You see Your Honour, I was so high on drugs that I had to let a 13yo drive the car to get her tattoo done where I pretended to be her mother and illegally signed a bunch of forms. So....do I win now? 🤣
Letting a thirteen year old DRIVE and get a tattoo?? I get why the daughter wanted to stay at the defendants house. She was obviously a “cool mom” that let the kids do whatever they wanted. I feel bad for her daughter, no wonder she’s failing her classes.
I don’t know if she’s the “cool” mom. I think she’s the “out of it” mom. She couldn’t even remember part of the things JJ was asking her. The tattoo artist remembered everything exactly😂
@texasplayboy23 She remembered everything, I assure you. She was definitely one of the moms trying to be "cool". I had one and knew others as a kid. That lady smokes weed and drinks with kids. Don't let the haircut, glasses and vest fool you.
She acted lime it was totally normal to be for her 13 yeaol old to be driving. Could you imagine what a cop would say with the mother in the back seat??? This could have ended a lot worse than a tattoo
The plaintiff is the one completely irresponsible and reckless, letting her daughter stay two weeks to two months at some stranger's house who is doped up on medication.
@@jasonrodgers9063 Its the parent's job to raise and monitor who their children spend time with. The plaintiff let the defendant raise her kid for two weeks, while she was at home unemployed.
@@syckles That's why they said BOTH genius. Because what adult in their right mind would ever sign for someone else's child to get a tattoo and piercing? That is text book irresponsible. You cannot give her a pass just because the plaintiff is also a failing parent and adult. Two dumbos don't make a genius.
iykeharrison9161: that's what I was thinking as well. The plaintiff says that the defendant is a drug addict, yet she allowed her barely-teenage daughter to live there for two weeks? (Not buying the two months) Let's see, during that time she got to drive a car (with an adult who was under the influence), got a belly button piercing, and a tattoo. Makes me wonder what else she tried while there...weed? Alcohol?
When my daughter was asked to study with a friend, they met at the library or sat at my kitchen table while they studied. There was no need for either child to make an extended stay with someone.
@@themirrorsofmymindno shit sherlock holmes. What they meant is that CPS should've been called at the time since bothe the girls were minors with completely reckless and irresponsible parent figures.
The defendant clearly is dealing with some mental health issues. She still appears in a fog. Some medications will do that. Thank God, she's not driving, but allowing her 13 yr old to drive is another bad idea.
@@HelenByrd-yf9cfThat's so cute that you are buying into her charade. The defendant abuses drugs and alcohol and let's her child and her friends do whatever they want. She is in disguise, not a victim
I'd be so roasted by JJ... I'm a very (too much) respectful person, but any time I have to think (for example, to explain something that happened to me), I cross my arms. x)
She let a 13 year old drive a car, get a navel piercing, get a tattoo, and pretended to be the child's mother ALL WITHIN THE SPAN OF TWO WEEKS. Imagine what she could have done if she had more time.
I don't agree. The lady lied and said she was the mother. Signed a concent form. Also let her drive at 13 years old. Maybe she shouldn't have been allowed to stay there, but the woman has no right to sign anything for a child that's not hers.
@@justcogitating Me too. That little girl's brain won't be fully developed until her mid-twenties and she was under the defendant's care. If responsibility should be shared, it should have been $2,000 from the adult fraudulent defendant and $1,000 from the plaintiff; not the other way around.
@@JamieM470I disagree I think the case outcome was perfect. She knew full well her mother didn't want her to get the tattoo. Sat there and allowed the defendant to lie to the tatto shop and on top of the the mother knew the defendant wasn't I'm her right mind (Why else would she bring up the reason the defendant was medicated)and still allowed her daughter to stay there for 2 weeks. If I'm being honest all three parties are at the very least all negligent.
Crissy's mother, Robin, is like the woman who let an 8 (or 5)-year-old take a pit bulldog for a walk. She's pretty furious with Nancy but Crissy is *HER* daughter and she didn't make sure Nancy was stable enough to be looking after another teenage girl.
It should have been the other way around......the defendant should have been made to pay $2,000 and the young girl $1,000. The defendant is obviously a drug addict and a totally irresponsible parent. CPS should look into that family.
Disagree with JJ on this one! No one should sign a permission slip for a child not in their custody, ever. A 13 yr old is too immature to make those decisions and the defendant knew that.
This case would have been influenced by the Gillick principle. Even though not an adult, a child who is sufficiently competent and understands the procedure can consent, even if it is contrary to the parent's wishes.
I Agree applying Gillick in this USA case if she was 15 and wanted to secretly have intercourse with her 15 yo BF and she didn't want to get Pregnant and asked her Dr. for a Birth Control Pill Prescription and she wasn't Catholic... Gillick refers to Medical procedures and I can't Associate Tattoo as a Medical Thing a ma jiggy 🤕
Nah you’re off base. The girl is immature of course, but she admitted herself that she knew EXACTLY what she was doing, and what the friends mother was doing when she lied about being their mom and signed a consent form.
Well 13 year olds can get your parents sent to Jail nowadays for calling them with the wrong "pronoun". Also just because someone is incapable of good judgement does not relieve them of responsibility completely. And that's exactly how Judge Judy meted the punishment... A third, a third, a third.
So the plaintiff says the defendant was abusing prescription meds and went into the hospital and came out on even more meds which means the defendant had a problem yet she left her 13 yr old daughter there 😅😅😅😅😅😅....ok then!!! Her and her daughter arent as lovely as they want us to believe. They all need help... Hopefully they got it as this is an old case.
One of them had been taught a good lesson: she's responsible of her action. So, it surely helped her to become a good person. :) And her friend might have had a 2nd hand good lesson too.
Right, that lady that gave the consent should take full responsibility for the removal of that tattoo. In fact, if I was the mom I would have even made a police report that she fraudulently signed a document pretending to me my daughter's mom. The girl Crissy I agree should get some sort of punishment from the mom for her disobedience, but that tattoo would not have been on her no matter how much she begged and begged if that lady didn't sign the consent form.
Both litigants are responsible. If the plaintiff knew the other woman was on drugs, why would she let her daughter stay there? I would have awarded them nothing at all!
Daughter knew what she was doing. She used the opportunity to get the piercing and tattoo. I agree with JJ. Even if they won the $3k, that tattoo is going no where.
Wow, that's insane. A 13 year old can dupe a 40 year old and then is deemed the most responsible for getting the tattoo done. What a different time, mind blown.
@citytrees1752 I don't think you understand how the developing brain works. Your brain is constantly going through changes and it doesn't stop until you're around 25. They can't make permanent decisions like this. Little stuff that doesn't matter, absolutely yes, hold them accountable, but for the big adult stuff like tattoos and 2k in fines, no, that's adult stuff.
Yes, the 13-year-old should get some responsibility. Like being grounded, or do community service, or get taken away something major that she likes, but that lady should have paid the 3K because she impersonates that child's mother. That tattoo would have not been there no matter how much that 13-year-old wanted it if that lady didn't sign the consent form.
Give the girl credit. She looked perplexed when Judy surprised her by pointing the responsibility finger toward her, but thought on it and accepted the idea.
Rubbish. The thirteen year old did was children do. The adult who forged and lied is 100% responsible. JJ didn't want to pay the $3,000 because it comes out of her profits.
No it doesn't. Production costs are budgeted for the show. There's already money in that "cookie jar" - owned by CBS. It's not like JJ would get what's left over at the end of the day.
@@VisualizeHealing Now you've got me chuckling. A couple thousand bucks from the production budget when they are paying Sheindlin $47 million a year? That amounts to 4/ one hundredths of a percent!! Numerically it's 0.00425%. That's the math, you're welcome. 😅
“I’m doing community services.” Translation: My sentence is X hours of community service and X years probation. Otherwise, she would have said, “I *volunteer* at my local food pantry.”
Oh! She made up a whole story about divorces and name changes, now she's saying she was under the influence!? Either way ma'am you lose...the case AND at life!. One of those parents whose children pull the puppet strings. She literally lied twice because of these juvenile delinquent-girls gone wild.
Some states one cannot get a tattoo until they are 18. A parent cannot sign for them even at that age it is too young , for most do not think of how long a lifetime is
JJ is OK to tell the tattooed girl os partly responsible ok: but she should have still REALLY given it to the drug using airhead who LIED on the consent form and attested she is her mother…with an elaborate story to explain the discrepancy in the names.
Yeah, many teens lie to get away with stuff like this. It really should've leaned the other way with the defendant paying the majority and the 14-year old girl paying a reasonable amount where her mother wouldn't have to more likely than not pick up the majority of the bill if she really wanted the 14-year old girl herself to pay for it. It's not like the lady was signing a consent form for her to go on a school field trip while the parents were out of town. She signed for a permanent tattoo. Wild that JJ didn't slam the defendant with at least $1500 if not $2500 where it might actually be realistic that the plaintiff's daughter could actually earn enough babysitting to get it removed.
Even though the Plaintiffs daughter made stupid choices, I give her props for admitting she is partly at fault. Interesting how one generation later, no one EVER admits any fault.
Definitely not true. I'm a millenial like the girl in this video and my students these days are gen z and they are very responsible. I think it is just the history of humanity that older generations dump on younger ones. It's always been that way and always will. Every generation has responsible and irresponsible people in it.
@@justinenicole3926 I meant that everyone who appears on JJ/courtrooms one generation later (as in 2024) NEVER admit to being wrong. Even when the evidence is overwhelming. It is ALWAYS someone elses fault, and they ALWAYS have a lame excuse/story. But 30 years ago, at least a few of the people in the courtroom had some basic common sense.
Judge Judy was extremely lenient about the dirving thing. Holy crap. In the more recent episodes, if someone was behind the steering wheel of a car and should not have been, Judge Judy would have flogged the people involved. I don't know, but I suspect the defendant (at the time of this recording) has some kind of severe depression issue and she could have been self-medicating and it turned into a different problem (drug abuse). There is just about no will power there. Anyway, hopefully that got straightened out. The plaintiff's daughter had a mature reaction. (She should just say "Yes" instead of "Yeah.")
I think the defendant should have had to pay much more than $1,000. Yes, the 14 year old manipulated her and should have to pay for it but the defendant is a grown woman. I would have filed criminal charges against her too.
I’m sorry but I think the judgement should be the other way around. The defendant should pay $2000 and the plaintiff should pay $1000. The defendant is more liable because she is the responsible party since the plaintiff is a minor. The fact that she let the plaintiff drive and then knowingly lied and signed that she was the plaintiff’s mother, makes her way more liable than a 14 year old in this case.
Wow! So first the defendant said she tried calling the plaintiff a few times to get permission, the she said she was blotto on drugs and made that another excuse for letting the 13 yo drive her car!
I would imagine this case is about 25 years old, based on JJ's appearance...Young Chrissy would be pushing 40 now...I'd be curious as to how she has navigated through life.
Bad judgement in the tattoo case. Person responsible is the adult who lied to the tattoo guy and made under age daughter drive. She should be penalised for that. At least minimum £3000. The girl could have been killed driving. Wrong verdict.
What the heck I would have called the cops and had this woman arrested for endangering my child and anyone else...she is on drugs and letting a 13 year old drive her car??!!! I know this is a show and they both get paid etc...but this should have been treated like a criminal case. The mom saying she let this kid drive because she was on drugs....omg i would be calling child protection services. Too bad they did not get pulled over by the cops for some minor issue cuz wow this mom would have gotten the book thrown at her. Most likely car towed as well as her license revoked and a hefty fine for allowing a child to drive her car..
Why let your child stay for any period of time at all in a home where the adult has been released from a hospital for drug use and is still "doped" up. I shudder to think what else could have gone on besides body modification and a 13- yrar-old driving.
I totally disagree with JJ on this one. The girl is a minor and cannot consent to get a tattoo. Thats why you need an adult to sign for one. If you can't consent, you can't be responsible. The crabby JJ would not have ruled this way.
Sorry, this is not about the relationship between mum and daughter.... She was out of order for doing that... the actual audacity The fault lays CLEAR AMD ONLY with the other mother ... cheek
The defendant's irresponsibility is evident, and it's hard to believe that the plaintiff allowed her 13-year-old daughter to spend more than a night at someone else's house. If the other child needed academic assistance, her mother would have to bring her to my house.
I was waiting for JJ to tell the plaintiff’s daughter “Uncross your arms. There’s only one attitude here.” She changed a lot over the years. And it’s understandable.
None of this is life or death except for the driving. I'm glad that Judy had her deal with the consequences of her actions. That is how young people learn responsibility. And yes, I've dealt with teens. They've grown into decent adults.
I feel like part of the reason Judge Judy didn't award the full amount is that she likely knows that the daughter doesn't actually want the tattoo removed. That's all on her mother. So rather than give to mom the money to force her daughter through a tattoo removal, she awarded her part of the money, as it was clearly the defendants' fault.
JJ was right with this, it’s called teaching accountability to both the girl and her mom. Now the defendant should be charged criminally for doing what she did but at 13 you know if someone is high and know how to get what you want.
One of THEE all time greats, and clearly one of the kindest. We all knew she supported animals, and also the LGBTQ community, but to leave money, without any pomp or circumstance, no fanfare, no publicity.... that to me puts Bea on a much higher level than she was in my mind. One of the most amazing artists, advocates and a truly amazing Lady. We will never EVER know her like again. Today a lot of "celebrity" people don't do anything without telling the Twitter or instagram sphere... for a true artist like Bea to do this and even the guy running the place doesn't know..... An absolute EPIC lady who I miss dearly. Rest in peace Bea, missed and never forgotten. ❤❤
Everybody sucks here. The plaintiff comes off as negligent for dropping her daughter at the home of someone she barely knew, who was on drugs, for an indeterminate time. The defendant seems overly permissive to the point of letting someone ELSE’S kid get a tattoo. (“I’m not just a mom. I’m a Cool Mom.”) I would also bet that the daughter has no desire to remove the tattoo; mom wants her to remove the tattoo because of how it will “look” to other people.
Did the Mother know the other mother had a drug problem? Who lets their 13 year old stay 2 weeks/months with someone with a known drug issue??? The other should be grateful she isn't sitting in a jail cell right now.
My parents let me get tattooed at 16 but i had to stay completely out of trouble, work, and have straight A's and they would have NEVER let me bring a friend. Nancy is completely irresponsible and awful
T%he neighbour has to be totally brai-dead to do something like that without getting the Moms okay. As for the daughter, this may be her first time in court, but it won't be the last !
They are both lucky this was done back then cuz boy oh boy. Today’s judge Judy would have screamed at both of them. I personally think both parent’s are at fault.
I get that she wanted to teach the 14 year old that there needed to be consequences for her actions. Plus her mom had a few screws loose by letting her go live with a stranger for this bizzare reason having to deal with becoming an actress. But the defendant should have paid for like 2/3 of the removal bill instead of the other way around
If the plaintiff can stand there and say the defendant uses drugs and she allowed her daughter to spend time with her, then she is totally responsible. Supposed the defendant had given the plaintiff's daughter drugs, what would be the outcome....NONSENSE
Did she really just try to defend herself by saying that she was wasted on prescription medications at the time?
Yes, heavily drugged. Pfffft.
And letting a minor drive her car 🤬
@@elliebellie7816defendant appeared to still be on some type of medication. Some Dr's over prescribe meds.
You see Your Honour, I was so high on drugs that I had to let a 13yo drive the car to get her tattoo done where I pretended to be her mother and illegally signed a bunch of forms. So....do I win now? 🤣
She did 😂😂😂😂😂
Letting a thirteen year old DRIVE and get a tattoo?? I get why the daughter wanted to stay at the defendants house. She was obviously a “cool mom” that let the kids do whatever they wanted. I feel bad for her daughter, no wonder she’s failing her classes.
I don’t know if she’s the “cool” mom. I think she’s the “out of it” mom. She couldn’t even remember part of the things JJ was asking her. The tattoo artist remembered everything exactly😂
@texasplayboy23 She remembered everything, I assure you. She was definitely one of the moms trying to be "cool". I had one and knew others as a kid. That lady smokes weed and drinks with kids. Don't let the haircut, glasses and vest fool you.
She acted lime it was totally normal to be for her 13 yeaol old to be driving. Could you imagine what a cop would say with the mother in the back seat??? This could have ended a lot worse than a tattoo
Her mother isn't any better letting her live with a stranger for almost 2 months without even speaking to them 🤦
@Frosty0762 It was 2 weeks and she said she talked to her every day
Stop trying to be your child’s friend. Be their PARENT!
Amen! 💯💯💯💯
Be both!
@@DyNaStYCaRl There's the correct answer! That's what you need to do in 21st century.
AMEN!!!
AMEN 🙌🏽
The plaintiff is the one completely irresponsible and reckless, letting her daughter stay two weeks to two months at some stranger's house who is doped up on medication.
BOTH the plaintiff and defendant are completely irresponsible!
@@jasonrodgers9063 Its the parent's job to raise and monitor who their children spend time with. The plaintiff let the defendant raise her kid for two weeks, while she was at home unemployed.
@@syckles That's why they said BOTH genius. Because what adult in their right mind would ever sign for someone else's child to get a tattoo and piercing? That is text book irresponsible. You cannot give her a pass just because the plaintiff is also a failing parent and adult. Two dumbos don't make a genius.
Absolutely 💯
@@elvickRULES You got any words in your vocabulary besides genius, genius?
So the defendant's Mom is a drug addict is my guess. She couldn't drive so she let a 13 year old drive.
She is not fit to be a parent. The Plaintiff is also irresponsible for letting her 13 year old daughter go live in so stranger's house for weeks.
Defendant doesnt know what planet shes on lol
Too bad there's not a where are they now update...
The 14yo looks like 18yo..
Tattoo man is zeroing in on the 14yo
iykeharrison9161: that's what I was thinking as well. The plaintiff says that the defendant is a drug addict, yet she allowed her barely-teenage daughter to live there for two weeks? (Not buying the two months) Let's see, during that time she got to drive a car (with an adult who was under the influence), got a belly button piercing, and a tattoo. Makes me wonder what else she tried while there...weed? Alcohol?
I hope there was also a criminal case filed for child endangerment for allowing a 13 year old to drive.
Defendants daughter is in for a hard life with a mom that gave her no boundaries.
This is from like 30 years ago. lol
The daughter had a look, a demeanor, that indicates she would have some issues around men.
This is almost three decades ago. I'm sure they've settled into their way.
She's probably long dead, by this point.
She's fresh out of rehab by now.
If someone signed consent for my child to be tattooed we'd be in a whole different kind of court.
Seems like the Plaintiff doesn’t want to parent her children. That’s what happens when you pawn your kid off on someone else.
Lol right
sure. keep your kids in your house too.
@@nanjones3973no fr. How is everybody missing that. She pushed her kid on someone else. She was there for two months lol
@@HoneyBee0219
While the lady was heavily medicated 🤦🏻
When my daughter was asked to study with a friend, they met at the library or sat at my kitchen table while they studied. There was no need for either child to make an extended stay with someone.
She isn't getting it removed ,, she just wanted the money !!
The daughter might not want it removed, but you can bet your boots that the mother wants it gone.
@@artistjohshe should’ve been at home with her mother. Not with strangers. Mother’s judgment is flawed
@@HoneyBee0219come on really?? Whoever thinks a child should get a tattoo & piercing has the flawed judgement.
That’s exactly what I thought. It was all over her face. She was trying not to smile… “yeah, ok!! 👌🏻 “ didn’t buy it.
Exactly
Wow… the state i live in says even with parents permission you cant be a minor and get a tattoo
That's what I thought was the norm, that you have to be 18 to get one independently or 16 with parental consent.
But this was back in the day
Yep.
Here in Australia it's against the law to tattoo anyone under 18 years of age. It's also illegal to tattoo anyone who is intoxicated.
Not where I'm from. I got 2 tattoos when I was 16 without any adult's permission. I did have to wait til I was 21 for piercings though.
Child services should be called on the so called medicated friends mother.
This is from the 1990s! Those girls would be adults by now... 🙄
CPS is so dangerous. The outfits tell me this is about 1996. These girls are 40 today.
Absolutely
@@themirrorsofmymindno shit sherlock holmes. What they meant is that CPS should've been called at the time since bothe the girls were minors with completely reckless and irresponsible parent figures.
That defendant is plain stupid. This lady is fighting for first place in Darwin contest.
Yoooo😂😂😂😂 I screamed not fighting for 1st place
The defendant clearly is dealing with some mental health issues. She still appears in a fog. Some medications will do that. Thank God, she's not driving, but allowing her 13 yr old to drive is another bad idea.
Darwin awards aren’t solely for stupidity, one has to remove themselves from the gene pool and she already has a daughter.
@@HelenByrd-yf9cfThat's so cute that you are buying into her charade. The defendant abuses drugs and alcohol and let's her child and her friends do whatever they want. She is in disguise, not a victim
Should have kept your daughter home instead of letting her go to a home with drug abusive adults!
Judge Judy's voice ringed in my ear at 00:39 'UNCROSS YOUR ARMS!!!'
😂 I kept waiting for her to say that!
I'd be so roasted by JJ... I'm a very (too much) respectful person, but any time I have to think (for example, to explain something that happened to me), I cross my arms. x)
"I don't remember giving her permission"
Shiiiiiiid Id say not 😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂
She let a 13 year old drive a car, get a navel piercing, get a tattoo, and pretended to be the child's mother ALL WITHIN THE SPAN OF TWO WEEKS. Imagine what she could have done if she had more time.
Thirty years ago and she’s using the “ I was high” and don’t remember excuse🤣😂🤣
I don't agree. The lady lied and said she was the mother. Signed a concent form. Also let her drive at 13 years old. Maybe she shouldn't have been allowed to stay there, but the woman has no right to sign anything for a child that's not hers.
If that kid has to come up with $2000, that tattoo is not coming off any time soon
😂😂😂
Agree, and I still think the adult who lied and who allowed a 13 year old to drive is more at fault in this case.
@@justcogitating Me too. That little girl's brain won't be fully developed until her mid-twenties and she was under the defendant's care.
If responsibility should be shared, it should have been $2,000 from the adult fraudulent defendant and $1,000 from the plaintiff; not the other way around.
I really thought she was going to split it down the the middle and do $1,500 each or $2000 defendant, $1000 plaintiff. I was a bit surprised.
@@JamieM470I disagree I think the case outcome was perfect. She knew full well her mother didn't want her to get the tattoo. Sat there and allowed the defendant to lie to the tatto shop and on top of the the mother knew the defendant wasn't I'm her right mind (Why else would she bring up the reason the defendant was medicated)and still allowed her daughter to stay there for 2 weeks. If I'm being honest all three parties are at the very least all negligent.
Seasoned Judge Judy would have told the girl to stop crossing her arm 😆
Parents need to STOP being their children's friends and parent their children!!!!
Crissy's mother, Robin, is like the woman who let an 8 (or 5)-year-old take a pit bulldog for a walk. She's pretty furious with Nancy but Crissy is *HER* daughter and she didn't make sure Nancy was stable enough to be looking after another teenage girl.
100% correct
It should have been the other way around......the defendant should have been made to pay $2,000 and the young girl $1,000. The defendant is obviously a drug addict and a totally irresponsible parent. CPS should look into that family.
Disagree with JJ on this one! No one should sign a permission slip for a child not in their custody, ever. A 13 yr old is too immature to make those decisions and the defendant knew that.
This case would have been influenced by the Gillick principle. Even though not an adult, a child who is sufficiently competent and understands the procedure can consent, even if it is contrary to the parent's wishes.
I Agree applying Gillick in this USA case if she was 15 and wanted to secretly have intercourse with her 15 yo BF and she didn't want to get Pregnant and asked her Dr. for a Birth Control Pill Prescription and she wasn't Catholic...
Gillick refers to Medical procedures and I can't Associate Tattoo as a Medical Thing a ma jiggy 🤕
Nah you’re off base. The girl is immature of course, but she admitted herself that she knew EXACTLY what she was doing, and what the friends mother was doing when she lied about being their mom and signed a consent form.
Well 13 year olds can get your parents sent to Jail nowadays for calling them with the wrong "pronoun".
Also just because someone is incapable of good judgement does not relieve them of responsibility completely. And that's exactly how Judge Judy meted the punishment... A third, a third, a third.
Wasn't the child technically in her "custody" for 2 weeks or do you mean given parental right?
Can’t believe the defendant wasn’t criminally charged.
So the plaintiff says the defendant was abusing prescription meds and went into the hospital and came out on even more meds which means the defendant had a problem yet she left her 13 yr old daughter there 😅😅😅😅😅😅....ok then!!! Her and her daughter arent as lovely as they want us to believe. They all need help... Hopefully they got it as this is an old case.
Yea I caught on to that too
I can't even imagine how both teens turned out in their adult lives
One of them had been taught a good lesson: she's responsible of her action. So, it surely helped her to become a good person. :) And her friend might have had a 2nd hand good lesson too.
I disagree with this judgement in its entirety.
Exactly. At least they could send the check straight to the clinic where the removal would be done.
Because?
Agreed. Minors cannot make contracts legally.
And that’s why you’re not a judge 😂 no one should listen to you
Right, that lady that gave the consent should take full responsibility for the removal of that tattoo. In fact, if I was the mom I would have even made a police report that she fraudulently signed a document pretending to me my daughter's mom. The girl Crissy I agree should get some sort of punishment from the mom for her disobedience, but that tattoo would not have been on her no matter how much she begged and begged if that lady didn't sign the consent form.
This woman is so irresponsible
Both mothers are irresponsible
@@harryrob8221 agree 💯
That’s why her daughter looks like TROUBLE
Which one the blonde one or the brunette?
@@arioniscool both
Crissy looks and acts like a 30-year-old. Her life may be short and brutal if she doesn't smarten up.
💯
No?
Well she’s 44 now?
Both litigants are responsible. If the plaintiff knew the other woman was on drugs, why would she let her daughter stay there? I would have awarded them nothing at all!
Daughter knew what she was doing. She used the opportunity to get the piercing and tattoo. I agree with JJ. Even if they won the $3k, that tattoo is going no where.
Wow, that's insane. A 13 year old can dupe a 40 year old and then is deemed the most responsible for getting the tattoo done. What a different time, mind blown.
Kids aren't held responsible for anything anymore.
@citytrees1752 I don't think you understand how the developing brain works. Your brain is constantly going through changes and it doesn't stop until you're around 25. They can't make permanent decisions like this. Little stuff that doesn't matter, absolutely yes, hold them accountable, but for the big adult stuff like tattoos and 2k in fines, no, that's adult stuff.
Yes, the 13-year-old should get some responsibility. Like being grounded, or do community service, or get taken away something major that she likes, but that lady should have paid the 3K because she impersonates that child's mother. That tattoo would have not been there no matter how much that 13-year-old wanted it if that lady didn't sign the consent form.
Everyone but the tattoo artist lied at one point to JJ.
Give the girl credit. She looked perplexed when Judy surprised her by pointing the responsibility finger toward her, but thought on it and accepted the idea.
This is why in Australia it is illegal for anyone to do a tattoo on an under 18 year old.
And yet they can go and get their twigs/berries & bits/bobs cut off without consent 🤔 work that out
UNCROSS YOUR ARMS!!!!!
I wanted that so badly!
😁
Me too!!!!
Rubbish. The thirteen year old did was children do. The adult who forged and lied is 100% responsible. JJ didn't want to pay the $3,000 because it comes out of her profits.
No it doesn't. Production costs are budgeted for the show. There's already money in that "cookie jar" - owned by CBS. It's not like JJ would get what's left over at the end of the day.
@@wintercame Ultimately it does. do the math. If her budget is too high by awarding too much over time, guess what happens?
@@VisualizeHealing Now you've got me chuckling. A couple thousand bucks from the production budget when they are paying Sheindlin $47 million a year? That amounts to 4/ one hundredths of a percent!! Numerically it's 0.00425%. That's the math, you're welcome. 😅
Lolll she gets paid by contract you muppet. Just because you don’t agree means you go and slander someone with zero evidence? Shame on you
“I’m doing community services.”
Translation: My sentence is X hours of community service and X years probation.
Otherwise, she would have said, “I *volunteer* at my local food pantry.”
Oh! She made up a whole story about divorces and name changes, now she's saying she was under the influence!? Either way ma'am you lose...the case AND at life!.
One of those parents whose children pull the puppet strings. She literally lied twice because of these juvenile delinquent-girls gone wild.
Some states one cannot get a tattoo until they are 18. A parent cannot sign for them
even at that age it is too young , for most do not think of how long a lifetime is
I couldn't have given permission your honor, I was high as giraffe's ass!
JJ is OK to tell the tattooed girl os partly responsible ok: but she should have still REALLY given it to
the drug using airhead who LIED on the consent form and attested she is her mother…with an elaborate story to explain the discrepancy in the names.
Yeah, many teens lie to get away with stuff like this. It really should've leaned the other way with the defendant paying the majority and the 14-year old girl paying a reasonable amount where her mother wouldn't have to more likely than not pick up the majority of the bill if she really wanted the 14-year old girl herself to pay for it. It's not like the lady was signing a consent form for her to go on a school field trip while the parents were out of town. She signed for a permanent tattoo. Wild that JJ didn't slam the defendant with at least $1500 if not $2500 where it might actually be realistic that the plaintiff's daughter could actually earn enough babysitting to get it removed.
That woman is the epitome of "I'm not a regular mom, I'm a cool mom."
Even though the Plaintiffs daughter made stupid choices, I give her props for admitting she is partly at fault. Interesting how one generation later, no one EVER admits any fault.
Definitely not true. I'm a millenial like the girl in this video and my students these days are gen z and they are very responsible. I think it is just the history of humanity that older generations dump on younger ones. It's always been that way and always will. Every generation has responsible and irresponsible people in it.
@@justinenicole3926 I meant that everyone who appears on JJ/courtrooms one generation later (as in 2024) NEVER admit to being wrong. Even when the evidence is overwhelming. It is ALWAYS someone elses fault, and they ALWAYS have a lame excuse/story. But 30 years ago, at least a few of the people in the courtroom had some basic common sense.
both the mothers & both their daughters are so nice! Very good people!
I’m guessing we don’t get to see the drawings of the tattoos! What do you think? Teddy bear or a cobra 🐍
Butterfly or a rose. But probably a 🦋
❤
☠️ 👈🏻 This comes to mind
That's what I was going to say@@brocktoon8
@@PartyOf8Please 😆
Of course she doesn’t remember signing anything she was high AF. This is crazy.
Judge Judy was extremely lenient about the dirving thing. Holy crap. In the more recent episodes, if someone was behind the steering wheel of a car and should not have been, Judge Judy would have flogged the people involved. I don't know, but I suspect the defendant (at the time of this recording) has some kind of severe depression issue and she could have been self-medicating and it turned into a different problem (drug abuse). There is just about no will power there. Anyway, hopefully that got straightened out. The plaintiff's daughter had a mature reaction. (She should just say "Yes" instead of "Yeah.")
right?! I thought she was a bit nicer in her older episodes!
Crissy waa not expecting to be called mature 😂
I think the defendant should have had to pay much more than $1,000. Yes, the 14 year old manipulated her and should have to pay for it but the defendant is a grown woman. I would have filed criminal charges against her too.
You do know that no one pays anything on this TV SHOW, right?
“I don’t remember”
No sh*t you don’t remember! 😳🤣
The defendant should pay 3/4 not just half
She paid a third.
No. Kid is 14, lied outright to the defendant. Deserves 1/2 responsibility. Actions have consequences.
I’m sorry but I think the judgement should be the other way around. The defendant should pay $2000 and the plaintiff should pay $1000. The defendant is more liable because she is the responsible party since the plaintiff is a minor. The fact that she let the plaintiff drive and then knowingly lied and signed that she was the plaintiff’s mother, makes her way more liable than a 14 year old in this case.
Her defense is that she’s too high to remember, haha
any parent who wants to be friends with their daughter is a bad mother
Wow! So first the defendant said she tried calling the plaintiff a few times to get permission, the she said she was blotto on drugs and made that another excuse for letting the 13 yo drive her car!
I would imagine this case is about 25 years old, based on JJ's appearance...Young Chrissy would be pushing 40 now...I'd be curious as to how she has navigated through life.
And they did not get the tattoos and the belly rings at the same moment. But on the same day. LOL!
The tattoo can serve as a good reminder to her for the rest of her life
Bad judgement in the tattoo case. Person responsible is the adult who lied to the tattoo guy and made under age daughter drive. She should be penalised for that. At least minimum £3000. The girl could have been killed driving. Wrong verdict.
What the heck I would have called the cops and had this woman arrested for endangering my child and anyone else...she is on drugs and letting a 13 year old drive her car??!!! I know this is a show and they both get paid etc...but this should have been treated like a criminal case. The mom saying she let this kid drive because she was on drugs....omg i would be calling child protection services. Too bad they did not get pulled over by the cops for some minor issue cuz wow this mom would have gotten the book thrown at her. Most likely car towed as well as her license revoked and a hefty fine for allowing a child to drive her car..
Why let your child stay for any period of time at all in a home where the adult has been released from a hospital for drug use and is still "doped" up. I shudder to think what else could have gone on besides body modification and a 13- yrar-old driving.
I totally disagree with JJ on this one. The girl is a minor and cannot consent to get a tattoo. Thats why you need an adult to sign for one. If you can't consent, you can't be responsible. The crabby JJ would not have ruled this way.
Where are they now?
Sorry, this is not about the relationship between mum and daughter....
She was out of order for doing that... the actual audacity
The fault lays CLEAR AMD ONLY with the other mother ... cheek
Nope, she shouldn't have kids if she is going to pawn them off for weeks at a time with some strung out stranger.
I have a feeling defendant did this out of spite. Jealous of plaintiff mom maybe??
4:37 the girl's sly smile when Judge Judy mentions the $3,000 to have it surgically removed. She's not having anything removed!
The defendant's irresponsibility is evident, and it's hard to believe that the plaintiff allowed her 13-year-old daughter to spend more than a night at someone else's house. If the other child needed academic assistance, her mother would have to bring her to my house.
I was waiting for JJ to tell the plaintiff’s daughter “Uncross your arms. There’s only one attitude here.” She changed a lot over the years. And it’s understandable.
None of this is life or death except for the driving. I'm glad that Judy had her deal with the consequences of her actions. That is how young people learn responsibility. And yes, I've dealt with teens. They've grown into decent adults.
I feel like part of the reason Judge Judy didn't award the full amount is that she likely knows that the daughter doesn't actually want the tattoo removed. That's all on her mother. So rather than give to mom the money to force her daughter through a tattoo removal, she awarded her part of the money, as it was clearly the defendants' fault.
Setting no boundaries at all in the name of giving your child "freedom" is the laziest, most reckless form of patenting.
JJ was right with this, it’s called teaching accountability to both the girl and her mom. Now the defendant should be charged criminally for doing what she did but at 13 you know if someone is high and know how to get what you want.
What a pair of entitled brats.....and the Mothers are no better....
I can tell you right now that Chrissy most likely did not pay any part of that tattoo removal 😂
Curiosity led me to Google: in the UK, nobody under the age of 18 can [legally] get a tattoo, even with parental permission.
One of THEE all time greats, and clearly one of the kindest. We all knew she supported animals, and also the LGBTQ community, but to leave money, without any pomp or circumstance, no fanfare, no publicity.... that to me puts Bea on a much higher level than she was in my mind.
One of the most amazing artists, advocates and a truly amazing Lady.
We will never EVER know her like again.
Today a lot of "celebrity" people don't do anything without telling the Twitter or instagram sphere... for a true artist like Bea to do this and even the guy running the place doesn't know.....
An absolute EPIC lady who I miss dearly. Rest in peace Bea, missed and never forgotten. ❤❤
Defendants daughter is already out of control. Lousy parenting.
No way in hell should this woman have took apoud herself to get this CHILD to get a tattoo 😕 Criminal chargeshould be brought against this woman.
She thought being 14 is a getaway card.
How many 14 yo teens do you know that make smart, mature, rational decisions? I'll wait.
Everybody sucks here. The plaintiff comes off as negligent for dropping her daughter at the home of someone she barely knew, who was on drugs, for an indeterminate time. The defendant seems overly permissive to the point of letting someone ELSE’S kid get a tattoo. (“I’m not just a mom. I’m a Cool Mom.”) I would also bet that the daughter has no desire to remove the tattoo; mom wants her to remove the tattoo because of how it will “look” to other people.
They both should be ashamed to be seen in court. Those mothers should have just admitted they let those kids do what they want . 2 months ?!?
I’m amazed at this one. The reason you need to be 18 or have an adult sign is because teenagers aren’t capable of making decisions like this.
Did the Mother know the other mother had a drug problem? Who lets their 13 year old stay 2 weeks/months with someone with a known drug issue??? The other should be grateful she isn't sitting in a jail cell right now.
The Mother Was Smart To Get The Tattoo Artist Who Did This
My parents let me get tattooed at 16 but i had to stay completely out of trouble, work, and have straight A's and they would have NEVER let me bring a friend.
Nancy is completely irresponsible and awful
T%he neighbour has to be totally brai-dead to do something like that without getting the Moms okay. As for the daughter, this may be her first time in court, but it won't be the last !
Great job 👍!
These people are a mess. I hope the children turned out better than their parents.
With mothers like that, it's no wonder those girls are the way they are.
Yea, your out of your mind…that’s a understatement 🙄
They are both lucky this was done back then cuz boy oh boy. Today’s judge Judy would have screamed at both of them. I personally think both parent’s are at fault.
why can't the woman be prosecuted in some way
if she's mature enough to work, she is mature enough to decide to keep the tattoo
these girls knew mom was loopy took advantage of her in order to get a tattoo simple judge Judy always does a great job
I get that she wanted to teach the 14 year old that there needed to be consequences for her actions. Plus her mom had a few screws loose by letting her go live with a stranger for this bizzare reason having to deal with becoming an actress. But the defendant should have paid for like 2/3 of the removal bill instead of the other way around
If the plaintiff can stand there and say the defendant uses drugs and she allowed her daughter to spend time with her, then she is totally responsible. Supposed the defendant had given the plaintiff's daughter drugs, what would be the outcome....NONSENSE
I like the later episodes of Judge Judy. She is to nice in these earlier episodes.
And this is why you don’t let your kids stay with their friends lol