You can't really see the 100 fps if the video is recorded at 60 fps or if the person viewing the video doesn't have at least 100hz monitor. 100 fps does really look better than 60, especially when you are used to what 60 looks like and then you switch over. But it is a little more subtle.
@@sarpkacmaz5910 Yup. But some people, for unknown reasons to me, apparently aren't able to make their brains capture the information fluidly with 30fps. They see a "lag" in the image. I don't know if this is a virtue, or a flaw. But sure as hell, either way, I prefer to be one of those who don't see the difference between 30 and 60.
@@robertoj.9509 You realize more fps=less latency right? Thats why most people hate DLSS 3 Frame generation which Doubles the frame rate but increase latency
@@ForceInEvHorizon You realize there are people playing at 30, being great gamers, and not noticing the difference, right? The latency from 30 to 60 is different than the latency of an online game. The latency you're speaking of is actually something you can get used to. Which is why it's so easy to play games in Switch and WIIU, platforms that were famous for having almost every game at 30fps. There was no latency whatsoever, but a different way to press an input. Some people noticed the difference, others don't. Even in shooters, you see the whole animation, and you react to that animation. When compared the two monitors, there's no delay in the reaction. Put a 30 fps vs a 60 fps video, running from point a to point b, in a lapse of 30 seconds, and both objects will arrive the same spot at the same time. What you're losing between those two comparisons are small, tiny details that are completely unnecessary for your gameplay if your brain is capable of reading between lines. If your brain doesn't, then you need those extra frames. The reason behind that is that some people's brain are quick to pick up information and adapt to what they're seeing, and others need more information (60-144fps) to receive that information and make logic of what they perceive. Or let's not say logic, but to capture a fluid image of what they're seeing. That's exactly why you have people noticing the 60 and others who don't. Now, question would be: "What do you prefer?" Me, from my perspective, I prefer not noticing. I literally can plain between 30 and 60 and not seeing the difference. I only start to see a tiny difference at 22-24.
For the 5fps, I was counting the frames (not hard to do) and it was probably closer to 5 frames per 2 seconds. Even if I'm off some, it was certainly not 5fps.
That happens because the refresh rate of the video is not synced with the frame rate of the screen, the game is 5fps but the screen is still refreshing at 60Hz that may cause some "disappearing" frames
@@almeida0000 a 60 hz screen should display every frame of a 5 fps input without dropping anything. Every 6th refresh would be a new frame. It's just a half assed video, the guy literally showed 2 fps gameplay instead of 5 fps.
The first time I completed the game on 10fps....full game, without any cheats or mods 😂 Then after that I played the game on 30fps and it looked like 120fps to my eyes after playing with 10fps for long time 😂😂😂
this was me but with the minecraft sky factory modpack average of 10 fps with spikes as low as 0 this was because i was on a laptop and back then i was a bit bad but could still get the occasional win in pvp at this framerate and then once i got to playing pvp on an actual desktop i IMMEDIATELY got much better lol
@@danielkarbowiak1710 i used to play at 14-15 fps. If u start gaming like this then it won't bother u at all, and u will have all the fun u need. I was always amazed at people who would say 14-15 fps was unplayable, far from it. It's just that once u are used to "mainstream" Fps like 30 or 60,u find it really uncomfortable to play with 14-15 fps
I had a Celeron 1005M laptop with integrated graphics and 4gb ram and the experience was so painful. 800x600 with 50% frame scaling (400x300) at the lowest settings and I had 15 fps. Now I have an RTX 3060 laptop with 16gb of ram and 5th gen ryzen 5 and I can play with 100+ fps at 1080p highest settings (no advanced settings turned on) even with 1,25x frame scaling
I don't think this is a good example, fps difference is mostly noticable with sidewards motion in small rooms and rotation, because there the whole scenery is moving fast. Maybe that sounds weird for some, but if you look at 60 fps on 2:27 for example and imagine how fast those polls would go across the screen if you were to just turn 90 degress while standing infront of them, then you'd notice that it is way faster than going next to them with a car in GTA. With sideways motion a 2 meter distant wall is obviously gonna cross the screen faster than a mountain at 2km distance.I remember playing on an intel APU laptop and trying to rotate as least as possible (like going straight, turning 90° to the right and going straight foward again, instead of doing curves, because it was extremely stuttery at what I would now estimate 15 fps) The problem with "fast" motion by driving is, that the motion gets faster the closer it is to you, so basicallly only the road directly beneath you and trees and polls already passing by.
The problem is small objects moving fast. This is mainly a problem in flying shooters, so very rare. Even there, with motion blur a comparable small framerate is fine.
I was playing in GTA V on my old PC (2011) with HD 7850 and phenom II 1090T with 8GB RAM, that was not so bad for me, so many hrs of memories *.* But on RTX 3060 i5 12400f and 16 GB RAM this game look like something new :P U take some u lost some, feel is good but not the same like on 30 fps, that was epic
I played with a Phenom x2 550Be and a Radeon HD 6950. I had only 20-24FPS. And at the beginning the message my pc did not meet the minimum requirements but for that it went surprisingly well
The difference between 20fps and 24fps is amazing. While 20fps would be the absolute minimum I'd want to play any game with, 30fps is where things really start getting "smooth." It seems to me, that unless you're playing first person shooters, 60 fps is more than enough for anything.
I played my first GTA V (pirate version) 2-3 playthroughs with 10-20fps somewhere around 2014-2015 I believe - it was fun but really REALLY *REALLY* slow, and Istill enjoyed the game very much. After I bought the game from steam in 2015 when it was officially released I got to around 40-60fps that was huge fps rise.
@@AnimMouse Well, I simply failed to remember the date when it was published to PC, and all I remembered was the original date when GTA V was released.
@@AnimMouse And now when you reminded me about the release date - I remember that the Pirate version I downloaded was available way before it was originally released to PC, and I believe this is the reason why it was so Laggy. I played GTA V story on PC about 2 or 3 times before it was officially released on PC
Even though I think a higher framerate really does look better, the more important thing is the frame timing. Higher framerate = lower frame timing = faster responsiveness.
Yes, that's the only reason to care about frame rates much about 25fps. But, the benefits can be a bit iffy if you're playing over the net with a server that adjusts things to make them match up with what you expect.
@@LukeLane1984 I do think that it's still a good point, but a lot of people don't realize that on a lot of games that the computer will do some math to account for where you were when you took the shot versus where the bullet would have wound up if you hadn't had the lag. It's actually pretty impressive. Still, you likely would benefit from seeing whatever it is as soon as that packet hits your computer.
Years ago we were all playing games on our ps2 or Xbox 360 at sub 30 fps and it was amazing, now everybody is arguing you need at least 60 for it to be playable. People need to stop whining and just enjoy a game
60-80 fps the sweetest spot for me. Anything over 60 fps gives smoothest experience. 1080p high at 60 FPS is what I want my laptop to run all the games at
This video is perfect for those console fanboys saying that the human eye can't see above 24 FPS and why framerate is much more important than eyecandy. Great job, buddy!
For me 30 fps is enough. I like more better graphics. So i always run the games in 4k and with my 1070GTX i can get normally 25-50 fps. Textures quality and sight are always at maximum, the rest depends on the game. For example in the nextgen WItcher i had between 25-35fps and it was looking great an also much fun to play.
@@TheCsabi86below 20? Thats a bit too much, is it? Have a little pity on yourself. I’m sure the game would look just as good if you lower some settings.
Nice video. In fact, lower fps players focus and try so hard to reach mission instanly. Than become more fps, so you become start to doing sh*t in game. Becouse you have time.
20 fps ainda fica um pouco travado, o olho começa a ver a ilusão de movimento a partir dos 23.97 fps, que é o que o padrão da indústria de filmes utilizam nos cinemas.
na real de 15 pra cima ja fica mais tranquilo ainda mais se o fps ficar travado, ja abaixo de 15 é bem ruim mesmo. mas tambem vai depender do jogo, tem jogo q mesmo com fps baixo fica tranquilo de jogar ja outros abaixo de 60 ou 30 fica uma merda. inclusive jogos bem antigos rodavam com fps bem baixo, uma dica q dou é tentar acelerar o jogo usando cheat engine por exemplo, ja fiz isso em alguns jogos e funcionou bem em outros fica pior ou não acontece nada.
1 FPS isn’t playable? You want to try playing Fsllout New Vegas Ultimate Edition on the ps3 after you’ve played around 250 hours plus. I could only dream of 1 frame per second then, more often I’d get a frame every 5-10 seconds! I’m happy with 20fps, 10 is playable but probably a little frustrating but I guess it depends on the game.
@@solarprakhyat6545 But what's the difference? I know FPS = frames per second, so it has to do with game fluidity etc... BUT STILL! I see no noticeable difference between 30 and 100 FPS...
100 FPS has way less blurry pictures in fast moving scenes compared to 60 FPS. I learned that the average human vision is around 60 FPS, so in other words, 100 FPS is just 60 FPS with clear and sharp visual in fast moving scenes, thus giving an illusion of smoother motion
This is a good comparison for people who are not in the know. I am currently running my play on a solid 60fps and its all it really needs for standard play. On the enhanced edition of GTAV online the game for me runs as good as flawlessly, the movement is fluid, when the graphics are turned up to max it is good enough to be supported with 60fps I know this because I play it every night. Its good enough for video and play alike. Good video bro. ❤
One of the most optimised game for Pc.... Nearly all modern pc can run it in good setting and 30+ fps... No need to be expensive.❤️❤️❤️❤️ Btw my lappy runs it at beautiful 1080p ultra at 70+ fps. Advanced graphics full too❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
Are eyes don’t see in fps but if we were to convert it our eyes can only see up to 60fps so you wont be able to tell the difference between 60fps and 100fps
2:23 This video have helped me understand more about fps. Here you can see everything moved more fluid and smoother ( surrounding and other vehicles at 60 fps) The 30 fps on the other hand felt as it's not 100% smooth when you compare side by side with the 60 fps. It's only 95% smooth Having a low end gpu, I have to play Cyberpunk at 30 fps on a 7 years old laptop at 1080p. My video is up if anyone is interested to see how play triple-A games on an old laptop with GTX 1050-Ti.
The 5 fps reminds me of when I tried Age of Empires 3 with 7 opponents and when the NPCs had their villages in the 3rd era. There were a few small armies running around in the black area, it still worked when I had most of my people on one island. As soon as I tried to mine things with a few people on the mainland and two three armies came by, then things really went into the basement, with the fps. It was on an AMD X2 6000+ and 2 GByte + 1 Gbyte upgradet DDR2 Ram and HD3650 with 512MByte GDDR2, the game was from 2005 and Most of my PC was from 2007 as a budget PC bought in September 2008. My then new GPU HD6850 Cyclone in 2011 didn't make things any better, it was bored. My i7 4790k eats the game for breakfast and is bored with it. It was a very satisfying feeling to start the game for the first time and expect that it won't defeat my PC.
The days of playing games like Crysis and Far Cry 2 at 26fps.... Then finally upgrading my pc in 2013 and realizing how much smoother **everything** was at 60+ fps... Good times
I have a question, I noticed that above 25 fps or 30 fps , the game runs pretty normally. 60 fps are smooth but what's the point adding more fps to your PC? Will you notice the huge difference? I am asking because in my whole life, I played with 30 to 60 fps . Sometimes from internet cafes I could play with 100+ fps . But what's the point to add more fps? Since it's already smooth from 60? I noticed a lot of my friends complaining that their fps are low while they have like 100+ fps and wanting more . Meanwhile me , I am just happy with my 60 fps
The higher your FPS, the lower the latency will be. So when you press a button on your keyboard/controller the game will respond quicker to your inputs. Also the perceived smoothness and visual information on higher refresh rate monitors is greater. But of course, displaying 60+ FPS requires a monitor with a higher refresh rate than 60Hz. If you display 100+ FPS on a 60Hz monitor, you'll only be viewing 60 FPS as it's the monitor's limit (60Hz = 60FPS max).
@@stickergamer I knew about the monitor but thanks for the first part . Its just sometimes I can't understand my friends wanting even more fps , they have enough to make a man satisfy 😂💀
@@stickergamer It doesnt require it to feel a difference. The same applies on a 60hz monitor. You just see less frames due to the 60hz, but always the most up to date one which makes it despite the 60hz already feel much smoother on uncapped fps. And of course the inputs benefit stays too.
@@De-M-oN You're right, 60+ FPS on 60hz panel will always feel smoother even though only 60 frames are being displayed. The problem with running at an uncapped framerate on a 60hz panel is that tearing will occur though, but nowadays you can use Nvidia's fast-sync or AMD's Enhanced Sync to eliminate that.
In my experience, 37-47 FPS is the lowest for both a playable and fun experience in GTA V. 57-60 would be the ideal range. Anything above 60 is perfect, obviously. But I have played GTA V with fps between 15 - 27, so I know how terrible the game can be too. Still, I played 2 hours worth of GTA V's Campaign on 15 - 22 FPS on a Dual Core CPU and 760mb Vram PC back when it first launched on PC. I would never recommend that, but I still had fun.
I think 50 or 60 fps is more than enough, anything over that is just overkill, game developers could use that processing power for more enhanced graphics as opposed to higher frame rates, just my personal opinion...
game development doesnt work like that. on pc everyone has different hardware which is way game developers let us change how the game looks so it can perform well for everyone's hardware. you cant just design it for 60 fps.
As someone who was around when console games ran at about 24-30 fps at 576i PAL res on crt displays, I'd say a locked 30 fps is doable in slower paced single player games. 60fps is where things become smooth but there's still some ghosting. The next noticeable threshold is 90 fps, that's easily distinguishable from 60. 120 fps and up is ultra smooth.
The kuruma is in v as well, it's quite popular due to having a armoured variant, but I dont see it as much anymore because the night shark is better and everyone uses that now In gtao
if it gets stuck at 20 fps after a while it's fine, I've played games at 20fps. but it will also depend on the game, some below 60 are unplayable others can play up to 17-18fps.
Remember guys, if your monitor only has 60 hz, 100 FPS will look the exact same as 60 FPS, because the max FPS of your monitor is 60. It cant show 100 FPS. Also, the Video is rendered in 60 FPS, so it doesnt matter anyway💀
How to Speed Up Computer Performance in Windows 11/10/8/7: bit.ly/4eCIhcf
Real-Time AI Voice Changer
Online Games/Discord:bit.ly/3zYYidl
You can't really see the 100 fps if the video is recorded at 60 fps or if the person viewing the video doesn't have at least 100hz monitor. 100 fps does really look better than 60, especially when you are used to what 60 looks like and then you switch over. But it is a little more subtle.
30 fps is enough.
@@sarpkacmaz5910 Yup. But some people, for unknown reasons to me, apparently aren't able to make their brains capture the information fluidly with 30fps. They see a "lag" in the image. I don't know if this is a virtue, or a flaw. But sure as hell, either way, I prefer to be one of those who don't see the difference between 30 and 60.
@@sarpkacmaz5910 lol no. You're coping if u think 30fps is enough. 60 is the bare minimum anything below that is trash (except 48FPS VRR)
@@robertoj.9509 You realize more fps=less latency right? Thats why most people hate DLSS 3 Frame generation which Doubles the frame rate but increase latency
@@ForceInEvHorizon You realize there are people playing at 30, being great gamers, and not noticing the difference, right?
The latency from 30 to 60 is different than the latency of an online game. The latency you're speaking of is actually something you can get used to. Which is why it's so easy to play games in Switch and WIIU, platforms that were famous for having almost every game at 30fps. There was no latency whatsoever, but a different way to press an input. Some people noticed the difference, others don't. Even in shooters, you see the whole animation, and you react to that animation. When compared the two monitors, there's no delay in the reaction.
Put a 30 fps vs a 60 fps video, running from point a to point b, in a lapse of 30 seconds, and both objects will arrive the same spot at the same time. What you're losing between those two comparisons are small, tiny details that are completely unnecessary for your gameplay if your brain is capable of reading between lines. If your brain doesn't, then you need those extra frames.
The reason behind that is that some people's brain are quick to pick up information and adapt to what they're seeing, and others need more information (60-144fps) to receive that information and make logic of what they perceive. Or let's not say logic, but to capture a fluid image of what they're seeing.
That's exactly why you have people noticing the 60 and others who don't.
Now, question would be: "What do you prefer?" Me, from my perspective, I prefer not noticing. I literally can plain between 30 and 60 and not seeing the difference. I only start to see a tiny difference at 22-24.
I have completed this game 2 times at 18 FPS.
All of that blood sweat and tears, I hereby congratulate you in your efforts and patients for beating the game that way :)
I played also with that fps. It's painful.
I did it too
On intel hd520 graphics
But now am planning it again on my rtx at 100+ fps
Lmao I've beaten it 3 times with the same fps
@@LeviAckerman57551 yes i am the only one who have intel hd 3000 and still not downloaded it
For the 5fps, I was counting the frames (not hard to do) and it was probably closer to 5 frames per 2 seconds. Even if I'm off some, it was certainly not 5fps.
And the 10fps is also lower than 10 fps actually.
That happens because the refresh rate of the video is not synced with the frame rate of the screen, the game is 5fps but the screen is still refreshing at 60Hz that may cause some "disappearing" frames
@@almeida0000 a 60 hz screen should display every frame of a 5 fps input without dropping anything. Every 6th refresh would be a new frame. It's just a half assed video, the guy literally showed 2 fps gameplay instead of 5 fps.
The supposed "10 fps" was actually 5 fps, i counted. "5 fps" was 2 fps. Dumbass OP had one job, how do you fuck this up?
@chonky9149 It's not even close though. It's 100% a half-ass video, as was mentioned.
The video is 60fps so you won't see any difference above 60 on RUclips until they support high fps footage
100 is smoother no matter what
@@lentak779 You can't view 100fps on RUclips
@@drewhender3999some dumb people will never understand that...
it can just speed up 2x
It's worse because the frame times don't sink up.
5 fps remind me a friend of mine who used to play gta IV like that back in the day 😂
I think the 5 fps are 2 and 10 fps are 5 fps in this video. The others are right
I was that friend that played like that
same bruh
Lol bandicam and unregistered hypercam
Back in the day? It still runs at that FPS today, with up to date high end hardware! :D
1 fps is actual phototaking gameplay
It's just a slideshow of pictures 🤣
gta street view
I mean all of them are just photos being taken really fast per second but 1 FPS you can see it photo it.
Walking in google maps
1:12 People with GT710 and Intel HD graphics : that's really good fps
I used to have one
I still have the GT710 and in GTA 5 it goes to 40 FPS
@@loquenderogta3770 what res ? 720p, 900p ?
@@nishantkr5759 1920x1080 in low
@@loquenderogta3770 have you tried going to mount chiliad ?
Check fps there mate. 710 will drop the fps to 15-20 fps
30 fps is actually decent for story mode but if you're playing online it's better to play it with 60 fps
Los ps4 van a 30fps y va todo bien.
@@RUN_RD English pls
@@muadz1204 translate: the PS4 move the game at 30 fps
@@vick_real i play on PC so i know nothing about ps4
@@muadz1204 no importa donde juegues los FPS son los mismo en cualquier plataforma
The first time I completed the game on 10fps....full game, without any cheats or mods 😂
Then after that I played the game on 30fps and it looked like 120fps to my eyes after playing with 10fps for long time 😂😂😂
Ur eye adapt for fps
@@fernandonando8461 yes true
Must have been a shitty time cant imagine playing that on 10fps 😂 did it even make fun?
this was me but with the minecraft sky factory modpack average of 10 fps with spikes as low as 0
this was because i was on a laptop and back then i was a bit bad but could still get the occasional win in pvp at this framerate and then once i got to playing pvp on an actual desktop i IMMEDIATELY got much better lol
@@danielkarbowiak1710 i used to play at 14-15 fps. If u start gaming like this then it won't bother u at all, and u will have all the fun u need. I was always amazed at people who would say 14-15 fps was unplayable, far from it. It's just that once u are used to "mainstream" Fps like 30 or 60,u find it really uncomfortable to play with 14-15 fps
I used to play it on my old pc in 20 fps in 800x600 window.
What an experience it was
I had a Celeron 1005M laptop with integrated graphics and 4gb ram and the experience was so painful. 800x600 with 50% frame scaling (400x300) at the lowest settings and I had 15 fps. Now I have an RTX 3060 laptop with 16gb of ram and 5th gen ryzen 5 and I can play with 100+ fps at 1080p highest settings (no advanced settings turned on) even with 1,25x frame scaling
What were the specs of the computer that you played on?
Im now playing gta 5 again after all those years but now on my 8k pc it feels 1000times better than ps3,ps4
20 fps is pretty manageable tbh
@@DeyuAndreyu1080?Dude for the 3060 is like waving your hand.
Me after playing it at 0fps:
"wow the 1 fps gameplay looks great where can I get that much"
Video: 5FPS is not playable.
00s kid with an old Windows 98 PC trying to play Crysis: Are you challenging me?
WOW WOW WOW It's very Amazing and Fantastic video ✌🏻😎👍🏻✨
**Laughs in playing GTA V at 24fps 10 years ago on Xbox 360**
No It was never un 24 fps.
@@Devilzinhoo Just watch the digital foundry fps test. It definitely ran under 24 sometimes
@@DevilzinhooYeah I agree but sometimes it could.
@@Devilzinhoo the game ran 20-27 fps on that console barely touching 30fps
@@aganbraganca4156how about PS3 how did the game perform there
I don't think this is a good example, fps difference is mostly noticable with sidewards motion in small rooms and rotation, because there the whole scenery is moving fast. Maybe that sounds weird for some, but if you look at 60 fps on 2:27 for example and imagine how fast those polls would go across the screen if you were to just turn 90 degress while standing infront of them, then you'd notice that it is way faster than going next to them with a car in GTA. With sideways motion a 2 meter distant wall is obviously gonna cross the screen faster than a mountain at 2km distance.I remember playing on an intel APU laptop and trying to rotate as least as possible (like going straight, turning 90° to the right and going straight foward again, instead of doing curves, because it was extremely stuttery at what I would now estimate 15 fps)
The problem with "fast" motion by driving is, that the motion gets faster the closer it is to you, so basicallly only the road directly beneath you and trees and polls already passing by.
In this game biggest killer of fps is grass which is badly optimized n shadows both these together it makes heavy fps drop.
The problem is small objects moving fast. This is mainly a problem in flying shooters, so very rare.
Even there, with motion blur a comparable small framerate is fine.
I was playing in GTA V on my old PC (2011) with HD 7850 and phenom II 1090T with 8GB RAM, that was not so bad for me, so many hrs of memories *.*
But on RTX 3060 i5 12400f and 16 GB RAM this game look like something new :P U take some u lost some, feel is good but not the same like on 30 fps, that was epic
I have same specs but rtx 3070 ti and yes you are right my friend.
@@predaddy i have an amd ryzen 7 5700x and a 3070ti too,its great with a 240hz curved monitor
uhh, i did not understand a single word that you said at the end of what you said...
I played with a Phenom x2 550Be and a Radeon HD 6950. I had only 20-24FPS. And at the beginning the message my pc did not meet the minimum requirements but for that it went surprisingly well
Damn
27 Minutes ago from:Philippines 🇵🇭🥰
Or a year ago
30-45 fps is called playable
15-20 fps is playable
No@@papol.
Personally i think 26-31 playable
13fps was playable for me when i was kid
@@V.G0590you are picky and needy
The difference between 20fps and 24fps is amazing. While 20fps would be the absolute minimum I'd want to play any game with, 30fps is where things really start getting "smooth." It seems to me, that unless you're playing first person shooters, 60 fps is more than enough for anything.
I played my first GTA V (pirate version) 2-3 playthroughs with 10-20fps somewhere around 2014-2015 I believe - it was fun but really REALLY *REALLY* slow, and Istill enjoyed the game very much.
After I bought the game from steam in 2015 when it was officially released I got to around 40-60fps that was huge fps rise.
2013? PC version was released on 2015, and jailbroken consoles work better than 10-20 fps.
@@AnimMouse Well, I simply failed to remember the date when it was published to PC, and all I remembered was the original date when GTA V was released.
@@AnimMouse And now when you reminded me about the release date - I remember that the Pirate version I downloaded was available way before it was originally released to PC, and I believe this is the reason why it was so Laggy. I played GTA V story on PC about 2 or 3 times before it was officially released on PC
@@AnimMouse And yes - it was around 10-20fps with my PC with lowest graphics back then, and in the city the fps was the lowest.
Even though I think a higher framerate really does look better, the more important thing is the frame timing. Higher framerate = lower frame timing = faster responsiveness.
Yes, that's the only reason to care about frame rates much about 25fps. But, the benefits can be a bit iffy if you're playing over the net with a server that adjusts things to make them match up with what you expect.
@@SmallSpoonBrigade Good point.
@@LukeLane1984 I do think that it's still a good point, but a lot of people don't realize that on a lot of games that the computer will do some math to account for where you were when you took the shot versus where the bullet would have wound up if you hadn't had the lag. It's actually pretty impressive.
Still, you likely would benefit from seeing whatever it is as soon as that packet hits your computer.
That 100 fps looks smoother than my hair 💯
Years ago we were all playing games on our ps2 or Xbox 360 at sub 30 fps and it was amazing, now everybody is arguing you need at least 60 for it to be playable. People need to stop whining and just enjoy a game
60-80 fps the sweetest spot for me. Anything over 60 fps gives smoothest experience. 1080p high at 60 FPS is what I want my laptop to run all the games at
I legit can't see any real difference past 30 and barely noticed any difference between 20, 24 and 30
smooth camera rotation. you can see
Set your playback quality to 1080p60
@@sanggarsuryalukista7707 doesnt matter. My brain isnt capable to make a difference too. Saves me a lot of money.
@@UltimateQball I can't, not everyone's eyes and brains are made the same my guy.
@@sanggarsuryalukista7707 Doesn't change anything, some people are built different than others.
With 30fps you can already play, of course not perfect but playable. Great video! Thank you!
Xbox 360 and PS3 can run GTA 5 at 30 FPS without us noticing 😳
Definitely not ps3...it's somewhat at 28 fps
Gta 5 runs at 30 fps on ps4 and xbox one too.
I play it on 360 still so I know.
@@sdp640 Both PS3 and 360 versions of GTA 5 can reach 30 fps but they're often less than that.
I had the game in PS3 then bought it angain for PC, the difference was big.
24 fps is just what we see watching movies, so yes - 24 fps is enough
Just cuz movies use it doesnt mean its enough. 24 is awful to play with
@@Terjecs Only because of input delay
lol input lag
0:36 this is 2FPS not 5
edit
0:55 and this is 3FPS not 10.
Fun fact : Game is playable when it runs 😂
Me chilling with 30 fps because of vsync
V sync gives me 60fps
vsync gives 60 everytime bec there isn't 30 hz monitor
@@xxmichaelmodzxxthere is... there even 24hz monitors
This video is perfect for those console fanboys saying that the human eye can't see above 24 FPS and why framerate is much more important than eyecandy. Great job, buddy!
This was the first game where I felt 60fps. I spend some good hours min-maxing my graphics for it to run beautiful and smooth on my deceased GTX 760
Hii
deceased? explain?
@@TakeCareOfYourself24434The GTX 760 died/failed/stopped working. Pretty obvious?
@@jkkay477 take care of yourself bro
For me 30 fps is enough. I like more better graphics. So i always run the games in 4k and with my 1070GTX i can get normally 25-50 fps. Textures quality and sight are always at maximum, the rest depends on the game. For example in the nextgen WItcher i had between 25-35fps and it was looking great an also much fun to play.
I usually do the same, sacrifice fpses for better quality, even if the fps simetimes drops below 20.
@@TheCsabi86below 20? Thats a bit too much, is it? Have a little pity on yourself. I’m sure the game would look just as good if you lower some settings.
@@kilgore1863yep there is barely any difference between High and ultra settings in every games. So I always go high than waste my fps on ultra.
You are insane, fluid gameplay is always better. Rip your eyes and head when you cross 30 years.
yes i can totally see the difference from 60fps to 100 fps in a 60fps video and using a 60hz monitor
😂
Filmed on a potato 🥔 😭😭 lol
0:10 bro play on powerpoint💀
😂
0:36 "Yeah I played GTA 5 on PC as a kid"
You're doing a good video, by the way I have 40 fps too huh
30 isn't that bad... It's 100% the BARE MINIMUM if you want to enjoy a game.
From what I am seeing you want more then 30 fps. But 20 looked ok. Nice video mate.
30fps is like a movie
60fps it starts to look like soap opera for me.
0:48 man i love spiderverse
10 years later still trying to go beyond 7fps 😂😂
😆😩😩😩
latam
Nice video.
In fact, lower fps players focus and try so hard to reach mission instanly.
Than become more fps, so you become start to doing sh*t in game. Becouse you have time.
Even my old laptop give me 60 fps lol
But what about the quality of the graphics?
Nice to see that any thing above 20 doesn't add real value
60 fps is standard gaming now
Once I got above 20 FPS I didn't notice much of a difference anymore.
@@gefryfostuvi2184 Online competitive gaming its all the difference
Nah, I'll stick to 10
@@gefryfostuvi2184 once you start playing 60fps you will feel the difference
Once it gets to 20FPS I honestly can't see a difference.
For me, 24 FPS gives me a more moviesque feel. I like it
that’s the fps that movies record in, everything else is too smooth!
If people would see someone playing on 1 FPS: Are you trying to play on photo?
Pelo vídeo vc chega a conclusão que todo jogo se torna jogável a partir dos 20 Fps.
My Xbox 360 run gta 5 at 20 - 30 fps
@@jokojr100dl então 20 Fps é o mínimo considerável pra jogar, abaixo disso o jogo fica muito bugado e até desanima jogar.
20 fps ainda fica um pouco travado, o olho começa a ver a ilusão de movimento a partir dos 23.97 fps, que é o que o padrão da indústria de filmes utilizam nos cinemas.
na real de 15 pra cima ja fica mais tranquilo ainda mais se o fps ficar travado, ja abaixo de 15 é bem ruim mesmo. mas tambem vai depender do jogo, tem jogo q mesmo com fps baixo fica tranquilo de jogar ja outros abaixo de 60 ou 30 fica uma merda.
inclusive jogos bem antigos rodavam com fps bem baixo, uma dica q dou é tentar acelerar o jogo usando cheat engine por exemplo, ja fiz isso em alguns jogos e funcionou bem em outros fica pior ou não acontece nada.
@@dajymadashiro mas eu digo de acordo com o vídeo, ali só mostra 10 e já pula pro 20 Fps.
Great video 😎🤟🏻👍🏻
Can GTA 5 run well on 4GB RAM 30 FPS? I hope someone will answer from their personal experience
Idk whats your pc spec for more
4gb is enough to get 30fps sir
Intel (R) Core (TM) i5-7200U CPU@ 2,50 GHz 2712 Mhz 2 Cores 4 Logical processors. Will this do?
Thanks for prior reply before
@@grizzlybear1 Would be interesting if you make a comparison video about RAM performance on GTA 5 :D
@@yosuasebastian Maybe... Yes But sometimes will be drop one time
Good video! What about the 40FPS? 😚
1 FPS isn’t playable? You want to try playing Fsllout New Vegas Ultimate Edition on the ps3 after you’ve played around 250 hours plus. I could only dream of 1 frame per second then, more often I’d get a frame every 5-10 seconds!
I’m happy with 20fps, 10 is playable but probably a little frustrating but I guess it depends on the game.
i was used to play this game at 10-15 fps on 800x600 video size. so painful experience but finished all missions anyway...
If i'm not wrong 30 fps is basically the ps4 fps if i'm not wrong.
Yes
Yes my brother played on the ps4 of his friend he said it was shit
@@solarprakhyat6545 But what's the difference? I know FPS = frames per second, so it has to do with game fluidity etc... BUT STILL! I see no noticeable difference between 30 and 100 FPS...
@@giuliobarbera6227 RUclips only supports upto 60 fps
@@sgtFROSTop Same, not much difference to me from 30 to 60 FPS (what's the point of showing 100 FPS at the end, then?)...
you should show all clips above 60 fps in slow motion comparison so we can really see those frames
If working with 1fps PC will boom 💥
Don't forget to change the repetition rate of the video to 60Hz.
With a good motion blur, the motion looks fluent at about half of the fps.
Imagine having a PC with 64 RAM and leaving the game's graphics on low, everything will run at 10000 FPS
1 fps: McDonald's Wi-Fi
100 FPS has way less blurry pictures in fast moving scenes compared to 60 FPS. I learned that the average human vision is around 60 FPS, so in other words, 100 FPS is just 60 FPS with clear and sharp visual in fast moving scenes, thus giving an illusion of smoother motion
Pretty sure that's not how eyesight works
As casual GTA player i know i played this game at movie FPS
Lol his 20 fps are way smoother than my 30 😂
This is a good comparison for people who are not in the know. I am currently running my play on a solid 60fps and its all it really needs for standard play. On the enhanced edition of GTAV online the game for me runs as good as flawlessly, the movement is fluid, when the graphics are turned up to max it is good enough to be supported with 60fps I know this because I play it every night. Its good enough for video and play alike. Good video bro. ❤
Im glad you’ve clarified the characters in the video were fictional I was almost beginning to think they were real people
One of the most optimised game for Pc.... Nearly all modern pc can run it in good setting and 30+ fps... No need to be expensive.❤️❤️❤️❤️
Btw my lappy runs it at beautiful 1080p ultra at 70+ fps.
Advanced graphics full too❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
I played all of GTA V on 360 at 30fps. Not a problem. Then again I grew up when 15fps was considered good for a first person 3d game. 🤷🏻♂️
Very similar to me. Plus for me 60 FPS makes it way too fast for my eyes to comprehend, 30 is just right imo
Are eyes don’t see in fps but if we were to convert it our eyes can only see up to 60fps so you wont be able to tell the difference between 60fps and 100fps
2:23 This video have helped me understand more about fps. Here you can see everything moved more fluid and smoother (
surrounding and other vehicles at 60 fps)
The 30 fps on the other hand felt as it's not 100% smooth when you compare side by side with the 60 fps. It's only 95% smooth
Having a low end gpu, I have to play Cyberpunk at 30 fps on a 7 years old laptop at 1080p.
My video is up if anyone is interested to see how play triple-A games on an old laptop with GTX 1050-Ti.
My laptop is 4 years old but it has MX 150 💀
The 5 fps reminds me of when I tried Age of Empires 3 with 7 opponents and when the NPCs had their villages in the 3rd era.
There were a few small armies running around in the black area, it still worked when I had most of my people on one island.
As soon as I tried to mine things with a few people on the mainland and two three armies came by, then things really went into the basement,
with the fps. It was on an AMD X2 6000+ and 2 GByte + 1 Gbyte upgradet DDR2 Ram and HD3650 with 512MByte GDDR2, the game was from 2005 and Most of my PC was from 2007
as a budget PC bought in September 2008. My then new GPU HD6850 Cyclone in 2011 didn't make things any better, it was bored.
My i7 4790k eats the game for breakfast and is bored with it. It was a very satisfying feeling to start the game for the first time and expect that it won't defeat my PC.
it turns out I passed the game at 20 fps
The days of playing games like Crysis and Far Cry 2 at 26fps.... Then finally upgrading my pc in 2013 and realizing how much smoother **everything** was at 60+ fps... Good times
2:57 lol, not just the fps but the graphic change too
I have a question, I noticed that above 25 fps or 30 fps , the game runs pretty normally. 60 fps are smooth but what's the point adding more fps to your PC? Will you notice the huge difference? I am asking because in my whole life, I played with 30 to 60 fps . Sometimes from internet cafes I could play with 100+ fps . But what's the point to add more fps? Since it's already smooth from 60? I noticed a lot of my friends complaining that their fps are low while they have like 100+ fps and wanting more . Meanwhile me , I am just happy with my 60 fps
The higher your FPS, the lower the latency will be. So when you press a button on your keyboard/controller the game will respond quicker to your inputs.
Also the perceived smoothness and visual information on higher refresh rate monitors is greater. But of course, displaying 60+ FPS requires a monitor with a higher refresh rate than 60Hz. If you display 100+ FPS on a 60Hz monitor, you'll only be viewing 60 FPS as it's the monitor's limit (60Hz = 60FPS max).
@@stickergamer I knew about the monitor but thanks for the first part . Its just sometimes I can't understand my friends wanting even more fps , they have enough to make a man satisfy 😂💀
@@stickergamer It doesnt require it to feel a difference. The same applies on a 60hz monitor. You just see less frames due to the 60hz, but always the most up to date one which makes it despite the 60hz already feel much smoother on uncapped fps. And of course the inputs benefit stays too.
@@De-M-oN You're right, 60+ FPS on 60hz panel will always feel smoother even though only 60 frames are being displayed.
The problem with running at an uncapped framerate on a 60hz panel is that tearing will occur though, but nowadays you can use Nvidia's fast-sync or AMD's Enhanced Sync to eliminate that.
1:04 ps3 experience
After about 25fps I couldn't tell the difference.
In my experience, 37-47 FPS is the lowest for both a playable and fun experience in GTA V. 57-60 would be the ideal range. Anything above 60 is perfect, obviously. But I have played GTA V with fps between 15 - 27, so I know how terrible the game can be too. Still, I played 2 hours worth of GTA V's Campaign on 15 - 22 FPS on a Dual Core CPU and 760mb Vram PC back when it first launched on PC. I would never recommend that, but I still had fun.
30 FPS is completely playable and fun that's how it ran on PS3 and Xbox 360
Let's see the difference between 60 fps and 100 fps in this 60 fps video. Bro, that's a genius move!
with my i3 820m geforce laptop the fps is about 8fps-100fps but idkmy old laptop can handle that
Lets just appreciate him for buying several PCs just to make this video
I think 50 or 60 fps is more than enough, anything over that is just overkill, game developers could use that processing power for more enhanced graphics as opposed to higher frame rates, just my personal opinion...
game development doesnt work like that. on pc everyone has different hardware which is way game developers let us change how the game looks so it can perform well for everyone's hardware. you cant just design it for 60 fps.
30 and 60 fps you can clearly see the difference, now after 60 fps nothing changes, so 30 fps and 60 fps are great for me.
Dude 20fps is enough for me .
OP: *Is testing framerate.*
Also OP: *Uses the slowest car in his garage.* 💀
Imagine you ▶️ GTA 5 200 to 400fps
Le PC : Busted 🤣
POV: Me with my potato laptop playing roblox at 1 fps 💀
So basically 30 fps is enough😹
Fun fact : 1fps and 200fps are the same
Cause, game supports upto 180 fps if you go above that it starts stuttering
As someone who was around when console games ran at about 24-30 fps at 576i PAL res on crt displays, I'd say a locked 30 fps is doable in slower paced single player games. 60fps is where things become smooth but there's still some ghosting. The next noticeable threshold is 90 fps, that's easily distinguishable from 60. 120 fps and up is ultra smooth.
60fps is enough for everything
thats not true. For games like Quake Champions 60fps is way too less
Finally, someone emulated how my pc plays this game
At 2:16 was that car kuruma from gta 3
The kuruma is in v as well, it's quite popular due to having a armoured variant, but I dont see it as much anymore because the night shark is better and everyone uses that now
In gtao
Easter egg by the channel
20th century gamers: 60 FPS vs 120 FPS
90s gamers: 1/2 FPS vs 1 FPS
Я когда играю: 60 фпс так малоо :/
Я когда смотрю сравнение фпс: 20 фпс такие классные
if it gets stuck at 20 fps after a while it's fine, I've played games at 20fps.
but it will also depend on the game, some below 60 are unplayable others can play up to 17-18fps.
Remember guys, if your monitor only has 60 hz, 100 FPS will look the exact same as 60 FPS, because the max FPS of your monitor is 60. It cant show 100 FPS.
Also, the Video is rendered in 60 FPS, so it doesnt matter anyway💀
I play this game with 30 fps✨
Yeah me to
24 Fps Used For Movies
And Its Playable
I'm playing with 60fps 😊