Some did. We have research on this. Others did it because they didn't want to look weak. Others because of political conviction. Others because they wanted to be loyal, but to friends in the army.
there would be more people creating useful code if they had the freedom to pursue it. Also, stop thinking about things in terms of left and right, that's a very simplistic stupid way to view the world.
@@anab0lic Everyone already has "the freedom to pursue" code. Don't pretend for a moment that this is not extremist ideology. It's also not left, but far-left and totalitarian.
@@dimitrioskantakouzinos8590 That simply isn't true, many people don't have access to the tech and/or don't have the time free to self teach themselves, as they work non stop just to make enough to barely survive. There is nothing extreme about wanting to maximize human potential and opportunity for all.... in fact, I would argue its extreme misuse of human resources to supress it. You don't seem to have thought through your opinions too well... and merely throwing around political terms with no real thought or well reasoned arguments to back any of it up.
@@anab0lic Sorry, it's not me who is throwing around slogans as though they were political programs. That would be you. And you think that if you approve of what someone "wants", that individual could not be extreme. Except that if you knew anything of history, you would know that people who are extreme always package their ideology in something that sounds appealing, like "wanting to maximize human potential and opportunity for all". So no, we're not going to accept your radical, crypto-communist ideology packaged as 'opportunity'. In fact, it's people like you who deny people opportunities because they are white or Asian.
The claim that nazis did things for loyalty only sounded like a lot of political bs to me.
It should not be on this channel.
it was loyalty to their comrades.... doesn't seem like you understood what was being said here.
@@anab0lic whatever. I did not subscribe to this channel for this. And I'm giving my feedback.
Some did. We have research on this. Others did it because they didn't want to look weak. Others because of political conviction. Others because they wanted to be loyal, but to friends in the army.
I don't get it. What does a far-left ideologue have to do with coding?
there would be more people creating useful code if they had the freedom to pursue it. Also, stop thinking about things in terms of left and right, that's a very simplistic stupid way to view the world.
@@anab0lic Everyone already has "the freedom to pursue" code. Don't pretend for a moment that this is not extremist ideology. It's also not left, but far-left and totalitarian.
@@dimitrioskantakouzinos8590 That simply isn't true, many people don't have access to the tech and/or don't have the time free to self teach themselves, as they work non stop just to make enough to barely survive. There is nothing extreme about wanting to maximize human potential and opportunity for all.... in fact, I would argue its extreme misuse of human resources to supress it. You don't seem to have thought through your opinions too well... and merely throwing around political terms with no real thought or well reasoned arguments to back any of it up.
@@anab0lic Sorry, it's not me who is throwing around slogans as though they were political programs. That would be you. And you think that if you approve of what someone "wants", that individual could not be extreme. Except that if you knew anything of history, you would know that people who are extreme always package their ideology in something that sounds appealing, like "wanting to maximize human potential and opportunity for all".
So no, we're not going to accept your radical, crypto-communist ideology packaged as 'opportunity'. In fact, it's people like you who deny people opportunities because they are white or Asian.
@@dimitrioskantakouzinos8590 I’m afraid your facts might need a reality check.