🔥SNEAK PEEK - EMERALD PHYSICS EP4.7 SPEAKERS

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 18 окт 2024

Комментарии • 19

  • @MRMunnerlyn
    @MRMunnerlyn 6 месяцев назад +1

    I’ve got these same EP4.7s among many others. Would love to see a full review on them. So very little content available for these! Subbing just for this!

  • @NightShazz9000
    @NightShazz9000 8 месяцев назад +2

    Those speakers are a work of art! 😮😮😮

  • @riccitone
    @riccitone 8 месяцев назад +1

    Very cool setup! Yes, would be great to get your impressions on how the EP’s compare to your customer builds - albeit different animals 🙏🏼👍🏼

    • @abxaudiophiles
      @abxaudiophiles  8 месяцев назад +1

      Few days in, our ABX/LDA Baffles are far superior on almost all aspects of sound reproduction.

    • @riccitone
      @riccitone 8 месяцев назад +1

      @@abxaudiophiles I was suspecting as much. I’m going to venture into one of your amazing builds at some point 🙏🏼

  • @AllboroLCD
    @AllboroLCD 8 месяцев назад +1

    Very nice looking! My setup is similar but I have my PC and 32" monitor integrated to my rig. Near field listening on large scale speakers sounds so damn good!

  • @edholmwood
    @edholmwood 8 месяцев назад +1

    Nice system. Can't wait to see the final reviews. Thank you.

  • @dannyrichie9743
    @dannyrichie9743 8 месяцев назад +2

    Actually Clayton Shaw did not design that speaker. Clayton used to own that company. It was sold to Walter Lederman and that model was designed by a guy in Canada. It also measures like crap, and uses super cheesy parts, and sounds horrible. So I am sure Clayton would not like seeing his name attached to it.

    • @abxaudiophiles
      @abxaudiophiles  8 месяцев назад +1

      Good info! Thanks for the context. I assure you it doesn’t sound like crap, although everything sounds like crap to someone. They are a tad to forward and bright for my liking tho, and our ABX/LDA baffles destroy them on basically all fronts. 😊😊

    • @dannyrichie9743
      @dannyrichie9743 8 месяцев назад

      ​@@abxaudiophiles No offense, but if you are listening to them in that empty room then you haven't heard them. Not that you are missing much, but you are just hearing room reflections. They already have a frequency response that has a 10 to 12db range of variance with a lot of brightness in the top end. In that room, with zero room treatment and poor placement, they will have a smeared sound from the wall reflections, some out of phase cancellation, and some pretty big peaks. I bet the in room response has a variance of 15 to 20db.
      No speaker should ever be reviewed in an empty room like that, but an open baffle speaker especially needs to be further out from the wall, away from the corners, and they really need absorption and diffusion all across that front wall and side walls.

    • @abxaudiophiles
      @abxaudiophiles  8 месяцев назад +2

      Agreed in most cases. Low level, near field eliminates some things. But yea, we will move these down to the main room as well. All good buddy. Less rules. More listening 😊😊😊

  • @TriAmpHiFi
    @TriAmpHiFi 8 месяцев назад +1

    Less rules, more open discussion................
    I know I've been asking, but no one gives an in-sarcastic explanation. I would like to understand why people put their gear on a shelf 2 inches off the ground or on the ground & place gear right between the loudspeakers.
    Do turntables get less vibration between loudspeakers? Do micro-phonic tube amplifiers perform better next to woofers? Do amplifier manufacturers recommend gear should be stacked there? Does it make a better thumbnail for posting? What's the logic?
    Acid Jazz, Funk & Brass 🔈🔉🔊

    • @abxaudiophiles
      @abxaudiophiles  8 месяцев назад

      I think for most it’s just “do as I see”. Most people for convenience more than anything utilize the stereo center approach. Also depends on room I suppose really. Ideally you would want your equipment in whatever spot had the least resonance. But that’s not always ideal for many reasons, most based on looks and WAF…. Great topic for discussion.

  • @humanitech
    @humanitech 8 месяцев назад +1

    Interesting open baffle speaker design....but it gets a bit confusing! As some open baffles designs are just big square or oblong baffle boards... but the baffles on these speakers are more shaped to the upper driver? As I'm looking into doing a DIY speaker ...does one shape have more advantage than the other?

    • @abxaudiophiles
      @abxaudiophiles  8 месяцев назад

      Check out my other baffle videos for sure. 👍🏼. What I’ve found is the smaller the baffle can be the more cohesion and clarity you get in the soundstage, but at a sacrifice of the size and depth of the soundstage. And vice versa with a larger baffle. I much prefer my 2’ wide by 4’ high ABX/LDA baffles.