KLM’s decision to adopt the A321neo reflects broader trends in the aviation industry. It’s great to see airlines investing in newer, more efficient aircraft.
any old aircraft will have issues such as old airframe etc, the reason the A320 has less crashes is because the 737 came out in late 60's, a year where commercial jet aviation was new. compared to the A320 1984 which came in a time where aviation was more advanced.
@@OfficialDoggyYT Not really. A320 are much safer planes because they’re modern redundant fly by wire machines with many software protections since the first day they were introduced back in the late 80s. A Max is still the old cables and pulleys concept. It’s the oldest tech aircraft Boeing still produces, it doesn’t even feature a EICAS, something even 757 and 767 already have. Except for the Max (because MCAS), 737s are good reliable planes, but they’re like a good vehicle from the 70s restored with more modern and efficient engines.
@@miks564 exactly what I said, the A320 came out in a time where commercial jet aviation was somewhat new, the technological advanced etc, you just proved my point. If it was the other way around you can bet the A320 would have more crashes
Flying is an acceptable risk, but flying with Boeing means pushing the limits of what is acceptable. Passenger comfort, safety and sense of security should not be underestimated. With Boeing that is long gone.
KLM’s switch to the A321neo makes a lot of sense given the fuel efficiency and environmental benefits. Excited to see how this impacts their operations!
Not to forget that the Airbus planes (except the 220 which probably will be overhaled soon) can be flown with minimal training on each type. That is waht Boing tried to do with the MCA sor their 737 and the new Max planes. They failed to do it successfully because tey were to cheap and did not do it properly. People died due to this. I would not fly a Boeing for the foreseeable future-except the 747. That is so old, it has matured enough to work.
As a fan of aviation, I'm excited to see KLM embracing the A321Neo. This aircraft has a lot to offer in terms of efficiency, range, and passenger comfort.
With the A321neo’s extended range, KLM will be able to explore new routes and offer better connectivity. This is a smart move for their fleet strategy.
KLM's decision to move away from Boeing shows what for L they are.* Moving away from a company you have been working with ever since 1920 is a backstab.
The A321neo’s improved capacity and noise reduction features are impressive. KLM’s passengers will likely appreciate the more comfortable and quieter flights.
KLM's shift to the A321Neo shows their commitment to efficiency and sustainability. It's great to see airlines making choices that benefit both their operations and the environment!
For long time i may say i am fan of Boeing, but since the problems that Boeing cannot solve and the good developments at Airbus i can no longer say that. Also, support your local, and together with Air France, KLM has a great deal for the choice to switch over. Transavia also did a great job to switch over to the Neo's. Thumbs up for both. Wish them both many safe flight hours.
Come on, right now you gotta be really confident to fly new Boeing planes given all that has spilled out of their backyard. I certainly avoid the MAX and will keep doing that for many years. The fact that the producer basically lied to the operators and the authorities is brutal and reduces to zero the confidence. The NEO has simply bigger+more efficient engines, and for a few generations this has been enough to compel operators to new planes, since fuel is their biggest spending. The NEO with its fuel efficiency is like a Small Dreamliner or A350, very suitable to long point to point routes.
The decision to move away from the 737 to the A321neo shows KLM’s commitment to modernizing its fleet. Great choice for reducing costs and improving performance.
KLM were Douglas customers WAY before Boeing. I believe they had nearly every model that Douglas and then McDonnell Douglas made, When boeing took MD Over, they went with Boeing, however, have had had Airbus before
It's also fair to add that Boeing has been forced into slowing down it's operations by the FAA who unsurprisingly wants to keep a closer eye on how the American company goes about their business and so Boeing aren't able to fulfill their orders as quickly. The knock-on effect of this is that some airlines will look elsewhere. KLM has already bought several Embraer airliners and are currently replacing their 737s with a321neo as you have touched on. They have also ordered several a350 to replace their Dreamliners but delivery isn't until 2026 for these long-haul airliners.
The A321Neo's quieter engines and increased passenger capacity are major advantages for KLM. Passengers will definitely appreciate the improved experience.
@@FLIGAVIA Flew with TAP on 330 and 321, and i was surprised by this aircraft. (had to book extra legroom tho). Was quiet, could have a solid rest on a long haul flight. With KLM's friendly staff i possibly would choose for them. And sometimes you can have really good deals with KLM, even tho they are mostly a bit on the high price. But you get what you pay for... KLM is solid good.
The statement that KLM could be an all Boeing-company is factually incorrect. For shorthaul KLM has heavily invested in Embraers. So, KLM always kept their options open.
Had a friend who lived in the Amsterdam neighbourhood of Buitenveldert, some 600 meters from the descending planes using the socalled Buitenveldertbaan, runway 09/27. godawful noise even at 600 meters distance and especially so in the early morning. Noise reduction for Schipho; is a major thing for the people of the region even if it is not so much a commercial driver like using less fuel or flying farther with the same amount or transport more for the same amount of fuel.
Yes I also live in the Netherlands and everytime I fly from Schiphol i hear the Boeingplanes make so fucking much noise yeah can hear the everywhere in the airport sometimes also silently in the bathrooms
And let’s also not forget the aspect that Schiphol is requiring reduced noise levels from airlines to resolve or at least accommodate long lasting complaints about too high noise levels from people living in the vicinity of Schiphol Airport. As due to the expansions over the years -both of Schiphol and of the built up / housing areas surrounding the airport- noise pollution had become and still remains to be an also politically sensitive issue.
KLM’s focus on fuel efficiency with the A321neo aligns with current industry trends towards sustainability. This move could set an example for other airlines.
Sign of the times , Boeing current issues started many years ago , I just watched a TV aircraft investigation involving Boeing complacency many years ago . Boeing could fold as an aircraft manufacturer I believe. They have themselves to blame . Boeing using an updated aircraft based on the old 737 , they can not complete with airbus , providing new and better aircraft . If it a Boeing I am not going , if I flying Boeing I may end up going ! Reputation is vital for survival in the airline industry.
It is an Air France decision! KLM has no influence in this decision. AirFrance/KLM the most expensive price for an outdated interior and service! Bye-bye KLM...never fly again with the most arrogant personal they have!
Plus the engines can't run in synthetic aviation fuel SAF. It's main Dutch hub wants to cut flights but not passengers, so "bigger" planes need to be ordered now for definite delivery while cutting costs so that a bigger seat capacity plane can run with less passengers at the same profit margin. It may also be an indication that Airbus pilots are "easier" to recruit. Mostly is frustrated Boeing has as this will add to KLMs cost in having two fleet types even if the 787 would be less efficient on paper
I am surprised that you do not mention the fact that the Airbus A321 neo is delivered to KLM in a containerized version. B737max does not have this option. For loading/unloading this makes a big difference for the ground staff performing this tasks. In view of Dutch or EU legislation this is not to be underestimated.
Boeing is a classic example of what happens to a company when the bean counters assume the power, in this case, instead of design and engineering calling the shots. Hunger for short term gain overlooks the potential for long term pain. The MAX is not the only problem in the Boeing camp. The 787 line in Alabama is also suffering quality issues. I wouldn't be surprised if KL eventually replaces their 78-9 fleet with A350s.
@@AndrewLarson-mq7xc The only way that will happen is if their corporate culture undergoes a massive change and wrests power from the accountants. How many "overnights" do you believe that will take?
Boeing has neglected to design a new aircraft and has always added new parts to the 737, which originally dates from 1967, until they were left with an outdated aircraft to which no more parts could be added. All this to please the shareholder, because developing a new aircraft costs a lot of money, and now, they have been sideways passed by Airbus, who are bringing a new aircraft. So the shareholders are shooting in their own foot.
KLM's decision to unify its fleet with the A321Neo aligns with the Air France-KLM Group's strategy to streamline operations. This move will likely bring significant cost savings.
Wise decision, Airbus currently makes/supplies a better and more reliable aircraft with better performance on noise/kerosene use and a more spacious seat layout.💪🏼
With the delays to the Max 10’s certification makes sense. Also, let’s be fair the Max is a bit of a disaster! Better be safe this time and stick to Airbus until Boeing can get it’s house in order.
calling the Max a disaster in 2024 is pretty wild, also what happened to that A350 again which was supposed to be "uncrashable" stated by Airbus? seems Boeing isnt the only company to lie
Sorry, but it is a disaster, if anyone can’t see that they are deluded. Boeing are killing people with a poor company culture and shabby manufacturing practices. I am no Airbus fanboy. At the end of the day Boeing used to make great products. They have lost their way. Airbus have made their mistakes that’s true, but nothing on Boeing’s scale. The max has proven to be dangerous several times. It’s a flying coffin.
[9:49] 'The worlds leading aircraft manufacturer'. This would be Boeing, right? Is this still the case? What is 'leading'? The company that sets the pace for the market? That would likely be Airbus with them bringing to market the most new or improved types in the last decade. Or does leading refer to the technological advancement? In that case Boeing is also behind, with Airbus using more efficient designs and high cockpit similarity between wildly diverse types. I guess the American dream of Boeing being a leader in a relative commodity market of passenger aircraft has come down like a lead zeppelin in the last decade. They seem unable to bring new designs to market, cut corners on production and engineering quality. That is not the attitude an industry leader is required to have.
"If it's Boeing, I'm not going". That's all about it. Good decision from KLM!
✈️✈️✈️
The NG 737 were very safe and capable aircraft’s, max has some problems tho. So I’m happy with the choose that KLM made.
KLM’s decision to adopt the A321neo reflects broader trends in the aviation industry. It’s great to see airlines investing in newer, more efficient aircraft.
The higher capacity of the A321neo should help KLM accommodate more passengers and improve profitability on busy routes.
thanks
Boeing should have just marketed an exclusive model for KLM - the 737 - MAX - Verstappen. They would have definitely filled the order books with that
HA! nice
KLM’s switch to the A321Neo is a smart move given the issues with the older B737 fleet.
thank for your comment
any old aircraft will have issues such as old airframe etc, the reason the A320 has less crashes is because the 737 came out in late 60's, a year where commercial jet aviation was new. compared to the A320 1984 which came in a time where aviation was more advanced.
@@OfficialDoggyYT Not really.
A320 are much safer planes because they’re modern redundant fly by wire machines with many software protections since the first day they were introduced back in the late 80s.
A Max is still the old cables and pulleys concept. It’s the oldest tech aircraft Boeing still produces, it doesn’t even feature a EICAS, something even 757 and 767 already have.
Except for the Max (because MCAS), 737s are good reliable planes, but they’re like a good vehicle from the 70s restored with more modern and efficient engines.
@@miks564 exactly what I said, the A320 came out in a time where commercial jet aviation was somewhat new, the technological advanced etc, you just proved my point. If it was the other way around you can bet the A320 would have more crashes
This move by KLM to the A321Neo is a win for passengers too - more comfort and better service on flights!
Thanks for sharing your thoughts!
The transition from the 737 to the A321Neo is huge for KLM. Can't wait to see these new planes in action!
Thanks.
The detailed breakdown of KLMs transition plan was very informative. This decision seems well thought out.
Standardizing the fleet across the Air France-KLM Group makes a lot of sense for operational efficiency.
thank for your feedback
The fuel efficiency of the A321Neo is a huge advantage for KLM. Great decision!
KLM moving to airbus with the NEO is the perfect choice. 🇳🇱
thanks for feedback
Can’t wait to see the A321Neo in KLM colors!
You did in the video unless you mean with your own eyes and not a video 😅
Is it beautiful right?
The instability with the B737 Max definitely pushed KLM towards Airbus.
thanks for your comment
Flying is an acceptable risk, but flying with Boeing means pushing the limits of what is acceptable.
Passenger comfort, safety and sense of security should not be underestimated. With Boeing that is long gone.
I'm glad KLM chose the A321Neo. It’s a more environmentally friendly option and will save them money in the long run.
It’s interesting how the Boeing 737 Max issues pushed KLM towards Airbus. Sometimes competition benefits everyone.
true
The environmental benefits of the A321Neo align well with KLM’s sustainability goals.
thank for your comment
The transition plan for KLM’s new fleet seems well thought out and strategic.
thanks for your comment
it doesnt seem well thought out neither is it strategic especially because of the airline itself which is mainly Boeing based
Is Airbus a321 neo right for KLM? Absolutely!
thanks
KLM’s switch to the A321neo makes a lot of sense given the fuel efficiency and environmental benefits. Excited to see how this impacts their operations!
KLM’s transition plan seems well thought out. Phasing out older 737s while integrating new A321neos will help ensure a smooth transition.
Not to forget that the Airbus planes (except the 220 which probably will be overhaled soon) can be flown with minimal training on each type.
That is waht Boing tried to do with the MCA sor their 737 and the new Max planes.
They failed to do it successfully because tey were to cheap and did not do it properly.
People died due to this.
I would not fly a Boeing for the foreseeable future-except the 747.
That is so old, it has matured enough to work.
The A321Neo’s range and performance make it a perfect fit for KLM’s European routes.
thank for your feedback
The flexibility and performance of the A321Neo make it a versatile aircraft for KLM's diverse route network. A well-thought-out decision!
Thanks for your comment
As a fan of aviation, I'm excited to see KLM embracing the A321Neo. This aircraft has a lot to offer in terms of efficiency, range, and passenger comfort.
Thanks for your comment
... and safety.
With the A321neo’s extended range, KLM will be able to explore new routes and offer better connectivity. This is a smart move for their fleet strategy.
It’s interesting to see KLM shift towards Airbus after so many years with Boeing. The A321neo’s advantages make it a compelling choice.
KLM’s decision to move away from Boeing shows how competitive the aviation industry is.
thanks for sharing
KLM's decision to move away from Boeing shows what for L they are.* Moving away from a company you have been working with ever since 1920 is a backstab.
Excited to see how the A321Neo will enhance KLM’s operations and passenger experience
same here
KLM’s switch to the A321 Neo could be a game-changer for the airline. Excited to see how it impacts their operations.
cant wait to see new airplane
Wow, KLM switching from the B737 to the A321Neo is a big move! Curious to see how this will affect their operations.
thanks for your feedback
I really love to see KLM airplanes, their light blue livery looks SO GOOD! It’s one of the best !
Thanks for your comment
Fuel efficiency and lower operating costs make the A321Neo a smart choice. Good move, KLM!
thanks for your feedback
On a neo last year(2023) to Pathos, Cyprus; lovely flight!
The A321neo’s improved capacity and noise reduction features are impressive. KLM’s passengers will likely appreciate the more comfortable and quieter flights.
do you like A321Neo?
I think you have to redo your homework. 😉
Pieter Elbers left KLM in june 2022 and nowadays he is the ceo of Indigo.
many thanks for your feedback
KLM's shift to the A321Neo shows their commitment to efficiency and sustainability. It's great to see airlines making choices that benefit both their operations and the environment!
For long time i may say i am fan of Boeing, but since the problems that Boeing cannot solve and the good developments at Airbus i can no longer say that. Also, support your local, and together with Air France, KLM has a great deal for the choice to switch over. Transavia also did a great job to switch over to the Neo's. Thumbs up for both. Wish them both many safe flight hours.
thanks so much for sharing
can you explain how and when did Transavia switch from Boeing 737s to the A321 Neos??
@@Advancedkid Transavia has received its first 321 Neo last november, the phasing out will take a while, but the proces is going on right now.
A321 is the all around best jet out there. it's not a wide body jumbo, but has good capacity, great range, fuel efficiency, and quiet. can't compare
KLM's fleet upgrade to the A321Neo reflects the evolving needs of the aviation industry. Modern, efficient aircraft are the way forward.
KLM embracing the A321Neo is a bold move. The increased range and capacity will definitely enhance their network.
Thanks for your sharing✈
As a frequent KLM flyer, I'm excited to experience the A321Neo. I’ve heard great things about its performance.
thanks for your sharing
Its fascinating to see KLM transition from Boeing to Airbus. The A321 Neo’s advantages are clearly compelling!
Come on, right now you gotta be really confident to fly new Boeing planes given all that has spilled out of their backyard. I certainly avoid the MAX and will keep doing that for many years. The fact that the producer basically lied to the operators and the authorities is brutal and reduces to zero the confidence. The NEO has simply bigger+more efficient engines, and for a few generations this has been enough to compel operators to new planes, since fuel is their biggest spending. The NEO with its fuel efficiency is like a Small Dreamliner or A350, very suitable to long point to point routes.
Airbus Rocked ♥️🔥 Boeing Shocked 💀☠️
KLM switching to the A321Neo is a smart move. The fuel efficiency and modern features are unbeatable!
Yes.
The broader strategy of fleet standardization makes a lot of sense.
✈
The transition to a more environmentally friendly fleet is a smart move by KLM.
✈
they also are a bit forced to do so. Government is partly stakeholder who has also their own agenda on emissions etc.
The issues with the older B737 fleet make this decision understandable.
The A321Neo is a great choice for KLM. I'm excited to see how this impacts their operations and passenger experience.
🛩🛩
The decision to move away from the 737 to the A321neo shows KLM’s commitment to modernizing its fleet. Great choice for reducing costs and improving performance.
yep
KLM’s move to A321Neo shows how airlines need to adapt to stay competitive and environmentally friendly.
thanks for your feedback
KLM always strives for the best, and switching to the A321Neo proves they’re committed to innovation and efficiency.
thanks for your feedback
Did he end this clip with saying that boeing is the world leading manufacturer for airplanes? I think that is history.
it was
The environmental impact of older aircraft can't be ignored. KLM's choice to go with the more eco-friendly A321Neo is commendable.
Thanks for your comment
KLM's decision to switch to the A321Neo highlights the ongoing issues with the 737. Airbus is definitely gaining ground!
✈✈
Sad to see the B737 go, but it’s clear the A321Neo offers a lot of advantages. Can’t wait to see these planes in action.
thanks for your feedback
KLM’s decision shows the industry’s shift towards newer, more efficient aircraft.
✈✈
This is just text to AI speech isn't it. Sounds super unnatural.
KLM used to be pretty loyal to Boeing. I think they are no longer feeling that way.
yes
KLM were Douglas customers WAY before Boeing. I believe they had nearly every model that Douglas and then McDonnell Douglas made, When boeing took MD Over, they went with Boeing, however, have had had Airbus before
@@adrianbriggs2763 it doesn't change anything for me. I've always liked KLM and I'm sure I will continue to like them.
With the A320/a321 NEO, Airbus surpassed Boeing in the most attractive category of aircraft and ascended to the top of the aviation industry.
✈✈
227 seats in A321? Come on Klm... You are not a low cost...
The A321 Neo’s fuel efficiency and range are impressive. KLM is making a smart move for the future.
do you wanna fly on it?
The analysis of the Boeing 737s issues was insightful. KLMs decision makes sense given the circumstances.
thanks
The transition from the B737 to the A321Neo is a smart move by KLM. The A321Neo's fuel efficiency is a game-changer in reducing operating costs.
Thanks for your comment
It's also fair to add that Boeing has been forced into slowing down it's operations by the FAA who unsurprisingly wants to keep a closer eye on how the American company goes about their business and so Boeing aren't able to fulfill their orders as quickly.
The knock-on effect of this is that some airlines will look elsewhere.
KLM has already bought several Embraer airliners and are currently replacing their 737s with a321neo as you have touched on.
They have also ordered several a350 to replace their Dreamliners but delivery isn't until 2026 for these long-haul airliners.
thanks for comment
The A321Neo’s performance and range are impressive.
thanks for comment
The A321Neo's quieter engines and increased passenger capacity are major advantages for KLM. Passengers will definitely appreciate the improved experience.
that's right
@@FLIGAVIA Flew with TAP on 330 and 321, and i was surprised by this aircraft. (had to book extra legroom tho). Was quiet, could have a solid rest on a long haul flight. With KLM's friendly staff i possibly would choose for them. And sometimes you can have really good deals with KLM, even tho they are mostly a bit on the high price. But you get what you pay for... KLM is solid good.
The statement that KLM could be an all Boeing-company is factually incorrect. For shorthaul KLM has heavily invested in Embraers. So, KLM always kept their options open.
thanks for your comment✈️✈️✈️
That’s KLM Cityhopper which for years always flew Fokker aircraft.
@@jamesbartlett5640 Still KLM, no matter how you spin it.
Had a friend who lived in the Amsterdam neighbourhood of Buitenveldert, some 600 meters from the descending planes using the socalled Buitenveldertbaan, runway 09/27. godawful noise even at 600 meters distance and especially so in the early morning.
Noise reduction for Schipho; is a major thing for the people of the region even if it is not so much a commercial driver like using less fuel or flying farther with the same amount or transport more for the same amount of fuel.
And without the annoying "BOOM" from time to time...
Yes I also live in the Netherlands and everytime I fly from Schiphol i hear the Boeingplanes make so fucking much noise yeah can hear the everywhere in the airport sometimes also silently in the bathrooms
@@RealMashexactly
Why does the Transavia new a321neo have winglets but klm don't i mean winglets causes the aircraft to have less turbulence right?
Best engine bolted to the finest aircraft in its segment. Easy choice
All is perfect ✈️✈️
The A321Neo’s reduced noise and increased range are great benefits. KLM passengers will appreciate these upgrades.
thanks for your comment
And let’s also not forget the aspect that Schiphol is requiring reduced noise levels from airlines to resolve or at least accommodate long lasting complaints about too high noise levels from people living in the vicinity of Schiphol Airport. As due to the expansions over the years -both of Schiphol and of the built up / housing areas surrounding the airport- noise pollution had become and still remains to be an also politically sensitive issue.
KLM’s focus on fuel efficiency with the A321neo aligns with current industry trends towards sustainability. This move could set an example for other airlines.
The LR version has better leg room with is awsome. Some of my best flying experiences
It's interesting to see KLM move away from the 737. The A321Neo must have some serious advantages!
Thanks for your comment.
I’m not suprised if they switch from the 787 family to the A350-900
They already have ruclips.net/video/36tPQN38U7E/видео.html
Airbus 320 Neo And Airbus 321 NEO are more quite I heard.😊
thanks for your feedback
Sign of the times , Boeing current issues started many years ago , I just watched a TV aircraft investigation involving Boeing complacency many years ago . Boeing could fold as an aircraft manufacturer I believe. They have themselves to blame . Boeing using an updated aircraft based on the old 737 , they can not complete with airbus , providing new and better aircraft . If it a Boeing I am not going , if I flying Boeing I may end up going ! Reputation is vital for survival in the airline industry.
thanks for sharing
Well done KLM! One more reason to keep on flying with the dutch carrier. If even the 787 were phased out it would be even better!
thanks for comment
average Airbus fanboy
@@OfficialDoggyYT You? As a former Boeing pilot I wouldn't trust my former beloved brand anymore
It’s interesting to see how the instability of the B737 Max influenced KLM’s fleet change.
many thanks for your comment
It is an Air France decision! KLM has no influence in this decision. AirFrance/KLM the most expensive price for an outdated interior and service! Bye-bye KLM...never fly again with the most arrogant personal they have!
@@Marcel20658 And that impacts the choice of plane...how?
@@RealMash Meaning? I was talking about KLM/Airfrance overall!
Since june 2022 Pieter Elbers is no longer CEO of KLM
thanks for your comment
The A321Neo offers better range and capacity, making it an ideal choice for KLM's European routes. This will undoubtedly enhance their service.
That's right
Verstandige beslissing. Geef aan een Boeing nog niet mijn oude schoenen mee.
Thanks for you comment
Plus the engines can't run in synthetic aviation fuel SAF. It's main Dutch hub wants to cut flights but not passengers, so "bigger" planes need to be ordered now for definite delivery while cutting costs so that a bigger seat capacity plane can run with less passengers at the same profit margin. It may also be an indication that Airbus pilots are "easier" to recruit. Mostly is frustrated Boeing has as this will add to KLMs cost in having two fleet types even if the 787 would be less efficient on paper
You have shared good information, thanks
I am surprised that you do not mention the fact that the Airbus A321 neo is delivered to KLM in a containerized version. B737max does not have this option. For loading/unloading this makes a big difference for the ground staff performing this tasks. In view of Dutch or EU legislation this is not to be underestimated.
nice, thanks for sharing
Boeing is a classic example of what happens to a company when the bean counters assume the power, in this case, instead of design and engineering calling the shots. Hunger for short term gain overlooks the potential for long term pain. The MAX is not the only problem in the Boeing camp. The 787 line in Alabama is also suffering quality issues. I wouldn't be surprised if KL eventually replaces their 78-9 fleet with A350s.
thanks for your comment ✈️
Boeing will get there crap back together it didn't happen overnight won't be fixed overnight
@@AndrewLarson-mq7xc The only way that will happen is if their corporate culture undergoes a massive change and wrests power from the accountants. How many "overnights" do you believe that will take?
@@alradioguy2269 got to have accountants can't get buy without them if people want a paycheck every 2 weeks.
@@AndrewLarson-mq7xc It shouldn't have happened in the first place. How many more will be subjected to peril until they get THEIR crap back?
Boeing has neglected to design a new aircraft and has always added new parts to the 737, which originally dates from 1967, until they were left with an outdated aircraft to which no more parts could be added. All this to please the shareholder, because developing a new aircraft costs a lot of money, and now, they have been sideways passed by Airbus, who are bringing a new aircraft. So the shareholders are shooting in their own foot.
true
Boeing needs to step up if they want to retain big clients like KLM.
thanks for your comment
Airbus 321 NEO is far efficient than the Boeing competition
✈✈
KLM's decision to unify its fleet with the A321Neo aligns with the Air France-KLM Group's strategy to streamline operations. This move will likely bring significant cost savings.
The A321Neo’s range and capacity are impressive. KLM is making a forward-thinking decision here.
thanks
Out of context hut finally someone that gives credits to the clips in the video
thanks for your feedback, we always do that
@@FLIGAVIA nice vid btw
Good call.... Boeings are crap these days
Thanks for sharing your thoughts
Wise decision, Airbus currently makes/supplies a better and more reliable aircraft with better performance on noise/kerosene use and a more spacious seat layout.💪🏼
🛫🛫
God bless Airbus
they made the right choice, Boeing is making to many mistakes lately, they promise but cant deliver
I hope that Boeing will one day make a new modern and safe aircraft to replace the old-fashioned 737.
We all love Boeing airplanes.
Yeah that would be great
No, no, not everyone loves Boeing.
Maybe I am stupid, but Pieter Elbers wasn't CEO when this decision was made? I believe Elbers left KLM mid 2022...
Decision was made in December 2021. Elbers was still CEO.
With the delays to the Max 10’s certification makes sense. Also, let’s be fair the Max is a bit of a disaster! Better be safe this time and stick to Airbus until Boeing can get it’s house in order.
✈️✈️✈️
calling the Max a disaster in 2024 is pretty wild, also what happened to that A350 again which was supposed to be "uncrashable" stated by Airbus? seems Boeing isnt the only company to lie
Sorry, but it is a disaster, if anyone can’t see that they are deluded. Boeing are killing people with a poor company culture and shabby manufacturing practices. I am no Airbus fanboy. At the end of the day Boeing used to make great products. They have lost their way. Airbus have made their mistakes that’s true, but nothing on Boeing’s scale. The max has proven to be dangerous several times. It’s a flying coffin.
[9:49] 'The worlds leading aircraft manufacturer'. This would be Boeing, right? Is this still the case? What is 'leading'? The company that sets the pace for the market? That would likely be Airbus with them bringing to market the most new or improved types in the last decade. Or does leading refer to the technological advancement? In that case Boeing is also behind, with Airbus using more efficient designs and high cockpit similarity between wildly diverse types.
I guess the American dream of Boeing being a leader in a relative commodity market of passenger aircraft has come down like a lead zeppelin in the last decade. They seem unable to bring new designs to market, cut corners on production and engineering quality. That is not the attitude an industry leader is required to have.