The NF 2.5-10X42 has parallax adj but it's 2FP. At least the math is easy at 2.5x and 5x. Every time scope makes come just to the edge of what a 2.5-10 scope should be, then take away a critical function. Why???
@@jugi2890 how's that? I shoot mine from 10 yard out 1150. Most parallax is 25 to 500 which is the infinite. Strictly using it for wind reading/ vapor trail in high mag?
When will they be available?
I wonder when they will be available?
Previous Mark 5hd glass wasnt that impressive VS some closer $$$ competitors..... What makes this Mark4 better? Or is it ?
I’d like a vx4.
More options the better.
2.5-10 models don’t have adjustable parallax. So close yet again Leupold…
Insert sad trombone sound...
The NF 2.5-10X42 has parallax adj but it's 2FP. At least the math is easy at 2.5x and 5x. Every time scope makes come just to the edge of what a 2.5-10 scope should be, then take away a critical function. Why???
10x doesnt need one, thats why
@@jugi2890 how's that? I shoot mine from 10 yard out 1150. Most parallax is 25 to 500 which is the infinite. Strictly using it for wind reading/ vapor trail in high mag?
@@user-jv4ic8rh4d another man of culture who feels my pain. 👍🏻
Made in USA???
Home run!
Would have rather had a Mark 6 or 8
If it holds zero better than the mk5s they have a winner.
Sounds like you've got some bad scopes
Came here to see if anyone else felt the same way.
Yeah wasn’t happy with the zero problem or Leupold’s CS.
Still american made?
Yes. American made.
Can't wait for the 2.5-10x42. Sounds like a good one for my m5
So a basically a more budget friendly mk5 hd
holy shit it has the q97 bz 245 x1 super dupper turret got to have it
Mark 4HD ≠ Mark 4
Made in China??
No, USA
@@DV-cm3tbhow much