The 10,000 Domino Computer

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 3 апр 2014
  • Matt Parker and a team of Domino Computer Builders balanced over 10,000 dominoes in a carefully designed circuit. The result was a Domino Computer capable of automatically adding numbers. It can take any two four-digit binary numbers and return the five-digit binary sum.
    It's a computer, made of dominoes.
    Watch the Numberphile where Matt explains more of the maths: • Domino Addition - Numb...
    As well as the secret Numberphile bonus interview: • Dominoes Computer (ext...
    There are free worksheets and teaching resources about binary numbers and logic gates here:
    think-maths.co.uk/downloads/do...
    Computer design:
    Matt Parker, Katie Steckles, Paul Taylor, Andrew Taylor, Siân Fryer
    Builders:
    Ben Curtis, Becky Smedley, Mike Bell, Blair Lavelle, Andrew Pontzen, Jonathan Sanderson, Elin Roberts, Chris Roberts, Ben Ashforth, Gillian Kiernan, David Julyan
    Thanks to Marieke Navin, Natalie Ireland, Nicola Frost and everyone at the Museum of Science and Industry who made this possible. www.mosi.org.uk/
    Huge thanks to Jonathan Sanderson at StoryCog for making the video. storycog.com/
  • РазвлеченияРазвлечения

Комментарии • 2,5 тыс.

  • @alquinn8576
    @alquinn8576 7 лет назад +1865

    Q "what keeps you up at night?"
    A "exclusive or gates made of dominoes"

    • @Zaknaberrnon
      @Zaknaberrnon 7 лет назад +94

      #DominoGate

    • @aprx2980
      @aprx2980 7 лет назад +32

      There's something about that which makes me cringe a *bit.*

    • @aidan_lol1235
      @aidan_lol1235 7 лет назад +17

      Al Quinn it's more commonly known as the XOR gate

    • @DanielFoerster
      @DanielFoerster 7 лет назад +11

      +Aidan_lol 123 XOR is an abbreviation of eXclusive OR.

    • @nemesisurvivorleon
      @nemesisurvivorleon 3 года назад +4

      what will really keep you awake at night is knowing that politics is just a human XOR gate

  • @TrainTsarFun
    @TrainTsarFun 5 лет назад +736

    Love that “we did get the correct answer. We got an incorrect answer as well” lol!
    Very neat to see how this works.

  • @timlarkin4471
    @timlarkin4471 7 лет назад +305

    On the bright side, the kids got to see more dominoes fall.

  • @nicololupi49
    @nicololupi49 7 лет назад +1062

    i think that the operative system i's called "dominOS"

  • @marcgro4111
    @marcgro4111 8 лет назад +2878

    Have you tried turning it off and on again?

    • @heekoo4428
      @heekoo4428 8 лет назад +38

      Lol

    • @Dohyden2
      @Dohyden2 7 лет назад +78

      ''ok we just need to turn it off and on again, come back in 4 hours''

    • @jamesvogt4739
      @jamesvogt4739 6 лет назад +19

      It took 3 days to turn it on and off and it didn't work

    • @NacnudPinky
      @NacnudPinky 5 лет назад +1

      Marc Groß my dad says that all the time at work

    • @manuelf1181
      @manuelf1181 5 лет назад

      9

  • @R2D2internet
    @R2D2internet 8 лет назад +1019

    "This is the >>bit

    • @maxbuskirk5302
      @maxbuskirk5302 8 лет назад +34

      +ASG_8 Also, "I'm a bit worried because . . ."

    • @lokalnyork
      @lokalnyork 8 лет назад +42

      +ASG_8
      Math Jokes? I'll byte.

    • @fugazinemesis
      @fugazinemesis 8 лет назад +27

      +ASG_8 To 'sum' up, I think your comment is 'negative' to a 'positive', although 'divided', result. You've set off joke comments that are going 'multiply'. 'One' can not begin to 'factorise' the 'mean'ing of what's been done. I've 'add' enough of this 'rational'. The 'angle' is too 'odd'; 'obutse' 'even'. It would be 'beta' to 'googol' to the 'nth degree' some sort of 'volume' apology.

    • @christiandevey3898
      @christiandevey3898 8 лет назад +2

      I. Didn't catch that one

    • @bonbonpony
      @bonbonpony 8 лет назад +1

      +Local Ork Word up ;J

  • @Kengur8
    @Kengur8 7 лет назад +595

    Will we ever be able to go below 14 nm with this dominos process technology?

  • @hedgehog3180
    @hedgehog3180 7 лет назад +181

    I think this has made me understand how computers work. I could never understand how electricity could calculate anything. The trick is that they don't. It's just cleverly designed so that it will give the right answer to the input and then you scale it up and account for different types of input, but at the base all a computer is doing is adding and subtracting, which to a computer are really the same thing.

    • @MiniNinja2003
      @MiniNinja2003 7 лет назад +62

      Honestly, if you can make coding to add, then you could code it to multiply, and when you can multiply, you can basically do anything.
      You can think of a computer as a very big group of 1st graders answering a series of simple math questions.

    • @metallicman711
      @metallicman711 7 лет назад +26

      computers generally don't even have circuitry to subtract. they can use a thing called two's complement which allows them to subtract using only adding circuitry

    • @KnakuanaRka
      @KnakuanaRka 5 лет назад +16

      Josh S (Not for the guy I’m replying directly to) In case you’re wondering about two’s complement, the equivalent in ten digits is doing a subtraction like 9-6 by doing 9+(1000-6)=9+994=1003. This is 1000 too high, but if you only can read the last three digits, the extra 1000 “overflows” and is removed, leaving the correct answer of 3.

    • @JamesThompson-zu3bq
      @JamesThompson-zu3bq 7 месяцев назад

      @@KnakuanaRkahow does the computer know that 1000 - 6 is 994 if we don't have subtractive circuits?

    • @KnakuanaRka
      @KnakuanaRka 7 месяцев назад

      @@JamesThompson-zu3bq There’s something known as “two’s complement” in binary; basically, IIRC, a string of all ones (like 1111) is generally the maximum value you can hold in a binary number of a certain length, which is one less than 2^the number of digits. So if you flip all the bits in a number, you get something that sums with the original to get all ones/the maximum; if you then add one, you get something that’s 2^digits - the original number, without any explicit subtraction. It’s a little more complicated with signed numbers, but the execution is the same.
      The equivalent in base 10 would be like starting with a number like 006, using a lookup table to subtract each digit from 9 (switch 0-9, 1-8, 2-7, 3-6, 4-5) to get 993, and adding one to get 994.

  • @ComputersAreRealCool
    @ComputersAreRealCool 8 лет назад +866

    This computer is faster than the ones we have at school, and probably has more advanced technology in it as well.

    • @shadowranger937
      @shadowranger937 7 лет назад +7

      yep

    • @Firesite8514
      @Firesite8514 7 лет назад +2

      THE THING IS THAST PROBS TRUE

    • @charlieknapp6735
      @charlieknapp6735 7 лет назад +32

      I took the front off one of the computers at school. Inside was just a room full of dominoes...

    • @magnusanderson6681
      @magnusanderson6681 7 лет назад +15

      Charlie Knapp THIS IS WHAT THE GOVERNMENT USES DIMENSIONAL STORAGE FOR?

    • @permanentcloak1283
      @permanentcloak1283 7 лет назад +1

      Magnus Anderson this.

  • @Violent2aShadow
    @Violent2aShadow 8 лет назад +2509

    Can a domino computer become self-aware and destroy humanity?

    • @danieljiang9985
      @danieljiang9985 8 лет назад +189

      Only if it's big enough

    • @JohnnyYenn
      @JohnnyYenn 8 лет назад +79

      +Violent2aShadow
      That's what happens in the movie Transcendence. Johnny Depp uploads his brain to a super-powerful domino computer and threatens humanity...

    • @iyokan7979
      @iyokan7979 8 лет назад +146

      +Violent2aShadow Yes. But only once. Also, it takes 7 years.

    • @iyokan7979
      @iyokan7979 8 лет назад +42

      Abhinav Sharma That is completely plausible, just remember that it only works once.

    • @manooxi327
      @manooxi327 8 лет назад

      +Abhinav Sharma
      F4?

  • @finleycastello6512
    @finleycastello6512 7 лет назад +272

    *_I WOULD KILL FOR THAT PROCESSING SPEED ON MY COMPUTER!_*

    • @Johnyknowhow
      @Johnyknowhow 7 лет назад +6

      Multiple minutes to calculate simple digit addition? How slow IS your computer?

    • @Fizer005
      @Fizer005 7 лет назад +26

      so slow it took his pc 2 years to make that comment

    • @_.Dylan._
      @_.Dylan._ 7 лет назад +5

      T h a t s t h e j o k e

    • @genericcookiedoplay3911
      @genericcookiedoplay3911 7 лет назад

      Finley Castello are you Australian by any chance XD

    • @Xeridanus
      @Xeridanus 7 лет назад +7

      Hey, our computers are just as fast as elsewhere. It's the internet that's slow.

  • @davidbilia2371
    @davidbilia2371 7 лет назад +131

    Is that 1 domino that fell like electron migration if cpus get to compact

    • @ferociousfeind8538
      @ferociousfeind8538 7 лет назад +20

      David Bilia Yes! :)

    • @clancywiggum3198
      @clancywiggum3198 7 лет назад +28

      No, it's more analogous to quantum tunneling or other causes of current leaking of current between 2 adjacent circuits. Electron migration refers to movement of the *conductor* being driven around by the electrons, and is best understood as a type of wear and tear, where sections of conductor can get worn away as the atoms forming them get shoved to other areas by the electron flow.

    • @MrCmon113
      @MrCmon113 5 лет назад +4

      It's like induction due to insufficient isolation. Come to think of it, it's the very same scenario when you imagine such induction taking place right before a signal gets amplified.

  • @jfb-
    @jfb- 8 лет назад +700

    Almost worked - classic Parker Square that is

    • @JasonMitchellofcompsci
      @JasonMitchellofcompsci 7 лет назад +15

      A parker square is him saying money is logorithmic because it fits linearly on log scale. But USD isn't because it's all the sames size... which would still fit linearly on a log scale.

    • @yoavshati
      @yoavshati 6 лет назад +24

      Parker calculator

    • @aaroncsoka7294
      @aaroncsoka7294 6 лет назад +2

      ...Murphy's Law also strong on this one, haha 😅

    • @ShroudedWolf51
      @ShroudedWolf51 5 лет назад

      Two words: Dead horse.

    • @PewReview
      @PewReview 4 года назад +1

      I was JUST about to comment that, damn.

  • @Will6753
    @Will6753 8 лет назад +198

    Even though the big one didn't work, you still set the record, and impressed a lot of people out there.

    • @Will6753
      @Will6753 8 лет назад +13

      Also this gave me yet another reason to be scared that my calculator is wrong during a test, oh boy.

    • @vicr123
      @vicr123 8 лет назад +15

      Nah, electricity isn't dominos. (That sounds weird.) You'll be fine. Good luck :)

    • @the_diamond_arrow1901
      @the_diamond_arrow1901 7 лет назад +4

      Yah don't be disappointed you got the record

    • @texannationalist5887
      @texannationalist5887 7 лет назад +6

      unless you calculator is so compact that quantum tunneling becomes an issue, I wouldn't worry about it

  • @ZogZog333
    @ZogZog333 7 лет назад +23

    "Can I help you?"
    "Yes, I'd like to return these sets of dominoes please..."

    • @tobiaspal
      @tobiaspal 2 года назад +2

      "Why?"
      "They are buggy when adding two 4 bit numbers..."

  • @guilldea
    @guilldea 7 лет назад +257

    the problem they had is kind of the problem classical computer architecture has with quantum physics

    • @ferociousfeind8538
      @ferociousfeind8538 7 лет назад +86

      Guille Arana Exactly! Such a good analogy!
      An electron simply jumping past a gap is exactly like a domino flying off to start a new signal!

    • @guilldea
      @guilldea 7 лет назад +22

      If its gonna fuck with us we might as well harness it :)

    • @Nillis97
      @Nillis97 7 лет назад +8

      Guille Arana for what? Randomness?

    • @guilldea
      @guilldea 6 лет назад +12

      Panda Matata quantum tunneling, particles can jump a bridge they shouldn be allowed to (classicaly)

    • @avirukbasak
      @avirukbasak 3 года назад +3

      Exactly!

  • @Hevesh5
    @Hevesh5 10 лет назад +458

    I'm a 'professional domino builder' and I hate building with mexican train dominoes because they spread out so much when they fall :/ (especially when turning). If only you had put some sort of barrier at each turn, blocking the dominoes from spreading out and hitting another line, it would have worked perfectly :D Interesting concept though making a computer out of dominoes!

    • @DFX2KX
      @DFX2KX 10 лет назад +14

      don't they have particular dominoes for that sort of thing? They're colorful, and have hard edges?

    • @robsim37
      @robsim37 10 лет назад +68

      I was thinking precisely the same thing about placing blocking material between the lines. This is essentially what insulation on wiring does for electronics. It prevents signal "bleed":.

    • @TheHamoodz
      @TheHamoodz 10 лет назад +19

      Hevesh! big fan here, can u please try to make a a computer just like what they did? PLEASE?

    • @Kaplamino
      @Kaplamino 10 лет назад +10

      Hey Hevesh, why you don't try to make it bigger ^^

    • @ForOhFor
      @ForOhFor 10 лет назад +18

      Gotta insulate your wires, yeah.

  • @grahamrich9956
    @grahamrich9956 8 лет назад +373

    The bleed problem reminded me of the quantum tunneling problem computers are soon to run into. Very interesting.

    • @leungclj
      @leungclj 8 лет назад +61

      +Graham Rich yup, quantum tunneling came up in my head too. The gap between two domino line are too close to each other, if the distance between two domino line is less than the width of a domino, the probability of a tunneling is much greater. Of course, if the lines are above and beyond the width of a domino, then the likely hood of tunneling decreases.
      Exactly the same thing is real circuit, probability and electron cloud.

    • @DigGil3
      @DigGil3 8 лет назад +29

      +Graham Rich Bleeding might also occur on a relatively macroscopic scale due stray capacitance, noisy lines from radiation, conductive particles sitting inbetween lines, etc.

    • @htmlguy88
      @htmlguy88 8 лет назад +5

      +梁致朗(Jonathan Leung) width or height ? because technically if it falls straight and doesn't get flung it might as well be height which may be as many as three times the width.

    • @bonbonpony
      @bonbonpony 8 лет назад +13

      +Graham Rich Now build a quantum computer out of dominoes ;)

    • @grahamrich9956
      @grahamrich9956 8 лет назад +6

      Bon Bon On it.

  • @icic
    @icic 7 лет назад +321

    9 + 3 = 30

    • @tgvv2980
      @tgvv2980 7 лет назад +44

      Isak Hammarlund a parker sum!

    • @Ali107
      @Ali107 7 лет назад +20

      9 + 10 = 21?

    • @traywor1615
      @traywor1615 4 года назад +5

      @@Ali107 It's only the half of the answer.

    • @faiselbutt2944
      @faiselbutt2944 3 года назад +8

      The answer is in base 4

    • @AdityaRaj-ez1te
      @AdityaRaj-ez1te 3 года назад

      It could become a new meme

  • @lxschwalb
    @lxschwalb 3 года назад +5

    It did correctly add 0 + 0 before you tried 9 + 3, so it was a partial success

  • @Xnerdz1
    @Xnerdz1 8 лет назад +705

    I bet Microsoft based their Vista OS on dominos

    • @moorefilmltd
      @moorefilmltd 8 лет назад +9

      wooden dominos

    • @nicholaslau3194
      @nicholaslau3194 7 лет назад +20

      No. Windows is an operating system, the dominos represent the CPU at the hardware level.

    • @moorefilmltd
      @moorefilmltd 7 лет назад

      +Nicholas Lau makes more sense

    • @sazibas
      @sazibas 7 лет назад +7

      It was really nice to see you achieved the quantum barrier on your extremely squeezed domino computer. The Moore's Law probably not applicable in this context

    • @porteal8986
      @porteal8986 7 лет назад +2

      -_-

  • @Snickersmaan
    @Snickersmaan 8 лет назад +2771

    still faster than internet explorer

    • @SethiozProject
      @SethiozProject 8 лет назад +75

      +Snickersmaan I agree + it's virus and adware free!

    • @theg4mer6474
      @theg4mer6474 8 лет назад +63

      Time to necro! It could easily be infected with a "virus". Step.1 Throw a rock at it.

    • @dogman9223
      @dogman9223 8 лет назад +2

      +theg4mer6474 lel

    • @Reragi
      @Reragi 8 лет назад +10

      +theg4mer6474 step 1B: make a fat guy walk beside it

    • @theg4mer6474
      @theg4mer6474 8 лет назад +1

      Reragi With Clogs.

  • @AntonioZL
    @AntonioZL 3 года назад +12

    I remember watching this 4 years ago, understanding almost none of it. Today, xor/and gates, half adders, all of it is clear as the sky to me. These are the moments where you notice that studying hard paid off.

  • @creepymaestro2843
    @creepymaestro2843 5 лет назад +14

    16:47 to 17:00 was the most tense moment of my life

  • @Droggelbecherbot
    @Droggelbecherbot 8 лет назад +1745

    So that's how those minecraft calculators work..

    • @lapissheepz8741
      @lapissheepz8741 8 лет назад +194

      Actually, not far fro the truth.

    • @randomnobody660
      @randomnobody660 8 лет назад +62

      ideally, no. There are 2 ways of calculating the carrying bit that im aware of.
      One (ripple carry adder) is to wait for the previous calculation to finish so for example if you add 010 with 011 you add 0 and 1, you add the rightmost 0 and 1, you get a 1 and a carry of 0, then you add the middle 1, 1, and the carry 0, getting a 0 and carry 1, you then add 0 0 and 1 to get 1 to get 101. This is slow and seems to be what is done here.
      The faster way that requires more hardware but makes it faster (carry lookahead adder). Adding the abc with def, you do 3 calculations simultaneous
      1. you add a, d, and [ (b and e) or ( (b xor e) and (c and f) ) ] to get x
      2. you add b, e, and [ c and f ] to get y
      3. you add c and f to get z
      in all 3 cases just assume 1+1=0 because we dont care about the carry bit, also in hindsight all three "add"'s probably should be replaced with "xor" for consistency, but you get the point.
      Your answer will be xyz.
      I'm sure you noticed while a lot of stuff is redone, the 2nd method will reach a result in 4 cycles. While the 1st seems more efficient, it takes significant more to reach the result.
      So no, +LapisSheepz, ideally, this is NOT how mc calcs work...right? At least a mixture after the size of the gate becomes a pain?

    • @randomnobody660
      @randomnobody660 8 лет назад +63

      Also, in MC you have creative ways to make gates. With domino, you essentially make transistors, so...um...theres that too.
      I am aware that transistors are easy to make in MC; 1 piston blocking a signal would do it. i've just never seen anybody do it. Perhaps because it makes projects needlessly big since you can make most gates in comparable space?

    • @randomnobody660
      @randomnobody660 8 лет назад +12

      ***** well, not in mc, but im told irl cla gets slower as huge gates are inherently slow. Too many transistors per gate.
      Legend speaks of a combination that works well when doing, say, 32 digit calculations.
      It also doesn't take nearly as much space as a full CLA

    • @timothynaff2663
      @timothynaff2663 7 лет назад +32

      Except in minecraft the "force " used is a lot closer to electricity so you can make it without moving parts/ having to set up the computer for specific numbers

  • @rohanpandey2037
    @rohanpandey2037 8 лет назад +160

    They should show this video in computer science classes.

    • @kanecobe
      @kanecobe 8 лет назад +1

      +Rohan Pandey yes. yes they should

    • @stoneoxmike3036
      @stoneoxmike3036 8 лет назад +10

      It was definitely interesting and awesome, but as a student, I thought it was fairly low level and didn't really explain anything other than 2 logic gates and basic circuitry. Most students would be better off buying a book in my opinion. That being said, it would have been interesting to see this video when I was just starting to learn.

    • @VintageLJ
      @VintageLJ 8 лет назад +1

      +Rohan Pandey Maybe at a secondary level.

    • @IroAppe
      @IroAppe 7 лет назад +9

      A concept that is vastly underestimated is motivation. In the beginning, I would suggest that motivation is the most important thing, even more important than content. Because - once you have built up a strong motivation, a foundation, a reason why you want to comprehend the whole topic - once you have that, all learning will work better. Because you always can link your current situation to your greater vision of motivation, and that is a strong driver.
      That video is for that reason: Building up motivation. I have watched much in the past, that does not teach that much content in time, what could have been done, taking another style. But all that added to my motivation and fascination of the topic.

    • @MrCmon113
      @MrCmon113 5 лет назад

      It's a bit long, but you could mention it as a fun example of the different ways you can realize boolean operations with different signals.

  • @alistairbugg2413
    @alistairbugg2413 7 лет назад +469

    Faster than Australian Internet.

  • @wallywutsizface6346
    @wallywutsizface6346 7 лет назад +24

    19:53
    When a teacher asks why you did your homework incorrectly

  • @GhostDrow
    @GhostDrow 9 лет назад +224

    You CAN build a computer out of domino's...as long as you are ok with 1 process destroying the computer.

    • @IrizarryBrandon
      @IrizarryBrandon 9 лет назад +1

      GhostDrow LOL

    • @columbus8myhw
      @columbus8myhw 8 лет назад +1

      You can make it happen with more reliability; you just need more dominoes (for error-correcting), or more space, or both.

    • @vinzbrain
      @vinzbrain 8 лет назад +5

      +GhostDrow just use Windows for that

    • @columbus8myhw
      @columbus8myhw 8 лет назад +21

      vinzbrain An array of windows would be even worse, since the glass breaks every time one falls over. Unless you're suggesting using some sort of optic phenomenon?

    • @Fornost461
      @Fornost461 8 лет назад

      +columbus8myhw He probably meant the operating system, not actual windows (notice the use of the majuscule in his comment).

  • @simovihinen875
    @simovihinen875 9 лет назад +132

    What you COULD do is create a software that builds your domino computers for you and runs the simulation in a virtual environment.

    • @simovihinen875
      @simovihinen875 9 лет назад +27

      And then you insert the domino software's code itself into the program and watch it loop infinitely creating the most overawingly mesmerising fractals.
      I'll have half of that Fields medal please.

    • @1987kokoli
      @1987kokoli 8 лет назад +4

      Simo Vihinen dominocomputingception

    • @simovihinen875
      @simovihinen875 8 лет назад +1

      WHY does everyone refer to that one movie every time something goes on another meta level these days? I'm fairly sure there was a time when that wasn't the only time that happened. Friggin' JOAN studied pataphysical science in the home back in '69.

    • @1987kokoli
      @1987kokoli 8 лет назад +1

      Simo Vihinen well, I wasn't aware of joan and similarly, other people might not be aware of it either. I surely wouldn't make that reference

    • @mthlay15
      @mthlay15 8 лет назад +3

      minecraft?

  • @ariryan8832
    @ariryan8832 7 лет назад +69

    This video makes me so anxious watching it. >_

    • @BodomsScythe
      @BodomsScythe 7 лет назад +18

      I know, right? Especially 11:00 :D
      EDIT: Okay, I saw 16:46 now... Holy cow Dx

    • @ariryan8832
      @ariryan8832 7 лет назад +3

      Had3s Ikr.

  • @Salisbury2015
    @Salisbury2015 Год назад +1

    I love how this was shot and edited! And Matt's enthusiasm as well as that of the team really shined through. Wonderful video.

  • @Digging4AnswersOfficial
    @Digging4AnswersOfficial 8 лет назад +851

    Can it run Crysis at 4K?

    • @HappyBeezerStudios
      @HappyBeezerStudios 7 лет назад +97

      Surely if you build a display for it and solve the problem of bringing the dominoes back up.
      And if you are talking of playing in 4x3 with 10 frames per month?
      Than it can run Crysis.

    • @hamzakais1762
      @hamzakais1762 7 лет назад +3

      lmao

    • @Templarfreak
      @Templarfreak 7 лет назад +18

      But can it run it in 4K AND in 60FPS?

    • @thiantromp6607
      @thiantromp6607 7 лет назад +48

      Digging4Answers at one frame per week

    • @GeometryDashEndermaster
      @GeometryDashEndermaster 7 лет назад +41

      1 frame per 100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 eons

  • @TevelDrinkwater
    @TevelDrinkwater 10 лет назад +12

    It was cool seeing the 3 bit version work, but in some ways it was even cooler seeing the 4 bit version not work, and how it didn't work.

  • @fasterlight3834
    @fasterlight3834 3 года назад +2

    absolutely brilliant! also a clear demonstration of how much of the heavy lifting transistors do in your system, and how incredibly reliable they should be!

  • @jeremiahhunter7147
    @jeremiahhunter7147 7 лет назад +7

    This is amazing. It explains the missing link I've had for years: how 0s and 1s work together to make bigger numbers.

  • @robbiedart7422
    @robbiedart7422 10 лет назад +32

    I just hope everyone who watched it truly appreciated the ingenuity of what they were watching!

  • @mixttime
    @mixttime 10 лет назад +9

    I always love Matt and his optimistic ways of explaining a situation where something looks really bad. I think my favorite in that department is Grahm's number. Something along the lines of "While the range may seem huge, in the frame of reference of all numbers there are infinitely more outside the range than inside it. So we've pretty much nailed it"

  • @DevotedMonk
    @DevotedMonk Год назад +7

    I love re-watching this, but now I'm thinking it's time to break the record again and make it bigger! mostly because i really find pleasure in learning about the trouble shooting when it goes wrong

  • @tonyagueci7494
    @tonyagueci7494 6 лет назад

    This video made me cry tears of joy because I was baffled on how people like you can think of something out of the ordinary, and then pull it off, no matter how complex the task is! I probably would've never been able to figure out how the circuit failed in the second attempt, so hats off to you!

  • @charlotte1924
    @charlotte1924 8 лет назад +180

    THEORETICALLY, in a perfect world where the dominoes would reset them selves, would you be able to play super mario?

    • @echaen1707
      @echaen1707 8 лет назад +69

      This is how part of a computer works: the ALU (Arithmetic and Logic Unit). It's the bit of the CPU which adds. An ALU in a real computer, however, is able to add, subtract, and perform logical "bitwise" operations such as XOR or LSHIFT. Besides that, a modern computer also has a Processor, a Clock and Main Memory. So while this is certainly a computer, in that it can compute, it's not capable of running a program.

    • @charlotte1924
      @charlotte1924 8 лет назад +4

      Would be cool though. ;)

    • @alexandriariley5209
      @alexandriariley5209 8 лет назад +7

      +Dan Jones Only if you had some sort of domino LCD screen. In Minecraft, you would be able to build one using minecarts and redstone (using glass for the LCD screen).

    • @CASTCorp
      @CASTCorp 8 лет назад +27

      Sure, if you're ok playing super mario 1 frame every minute!

    • @bonbonpony
      @bonbonpony 8 лет назад +3

      +Dan Jones To do that, a real breakthrough is needed: to separate the information stored in the system (the actual 0s and 1s) from the flow of "charge" (the falling dominoes).

  • @Srcsqwrn
    @Srcsqwrn 10 лет назад +19

    Now this whole domino show was quite amazing. I like seeing the inputs and outputs physically work. Thanks, fantastic.

  • @AnonymousFreakYT
    @AnonymousFreakYT 7 лет назад

    Just discovered this, obviously. And I love the gate examples. Very good at showing not only how actual logic circuits work, but also at real problems! In your XOR gate, you demonstrate current leakage very well - when the signal goes "around" when it shouldn't.

  • @honestgoat
    @honestgoat 5 лет назад

    Its actually a really good way of demonstrating logic gates. Props guys. not just for the concept, but for how much effort you put into this.

  • @Nogli
    @Nogli 8 лет назад +50

    What a shame. A real Parker Square moment.

    • @Gotonis
      @Gotonis 6 лет назад +2

      He gave it a go

  • @LemonChieff
    @LemonChieff 8 лет назад +70

    The result proves that with transistors getting smaller every year this kind of problem would happen in a real computer...
    The signal would intersect and shit would hit the fan this is why it's getting harder to create smaller circuits and this is one of the reasons why your computer probably has multiple cores instead of a really condensed core

    • @giedriusgrigas6384
      @giedriusgrigas6384 8 лет назад +2

      The transistors cannot really become as small as physically possible. Dont quote me on that , but they are about 50 atoms in length. And making them smaller would allow electrons to tunner through semiconductors. So yea, your point is valid

    • @Ardenmorsolias
      @Ardenmorsolias 8 лет назад +6

      +Lemon Chief That's why we have quantum computers.

    • @HamguyBacon
      @HamguyBacon 8 лет назад +1

      +Lemon Chief yeah no, this isnt exactly how real computers work its a demonstration.
      Future computers will be ternary computers instead of binary and use Electrons, Atoms and Protons which are naturally negative positive and neutral.

    • @firefox21xl
      @firefox21xl 8 лет назад +2

      +Hamguy Bacon I'm gonna need source on using atoms and protons. A proton does not behave in the same way an electron does & an atom consists of protons, neutrons, and electrons in a (relatively) large construct so again, won't behave in a way useful to computations. It is possible to have ternary computation, the Soviets had them. If these made a comeback it would use something like voltages (if its 0 plus or minus 0.5 its read as 0, over that is positive (1) and under that is negative (-1)).

    • @Dome98Otaku
      @Dome98Otaku 8 лет назад +1

      +firefox21xl Just read up on quantum computers. They don't use the voltages but the spin of electrons.

  • @joeyscerbo7776
    @joeyscerbo7776 7 лет назад +10

    My dogs came running in and I was afraid that they were going to knock the dominos down!

  • @krakow10
    @krakow10 7 лет назад +35

    I hear that deadmau5 - Maths remix, good choice

    • @zenpigeon5944
      @zenpigeon5944 5 лет назад

      Came down here to comment about that!

  • @MaxPanic
    @MaxPanic 10 лет назад +56

    That was awesome! It's a little know fact that many early computers actually used tiny dominos to perform calculation.

  • @TheDiggster13
    @TheDiggster13 10 лет назад +52

    This has actually explained to me how computers count. Great way of visualising the problem.

    • @Supergeckos1000
      @Supergeckos1000 10 лет назад +3

      There's no problem.

    • @TheDiggster13
      @TheDiggster13 10 лет назад +7

      There was something I didn't know. There is a method to how it works. I did not know that method. I now know how it works. Matches my definition of a problem.

    • @Supergeckos1000
      @Supergeckos1000 10 лет назад +2

      So it's _your_ problem, but not _the_ problem?

    • @RedTriangle53
      @RedTriangle53 10 лет назад +19

      Lizard771 Then what the fuck else is this video for? Is the problem "how to push dominoes"?

    • @NNOTM
      @NNOTM 10 лет назад

      I suppose this is nit-picking, but note that this is adding, not counting. Counting would be repeatably adding one. Which is also something computers do, using the same circuit.

  • @roofusonna1846
    @roofusonna1846 7 лет назад +24

    We are at the frontiers of domino computing.

  • @bjarnes.4423
    @bjarnes.4423 5 лет назад

    Watching this again a few years later, I can say that this video got me started with programming! Thanks for that Matt!!

  • @Tasarran
    @Tasarran 10 лет назад +6

    This is nerve-wracking just watching; must have been crazy working on it!

  • @woodfur00
    @woodfur00 8 лет назад +1082

    Can this computer run Linux

    • @andrewxc1335
      @andrewxc1335 8 лет назад +219

      +woodfur00 Yes, but only once.

    • @Brok3nC4rrot
      @Brok3nC4rrot 8 лет назад +70

      +andrewxc1335 No, it's only a four-bit computer. Linux requires an at-least 32-bit processor.

    • @josephkeeley4898
      @josephkeeley4898 8 лет назад +12

      +Brok3nC4rrot So it could happen! Thats awesome!

    • @ethanplant434
      @ethanplant434 8 лет назад +8

      +Joseph Keeley No this is one circuit maybe if this was 100000% bigger but last time checked computer can do more than math :)

    • @josephkeeley4898
      @josephkeeley4898 8 лет назад

      +ZE catarmy ok... ):

  • @jacksonstein809
    @jacksonstein809 5 лет назад +2

    This is incredible! Not only did you create a calculator out of dominos, which is very awesome, but you gave me a better fundamental understanding of computers. Before watching this video, I had no idea how computers could work, but now it makes sense how very simple circuits (gates) can work together to create powerful calculators capable of out-performing even the brightest human. Thank you for this video.

    • @yosefmacgruber1920
      @yosefmacgruber1920 5 лет назад

      My first computer, an Apple //e, its 6502 CPU, can not multiply nor divide. It only does one-byte addition, and subtraction, and various bit shifts. 8-bit data bus, and 16-bit address bus. Only 1 8-bit accumulator, and just 2 8-bit index registers. Yet when I ran AppleWorks on it, somehow it can multiply, divide, do y^x, do trigonometric functions, etc., and do all that to multiple bytes of accuracy. What gives? Well all of that stuff, can be derived in the form of iterations of additions and bit-shifts, so even its very limited CPU commands, are easily enough to compute just about anything. Although, not nearly as fast as modern computers can do it.

  • @gregkrazanski
    @gregkrazanski 7 лет назад

    wow... honestly loved this style of editing, super dynamic. never thought of seeing anything presented this way before

  • @ApollonianKing
    @ApollonianKing 8 лет назад +35

    You sir, whether or not your invention so well manifested by such dapper and trustworthy domino standers actually worked, are a wonderful and intimidatingly intelligent man. It's been great seeing you develop your own RUclips Channel, as it always is when I watch these videos from your collegiate associates about Math and science in general. Merci.

  • @tevaalcindor
    @tevaalcindor 8 лет назад +391

    Nope. My computer's still slower.

    • @user-qj2pc2yz9f
      @user-qj2pc2yz9f 8 лет назад +1

      +TheJman0205 Windows XP is better than the rest, except for Windows 7.

    • @user-qj2pc2yz9f
      @user-qj2pc2yz9f 8 лет назад +1

      ***** Sadly true. However I would consider it the best when comparing the OS' in its prime. Well, if the OS HAD a prime (looking at you Vista and ME).

    • @UnityGamin
      @UnityGamin 8 лет назад

      +Keep On With The Force and 10

    • @bonbonpony
      @bonbonpony 8 лет назад +5

      +Teva Alcindor Did you build it from racing snails or something? :J
      Sounds like a neat idea for breaking another world record: to build the SLOWEST computer on the world ;)

    • @mysss29
      @mysss29 7 лет назад +1

      ...is...that...a thing...?
      ...no, it couldn't possibly... *checks*

  • @RemyNote
    @RemyNote 7 лет назад +1

    Glad you brought these bits down to words in a bytesized format.
    Hexsterical.

  • @faithmagohara1529
    @faithmagohara1529 7 лет назад

    the camera transitions in this video is so good! I watched it like three times because it was so fun to watch

  • @PopeLando
    @PopeLando 10 лет назад +27

    This *does* need to be on computerphile, along with a slightly more detailed explanation of how the dominoes are representing the action of electrons in silicon, germanium and the other materials. As Matt said, but could have emphasised even more, this Domino computer is a physical representation of ... a *physical* thing, actual things being knocked out to block pathways, etc.

    • @NNOTM
      @NNOTM 10 лет назад +4

      Note that the way the gates are built in dominoes does not exactly represent the way they are built with semiconductors. In semiconductors, you are usually limited to two kinds of transistors. The XOR gate for example has eight transistors in a typical (CMOS) circuit, which are connected in a totally different way than the Dominoes. You could emulate the transistors with dominoes, but the gates would be three times as large or something like that.

    • @thephpjo
      @thephpjo 10 лет назад

      as you probably noticed by now: it is on computerphile

    • @NNOTM
      @NNOTM 10 лет назад +1

      thephpjo
      It is on numberphile

  • @devjock
    @devjock 10 лет назад +13

    Now that's a nice ripple counter! This is absolutely amazing! The half adders are beautifully constructed. No hard feelings that the 2's and 16's also fell. In modern electronic CPU's this is also a real problem, with electrons interacting on parrallel running data busses. The scale is towards the nanometers, but the effect is perfectly demonstrated. Really cool to see the large scale version be so accurate to it. Also, "The bit that keeps you awake at night" is a nice pun man ;)

  • @archithbhalotia120
    @archithbhalotia120 7 лет назад

    This is freaking awesome! Earlier I thought that this would be a stupid video regarding dominos, but the idea of using them as adders and gates is amazing !

  • @spyrgelispyy
    @spyrgelispyy 3 года назад +3

    This was actually a really interesting and clear way to describe how computers work and what problems might occur

  • @kevinocta9716
    @kevinocta9716 10 лет назад +11

    Is it weird that while watching this video, I'm scarred to bump my desk to knock over the dominoes in the video?

  • @JohnGabrielUk
    @JohnGabrielUk 10 лет назад +93

    Great! Now make it Turing complete.

    • @jwnavagus
      @jwnavagus 10 лет назад +20

      No, why spend all that time to talk to us. We need the answer to the meaning of the universe. Quatum Domino Computer. QDC! QDC! QDC! QDC! QDC! QDC!

    • @Fen1kz
      @Fen1kz 10 лет назад

      isn't it already? domino + builders as reset

    • @JohnGabrielUk
      @JohnGabrielUk 10 лет назад +1

      Fen1kz Turing machines need to be able to read and write to memory, though.

    • @Fen1kz
      @Fen1kz 10 лет назад

      John Gabriel ahhh, yisss, sry, missed that point

    • @MegaMementoMori
      @MegaMementoMori 10 лет назад +2

      You mean a domino computer that will pass the Turing test? 0_o
      I can imagine a domino computer that would be indistinguishable from a human ;)

  • @danieloh6782
    @danieloh6782 7 лет назад +97

    That would be so stressful to build

  • @cbranalli
    @cbranalli 7 лет назад +1

    incredibly clever and awesomely executed piece of work.
    love the presentation.

  • @lolatomroflsinnlos
    @lolatomroflsinnlos 8 лет назад +11

    19:01 At least George Lucas in the background is happy.

  • @LazerLord10
    @LazerLord10 8 лет назад +25

    How did you do that video tiling effect? It looks really nice!

  • @TheFloatingSheep
    @TheFloatingSheep 7 лет назад +56

    Ok now you just need to build a little AI car that places the dominos based on a map,
    and then make a huge one, with 4 gigs of ram and a quad core processor.
    This is the future, who needs small computers, these are cooler.

    • @niklasgransjen684
      @niklasgransjen684 7 лет назад +1

      TheFloatingSheep
      Gonna play some rad games on my domino computer

    • @uiomancannot7931
      @uiomancannot7931 7 лет назад +1

      Why do you need a car? just put a string on the bottom and tighten it when you need to reuse it.

    • @TheFloatingSheep
      @TheFloatingSheep 7 лет назад +2

      Uioman Cannot well you need one to build it, we're talking about billions of dominos, nobody's got time fo da shit

    • @uiomancannot7931
      @uiomancannot7931 7 лет назад +3

      Well yeah. but it would be better with something like that. magnets might even work.

    • @CHKDSKHasTheBigGay
      @CHKDSKHasTheBigGay 7 лет назад +1

      build the ai car out of dominos

  • @bloodyl_uk
    @bloodyl_uk 5 лет назад

    one of the best 20 minutes I've spent. Thank you.

  • @LukasDolezal
    @LukasDolezal 8 лет назад +3

    This is actually incredible! It very nicely shows what exact difficulties are there engineering smaller and smaller silicon circuits. I would not be disappointed by the failure, rather the failure is actually the fun part on makings progress and as it was show for kids in museum that is something that young engineers need to see - not be afraid of failure.

  • @Tasarran
    @Tasarran 10 лет назад +4

    I think it was actually a good thing that your circuit was also able to accurately model what happens when you reduce the size of a real circuit.
    In my mind that makes it an even better demonstration than a perfect run would have been.

  • @elgiad007
    @elgiad007 3 года назад

    Loved this concept, also the scrolling video format!

  • @aggelosgekas3322
    @aggelosgekas3322 6 лет назад

    That's some real dedication!! You deserve an award for this!!

  • @andyarijs
    @andyarijs 10 лет назад +22

    Numberphile brought me here.

  • @theyesoap
    @theyesoap 8 лет назад +3

    Brilliant! I am in awe. I love your irreverent yet deeply profound love of maths. If only you'd been around earlier Matt. You're a natural. A excellent ambassador for mathematics and science. Well done! I am very impressed.

  • @EtzEchad
    @EtzEchad 5 лет назад

    I would love for you to do this again. It really is a wonderful demonstration of how computers work. (And how they don't work.)

  • @sharkdavid
    @sharkdavid 7 лет назад

    Is it Christmas? Because this gives me pure joy. THE JOY OF SCIENCE!!!

  • @SteelSkin667
    @SteelSkin667 10 лет назад +6

    The signal bleed and timing problems are things that actually happen in the circuits of a computer. Having to space things out a little bit to avoid leaks and making circuits that zig-zag to adjust the timing are actually steps that are taken when developing chips and circuit boards..

  • @IMortage
    @IMortage 10 лет назад +11

    My first thought on announcement of which numbers will be added: "Why just decide to add 4 and 6? Why not ask a kid which numbers to add to prove it could do any of them?"
    Probable answer: "Some variations would be kinda lame to run. You want to have to do a calculation that looks reasonably cool in execution."

    • @JonathanSanderson
      @JonathanSanderson 10 лет назад +1

      I think the first time Matt rolled dice or something, but it took a long time and was all a bit confused on camera, so I cut that sequence. For the second run we had somebody from the audience pick a random domino, which you can see at 15:30.

  • @juicedmaster
    @juicedmaster 7 лет назад

    I never fully understood how electronic components (more complicated than resistors and capacitors) worked till watching this! Thank you!

  • @thomasalexander1563
    @thomasalexander1563 7 лет назад

    Really put hard work to do this..
    Thank you for the team to make amazing content..

  • @robbowman8770
    @robbowman8770 8 лет назад +3

    what a great endeavour. .. so many concepts that are good analogies to real logic circuits. With dominoes!

  • @shri03992
    @shri03992 8 лет назад +4

    This was way more interesting than Domino Day!

  • @katie98711
    @katie98711 8 лет назад +16

    It's the Paker Square Domino Calculator!

  • @simona625
    @simona625 2 года назад

    Watching this made my brain work overtime and come up with a modular 3D printable design to, 1 - prevent any errors, and 2 - make any size calculation possible

  • @darkmage07070777
    @darkmage07070777 10 лет назад +8

    18:00 - I was literally biting my knuckles over this to work. So heartbreaking at the end, but amazing stuff anyway!

  • @ChibiRuah
    @ChibiRuah 10 лет назад +8

    Although you failed. The effect and result were still awesome. just watching the inputs flow as so fun. Congrats you guys

  • @firstlast-cs6eg
    @firstlast-cs6eg 5 лет назад

    Watching this allowed me to understand programing and computers slightly better, even if I sorta understood some of it before. Thankyou

  • @ColinTimmins
    @ColinTimmins 6 лет назад

    That was so close I'd call that a win for proof of concept. Good work guys!

  • @donpicklle2663
    @donpicklle2663 8 лет назад +11

    I would've knocked over the entire thing by accident. lol

  • @the_diamond_arrow1901
    @the_diamond_arrow1901 7 лет назад +6

    Your videos are so great 😁 you deserve more subscribers than you have

  • @frazer26
    @frazer26 3 года назад

    Love how this shows logic gates, diodes, cross talk and differential pairs

  • @juliusplaysgames
    @juliusplaysgames 4 года назад

    Amazing work Math and the team!

  • @SenseiLeRoof
    @SenseiLeRoof 8 лет назад +4

    I love how he has such good humor about the parts that shouldn't have happened.

  • @michaellieberman114
    @michaellieberman114 8 лет назад +4

    Theoretically, you COULD build a domino calculator that did everything where the answer and the input numbers (question) were all less than 100.
    If you had a few square miles of free perfectly flat space you could do that.
    They need to invent ways to automatically make domino's stand up after being toppled, or have delay domino's that don't require turns and winding around things to add delay.

    • @brycemckechnie4928
      @brycemckechnie4928 7 лет назад

      But do you use dominoes to pull the strings and reset the circuit?

  • @renouncedequation3923
    @renouncedequation3923 7 лет назад

    Dude, the stuff you do is so interesting and genius...

  • @StarDoesntUpload
    @StarDoesntUpload 5 лет назад

    You should do this again. This is awesome.