My Other Channels: ruclips.net/channel/UCI06Kdk5Gp67dsgrdbh8lLA ruclips.net/channel/UCyJaQIf2CnXT0jELkPeO4CQ No copyright is intended, all rights go to its respective owners!
We lived in quite remarkable era of tennis with everything set in the best possible and fairest way. Imagine if Federer had two handed backhand or if there are two major on clay or Novak didn't have those early fitness problems or if anyone of them was in different era, things could have been vastly different. So anyone could be your GOAT but they made this era as GOAT's era.
There is no thing as "your GOAT". Stats say that Djokovic is clearly the greatest tennis player of all time. Not just by GS count. But most major records he is either number one or 2 with few exceptions. 1) Djokovic 2) Federer 3) Nadal. Facts don't care for your feelings unfortunately
@@HalaMadrid15UCL As a hardcore djokovic fan, I do think that the question of " if Federer had a two handed backhand " is legitimate, since one handed backhand is so much inferior for morphological reasons. We will never know of course
These two GOATS are heavy hitters. Still playing at a very HIGH LEVEL way deep in the 5th set! Even though this was in 2010, this highlight is way better than ay highlights we have in year 2023!!!!Today's players lack that endurance and grit!
@@tolendoi123no I’m with him. The big 3 reigned for nearly 20 years. They are the goats. Djokovic has 2 more than Nadal and 4 more than Federer. If you look past them the next guy is Pete Sampras who is at 14, not even in the 20 range
I feel like Federer actually played better in this match than in the 07, 08, 09, 11, 15 matches but it’s just that this was the most confident and free-swinging Djokovic had ever been in his career up to that point
as a federer fan this match was amazing because of the time difference I remember watching it very late in night not sleeping as a kid in a dark room trying to not make noise and wake up mom and dad like while watching such a high quality roller coaster of ball striking it was crazy
Can watch this match time and time again... every half a year or so. Just the first minute and a half already, brutal Federer offensive tennis/striking.
Your highlights are magnificent especially this old games where normally the quality and length of the other highlights is pretty bad and lackluster while yours are incredibly detailed to a point that it seems I´m watching the game live keep up the excellent work.
Its the moments that get away from Federer. Time and time again. Start of the 2nd set. 40-15 serving for 1-1. He ends up getting broken and the set goes quickly. Rafa and Novak are simply far more clinical. Roger playing a flat 2nd set cost him dearly. At the end so many of his decisions were so off. God i loved him, but his defeats were always so damn painful/avoidable. This match changed the rivalry forever. What a tennis match though. The rallies and movement are just phenomenal. Djokovic got the perfect tennis schooling. Constantly having to go up against Fed and Nadal in major semis/finals. What hes done in surpassing them both is incredible. Djokovic celebration was so cool at the end.
It was a problem from the start of the season 2010. But it is what it is. Roger was an amazing player and the most beatiful to watch. These loses doesn`t matter now.
He celebrated like that cause he knows he just beat the greatest talent of all time..If there were 1000 tournaments on grass and less clay and hard Fed would of been #1 in world more often than Novak. He was seeded 2 and Nadal 1 because Nadal accumulated many points months prior winning 1000 clay tournaments and FO.
he sell that idea, but he is not really! every player at the top needs to be really mentally though! and he did invent anything! he is just to much vocal about it!
The court speed slowed overtime, and his footwork decreased due to age. Also, something I didn't realize is that the 85 and 90 square inch heads allowed him to whip the forehand through the air much faster than his 97. I'm not exactly sure why. Could be age, and a smaller head size means less mass to swing. That's probably why with the new RF 01 he tried to replicate that.
@@TheGodsMustBeCrazy So true, the bigger raquet made his forehand suffer a lot, but helped his backhand; That is why with 97 he had more success against Nadal by improving his backhand, but on the other hand he ruined his chances against Novak, where his forehand was what made him competitive against Novak before. That is to say, what helped him on the one hand, hurt him on the other. Federer's forehand in the '19 Wimbledon finals was not even 50% of what it was with the racket 85, 90
I remember being such a fed fan at this point! but at the end, I was really happy for novak! and happy for Roger as well! one more time he proves that you had to go to 5 sets to win him! so he play really well!
Looking back, it's kind of surprised that Novak's backhand was kind of weak at this stage. He couldn't control Roger's backhand with cross-court shot from his own backhand, which was basically his biggest advantage in their matches since 2011.
Imponente el nivel de este legendario partido. Federer sacaba y pegaba con un 🔨 y #djokovic hacía lo mismo y se contorsionaba como si fuera el hombre elástico, vamos de cómic. Aquí subió al #olimpo del tenus el serbio, especialmente en el 5° set con 5-4 en contra y remontando (con su enorme juego) 2 ó 3 bolas de partido. Majestuoso.
The fact that the other 2 were mental monsters doesnt mean Federer was "fragile". Couldnt have won 20 slams with a "fragile" head. What would Sampras, Laver or Borg be then? mentally retarded?
Federer´s backhand was never "weak"; the one handed backhand is the toughest shot in tennis, its never gonna be as consistent as a two hander, where you have the help of the two arms holding and directing the ball.
@@NamTran-xc2ip Yes. The enviroment of the 90s, the velocity of the courts and tradition did forced him to play one hander, as 80% of the players of the time. Sampras started playing with two hands because he was so weak but was told to switch to one hand so he could win major titles as the courts were faster and that way he could be more aggressive and coud attack the net. So he won 5 ATP Finals, 7 Wimbledons and 5 United States Opens and was # 1 for six straight years in the 90s. If courts had stayed the same (as they were for 120 years) neither Nadal or Djokovic could have won more than 8 majors at best.
@@rebecalinares5393 Then how come Agassi and many others use 2 hands? Sorry but federer himself benefit from slower courts compared to the 80s. You fedfans are honestly next level delusional.
This was the match Djokovics Nutritionist said he had celiac disease before the match. Makes sense because ever since he lost the final to nadal at this year. He went on to became the goat
much better? It seems a bit exaggerated to me, let's say that in terms of numbers and statistics Djokovic is the best but it's not that Federer's numbers suck. It's absurd how you always have to denigrate one over another. you are ridiculous and disappointing.
Impressive how Djokovic was far from his prime, far from the level he was able to achieve in 2011 and subsequent years, and still was able to beat a 29 year old federer
what about 2008 with brutal loss at Wimbledon to nadal, 2009 loss at Australian Open final to nadal, 2009 us open final loss to juan martin del potro, and this 2010 loss to nole at us open, your gonna sit there and claim fed was past his prime? c'mon................ no one believes that,, admit it, the competition caught up to him!
More like prime competition (2010-2019) with Novak peaking into his beast mode, Murray hitting his prime, Stan & Del Potro being at their best. Suddenly, it wasn't just Nadal causing him a problem. The aura of invincibility of Fedal was broken.
first chapter of the 40-15 trilogy, of course they screwed Nole by making him play sf on Saturday he was then easy prey for Nadal in the final on sunday , at this point Nole was 15 slams behind Roger and 13 years later he would have 4 more than Roger 😅😅😅
To all those who think that roger is mentally fragile of the big 3 he was ahead for most of the match whereas Novak was playing catch up, and had to produce good tennis when it mattered ..if you look at the stats roger had to come back many times from 2 sets down to win a match in his entire career than Novak had done...and also in all the matches us open 2010 11 and wimby 19 he was the leader of grand slam count and never would have considered those matches a must win whereas for Novak these matches were must win..and he had to produce good tennis when it mattered ..he might be mentally strong as the situation demanded him to win at all cost ..roger was used to winning the championship matches in 4 sets all his career..that doesn't make him mentally fragile
Being ahead in the match is not relevant to fragile mentality. Federer won more matches (20) being matchpoint down, but he also lost more (24). Novak lost 3, Nadal 8 and Novak won at least 4, in the biggest ,moments. Just accept reality that Novak, Rafa are a step above Federer in the mental game.
thats understandable considering u cant show the match points because djokovic produced stunning tennis to outplay roger on those points. so in order to unfairly claim that roger had this match on his racquet u came up with a lame excuse from another point.
look dude. Its pretty bvious that dominic Thiem is the GOAT. Like are you speicial? Dominic thiem reached 5 gs in the strongest era of eras ever. Federe, nadal novak juan sinner, medvedev, zverev. He has beaten two big players novak and nadal in semi fnials and just came short of winning the RG. I hate you guys with your dumb arguments and shit. he is the fastest pacer and biggest hitter and at 30 is still around even with a wrist injury. Prime novak beaten by domi and fed beaten by him on his own hard court surface. the ratios point towards the austrian
But that's why/where Federer, the most stylish and aggressive attacking player, lost out. He won most of his duels against his greatest rivals like Rafa & Nole during the early years (2006-2010) because he dictated the play. But they, especially Novak, turned up their defensive game and also attack, Federer began to falter/fail.
@@X6593precisely. One thing noted here is that, from the middle of the court or on the left side of the court Novak uses his forehand alot more in pressure points instead of his backhand. So brave with his attack
look dude. Its pretty bvious that dominic Thiem is the GOAT. Like are you speicial? Dominic thiem reached 5 gs in the strongest era of eras ever. Federe, nadal novak juan sinner, medvedev, zverev. He has beaten two big players novak and nadal in semi fnials and just came short of winning the RG. I hate you guys with your dumb arguments and shit. he is the fastest pacer and biggest hitter and at 30 is still around even with a wrist injury. Prime novak beaten by domi and fed beaten by him on his own hard court surface. the ratios point towards the austrian
My Other Channels:
ruclips.net/channel/UCI06Kdk5Gp67dsgrdbh8lLA
ruclips.net/channel/UCyJaQIf2CnXT0jELkPeO4CQ
No copyright is intended, all rights go to its respective owners!
We lived in quite remarkable era of tennis with everything set in the best possible and fairest way.
Imagine if Federer had two handed backhand or if there are two major on clay or Novak didn't have those early fitness problems or if anyone of them was in different era, things could have been vastly different.
So anyone could be your GOAT but they made this era as GOAT's era.
I can imagine that. Or if Nadal didn't have his foot issues or numerous injuries as well.
Imagine if Federer had NEO backhand and heavier racquet earlier when he was younger...
If Fedal fanboys could actually take an l like men, then they wouldn't be fangirls instead 🤣🤣
There is no thing as "your GOAT". Stats say that Djokovic is clearly the greatest tennis player of all time. Not just by GS count. But most major records he is either number one or 2 with few exceptions. 1) Djokovic 2) Federer 3) Nadal. Facts don't care for your feelings unfortunately
@@HalaMadrid15UCL As a hardcore djokovic fan, I do think that the question of " if Federer had a two handed backhand " is legitimate, since one handed backhand is so much inferior for morphological reasons.
We will never know of course
These two GOATS are heavy hitters. Still playing at a very HIGH LEVEL way deep in the 5th set! Even though this was in 2010, this highlight is way better than ay highlights we have in year 2023!!!!Today's players lack that endurance and grit!
Both all-time greats but only one GOAT. It doesn’t even make sense when you say “these two greatest of all time are heavy hitters”…
@@tolendoi123no I’m with him. The big 3 reigned for nearly 20 years. They are the goats. Djokovic has 2 more than Nadal and 4 more than Federer. If you look past them the next guy is Pete Sampras who is at 14, not even in the 20 range
@@giansaccount NO mate, Novak is the GOAT.
Stop this nonsence. Its not just Gran Slams. ALL records holds Djokovic.
Just stop, its enouh.
@@milanm403Nah I agree with him
Its goats @@milanm403
I feel like Federer actually played better in this match than in the 07, 08, 09, 11, 15 matches but it’s just that this was the most confident and free-swinging Djokovic had ever been in his career up to that point
11 Nole is more confident, Federer's level from 07-11 were similar. You can make a case for any of these years to be the best USO version.
In 11 Federer play better than 10
as a federer fan this match was amazing because of the time difference I remember watching it very late in night not sleeping as a kid in a dark room trying to not make noise and wake up mom and dad like while watching such a high quality roller coaster of ball striking it was crazy
Can watch this match time and time again... every half a year or so. Just the first minute and a half already, brutal Federer offensive tennis/striking.
Miss this rivalry fr
@@KunnuITF absolutely, beautiful clash of contrasts.
Federer at his absolute best: pure demolition (almost as perfect as the match against djokovic in us open 2009)
@@Luchon20082010He suddenly wasnt at his best anymore when he lost, was he 😂😂.
@@TheRafaelBondbro, he lost
Your highlights are magnificent especially this old games where normally the quality and length of the other highlights is pretty bad and lackluster while yours are incredibly detailed to a point that it seems I´m watching the game live keep up the excellent work.
Thanks!!
Its the moments that get away from Federer. Time and time again. Start of the 2nd set. 40-15 serving for 1-1. He ends up getting broken and the set goes quickly. Rafa and Novak are simply far more clinical. Roger playing a flat 2nd set cost him dearly. At the end so many of his decisions were so off. God i loved him, but his defeats were always so damn painful/avoidable. This match changed the rivalry forever. What a tennis match though. The rallies and movement are just phenomenal. Djokovic got the perfect tennis schooling. Constantly having to go up against Fed and Nadal in major semis/finals. What hes done in surpassing them both is incredible. Djokovic celebration was so cool at the end.
It was a problem from the start of the season 2010. But it is what it is. Roger was an amazing player and the most beatiful to watch. These loses doesn`t matter now.
@@Sammy-mz3rithey matter. He's have definitely won more GS. Maybe 25. Had he been more clinical.
It's funny because his celebration is similar to the one after the Olympic final.
He celebrated like that cause he knows he just beat the greatest talent of all time..If there were 1000 tournaments on grass and less clay and hard Fed would of been #1 in world more often than Novak. He was seeded 2 and Nadal 1 because Nadal accumulated many points months prior winning 1000 clay tournaments and FO.
@@alfonsonapoletano4522 if if if
Djokovic is a psychological beast. His mental game is unmatched thus far.
he sell that idea, but he is not really! every player at the top needs to be really mentally though! and he did invent anything! he is just to much vocal about it!
Sinner will match it
@@MistahhMingus😂🤣😁😄😃😀😅
the match that changed tennis history forever.
Federer's forehand was more lethal in 2010 compared to 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2019
@@sawgames8623 It was clearly more lethal here, Slower courts and age made the shot less potent.
@@sawgames8623 Blind guy
@@sawgames8623federer fh speed literally decreased but sure
The court speed slowed overtime, and his footwork decreased due to age. Also, something I didn't realize is that the 85 and 90 square inch heads allowed him to whip the forehand through the air much faster than his 97. I'm not exactly sure why. Could be age, and a smaller head size means less mass to swing. That's probably why with the new RF 01 he tried to replicate that.
@@TheGodsMustBeCrazy So true, the bigger raquet made his forehand suffer a lot, but helped his backhand; That is why with 97 he had more success against Nadal by improving his backhand, but on the other hand he ruined his chances against Novak, where his forehand was what made him competitive against Novak before.
That is to say, what helped him on the one hand, hurt him on the other.
Federer's forehand in the '19 Wimbledon finals was not even 50% of what it was with the racket 85, 90
5th is one of the best sets ever played at USO
I remember being such a fed fan at this point! but at the end, I was really happy for novak! and happy for Roger as well! one more time he proves that you had to go to 5 sets to win him! so he play really well!
Djocovik is the only 2hbh player that I really enjoy watching playing. His mind is incredible.
Pazzeschi entrambi e mai un errore nei servizi,nelle risposte....l' evoluzione perfetta degli anni 70/80/90/2000..... meravigliosi
32:17
Damn that fed inside out was clean
Looking back, it's kind of surprised that Novak's backhand was kind of weak at this stage. He couldn't control Roger's backhand with cross-court shot from his own backhand, which was basically his biggest advantage in their matches since 2011.
Those two match points shake the federer confidence
I say as a Federer fan; that fifth set is one of the best ever played
Personally both players played better in 2011
@@vijayla212011 more dramatic, 2010 better played
Et aujourd'hui Djokovic est toujours là et continu à brisé la concurrence ❤
absolutely prime Fed, crisp, deep and accurate hit. the best.
And lost 😂😂
@@HalaMadrid15UCLwhy the negativity?
Find it hard to believe even today that Federer-Nadal never faced each other in USO
Novak only smashed Federer in the semis not Nadal. I believe Nadal leads 2-1 in their H2H in US open, with the same amount of wins too.😂
That never happened because tankerer tanked against robredo
@@mastershake886 How about in 2015 when nadal lost to Fognini?
Imponente el nivel de este legendario partido.
Federer sacaba y pegaba con un 🔨 y #djokovic hacía lo mismo y se contorsionaba como si fuera el hombre elástico, vamos de cómic.
Aquí subió al #olimpo del tenus el serbio, especialmente en el 5° set con 5-4 en contra y remontando (con su enorme juego) 2 ó 3 bolas de partido.
Majestuoso.
Masterpiece match by Djoker and Roger in 5 sets. The pinnacle of tennis on hardcourt.
Federer tinha somente um adversário, Nadal, ate chegar Novak, que mostrou a ele como ser o goat.
Tennis came so naturally to Roger, he was the most mentally fragile among big 3.
Look at Novak's reaction. He was prepared to die there
The fact that the other 2 were mental monsters doesnt mean Federer was "fragile". Couldnt have won 20 slams with a "fragile" head.
What would Sampras, Laver or Borg be then? mentally retarded?
Watching the 2 first sets, you might think Roger is leading, he's better, but again, Novak found a way..
federer forehand here was so on , the backhand was weak thats why i wasnt so disapointed he lost because Nadal would have beaten him in the final
Federer's forehand was more lethal in 2010 compared to 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2019
Federer´s backhand was never "weak"; the one handed backhand is the toughest shot in tennis, its never gonna be as consistent as a two hander, where you have the help of the two arms holding and directing the ball.
@@rebecalinares5393 Is that supposed to be an excuse? Nobody forced him to use a onehander.
@@NamTran-xc2ip Yes. The enviroment of the 90s, the velocity of the courts and tradition did forced him to play one hander, as 80% of the players of the time.
Sampras started playing with two hands because he was so weak but was told to switch to one hand so he could win major titles as the courts were faster and that way he could be more aggressive and coud attack the net. So he won 5 ATP Finals, 7 Wimbledons and 5 United States Opens and was # 1 for six straight years in the 90s.
If courts had stayed the same (as they were for 120 years) neither Nadal or Djokovic could have won more than 8 majors at best.
@@rebecalinares5393 Then how come Agassi and many others use 2 hands? Sorry but federer himself benefit from slower courts compared to the 80s. You fedfans are honestly next level delusional.
This was the match Djokovics Nutritionist said he had celiac disease before the match. Makes sense because ever since he lost the final to nadal at this year. He went on to became the goat
No it was against Tsonga at AO earlier that year
more like he started taking PEDs.
his backhand just let him down against djok & nadal smh. or else it would’ve been a routine straight set win in most slams
Federer serve is much better than novak., But djok won in the end. U could see how good he was
First point of the match! 😮
16:12 simply amazing , can’t see this move now
Djokovic was 🔥.
He is far better than the Fed and that's the reason why they hate him.
Love ❤ you Nole
much better? It seems a bit exaggerated to me, let's say that in terms of numbers and statistics Djokovic is the best but it's not that Federer's numbers suck. It's absurd how you always have to denigrate one over another. you are ridiculous and disappointing.
Far better? No. Not statistical head to head
This is a WAR
Great match from Djokovic!
Impressive how Djokovic was far from his prime, far from the level he was able to achieve in 2011 and subsequent years, and still was able to beat a 29 year old federer
Unbelievable how many won matches Roger left to Novak. Nevertheless, he will be the undisputed GOAT for a long time.
He already isn't lol
he is the undisputed GOAT of choking
He is the third.
The man who invented tennis. The others are just following
@@andreaeffe75 he invented the term 40-15 in tennis, but no one has followed, maybe Zverev.
The beginning of 40-15
I love it.... 40:15 complex is one of the best in the sport history.
Beautiful.
33:44
Tennis lessons of how to overcome two RF match points in the fifth set ...and playing absolutely offensive
NDjo 🎾🎖️👌🏼
Even if Roger had pulled off this one, I had no expectations of him winning this GS....because in 2010, Rafa was in top form.
Only one GOAT Novak 🔥🔥🔥
"Federer's decline started in 2010."
Yeah, right.
It did lol. He was never the same after 2010. He had his spurts but prime Federer ended in 2010. 2010 AO final was prime Federer's last performance.
@@TheGodsMustBeCrazy It ended at the 2009 US Open.
He played a different game at the AO in 2010.
what about 2008 with brutal loss at Wimbledon to nadal, 2009 loss at Australian Open final to nadal, 2009 us open final loss to juan martin del potro, and this 2010 loss to nole at us open, your gonna sit there and claim fed was past his prime? c'mon................ no one believes that,, admit it, the competition caught up to him!
@@Marko777ify Maybe. But I think that AO final was prime Federer returning just for a spurt. He was never the same after that unfortunately.
More like prime competition (2010-2019) with Novak peaking into his beast mode, Murray hitting his prime, Stan & Del Potro being at their best. Suddenly, it wasn't just Nadal causing him a problem. The aura of invincibility of Fedal was broken.
38:18 terrible error de Federer en un punto casi ganado
If novak had crowd in his side he would have won these matches in straight sets
first chapter of the 40-15 trilogy, of course they screwed Nole by making him play sf on Saturday he was then easy prey for Nadal in the final on sunday , at this point Nole was 15 slams behind Roger and 13 years later he would have 4 more than Roger 😅😅😅
Rafa had the semis on the same day as well
Even if Fed had won this Rafa would have got him in the final.
Agreed, 2011 would’ve been more of a toss up
Nadal told you that ? Tony Nadal told you that ?
@@KunnuITF You mean ball toss ?
no
@@AlanGoswami-nz9lg😂😂😂 meaning it can go any way 50-50 chance for fed and nadal to take 2011
Majstorej To je To Borba i 1cm levo ,desno i opet mi Srbija prjava Svet odakle Smo...❤❤❤
Federer the GOAT with the backhand of 2017 wouldhave been the GOD of tennis.
Federer is not the GOAT. Stop living in fantasy world
2010 Nadal would smack him
@@menon_ji4984lmao Djokovic isn’t the GOAT clown fed is
To all those who think that roger is mentally fragile of the big 3 he was ahead for most of the match whereas Novak was playing catch up, and had to produce good tennis when it mattered ..if you look at the stats roger had to come back many times from 2 sets down to win a match in his entire career than Novak had done...and also in all the matches us open 2010 11 and wimby 19 he was the leader of grand slam count and never would have considered those matches a must win whereas for Novak these matches were must win..and he had to produce good tennis when it mattered ..he might be mentally strong as the situation demanded him to win at all cost ..roger was used to winning the championship matches in 4 sets all his career..that doesn't make him mentally fragile
Being ahead in the match is not relevant to fragile mentality. Federer won more matches (20) being matchpoint down, but he also lost more (24). Novak lost 3, Nadal 8 and Novak won at least 4, in the biggest ,moments. Just accept reality that Novak, Rafa are a step above Federer in the mental game.
38:07 the most costly decision ever!
McEnroe;"he is /Fed/ a great volleyer like Nadal" makes you shake your head thinking what's he talking about
Nadal is a great volleyer
Lmao nadal's volley is one of the best ever. Hardly misses
Does McEnroe realize now what he said ? When Djokovic won both the commentators were stunned and silent. I bet they lost the bet big time.
32:34 I know he had match points after that but feels like this was a dicisive miss
thats understandable considering u cant show the match points because djokovic produced stunning tennis to outplay roger on those points. so in order to unfairly claim that roger had this match on his racquet u came up with a lame excuse from another point.
@@h4rder10 . I didnt claim shit, just said that was a big miss. Now get out of here with your snide insinuations
How does this Djokovic compare to Djokovic today and still beat Federer.
So this 5 set match took less time than the 2023 3 set Cincinati final 😂😂
One of their worst matches of all time .... I regretted that I watched this match live... makes me dizzy thinking about that
Worst?
@@cesar5665 ya. I watched this match live.. so many errors from both players. Only last set has some good level otherwise it's too bad.
184-6 record after winning 1st set in grand slams 05aus 06fre 09us 10fre what is other two?
Its my idea, or the court was a lot faster then ?
courts have slowed down mostly over time so yes
@@KunnuITF Is a shame, with this speed you can see a more agressive game, is very different from now.
Wow I think I thought I saw a Novax fan!
Y después tengo que escuchar que Novak 2023 juega mejor que este Novak 🥱😂
Absolutamente
💙💙💙💙😍😍😍😍😍
look dude. Its pretty bvious that dominic Thiem is the GOAT. Like are you speicial? Dominic thiem reached 5 gs in the strongest era of eras ever. Federe, nadal novak juan sinner, medvedev, zverev. He has beaten two big players novak and nadal in semi fnials and just came short of winning the RG. I hate you guys with your dumb arguments and shit. he is the fastest pacer and biggest hitter and at 30 is still around even with a wrist injury. Prime novak beaten by domi and fed beaten by him on his own hard court surface. the ratios point towards the austrian
This match was the beginning of Djokovic's supremacy.
Did Federer avoid Nadal on purpose?
Who knows but Nadal does avoid Djokovic outside clay
37:00 22.10.23.
Federer丶 Djoko之爭後期處於下方因差6歲！ Dj Oko 已無來者！Federer己無古人
Defensive play is not entertaining.
But that's why/where Federer, the most stylish and aggressive attacking player, lost out. He won most of his duels against his greatest rivals like Rafa & Nole during the early years (2006-2010) because he dictated the play. But they, especially Novak, turned up their defensive game and also attack, Federer began to falter/fail.
Federer's game is not so entertaining too
It was my view .you must be enjoying long rallies.I enjoy short clever points.
@@X6593precisely. One thing noted here is that, from the middle of the court or on the left side of the court Novak uses his forehand alot more in pressure points instead of his backhand. So brave with his attack
@@andreten4780 his flexibility is also on the fleek!
novak the sped special diet abuserisng fake goat. Domi thiem will always be considered the GOAT since the start
Nadal a volleyer ? Think again you McEnroe, you should know better than that.
That McEnroe is biased; he was looking for Federer/Nadal final. Eat your words now.
Get a job uncle
Both the commentators wrote off Djokovic, and Djokovic broke Federer to pieces.....6 times.
In those match point he should have come front
Beautiful.
look dude. Its pretty bvious that dominic Thiem is the GOAT. Like are you speicial? Dominic thiem reached 5 gs in the strongest era of eras ever. Federe, nadal novak juan sinner, medvedev, zverev. He has beaten two big players novak and nadal in semi fnials and just came short of winning the RG. I hate you guys with your dumb arguments and shit. he is the fastest pacer and biggest hitter and at 30 is still around even with a wrist injury. Prime novak beaten by domi and fed beaten by him on his own hard court surface. the ratios point towards the austrian