2023 Jeep Wagoneer driver-side small overlap IIHS crash test

2023 Jeep Wagoneer 40 mph driver-side small overlap front IIHS crash test
Overall evaluation: Good
Full rating at go.iihs.org/2023Wagoneer
Subscribe: go.iihs.org/subscribe
View Our Website: www.iihs.org/
Follow us:
Twitter: / iihs_autosafety
Facebook: / iihs.org
Instagram: go.iihs.org/instagram
LinkedIn: go.iihs.org/linkedin

[@Omnis2]

This Jeep actually did pretty well. The Expedition was shameful. You'd be dead or legless in a small overlap. The amount of crash energy having to be dealt with by these massive vehicles is astonishing. They should update the test to crash into a midsize sedan... but if they did that, then these huge SUVs probably wouldn't stop.

[@titan9259]

You'd survive, just be crippled.

[@porothepotato]

I remembered how there wasn’t any Jeep branding anywhere in this vehicle except for a tiny one on the lower part of the mirror, watch the Doug DeMuro review to find out

[@sergeyborisov1637]

Well, it is a RAM.

[@DioTheGreatOne]

This thing has the price AND the size of a house, so the least it could do is be safe.

[@TYPICALTRYHARD_]

The safety shell definitely got compromised sh_it folded in the middle like a piece of paper any faster and it would just crush itself

[@titan9259]

And thus he structure was rated good but acceptable

[@themobkiller6799]

the infotainment screen is flashing red 😮

[@rapide12345]

It's not flashing red, it's PWM (Pulse Width Modulation).

[@themobkiller6799]

@@rapide12345 ah i see

[@boostav]

No passenger side test like the Expedition and Tahoe?

[@titan9259]

Chrysler conducted the test instead of the IIHS.

[@boostav]

@@titan9259 Not sure what you're going on about, these were all tested by the IIHS. For the Tahoe and Expedition they posted videos of the passenger side as well as the driver side, for the Wagoneer just the driver side.

[@titan9259]

@@boostav I'm not sure how to explain this to you but the IIHS doesn't test cars in some tests if the manufacturer has done the test themselves.

[@0w3nn]

⁠@@boostav The Jeep Wagoneer was re-introduced in the 2023 model year after a 31-year absence from the market. Passenger-side small overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2023 Wagoneer conducted by Stellantis as part of frontal crash test verification.

[@2turbogaming]

The body of the car had been bent and surprisingly it still got a good for the crash test.

[@legioner9]

Are you smarter and know better than the engineers who conducted the crash-test?

[@notmyfaultthisishappening3795]

@@legioner9Body on frame is truly primitive and terrible. Bent like a snake. It’s so easy to create a crappy body to slap on top of a ladder frame.

[@wizard1515]

@@legioner9 it bent and front pillars are fold. not looking good at all bro

[@legioner9]

@@wizard1515 My question from above awaits an answer.

[@wizard1515]

@@legioner9 We have "right to questioning" what we saw. We ain't deaf n mute bro.
Bunch of Japanese Automakers are getting sue from misinformation and equipment in crash test yesterday.
And those tested are from official crash test lab and from a lot of engineers what you trusted.
Your arguement are not valid at all.

[@krittathananant4444]

สภาพรถพังขนาดนี้ได้ Good เหรอ? ดูแล้วตัวรถไม่สามารถรับแรงชนที่ความเร็มสูกมากกว่าความเร็วนี้อีกแล้ว

[@lilpeppa117G]

Unacceptable

[@titan9259]

It got a good rating in this test.

[@nicholascernatescu6685]

It literally passed are your eyes closed

[@GXLDFISHYT]

bros blind 😭🙏

[@AlexFit-hl7xw]

Это выглядит плохо!