[Slow motion] 240Hz vs 144Hz vs 120Hz vs 60Hz - Monitor refresh rates
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 янв 2025
- ►Review: wasd.ro/hardwa...
RAW Files here: RAW files here: wasd.ro/editor...
Filmed with Sony RX10 II
►Review-uri din tech si gaming: wasd.ro
❤️Pentru a ramane conectat la video-urile WASD aboneaza-te la: bit.ly/34z8CFi
📣Reducere la orice de pe PC Garage cu codul de Voucher: MTJ9UUUU
Scrie-mi la adresa:
►fulger@wasd.ro
Social:
►Instagram: / wasd.ro
►Twitter: / wasdro
►Facebook: / wasd.ro
Hey! 360 Hz slomo video up! Check it!
ruclips.net/video/4-owPNqwxMo/видео.html
Hows this work?
My msi laptop is about 144hz but when i play LOL its fps is about 240 fps
Hows that working?
@@alucardlord9032 you need to 144x240
Yeah Helps to spot enemies in advance
8gb vram
**cries in 60hz**
@@dkdkdkekkddk7342 lol try to overcloack it
Ow laptop some monitors are not able to be overclocked i think you cant search it on yt
Or maybe one day i make video just so lazy 😅
*cries in 240hz to flex on other people*
But everybody still watching movies with 28 fps and say 60 fps is not good)
Human eye can only see 8 gb of Ram
True
LOL
Where I can download ram? Link pls
Download-ram-here-no-virus.com
@@Pepino8A fun you
240Hz? Naah, I love the teleportation feature my 60Hz monitor gives me lol.
Happy 2 Trigger You
Nah his monitor uses flying raijin
Happy 2 Trigger You 🤧 I thought in was the only one that acknowledges him
You guys have hz?
60hz? I love my transportation feature my 15fps GPU gives
I finally have a 144hz ; ; so happy
I finally got a 144hz monitor and the difference is day and night. Even the mouse when you are on the desktop feels so much better. I still use my old monitor as a second monitor. Now when I move the mouse over to the old monitor, it feels like I'm using a broken monitor.
tell that to the others commenting on this video:))
Same
Same, 144hz is necessary to be the best at geometry dash, and i switched my monitor to 60hz a week after getting a 144hz, and its atrocious.. How did i live without 144hz?
Latios / Spearmint Oh GD
yes v much so. sub to my yt and add me "spearmint" :)
240hz is still smooth in slowmotion, Amazing!
GD Teamspectrum oh hello fellow gd players
nice to play gd
Read the edit before replying:
Geometrican the thing is we don't play in slow motion any videogame, so the benefits are non existent in more than 60hz
*EDIT* : you guys are correct no need to reply to this comment,i did not know
Also what i meant to say is that 240hz versus for example 120 or 144hz wont make much of a big deal if you dont have both monitors next to each other to notice the difference,of course.
Thats all have a nice day =D.
Jhin a blooming Flower you can definitely tell the difference between different displays when youre playing, after 144hz we dont see so much difference clearly, and bigger than 240hz would probably be pointless, mayby it doesnt affect to league of legends so much but to other games like fps it will make a huge difference
You can choose how fast slow motion is, moron.
I thought that 144hz monitors were overrated and that they couldnt be that much better than 60hz so i bought one and when i started using it, i told myself "damn theres not much difference at all" and then someday after a couple of weeks of use i randomly surfed through some settings and i came across "monitor resfresh rate" and it was set at 60..
So i used a 144hz monitor set at 60hz for a couple of weeks lmfao. when i turned it to 144 the difference is like a night and day, i couldnt go back to 60hz, no way
lmao
Dude where can you find the settings?
@@screamoman6265 Nvidia control panel or advanced display settings
I got my 240hz monitor and it was the same story. Except I was aware of what my frame rate was, as my monitor has a built in frame counter.
greek did this except he had it for 3 years like that
Now i know that my 60hz monitor belongs to Trashcan
SpawnNightking lol 😂
lol
no it dont... do you film your monitor and then play at slowmotion ? if game is smooth at 60 whats the problem than?
Slower updates, more motion blur etc
Just imagine you are aiming fast moving oponent. Sometimes he moves so fast that is not possible to draw him on slow refresh rate monitor.
"hUMaN eyE cAN'T sEe OVeR 30 fPS"
It cant, that doesnt mean 60 fps onscreen means 60 frames the eye comprehends, that means a fraction of that is intersection, of 60 frames you probably perceive like 30, so with 60 frames refresh rate you should normally be at your max, 60+ is only glorification. you can show ppl 100 fps and 200 fps videos and 30% of them will even recognize a difference after close looking.
Salty Pulse Main 60fps, no 30fps ,30 fps is low
BiOhExEn Hernández Stupid he’s joking.
No biting the packagerino Kripperino He was joking wtf.
Idiot's like this will be dumb forever.
It doesn't matter, human eyes can only smell 8 cores per second.
Leafyy but can you smell it?
@@zLeafyy Lock this guy up with the sped children
@@zLeafyy the only dumbfuck i see here is you mate
@@zLeafyy JOKE
LOL I CAN ONLY SMELL 4 PIXELS LMAO
This made me feel I needed a new monitor, then I remembered that 60fps are completely fine because this was recorded at 1000 fps
Its kinda true but remeber its smooth above 60hz . You dont need 240 hz maybe but at least 144hz to have it double smooth
Got my 144Hz monitor today, there’s a massive difference. I would definitely recommend it
@@tmacleod4616 Same , i got mine 1 week ago and its masive in compare to 60 hz. You can feel the diference even at moving windows tabs
@@tmacleod4616 lol i have 240Hz
60hz is bullsh1t, 144hz opened my eyes again 🤣
BEST AND FASTEST VID EXPLAINED Hz ON RUclips!!!!
thanks
JimmyGunXD556 who cares?
Nobody plays in slow motion recording at 1000 fps
+eltonz no, but that isn't the point, the more hertz, the smoother it is in real time.
All u need 120 hz monitor everything above that is pointless exept for a minor group of people..
and that is why they made those monitors, not everyone needs them but some people like them.
"The human RAM can only eye 4000 MHz of keyboard horsepower" - Pythagoras
You mean 1600 lol
@@stellatecar7634 why 1600?
@@Simon11354 ddr3 is el sucko
@@stellatecar7634 i have 2 hz memory
@@Simon11354 that’s pretty cool
I recently upgraded to 144hz from 75hz. It initially felt somewhat smoother but when i looked at another 60hz display after getting used to 144, the 60hz felt like it was a slideshow.
Now imagine people thinking 30fps videos are better than 60fps videos😂 that‘s just because people are used to seeing slideshows! I guarantee if we would all watch 60fps videos from now on, no one could go back that fast again.
FPS and HZ matter!
@@RabbitConfirmed nah I'm good with 24fps ☺️
@@hoonigan1423 bruh, slideshow enjoyer
@@RabbitConfirmed yep got used to it
@@hoonigan1423retard
GUYS ONCE YOU GO TO 120+ HZ YOU CANT GO BACK TO 60HZ EVER!! just a warning
Tan Tan i can confirm this. I tried but i couldn't give my 144hz monitor back :/
Yes. And you will turn your game settings down until you get that framerate. Even if its the lowest settings.
Tan Tan yea made that mistake when microcenter had monitors on display for people to use
Yeah just got 144hz a month ago. Had to hook my 60hz monitor back up bc i was trouble shooting something.......I will not go back.
So true. 2560x1440@165Hz .. even basic use like moving windows around is eyegasm. I remember before 2000's when people were arguing if human eye can even see difference between 30 and 60 fps. xD xD Anyway, I threw my 3840x2160 TN panel piece of shit out.. it's sitting under my desk at work and trying to pimp it for couple of hundred to anyone would would take it but I am too late.. literally everyone has wisened up. Sux. xD
Recently jumped to a 165hz monitor after being stuck on 60hz displays my whole life. Holy moly it truly makes a difference. Once you go high refresh rate you really don't go back.
after 240hz mark it becomes hard to see the difference
144 to 240 isn't much of a difference no. But 240 to 500? That actually does make a noticeable difference
This video is very laggy. I'm watching on my 960Hz monitor. And my eyes and my brain are very fast, so I'm watching this world in 0.1x. And of course 960 is my IQ.
Jack Isn't Daniel's 💪👍
I bet you watch Rick & Morty
Savage! And well said :D
GTX is very outdated series, dude. I'm using intel IGX 960X gpu.
Oh my jelly!
700 hz will be perfect
Only for minecraft
It is not launch yet
Nah bro 1400 hz
Just do it the Intel way. "5ghz"
bombos and blurry
I haven't experienced 100Hz+ refresh rate, but when I lower my LCD screen resolution to1024x768 it can run at 75Hz I can tell the difference from 60Hz. So I guess 144Hz will be so relaxing to eyes.
found ur comment in 2022. Same, im still stuck with 60hz 18.5 LCD monitor. At 1024*768 monitor runs at 75hz. Difference is easily noticeable between 60hz and 75hz
Me too it felt pretty nice to switch from 60hz to 75hz since my monitor offers 75hz for any resolution under 1024x768
@@rennygator hi
i found out my monitor can run 1080p 75hz
and I have a 144Hz laptop now 😁 anyhow I use it at 60hz most of times in single player games
@@zenvir1680 Wow congrats for that
Perfect video. Clearly demonstrates the difference without ample preamble. Thanks for the video!
When you are stuck with 60hz, 60 fps looks pretty smooth and you'd want everything to be in 60 fps but then you see 120hz/144hz so then you can never call 60hz smooth again
The thumbnail does the amazing work of illustration! Great work👍
When 60 is already not enough but most console games still run 30
@Cody every open world game is 30fps. Games like GTA, witcher 3, god of war are all at 30fps. Multiplayer games like cod , fortnite and battlefield are barely reaching 60
@Cody they are actcually locked at 30 because they cant go higher than 30 in those games anyways only game that i know it isnt capped is fortnite
@Cody Go watch GTA5 and witcher 3 benchmarks dipshit. On console it's CAPPED at 30fps and even dips down below that
@Cody then why are you getting offended and upset? Was I wrong saying that graphically demanding games are locked at 30?
Cody none of you fuckers are poor
The human frames cannot see more than 60 eyes per second.
Xavier Xavier there's no given number your eyes can or cannot see
+Copper Penny are you sure you read that first comment correctly?
r/whoosh
The歐Boss r/ihavereddit
@@f16airforce lmao
Personally I thought that "144hz can't be THAT good", but geez, now I can't go back to 60hz. I know 240hz is better, but 144 is enough, it's cheaper and it's still smooth af.
If you would try 240hz than you wouldn't say that 144hu is enough
@@sn1per445 yeah for competitive shooters you def better off with 240 as u don't have graphics maxed nor are they as visually demanding, but for someone who plays mostly single player games 144 is nice as u can hit 120-144 fps with high /ultra graphics & still have super smooth image.
Especially if u coming from 60hz like me ha.
@@tyguy3876 me playing Cod on ps4 60 FPS... Still Good
This is stupid everyone knows the human eye can’t see beyond 2 FPS
Its ya boi Andrew Jackson I downloaded more fps to a flash drive and swallowed it so now I see at 6 fps.
I put sodium in my dickhole so now i can see 8 fps
People with glasses can see up to 22 fps because i wear glasses i should onow
People with aids see over 100fps
Peasants. I poured bleach in my eyes and now I cannot see
I find it funny that a goal of this decade is to make games look super realistic, yet when it comes to real-life fluidity nobody cares.
Then you don't understand why games exist from the very beginning.
8cow
If you're gonna say "because videogames aren't real life", the same statement could be implied when talking about realistic graphics.
Competitive gamers often do care. I remember playing at LAN parties in the early 2000's and fast CRTs were the thing. You could put some of them up to 150hz, but at only 1024x768. For the time, that was a good resolution, considering how slow GPUs were. Back then, there were a lot of people repeating the meme that you can't see more than X frames per second or that it was just a superficial thing, not affecting pleasure or gamer performance. Now it's no uphill battle to convince most people of the value of it. It amazed me how long it took for manufacturers to increase the refresh rate of LCDs considering the value that competitive gamers get from faster refresh rates.
i played cs 1.5 & 1.6 on a crt with 800+600p
i remember that the monitor i had could hit way over 100hz and i turned everything in the game down what sucks frames.
and i always had the biggest monitor on the lan partys, it was, if i remember right 21".
we all played with at least 100fps. if you did not, you got killed and called everybody cheater. :D thats the same guys who say you can't see more then xy fps ...
Because real-life fluidity requires a whole lot more straightforward GPU power than to make it look prettier. That, plus for the longest time LCD tech just wasn't available to do it. The transition from CRT to LCD took a very long time. Even now CRTs have some advantages over LCD, although they've finally lost out on resolution ever since the 4k monitors came out.
I feel like if some companies kept investing in CRT we'd have some pretty awesome monitors to compete with LCDs. Problem is they're more polluting, hard to ship, and potentially more expensive.
To the idiots saying that you can only see the difference because it is slow motion, that’s simply the only way to show the difference on a 60hz monitor. You couldn’t see the extra refreshes on your monitor so the only way to show you is by retiming the footage so 240hz is remapped to 60.
You can absolutely see the difference in real time. It basically manifests itself as additional smoothness and slightly better clarity (likely due to taking in more visual information over time).
One thing to be aware of though is some 144hz displays default to 60 hz. Most games also default to 60hz and others include frame limiters (some configurable, some not). You also need a GPU powerful enough to hit 144fps, if you are only getting 60fps in game you aren’t going to see any benefit. So you are going to need more raw power and will need to do some configuration.
I’ve seen some say they can see the difference on the desktop but not in game. In these cases chances are they haven’t configured the game properly. Almost every game I’ve tried defaulted to 60hz and needed to be manually configured to run in 144hz. Unfortunately, most RPGs and Fighting games were hard locked to 60 so if RPGs and Fighters are the only thing you play maybe 4K60 is the better option for you in particular.
Speaking of 4K60, the visual difference in games between 1440p144 and 4K60 is minor. 144hz gives that bit of additional clarity and it helps to bridge the gap in raw resolution a bit.
Where 144hz really shines is in the smoothness. The game looks visibly more smooth in motion. If you don’t see the difference in smoothness chances are you fucked up your settings somewhere and are still viewing at 60hz. Use an FPS counter and check your monitor settings (most monitors show output resolution and frame rate in the overlay built into the monitor) to make sure the refresh rate is still at 144hz.
As an owner of an Acer B286HK 4K60 monitor and a Pixio PX276h 1440p144 monitor I can say from experience that 144hz makes for a much better experience. But it is more expensive to do right (you need that extra GPU power after all) and it takes configuration and some genres don’t even take advantage of it. Make sure you know what you are buying.
Now I don’t want anything else than 240 hz
Jose Díaz except 1000hz
Jose Díaz 256hz?
Darnell Davis You're an idiot
@Darnell Uhhh, the 240 hz cake is real, GLaDOS.
The movie addict The movie addict what a smart person
I'm using a 144Hz display. So 60Hz looks like 30Hz
RedRayZ no
I know this is super old but I haven't seen anyone else still play shiro neko aka white cat project.
lul
Weird flex but ok
im 240Hz, so 60 looks like 10
My experience switching from 60hz to 240hz its not even night and day.. it's spring and winter..
What a great way to show the difference! I'm currently running on 60 Hx screens and have always felt like it was lagging. This explains why it feels that way! My next monitor will definitely be 120Hz or higher.
@Clean Gameplay I did! It's a world of a difference!
FUN FACT: MOST OF US WATCHING IN 60 HZ SCREEN
Can confirm
Na, my phone is 120hz, laptop 240hz, desktop 240hz, TV 120hz, secondary monitor 240hz, spare monitors 144hz and 165hz etc
Awesome video, illustrates the concept perfectly
I read that experts claim around 250 hz is akin to real-life motion, which tells me ALL post-240 hz will be smooth even at slow-motion. That means, all post-240 offer very MINOR improvement to gameplay, as some test subjects already report on the 360 hz gaming monitor. The frame-to-frame times prove this, as well. Of course, in reality, 120 hz is very smooth in real-time, and is more than good enough for non-pro simracing, and even non-pro first-person shooters. The cut-off point is about 120 hz as this is about 8 ms frame-to-frame, which is deemed the ideal range for response time (hence why all modern monitors and TVs are anywhere from 1 to 8 ms rt), since it's difficult for the brain to even process an image faster than this (MIT testing showed that a human brain can process an entire image in 13.3 ms (equal to 75 hz)). It also creates smoothness and removes 'ghosting'. The biggest advantage to higher hz is not time, but smoothness (though there is also a big time advantage comparing 60 to 240 hz). But, 60 to 120 hz is fairly minor, as is 144 to 240 hz. 30 to 60 hz is a larger jump, as it happens. Some testing shows that 60 to 144 hz saves 1.2 second on lap time (which equates to 9.7 ms more time frame-to-frame and 21 extra frames, which is not a massive jump, but is notable and large).
Context:
An 8-hour test from the website, Overtake, reported that Joe (the editor) saw some minor racing improvements and saved 1.2 seconds off his lap from 60 to 144 hz (a fair difference of 9.7 milliseconds). We can roughly break that logic down (if we take Joe, the editor, as a rough gauge, and his 8-hour test as decent sampling. This was on ACC):
*Assuming around 1 millisecond saves 0.2 seconds on lap time from Joe's baseline lap. (I also added the additional frames per reaction for each comparison.) Bold show the common jumps, so you can easily compare them. Fewer extra frames at lower hz jumps makes more difference than many extra frames at higher hz jumps (even if they are larger jumps). Very much worth keeping in mind in the context of 120 to 240, and future hz.
30 to 360 hz would save 5.5 s on lap time (30.6 ms of difference). 84.5 extra FPR [additional frames per reaction at 250 ms per reaction].
30 to 240 hz would save 5.2 s on lap time (29.2 ms of difference). 53.5 extra FPR.
30 to 144 hz would save 4.7 s on lap time (26.4 ms of difference). 28.5 extra FPR.
30 to 120 hz would save 4.4 s on lap time (25 ms of difference). 22.5 extra FPR.
30 to 60 hz would save 2.8 s on lap time (16.7 ms of difference). 7.5 extra FPR.
60 to 360 hz would save 2.1 s on lap time (13.9 ms of difference). 77 extra FPR.
60 to 240 hz would save 1.8 s on lap time (12.5 ms of difference). 46 extra FPR.
*60 to 144 hz saved Joe 1.2 s on lap time (9.7 ms of difference). 21 extra FPR.
60 to 120 hz would save 1 s on lap time (8.3 ms of difference). 15 extra FPR.
120 to 360 hz would save 1.1 s on lap time (5.6 ms of difference). 62 extra FPR.
144 to 360 hz would save 0.8 s on lap time (4.2 ms of difference). 56 extra FPR.
120 to 240 hz would save 0.8 s on lap time (4.2 ms of difference). 31 extra FPR.
144 to 240 hz would save 0.5 s on lap time (2.8 ms of difference). 25 extra FPR.
240 to 360 hz would save 0.3 s on lap time (1.4 ms of difference). 31 extra FPR.
120 to 144 hz would save 0.3 s on lap time (1.4 ms of difference). 6 extra FPR.
eh, 144hz is more than good enough.
TeqHDcasper *looks at bank account*
Yes... D e f i n i t l y ...
That's what you said about 60Hz 5 years ago. I agree 144Hz is enough, but I can admit that most liekly after getting used to 240Hz I would say 144Hz is not enough.
in some situation 144hz seemed far superior to 120 hz (for me...)
but i doubt many people will go for 240 hz. i think 2k with 120hz >>> 1080p with 240hz (i think nearly same hardware is needed to play on these settings)
in the near future i cant imaginge there will be more 240hz monitors. perhaps when everybody has 4k monitor at home they start going for over 144/165 hz
(dunno if this will be in 5 years)
if my computer would run it i would prefer 4k with 120hz to 2k with 240hz too...
ps i think in WoW (or games like that) even a 4k 60hz will be far superior to a 1080p 240hz.
pps console nubs say 20-30 hz are more than enough :P
new mmo's are more like fighting games, so ur better off with a high refresh rate monitor, but 240hz is overkill, even if u can see a little difference, u can't react faster, best bet is 100-144hz of whatever resolution u can afford, since all games have supersampling options and thats good enough, otherwise u'd pay out the ass right now, since most 4k monitors that are cheaper suck and gpu prices are too high
99% of pple aren't even good enough at gaming to even need above 60hz though
Nothing in this world is ever good enough. :) I can remember when people said you would NEVER need more than a few MBs of ram....
This is one of the best demonstrations I've seen. Nice and fair, no sponsored marketing bs
Got a 144hz monitor a few years ago, and the difference was night and day. 60fps instantly became more like 30fps to me.
The best way to describe a 144hz monitor is that it's "liquid". Everything is so extremely smooth, even the desktop - you feel like you're swimming with ease.
120hz on my new laptop, what a difference it makes. its like getting glasses for the first time lmao.
so is 60 bad ?
@@joeyhernandez7908 pretty much yeah. I thought 30HZ looked awful when I had a 60hz monitor.
After I got 144hz, 60hz looked awful and 30hz made me want to jump out a 10 story building into magma
bumping from a 60hz to 240hz tommorrow i know shit is going to be fire
In the last test where it was shooting bullets, the 240hz was clearly at a very big advantage.
The 240hz was seen as " first flash then bullet came out"
While the 144hz was " first bullet then flash "
Big advantage imo.
a n i m e
n
i
m
e
Good video. What I learned is that if I playback my games in slow motion, get a 144hz or 240hz monitor.
funny how everyone that now has a 144hertz screen can't go back to 60hertz because it looks like a slide-show or think the monitor is broken.
my laptop screen is 300hertz and now i can see the difference between 144 and 300
The difference between 240 and 144 is that 240 puts a whole in your pocket where money used to be
*hole
144 Hz is like the Smooth Spot.
Furthermore you can overclock your display. Sometimes you will even reach up to 200hz!
So if you don't wanna spend 500$ for 240hz, go with 144hz and overclock !
byBono Yeah, and have it last a couple months
The Pushing Terapolygon Dude, i dont own a 144hz Monitor..
I have a 5 Year old 16:10 Samsung Monitor with 60hz...
I am just saying, if u have the money go for a 240hz Monitor, but the best you can get for less money is a 144h Monitor.
byBono I actually got my TV to run 120hz progressive. Then, I tried 240hz interlaced... The refresh rate was amazing if you ignore the severe color and pixel artifacts haha...
you can buy a 240 hertz monitor with free-sync and a sub 1 millisecond response time for around $400
Great video, just what I was looking for. Thank you!
When I play in my laptop it doesn't show fps it feels like a slide show
2 FPS
💀💀💀 F
@@eeriemyxi 2 seconds per frame
Now imagine watching porn at that refresh rate...
😂😂
LOL
🙄... of course... who would have even dreamed of that statement
99.99% of porn doesn’t go above 60fps so It won’t make a difference
(Don’t “wOoOOosh” me you fucking 11 year olds. I know he was joking.)
Elijah D You have to say 🛡R/WOOSH SHILED🛡
In this era, it should be 75Hz and 100Hz because it is not too little and not too much, and the price is affordable.
yea
More fps gives you... More frames per second! Who would've thought. Great experiment.
It's helpful because it shows a comparison. I've only played on a 60hz monitor so I have no idea what the actual difference between different hz monitors is like. But now I can conclude that higher hz is definitely better.
Ohh that's why I can't AWP well in 60hz ??? The enemies r moving so fast in my screen 🤣
This is a much better video comparison.
just straight to the point no bs
Should have shown 30fps for all the console sheep.
+1
+Goldfinger W, if the game is not exclusive, you will prefer PC port then. Because better picture, better resolution, better FPS. That's the point
Goldfinger W
Tell me what investments youve made then silly
Im not a pc elitist and im not with the original comment calling conole players “sheep.” But its clear to me that these console “sheep” he is referring to are people that refuse to believe the human eye can see above 30 fps. Honestly if you believe that and youre not atleast 40 years old, thats fucking remarkable.
@Goldfinger W *has both console and a PC, also uses cryptocurrency* "Fucking nerds", bahaha, pathetic
There is no need for that. I have a PC, but people like you are what gives the PC community a bad name. Respect other peoples choices, they may not have enough money. Be fucking considerate, no one Is going to like you, and probably dont even now.
Great review !
good to know we got all the fps experts on the hunt.
I use a 60hz monitor. I feel like a console peasant again
bruh
I’m so happy with my 144hz monitor
now I see, in 144hz your eyes is more focus because the object is moving smoothly & that makes your eyes reaction much faster, so when you look at 60hz you can see the interval like its pausing
Cheers, looking at this, 120hz is much better than 60hz, but 240hz doesn't seem like a massive improvement. Yes it is less jerky, but I think if you can get away from 60hz to 100hz+, you are doing well. My 73hz OC is feeling inadequate.
10 years ago, we said the same about 30hz vs 60hz
uhm, RUclips doesn't allow higher refresh rates than 60, and this video is in fact only in 50fps, this is why he slowed it down so much
This video makes me want 240hz... I'm currently on 60hz and was planning to upgrade to 144hz.
Monitor is complicated so just don't say 240hz best, if your monitor is 240 hz and you get 100 fps , 100hz monitor would have given you a better gaming experience , you know without stuttering or desyncing
wow i love you sir :D , absolutely subscribed
60hz and below have teleportation effect
Not on normal speed.
Not on a good TV.
TV has high input lag. There is also high ghosting factor. So if you see continous line instead of mustiple mouse pointers, your display is ghosting a lot. Or you have stroboscopic backlight which is not good for eyes.
Paweł Stankiewicz Idiot
That means 60hz is better cause we are hacking legally
Moved up from a 27" IPS 1440p144 to a 48" OLED 4k120 and i have to say I don't miss the other monitor.
Ready for 240hz 4k OLED HDR. Hurry up and invent this technology I will buy!
240 MHz OLED HDR is when ill be happy
G-sync, V-sync, Free-sync, Free-bleed give it all I'll take it!
Retina 240 Hz with quantum dot and HDR...
I've been waiting for oled monitors for 10+ years. It will never come. >:(
+Bonez0r www.anandtech.com/show/12287/asus-unveils-proart-pq22uc-oled-monitor
FPS: 60
Monitor refresh rate: 30 hz
*BOTTLENECK*
?
*It may sound silly, but this is very useful in FPS games.*
Only thing that sounds silly is you thinking that would sound silly!
all i need now is 4k 240hz monitor :D
1440p is more than enought...
and 6x 1080Ti's, cause a single one can barely handle stable 60fps at 4K...
Most games yes, but not every game. Wildlands for example sometimes drops below 40fps on my machine (UHD). And its not the CPU or anything, it's the GPU wich is too slow in that moment. same for Rise of the Tomb Raider, GPU is struggling maintaining 60 fps.
Yes the card is crazy fast, the fastest gaming card atm. But its not the holy grail
and what is the hell is "10K"? 9600x5400?10240 × 4320? both cases are far more than 40MPixel, i heavily doubt that 2x 1080ti will do it at enjoyable framerates..
ultra wide 4k @ 240hz, then i am happy...
... at least until faster monitors come along :D
That would involve pumping out 1 990 656 000 pixels per second. At 24 bits of color per pixel, that's 6 gigabytes per second. I guess that's not too amazing, but the amount of GPU power to process the polygons and textures on such a setting would be pretty crazy.
Better to wait a few years for those (affordable) 4k 144hz monitors huh
4k??? Yeah my pc aint gonna be able to run that
We got them now lol. Now actually running 4k still isn't cheap but
Yeah 120/144hz is for sure the sweet spot. (I said "120/144" because it's whatever one is available to you, there's really no difference between the two)
60Hz: internet explorer
240 Hz looks like true slow motion
xd yes
I actually used to play better with 60fps at some point, because I was so used to accounting for the small but noticeable frame gap between 60fps and higher.
240 hz it's amazing
...Amazingly useless
240hz for csgo and lol not for the fucking open world games where you barely hit 200fps lol
+TheAlbinGames that's what people used to say about 90 hz.... it's just not true... the longer you stare at 240 the longer you can see the smooth transitive properties in comparison to 144/120.
it's really fucking smooth. 60 hz honestly gives me motion sickness if i ever go that low...
Semi Kurgini 540hz is even more amazing
I remember once i've seen my friend's monitor... It was so fking smooth but i dont know how much hertz did it have...
I hope it was 144hz because im buying one .. and
60hz sucks mate
I had. 60hz and my game felt sooo laggy it was just slow I got the Alienware 25 monitor and it’s so damnnnn smooth now
The shock when you realize movies are still shot at 24fps.. sad world
Yeah it is but you still can use softwares like smooth video project that can make any video run at your monitor refresh rate
It's like magic
@@aboodxbk it's interpolated, looks fake
@@aboodxbk do you know free alternatives?
@@ob1keno227 well it's fake but still better than 24 30fps
144hz is lovley in desktop but honestly, my GLOSSY 60hz looks better due to better contrast and deeper blacks than the shit house matte displays flooding the market.
Jump from 60hz to 120hz is huge, but then 120hz to 144hz not so much but then damn the jump from 144hz to 240hz is very noticeable!
Complot theory: 240hz only good for slo mo
Nah man 480hz is the thing now... 240 hurts my eyes
man you are waaay too outdated, 1000hz is the real stuff
The funny thing is 480hz actually exists now, and some company claims to be working on 1000hz tech
Full hz breakdown:
I will denote something I am coining 'frames per reaction', which is the number of frames you will see before you process and execute a given action assuming an average reaction time of 250 ms (as studies show this to be the average reaction time of a human, and some online testing shows that average gamers are anywhere from 190 to 300 ms per reaction). The different hz rates will also be listed in accordance with this.
Note: I omitted 75 hz because very few games and gamers use it at all; however, 75 hz would be the cut-off point for most gaming because that's about how long it takes the human brain to process an entire image according to MIT testing (13.3 milliseconds). This is most likely where the myth came from that the human brain is capped at 60 hz (hence why 60 hz has been the standard for decades). In theory, that means you cannot actively use post-75 hz, though post-75 hz is still useful because video games deal in real-time rendering of many continuous frames/images, not just one image (I will mention the upper-limit of this, as well). (165 hz also exists, and Sony spoke of running some games at 90 at 4k on PS5 for smoother gameplay compared to 120.)
30 hz = 33.3 milliseconds for frame-generation (playable for typical gaming at non-pro level, but bad for pros/first-person shooters, and not ideal for simracing). 7.5 frames per reaction.
60 hz = 16.6 ms (good for all gaming, other than pros/first-person shooters). 15 frames per reaction.
120 hz = 8.3 ms (cut-off point for pro-gaming and simracing, etc.). 30 frames per reaction.
144 hz = 6.9 ms (slightly better than 120 hz). 36 frames per reaction.
240 hz = 4.1 ms (max pro-level first-person shooter gaming, and not much improvement for other gaming -- and massive cost/hardware drain). 61 frames per reaction.
360 hz = 2.7 ms (cutting-edge monitor hz as of 2021, but not really playable yet. Only slightly better than 240 hz, and not worth it for non-pros or normal games). 92 frames per reaction.
720 hz = 1.3 ms (may exist by 2024 or so, as we will already see 480 hz monitors by 2022-2023). 192 frames per reaction.
1000 hz = 1 ms (may be the upper-limit. I saw a report claiming that 1000 hz monitors will exist by 2025). 250 frames per reaction (perfect 1:1 mapping of frames per millisecond of reaction time, with post-1000 hz being sub-1 ms frame-generation, which is most likely useless, since the brain cannot process faster than 1 ms at all). (I will also add the upper-limit of the brain is 1000 FPS (since this is the limit at which your myelinated nerves can fire), but subjects can really only process to 200 FPS, which is akin to real-life motion, according to some experts.)
Holy shit, 240hz makes 144hz look choppy xD
@JustAllow While the human eye can see the difference, the problem isn't so much what your eye can see, but what your rig can output. Unless your rig can output more than 144 fps on the games you play, there is absolutely no benefit to a 240 hz monitor, except for maybe watching videos recorded at 240 hz or something along those lines... but that's not the point of a gaming monitor... is it?
*After you finally have enough money to get 240hz monitor* : ‘Nah man 240hz is what you at least need. While in 240hz you will not spot any lag at all! And while in 144hz, it feels the same as 60 hz’
Human pc gamer eye can see 60+ fps.
Console "gamer" eye can see 30 fps.
About 25 years ago, people said the human eye can't see past 30 frames per second, so no reason to use 60 frames per second. About 25 years ago, people said the human eye can't see past 30 hz and that 60hz was more than enough. 25 years ago I was using 120hz refresh rates at 120 fps on CRT monitors. Now how many people know what a CRT monitor actually is?
Now a day: People are comparing 60 hz vs 240hz and learning what us original OG gamers knew 25 years ago.
240Hz UltraWide 4k with Freesync, Flicker free, minimum or no bleed, 10βιτ and100% sRGB gamut? Ill see you in 10 years!
no point in 4k freesync
Make that AdobeRGB.
7 years later we have 240hz 4k Ultrawide with Freesync, almost no flickering, 10 bit color, HDR 1000, and like 99% srgb
IDK why but the lack of sound is deafening
if your monitor has a higher refresh rate,you will be seeing every object move on the screen quicker than others,if your ping is fine too.high hz monitors are ideal for gaming, if you're planning on getting one,but don't have budget, get a 75hz monitor.
"But the human eye cant see above 24 fps anyway"
Say the peasants
When you play on a potato and 60 frames feels great to you lolol
240 is unnoticeable, 144 is the sweet spot for me
I have a *144Hz* monitor and guess what?
There is no difference between 144Hz and 60Hz
lmao it's a joke, 60Hz stinks like shit in front of 144Hz 😂😂
Lol, then is cause you still on 60hz with It...learn how to configure the screen....the diference is huge
@@kimera13adr lol I know the difference is huge. My comment was actually a joke, click on read more 👍
Spoiled kids spending their parents money for a few extra frames on CS:GO
peasant's tears, delicious
This is so true I recently when from 60hz to 240hz and I'm amazed on how such things make a difference especially if you're playing comp games. I suggest to all you low hz people MOVE UP IT IS WORTH EVERY DOLLAR I GOT INSANELY CRACKED ON GAMES BECASUE OF IT.
But what if you're watching this on a 60hz monitor?
Rayyan Zaman Thats why it is in slow montion
Keen Colios wtf?
It's a RUclips video. It plays at 60fps regardless
I think more than 144 is not really worth it in 2019 ...
120hz with 5ms or below response time is the sweet spot
*watching this in 75hz"
Nop, in 50 not 75
The difference between 120hz and 144hz seems to be bigger than between 144hz and 240hz lol
I have a 27" 2k monitor 144 hz refresh rate and a gtx 950, but i cant really see the 144hz, and it gives me eye strain on certain games like borderlands 2, im wondering if i need to fuss with settings more, see if im running it right. Should i turn V sync on as well? I also have an i5 6600k and 16gb ram
Oh also do i need a framerate of 144 to see the refresh rate smoothness? That might be the problem if so because ive been running 60fps 144hz
Yeah. Thats the problem