connection to E1b1a, the world would have thought that E1b1b was of West Asian origin instead of African origin as noted at 43:59 in the video. In modern times, E1b1a is showing up in the DNA of Egyptian pharaohs like Ramses III. This means E1b1a (the same Haplogroup I have as an African American) was significantly present in ancient Egyptian DNA. It can’t be ruled out that E1b1a migrated to West Africa from Egypt. And, it’s possible that E1b1 originated in the Levant instead of the Horn of Africa. After all, the ancient Natufians of the Levant carried haplogroup E. Ancient maps referred to the Levant and southern Arabia as north east Africa or the land of Ham. Either way, E YDNA is an African lineage to which I am proud to belong.
His research is based on the European view on Bantu history. The African view is a migration from the middle east. This makes both E1b1* rooted in the same place in the middle east. Another problem with this video and creationist views is that they still use the evolutionist view of history. The Biblical view state the Ark landed at Mt Ararat. So ALL peoples MUST have a common point of origin. This fact makes his DNA tree as to who Shem, Ham and Japheth is complete nonsense.
Thank you Dr. Jeanson your elaborate and scientifically based explanation is the start of a long rehabilitation and reconstruction process of African, more so Kemitic history. As an original and indigenous Sudanese (The Bari: Eastern Nilotic of ancient Nubia now Sudan) and after comparing cognates, religious practices and now your testimony on ancient haplogroups, this indeed is a reaffirmation of the African/Kemitic origins of one of the world's greatest civilisations."Truth is like death after life, it sure will come". Old kemetic saying. The ancestors are watching
The thing is people will find something wrong with his study as well..im not sure why they are so convinced that they were somehow European or Middle Eastern when it has been proven that even the so called Middle Eastern people are a branch if Black Africans who went in that land and geography intervened and changed their appearance. So yes even they started off Black African..They all did prior to physical changes..plus how they believe they were European when at that time science tells us that Europeans in the modern sense were what they looked like today..But yet they will still hold on to racist views to what is obvious but they have a right to believe what they want even if it's not true..Plus they painted themselves as they saw themselves and they were Black African but because these people have a view of Black Africa as 1 type never minded that Black people come in a variety of shades and brown is one of them..They show paintings of them staying Nubians to try and prove a point but in those painting they are represented as the same color in some but they don't show you the other side of that same box in Tuts tomb that depict him saying those of the Levant and Asiatics and in NONE of them are they depicted the same color but they won't show that part..They show them as having white skin for men and women..Thats the way they saw them..But if they were the same color as them then they would paint them the same color as them which they did not..So it's evident they knew what colors to use but on their paintings they really do depict some Nubians the same color as them..Explain their insight on why that is cause that doesn't make sense but one thing you won't see is them showing that picture and the reason is because they can't explain that away..They started off Black African and eventually mixed over time to what we see today..In Max Planck study they didn't test those in the south like Aswan because they knew what they would find..Why would you do a so called DNA test but not include everyone in the region unless you knew what the results would show..that was purposely done to play with those thay want those results so bad and when they were called out ok it they had to come clean as far as their techniques..That completely discredited the results and that is why it is not excepted..Couldn't stand uo to peer review amd you should look at what these other scientists wrote. Some were just straight up upset they would put out bad info but we know why..So before you try to use that study read the whole thing cause you'll just be embarrassing yourself..Be blessed all my brothers and sisters and search for truth and always be unbias amd you'll find it..peace up..
@@dreamdiction That is why the paint themselves black and say that that they are from the Mountains of the Moon, which ia locate South of the Sahara, between tanzania and Uganda. That is why the language is similar to thw Wolofe people in Senegal, West Africa. That is why they orientate themselves to the south the interior of Africa instead of North. Yea right!
@@lindsaywaterman2010 There are over a hundred anatomical differences between Negroid and Caucasian races. For example, the negroid skull is DOUBLE the thickness of the Caucasian skull, negroid arms are three inches longer than Caucasian arms, the anatomical differences between Negroid and Caucasian skeletons are so obvious that even an untrained child can separate them. Embalming was the standard method of burial for ancient Egyptians of all social classes, tens of thousands of ancient Egyptian mummys have been examined and they are all Caucasian.
Ancient HAMIT land of origin was from 4502-900bc was in south Asia(india) and southeast Asia. ALL brown or black peoples. With migrations to (northeast Africa) from 4212-1000bc. FACT!
Africa is settled by NOD peoples 17,000bc- AD2024 from the ,*EDEN realm. Just like the HAWILAH(Americas), KUSH (Australia), AZZUHR (pre-Eurasians). All before the worldwide flood events of 4502bc, the latter Bronze Age wars 2400-1000bc, and the Euro colonialism AD1400s-1900s. FINALLY THE TRUTH!
Africa is the garden of eden. The middle east was once part of Africa. Ham himself was black, as were his offspring. The cradle of civilization is Africa. The Arabs themselves came from black Africa.
True look at the Egyptian statues look at Somalians it’s open evidence. The 1st so-called historians couldn’t comprehend black Africans were capable of such achievements so they separated Egypt from the rest of Africa. Egypt is a country by the Nile meaning various tribes n peoples moved to avoid desertification of the Sahara
Stop lying. As an Israelite I can assure you that we have no friends. Socalled nonblack people are not our brothers and sisters. They are hybrids ie sapiens neanderthal ie not naturally occurring. Shalom
Hi, I went to the museum in Cairo and saw in glass cases multiple mummified Pharaohs. Why not compare the DNA taken from some of those (dating back a couple of millennia BC) to the Egyptians of today?
@@rohayeha Over the last 5000 years populations around the eastern Mediterranean and the Middle East have mixed a lot and this is readily apparent in the DNA. DNA analysis has in fact been done of ancient Egyptian mummies from various periods, with results that match these population movements. Modern Egyptians also show DNA overlaps consistent with the population movements of the last 2000 years as well. This information is all readily available with a quick Google search leading to articles in journals like Science.
@@rohayeha - Egypt was conquered by the Greeks in 322 BC, by the Romans in 30 BC and later by the Ottomans in-the 7th century AD. The Egyptian of today is not the original Egyptian, but Arab. Mizraim, son of Ham was the Father of the Egyptian. The Copt of Egypt is a descent of the original Egyptian of the Pharaohs.
@@masada2828 No doubt the Copts are descendents who also got mixed otherwise there is no logic in saying that in the middle of a desert in Africa a white skinned race evolved naturally. If the ancient Egyptians were migrants then the first people to reach Egypt will also be Africans
This is fascinating. I am Scandinavian in appearance but I have northern African, western African and Nigerian genetic as well. Yet I am very pale white with blond curly hair. This all makes sense to me now. Please keep unraveling the fabric of the Mystery of the History of Humanity. Well done.
@@Evidence1Only1 It was called 'Aigiptos' by the Greeks, deriving from the indigenous name of a temple in the country: He-Ku-Ptah In de course of time in developed into ne name Egypt
yes it will because turkey was the landing spot of noah and the restart ofthe human race and when do enogh family reseach like i have all back to garden of eden then you will know the truth
Hello! There is history written in 1905 at South Africa the document is called the short history of the native tribes of the Transvaal. The history is about the people who stayed in South Africa then,it includes the Bantu who travelled from north Africa to Southern Africa. Some of the groups written about are Batswana called Bakwena ba Bafokeng. It is stated their oral history shows that they came from Ethiopia, passed by Egypt and crossed Sahara desert when they travelled to Southern Africa. Today some Batswana (some people of Botswana) say they originate from Egypt. There is one research done on genes of children in Botswana,the research found that thier genes were similar to genes of Luhyia people of Kenya. These Luhyia are said to originate from Egypt.
😂😂😂😂, came from Ethiopia then passed by Egypt then crossed the sahara desert then went down to south Africa without carriages or horses. Call Guinness records
@@charmingyoutuber2408 No camels were known in the Arabian desert not the African, they were only introduced to Africa through Arabian caravans since 800 bc and were used in Africa from 200 AD mainly in the eastern and northeast Mediterranean Africa and much later to West or South Africa. So Again from Arabia to the East and the North, not from South and West to the North East
@@Sema-Tawy I hear you. What time period were the people in the OC migrating through? Your timeline for camels still leaves over 2000 *known* years of travel with them.
Thing about your video, you seem to be guessing, when you say e1b1b and e1b1a seems to be in the same area at one time, but you don't know where, have you considered that this place is Egypt? during the time of Israel's slavery? your guessing is way off, you should do more historical study, If you read Josephus writings, he was a first century historian. it could help you a lot.
Although I am a proud descendant of Africa, I have three grandparents who were either half or part Native American. However, only one of them was from the Indigenous list in your video. My maternal grandmother was half Choctaw, but she had bluish gray eyes. Her blue eyes passed down to my daughter and one of my cousins at birth. At birth, meaning they were only born with blue eyes. My daughter's eyes were dark blue and my cousins eyes were light blue, but they now have green eyes as their eyes changed as they grew up from blue to green along with another cousin who was born with green eyes. One of my cousins and I were born with blonde hair which passed down to my daughter. Now, I have reddish-brown hair, but my cousin's blonde hair turned black, and my other cousin was born with and still has red hair. We Black Americans never know what our kids will look like as we are a mixed group. Our slave ancestors were the first Mulatto group born to slaves and their white masters. Moreover, the mixture continued until many of our ancestors began to look white. It was after slavery was abolished and our Mulatto ancestors married African or Black American spouses and bore children with them that we finally started to look more like our African ancestors.
please study quite a few more Answers in Genesis videos, moreover their books, and in a nutshell realize there is only one human race. Being "proud descendant of Africa" may seem fashionable (as in the preponderance of questionalbe BLM activities) however your mention of eye & hair colors indicate something other than African OR native american descent, such as north european (viking) genes. In addition your choice of "white masters" is inaccurate and perhaps intentionally offensive, since the African tribes themselves sold their neighbors not only to "white" buyers but predominantly central & south America. If you have been watching more videos in this series, and checking other sources, you would know that the great majority of slaves were bought by South American "bipoc" owners. In fact in 2023 there are even more BIPOC slaves on this planet than ever have been before, many are children mining elements required for cell phones and EV's. Finally, The goal is not to "look more like" anything other than... to BE more like Christ, mere "looks" are deceiving....as MLK advised-- don't judge people (including yourself) by your skin (eye) color, but by the content of your character, and this is what Jesus in fact will do. Please take this comment to heart, and be part of an inclusive one-race, the human race, ignoring skin/eye/hair color, get back to what really matters-- love for ALL no matter where they come from, and rewarding actual achievements no matter what the ethnicity.
@@cherylanon5791 Why don't you learn reading comprehension skills? Then you will comprehend that my comment is not about her series or other videos, it is to corroborate with her title and something she said in this particular video using my own life experiences. I do not sit around just watching videos; I am too busy for that in addition to how much I cannot stand self-appointed ignorant people who incorrectly correct other people. I usually ignore ignorance, but I felt compelled to respond to your circumlocutory, protracted ignorance. I am an educator with several college degrees and graduate degrees. Some of those degrees are in Educational Science and Research. Educators and professional researchers are lifetime learners through research studies. However, this is not a classroom or a research lab, it is a comment section where people can comment on any part of what the content creator says that resonates with them as well as socialize, hence the term social media. Apropos, my comment was meant for the content creator, it was not addressed to you. When you mind your own business and keep your nose out of other people's business, no one will know how ignorant you are.
@@GailBecker-MSED-CM-Author I think what she was trying get at is that most of the world is tired of any sentence that starts off with "I'm a proud descendant of Africa" ... all everyone hears is Pride this, and Pride that... I think for once it would be nice if black people, or anyone for that matter, tried practicing humility instead of pride. It would be nice to see that. Just once.
@@derekmunson3695 Then I suggest that when you hear it or see it, don't listen or read it. Just ignore it and move on because you only know what you are tired of! You do not know what most of the world knows or feel, only GOD knows that. Moreover, I will say and write what is in my heart. No one is going to tell me not to be proud of my African heritage. You could have kept that surreptitious racist epithet to yourself! You know nothing about me, but what I do know is that when someone makes an accusation about a stranger without knowing anything about her (especially never having met), it usually means that is who he is. Sometimes, it is wise to mind your own business, especially when the comment is not addressed to you. That, apropos, is humility!
I’m proud of my Germanic heritage. I’m also proud to be an American. But Biblically we are one family. All distant cousins. Now we are proving the biblical texts are true through genetic evidence. It’s ok to be proud of where you came from but never stop learning. Ps college degrees mean nothing to me.
It was about time with this breakthrough in the history of ideology and the "eyeopening per excellence"! You did it! This will stir up and calm down simultaneously - exactly what was needed. You will be mentioned, remembered, referred to and used as a tool in the process of human development.
I truly appreciate this presentation from someone credible. The explanations make sense by answering those ambiguous teachings children learned in school, and the questions these kids asked about the Bible.
This is the number of years since you joined, and the number of views you've had in those years. You're the common denominator! Now you have something legitimate to laugh at.
I don't trust your research, the Kemetyu are the descendants of Anu the diminutive people who built the High Culture/Civilization of the Hapi/Nile Valley. They tell you where their Ancestors came from, " the foothills of the mountain of the Moon Kilimanjaro". The euraisans are not the people who built the Culture and Spirituality of Ta-Marri, it was the Anu who built Ta-Seti and Ta-Hehesi. From the beginning of the Nile Valley Civilization in Afrika, it was Afrikans and their Culture, Language and Spirituality that shows it is an Afrikan Civilization. In the Language it shows that they used what they saw to name and use in their vernacular and speech, no euraisan would use anything that is not in their environment to incorporate into their language because they would have never saw it so how would they be able to identify a vegetable or fruit and they never seen it. It is an Afrikan Civilization.
@@derickthomas1013 Not one single evidence shows what you say . This “ they came from the mountains of moon “ was invented by hotebs in black communities and has 0 evidence.
I don’t trust your opinions either. Because you use the past tense incorrectly. Not never saw it. Never SEEN it. And not they never seen it. Never SAW it. If you murder the English language who knows what you’ve done with your ‘history?’
This is excellent research and it answers a lot of questions for me. I'm a Afro Descedant/Afro-American. I have traced my family lineages and found living relatives in west and central Africa. When I received my results from 23 and me my Y Dna showed up as E-M4451 which is in the family of E1b1a and it shows I'm connected to the Pharaoh Rameses the III EV38. In west African history there are many oral stories about Egyptian migration to that area.
E1B1A Y Haplogroup is the lineage of Jacob. The original genetic children of Jacob called Israel it is also documented with credible nonsensical sources of scholarship. But each person has to determine the truth of any evidence presented as factual.
This is wonderful work! I have been so disappointed the way Christians have capitulated to mainstream science by also selling out the Bible. I have known if God let evolution take over his creation he would have said so. Also these ridiculous dates science comes up with while dating artifacts and geology are just all over the place and given a little prodding doesn't stand up. As someone with mostly Nordic lineage with a lot of family with middle Eastern appearance your lecture definitely hits home.
Carbon dating is not "all over the place". Isotopes give a pretty accurate date, with + or - range. Did you take chemistry or geology? Rigorous science.
What the heck is "mainstream science"? Geology, physics, chemistry, biology, if these interfere with your religion I gotta say there must be superstition in the mix.
FYI, Abraham had other sons besides the two. Gen. 25:1-6 Abraham had taken another wife, whose name was Keturah. 2 She bore him Zimran, Jokshan, Medan, Midian, Ishbak and Shuah. 3 Jokshan was the father of Sheba and Dedan; the descendants of Dedan were the Ashurites, the Letushites and the Leummites. 4 The sons of Midian were Ephah, Epher, Hanok, Abida and Eldaah. All these were descendants of Keturah. 5 Abraham left everything he owned to Isaac. 6 But while he was still living, he gave gifts to the sons of his concubines and sent them away from his son Isaac to the land of the east.
@@bookmouse2719 I don't think so. He sent Hagar(the EGYPTIAN!) away BEFORE Sarah died. AFTER Sarah died he married a woman by the name of Keturah. A DIFFERENT WOMAN. By the way, Since Hagar was Egyptian & she got an Egyptian wife for her Son Ishmael; it's a revelation that ISHMAEL-and HIS offspring were 75% HAMITIC, 25% SEMITIC. With that information it is more accurate to assess-for those who believe the original Hebrews were "black"-I'd say.....THEY HAVE THE WRONG SON! Think about it😉😏✌️
Thank you for touching on the Bantu people, our history gets blurred after 300 or so years, but I enjoyed your analysis. It is in line with some of the theories on Bantu migration.
The history of the Bantu is blurred because there is a big cover up of the truth. Even this research is covering up the truth by keeping Haplogroup E’s origins out of the Levant which is really North Africa. He is giving our history to some European white folks.
It seems you left out the Biggest Depopulation Event in Africa which is the Sub-Saharan Slave Trade and the Indian Ocean Slave Trade. Arabs and Berbers had many Concubines of Africans enslaved. Many of their Sons did the same thing. You should factor this in. Just trying to Help
Faut savoir que le MOT ESCLAVE signifie celui qui est dominé par quelqu'un ou quelque chose, DONC tu peux être esclave des cigarettes, de téléphone, de la télé, , d'alcool, de la vie de debauche, le sexe, de critique, de sorcellerie, la jalousie, du manger, d'orgueil, de colère....DONC tout le monde est esclave de quelque chose. Voir le dictionnaire. Allô salut bonjour coucou!!!🤣
Im a somali, that makes me E1B1B L3. One of the oldest lineages that still exists in its ancient states. Older than arabs and the rest of them. Our language is only spoken and not written. We never migrated nor we mixed, which makes us genetically original till this day. If you really want to see and know the cradle of humanity. Then go to Somalia. And by the way, these are new findings and confirmed by modern science. Loved this video. By the way, 99% of somalis dont even know this due it being found recently due to DNA advancing
I made a dna study on my brothers' dna and it came out to be 30, 000 years old from Arabia (Sumerian) and my mother's from Sudan 15,000 years ago both migrated to the west Europe, Spain and England, then to France and finally to Scandinavia.
You say "it came out to be 30,000 years ago". Who told you this? How did they know? Do you believe them? What evidence have you seen that convinced you?
Yes I believe them, Both looked unlike most Finns , dark and reddish hair, both were interested in Egypt and Arabian countries and art. My mom looked like the Russian Emperor Nicolai II. My dad looked like the UK royality in Australia. They told me I have lots of relatuves in UK.
My parents never knew their origin, but both acted unlike many Finns. They traveled a lot. My mother was an painter and had made unusually extravagant clothes and she looked egyptian. My dad traveled a lot. They spoke fluently various languages. They did things Finns rarely do. They felt often that they did not belong here. It made a lot of sense to me when I heard their genetic origins.
@@joh99954j "FUTURE" PROPHECIES FOR EGYPT 👇 (Isaiah 45:14) Thus saith the Lord, The LABOUR OF "EGYPT" and merchandise of Ethiopia and of the Sabeans, men of stature, shall come over unto thee, and THEY shall be THINE: they shall come after thee "IN CHAINS" they shall come over, and they shall FALL DOWN UNTO THEE, they shall make supplication unto THEE, saying, Surely God is in thee; and there is none else, there is no God. (Zechariah 14:16-18) And it shall come to pass, that every one that is left of all the nations which CAME AGAINST Jerusalem shall even go up from year to year to worship the King, the Lord of hosts, and to keep the feast of tabernacles And it shall be, that whoso will NOT come up of all the families of the earth unto Jerusalem to worship the King, the Lord of hosts, even upon THEM shall be no rain And if the family of "EGYPT" go not up, and come not, that have no rain; there shall be the PLAGUE, wherewith the Lord will SMITE the HEATHEN that come not up to keep the feast of tabernacles (Joel 3:19) "EGYPT" shall be a DESOLATION, and ED-OM shall be a desolate wilderness, for the VIOLENCE AGAINST the children of JUDAH, because they have SHED innocent BLOOD in their land
I've had the book "Traced" prior to viewing this video and have gone through it, it is amazing. This video has renewed my interest in studying history, origins etc.
Congratulations, Dr. Jeanson ! I've been waiting for my copy to arrive, only to be informed it's first printing sold out. I am now waiting til July. Congratulations 🎉 again
السلالة Eمن أصول نيجيريا في إيران وجودهم اكثر من 10000الف سنة j1_M267 وجودهم في إيران اكثر من 10000الف سنة البروفسور ناثانيال ت.جينسون كلامه صحيح تاريخيا وعلميا بالمرصاد على كل كذاب اشر في العالم
E1b1 was in the entirety of North Africa during the holocene(Green Sahara) . Tasilli N Ajjer art work and the Uan Muhuggiag mummy prove this. Kemet was the child of proto east and west/central Africans. This is reflected in the DNA of the Royals.
I find this fascinating. Thanks so much for this series and this channel! On a lighter note (😊) Are there any R2d2 or C3p0 lines? How long have these DNA lines been named in this manner-just wondering, cuz if it began pre-Star Wars era, those character names might add a whole new layer of subtext to the storyline, lol!
Glad to see someone else wondering the same thing I've been asking myself (which doesn't get me very far) since his original series at the beginning of covid.
Maybe in your Sequel to "Traced" you can put more in how the Old Testament book of Genesis is encoded in the Chinese language itself. Before B.C. the Chinese worshipped a single God. The word "Create" in Chinese has the imagery of "God Spoke" and so on. The Garden, The Fall, The Flood, Tower of Babel and even the dates for Jesus' Birth/Cruxificion/Resurrection are all recorded in Ancient Chinese documents. These documents record strange Celestial events in 4 BC and switch of Day/Night followed by Earthquakes and more strange Celestial Events in 31 AD.
Chinese written history is older than the deserts. Are you trying to say Christianity originated in China? Or are you playing that game where you connect the dots and call it a code? Have you studied Taoism or Buddhism? Do you realize that every religion has the same Golden rule? Do you really beleive that all of human history revolves around your faith? Because if you do, it's very egomaniacal and very wrong.
@@toddfordr8218 No, Christianity didn't exist until Jesus came in 4 BC. What I AM saying is that within the very Chinese Language characters themselves are the same accounts given in the Books of Moses. What I am saying is that Taoism and Buddhism didn't exist in China until around the Time of Christ. The Chinese People themselves practiced a form of Judaism, including Blood Sacrifice of spotless Sheep. Genetically, Chinese, Afghans, Jews, etc are all descendants of Shem and thus are "Semitic People". This is well recognized in Peer Reviewed Papers. What I am saying is that the Offical Chinese written documents record the dates of Jesus's Birth, Death and Resurrection.
You've probably heard this before, but in case you haven't: the name for Egypt in the languages in Kenya (both Nilote and Bantu, and also Swahili) is Misri. Misraim or Misreem is a plural, refering to the people of or descendants of Misri. (I was a Peace Corps volunteer in Kenya in the late '80's.)
First off it's know such thing as ancient Egyptians! Egyptians are not ancient.The ancient ancestors of KMT did not call themselves Egyptians and they did not call the land Egypt in ancient time. Correct yourself!
Love it. I will definitely be buying your book. I am sick of my son saying he comes from Monkey's. I keep saying to him you might come from monkey's but I come from Adams rib 😂
No if you read the bible you are (unless you are Jewish) you are part of the Genesis 1:23 folks....the folks that were in Nod. The one the Lord said go out and multiply.
Both haplotypes E1b1a and E1b1b populated ancient Egypt, but the return migrations to the interior of Africa were more related to E1b1a. Pharaoh Ramses III and his son Pentaweret are E1b1a.
Interesting presentation. One last thing has your data been verified by genetics experts or the International Federation of Human Genetics? If not, will you be presenting at the Feb 22-26, 14th International Congress of Human Genetics held in Cape, South Africa? Many experts will be very interested in your presentation.
THE ANCIENT EGYPTIANS ARE YORUBA RACE FROM WEST AFRICA. GO TO RUclips CHANNEL dark mattter1801 and watch who is messing with God. Also watch the infinity sign and Egyptology deepest blackhole undercover. Answers in Genesis is a liar.
His argument works like this: 1. Establish a Y-chromosome mutation rate based pedigree studies to calculate a Y-chromosome time to most recent common ancestor (TMRCA) approximately 4500 years ago. 2. Reinterpret the Y-chromosome phylogeny and chronology based on this earlier TMRCA. 3. Correlate historical events, like migrations, to nodes in the Y-chromosome phylogeny. 4. Overlay the Y-chromosome phylogeny onto the pedigree for Noah and his sons derived from Genesis. 5. Do (3) for Biblical events (e.g. the Flood, Babel, etc.) 6. Claim he rewrote the history of humanity and confirmed the AiG interpretation of Genesis.
There are, uh, significant problems with the case Jeanson makes.
The first, which underlies much of his analysis, is that he treats genealogy and phylogeny as interchangeable. They are not interchangeable. Genealogy is the history of individuals and familial relationships. Phylogeny is the evolutionary history of groups: populations, species, etc. A phylogenetic tree may superficially look like a family tree, but all those lines and branch points represent populations, not individuals. This is an extremely basic error.
There are additional problems with each step of the case he makes. In terms of calculating the Y-TMRCA, it’s nothing new: He uses single-generation pedigree-based mutation rates rather than long-term substitution rates. It’s the same error that invalidates his work calculating a 6000kya mitochondrial TMRCA. He even references a couple of studies that indicate the consensus date of 200-300kya for the Y-MRCA, but dismisses them as low-quality (he ignores that there are many, many more such studies). He is constrained in an extremely narrow timespan for much of the Y-chromosome branching due to its occurrence after the flood (~4500 years ago) and running up against well-documented, recorded human history (he ignores that Egyptian history spans the Flood). So he has to squeeze a ton of human history into half a millennium, at most. In correlating his revised node dates on the Y-chromosome phylogeny with historical events, he employs some really half-as…uh, amateurish “analysis”. Like, “the ancestral population for sister haplogroups existed along the line between the geographic homeland for the derived groups, and the descendants migrated in opposite directions” amateurish. I’m not exaggerating; this is how he explains how and where E1b1a and E1b1b descended from E1b1. He also just ignore inconvenient data that refute his model. Just straight up. Thanks to the crew on the Peaceful Science forum, my favorite example of this is R1b in Europe, and specifically Italy. Jeanson claims haplotype R1b arrived in Europe between 700 and 1400 CE, and specifically in Italy in the 14- or 1500s. Exceeeeeeeept…we have DNA from a stone age burial in northern Italy dated to about 14,000 years ago, and that individual was, you guessed it, R1b. Even if we take Jeanson’s YEC timeline at face value, a stone age specimen would be pretty close to the flood, about 4kya, which also directly invalidates his model. Moving on, the next step in his argument is to overlay the Y-chromosome phylogeny (now with incorrect new dates incorrectly correlated to historical events) with the pedigree of Noah and his sons and their descendants derived from Genesis. To do this, Jeanson egregiously acts as though a phylogenetic tree and a pedigree are interchangeable, treating nodes on the phylogeny as specific individuals rather than populations. And finally, he correlates the haplotypes on the phylogeny (now incorrectly overlayed with Noah’s family tree) with Biblical groups and events. That’s how Jeanson rewrites the history of humanity. That’s it. … It’s actually worse than that. Because he ignores Neanderthals. Neanderthals interbred with Homo sapiens. Most YECs have Neanderthals (and Denisovans) as descendants of Adam and Eve, and living post-flood. This means that Noah is also their Y-MRCA. The problem is that we have Neanderthal genomes, and their Y chromosomes are highly divergent. This necessarily pushes the MRCA back far beyond the YEC timeline, even using Jeanson’s incorrect mutation rates. How does Jeanson deal with this? He completely ignores it. Really. There are a grand total of three (3) mentions of Neanderthals in this book. At no point does Jeanson engage with the fact that Neanderthal genomics refutes the foundation of his argument - the recent Y-MRCA. So…that’s not great.
Dear Dr Nathaniel, thanks for gathering such enormous amounts of data and presenting it to us in a nut shell. Sadly, many people on earth do not share such joys of discovering the truths of the Bible but hate God without a cause.
Perhaps humanity should spend less time on arguing the vast ridiculousness of this physical universe and devote our lives to increased spiritual advancement. I think this is G-d’s intention when He CREATED us. The Kingdom lies within there is no doubt.
It is always a good thing to remember that people moved from Egypt (Misiri) in different directions. I have traced my ancestors from East Africa to Ancient Egypt during the Pharaohs period and based on the actual people with their names and their children. These people followed the bank of River Nile northwards. They never branched to West Africa at all. In 1998 AENEAS CHIGWEDERE, published a book called "The Roots of the Bantu" based on the archaeological findings and the Timbakutu Manuscript; his research work proved beyond doubt that there were three different period which he described as "Trinity", when people left Egypt and moved directly upwards following the River Nile. So, when talking about the "Bantu" people it is helpful to remember that some never crossed Africa to Nigeria and backward to Eastern part of Africa. In any-case the Bantu people's ancestor originated from Ethiopia to Egypt then moved northwards. Even presently, the language is slightly similar within the Bantu people who never moved to Nigeria, while those from Nigeria speak like a small group in East Africa called (Luos or Nilotes), and are mainly found in Northernern Uganda up to South Sudan, some in Kenya and Tanzania. Those from Nigeria are not Bantu but Nilotics. While the rest of present East Africa and southern Africa are mainly "Bantu". So, I am having a problem with the publication about DNA'S being factual of "Bantu"'s origin and movement.
This would explain the Tamil (Dravidian) linguistic cognates Bishop Caldwell reports from West Africa. The Andaman Islanders on the East of India look Bantu. They have been there for tens of thousands of years. The Sentinel Islands protected by India from colonisation. There are also Tamil tribal folks who look Australian.
52:25 About a year ago, I started tracing my ancestry, as far as it is available online, and you make an excellent point that researching my family history has brought home to me as well. The DNA testing you describe records only the direct male line of ancestry, and I would be surprised if any living human being isn't descended from all three of Noah's sons through this or that ancestral line. I have not yet tested my DNA to find out that aspect of my ancestry, and the documentary trail of my direct male line ancestors goes cold with my 6th great-grandfather, who immigrated to the US from Scotland in the late 1700s. Other branches of my family tree go back much farther, including a very speculative one all the way back through the kings of Israel and Judah to Adam and Eve that is supposedly based off of a genealogy created for King Clovis of the Franks, which I suspect was more propagandistic than historic in nature, as Clovis had recently converted to Christianity and would have wanted to link himself to Biblical kings to enhance his authority.
Did you get kinda embarrassed as a kid when you seen names like Charles the Bald or Pipin the short ? I sure wasn't enthusiastic to share those names with friends as a kid .I am though very proud of my lineage I come from very interesting families..my 6x grandfather was Myles Standish and Nicholas Holt ( little st.James) Andover helped stop the witch trials..Micha Rude who would have been burned for sure if he were born much earlier..
@@CrazyK64 I actually found names like Charles the Bald and Pepin the Short to be funny when I was a kid. Granted, that was long before I studied my family history and found out I was descended from them! Interestingly, our ancestors traveled to America together on the Mayflower and both signed the Mayflower Compact, as Elder William Brewster was my 12th great-grandfather on my mother's side, through 2 different lines. That was my only famous ancestor I knew about (after Noah and his family) until I started researching, and found that everyone alive today with European ancestry is supposedly descended from Charlemagne, son of Pepin the Short.
@@DamonNomad82 I have much of what was written about Myles by your grandfather..they had a mutual respect but I take it he wasn't to fond of Myles' brash Sense of humor or his stern approach to lawlessness. But when the colony come down with the fever and even after loosing his wife and child It was your grandfather and mine that did everything to save as many they could..they sloshed bedpans,cooked,bathed cleaned and rolled up their sleeves and did what needed to be done without complaint and your grandfather said that my grandfather was a fierce man of high standards for life and worked tirelessly to save the colony. He respected that.. Thank you for responding it is fascinating to me that we share some DNA and a history worth remembering...I wonder what our grandfather's would have to say about us being able to communicate so many years later. 🤔
Another thing whenever Ken had that debate with Bill Nye the science Guy Bill Nye kept asking do you have any science that you can predict do you have anything you can predict well now there has been plenty of things that have been predicted by creation scientists so why can't Ken and Bill Nye have another debate and this time bring those evidences into the debate?? Very good debate by the way, if u haven't seen it look it up.
'The eyes of the Lord keep watch over knowledge, but he overthrows the words of the traitor.' Proverbs 22:12 ESV 'Let all the earth fear the Lord; let all the inhabitants of the world stand in awe of him!' Psalm 33:8 ESV
THE ANCIENT EGYPTIANS ARE YORUBA RACE FROM WEST AFRICA. GO TO RUclips CHANNEL dark mattter1801 and watch who is messing with God. Also watch the infinity sign and Egyptology deepest blackhole undercover. Answers in Genesis is a liar........
Sumerian tablets, history of Enki tells a facinating history of the past. Explains much of what has been either forgotten or ignored. Definitely worth study .
The most important question is that: Researchrs need financial and investiment support, to a complet and satisfatory investigation, and that pass trough filter concerning decision controlers power, correspondent all sectors, sciency, entertnement, educacional, and others that a society may reach in a determined Time or Era.
Whoa, what an amazing discovery! Thank you for doing what you do. So blessed by your work... Pls keep it up. May the Lord continue to bless the work of your hands. 🙏🌈💜
Japhethites are the family of seven sons that was "enlarged". The Judaic lineages suffered a considerable amount of persecution and loss of the male lineages.
@@lostmusichits Benny, the Lord has not yet revealed these things to you. Perhaps you are still a child, spiritually speaking. Meat is not for babies. Clearly; you DO speak from a place of ignorance.
Actually, the pale Arabs may have a common ancestor to all Africans at some point in time, but they are not genetically closely related to the pyramid builders. The pyramid builders came from the south and went north. It's been scientifically proven. In all areas of science. At for tose who've seen the paintings and depictions on the walls, do they look like Arabs to you? Herodutus who was actually there at the time described the Egyptians, so too his contemporaries. If they were Arabs, they were definitely black Arabs. Don't fight with me, fight with the man who lived at that time. Claiming that the modern Arab Egyptians ancestors are the ancient ones just because they share some DNA with current Africans is like saying that the white french today are the direct decendents of the founders of the great British empire be ause they share a recent common ancestor. Like I said, according to herodutus if they were Arabs, they would have to be the black Arabs.
Are the ancient Egyptians related to modern Egyptians? No, the arabs who form the majority of Egpyt today are the descendants of "arab invaders" who captured it from the romans. When KEMET was invaded by foreigners the Afrikans were still living in KEMET even after the arab invaders displaced the roman invader. The Afrikans who live in "ancient egypt/KEMET are still living in egypt while some of the Afrikan population went further inwards into Afrika such as East & West Afrika and even further down south to places such as South Afrika.
Dr. Jeanson, this was a great video. I read and studied material from John D. Pilkey before the discovery of genetic tracing. I'm looking forward to ytour book.
My MSc is in evolution, I was a fervent defender of evolution and Darwin. Only, 4 years ago I changed all this, and after some investigation found out that evolution is NOT scientific talk.
I am totally blown away and you have connected many dots for me. I have had two DNA analyses by different companies according to their feedback I am 43% Nigeran(Yoruba) and 23% Sierra Leonian (Mende) 7%kenyian Luya 1%Maasai 5.2 Middle Eastern 9.1% Scandinavian 1.0% 2.9 Northwest European 1% Inuit (Eskimo)2%Meso.American(Peru).
It is interesting that the producer discounts data based on the Transatlantic Slave Trade but doesn't even mention the much worse slavery of the Muslim Arabs from 700CE to the present day.
On of the reasons for that is that the Arab slave trade almost always castrated the African men. As a result, there would be almost no Y chromosome trace of the Arab easterly slave trade because the African men in the Arab trade did not reproduce, unlike in the Atlantic slave trade where they did. His study is only looking at male lineage. Children of female African slaves in the Arab world would not be detectable in Y chromosome data and so don't come into his study.
What? I am arab and we have no slavery, Islam forbade that Europeans are those who die, especially in the Roman empire. Go ahead and mention a single one. You semse never heard story or bilal al habshi.
Dr. Jeanson, thank you for your mind blowing research. I have always wondered about the origins of the Egyptians, both modern and ancient and whether they were related to the Ancient Pharos and their subjects. I have known for a long time that the 25 Dynasty were Nubian but that they were ousted. So I don't what the immediate effect on the Egyptian population was during their reign or shortly afterwards. Did the invasion from Asia replace the original Egyptian peoples completely or did they intermingle? I was hoping that you would reveal more in this video about who the Egyptians were before the 25th Dynasty and where their descendants are today, if they survived at all? We have Tut's DNA don't we? Also that of Ramesses II and other Pharos. There are also mummies from their subjects. Commoners who made it to high office. And what relation do the Ancient Egyptians have from the first Dynasty to the 24th to each other and to modern Egyptians and even to other people groups? Is this something that you have researched?
The ancient Egyptians were Nubian, cushites, Israelites/Hebrews, Nilotes etc etc, when the invasions from Asia and Europeans came they inter-married of course, hence the modern day Egyptians and Northerners. They were whited out. But, many also escaped or migrated to other parts of Africa, they're still there to date. Many Africans don't take DNA tests, otherwise you'd be blown away by the findings.
@@teejayangel6638 علي اي دليل بتقولي قصتك العبيطه دي؟! هربوا ؟ لول شعب البانتو عايز يبني لنفسه قصه وهميه علي قد اي هم شعب كان عظيم ! ثم ازاي رمسيس التالت يطلع ع e1b1a وابوه رمسيس التاني طلع ع e1b1b اكيد ف غلط ف التحليل بس الاكيد مالهوش علاقه بالبانتو ثم اي حوار مافيش تحليل dna للمصريين المعاصرين دي ؟ لول ف كدا تحليل والاغلبيه العظمه ع e-m78 بنسبه 65% (e-v22 ,e-v12 )
@@teejayangel6638 lol tell that to the so called egyptians there now. they believe they're the original egyptians who built the pyramids even though we all know that isn't true.
If you just consider recent colonial history, you can see the fallacy of believing that modern Egyptians are the same people as the Ancient Egyptians. Are modern Americans in the United States the same population of Native Americans who lived here 700 years ago? The Native American population, unhappily, unfortunately, violently, and regrettably, has been for all intents and purposes displaced by Europeans and the descendants of Africans that they enslaved, along with the more recent immigrants from around the world. It would be ridiculous to say that the population of North America has always been what it is, what it looks like, today. This consideration applies even more so to the long trajectory of Egyptian history, especially considering the numerous invasions over millennia since the Pharaonic era.
This is faulty logic. European colonists committed genocide in America as we all know, which resulted in the disappearance of Native Americans. But there is no historical evidence that Arabs who invaded Egypt ever committed mass slaughter in Egypt. In fact, the history says otherwise. When Muslim delegation first arrived in Egypt, it was headed by an Arab Black man. The Egyptian ruler then took aside a member of the Muslim delegation and asked why Muslims had sent a Black man as their chief because Egyptians look down upon such people. Muslims said that their leader is the most educated and able among them, and that's why he was chosen by their Caliph.
@@QabilAGhor You don't have to slaughter a people to replace their population. Donald Trump's anti-immigrant policies today are grounded in fear that the low birth rate among US whites is leading to white population replacement due to the high birth rate of undocumented Latino immigrants living in the US. Population replacement takes place in many different ways.
I thought I was talking to myself. The DNA Trace, egyptology the Nigerians, native Americans the Atlantic slave trade, the sons of Noah, European, on and on and on. I really have no words to explain my enthusiasm.👍
It is weird how all the DNA tests always have "you are 2% Jew" but never about real ppl who existed for thousands of years and lived in a particular location.
It is political. If the DNA test shows that you are 2% Near Eastern/ Levantine ( could be Lebanese or Syrian) then some companies would show you as 2% Jewish.
@QabilAGhor I have a feeling it depends on who they are comparing to. It was an unregulated industry from day one to this day and just depends on who is running the show.
I am an Akan, Ghanaian descendent. The descendant line of the Egyptian Kings. If you matched my DNA to the King Pharaohs you might be surprised at the similarities. But the modern day “Egyptians” refuse the truth.
Please credit the Africans alil more. E1B1B as you highlighted have alot of African origins namely, Nilotic and Cushitic even silent Nubic - Berberic tribes Kenya and Cushiting, Nubia, and Berber Somalia, Sudan even South Sudan area, you're also forgetting the indigenous black African DNA of North African which include the Kemet or the Swahili name for Egypt (which is "Misri" whose origin comes from Misraim one of the sons of Ham I believe), Berber who do not identify with the Arabs though speak the language. The Cushites and Nubian are of dark skin origin not Arab origin. Punt is where Kenyan, Tanzania, into Mozambique, Uganda and Congo region who are the referenced "Bantu" hence "Punt" common "Bant"/"Punt" - "Ubuntu" where the B/P consonant sounds are confused with each other in the announciations which is absolutely E1B1A because of where migratory paterns are which could include neighboring regions with original boundaries. Having fun with it a little more "they" (in the North Eastern block) can't say "Bunt" they say "Bunt" lol
If there is such a correlation between Haplogroup E1b1b and the Moslem conquests, (1) Why is there not much of the E1b1b in Arabia and (2) Why is there so much of it outside the Arab caliphate at its greatest extent? E1b1b looks more like a North African haplogroupe that overflowed into Africa from Asia than the reverse.
If you look at original Ethiopians, they have a very distinct look. If you look at original Egyptians (especially Coptics and from the area of “upper Egypt”) they have a very distinct look. I wondered why this is, and upon reading the heritages in Genesis, Cush was a son of Ham, and Egypt was a son of Ham… and my mind=blown. This presentation actually gets several points right.
It is indeed. Modern and ancient Egyptians share the same genome, with a differential of no greater than 15%. You are verifiably the same people, despite the crazed community who desires the identity.
@@annemurphy9339 the drawings on the pyramid walls says otherwise, they depicts them as the true Africans. Those pyramid walls and it's drawings have there for thousands of years. The artefacts and drawings of Rameses and queen Tiye and her husband Amunhatap were African.
@@abigailnomsamndebele6351 Queen Tiye had long brown hair with blonde highlights that fell in soft waves. Afrocentrism mistakes the carving of her in a head cap - made of wood that has oxidized over the millennia - as her hair when it is a covering. There are photos of her very caucasoid hair online. The blood types and skulls of her parents are caucasoid. Egyptians represented themselves very differently than Nubians in their artworks: like most ancient caucasoid societies of the time, men were rendered a reddish-brown and women painted in the palest yellow. There are heavy brows - a caucasoid feature - with typically Middle Eastern almond-shaped eyes, aquiline noses, and lips may be either full or thin, but always in the caucasoid phenotype.
@@annemurphy9339 🤔🧐🤣🤣🤣🤣, you're delusional, europeans wants us to believe that a country in Africa before invasion had Caucasian from the caucus mountain, Wow 😭🤣🤣. You are truly a delusional, entitled, hateful, inhuman, naccistical pycopaths of a race. Going through so much length to dehumanise, discredit and hate Africans about their own history in their own continent, Wow. Your forefathers invaded Africa, stole, killed and destroyed just like the devil.
They say Egyptians were not black Africans but we find all ancient Egyptian culture , tradition and rituals all over African cultures today.
They lying
There is something called the Sahara desert. This served as a gene divider as they say. Those south of it decoupled the gene that causes darker skin, those north of it did for the one that caused lighter skin. Natural barriers lead to unique gene pool. The ancient Egyptians were not black Africans because there dna says they weren’t. The Sudanese south of Egypt, had many pyramids as well, which were black Africans who lived off the Nile, as any where else is desert. Ancient Egypt influenced them. Simple as that.
@@MarkSmith-vo1vn The Sahara didn't divide anything. Genetics has proven that the original North Africans were the Iberomaurusians and they were half black African. There goes your Sahara divide theory in the dustbin.
@@MarkSmith-vo1vnactually dna shows the ancient Egyptians were absolutely melanated
@@sheenamccarthy24yeah, nobody said they were white. We are saying they are not related to Central Africans.
There will be a lot of new 'species' due to cloning, Synthetic DNA, Ai and nano particle manipulation through 3D printing. We are back in the days of Noah
And mixing genes of animals with other animals, plants with other plants, and animals are plants. I guess they're called hybrids, like that's a good idea.
Thank you for bringing this up.
ITS ALREADY OUT THERE.
Yep. There are going to be a lot of designer babies.
If we are indeed in the days of Noah. There is nothing new under the sun.
Just keep in mind that we must respect Africa and it's people as well as all mankind. We all matter.
Agreed, but they must also EARN our respect. It's like money, if you give it for nothing it becomes worthless
Don't you think Africans are part of mankind?
Very true, but when this rhetoric is used to defuse the focus on a people group that is the perpetual target of disrespect, it becomes a way of reducing the effort of healing and unlearning that in necessary for the downtrodden to be raised to the level of equal respect you are describing. An inherent truth does not mean it is the current reality, but rather a goal that must be worked towards. If one person in a group of 5 gets slapped, and 3 of the 5 go to check on them saying they should not get slapped. And the remaining one says “nobody should get slapped. Well duh, but everyone hasn’t been slapped, they are checking on the individual that has been harmed. Hope that helps.
@@raijinenel3116earn respect? If any people that should be respected it would be Africans. They brought a lot into this world and no one would exist without them. Scientific fact. Most of us non Africans are even less human than they are because we have traces of Neanderthal dna. They have none
Confirms what scholars Dr Cheik Diop and Basil Davidson have told us about Kemet
E1b1b is african in origin.this nonesense
@@MoneyB-r2y what is nonsense with regards to my reference of the 2 scholars mentioned above ?
@@MCfact1827 not what you said.the auther is suggesting e1b1a1(e1b1b)orginated in asia.based on what evidence? And he suggested that they were olived skined Asians. When arabia is right on the equater line.not honest scholarship
@@MoneyB-r2y 👍... Yeah they always lie and twist history
@@MoneyB-r2y I think he said they were asian because he was eluding to that the west of africa hadnt been populated yet by the e1b1ba haplogroup prior to that. Since the creation of the suez canal arabia is considered in asia not africa, even though it sits on the african tectonic plate.
Please keep it up. I’m so excited about your research. Thank you for all you do!
Dr Jeanson, the fact that 80% of Somali males carry the E1b1b gene is not a coincidence.
It is a fact that kings and queens of ancient Egypt used to travel to Somalia.
They claimed that it was the land of their ancestors which they called the "Land of Gods" & the "Land of Punt" Similarities of the Somali language and that of the ancient Egypt is mind-blowing.
If you would like to come to Somalia to make further research, I would be happy invite you and be my guest.
Actually, the land of their ancestors is the beginning of the Nile/Great Lakes region.
@@jubilee203
You’re both right actually because in those days there were no imaginary borders like they are now, so the great lakes region could’ve included Somalia as well.
@@jubilee203
Or more than likely some tribes from the Great Lakes region migrated and settled where Somalia is now, while other tribes moved up the Nile towards Ethiopia, Nubia and Kemet.
Don't buy this revisionist rubbish.
Either the few Kings of Egypt travelled to Somalia and impregnated several hundred or thousand women around the Somalia region or 80% of all modern Somalians are descended from one line.
Or the Kings themselves originated from somewhere in East or North East Africa.
Seriously. Use your common sense. Which is more likely?
@@tgr5772 This is jot just blind belief. The facts are there. When queen Hatsepshut travelled to the land of Punt, she met King Parehu & Queen Hatie ( Baraxow & Xadiyo) two known personalities in Somalia
Nothing is more commendable, than finding someone, who is seeking the Truth...totally unbiased. Unbiased Truth...is certainly a "Godly" act. To go where the Truth leads...regardless of one's "feelings", is what all should strive for. It is refreshing to find a scholar who seems to be doing just that.
💯 if the truth hurts, then it hurts but it is also joyous to have truth. We know from God we can trust truth.
He has scewed his data by not checking the Americas
The lecture was exhilarating,surely _however Mr.Jeanson's humility, in the face of discovering how The Bible ultimately proves itself, was absolutely wonderful to behold and added an element of - Look up & Rejoice - while we watched in awe! Thank you everso much!
This does not prove anything about biblical origins at all. What this does is make huge assumptions. The very fact he is starting at the end (ie modern times) creates a systemic flaw in his backwards tracing. Let me give you an example. Take modern Jews, he is looking at the biblical line taking the modern Jewish data and walking that backwards to his believed biblical beginning. The problem with this method is that it is all based on the assumption that modern Jews are in fact direct descendants of Jacob and there by Abraham. What if modern Jews are not actually descendants of Jacob. So what he has done is in fact traced modern Jewish people back to a certain group which can neither be confirmed or denied to be of a particular son of Noah. His whole assertion that that group in ancient history is any given son of Noah is solely based on a modern understanding of who that group is today. For example Libyans are from this Son of Noah so if I take modern Libyans DNA and go backwards I need to end up and assign them to this Son of Noah. This can also be said about any other group he is walking backwards Egyptians Libyans Europeans etc etc. What this data shows and not surprisingly at all is that we all eventually end up back in the area around Africa Asia Europe intersection. Which Mitochondrial DNA puts at about 250,000 years ago not 6,000 years ago. We know that at one point Humans were as few as 1,000 people but that time is far earlier than 4500 years ago. He is using DNA to try and prove a Biblical "correctness" but to do so you have to ignore all of the other DNA evidence that denies the time frame and the origins of various groups etc etc.
@@stepheng905 " ... you have to ignore all of the other DNA evidence that denies the time frame and the origins of various groups etc etc."
What other DNA evidence?
@@l.m.892 There are dozens of study's that show there was a population bottle neck of as few as 1,000 breeding pairs some where around 60,000 years ago if you take a mean statistical point in the estimates. The latest being about 35,000 years ago and the earliest being about 100,000 years ago. Any of the dates shows at least 2,000 adult humans tens of thousands of years before "Adam and Eve" let alone Noah and his sons. Mitochondrial DNA shows that "Eve" was some 300,000 years ago. The list of studies is really quite endless.
Ezekiel 29 tells us all we need to knw about modern Egypt. About ancient; well the fact that mizraim and cush were brothers. No Arabs nor Caucasian mentioned
@@l.m.892 Mitochondrial DNA has the "Eve at 200,000 plus years ago. We know at one point about 50,000 years ago there were less than 10,000 Humans. Either way both dates are much older than 6,000 years. Never mind what DNA is telling us about where certain groups come from and even more importantly where they do not come from
Thanks for your reports about human ancestral history, I would recommend if want talk about this topic to sit and talk with the native people you are talking about, I am glad we are talking about His-Story not ours. Kushitic people deserve to talk about their knowledge before DNA. More over modern Egyptian are mixed race and they don't like to be considered African. Thank you.
They are Arabic not African
i'm a european i carry 7 % coptic egyptian dna and most of south french do and iberians too, egyptians hittites cannanites still well alive
They're mostly from Greek, Turkey and Armenia..
It’s a good thing that you have dispelled the myth that E1b1a has always been in west Africa but there are some geneticists that believe that the E group originated in the Levant which is really North East Africa. E1b1a is the nemesis because it does not really fit within the Cushitic bloodlines so I don’t agree that E1b1a is a Hamitic bloodline and I also don’t agree with the placing of Japhetic bloodlines under Shem. More research is definitely needed here!
E1B1A is the blood of Israel IE Shemites E1B1B is the blood of Ham ie cush. Shalom
@@benyahudadavidl Your fake you are beta we are A
@@benyahudadavidl Yes…..Kham (Ham) and Shem often mixed in ancient times.
@@benyahudadavidlE1B1b is more indigenous Arabs, such as Ishmaelite, Joktanites not Hamites. Hamites are more A and B lineages. But spot on about E1b1a being Israel
😮Are the dominoes beginning to fall?!! I see "BLACK" Israelites who were in Egypt who dispersed to "beyond the rivers of Ethiopia"... and I see the Greek and Roman invasion into Hamitic Mizraim... surely our fathers have inherited lies - white Christians (not excluding other nations). It's also funny how a certain "ish" news organization revealed Canaanite blood in "Palestine" area today 🤔hmmm....
What happened in South Africa is a tropical example of what happened in Israel and Egypt
If what happened in South Africa was the time of war and battle,black south Africa wouldn't have gotten their land back, just as black Israel and Egyptian were unable to retrieve their land back from the white invader, there is no way you can hide the truth.
SOuth Africa is the new Egypt
@@tegaolayemicredo462 the majority of South Africans are still black and brown though
@tegaolayemicredo462 no. There is not apartheid in Israel. That idea is illogical relative to the facts. Ask any South Afrikaner... they will all tell you that's crazy... Israel does not qualify in any way, by definition, as an apartheid state.
😅😆🤣😂😅😂🤣😅🤣😂
Fascinating. So long as science pursues truth, it will line up Biblically.
@@kateescarlet9693, What evidence do you have to support your claims? What example can be used to discredit the cliam the person in this post is suggesting and one in the video? What of this video can be refuted by scientific research? I couldn't find information on the DUCK therory on a Google search. Where did you find out about this therory and where can I go to find out more information? What does this therory states?
Everytime!
@@michaelcarter7079 There's no point don't cast pearls to the swine!
@@NewLifeFromTheWayofTruth? Not understanding post. Can you phrase comment so I know what your talking about.
@@kateescarlet9693 ... Everything?
If you’re sincere about replacing the Darwin perspective you will need to confront the anti Black narrative of the early writers envolvement in race science and eugenics. All who wrote that indigenous Black inhabitants could not have created advanced civilizations like Egypt. Also it’s creation can’t be attributed to Arabs who invaded Egypt 32 dynasties after its creation and installed a completely different culture.
Once you start down the road to disproving ideas/narratives, you will be doing it forever. It is better to present the evidence and let it stand. The former looks like you have an axe to grind; the latter I'd a position to advocate.
Lol egyptians not black africans not arabs not white peoples. please study peoples of the world. Facts are facts whether u like them or not. Egyptians never black.
Telling the historical truth is NOT " an axe to grind " .
Your type of " An axe to grind " is a subjective perspective .
If Jews spoke about the monster that is evil Nazism , will you make a false accusation against them of " having an axe to grind " ?
@@wodemaya7899 False equivalence.
Patrick Lyons -
Streets that follow like a tedious argument
Of insidious intent
To lead you to an overwhelming question ...
Oh, do not ask, “What is it?”
Let us go and make our visit.
I agree with the conclusions reached that the ancestor to E1b1a and E1b1b, identified as (E1b1), originated in North East Africa possibly where the Aksum kingdom was located. And, It is plausible that around 700 - 400 BC a split took place between the two Y DNA lineages based on the creationist timeline. It’s ironic that were it not for the E1b1b connection to E1b1a, the world would have thought that E1b1b was of West Asian origin instead of African origin as noted at 43:59 in the video. In modern times, E1b1a is showing up in the DNA of Egyptian pharaohs like Ramses III. This means E1b1a (the same Haplogroup I have as an African American) was significantly present in ancient Egyptian DNA. It can’t be ruled out that E1b1a migrated to West Africa from Egypt. And, it’s possible that E1b1 originated in the Levant instead of the Horn of Africa. After all, the ancient Natufians of the Levant carried haplogroup E. Ancient maps referred to the Levant and southern Arabia as north east Africa or the land of Ham. Either way, E YDNA is an African lineage to which I am proud to belong.
Exactly!!
I am also descendant of Ramses III. 65% of African Americans are descendants. The Ancient Egyptians were black and they are us! We are the Royal ones!
@@NubianGoddess15 agreed.
Shalom Family, they were Israelites.
His research is based on the European view on Bantu history. The African view is a migration from the middle east. This makes both E1b1* rooted in the same place in the middle east.
Another problem with this video and creationist views is that they still use the evolutionist view of history. The Biblical view state the Ark landed at Mt Ararat. So ALL peoples MUST have a common point of origin. This fact makes his DNA tree as to who Shem, Ham and Japheth is complete nonsense.
Thank you Dr. Jeanson your elaborate and scientifically based explanation is the start of a long rehabilitation and reconstruction process of African, more so Kemitic history. As an original and indigenous Sudanese (The Bari: Eastern Nilotic of ancient Nubia now Sudan) and after comparing cognates, religious practices and now your testimony on ancient haplogroups, this indeed is a reaffirmation of the African/Kemitic origins of one of the world's greatest civilisations."Truth is like death after life, it sure will come". Old kemetic saying. The ancestors are watching
The thing is people will find something wrong with his study as well..im not sure why they are so convinced that they were somehow European or Middle Eastern when it has been proven that even the so called Middle Eastern people are a branch if Black Africans who went in that land and geography intervened and changed their appearance. So yes even they started off Black African..They all did prior to physical changes..plus how they believe they were European when at that time science tells us that Europeans in the modern sense were what they looked like today..But yet they will still hold on to racist views to what is obvious but they have a right to believe what they want even if it's not true..Plus they painted themselves as they saw themselves and they were Black African but because these people have a view of Black Africa as 1 type never minded that Black people come in a variety of shades and brown is one of them..They show paintings of them staying Nubians to try and prove a point but in those painting they are represented as the same color in some but they don't show you the other side of that same box in Tuts tomb that depict him saying those of the Levant and Asiatics and in NONE of them are they depicted the same color but they won't show that part..They show them as having white skin for men and women..Thats the way they saw them..But if they were the same color as them then they would paint them the same color as them which they did not..So it's evident they knew what colors to use but on their paintings they really do depict some Nubians the same color as them..Explain their insight on why that is cause that doesn't make sense but one thing you won't see is them showing that picture and the reason is because they can't explain that away..They started off Black African and eventually mixed over time to what we see today..In Max Planck study they didn't test those in the south like Aswan because they knew what they would find..Why would you do a so called DNA test but not include everyone in the region unless you knew what the results would show..that was purposely done to play with those thay want those results so bad and when they were called out ok it they had to come clean as far as their techniques..That completely discredited the results and that is why it is not excepted..Couldn't stand uo to peer review amd you should look at what these other scientists wrote. Some were just straight up upset they would put out bad info but we know why..So before you try to use that study read the whole thing cause you'll just be embarrassing yourself..Be blessed all my brothers and sisters and search for truth and always be unbias amd you'll find it..peace up..
hahah Ancient Egyptians are all Caucasians.
The Bari: Eatern?. So Bari is East?. The word "Bari" is also Somali word of the east.
@@dreamdiction That is why the paint themselves black and say that that they are from the Mountains of the Moon, which ia locate South of the Sahara, between tanzania and Uganda. That is why the language is similar to thw Wolofe people in Senegal, West Africa. That is why they orientate themselves to the south the interior of Africa instead of North. Yea right!
@@lindsaywaterman2010 There are over a hundred anatomical differences between Negroid and Caucasian races. For example, the negroid skull is DOUBLE the thickness of the Caucasian skull, negroid arms are three inches longer than Caucasian arms, the anatomical differences between Negroid and Caucasian skeletons are so obvious that even an untrained child can separate them. Embalming was the standard method of burial for ancient Egyptians of all social classes, tens of thousands of ancient Egyptian mummys have been examined and they are all Caucasian.
Hey 🍵 Kids,This is Fascinating,❤😮😢😂😅😊🎉❤.
This video strong along forever without telling us anything about where theEgyptian DNA came from are who has the DNA now. A complete waste of time!
The ancient Egyptian considered their ancestral home as Land of Punt current Somalia 🇸🇴 And the language culture and looks are very similar!
Ancient HAMIT land of origin was from 4502-900bc was in south Asia(india) and southeast Asia. ALL brown or black peoples. With migrations to (northeast Africa) from 4212-1000bc. FACT!
Africa is settled by NOD peoples 17,000bc- AD2024 from the ,*EDEN realm. Just like the HAWILAH(Americas), KUSH (Australia), AZZUHR (pre-Eurasians). All before the worldwide flood events of 4502bc, the latter Bronze Age wars 2400-1000bc, and the Euro colonialism AD1400s-1900s. FINALLY THE TRUTH!
Africa is the garden of eden.
The middle east was once part of Africa.
Ham himself was black, as were his offspring.
The cradle of civilization is Africa.
The Arabs themselves came from black Africa.
True look at the Egyptian statues look at Somalians it’s open evidence. The 1st so-called historians couldn’t comprehend black Africans were capable of such achievements so they separated Egypt from the rest of Africa. Egypt is a country by the Nile meaning various tribes n peoples moved to avoid desertification of the Sahara
Yes, but Egyptian kings and queens conquered Punt in Yemen
What I take for this is we are all connected. What a wonderful time to be alive. We are all brothers and sisters. ❤️❤️❤️❤️
We are not all brothers and sisters. Only those in Christ will be brothers and sisters, and the rest will perish.
Stop lying. As an Israelite I can assure you that we have no friends. Socalled nonblack people are not our brothers and sisters. They are hybrids ie sapiens neanderthal ie not naturally occurring. Shalom
Christ is a way to enslave those with no mind... @@JesusistheonetrueGod
Kemet = black
Great distinction between modern and ancient Egyptians!
Hi, I went to the museum in Cairo and saw in glass cases multiple mummified Pharaohs. Why not compare the DNA taken from some of those (dating back a couple of millennia BC) to the Egyptians of today?
They are afraid to let it be known because they know their DNA will not match with the ancient ones.
It's been done. King Tut was European and that has caused the anti-white people to blow a gasket.
@@rohayeha Over the last 5000 years populations around the eastern Mediterranean and the Middle East have mixed a lot and this is readily apparent in the DNA.
DNA analysis has in fact been done of ancient Egyptian mummies from various periods, with results that match these population movements. Modern Egyptians also show DNA overlaps consistent with the population movements of the last 2000 years as well.
This information is all readily available with a quick Google search leading to articles in journals like Science.
@@rohayeha - Egypt was conquered by the Greeks in 322 BC, by the Romans in 30 BC and later by the Ottomans in-the 7th century AD. The Egyptian of today is not the original Egyptian, but Arab. Mizraim, son of Ham was the Father of the Egyptian. The Copt of Egypt is a descent of the original Egyptian of the Pharaohs.
@@masada2828 No doubt the Copts are descendents who also got mixed otherwise there is no logic in saying that in the middle of a desert in Africa a white skinned race evolved naturally. If the ancient Egyptians were migrants then the first people to reach Egypt will also be Africans
This is fascinating. I am Scandinavian in appearance but I have northern African, western African and Nigerian genetic as well. Yet I am very pale white with blond curly hair. This all makes sense to me now. Please keep unraveling the fabric of the Mystery of the History of Humanity. Well done.
I am doubting you, but curly hair is normal in germanic populations
@@guilalves them you doubt genetic science all together.
That makes you a white skin Black man, welcome home brotha ! Lol!
😂🤣😅😆
What's up brother!
The TRUTH shall be revealed in these END TIMES
The truth was already revealed john3:16
Already is.❤
@@Mrbigglesworth777The Bible is a Late Late story, which true origins came out of Ancient Kemet, called Egypt by the greeks
@@Evidence1Only1
It was called 'Aigiptos' by the Greeks, deriving from the indigenous name of a temple in the country: He-Ku-Ptah
In de course of time in developed into ne name Egypt
yes it will because turkey was the landing spot of noah and the restart ofthe human race and when do enogh family reseach like i have all back to garden of eden then you will know the truth
Hello! There is history written in 1905 at South Africa the document is called the short history of the native tribes of the Transvaal. The history is about the people who stayed in South Africa then,it includes the Bantu who travelled from north Africa to Southern Africa. Some of the groups written about are Batswana called Bakwena ba Bafokeng. It is stated their oral history shows that they came from Ethiopia, passed by Egypt and crossed Sahara desert when they travelled to Southern Africa. Today some Batswana (some people of Botswana) say they originate from Egypt. There is one research done on genes of children in Botswana,the research found that thier genes were similar to genes of Luhyia people of Kenya. These Luhyia are said to originate from Egypt.
True
😂😂😂😂, came from Ethiopia then passed by Egypt then crossed the sahara desert then went down to south Africa without carriages or horses. Call Guinness records
@@Sema-Tawy camels have been used to cross the desert for thousands of years.
@@charmingyoutuber2408 No camels were known in the Arabian desert not the African, they were only introduced to Africa through Arabian caravans since 800 bc and were used in Africa from 200 AD mainly in the eastern and northeast Mediterranean Africa and much later to West or South Africa. So Again from Arabia to the East and the North, not from South and West to the North East
@@Sema-Tawy I hear you. What time period were the people in the OC migrating through? Your timeline for camels still leaves over 2000 *known* years of travel with them.
41:33 there is lots of evidence that shows that just a few thousand years ago or less, the Sahara region was green with multiple rivers.
Thing about your video, you seem to be guessing, when you say e1b1b and e1b1a seems to be in the same area at one time, but you don't know where, have you considered that this place is Egypt? during the time of Israel's slavery? your guessing is way off, you should do more historical study, If you read Josephus writings, he was a first century historian. it could help you a lot.
Although I am a proud descendant of Africa, I have three grandparents who were either half or part Native American. However, only one of them was from the Indigenous list in your video. My maternal grandmother was half Choctaw, but she had bluish gray eyes.
Her blue eyes passed down to my daughter and one of my cousins at birth. At birth, meaning they were only born with blue eyes. My daughter's eyes were dark blue and my cousins eyes were light blue, but they now have green eyes as their eyes changed as they grew up from blue to green along with another cousin who was born with green eyes.
One of my cousins and I were born with blonde hair which passed down to my daughter. Now, I have reddish-brown hair, but my cousin's blonde hair turned black, and my other cousin was born with and still has red hair. We Black Americans never know what our kids will look like as we are a mixed group.
Our slave ancestors were the first Mulatto group born to slaves and their white masters. Moreover, the mixture continued until many of our ancestors began to look white. It was after slavery was abolished and our Mulatto ancestors married African or Black American spouses and bore children with them that we finally started to look more like our African ancestors.
please study quite a few more Answers in Genesis videos, moreover their books, and in a nutshell realize there is only one human race. Being "proud descendant of Africa" may seem fashionable (as in the preponderance of questionalbe BLM activities) however your mention of eye & hair colors indicate something other than African OR native american descent, such as north european (viking) genes. In addition your choice of "white masters" is inaccurate and perhaps intentionally offensive, since the African tribes themselves sold their neighbors not only to "white" buyers but predominantly central & south America. If you have been watching more videos in this series, and checking other sources, you would know that the great majority of slaves were bought by South American "bipoc" owners. In fact in 2023 there are even more BIPOC slaves on this planet than ever have been before, many are children mining elements required for cell phones and EV's. Finally, The goal is not to "look more like" anything other than... to BE more like Christ, mere "looks" are deceiving....as MLK advised-- don't judge people (including yourself) by your skin (eye) color, but by the content of your character, and this is what Jesus in fact will do. Please take this comment to heart, and be part of an inclusive one-race, the human race, ignoring skin/eye/hair color, get back to what really matters-- love for ALL no matter where they come from, and rewarding actual achievements no matter what the ethnicity.
@@cherylanon5791 Why don't you learn reading comprehension skills? Then you will comprehend that my comment is not about her series or other videos, it is to corroborate with her title and something she said in this particular video using my own life experiences. I do not sit around just watching videos; I am too busy for that in addition to how much I cannot stand self-appointed ignorant people who incorrectly correct other people.
I usually ignore ignorance, but I felt compelled to respond to your circumlocutory, protracted ignorance. I am an educator with several college degrees and graduate degrees. Some of those degrees are in Educational Science and Research. Educators and professional researchers are lifetime learners through research studies.
However, this is not a classroom or a research lab, it is a comment section where people can comment on any part of what the content creator says that resonates with them as well as socialize, hence the term social media.
Apropos, my comment was meant for the content creator, it was not addressed to you. When you mind your own business and keep your nose out of other people's business, no one will know how ignorant you are.
@@GailBecker-MSED-CM-Author I think what she was trying get at is that most of the world is tired of any sentence that starts off with "I'm a proud descendant of Africa" ... all everyone hears is Pride this, and Pride that... I think for once it would be nice if black people, or anyone for that matter, tried practicing humility instead of pride. It would be nice to see that. Just once.
@@derekmunson3695 Then I suggest that when you hear it or see it, don't listen or read it. Just ignore it and move on because you only know what you are tired of! You do not know what most of the world knows or feel, only GOD knows that.
Moreover, I will say and write what is in my heart. No one is going to tell me not to be proud of my African heritage. You could have kept that surreptitious racist epithet to yourself!
You know nothing about me, but what I do know is that when someone makes an accusation about a stranger without knowing anything about her (especially never having met), it usually means that is who he is.
Sometimes, it is wise to mind your own business, especially when the comment is not addressed to you. That, apropos, is humility!
I’m proud of my Germanic heritage. I’m also proud to be an American. But Biblically we are one family. All distant cousins. Now we are proving the biblical texts are true through genetic evidence. It’s ok to be proud of where you came from but never stop learning.
Ps college degrees mean nothing to me.
It was about time with this breakthrough in the history of ideology and the "eyeopening per excellence"! You did it! This will stir up and calm down simultaneously - exactly what was needed. You will be mentioned, remembered, referred to and used as a tool in the process of human development.
😅😂😅
@@kateescarlet9693 CUTE! Typical atheist reply. Empty ridicule without dealing with the science behind it. It's so predictable.
I truly appreciate this presentation from someone credible. The explanations make sense by answering those ambiguous teachings children learned in school, and the questions these kids asked about the Bible.
@@midlander4 Do you know the common denominator of 13 and 458?
This is the number of years since you joined, and the number of views you've had in those years. You're the common denominator! Now you have something legitimate to laugh at.
I don't trust your research, the Kemetyu are the descendants of Anu the diminutive people who built the High Culture/Civilization of the Hapi/Nile Valley. They tell you where their Ancestors came from, " the foothills of the mountain of the Moon Kilimanjaro". The euraisans are not the people who built the Culture and Spirituality of Ta-Marri, it was the Anu who built Ta-Seti and Ta-Hehesi. From the beginning of the Nile Valley Civilization in Afrika, it was Afrikans and their Culture, Language and Spirituality that shows it is an Afrikan Civilization. In the Language it shows that they used what they saw to name and use in their vernacular and speech, no euraisan would use anything that is not in their environment to incorporate into their language because they would have never saw it so how would they be able to identify a vegetable or fruit and they never seen it. It is an Afrikan Civilization.
Mountain of the moon is rwenzori mountain
@@derickthomas1013 Not one single evidence shows what you say . This “ they came from the mountains of moon “ was invented by hotebs in black communities and has 0 evidence.
@@agathattg5fkwagala499 there are two mountains of the moon
Genes dont lie. Whatever their genes were, that is what they were. Just look at their genes, there are mummies.
I don’t trust your opinions either. Because you use the past tense incorrectly. Not never saw it. Never SEEN it. And not they never seen it. Never SAW it. If you murder the English language who knows what you’ve done with your ‘history?’
Amazing lecture ... so informative. Thank you very much !
This is excellent research and it answers a lot of questions for me. I'm a Afro Descedant/Afro-American. I have traced my family lineages and found living relatives in west and central Africa. When I received my results from 23 and me my Y Dna showed up as E-M4451 which is in the family of E1b1a and it shows I'm connected to the Pharaoh Rameses the III EV38. In west African history there are many oral stories about Egyptian migration to that area.
we wuz kangz!!
@@suite701 grow up
@@suite701 We are kings. You need to work on your English my non king.
@@suite701 Yes and your DNA derive from a long line of hate, which debunks all of this mumbo jumbo...
E1B1A Y Haplogroup is the lineage of Jacob. The original genetic children of Jacob called Israel it is also documented with credible nonsensical sources of scholarship. But each person has to determine the truth of any evidence presented as factual.
This is wonderful work! I have been so disappointed the way Christians have capitulated to mainstream science by also selling out the Bible. I have known if God let evolution take over his creation he would have said so. Also these ridiculous dates science comes up with while dating artifacts and geology are just all over the place and given a little prodding doesn't stand up.
As someone with mostly Nordic lineage with a lot of family with middle Eastern appearance your lecture definitely hits home.
What happened with Ishmael and his 12 sons? Wouldn't they be the Arabs?
Carbon dating is not "all over the place". Isotopes give a pretty accurate date, with + or - range. Did you take chemistry or geology? Rigorous science.
What the heck is "mainstream science"? Geology, physics, chemistry, biology, if these interfere with your religion I gotta say there must be superstition in the mix.
@@jaytrey7807 Ishmael was Abraham's son with Hagar who was Egyptian (which is interesting)
@@jaytrey7807who can prove ish0mael
FYI, Abraham had other sons besides the two. Gen. 25:1-6 Abraham had taken another wife, whose name was Keturah. 2 She bore him Zimran, Jokshan, Medan, Midian, Ishbak and Shuah. 3 Jokshan was the father of Sheba and Dedan; the descendants of Dedan were the Ashurites, the Letushites and the Leummites. 4 The sons of Midian were Ephah, Epher, Hanok, Abida and Eldaah. All these were descendants of Keturah.
5 Abraham left everything he owned to Isaac. 6 But while he was still living, he gave gifts to the sons of his concubines and sent them away from his son Isaac to the land of the east.
Exactly! This does not line up w other research.
Keturah was another name for Hagar....the children were given (spiritual) gifts and sent to the East.
Source?
Noah was far before Abraham.
Egypt was already at it's high when Abraham was born.
@@bookmouse2719 I don't think so. He sent Hagar(the EGYPTIAN!) away BEFORE Sarah died. AFTER Sarah died he married a woman by the name of Keturah. A DIFFERENT WOMAN. By the way, Since Hagar was Egyptian & she got an Egyptian wife for her Son Ishmael; it's a revelation that ISHMAEL-and HIS offspring were 75% HAMITIC, 25% SEMITIC. With that information it is more accurate to assess-for those who believe the original Hebrews were "black"-I'd say.....THEY HAVE THE WRONG SON! Think about it😉😏✌️
Thank you for touching on the Bantu people, our history gets blurred after 300 or so years, but I enjoyed your analysis. It is in line with some of the theories on Bantu migration.
What are some theories on bantu migration. I heard they came out of Asia.
The Bantu are the ancient Semitic peoples of the Israelites
The history of the Bantu is blurred because there is a big cover up of the truth. Even this research is covering up the truth by keeping Haplogroup E’s origins out of the Levant which is really North Africa. He is giving our history to some European white folks.
@@Cizzlemanestop that non sense
@@josephkiwale374 what am I stopping?
Just read through Genesis and Exodus yesterday --- this video shows up this morning.
It seems you left out the Biggest Depopulation Event in Africa which is the Sub-Saharan Slave Trade and the Indian Ocean Slave Trade. Arabs and Berbers had many Concubines of Africans enslaved. Many of their Sons did the same thing. You should factor this in. Just trying to Help
Faut savoir que le MOT ESCLAVE signifie celui qui est dominé par quelqu'un ou quelque chose, DONC tu peux être esclave des cigarettes, de téléphone, de la télé, , d'alcool, de la vie de debauche, le sexe, de critique, de sorcellerie, la jalousie, du manger, d'orgueil, de colère....DONC tout le monde est esclave de quelque chose. Voir le dictionnaire. Allô salut bonjour coucou!!!🤣
Im a somali, that makes me E1B1B L3. One of the oldest lineages that still exists in its ancient states. Older than arabs and the rest of them. Our language is only spoken and not written. We never migrated nor we mixed, which makes us genetically original till this day. If you really want to see and know the cradle of humanity. Then go to Somalia. And by the way, these are new findings and confirmed by modern science. Loved this video. By the way, 99% of somalis dont even know this due it being found recently due to DNA advancing
Finally, Truth in Science, how refreshing, keep up the excellent work!
I’ve read up on this so many times that it bores me but kind of excited that someone else has researched this at the same time. Good source also
Science will keep on exposing all the lies of the past!
I made a dna study on my brothers' dna and it came out to be 30, 000 years old from Arabia (Sumerian) and my mother's from Sudan 15,000 years ago both migrated to the west Europe, Spain and England, then to France and finally to Scandinavia.
👏 WOW 👏
You say "it came out to be 30,000 years ago".
Who told you this?
How did they know?
Do you believe them?
What evidence have you seen that convinced you?
@@andynoble8590 My dad was haplogroup I1 (Sumeria) my mom was T ( N Egypt). B
Yes I believe them, Both looked unlike most Finns , dark and reddish hair, both were interested in Egypt and Arabian countries and art. My mom looked like the Russian Emperor Nicolai II. My dad looked like the UK royality in Australia. They told me I have lots of relatuves in UK.
My parents never knew their origin, but both acted unlike many Finns. They traveled a lot. My mother was an painter and had made unusually extravagant clothes and she looked egyptian. My dad traveled a lot. They spoke fluently various languages. They did things Finns rarely do. They felt often that they did not belong here. It made a lot of sense to me when I heard their genetic origins.
Hi from Egypt 🇪🇬🇪🇬
What do u want to say?
@@joh99954j
Are you Egyptian - you do know that the land your born in doesn't determine your ethnicity
@@proverbs2818 yes
@@joh99954j
"FUTURE" PROPHECIES FOR EGYPT
👇
(Isaiah 45:14) Thus saith the Lord, The LABOUR OF "EGYPT" and merchandise of Ethiopia and of the Sabeans, men of stature, shall come over unto thee, and THEY shall be THINE: they shall come after thee "IN CHAINS" they shall come over, and they shall FALL DOWN UNTO THEE, they shall make supplication unto THEE, saying, Surely God is in thee; and there is none else, there is no God.
(Zechariah 14:16-18) And it shall come to pass, that every one that is left of all the nations which CAME AGAINST Jerusalem shall even go up from year to year to worship the King, the Lord of hosts, and to keep the feast of tabernacles And it shall be, that whoso will NOT come up of all the families of the earth unto Jerusalem to worship the King, the Lord of hosts, even upon THEM shall be no rain And if the family of "EGYPT" go not up, and come not, that have no rain; there shall be the PLAGUE, wherewith the Lord will SMITE the HEATHEN that come not up to keep the feast of tabernacles
(Joel 3:19) "EGYPT" shall be a DESOLATION, and ED-OM shall be a desolate wilderness, for the VIOLENCE AGAINST the children of JUDAH, because they have SHED innocent BLOOD in their land
@@proverbs2818 i will be at heaven when that happens
I've had the book "Traced" prior to viewing this video and have gone through it, it is amazing. This video has renewed my interest in studying history, origins etc.
THANK YOU FOR ALL THIS TRUTH, THE CHILDREN OF THE KINGDOM IF KEMET BLESS YOU FOR THE TRUTH❤️🌍🌞🌍❤️
I urge everyone to get this book. It was a fascinating read, and it put me in awe of god even more.
Is it harder or easier to understand that this presentation?
Congratulations, Dr. Jeanson !
I've been waiting for my copy to arrive, only to be informed it's first printing sold out.
I am now waiting til July.
Congratulations 🎉 again
Same. But I did receive his first book and have been studying it thoroughly. Absolutely fascinating stuff.
كلامه صحيح تاريخيا وعلميا
بالمرصاد على المزورين التاريخ والجينات البشرية في العالم
الدليل كلامه صحيح جميع رفاة j1_M267 وE
في إيران اكثر من 10000الف سنة
السلالة Eمن أصول نيجيريا في إيران وجودهم اكثر من 10000الف سنة
j1_M267
وجودهم في إيران اكثر من 10000الف سنة
البروفسور ناثانيال ت.جينسون كلامه صحيح تاريخيا وعلميا بالمرصاد على كل كذاب اشر في العالم
@@awokecon157 I ordered 8 April, it arrived today.👍🏼
Thank you for spreading light and truth.
Praise the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ ! Thank you for your diligence and commitment to Gods words and seeking and saving the lost .
The blind leading the blind
what does Jesus have to do with anything
E1b1 was in the entirety of North Africa during the holocene(Green Sahara) . Tasilli N Ajjer art work and the Uan Muhuggiag mummy prove this. Kemet was the child of proto east and west/central Africans. This is reflected in the DNA of the Royals.
Which royals ??
@@tolusanwoolu5663Check out my he Amarna DNA results
The pharaohs
I find this fascinating. Thanks so much for this series and this channel!
On a lighter note (😊) Are there any R2d2 or C3p0 lines? How long have these DNA lines been named in this manner-just wondering, cuz if it began pre-Star Wars era, those character names might add a whole new layer of subtext to the storyline, lol!
Glad to see someone else wondering the same thing I've been asking myself (which doesn't get me very far) since his original series at the beginning of covid.
This guy is nuts. Totally nuts.
@@francisgalton2678 why do you say so? Do you have any arguments to support your opinion?
@@francisgalton2678 There you are! The random heckler in the back!
@@tomhenderson6989 lol, if you don't have a coherent response, any intelligent reader would know who the random heckler is...
This addressed EXACTLY the questions I have been asking about our Genesis. Thank you for you great work. 😇🙏
Thanks very interesting. Evolution is being proven wrong daily.
Maybe in your Sequel to "Traced" you can put more in how the Old Testament book of Genesis is encoded in the Chinese language itself. Before B.C. the Chinese worshipped a single God. The word "Create" in Chinese has the imagery of "God Spoke" and so on. The Garden, The Fall, The Flood, Tower of Babel and even the dates for Jesus' Birth/Cruxificion/Resurrection are all recorded in Ancient Chinese documents.
These documents record strange Celestial events in 4 BC and switch of Day/Night followed by Earthquakes and more strange Celestial Events in 31 AD.
The word "Devil" in Chinese has the imagery of Man in a Garden and a presence coming in Secret.
@@whyaskwhybuddry
Devil means deceiver and Satan means adversary
Chinese written history is older than the deserts. Are you trying to say Christianity originated in China? Or are you playing that game where you connect the dots and call it a code? Have you studied Taoism or Buddhism? Do you realize that every religion has the same Golden rule? Do you really beleive that all of human history revolves around your faith? Because if you do, it's very egomaniacal and very wrong.
@@toddfordr8218 No, Christianity didn't exist until Jesus came in 4 BC. What I AM saying is that within the very Chinese Language characters themselves are the same accounts given in the Books of Moses.
What I am saying is that Taoism and Buddhism didn't exist in China until around the Time of Christ.
The Chinese People themselves practiced a form of Judaism, including Blood Sacrifice of spotless Sheep.
Genetically, Chinese, Afghans, Jews, etc are all descendants of Shem and thus are "Semitic People".
This is well recognized in Peer Reviewed Papers.
What I am saying is that the Offical Chinese written documents record the dates of Jesus's Birth, Death and Resurrection.
@@toddfordr8218
Chinese peoples biblical God given ethnicity is Moabites
(Deuteronomy 23:2-4)(Zephaniah 2:8-9)
(Psalm 83:1-6)
We all have one Father in heaven! What a fascinating topic and research!!
Yes.
Thanks!
You've probably heard this before, but in case you haven't: the name for Egypt in the languages in Kenya (both Nilote and Bantu, and also Swahili) is Misri. Misraim or Misreem is a plural, refering to the people of or descendants of Misri. (I was a Peace Corps volunteer in Kenya in the late '80's.)
I had heard this, but thanks for posting about it!
Yes, our ancestors say we came from Misri (a land North). Egypt. We are Abagusii, Bantu of Western Kenya.
@@felixmakinda7689same for the Kuria of East Africa
First off it's know such thing as ancient Egyptians! Egyptians are not ancient.The ancient ancestors of KMT did not call themselves Egyptians and they did not call the land Egypt in ancient time. Correct yourself!
Correct your grammar while we are on changing things.....
Great job! I will definitely use your research in my biblical studies
Nathaniel Jeanson, I'm surely buying this book!!! Thank you for the work, sheeesh!!👏🏿👏🏿
Love it. I will definitely be buying your book. I am sick of my son saying he comes from Monkey's. I keep saying to him you might come from monkey's but I come from Adams rib 😂
Hahahaha...this really got me...I've had to constantly remind the children they're wonderfully and specially made... It eventually sank in
Haha👍🏼my grandma told me she didn't have a tail, and neither do I 🤣😂your comment put me in mind, of her💐great memory.
No if you read the bible you are (unless you are Jewish) you are part of the Genesis 1:23 folks....the folks that were in Nod. The one the Lord said go out and multiply.
Both haplotypes E1b1a and E1b1b populated ancient Egypt, but the return migrations to the interior of Africa were more related to E1b1a. Pharaoh Ramses III and his son Pentaweret are E1b1a.
A Few had MTDna H4a1 - red hair !! 😮
@@Narfina79none did
@@grandregentthragg7896
Takabuti belonged to mitochondrial haplogroup H4a1
Takabuti, was a female in ancient Egypt during the 25th Dynasty
Interesting presentation. One last thing has your data been verified by genetics experts or the International Federation of Human Genetics? If not, will you be presenting at the Feb 22-26, 14th International Congress of Human Genetics held in Cape, South Africa? Many experts will be very interested in your presentation.
some data will not be proven in the conventional scientific methods, but does not change the truth.
@@shansands 😄😄😄😄😄😄😄
Wow so clever, not.
THE ANCIENT EGYPTIANS ARE YORUBA RACE FROM WEST AFRICA. GO TO RUclips CHANNEL dark mattter1801 and watch who is messing with God. Also watch the infinity sign and Egyptology deepest blackhole undercover. Answers in Genesis is a liar.
@@elfodd35 To you, Not.
You spent so much time telling most of us what we already know!
His argument works like this:
1. Establish a Y-chromosome mutation rate based pedigree studies to calculate a Y-chromosome time to most recent common ancestor (TMRCA) approximately 4500 years ago.
2. Reinterpret the Y-chromosome phylogeny and chronology based on this earlier TMRCA.
3. Correlate historical events, like migrations, to nodes in the Y-chromosome phylogeny.
4. Overlay the Y-chromosome phylogeny onto the pedigree for Noah and his sons derived from Genesis.
5. Do (3) for Biblical events (e.g. the Flood, Babel, etc.)
6. Claim he rewrote the history of humanity and confirmed the AiG interpretation of Genesis.
There are, uh, significant problems with the case Jeanson makes.
The first, which underlies much of his analysis, is that he treats genealogy and phylogeny as interchangeable.
They are not interchangeable. Genealogy is the history of individuals and familial relationships. Phylogeny is the evolutionary history of groups: populations, species, etc. A phylogenetic tree may superficially look like a family tree, but all those lines and branch points represent populations, not individuals. This is an extremely basic error.
There are additional problems with each step of the case he makes.
In terms of calculating the Y-TMRCA, it’s nothing new: He uses single-generation pedigree-based mutation rates rather than long-term substitution rates. It’s the same error that invalidates his work calculating a 6000kya mitochondrial TMRCA. He even references a couple of studies that indicate the consensus date of 200-300kya for the Y-MRCA, but dismisses them as low-quality (he ignores that there are many, many more such studies).
He is constrained in an extremely narrow timespan for much of the Y-chromosome branching due to its occurrence after the flood (~4500 years ago) and running up against well-documented, recorded human history (he ignores that Egyptian history spans the Flood). So he has to squeeze a ton of human history into half a millennium, at most.
In correlating his revised node dates on the Y-chromosome phylogeny with historical events, he employs some really half-as…uh, amateurish “analysis”. Like, “the ancestral population for sister haplogroups existed along the line between the geographic homeland for the derived groups, and the descendants migrated in opposite directions” amateurish. I’m not exaggerating; this is how he explains how and where E1b1a and E1b1b descended from E1b1.
He also just ignore inconvenient data that refute his model. Just straight up. Thanks to the crew on the Peaceful Science forum, my favorite example of this is R1b in Europe, and specifically Italy. Jeanson claims haplotype R1b arrived in Europe between 700 and 1400 CE, and specifically in Italy in the 14- or 1500s. Exceeeeeeeept…we have DNA from a stone age burial in northern Italy dated to about 14,000 years ago, and that individual was, you guessed it, R1b.
Even if we take Jeanson’s YEC timeline at face value, a stone age specimen would be pretty close to the flood, about 4kya, which also directly invalidates his model.
Moving on, the next step in his argument is to overlay the Y-chromosome phylogeny (now with incorrect new dates incorrectly correlated to historical events) with the pedigree of Noah and his sons and their descendants derived from Genesis. To do this, Jeanson egregiously acts as though a phylogenetic tree and a pedigree are interchangeable, treating nodes on the phylogeny as specific individuals rather than populations.
And finally, he correlates the haplotypes on the phylogeny (now incorrectly overlayed with Noah’s family tree) with Biblical groups and events.
That’s how Jeanson rewrites the history of humanity. That’s it.
…
It’s actually worse than that. Because he ignores Neanderthals. Neanderthals interbred with Homo sapiens. Most YECs have Neanderthals (and Denisovans) as descendants of Adam and Eve, and living post-flood. This means that Noah is also their Y-MRCA. The problem is that we have Neanderthal genomes, and their Y chromosomes are highly divergent. This necessarily pushes the MRCA back far beyond the YEC timeline, even using Jeanson’s incorrect mutation rates.
How does Jeanson deal with this?
He completely ignores it.
Really. There are a grand total of three (3) mentions of Neanderthals in this book. At no point does Jeanson engage with the fact that Neanderthal genomics refutes the foundation of his argument - the recent Y-MRCA. So…that’s not great.
Dear Dr Nathaniel, thanks for gathering such enormous amounts of data and presenting it to us in a nut shell. Sadly, many people on earth do not share such joys of discovering the truths of the Bible but hate God without a cause.
The Bible is African! Europe/romans stole it!
Perhaps humanity should spend less time on arguing the vast ridiculousness of this physical universe and devote our lives to increased spiritual advancement. I think this is G-d’s intention when He CREATED us. The Kingdom lies within there is no doubt.
Some community are naturally close to nature
It is always a good thing to remember that people moved from Egypt (Misiri) in different directions. I have traced my ancestors from East Africa to Ancient Egypt during the Pharaohs period and based on the actual people with their names and their children. These people followed the bank of River Nile northwards. They never branched to West Africa at all. In 1998 AENEAS CHIGWEDERE, published a book called "The Roots of the Bantu" based on the archaeological findings and the Timbakutu Manuscript; his research work proved beyond doubt that there were three different period which he described as "Trinity", when people left Egypt and moved directly upwards following the River Nile. So, when talking about the "Bantu" people it is helpful to remember that some never crossed Africa to Nigeria and backward to Eastern part of Africa. In any-case the Bantu people's ancestor originated from Ethiopia to Egypt then moved northwards. Even presently, the language is slightly similar within the Bantu people who never moved to Nigeria, while those from Nigeria speak like a small group in East Africa called (Luos or Nilotes), and are mainly found in Northernern Uganda up to South Sudan, some in Kenya and Tanzania. Those from Nigeria are not Bantu but Nilotics. While the rest of present East Africa and southern Africa are mainly "Bantu". So, I am having a problem with the publication about DNA'S being factual of "Bantu"'s origin and movement.
This would explain the Tamil (Dravidian) linguistic cognates Bishop Caldwell reports from West Africa. The Andaman Islanders on the East of India look Bantu. They have been there for tens of thousands of years. The Sentinel Islands protected by India from colonisation. There are also Tamil tribal folks who look Australian.
Bantu are not African, we are Israelites
Truth
Pharaohs are somalian we are same language and culture pls discover of this thing😭
@@xafzayar5322 that's true, all horn Africans are the same Hamitic people.
I am from ancient Egypt and ancient Israel.
52:25 About a year ago, I started tracing my ancestry, as far as it is available online, and you make an excellent point that researching my family history has brought home to me as well. The DNA testing you describe records only the direct male line of ancestry, and I would be surprised if any living human being isn't descended from all three of Noah's sons through this or that ancestral line. I have not yet tested my DNA to find out that aspect of my ancestry, and the documentary trail of my direct male line ancestors goes cold with my 6th great-grandfather, who immigrated to the US from Scotland in the late 1700s. Other branches of my family tree go back much farther, including a very speculative one all the way back through the kings of Israel and Judah to Adam and Eve that is supposedly based off of a genealogy created for King Clovis of the Franks, which I suspect was more propagandistic than historic in nature, as Clovis had recently converted to Christianity and would have wanted to link himself to Biblical kings to enhance his authority.
Yeah. I have a branch like that. I can't remember which branch that is though.
Hey contact me and ill prove you are from the Israelites. No doubt. Try me brother.
Did you get kinda embarrassed as a kid when you seen names like Charles the Bald or Pipin the short ? I sure wasn't enthusiastic to share those names with friends as a kid .I am though very proud of my lineage I come from very interesting families..my 6x grandfather was Myles Standish and Nicholas Holt ( little st.James) Andover helped stop the witch trials..Micha Rude who would have been burned for sure if he were born much earlier..
@@CrazyK64 I actually found names like Charles the Bald and Pepin the Short to be funny when I was a kid. Granted, that was long before I studied my family history and found out I was descended from them! Interestingly, our ancestors traveled to America together on the Mayflower and both signed the Mayflower Compact, as Elder William Brewster was my 12th great-grandfather on my mother's side, through 2 different lines. That was my only famous ancestor I knew about (after Noah and his family) until I started researching, and found that everyone alive today with European ancestry is supposedly descended from Charlemagne, son of Pepin the Short.
@@DamonNomad82 I have much of what was written about Myles by your grandfather..they had a mutual respect but I take it he wasn't to fond of Myles' brash Sense of humor or his stern approach to lawlessness.
But when the colony come down with the fever and even after loosing his wife and child It was your grandfather and mine that did everything to save as many they could..they sloshed bedpans,cooked,bathed cleaned and rolled up their sleeves and did what needed to be done without complaint and your grandfather said that my grandfather was a fierce man of high standards for life and worked tirelessly to save the colony. He respected that..
Thank you for responding it is fascinating to me that we share some DNA and a history worth remembering...I wonder what our grandfather's would have to say about us being able to communicate so many years later. 🤔
Another thing whenever Ken had that debate with Bill Nye the science Guy Bill Nye kept asking do you have any science that you can predict do you have anything you can predict well now there has been plenty of things that have been predicted by creation scientists so why can't Ken and Bill Nye have another debate and this time bring those evidences into the debate?? Very good debate by the way, if u haven't seen it look it up.
'The eyes of the Lord keep watch over knowledge, but he overthrows the words of the traitor.' Proverbs 22:12 ESV 'Let all the earth fear the Lord; let all the inhabitants of the world stand in awe of him!' Psalm 33:8 ESV
THE ANCIENT EGYPTIANS ARE YORUBA RACE FROM WEST AFRICA. GO TO RUclips CHANNEL dark mattter1801 and watch who is messing with God. Also watch the infinity sign and Egyptology deepest blackhole undercover. Answers in Genesis is a liar........
Sumerian tablets, history of Enki tells a facinating history of the past. Explains much of what has been either forgotten or ignored. Definitely worth study .
Enki was a demon
The most important question is that: Researchrs need financial and investiment support, to a complet and satisfatory investigation, and that pass trough filter concerning decision controlers power, correspondent all sectors, sciency, entertnement, educacional, and others that a society may reach in a determined Time or Era.
Whoa, what an amazing discovery! Thank you for doing what you do. So blessed by your work... Pls keep it up. May the Lord continue to bless the work of your hands. 🙏🌈💜
That’s an easy one: E1b = Abraham
E1b1b = Ishmael, Esau
E1b1a = Scattered Israelites Zephaniah 3:10, Luke 21:24
Extraordinary work. Looking forward to more. Thank you.
Japhethites are the family of seven sons that was "enlarged". The Judaic lineages suffered a considerable amount of persecution and loss of the male lineages.
Yes. That’s why there’s only 15-25 million Jwes worldwide today
Do you figure in the Angel/ human mixture? Do you believe the Nephilim were on the Earth after the flood and that people today still carry that gene?
Angels and humans cannot mix. Angels dont procreate.
The Rh factor answers that question.
@@lostmusichits
What are white people
@@lostmusichits Benny, the Lord has not yet revealed these things to you. Perhaps you are still a child, spiritually speaking.
Meat is not for babies.
Clearly; you DO speak from a place of ignorance.
@@lostmusichits According to Enoch, a book which Jesus quotes in Jude, 200 fallen angels took human women to be their partners, and bore Nephilim.
Actually, the pale Arabs may have a common ancestor to all Africans at some point in time, but they are not genetically closely related to the pyramid builders.
The pyramid builders came from the south and went north.
It's been scientifically proven. In all areas of science. At for tose who've seen the paintings and depictions on the walls, do they look like Arabs to you?
Herodutus who was actually there at the time described the Egyptians, so too his contemporaries. If they were Arabs, they were definitely black Arabs. Don't fight with me, fight with the man who lived at that time.
Claiming that the modern Arab Egyptians ancestors are the ancient ones just because they share some DNA with current Africans is like saying that the white french today are the direct decendents of the founders of the great British empire be ause they share a recent common ancestor.
Like I said, according to herodutus if they were Arabs, they would have to be the black Arabs.
I'm not convinced by this talk. There are lot conclusions based on speculations. It looks scientific, but I don't see where the proofs are.
Convincing is relative,understanding preferable.
Are the ancient Egyptians related to modern Egyptians? No, the arabs who form the majority of Egpyt today are the descendants of "arab invaders" who captured it from the romans. When KEMET was invaded by foreigners the Afrikans were still living in KEMET even after the arab invaders displaced the roman invader. The Afrikans who live in "ancient egypt/KEMET are still living in egypt while some of the Afrikan population went further inwards into Afrika such as East & West Afrika and even further down south to places such as South Afrika.
I would agree but some mated with ancient Egyptians Iam sure.
Dr. Jeanson, this was a great video. I read and studied material from John D. Pilkey before the discovery of genetic tracing. I'm looking forward to ytour book.
My MSc is in evolution, I was a fervent defender of evolution and Darwin. Only, 4 years ago I changed all this, and after some investigation found out that evolution is NOT scientific talk.
Thank you, Dr. Jeanson! Your work is fascinating.
@@TheLionFarm is coning to y
يقول البروفسور مشيري على قناة باس الإيرانية
البروفسور ناثانيال ت.جينسون على الحق والهدى والنور
كتابه خطر على الكذابين اللي ينتسبون أنفسهم إلى اجداد غيرهم
فضحهم انام العالمين
ياسلام الله على العلماء الحق ضد الباطل
I am totally blown away and you have connected many dots for me. I have had two DNA analyses by different companies according to their feedback I am 43% Nigeran(Yoruba) and 23% Sierra Leonian (Mende) 7%kenyian Luya 1%Maasai 5.2 Middle Eastern 9.1% Scandinavian 1.0% 2.9 Northwest European 1% Inuit (Eskimo)2%Meso.American(Peru).
lol sir lot of genes
@@imethd90 Yeah, I said the same thing.
Earl Montgomery: Since diversity is supposed to make us stronger, you must be very strong, indeed!
It is interesting that the producer discounts data based on the Transatlantic Slave Trade but doesn't even mention the much worse slavery of the Muslim Arabs from 700CE to the present day.
💯
On of the reasons for that is that the Arab slave trade almost always castrated the African men. As a result, there would be almost no Y chromosome trace of the Arab easterly slave trade because the African men in the Arab trade did not reproduce, unlike in the Atlantic slave trade where they did. His study is only looking at male lineage. Children of female African slaves in the Arab world would not be detectable in Y chromosome data and so don't come into his study.
What? I am arab and we have no slavery, Islam forbade that Europeans are those who die, especially in the Roman empire. Go ahead and mention a single one. You semse never heard story or bilal al habshi.
Egypt is alive And well
Dr. Jeanson, thank you for your mind blowing research. I have always wondered about the origins of the Egyptians, both modern and ancient and whether they were related to the Ancient Pharos and their subjects. I have known for a long time that the 25 Dynasty were Nubian but that they were ousted. So I don't what the immediate effect on the Egyptian population was during their reign or shortly afterwards. Did the invasion from Asia replace the original Egyptian peoples completely or did they intermingle?
I was hoping that you would reveal more in this video about who the Egyptians were before the 25th Dynasty and where their descendants are today, if they survived at all? We have Tut's DNA don't we? Also that of Ramesses II and other Pharos.
There are also mummies from their subjects. Commoners who made it to high office.
And what relation do the Ancient Egyptians have from the first Dynasty to the 24th to each other and to modern Egyptians and even to other people groups?
Is this something that you have researched?
The ancient Egyptians were Nubian, cushites, Israelites/Hebrews, Nilotes etc etc, when the invasions from Asia and Europeans came they inter-married of course, hence the modern day Egyptians and Northerners. They were whited out. But, many also escaped or migrated to other parts of Africa, they're still there to date. Many Africans don't take DNA tests, otherwise you'd be blown away by the findings.
@@teejayangel6638 that obvious if you ask me and the man said african about a thousand times. They just hear whT they want.sadly
@@ninasimone1207 Lol right? I guess they're the type who went to school but their heads were out through the window.
@@teejayangel6638 علي اي دليل بتقولي قصتك العبيطه دي؟! هربوا ؟ لول شعب البانتو عايز يبني لنفسه قصه وهميه علي قد اي هم شعب كان عظيم ! ثم ازاي رمسيس التالت يطلع ع e1b1a وابوه رمسيس التاني طلع ع e1b1b اكيد ف غلط ف التحليل بس الاكيد مالهوش علاقه بالبانتو
ثم اي حوار مافيش تحليل dna للمصريين المعاصرين دي ؟ لول ف كدا تحليل والاغلبيه العظمه ع e-m78 بنسبه 65% (e-v22 ,e-v12 )
@@teejayangel6638 lol tell that to the so called egyptians there now. they believe they're the original egyptians who built the pyramids even though we all know that isn't true.
If you just consider recent colonial history, you can see the fallacy of believing that modern Egyptians are the same people as the Ancient Egyptians. Are modern Americans in the United States the same population of Native Americans who lived here 700 years ago? The Native American population, unhappily, unfortunately, violently, and regrettably, has been for all intents and purposes displaced by Europeans and the descendants of Africans that they enslaved, along with the more recent immigrants from around the world. It would be ridiculous to say that the population of North America has always been what it is, what it looks like, today. This consideration applies even more so to the long trajectory of Egyptian history, especially considering the numerous invasions over millennia since the Pharaonic era.
Couldnt have said it better myself! Thank you!
This is faulty logic. European colonists committed genocide in America as we all know, which resulted in the disappearance of Native Americans. But there is no historical evidence that Arabs who invaded Egypt ever committed mass slaughter in Egypt. In fact, the history says otherwise. When Muslim delegation first arrived in Egypt, it was headed by an Arab Black man. The Egyptian ruler then took aside a member of the Muslim delegation and asked why Muslims had sent a Black man as their chief because Egyptians look down upon such people. Muslims said that their leader is the most educated and able among them, and that's why he was chosen by their Caliph.
@@QabilAGhor You don't have to slaughter a people to replace their population. Donald Trump's anti-immigrant policies today are grounded in fear that the low birth rate among US whites is leading to white population replacement due to the high birth rate of undocumented Latino immigrants living in the US. Population replacement takes place in many different ways.
@@QabilAGhor if you think this demographic did not change over the course of its history, you should re-evaluate the way you think.
@@The_Truth- Which demographic? Not sure what you mean.
I thought I was talking to myself. The DNA Trace, egyptology the Nigerians, native Americans the Atlantic slave trade, the sons of Noah, European, on and on and on. I really have no words to explain my enthusiasm.👍
It is weird how all the DNA tests always have "you are 2% Jew" but never about real ppl who existed for thousands of years and lived in a particular location.
It is political. If the DNA test shows that you are 2% Near Eastern/ Levantine ( could be Lebanese or Syrian) then some companies would show you as 2% Jewish.
@QabilAGhor I have a feeling it depends on who they are comparing to. It was an unregulated industry from day one to this day and just depends on who is running the show.
I am an Akan, Ghanaian descendent. The descendant line of the Egyptian Kings. If you matched my DNA to the King Pharaohs you might be surprised at the similarities. But the modern day “Egyptians” refuse the truth.
I believe you.
E1B1A is the blood of Israel and the pharaohs. See Book of Jasher. Shalom from the House of DAVID and Marlborough 👊🏿🙏🏿
They might also be surprised that Menu/Mena (Menes), Tutu Ancoma (Tutankhamun), Tutu Mose (Thutmose), Sechi (Seti), Tahaqua (Tarkwa), Kuffour/ Akufu (Khuffu), Amanqua (Menkuare), Tetteh (Teti), Prah (hoprah), etc are our names too.
Please credit the Africans alil more. E1B1B as you highlighted have alot of African origins namely, Nilotic and Cushitic even silent Nubic - Berberic tribes Kenya and Cushiting, Nubia, and Berber Somalia, Sudan even South Sudan area, you're also forgetting the indigenous black African DNA of North African which include the Kemet or the Swahili name for Egypt (which is "Misri" whose origin comes from Misraim one of the sons of Ham I believe), Berber who do not identify with the Arabs though speak the language. The Cushites and Nubian are of dark skin origin not Arab origin. Punt is where Kenyan, Tanzania, into Mozambique, Uganda and Congo region who are the referenced "Bantu" hence "Punt" common "Bant"/"Punt" - "Ubuntu" where the B/P consonant sounds are confused with each other in the announciations which is absolutely E1B1A because of where migratory paterns are which could include neighboring regions with original boundaries. Having fun with it a little more "they" (in the North Eastern block) can't say "Bunt" they say "Bunt" lol
Absolutely amazing information here! Thank you and God Bless you!
معلوماته صحيح تاريخيا وعلميا بالمرصاد على المزورين و الكذابين
Hallelujah! The Word of God is the Benchmark! The True Solid Foundation! The Rock!
No other group on earth comes closer to ancient Egyptian DNA than Egyptian‘s today.
Bollocks
If there is such a correlation between Haplogroup E1b1b and the Moslem conquests, (1) Why is there not much of the E1b1b in Arabia and (2) Why is there so much of it outside the Arab caliphate at its greatest extent? E1b1b looks more like a North African haplogroupe that overflowed into Africa from Asia than the reverse.
😂😂😂😂
Africa is the origin of Everything. Don’t try to bring in fakes.
Data keeps piling up in support of Biblical truth!
If you look at original Ethiopians, they have a very distinct look. If you look at original Egyptians (especially Coptics and from the area of “upper Egypt”) they have a very distinct look. I wondered why this is, and upon reading the heritages in Genesis, Cush was a son of Ham, and Egypt was a son of Ham… and my mind=blown. This presentation actually gets several points right.
Ancient Egyptians, are connected to modern day Egyptians, the connection to my ancestors are eternal.
It is indeed. Modern and ancient Egyptians share the same genome, with a differential of no greater than 15%. You are verifiably the same people, despite the crazed community who desires the identity.
@@annemurphy9339 the drawings on the pyramid walls says otherwise, they depicts them as the true Africans.
Those pyramid walls and it's drawings have there for thousands of years. The artefacts and drawings of Rameses and queen Tiye and her husband Amunhatap were African.
@@abigailnomsamndebele6351 Queen Tiye had long brown hair with blonde highlights that fell in soft waves. Afrocentrism mistakes the carving of her in a head cap - made of wood that has oxidized over the millennia - as her hair when it is a covering. There are photos of her very caucasoid hair online. The blood types and skulls of her parents are caucasoid. Egyptians represented themselves very differently than Nubians in their artworks: like most ancient caucasoid societies of the time, men were rendered a reddish-brown and women painted in the palest yellow. There are heavy brows - a caucasoid feature - with typically Middle Eastern almond-shaped eyes, aquiline noses, and lips may be either full or thin, but always in the caucasoid phenotype.
@@abigailnomsamndebele6351 exactly tell the Liars and Identity Thieves the Truth
@@annemurphy9339 🤔🧐🤣🤣🤣🤣, you're delusional, europeans wants us to believe that a country in Africa before invasion had Caucasian from the caucus mountain, Wow 😭🤣🤣.
You are truly a delusional, entitled, hateful, inhuman, naccistical pycopaths of a race.
Going through so much length to dehumanise, discredit and hate Africans about their own history in their own continent, Wow.
Your forefathers invaded Africa, stole, killed and destroyed just like the devil.