This will always be a subjective thing and there is no clear winner as I feel both sims do some nice stuff in terms of visuals and sound. Let me know your opinions!
The main people forget that when ACC was released it was full of bugs, when it was ported to console, it was just down right unplayable.we are comparing a game that’s new to the scene vs 1 that has had a plethora of updates over the last 5 year to get it where it is today. I race both, love both, but for different reasons.
@ ACC is on console, regardless of if you believe it should or should not be, that’s a fact, and the fact that people play it show it does matter and they do care. A lot of console owners are also tentatively awaiting to see if Motorsport games get the investment they require to port over to console, and also awaiting info on when AC EVO will be ported over after its early access implementation. So your comment is invalid I’m afraid as there is a market for sim racing on console.
@@robsexton5670 you know how many games are not ported to console or to pc from console or vice verse, the issues u named about ACC are completely invalid in a straight comparison with LMU
I have played both a lot, and in my opinion, ACC has more pros than cons and LMU has way more cons than pros (as of right now) I have faith that LMU will improve in the future though. Keep in mind it's still in early access. Additionally, I have noticed that fanboys of LMU are extremely toxic and quite possibly the most toxic of any sim. When you say any criticism of any other sim they take it rather well actually, but fanboys of LMU act like you murdered their family member if you find even one slight thing you don't like about it. Just saying.
I just wanted to say that your Videos are Great. The Hypercar guides (which are my favs) the POV videos or the comparisons. It´s always great when you upload and please keep producing such great Content. Greetings from Germany. EDIT: Can you please make track guides for tracks like COTA or Interlagos. I want to drive there so badly but it´s difficult to get around
You smoking something else. LMU has a washed out look and there's no animation on the hands when changing gears. Shows you how well ACC was done. Pity it's in UE.
@ConvexRook LMU is rfactor2 with reskin, with other words a 7 year old game made to look better. ACC is 5 year old game. Theoretically ACC is supposed to be better and in most areas it is. LMU lovers just runs for it because they are bored with ACC and other sims, just looking for new things all the time to please their ADHD stress in life 😅
@@snippidippiI mean, it's obviously an enhanced RF2... like any other ongoing game engine is advanced. AMS2 are advancing the madness engine. While LMU may not have all the flash, it does very well.
Both look amazing. Enjoy both I love love the exhaust sound in lmu from behind like on the bmw lol. Those downshifts are nice af. I also do love how i can see the texture on the track when in motion on lmu still.
never got into ACC but from what I usually watch the cab sounds are amazing with all the rattling although I am a fan of those exhaust sounds you hear in lmu
Looking at the comments doesn’t seem like many LMU fans. Everyone thoughts and opinions are valid. Seemingly ACC is a final product and LMU has some wiggle room to grow I think more people are looking at the potential of what LMU can be. I do enjoy the sound and how grit ACC is compared to LMU. If I had to choose one I think I would go with LMU with the potential (gamble) of what it could be. 😅 If it tanks guess what we have ACC to fall back on. lol
Acc was my main sim when i got into sim racing, had tons of fun on it also via LFM. But time has caught up with it, for me LMU beats its on all parameters… But both is very fun indeed
Yeah ACC was the first sim I played when I built my rig, I really wanted to play it in VR back then but it was really performance heavy so the graphics has to be low
Visually, LMU looks really smooth and the graphics is a lot more realistic IMO. But I prefer the FFB in ACC. LMU gt3 cars feel more stable, especially under braking and when colliding with other cars. But it comes down to preference, ACC is good, LMU has the potential to take over ACC.
@ I mean that I have no joy in driving acc anymore. Yeah it looks good and audio is good but nah after LMU’s recent update I won’t be playing acc again
@@GregBrock-s2y yeah thats fair enough, like i said it'll always be a subjective thing some people will gravitate towards one or the other for whatever their reasons
I keep trying LMU, I keep going back to ACC. The driving dynamics feels so much more precise. I'm trying to like LMU I just don't feel it. Plus no LFM.
@@rkwjunior2298the online ranking in LMU is fire. The cars are very intuitive to drive in LMU, they just don’t have the same wieghtiness that ACC cars have which feels so good. If we could combine the 2 that’d be the dream 😂
A reminder is that the LMGT3s have less torque and are generally slower than the GT3s in the GTWC, so if the times with the same cars do not match that is the reason.
Everyone has a different opinion, some people say LMU is most realistic others say ACC is most realistic. Some hate the ffb in lmu and some love the ffb in lmu. It seems that it’s entirely down to the individual no matter if it’s a pro GT3 driver or an amateur.
Yeah I agree, there are some aspects of the visuals in ACC that I like in ACC compared to LMU like the sunrise etc, everyone has their own taste which influences their decsion
i think ACC is better right now, but give LMU like 2 more years and it could be the successor to ACC. And you also have hypercars and prototypes as well.
IDK. I tried lmu and can't feel the car at all. Feels like I'm driving air. Acc I can feel understeer and over steer much more precisely. The car has weight to it. I tried to oversteer the mclaren in LMU and it was hard to do. Thats Arcade to me. I also had no sense of speed. I tried adjusting FOV.
@rkwjunior2298 sounds like you drove a totally different sim, i can feel the slide and i can control the car so effortlessly. I guess it comes down to how you drive the car.
@V-Racing I literally tried to make it oversteer. Applied full throttle coming out of corners way earlier than I should, while quickly turning in and it holds. Lol Completely unnatural. If I do the same in ACC I'm spinning like a top. And that's real
@@rkwjunior2298 Sorry, but that is a firm no. People spin all the time in LMU. ACC has excellent physics as well. They are just different sims. You are used to one and assume it is the yardstick, the closest thing to reality. But it probably isn't. All sims have different interpretations of what the real thing does. Just drive in LMU for 10-20 hours in a row without driving anything else and try again. James Baldwin says the LMU version is the closest to the real thing, so I am guessing he can't be completely wrong.
Yeah that’s fair enough mate, at the moment iracing probably has the best representation of rain driving in simulators, although it definitely has its own flaws. That’s the great thing about sim racing isn’t it, everyone does something good
I dont like the comparison. Not because it is good or bad. I just think you should play whatever the fuck you like and dont let any fanboys tell you otherwise
@@Very_Grumpy_Cat that’s the thing though where at any point is it telling you which one should you play? Theres nothing wrong with putting two different games together to see what they do similar/differently with audio and visuals.
@alexkayracing yes of course, there is nothing wrong with comparing the two games. The thing I just do not like is that some people can get too personal with their arguments if you know what I mean. Maybe it is not so much the comperinsion it self I do not like, more like that it is these videos people are like "this is better then that and so on" I do not like. My first comment was not criticism. Sorry for bad English. It is my second language
@ all good bro, I think the key here is like you said. People get way too “tribal” and aggressive, like it’s not allowed to play more than one sim or something. I agree that attitude needs to go
@khodges2 I don't really think ACC needs to update their graphics lol 😆 sure LMU looks better, but they shouldn't update their graphics just because LMU beats them in that. If any sim right now needs a graphics update it's iRacing.
I really wanted to like LMU coming from ACC. The graphics on LMU are too sharp and the colour balance is all wrong, some of the colours are really vibrant and then others are washed out. I also think the sounds in ACC offer you an immersive feeling of being behind a machine where’s in LMU it’s just a bit droney, especially in the McLaren, the Ferrari sounds better though as in ACC I always hated the sound of that car. Overall I thought LMU being a newer title would bring something bigger to the table but I was underwhelmed.
That’s fair enough, what’s your thoughts on the comparison between the two BMW’s? For me they definitely managed to make it sound better in LMU both inside and outside. For the McLaren I feel like the inside sounds a bit better in ACC, but I like the outside sound of it better in LMU
@alexkayracing Honestly, I’m not that bothered about the external sounds. In LMU I thought they did a really good job. I think James Baldwin said the internal sounds will eventually be patched as they have an issue with frequency. The two cars I don’t like driving due to the noises in ACC funny enough are the BMW and Ferrari. What ACC does really well for me is that raw noise of the gearbox, grit and dirt hitting the car. I thought by picking up LMU I would have been transported into the next era of GT3 immersion but realistically it’s just not that for me, hopefully in the future I’m wrong as I’m all for new games coming out and taking things up a notch! I understand things are missing as it’s in open beta, I think someone else eluded to the animations and so on not being in place like ACC and other titles. I’m prepared to cut them some slack on that but I just don’t think the fundamentals are that much better if at all. Do you think with the current state of the game they get people away from other titles like ACC or do you think after the RUclips hype people will fall back to their preferred sims? I’m interested as I’d rather drop hours in the next best thing.
@@dogamez8783 I think it will come down to the driving feel at the end of the day, if people like that ABS feeling they will stay with LMU. For me personally I love the game as I love driving the hypercars, and LMU definitely has the best version of hypercars in any simulator in my opinion
@@alexkayracing In all fairness I only wanted to drive the GT Cars coming from ACC and from watching your other video maybe I was wrong about the sounds, it seems maybe it’s McLaren thats just off pitch. Love your passion for the game! I might jump back in and see what I think and maybe get in some hypercars, inevitably get taught some lessons in the braking zones 😂 Might take a look at a shader maybe to reduce the sharpening as I do find the visuals a little off for a game of this era 👍
Yes they are different cars, but visually and sound wise they are more or less the same. Visually the LMGT3 have a different aero and different tires. Performance wise the GT world GT3 have more downforce than the LMGT3
In my opinion, the weight reduction is much better in ACC, although in LMU the tire deformation is done much better. I don't think either sim has the braking just right though, obviously ACC's braking is unrealistic as if you look at the telemetry of most laps in ACC, drivers tend to just stomp on the brakes mindlessly at every braking zone so it's a no brainer that the braking on ACC is quite unrealistic, but in LMU they make it too easy to lock up the brakes compared to RaceRoom, iRacing, AMS 2, etc. Even James Baldwin who is a real world racecar driver thinks it's too easy to lock up the brakes in LMU. So both sims have bad braking just for opposite reasons.
There are differences in aero package and some pace differences yes. But it’s nice to put them side by side and see if there’s similarities in engine sound/visual body work etc
They still have the same sound and shape. The point of the video is to show the sound and visual difference between the two, your comment makes no scenes.
You are missing out on a great experience because of a silly principle. It is early access because they had no choice. it was either that or no LMU. What would you prefer? Also, the experience is already more polished than some 1.0 releases. e.g EA WRC, F1 23, F124, MSFS204... they were fully bugged upon release but its ok because its 1.0...ok... Sim racers behave as though we have a plethora of options. You might have 500-1000 dollars or more of equipment in your room that would be utterly inert without software. think about that.
That’s understandable, however I can say that the game definitely is in a fairly good state with good content at the moment, you wouldn’t regret giving it a try. Of course that’s completely up to you 👍
@@alexkayracing The real difference is made by the FF (the realism of curbs, surfaces, steering inputs, load transfer etcetc) which on AMS2 currently are the top in driving realism. Graphics are great in all games now IMHO
Lmu overall has better tracks and details, such as the flag panels on the side of the tracks and the fact that all the tracks are the latest versions. ACC has better modelled interiors, with moving parts such has harnesses and wipers. There are issues with LMU, for example in online races LMU uses the same race numbers for every car that has the same livery. So if another car is running the same livery as me the race number is going to be the same. That is absurd especially when watching the replay. Also LMU lacks pit stop animations, hopefully that will be added but, considering they are willing to make you pay for a subscription in an early access, that is completely unacceptable.
It would be really cool to see the pit crew jump on the bonnet and wipe down the hypercars windshield for sure! I believe it’s a requested feature for a while now
@@jairjanga385 ok - did you? because i did not. If you write such a comment - then write it till the end and tell the world the „ultimate truth!“. but you also should have ears from an audio engineer :D
@@Spandauer66 they are both the same car though, the main difference being being the aero package and tires used. There are differences in their speed as the SRO ones have more downforce, but the visuals and sound would be similar
@@alexkayracing they are NOT the same car. The basis is the same, but LMGT3 are slower than the GT3. LMGT3 have virtual energy that the GT3 does not have, which has to do with the BoP. The onboard sound of the LMGT3 in LMU is simply closer to the original. The McLaren doesn't scream like in ACC
@ my brother we are talking about visuals and sound not how the car functions lol. I literally said in my comment above that the LMGT3 and SRO GT3 have different aero packages and tires which gives them a different speed etc. That’s the point of this video to put the two together and compare the visuals and sound
This will always be a subjective thing and there is no clear winner as I feel both sims do some nice stuff in terms of visuals and sound. Let me know your opinions!
there is a winner, have some balls and say it
@ lol I don’t know mate they both do some really nice stuff
@@alexkayracing no balls
@@kolysion164 nice
@@kolysion164 grow up.
The main people forget that when ACC was released it was full of bugs, when it was ported to console, it was just down right unplayable.we are comparing a game that’s new to the scene vs 1 that has had a plethora of updates over the last 5 year to get it where it is today. I race both, love both, but for different reasons.
Yeah great point, excited to see how LMU further develops in the future
ACC is not a console game, nobody cares man
@ ACC is on console, regardless of if you believe it should or should not be, that’s a fact, and the fact that people play it show it does matter and they do care. A lot of console owners are also tentatively awaiting to see if Motorsport games get the investment they require to port over to console, and also awaiting info on when AC EVO will be ported over after its early access implementation. So your comment is invalid I’m afraid as there is a market for sim racing on console.
@@robsexton5670 you know how many games are not ported to console or to pc from console or vice verse, the issues u named about ACC are completely invalid in a straight comparison with LMU
I have played both a lot, and in my opinion, ACC has more pros than cons and LMU has way more cons than pros (as of right now)
I have faith that LMU will improve in the future though. Keep in mind it's still in early access.
Additionally, I have noticed that fanboys of LMU are extremely toxic and quite possibly the most toxic of any sim. When you say any criticism of any other sim they take it rather well actually, but fanboys of LMU act like you murdered their family member if you find even one slight thing you don't like about it. Just saying.
Unreal engine 4
@grocam3 ?
I just wanted to say that your Videos are Great. The Hypercar guides (which are my favs) the POV videos or the comparisons. It´s always great when you upload and please keep producing such great Content. Greetings from Germany. EDIT: Can you please make track guides for tracks like COTA or Interlagos. I want to drive there so badly but it´s difficult to get around
Thanks for you support bro and thank you for the kind words🙏 I will have a look at what I can do regarding the Interlagos and COTA tracks
LMU is much more realistic and natural looking to me, clear winner.
Nice! I feel that in night time personally the ambient lighting looks better in ACC. Was cool to see the lasers at COTA. What do you think?
You smoking something else. LMU has a washed out look and there's no animation on the hands when changing gears. Shows you how well ACC was done. Pity it's in UE.
@ConvexRook LMU is rfactor2 with reskin, with other words a 7 year old game made to look better. ACC is 5 year old game. Theoretically ACC is supposed to be better and in most areas it is. LMU lovers just runs for it because they are bored with ACC and other sims, just looking for new things all the time to please their ADHD stress in life 😅
@@snippidippiNo, LMU lovers play for its physic
@@snippidippiI mean, it's obviously an enhanced RF2... like any other ongoing game engine is advanced. AMS2 are advancing the madness engine. While LMU may not have all the flash, it does very well.
Both look amazing. Enjoy both I love love the exhaust sound in lmu from behind like on the bmw lol. Those downshifts are nice af. I also do love how i can see the texture on the track when in motion on lmu still.
Bro what about that rumble at the low gears when you trail brake in for the corner with the bmw! So good 🔥🔥
never got into ACC but from what I usually watch the cab sounds are amazing with all the rattling although I am a fan of those exhaust sounds you hear in lmu
Yeah the rocks hitting the body of the car etc are so cool! I love that exhaust sound from the LMU McLaren with the downshifts
Looking at the comments doesn’t seem like many LMU fans. Everyone thoughts and opinions are valid. Seemingly ACC is a final product and LMU has some wiggle room to grow I think more people are looking at the potential of what LMU can be. I do enjoy the sound and how grit ACC is compared to LMU. If I had to choose one I think I would go with LMU with the potential (gamble) of what it could be. 😅 If it tanks guess what we have ACC to fall back on. lol
They both do some nice things don’t they! That’s why it’s good to put the two together to see what the differences are. Thanks for watching mate 👍
you forgot to include the real life car videos :D we still dont know which is better bro! 😁
@old-simracing-rookie ahaha true I should have! I think the video was long enough though 😂
Acc was my main sim when i got into sim racing, had tons of fun on it also via LFM. But time has caught up with it, for me LMU beats its on all parameters… But both is very fun indeed
Yeah ACC was the first sim I played when I built my rig, I really wanted to play it in VR back then but it was really performance heavy so the graphics has to be low
Visually, LMU looks really smooth and the graphics is a lot more realistic IMO. But I prefer the FFB in ACC. LMU gt3 cars feel more stable, especially under braking and when colliding with other cars. But it comes down to preference, ACC is good, LMU has the potential to take over ACC.
Exactly and there’s nothing wrong with enjoying both !
I disagree. I cannot even think about opening ACC now so that’s now fine to me
Oh you mean you don’t think ACC does anything better in terms of visuals?
@ I mean that I have no joy in driving acc anymore. Yeah it looks good and audio is good but nah after LMU’s recent update I won’t be playing acc again
@@GregBrock-s2y yeah thats fair enough, like i said it'll always be a subjective thing some people will gravitate towards one or the other for whatever their reasons
I keep trying LMU, I keep going back to ACC.
The driving dynamics feels so much more precise.
I'm trying to like LMU I just don't feel it.
Plus no LFM.
@@rkwjunior2298the online ranking in LMU is fire. The cars are very intuitive to drive in LMU, they just don’t have the same wieghtiness that ACC cars have which feels so good. If we could combine the 2 that’d be the dream 😂
A reminder is that the LMGT3s have less torque and are generally slower than the GT3s in the GTWC, so if the times with the same cars do not match that is the reason.
Yep correct, different tires and aero as well. The GTWC GT3 have more downforce
Lmgt3's are probably quicker at le Mans, but slower everywhere else compared to aco ones
@Will-MakingSelfImprovementFun puede que no por la potencia reducida
@ ah yep cos they have less drag on the straights good point
ACC visually is definitelly better IMO
Okay fair enough, I like the sunrise in ACC how the light rays are kind of directed at a certain point
Everyone has a different opinion, some people say LMU is most realistic others say ACC is most realistic. Some hate the ffb in lmu and some love the ffb in lmu. It seems that it’s entirely down to the individual no matter if it’s a pro GT3 driver or an amateur.
Yeah I agree, there are some aspects of the visuals in ACC that I like in ACC compared to LMU like the sunrise etc, everyone has their own taste which influences their decsion
@ exactly, there’s no right or wrong. Even though everyone says there is 😂
@ I dunno bro some people just go crazy over the topic hey lol, we are allowed to enjoy both 😂
@@alexkayracing exactly 😂
i think ACC is better right now, but give LMU like 2 more years and it could be the successor to ACC. And you also have hypercars and prototypes as well.
Thanks for sharing!
the sounds are better in ACC, but the driving, graphics and ffb definitely goes to LMU
IDK. I tried lmu and can't feel the car at all. Feels like I'm driving air.
Acc I can feel understeer and over steer much more precisely. The car has weight to it. I tried to oversteer the mclaren in LMU and it was hard to do. Thats Arcade to me.
I also had no sense of speed. I tried adjusting FOV.
@rkwjunior2298 sounds like you drove a totally different sim, i can feel the slide and i can control the car so effortlessly. I guess it comes down to how you drive the car.
@V-Racing I literally tried to make it oversteer. Applied full throttle coming out of corners way earlier than I should, while quickly turning in and it holds. Lol
Completely unnatural.
If I do the same in ACC I'm spinning like a top. And that's real
the sound in ACC is absolutely unrealistic. Listen to the original McLaren
@@rkwjunior2298 Sorry, but that is a firm no. People spin all the time in LMU. ACC has excellent physics as well. They are just different sims. You are used to one and assume it is the yardstick, the closest thing to reality. But it probably isn't. All sims have different interpretations of what the real thing does. Just drive in LMU for 10-20 hours in a row without driving anything else and try again. James Baldwin says the LMU version is the closest to the real thing, so I am guessing he can't be completely wrong.
iRacing ha spoiled me in the rain... Watching these car in the rain staying on the racing line the entire lap is frustrating lol
Yeah that’s fair enough mate, at the moment iracing probably has the best representation of rain driving in simulators, although it definitely has its own flaws. That’s the great thing about sim racing isn’t it, everyone does something good
I dont like the comparison. Not because it is good or bad. I just think you should play whatever the fuck you like and dont let any fanboys tell you otherwise
@@Very_Grumpy_Cat that’s the thing though where at any point is it telling you which one should you play? Theres nothing wrong with putting two different games together to see what they do similar/differently with audio and visuals.
@alexkayracing yes of course, there is nothing wrong with comparing the two games. The thing I just do not like is that some people can get too personal with their arguments if you know what I mean. Maybe it is not so much the comperinsion it self I do not like, more like that it is these videos people are like "this is better then that and so on" I do not like.
My first comment was not criticism.
Sorry for bad English. It is my second language
@ all good bro, I think the key here is like you said. People get way too “tribal” and aggressive, like it’s not allowed to play more than one sim or something. I agree that attitude needs to go
Los dos excelentes 👌 va en gustos...para mi LMU me da mejor experiencia
Very nice bro! For me LMU feels better to drive
LMU obviously looks better. It’s a newer game. I don’t know if the sound is as accurate but it also sounds greats.
ACC needs a visual update.
It looks pretty good for a game made a fair few years ago at leasf
@khodges2 I don't really think ACC needs to update their graphics lol 😆 sure LMU looks better, but they shouldn't update their graphics just because LMU beats them in that. If any sim right now needs a graphics update it's iRacing.
The dashboard alone is worse in LMU. I can’t understand why all GT3s have the same font for the dash in LMU. That’s just lazy.
Also gear ratio in the M4 is just wrong, comparing it to onboard cameras in this WEC season.
@@tooeasy1100 the 4th and 5th gears are very long aren’t they 😂
I really wanted to like LMU coming from ACC. The graphics on LMU are too sharp and the colour balance is all wrong, some of the colours are really vibrant and then others are washed out.
I also think the sounds in ACC offer you an immersive feeling of being behind a machine where’s in LMU it’s just a bit droney, especially in the McLaren, the Ferrari sounds better though as in ACC I always hated the sound of that car.
Overall I thought LMU being a newer title would bring something bigger to the table but I was underwhelmed.
That’s fair enough, what’s your thoughts on the comparison between the two BMW’s? For me they definitely managed to make it sound better in LMU both inside and outside.
For the McLaren I feel like the inside sounds a bit better in ACC, but I like the outside sound of it better in LMU
@alexkayracing Honestly, I’m not that bothered about the external sounds. In LMU I thought they did a really good job.
I think James Baldwin said the internal sounds will eventually be patched as they have an issue with frequency.
The two cars I don’t like driving due to the noises in ACC funny enough are the BMW and Ferrari.
What ACC does really well for me is that raw noise of the gearbox, grit and dirt hitting the car.
I thought by picking up LMU I would have been transported into the next era of GT3 immersion but realistically it’s just not that for me, hopefully in the future I’m wrong as I’m all for new games coming out and taking things up a notch!
I understand things are missing as it’s in open beta, I think someone else eluded to the animations and so on not being in place like ACC and other titles. I’m prepared to cut them some slack on that but I just don’t think the fundamentals are that much better if at all.
Do you think with the current state of the game they get people away from other titles like ACC or do you think after the RUclips hype people will fall back to their preferred sims?
I’m interested as I’d rather drop hours in the next best thing.
@@dogamez8783 I think it will come down to the driving feel at the end of the day, if people like that ABS feeling they will stay with LMU.
For me personally I love the game as I love driving the hypercars, and LMU definitely has the best version of hypercars in any simulator in my opinion
@@alexkayracing In all fairness I only wanted to drive the GT Cars coming from ACC and from watching your other video maybe I was wrong about the sounds, it seems maybe it’s McLaren thats just off pitch.
Love your passion for the game! I might jump back in and see what I think and maybe get in some hypercars, inevitably get taught some lessons in the braking zones 😂
Might take a look at a shader maybe to reduce the sharpening as I do find the visuals a little off for a game of this era 👍
the super bright saturated colors of ACC often make it look cartoony
ACC looks better, more realistic and has more details. Sounds are comparable in both. Some details sound better in lmu others in acc.
Nice thanks for sharing!
just to be clear the GT WORLD GT3 and the LMGT3 are DIFFERENT cars they are NOT supposed to be the exact same
Yes they are different cars, but visually and sound wise they are more or less the same. Visually the LMGT3 have a different aero and different tires. Performance wise the GT world GT3 have more downforce than the LMGT3
also compare ams2
Not only visual the feeling when driving lmu much better
Nice!
In my opinion, the weight reduction is much better in ACC, although in LMU the tire deformation is done much better.
I don't think either sim has the braking just right though, obviously ACC's braking is unrealistic as if you look at the telemetry of most laps in ACC, drivers tend to just stomp on the brakes mindlessly at every braking zone so it's a no brainer that the braking on ACC is quite unrealistic, but in LMU they make it too easy to lock up the brakes compared to RaceRoom, iRacing, AMS 2, etc. Even James Baldwin who is a real world racecar driver thinks it's too easy to lock up the brakes in LMU. So both sims have bad braking just for opposite reasons.
Not same cars , in Lmu there are lmgt3 not gt3 , there will be differences
There are differences in aero package and some pace differences yes. But it’s nice to put them side by side and see if there’s similarities in engine sound/visual body work etc
They still have the same sound and shape. The point of the video is to show the sound and visual difference between the two, your comment makes no scenes.
Visuals go to ACC. The rest (sound, FFB) to LMU. I've put 3000hrs in ACC and I don't see myself going back. "muddy" FFB, meta setups killed acc.
That’s fair enough and look sometimes people just need a change as well! As long as you’re enjoying yourself that’s what matter
for players who wants to play in VR: LMU is awesome, ACC is bad.
Yeah the performance hit in VR is extremely taxing and looks blurry
Vs iracing next
Okay but you have to protect me when everyone wants to shoot me 😂
ACC hands down
Nice mate what’s your favourite car in ACC?
Apparently different FOVs.
@@rockerbauer yeah you have to zoom back a bit in ACC to see the wheel etc
LMU!
Nice bro 🔥
400 hours in ACC is great but LMU with the GT3s feels better especially the bracking (only GT3s of course)
LMU is doing great less content but is good
@@JorgeG-uw2wg yeah especially with that ABS feeling it’s really cool
LMU charging for DLC in early release. Putting the cart before the horse.
You are missing out on a great experience because of a silly principle. It is early access because they had no choice. it was either that or no LMU. What would you prefer? Also, the experience is already more polished than some 1.0 releases. e.g EA WRC, F1 23, F124, MSFS204... they were fully bugged upon release but its ok because its 1.0...ok... Sim racers behave as though we have a plethora of options. You might have 500-1000 dollars or more of equipment in your room that would be utterly inert without software. think about that.
That’s understandable, however I can say that the game definitely is in a fairly good state with good content at the moment, you wouldn’t regret giving it a try. Of course that’s completely up to you 👍
LMU is such an underrated game
@@daviddanser8011 it really deserves more support doesn’t it
The winner is AMS2 😅
I will have to do that comparison as well
@@alexkayracing The real difference is made by the FF (the realism of curbs, surfaces, steering inputs, load transfer etcetc) which on AMS2 currently are the top in driving realism. Graphics are great in all games now IMHO
Lmu overall has better tracks and details, such as the flag panels on the side of the tracks and the fact that all the tracks are the latest versions. ACC has better modelled interiors, with moving parts such has harnesses and wipers. There are issues with LMU, for example in online races LMU uses the same race numbers for every car that has the same livery. So if another car is running the same livery as me the race number is going to be the same. That is absurd especially when watching the replay. Also LMU lacks pit stop animations, hopefully that will be added but, considering they are willing to make you pay for a subscription in an early access, that is completely unacceptable.
It would be really cool to see the pit crew jump on the bonnet and wipe down the hypercars windshield for sure! I believe it’s a requested feature for a while now
Cockpit view : ACC 4/5 LMU : 2/5
lightning/shadows : ACC 4/5 LMU 4/5
car models : ACC 5/5 LMU 4/5
Sounds : ACC 3/5 LMU 5/5
Tracks : ACC 4/5 LMU 4/5
Pitstop : ACC 4/5 LMU 0/5
Liverys : ACC 5/5 LMU 3/5
Customization : ACC 3/5 LMU 0/5
ACC 4p
LMU 2.75p
Yeah i feel the same
🤣
If you only would know what you dont you wont not write any of that😂
@3231687 sorry LMU fanboy, just left my opinion what I feel about both game
:D opinion without knowing all info is a wrong opinion to start with....
ACC, ftw, imo
Fair enough bro, what makes you like it more?
When you have seen them in real life you know the more realistic sim if we are talking sounds
@@jairjanga385 for me personally i prefer LMU sounds although I’ve not heard those cards in real life apart from the AMG, Audi & Lamborghini GT3
@@jairjanga385 ok - did you? because i did not. If you write such a comment - then write it till the end and tell the world the „ultimate truth!“. but you also should have ears from an audio engineer :D
le mans è praticamente assetto corsa 1
With mod or no mod?
1.) the ACC sound is unrealistic 2.) ACC is a GT3 and LMU is a LMGT3
@@Spandauer66 they are both the same car though, the main difference being being the aero package and tires used.
There are differences in their speed as the SRO ones have more downforce, but the visuals and sound would be similar
@@alexkayracing they are NOT the same car. The basis is the same, but LMGT3 are slower than the GT3. LMGT3 have virtual energy that the GT3 does not have, which has to do with the BoP. The onboard sound of the LMGT3 in LMU is simply closer to the original. The McLaren doesn't scream like in ACC
@ my brother we are talking about visuals and sound not how the car functions lol. I literally said in my comment above that the LMGT3 and SRO GT3 have different aero packages and tires which gives them a different speed etc.
That’s the point of this video to put the two together and compare the visuals and sound
@@alexkayracing Bro ... I wrote that the sound of ACC GT3 is way too screechy and the sound of LMGT3 from LMU GT3 is much closer to the original ^^
@ sorry I didn’t see that one lol my bad. Yeah that’s fair enough
ACC is the biggest scam in simracing history this game sucks for ever
Oh Jesus 😂
useless video
I think it gives a nice side by side comparison for ACC and LMU graphics and sound, nothing useless about that
12:42 I just made the exact same sound! 😮😱🥸
Ahahaha 😂
ACC's sounds arent very good
Yeah for me in the sound department LMU wins most of the time 👍