European Alliance vs Russia: Europe divided
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 фев 2025
- It is 2017, or the very near future. Ukraine suddenly implodes in a civil armed struggle. Russia intervenes and de facto occupies it. EU delivers an ultimatum and border skirmishes lead everyone to an unthinkable armed clash. But EU is not united, and only certain countries go against Russia. Who'd win? What would happen to Ukraine and the Baltic states? Whose military would prevail?
Music by Matija Malatestinic
www.malatestini...
Vote for country pairs you'd like to see in future videos in the poll, over at our website:
www.binkov.com
You can also browse for a Binkov T-Shirt or other Binkov merch, via the store at our website, using the aforementioned link.
If you really like Binkov's videos, you can support him via Patreon.
www.patreon.co...
Subscribe to Binkov's channel for more videos!
www.youtube.co...
Follow Binkov's news on Facebook!
www.facebook.c...
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
Know who would really win in this war?
Switzerland
American Legionary haha how come you say that
tu nguyen because Switzerland is the most neutral country, it wouldn't even be touched. Therefore,they win without doing anything except staying out of the war and not helping either side.
Wrong answer. Its because Switzerland girls are the most attractive of all.
tu nguyen touché good sir
Most likely, they're not getting involved. As for offense, they are no match.
It this stage I'm not sure if Russia could defeat Luxembourg.
LOL or even Iceland when they have no military or even the Vatican City
@@hareshgill8994 everybody gangsta till Vatican City starts building a military
On a serious note ukraine would be split in half if Ukraine's didn't get so much aide
@@dantelove4606 they didn’t even get that much. We sent them 16 himars while we have hundreds and it was still enough to turn the fight around
@@Drearysidewalk hundreds of billions of dollars = not that much = 🤡
Perhaps russian power was SLIGHTLY overestimated?
It would've been more realistic if the Russians had remained in Ukraine, and hadn't gone any further than 200 km from the pre-war borders.
😂
slightly?
To be fair, they did fine in 2014 in Ukraine and basically they were gods in Syria. Nobody expected them to get stuck in Ukraine that badly, so is logical that someone 4 years though they were op.
“Starting morale the same! Russia has head start in preparation! Ukraine offers no organized resistance!”
Fucking Christ this shit is said out loud in the video
Even post Brexit, there's no way Britain would let the rest of Europe take on Russia, without them!
I know, the video talks about the EU like it's something.
Mmm not necessarily, Britain's goal for over 500 years is to not let Europe be dominated by one power.
We'd do what we always do, side with the weaker power to preserve the balance of power
@@hansgruber788 This is objectively untrue, we're a member of NATO and an exceptionally close French and German Ally, there is no well in hell the UK wouldn't be fighting for the EU. NATO is the fundamental cornerstone of British foreign policy.
@@mutualbear well then that'd mean the americans would fight to and then of course wed side with them. but this was taking into account a purely european war (so no nato) and all I'm saying is that if that were the case, wed not join fight
@@hansgruber788 Not really 500 years I'd say, Britain had no problem with the dominating Charles V (HRE emperor, king of Spain, archduke of Austria etc...). It's only in the second half of the 17th century when Britain was becoming a great power and was trying to cockblock Louis XIV's dominating France with alliances against him, that this little British game began imho.
The real winner in this scenario would be the American defense industry making a large payday from EU sales.
Yet many EU nations still use American made weapon systems or support systems. And like Binkov already mentioned; the EU industrial complex will take some time to get spun up to full military mobilization. They'll likely purchase American and even British (which in this scenario is not engaged) weapon systems as interim solutions or to fulfill niche capabilities that they're own industries are inadequate at while their own industries focus on what they're good at.... which again, will result in a large payday. Especially considering that even right now in relative peacetime the American defense industry is very lucrative in Europe.
so uh what US weapons would those be?
The US sold over $42 billion of weapons across the world (a record high since the end of the Cold War), of which $7.3 billion went to Europe. Among those include aircraft such as the F-35 (which is the bulk of sales) and F-16, small naval ships, missile defense systems (Patriot). I can't remember where I read it, but I think this also includes firearm optic sights, aircraft avionics systems, and mission systems. A couple countries include UK and Italy, which has well developed military industries as you all mentioned.
I'll mention too that even though the US easily exports the most weapons in the world, the US still had to import a lot of weapon systems or military support systems when the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq kicked off and US arms industries needed time to ramp up production. Even now, the US still purchases weapon systems from other countries. As Binkov mentioned, the European arms industries will also require time to meet wartime demands and the US is already well positioned to meet the interim needs (as is the UK which wasn't engaged in this video's scenario).
Is europe vs russia no nato vs russia...
BRICS vs NATO
They die in russian winter
Maldives Vs Global Warming
Dayuuuuuuuuum
Maldives vs China
Maldives 😂😂 is it county?
What a roast
Global warming wins
Who would win,
The European Union
Or
A giant snowy boi
switzerland
France nearly beat Russia but winter got them, Germany nearly got Moscow but winter got them as well but a joint invasion in the summer with all EU countries could end russia.
@@deutschesabend Overly simplified, winter played its part but it was far from the main factor to the defeat of the French+Germans
@@deutschesabend Poles got Moscow, but the shrinking resources of vodka got them and they went home.
@@deutschesabend Winter was for both sides, and you said that winter got Germans.
So, conclusion: Russians are machos, Germans are pussies...And by the way, it was not that cold:
journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/10.1175/1520-0477%281989%290702.0.CO%3B2
Now that Ukraine is kicking Russia's ass, do you care to reevaluate your assessment? 2-3 of the larger European militaries would have no problem crushing Russia as long as the fight remained conventional.
how was the america afghanistan war where america left running like a roadrunner and could not even win haha
But it will not remain conventional my friend.
@@Scapone2001 Cope harder. The US had a kill ratio of 3,000 to 600,000. They didn't run, they just realised the Afghan people don't want their help, so they let them to rot.
There is one problem...russia Doesnt have the economy to sustain the war. Historically much of europe would fight til the end (particularly germany). Plus EU wouldnt take an offensive role as it is complex for such a large amount of nations to work cohesively; theyd wear down the russians in a matter of months and force the russians to sue for peace
Nah Russian winter trumps all
Yes but look at Russia historically. When have they ever had the economy to sustain a war. If there's one thing you have to give the Russians, it's durablity
go tell that to a europe occupied nazi germany
Historically, what did the French, and British do when German invade Poland, Macedonia, Croatia, Belgium, Denmark, Norway, Netherlands...etc...?
Oh right, they withdraw their troops back to their countries to construct a hard-line of defense.
So why do you think they will throw the whole kitchen sink in to protect Latvia again?
Bidoof Didoof which idiot would go into northern Russia? Napoleon got hit by a very unlucky cold winter when he was retreating from Moscow, which isn't that far north.
You ended up overrating Russia's military quite a bit. Ukraine alone is being able to hold off Russia on it's own.
Russia wasnt using their total power, they wanted to not kill civilians
The war has been going on for a week, he gave Russia a month to occupy Ukraine, and this was 4 years ago when Ukraine had a smaller army
@@imperialjapaneseguy7799 you say that as they launch ballistic missiles into flats
@@marioirl1569 now they are using total force, and now they are conquering great cities
@@marioirl1569 Russia could turn all major cities into dust if they wanted to.
Monaco Vs Vatican City (2017)
Arena war
Crusade
Vatican City Vs Italy !?
To put it simply Vatican City because it’s the home for the most holiest man in the world for many religions
This video aged badly. 1 Armed Ukraine obliterated the shit Russia.
Good joke😂
@@papajohnspizzaria5575 Your mother is a good joke and you are a bad joke. Ukraine have more tanks since the invasion begin.
AUSTRALIA 2017 vs 200.000 BIG BIRDS THAT RUN
UltimatePotato Dude *NO!* Not another bloodbath!
Oh dear God.... *THE EMU'S ARE COMING! THE EMU'S ARE COMING!!!*
The comments are going to be great
Bob Jones I'm sure about that too.
Prophetic
I like how easily Russia conquer Ukraine in this hypothetical scenario.. reality prove to be quite different
Because the hypothetical assumes Ukraine descends into civil war and doesn’t resist Russian occupation, of course reality is different there’s no civil war
@@looinrims …or that Russia declares total war with Ukraine instead of a limited Special military operation to secure Eastern Europe and try to negotiate a deal with Ukraine and NATO
@@mrg8890 yeah exactly, it’s literally in the first like minute of the video, it’s not ‘conquered’ in this it’s occupied
it did not age that well
The toxicity in the comments
I love it.
The toxicity in the ciityyyy in the ciiity...
It's fun to watch idiots fight it out, but it's also a bit depressing.
Good video, and within the parameters you set out, seems accurate enough. Only problem would be that the parameters are very unrealistic. For one, I cannot imagine many EU members remaining neutral, even the those who dislike the EU. None want Russia to advance westwards, Britain (who much prefers continental Europe to Russia historically) certainly wouldnt. That alone adds a lot of firepower to the EU alliance.
For another, if Europe went about this smart it would simply dig in, bomb from behind a defensible line and use its vast economy to cripple Russia and indeed play the waiting game.
Within your parameters and for the short term, Russia holds an edge. Realistically, it stands no chance at all. And thats not even mentioning that the USA (NATO ally), China (a huge trading partner with the EU) and Japan (an economic powerhouse in its own right) would intervene on the EU's side as well.
Russia has no chance in hell. None.
I agree Europe would economically punish and England has a huge extremely well trained military. Also Poland is about to double the size of their military
This comment aged really well
@@bryanminghan thanks Bryan, it's funny if you look into this stuff propaganda pushers from Russia will pounce on you. Like the "Russia insight" channel...say any joke or negative fact about Putin they go nuts
@@bryanminghan Yeah this couldn't have been more wrong on multiple levels.
@@kylewaldron1882 actually it was to pessimistic, Russia fared even worse then the best expectations
You are just forgetting one point. Russian economy could effort such a large war for no more than 15 days.
Field Marshall Keitel made a somehow similar presumtion in the early 1940..he gave the soviets 3 months!.. we all know how that one ended..
@@perastotigautera1426 He dont include the massive US Support on Warmaterial for Russia!
@@MrHeidiHigh he was overconfident,arrogant,incapable of thought improvisation(eastern european feature)and not thinking outside the box...it dooms the germans everytime in their endevours...it s the western european arrogance and overconfidence that brings them allways to their doom..
@@perastotigautera1426 Rudel sayd: "When we shot down 30 Tanks, another 30 Tanks comming from anywhere of the Taiga. We bring the soviets massive looses on humans and Warmaterial, but they always incomming with new !"
@@MrHeidiHigh to be fair most of the tanks were not coming from america or the allies the large majoirity was coming from the ussr itself no america but the allies did help but not as much
Who's watching it in 2022, mostly for the laughs?
I wake up to a binkovs battleground.its gunna be a helluva day
Michael Brown Why boycott Pepsi when you can boycott Israel?
Moussa Saab it's a joke
rob 998 dude,it was a goddamn joke
rob 998 eh,fuck off
This is probably the same conclusion Putin and the GRU came to before they invaded Ukraine. He underestimated the ability of the Ukraine military, the collective resolve of NATO, and the U.S. Russia also overestimated the operational capabilities of its own military.
He so far never had more than 300k men at a time deployed in Ukraine and plus there’s no way Ukraine could do much without substantial NATO help
War would have already been lost for Ukraine if he had sent 800k men at least
That being said, the war in Ukraine isn’t over
For Russia, it’s an existential war. The EU only managed to punish themselves by sanctioning Russian 😅
Back in the old days when we all thought Russia was the "second military superpower"
They're more like the 3rd these days because of China. They are holding out really well against the US these days though
never did. I always knew it was overrated, but they surprised even me.
@@Cofeeman911well the US is considered first military superpower and still managed to lose against Taliban forces 😅
seen from that point of view Afghanistan is new #1 military power
@@randomgreekmathematician3159 No one cares about your usa, we are not talking about your beloved usa. And everything you said is retarded af.
@@randomgreekmathematician3159usa left it didint lose
It's funny to look at old videos and see how much Russia has been overestimated.
If Russia can't even beat Ukraine, they would not stand a chance against the entire EU.
Have to be that guy, Russia just came out of a recession and their GDP is tanked. They can barely afford to feed a battle-group let alone a full invasion force, just look at the Georgian War. You also assume that Europe wouldn't appoint a supreme commander of EU forces similar to WW2, once that occurs most of the EU's logistic problems should be wiped away under one command, excluding language barriers.
Ancient Hoplite So what about communication between soldiers? I really would like to hear conversation between polish and german one. And dont mention Georgia, it was 10 years ago, Russian forces are much more proffesional and well equipped than in 2008 when military reforms only started. Look at Ukraine or Syria, that's what matters now.
H B What I'm supposed to look for in Ukraine or Syria?
I give on the language issue, that will be a problem. The whole reason WW2 was won was because you had a bunch of Englishmen fighting on the Western Front. However Georgia is still completely relevant, Russia may have begun Military reforms but with their GDP how it is, they can barely afford to train the troops with the new tech built. Syria is a completely different story, Russia has mostly been using their Navy and Air force to attack the Islamic State, and looking at the context it isn't the same as facing professional troops in Europe with billions of euros reinforcing their back.
Ancient Hoplite Russia is also using a lot of old munitions in Syria. They essentially test cruise missiles occasionally, but the vast majority of bombs dropped are old "dumb" bomb. I also recall reading that Russia has a very small stockpile of contemporary air to air missiles, while most are several decades old. The EU could just flat out buy new equipment from other countries instead of increasing domestic production.
Ancient Hoplite I don't know where you're getting your info from, but Russia's agriculture industry is booming, they can most likely feed their current forces, and if they secure Serbia and the South Slavs, then that's even more food for Russia. Europe would absolutely get TANKED if Russia simply turned off its oil and gas pipes and that's the reality we live in that most EU OLIGARCHS fail to acknowledge. The Eu would suffer major casualties from the direct result of having no fuel or hydro before it comes up with a solution, and there would be MORE political unrest in the EU than in Russia which has a central figure for a government that everyday will stand behind. I think you are very wrong.
Realistically, the Nordic countries would join the fight against the Russians, especially Finland. Also, the US has stationed plenty of troops in the Baltic States, to make sure that if the Russians invade, they will have to fight the US military. This would inevitably drag the US into the conflict. Same goes for Britain, and Turkey might find an opportunity to weaken the Russian power in Syria and the Caucasus. A conflict like this would start a third world war. With the US busy, China might seize the chance to invade Taiwan and possibly Japan, whilst the South China Sea conflict could go hot. Same goes for the Persian Gulf states and Yemen, with the Saudi-Iranian dispute turning into a full-scale war.
Pumpa Paj issa scenario
It's pretty incredible, if not scary, how the action of a single nation can spiral the entire world into a world war.
Русс град remember 1939? This time finland has 900k soldiers too.
Русс град we destroyed your tanks with woden logs imagine what we could do with actual tanks
Русс град not much to brag about on your side
Funny how he does not speak about how RUSSIAS ECONOMY WOULD TAKE A SHIT IN THE FIRST 30 DAYS AFTER THE WAR STARTS.
Russian chine iran nuke win vs nato =russian win
I read a post in Washington that Russians no longer receive high-tech electronics and everything else. Because of this, their economy is internal
When I need a good laugh, I come to this video : I love watching science fiction !
I really love the part where russia is able to disrupt european logistics while maintaining their own for over 5km lol
The biggest Russian troops nightmare is tractor and farmers. LOL
Lmao yeah imagine if Russians could cross 200km with intact logistics…like they did when they encircled Mariupol from the west…
Oh…oh wait…
@@looinrims To Mariupol from ruski Taganrog that's 100km, being able to read a map would have prevented your public embarrassment.
Now tell me how putinists were supposed to fight Poland and Czechia alone when they couldn't even dream of reaching Odesa ? LMAO
Now remember, the biggest city captured in this war for now was... Rostov from putin by Wagner... Total humiliation.
@@holthrain3985 wrong, if you drop a pin at the Crimea Ukraine 2022 border and do directions on gps to Mariupol it’s 221mi on the fastest roadway
Maybe if you opened a map you wouldn’t make an ass out of yourself so easily
Or if you read ‘from the west’, so either you’re illiterate or a moron, take your pick
Don't let Putin watch this
Oh no...
😂
Lol
* (Putin sees it)
-(shrug) So what?
Again Binkov has serious evaluation problem on Russian weapons. Binkov rated Su27SM, su30m2 as mediocre while mig31m as poor fighters? These fighters could actually challenge the Rafale and ef2000 in air engagement. In air to ground sorties, su30m2 are actually good weapons platform.
For attack helicopters, the ka52 and mi28 would easily mow down the tiger choppers and EU tank battalion that only AH64 could challenge.
Looking at French forces performance in Bosnia, the French weapons fared pretty badly against the older russian weapons in Serbian forces inventory. Without American forces, the EU is weak and no match against Russia
Did the French even deploy modern weapons in Bosnia? Most of their modernisation programmes stem from the mid 90s and mid 2000s.
Lytinwheedle yes, 2x mirage 2000s that were shot down. 1x by zsu23-4 while the other by manpads. Russian weapons proven effective. I doubt the Rafale and ef2000 would work well in combat compared to US f15c
Jay Son Wong
Mirage 2000 variants are rated as Capable or Mediocre by Binkov.
Rafale is an entirely different jet, more recent and well equipped.
What was your argument again ? that Rafale shouldn't be rated Excellent
in comparison to other Russian planes, for which you have given no
statistics ?
MaddeningFly the russians have upgraded their su27sm and su27m to su27sm2/3 that are supposed to be capable, not mediocre. Be it in BVR or dogfight, the Su27sm3 are superior than mirage2000, not on same level
The thing is though, Russia's economy would quickly be in the shitter and they would be diplomatically isolated.
They already are. and their trade with non western countries won't be affected at all, since no one else aside from nato and maybe SK and Japan cares what they are doing. India and China will continue trade. and they can block any UN sanction since they are a permanent member of the security council. it'll just be sanctions from the west, and they already are in sanctions from the west lol
Arn't they already being sanctioned by them? The Russian economy is still rising faster than that of the U.S.
Fraz Russian economy hasn't been the best for decades and has been constantly diplomatically isolated yet Russia is not facing a Cultural imbalance and out right civil war as the USA is currently facing, Russia is not lacking in resources like RARE EARTH as the USA is lacking trying to justify a war with North Korea. Russia has a strong leader and political hierarchy which people respect, and there is over all more social balance in Russia which is mind you a multi-cultural country let alone the Multi-cultural mess of America and melting pot of forced immigration and cheap labor to EU states.
Most of EU would need to find new sources of oil and gas. Is it one year what EU has in spare. Thought Russia get most of it money froms sales of oil and gas. Economy could crash faster.
Sabazius I didn't know the US was facing out-right civil war... TheUS has it's issues but it isn't in a civil war. By the way Russia can enjoy its "strong leader" and his oligarch friends
Я думаю, что Беларусь бы всё-же вступила в войну на стороне России.
Ну вообще Беларусь почти как и Швейцария соблюдает нейтралитет
@@типЁж Беларусь входит в альянс в котором Россия - глава.
Но то что ты сказал не чего не значет
@@типЁж благодарю, что цените моё мнение.
Тут даже население влияет
У тебя там рядом близкие гибнут,а ты сохраняешь нейтралитет)не будет такого,население 100% поддержит е
Russia VS 29 countries? Hmmm...
Michał Hunicz pretty sure russia would lose just because of how shitty their economy is. It could not withstand trade embargo from the west.
pikkuhakki2 Keep watching CNN.
why 29? 2/3 of those country would never go to war against Russia
Painxx1 I know, I am only joking.
pikkuhakki2 russian economy is almost equell to german. Is German economy shitty?
I don’t believe the UK being outside of the EU will mean we will not help in this war. We’re still part of NATO and the UN
Kyle Fear by that time your queen would've died and the nation would have lost billions of £££ just to organise the funeral. The following national holidays would mean the country would not produce any money for at least 3 days.
Now that's a royal pain in the ass
Kevin Are you sure XD
Kevin it might cost millions but not billions
Kevin the last royal wedding cost £34 million. So I very much doubt that a funeral would exceed into the billions
Kevin The monarchy is a big part of what it means to be British. So me and many others don’t care how much it costs
1:50 Bulgaria is in Romania and Romania is in Bulgaria
Good observation!
He mixed up Bulgaria with Romania, yes.
@@saguntum-iberian-greekkons7014 Russia would own them all. That's what I like about this video.
wow
this aged like milk for russia
Watch more of Binkovs videos about Russia before the Ukraine war. He had them beating everyone. Talking about them like a capable military.
So, so bias. and now clearly just ridiculous to ever think Russia could compete in modern warfare with europe
@@jameswalshmma yea russia wouldn’t stand a chance against a modern well trained and technologically more advanced fighting force
Amazing how you kids seem to think fighting your own country with your equipment doctrine and knowledge in a defencive position like ukraine is something that ever ends quickly? or how the fact that both nations use operational depth and time as thier doctrine. the war was never going to end sooner than 3 years. nevermind outside support to ukraine. Also keep in mind how little of russian forces are actually in ukraine and how few actual advanced equipment they are sending. almost nothing of thier best is there. all of ukraine is there. including thier mercenary isis mujahadeen taliban and neo nazi members that have been killing civilians for 13 years. seems everyone also forgets 2 years ago ukraine was one of the most shady countries in europe.
@@jameswalshmma They can. What’s happening in Ukraine is called a special military operation by the Kremlin for a reason. Russia could’ve easily just bombard the heck out of Ukraine just like the United States did with Iraq in 2003. But this situation is very different. Just look at the 2023 summer Ukrainian counter offensive and look at how many modern leopard western tanks, armour vehicles Maxpros were destroyed by mercenaries 😂
Colombia vs Venezuela
Algeria vs Morocco
Azerbaijan vs Armenia
Poland vs Ukraine
El Salvador vs Honduras
SLAVE 702 Albania vs Serbia featuring Kosovo
>Poland vs Ukraine
Ez. Winner is Russia
El Salvador already beat honduras. They beat them in 3 days. Honduras can beat el Salvador in soccer ⚽️ though. But thats about it.
"Russians capture the territory of Ukraine
"
Ukrainian rebel army:
- hold my beer
Artem Dekhtiarenko * rebel shot in head by Russian soldier while beer still in hand.
@@dejanstankovic4598 rebel shots russian in head by drinkin beer and watching how other russpigs are burning after big BOOM ID.
@@Mataluga Ukrainian army are so dumb,they are killing themselves with getting attacked by their own Mil Mi 24 Hind,that was a funny Clip,tho
@@sovietheart3883 idiot its you Mi 24 didnt killed friendly. But i love the Way US fucked up terorussia by multiply idiots whos is carrgo 200. And the fniest part Fucked up jet and militia anhed russpigs. Oh yea and the most great part Arty from beloved Ukrain making russpig go home by parts oh NIIICE. But you know Chechs and other living in this shithole called Russ they killing with knife this fucking dirt. p/s Go fuckyourself.
@@sovietheart3883 Oh yea the best part own government dont give a fuck and this russhit will fucking die and China will just take lands and fuck this gopnik shitland.
yeah, I too played as russia in the millennium day mod
Retro Stein It is op isnt it?
op? if you unite europe in that mod you wreck russia in a few weeks.
You don't even need to unite Europe in order to wreck Russia. As long as it's in the hands of the incompetent AI then it's easy.
Ah, I see you are a man of culture as well.
bet you feel like a big man drawing arrows and clicking play
An updated video would be useful now
Great material fella. keep it up
I hate to say it but I agree with the result of this scenario. We in Europe have been developing our counties for the past 70 years with the single goal of expanding living standards, infrastructure, economy, etc. A major benefit of the EU and NATO as a whole is that we don't need to worry about our military development so much, all we realistically need is enough to hold back an enemy until the US arrives. This allows us to focus more on developing our counties while outsourcing defense to the single largest military in the world - take that away and we wouldn't stand much of a chance against a country that has been ignoring living standards/economy/political stability/infrastructure in favour of a human wave of soldiers for the past 90 years.
Yeah no get your head out of your arse, your last sentence shows how fucking stupid you are. Russia is more prosperous now than it has ever been in the history of mankind so fuck right off.
Yet, on paper, combined European militaries are equal or larger than Russian.
Yeah on paper communism is the perfect system. The problem lies with the logistics of all those independent countries organizing those troops between ourselves, supplying them, chain of command etc. But Just looking at numbers then yeah, our armies are bigger and far more technologically advanced
Last sentense sounds like you are really deluded. Soviet Union did not sacrifice peoples wealth in favor of military - life quality was improving constantly since 30s (and break during WW2). Neither does modern Russia. The problem is - its hard to have independent politics if you dont have good army. Large threat like NATO makes to have large military.
If European Union relies so heavily on U.S Military support, why do so many Europeans talk massive shit about it?
Two problems:
A) Yes, some Europeans don't support wars. That doesn't mean countries wouldn't join the fight. It simply means it would be unpopular war, but govs rarely follow public opinions when it comes to survival.
B) You're overstating air defense capabilities and importance and underplaying the sheer dominance of EU in the air. EU would certainly hold the air superiority and rained the anti-ration missile down on the russian radars. Tactics that worked so many time in the past. Once you hold the air you will win.
A) Most of them are pussies.
B) *Anti-Radiation missile unless there is an anti ration missile to counter infantry supplies.😁😁😅
Umm... Vietnam?
One question . When did NATO bomb a country with a normal army with a normal air force and air defense?
Thank you
@@rerbitd7094 true , so true . Nato only harasses weak countrys
Your best video so far! Congrats
*your
Russia Victory... How funny
Russia vs Turkey - Marginal Victory
Russia vs EU - Victory
Wut..?
๖Rainforce It's because of geography. Turkey is more mountainous in the North, while the EU border with Russia is located on the North European Plain, which is perfect for a tank offensive. If the rest of NATO were to join the fight, Russia wouldn't be able to have that same advantage. US and UK air power added, Russia would stand few chances to face NATO in the air. If Turkey were to join too, it would be able to sink the Russian Black Sea Fleet.
Geography and placement of troops play a very big part in these scenarios
terrain has a huge effect in war, Russia has alot of tanks but they are made primarily for the large open steppes of Russia, not the hilly and mountainous area of turkey. its not so much they would loose they couldn't get any sizable advantage
Got it, thank you all very much.
@@tudormardare66 UK air power? u must be joking?
This was basically France and Germany against Russia.
* Tintin likes this
*France and Poland
MinSeop Leem I don't think Poland would really go to war with Russia in all honesty, I think there would be a mutual agreement regarding Ukraine since Western Ukrainians are basically Poles.
@Gel Mir you are stupid, we have telephones/internet now. It would take 15min for france to surrender.
@Sabazius true, split ukraine. It would benefit both russia, poland and ukraine.
A lot of people here over-estimating the power of the EU army. Furthermore I don't think people get the meaning of 'Russian Victory'. That doesn't mean a red alert 3 scenario where all of Europe is occupied by Russia. It does mean that Europe came off worst in this scenario. They suffer similar casualty rates but Russia's political structure makes this less damaging to national unity. Furthermore Russia managed to gain territory and keep it. Making this a minor victory on their part.
generalpeeps Russia wouldnt occupy whole Europe, why would they want Germans for example on their borders, they would maybe try to restore USSR borders or expand them by consuming slavic countries like Poland, Czech republic and Slovakia.
Yeah, i think the problem lies in the end outcome being stated as a clear victory, when it clearly isn't. Yes, Russia gains some ground, then loses some and ends with more then what they started with. So... a political victory? Alas, the Ukraine seams to be the only clear losing side here :'(
Gaining control over Ukraine and Baltics would be a trememndous win for Russia. Getting to secure Transnistria is a perfect bonus
They would practically restore its USSR day European borders, that would give them real advantage in the future.
Well, this aged poorly.
I think EU will react long before Russia has invaded whole Ukraine. I think is very unlikely that Russia will ever be able to take the whole Ukraine so quickly that EU wouldn't have time to react..
they can. The scenario assumes that Russia gets involved after a large civil conflict, much bigger than the one in 2014. After full Russian intervention, many of the Ukrainian officers would back down and the remaining would have just poor equipment at their use. They cannot even use the ones they currently have because NATO ammo provided to them sucks.
@@nottoday3817 It must be borne in mind that the opponent cannot afford to be underestimated. Even a small overestimation is better. But hopefully the appropriate realism will remain in that overestimation in the future.
Makes no sense that the UK would not join, regardless of leaving the EU. I can see why the rest of NATO like the US is not involed, that would just tip the scales too much. But the UK is a commited and integrel part in Europeian defence, It's navy and airforce alone is worth so much.
Royal Are you British
Royal just when I though British were getting smarter
HITESH Adhikari Yeah, that's a shame.
A European theater of war that doesn't involve Belarus? Seriously dude?
2 edgy 4 me he said that he would make an other video wher Bellarus is included. He just wanted to show russia's strenght on its one
As the reality shows, place russian forces at the west frontier of Ukraine at the beginning is a bit optimistic for Russia ;)... So this is total bullshit.
Finland has 1 million reserves. Isn't it practical they should be neutral ?
almost 100% of their gas came from Russia though.
@@gelmir7322 Indeed, a large gathering of supplies and security of the sea are pre-requisites for Finlands involvement in anything than direct agression towards Finland.
Wtf is this video, u cant just cherrypick some nations and leave the rest out. Also Russia would not have all of its troops in the European theatre. Eu could also stop all maritime trade from western russia, this would hinder russias economy. Lastly you are vastly underestimating the effects of eu air superioty and tech advantage.
karva Many European member states sympathize more with Russia than other EU states, Eastern and Southern Europe has notable cases of this. Besides he picked out the ones indecisive or against an EU army.
Thats why Russia has created stronger ties with the east, since the middle east and China has created a strong cooperation. Russia has learned the importance of economic stance which im pretty sure the economic cooperation of BRICS is designed to survive the sanctions.
The Next video will have all of Europe united against Russia.
Totally agree, it does seem to be a heavily biased video, probably Binkov's worst one yet. I don't think either side should have a "clear victory" or "unstoppable" label pinned to them in this scenario.
Oh yes and the spetnazks also have teleportation and will kill your unborn children
You haven't talked about logistics. It is fairly known that russia struggles to feed its conscripts even in peacetime even in their territory. I think that should be considered. In your scenario russian forces move instantly in the baltic states and EU forces take a month to get in, how is that possible ?
He did talk about logistics, it's in Russia's favor because the frontline is much closer to Russia's concentration of forces. Of course, in a long, drawn-out war, Russia wouldn't be able to hold on to the occupied territory for long. As history shown, after Russia expanded to a certain size, it always broke apart, and the cycle repeated again. Russia's population and economy is too small for its size, maintaining a vast territory is difficult.
Paul Fournet also, he didn't take count of the fact that Ukrainians and people from the baltic both hate their historical oppressor, so there would be resistance. The Anti air in Kiev would likely be destroyed by nationalists when they realize they will be occupied.
Paul Soroka Most Ukrainian people are actually in favor of Russia to their UkroNazi run government.
@@moussasaab1456 you are moron.
In the past russian units didn’t even drive their vehicles to train once received, during war this changed instantly as everyone realized it was stupid
And besides such idiocy does not occur anymore in major or even minor militaries, unless you’re Argentina, because poor
The EU has a much larger economy and I’d say that is what counts for the most here. If Russia can’t advance fast enough, the sheer production capacity of Europe would eventually break Russia, though we would run out of Natural Gas. But then again, is that really so important?
ruclips.net/video/co2CiqRxuuQ/видео.html
your factory will be in ruins strategic bombardment by non-nuclear missiles will do their job
@@НациональностьНарк no
Yeah, it is. If in winter Poland and Germany would freeze
In a war against Russia realistically countries like Germany the Netherlands Belgium and possibly even France would basically be useless once the war really gets going because there society has become against masculinity against beings aggressive and against hard work and so unless Western Europe could change in less then a year the entire war would really just be about is Poland and some other eastern countries by the time it would take for Western Europe to really get more men out in the field Russia would’ve already went into full war time economy production and would be outproducing the eu any advantage the eu specifically Western Europe holds really just doesn’t mean much when they can barley do anything with it
I really like how you end every video with a quick comment about peace.
Peace and Love is very important.
Next do the full Eu
I disagree with how you selected which countries would participate in the coalition. Firstly, the EU has the exact same legal obligations when one of its member states is attacked as NATO does (an attack on one is an attack on all). Russian activity in the Baltic states would immediately pull every single EU member state into the war. Secondly, what the population of those countries think of a single EU army has absolutely nothing to do with the decision to aid the EU in a war against Russia. Most countries are against a unified EU army, even some that you've included in the coalition.
Realistically, in case of a war of such importance, all member states would want to be certain of victory. If the war takes a bad turn for the EU coalition, this would mean even those that weren't directly involved would economically be hit hard, because an attack on any member (especially more prominent members like Germany and France) is an attack on the single market they are also part of and will directly affect their economy. This war should be supported by (almost) every member state, plus probably the UK (in or out, the UK has already stated it will continue the defence and intelligence cooperation with other EU member states). Only members with exceptional reasons to not participate (for example, Finland to prevent a war on their soil and keep a buffer zone between Russia and Sweden) should be left out of the coalition.
In the time, when European Concil will decide about EU war with Russia, Russians soldiers will march in champs de lise
Yeah, do you remember 1938?
And that is even the worst case - something like the Munich Agreement..
Somehow those who believe in European military alliance will save them, always forgot that the Nazi took Poland, Czech, Greece, Nether land, Macedonia, Norway, Sweden, etc... before British and French troops even fire the 1st shot.
And the moment France was in real threat of total collapse, the British all tactical retreat through Dunkirk.
The British had about 13 divisions to help defend France/Belgium (the British Expeditionary Force). France had over 100 divisions (by comparison, at that time the entire American army was 400k men, the total allied force involved in the battle of France was 3.3 million men). France failed but was supposed to hold out, it was expected to be like WW1. Britain relied on France in the early days and didn't go all out in a continental war yet by 1940. When the Germans attacked, they only had a pretty small force there to help France keep back the main attack. France had 104 divisions defending her, the British sent 13 divisions (the BEF), the Dutch had 10 divisions, the Belgians 22 divisions, the Polish 2 divisions. 1940 was France's war, NOT a British war. When France fell, you couldn't realistically expect the countries that were only there to support them to take their place.
Besides, we're living in 2017/18, not the 1940's. What the Germans did in the early 1940's is exceptional. They revolutionised warfare back then when the other countries were still thinking about trench warfare. What they did was miraculous. They ran rings around the allies because they were strategically completely out of their league. Do you really think Russia is just as strategically superior to the EU as Nazi Germany was against the Allies? No. Not by far.
This video is rubbish - it assumes that NATO members can be invaded by Russia without a complete 100% NATO response. Which would absolutely be the case. Even the Turks would make a symbolic effort to respect clause 5.
Spain neutral? good joke xD
Los españoles odian a Rusia? 🥺😰
@@OmarMahmoudov si
SpAin is unstable
I don't think Spain would decisively send any forces in.
@@OmarMahmoudov Don't worry I don't think they would. Peace and love !
I believe there are currently british and dutch troops stationed in the baltic states, thus the baltic states being invaded would draw in the UK I believe...
Vayle well yeah, but he didn't want to involve them for whatever reason 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Wonder why... :)
With the UK Russia would have little chance. And there's also very little reason not to include countries like Spain. I hope he makes the full EU video soon because here it's almost like he cherry picked EU countries that would together barely match the Russian military
This scenario is only the EU. In case of war irl it would be NATO
not just NATO, probably other American allies as well like Japan
Mistake at 1:48 The places of Romania and Bulgaria are messed up...
good eye
Its funny how I'm watching this while Russia is starting to send troops into Ukraine at the moment. 😶
So. Did it go as expected? Did the Russians conquer all of Ukraine without a single casualty?
I would disagree. in a prolonged conflict, the edge would fall to Europe with far more production capacity.
I think he mentioned that in a long-term, EU will eventually win through attrition. It's just that for this scenario, the EU is incomplete and the scenario is 2 years max.
Perhaps, but I think that "long term" is far less than two years. France and Germany are already massive arms manufacturers. I don't think it would be insane to believe that they could easily (within a year +- a few months) convert their factories to treat with thicker steel and build tanks instead of cars. Not to mention the absolutely massive financial edge Western countries have, they could almost buy all their equipment from other countries from other arms manufactorers like the USA or China.
I don't think they would be able to use their population in any way besides logistics due to a year-long Russian training program for its citizens, but more people means more production. I don't think the EU could be very aggressive at the beginning, but after a year, once they build more planes, more tanks and all that, that they would slowly get an edge over Russia in pure economic output which would then leak over to other areas such as the military, missile systems and more. The technological edge would also be exacerbated by time.
Dont forget that russia buys wont be able to sell oil to the europ countries like all ways so there economi would collapse
Many of the supply chains for EU equipment no longer exists or is multi-national.
If the EU wanted to order in more F35s, it would require the US to give over some of the production slated for its own air force to the EU and it is reliant on capacity from for components from places like the UK. This significantly complicates the ramp up.
For things like the Leclerc and Ariete, production runs are over. They arnt making even export variants any more. Even the Leopard is being produced at a low level capacity as an export. Virtually no support platform production lines exist and most of the EU procures its support vehicles from the US, meaning any losses cannot be easily replaced, and while the likes of Germany and France could, given time, convert to some serious war time production. Many smaller EU nations are simply not equipped to do the same. While Russia is configured to produce for and defend a state the size of Russia, France and Germany are only configured to produce for France and Germany, not a nation of 350 million people and a consummate geographic size and conflict zone.
Additionally, given the complexity of modern equipment factories cant just be given moulds and told to get on with it. Many would need completely re-configuring and quite possibly new equipment. Many of the vehicles are made from or armoured with composite materials that itself is not easy to make. The EU may have tank chassis ready to go but no armour to give them. To step up fighter production, you need a sudden influx of carbon fibre and radar absorbent materials. These are not trivial to produce.
I think for the EU to truly organise and mobilise, particularly without preexisting military alliances to lean on (eg. French-Anglo Alliance and Nordic Battlegroup) which are already militarily integrated and essentially "ready to ago" as a single entity, I think "at least" a few years ramp up is the minimum expectable capacity.
If we include the likes of the UK and the Nordics, I find it more plausible. Significantly more QRF and deployable forces with already exsisting plans and structures which other EU assets can simply be bolted too suddenly become available and home grown industries such a BAE, Rolls Royce and Saab, which make up substantial components of the EU industrial complex are now within the conflict sphere. Significant Naval assets and production of the UK, when augmented by France and the rest of the EU would also suddenly make the naval theatre viable where the EU holds an absolutely un-contestable edge over Russia would also play a roll I think.
Perhaps, you are correct. But Europe has several times the economy of Russia, French and German factories should be able to confidently produce for themselves. But France itself is the second military power on mainland Europe behind Russia. I would think that it would at the very least be a draw until one side can gain an advantage. And that advantage would more than likely fall to Europe.
It may be less than Russia, but with the massive influx of jobs, not to mention the efficiency of some countries like Germany with regards to construction capacity, the nertherland's naval trade network and Eastern European labour, not to mention France's already considerable experience in warfare and training. I feel that if the capacity of each country is utilized, Europe can overcome Russia in not much time in this war
I don't want Binkov T-shirt, i want Binkov puppet :'( ;)
Sealand vs the rest of the world (2018)
20 bucks Sealand will win with it seamen.
Recent events seem to show this to be wrong
Yes, the eu "federation" would colapse
why is the UK not modelled in this? the british army has soldiers on the russian border...that would massively swing things for europe
Ye, while we are against an EU army (I’m a military man, I hate the idea to) we would get involved...we have already posted troops on the border...and we are helping train the Ukrainian army in urban combat...
Branden Walmsley no it would not. Sorry man but your military isn’t even close to what you think about it
Axel Szmidt it’s not exactly bad and it would make a difference it’s not as good as the USA or Russia but it’s still decent
Don't get me wrong I'm not saying your weak but at this scale of conflict the difference between having you or not is sth about 4%-12% more quality troops in the optimistic scenario. The sad thing is that the up tu date doctrine of NATO is that we "try to help the eastern EU" but if that fails we make a nuke graveyard out of it. Its mainly because of logistics, there is only a certain distance you can move your troops at a given time and I'm pretty sure your gov knows about it, thus when having enough knowledge we can safely assume that the British won't rush to the front lines. Should you be willing to find out more look here:
www.globalfirepower.com/index.asp
And I also recommend getting to know how certain units work for that a recommend this game (preferably wait for sales):
www.wargame-rd.com/
Mathias Bergøy I was in it, I know what we do...we do more than most think...
Amy Schumer vs a ham sandwich
Mike G society loses that one
@@Ghidorah_Stan64 👍
Closed all apps when see you uploaded!
Reality is vastly different.
All estimates ignore logistic realities, human factors like internal corruption and morale as well as advances in weaponry and tactics.
I am very dissapointed... How could you misplace Romania and Bulgaria. You put Bulgaria in the place of Romania, and Romania in Bulagaria's place. A channel like this should NOT make this HUGE mistakes.
Tibi Tiberiu the map is not faulty, you are
CandyWithSomeDeliciousPoop I am from Romania,and the map shown at the beginning is wrong
Tibi Tiberiu Yup just noticed that too,hopefully he doesn't do the same mistake in his next video.
Tibi Tiberiu When did he do that?
Typowy Seba 1:48
You're right, but the EU should get help from Ukraine and Amerika. So in real life they should win.
Israeli vs Lebanon
There is no way Britain wouldn't get involved in that. Or Spain
It would, because NATO.
That's what I said
Not even NATO, because of the EU alone. The EU has the same "attack on one is an attack on all" articles, so the baltic war would immediately draw everyone into war. Besides that... the EU literally has practiced working together if exactly that would happen. There is a standard procedure in place on what to do in case of a Russian invasion and it of course involves almost every member state. Hell, many EU countries are already present in the Baltic states, including the UK, which for some strange reason is not involved at all in this scenario. I don't think Binkov has a full understanding of how the EU works. It's not as divided as it sometimes seems. That some countries don't want to take in refugees doesn't mean that in case of a huge war with Russian they won't help either. If push comes to shove, all member states would obviously help. Even when the UK is out, they've already made clear they're still part of the common defence policy so even the UK would still help
U.K. would 100% nuke Russia if it had to
The British Army is already part of a NATO forces in the Baltic states and is training Ukraine forces already
Serbia will always support Russia brothers!!!
no
@@tedm9926 yes!)))
@@Fat_Fly you will support us like in 1999? No, thanks.
better not
@@tedm9926say thanks to Yeltsin he betrayed you not russian people, Yeltsin betrayed many soviet allies
The choice of EU participants seems a bit arbitrary to me. I would also question whether an accidental war (I think that's what you described?) could last very long before a peace agreement was reached.
David Moore Well he did say it was highly speculative
Well actually it'd be way more in favour of Russia anyway. The coalition would form slower and initially it'd only be the states being invaded defending until their allies come and help. If the war ended up being like a WWIII then Britain would probably get involved and the tables might turn.
Here would be my coalition: France, Germany, Netherlands, Italy, Belgium, Spain, Poland, Czechia, Slovakia, The Baltic States, Croatia, Slovenia, Denmark and Norway with UK Air and Naval forces.
@@ub3rfr3nzy94. If a Baltic state was invaded, 100% of NATO would be there in a heartbeat. And many other countries would help, at least with logistic support and economic sanctions. The Russian Army would have to retreat and lick its wounds, while Putin bitterly threatens with MAD. The only game he can still play.
The anti muslim rhetoric is thick in these comments tonight. Can't we all just get along and pretend what a inclusive world world would be like.. we got hand puppets and everything.
Zach Russia and the muslims are too agresive to get along with.
What’s so funny about peace, love and understanding?
All i'm asking is that we come together as a race and kill each other over important things like artificial borders, salt, sitting on scared golden stools that are for looking and not touching, or pigs getting into peoples gardens and eating all their potatoes. Followed by a miscommunication in compensation for said potatoes. You know important stuff.
I almost came when I saw russia was banned from olympics
Binkov should rename his channel: “why counting tanks is not a good way to assess a country’s military capability”.
France would probably anihiliate Russia by itself.
Ukraine has shown that this analysis is obsolete through the use of drones
You should check the 2021 ammo stockpiles, the 2022 casualty levels, and European army strength, and come back to me
Russians would’ve crushed an American-less Europe as proven
Russia is easy to defeat, just drive into Moscow!
Кэтишкэт - ISorrow
Bro , i am not from Russia , , my country is from nato , and he is saying the truth , but this is just a video analist of power , in battlefield things are different, but i don't understand why ppl think russia is the agressor everytime , when usa have multiple bases surronding russian territory , and media teach us to be afraid of russia , they use russian past , so can gain public opinion , and sell weapows to border countries of russia , business my friend
To be fair, Russia do have an expansionist agenda that shaped Russia's geopolitics for centuries, which is finding a permanent warm water port (its geography isn't good for economy). But yeah, like you say, selling weapons is a business.
to be fair, russia shot down the mh17, killing around 300 dutch citizens.
EU would probably win, they would also get support from the US And canada
Jaime Henneman Don't forget that Russia has an alliance with China.
And China relies on multiple european trading partners (especially Germany) and the US. Why should they fight for the russians? An alliance? Yeah, an economic recession and a world war, because of Russia - that sounds reasonable. Because it's not like they had any problems in the past or anything...
@@RoyD_S rusia has no alliance. They are stupid
Zotax Majority of European prefer Russia at USA, many people would prefer fight against yankees than against Russia.
Crazy Klown wanna try 1 vs 1 you BurgerKing ? 😂😂
I'm guessing this video will get a few more views this week...
Binkov 3yrs ago: This scenario is highly speculative.
Me now: *looks at Russia massing personnel and equipment on the Ukrainian border* ...um...
Russia: priviet
how come?
There is no way that NATO would not get involved against Russia after such a fight broke out. The US and all of the EU would get pulled in.
According the way he does make predictions, if he predict the outcome of 1939 war between German and France, it would be like “Costly German victory, German won’t reach Paris in 2 years.”
STC well yea bc no simulation ever found it likely that germany would win in 6 weeks
True, but it's a prediction so he can't say anything that radical. His sources are only about numbers and countries military doctrines.
Am I the only one interested to see Europe vs US?
yes good idea
Matt Cruiser
Both sides sit on either side of the Atlantic because they can't conduct a naval invasion without extreme losses. The End.
I agree with Binkov. Germany has the strongest economy in the EU yet their military is deteriorating due to lack of funds for training and equipment. Russia may technically win but in the end everyone's economies would collapse. So it would be a very pyric victory.
France would lead the war on EU side
terry2315 Russia won’t win if the U.S was their
Looks like Germany wasn’t the only one with said “deteriorating military” 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Why isn’t the U.K. involved even tho they are leaving theirs no way they will leave them to be conquered
2nd scenario will include all euro members, UK would be the least likely to get involved if the USA does not since they imagine themselves as an island in the middle of an ocean (cgpgrey) instead of part of europe
nilloc93 yes but it’s always been their policy to render military support to the Eu, the U.K. depends on the Eu for trade, and theirs no way their going to let the Russians stay at their door step, im not trying to big the brits up but they could take on Russia alone if they wanted to they have a far more powerful and modern navy and and a technology edge over Russia, not to mention they are far far richer so can finance a war longer
we haven't left NATO & never will.
Ничего тупее не видел)
Fit Sunfit почему не видел, у этого парня все видео маразм, и как только я попал на этот канал.
Ну хоть узнал сколько оружия у России. Хотя..смысл клепать технику в большом количестве, когда через пять лет уже будут создано новое.
fran healy, далеко не через пять лет. И "старая" техника используется совместно с новой, ибо новую потом еще десяток лет будут поставлять на замену.
Старую можно продать или "сбагрить союзным группировкам". Многое просто консервируют на черный день.
Dmitry Volkov ну я образно. Вроде как создают технику и оружие с разными задачами.
Нет смысла создавать кучу с400 когда можно использовать тот же панцирь. Вот сверхзвуковые ракеты создают. Я в этом профан конечно. Но полностью отказываться от старой техники - то зачем. Можно модернизировать, или в тех или иных задачах использовать старую технику, благо ее же много.
Тот же авионесущий крейсер если и построят, то только на экспорт.
До смотрел до того момента, как мы отдали Калининград, большего маразма я не видел. Такое чувство, что автор этого видео диванный аналитик.
@@franhealy5805 количество вооружения России в э ом видео сильно занижены
Russian fan boys vs the European nationalists FIGHT!
Have your chemotherapy ready, this is gonna get cancerous
walter riser lol what European nationalists? Now they're all like "we love immigrants and the Middle East!" Lol
Europe will be destroyed from within by Islamic Extremism, using Soviet made weapons.
And we already know that regardless of any scenario consideration, Paris and France will surrender on day 1 without any fight.
Gel Mir Why would France surrender? They actually won 60% of all wars.
Well this didn't age well.
Before watching, my bet is on EU. Just in terms of economic power, any one of Germany, UK, or France is superior to Russia let alone all 3 combined
Cyrus Gideon Whatever you said doesn't really depend on warfare.
Part of the reason for their stronger economies is lesser military spending,
If Britain joined the strong air force would help, we would be like a mini usa, supplying most of the air troops
Rwandian Productions Even if we add Britain to the European Union, Russia will win anyway
EU would probably not defend Ukraine in case of an attack. But the lisbon treaty states that an attack on any EU country would result in every member aiding the country. So the moment Russia attacks the baltics the rest of the members would come to their aid. If they didnt that would be very bad for their diplomatic image in the region and would result in sanctions. I believe even the UK would join the coalition because it's in their best interests to keep russian influence in Europe minimal.
Oh for sure, people would turn to a civil war knowing an EU nation is being attacked and their government is ditching alliances.
The main military alliance in the EU is NATO, which is a defensive alliance. In this video the EU attacked first.
the UK would join the same time the Americans did.
Technically the Britain and France also have treaty to protect Poland from Nazi invasion...
Leugim the Budapest agreement literally says that Ukraine's borders and sovereignty should be respected. If Ukraine is attacked by a country, all signers must join the war. I can't remember all of the signers, but Russia, the UK, and the US signed.
Question: Is Binkovs hand puppet a frog or a lizard?
Yes
Idk but it’s cute and I want it
Lizard
lizard
Chicken Nugger6
Aha russia sends forces to protect Peace 😂
Roman Opiela ?
That sounds like some american excuse to take a middle east country
The Soviet Cat DAMN
@@legendindaturk8745
DAMN BOI HE THICK
Enforce
Interesting. I'd say that Russia would have a hard time pushing into Europe, but without many significant countries Europe wouldn't do very well either.
Kazakhstan,Belarus and Armenia will probably join because Russia has a pact with them
Nato kein moral wie Rusland
Rusland verliert nie.!!!!
Vojin Kalezic do you fucking think that I can speak fucking German?
Bul Wyf 1997 oh
Anyone else coming to this video now?