Peter Hitchens: If Keir Starmer becomes PM, we'll look at Boris Johnson years as a "golden age"
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 фев 2025
- Peter Hitchens says if Keir Starmer becomes PM, we'll look back at Boris Johnson's years as a "golden age" of politics.
#mikegraham #peterhitchens
Watch talkRADIO TV's Political Punch Up / @therepublicofmikegraham
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
www.nhsvaccine...
www.who.int/em...
We are between a rock and a hard place, as ever. We don’t want Labour or Conservatives.
The Boomers will ensure the latter are voted in.
@@Vintagenose But they are infiltrated by communists. There are some true conservatives in there, but there are a bunch of imposters in there as well. If we vote for the imposters we get communists and if Labour win those seats then we get communists. Either there is a true conservative leader saves the party, or the true conservatives leave for a new alternative party where they can make a stand. To save the party, firstly there has to be a true conservative leader, and second, there have to be enough true conservatives to vote in that leadership candidate. Can those two conditions be met?
No, we don’t want Labour, Lib Dums or SNP.
@@Vintagenose labour aren't communist
We need to get behind Lawrence Fox's party.
Peter Hitchens prophetic as ever
Still no one mentions that Keir Starmer is a member of the Trilateral Commission, and dystopian future that this organisation stands for.
Maybe because nobody knows what it is? And it's not clear how it could lead to the dystopia that you suggest.
Glyn Richards - What's the Trilateral Commission then? 🙄 I've never heard of it, please educate me.
Cons have endorsed the trans humanist 4th industrial revolution too
The right are so sadly indoctrinated.
@@harryherman5371 haha you're joking right? Where would they be indoctrinated? In Liberal controlled schools or the 24/7 left media coverage?
Peter’s words scare me more than the pandemic ever did. We’re heading for terrifying times
That’s because people like you unfortunately aren’t very intelligent or educated 🙄
Nigel Farage and Richard Tice also want electoral reform and PR. Would it scare you less to hear either of them making the case for it?
@@markmoran916 😂
@@jackrabbitism no
@@markmoran916 in that crystal ball you got there any insights into next fridays lottery numbers
keir johnson
boris starmer
doesn't make a difference.
establishment mouthpieces
People wanted to punch the establishment in the face so they voted for Brexit the thing that off shore billionaires and Russia wanted. Then they followed it up by voting in one of the biggest establishment figures in Borris Johnson. The liar who keeps on lying because his dumb fans believe his lies. This country has become a joke.
@@whatsreallyhappening5669 If Boris was an establishment figure then the MSM wouldn't be going after him.
@@agt155 don’t you get internet where you are? Are you serious? Your a funny guy. Maybe broaden your horizons a little and stop listening to so much right wing propaganda
@@whatsreallyhappening5669 You've been brainwashed into thinking Boris' birthday cake is a big story. Don't listen to legacy media.
@@agt155 it’s all about what you think is the bare minimum for a leader. If you think a lier who can’t be trusted is the right man for the job then I have to worry about what you want for the future of this country.
Support for truckers worldwide it's great to see the freedom movement gathering pace worldwide we all know who will be on the right and wrong side of history for years to come.
As long as we name and shame every politician in favour of this dystopian control.
Freedom to do what? Explain.
@@geraldbutler5484 to live our normal lives without having to wear masks, be forced to take vaccines or have to endure more lockdowns. Basically have live as it was pre-COVID.
@@montyburnsgaming3609 what percent of the Canadian population is vaccinated?
@@fracktar Not as high as Australia but better than the pathetic US
Why should i vote for either of the parties, None of them have my interests at heart or my community.
@@Craig121000 If your a true labour supporter you should vote SDP
Unless your a metropolitan bourgeoisie sort 🤷♂️
Stop being tribal
@@Craig121000 If you wish, I just can't find any real reason to support either of them.
@@Craig121000 WILL BE ON THE LOSING ASIDE AGAIN THEN Gammon
@@millwallholdings I wouldn't say the conservatives are winners unless the destruction of the country is your thing, they're both globalist UK hating partys
I will be retiring from voting within the next two elections after a lifetime of voting and believing, might as well have carried on believing in Santa for all the difference its made. Reform will get my last votes from now on as I see no future with LibLabCon they have all wrecked the country and aren't working for any of us ordinary folk.
To be honest, I have stopped caring! The fact is that until the people of this country are forced to stare down at the abyss, they will never wake up. I will soon be dead and gone. Good luck everybody.
How do you think people like me feel, 24 years old and fully awake, I’ve got a long time to go before I’m dead (unless something terrible happens to me).
@@montyburnsgaming3609
My heart truly goes out to you. I have two kids. 25 and 29 yrs old. To be young and 'awake' is the worst of all. I hope that all young people can find some peace and acceptance in the knowledge that they have been betrayed by their parents and grandparents generations. Not on purpose i am sure but distracted and fooled onto believing lies. By being afraid to stand up for what we knew was true and good. By being lazy and too often taking the path of least resistance. Peace and acceptance is all I can hope for the British youth of the 21st century.
I understand. I read Hitchens piece. It's not only be careful what you wish for. Be extremely careful. Not only Starmer but another conservative leader. If we think it's bad now!
Any animal that considers the farmer to be its friend ends up on his plate.
@Neria Wolf And the nicer, the better!
Really is fascinating watching the tribalism on here
Until people stop voting for the current parties then nothing will change
Don’t you get it
They care about their own survival not you !
Although I agree , the system is rigged in favour of the two main parties. I don't see that changing in what's left of my lifetime.
Conservative power. Never Labour. Labour as a Party will die first.
@@paulamos8781 they are the same party
Peter and Mike are the centre of common sense.
They All need to go.
It funny how Peter doesn't seem to connect the dots to things like how this is globalised, the WEF and digital IDs.
Yes, he doesen't think that world government through the back is possible, that's the problem with Peter, he is also something of a relic in thinking politics have some relation to the politics of the past as regard Britain. Times have savagely changed, there are zero, zilch, nana pollies who even care about democracy, only self serving agrandisement and financial gain, monetarily or in resource. They're all useful idiots serving a disgusting NWO scam!
@@iclaudius148 I disagree, Peter is gloomy and a bit of a Jeremiah, but whilst he has already written a book of lamentations, I would not describe him as a weeping prophet. More so... he is a frustrated Puritan.
I totally agree with Mike about Steve Baker . I like him and he would make an excellent PM given the opportunity . I, also agree with him about Sunak, Truss and Gove who wouldn’t be any better than Boris and in the case of Gove he would be absolutely Terrible to say the least . He’s a Miserable Man !!
I agree, however, I don't think Steve Baker would be able to get the support. The only man I think would do the best job is Andrew Bridgen as he isn't a carer politian, has been successful in business and seems to hit the pulse every time when he speaks.
@@Candolad Andrew Bridgen!Well, he's as thick as two short planks, so no wonder he hits you, or your pulse, or whatever (I'm not sure of your sex), so smartly and successfully. And Tina has the hots for Steve Baker, who like Peter Hitchens or Piers Corbyn enjoys the attention the English are happy to gove to a self-proclaimed eccentric, however foolish. Ah, sorry, a misspelling - 'give' not 'gove' - and particularly not 'Gove' spelled with a capital 'T' for 'terrible', just like Tina, who seems to like capital letters and mediaevalism: the 'Miserable Man' that is Gove - it's like something out of a morality play.
@@Candolad I personally think, if Starmer gets in, his opposite number should be a proper conservative Tory. Any of the following would do: Andrew Bridgen, Graham Brady, Chris Green, Tim Loughton or Philip Hollobone. Desmond Swayne is too full of himself, William Wragg is probably too young (he should be a minister though) and IDS, David Davis and Redwood will probably all be standing down in '24.
So true. The country's already screwed as it is anyway. We need a Britain First party to save the nation.
I mean Hitchens suggesting that no right wing government could ever win under pr seems to suggest that he thinks no country could possibly have a majority of conservative people- I think that betrays a lot...
Yes Peter, Boris will be remembered but it won't be fondly.
According to Peter Hitchens anybody who has brain, courage, and decency is a lefty, because he clearly lacks those qualities himself, and despises the people who don't lack those qualities- totally the opposite of his brother actually, who was one of the bravest most intelligent, and super decent people that I can think of. Obviously calling people lefty in right wing cesspit circles that he tries to get credibility in, is a winning strategy for him- and that's how low he's sunk- or is it that he's always been down there? I can't be sure now!
Keep the toff Tories in sums up this country 😂🤣
Be careful what you wish for twat..the metropolitan royalty that run the working class labour party will be far worse.
Voting Tory for anyone but the rich is self harming.
@@stevespiers9120 Exactly.
YEAH LETS GET THE MILLIONAIRES AND A POSHO IN FROM THE LABOUR PARTY. SUMS YOUR TYPE UP 🤣🤣🤣
@@millwallholdings "Happy Fish" sums up yours 😂
Expanding on the grocery analogy, they would change what you put on the list. Meat would be replaced with lentils and sprouts. Then they would take 80% .
If PR results in left of centre governments what do you understand by that Peter?
Sir Kier is 10x worse than Boris
Because...
Blairs stooges party should never hold power again....
There's not going to be 10 years of Starmer whichever way you look at it.
@Jo Bloggs
No matter who runs the country Labour or Tories, both useless.
@Jo Bloggs He is a strong critic of most of the so called Conservative party
Don't let the over 2000 food banks, universal credit, bedroom tax, billions wasted on unfit for use PPE and a useless track and trace system, national rise.... since the toff Tories came to power put you off voting for them again! 🤣
@@Silver-st2zq To a Tory that's almost the definition of progress. It's good ol' character building.
🤷♂️🤷♂️🥴
The fervor for independence in Scotland has waned dramatically over the last 4 years since Sturgeon has introduced some of the most draconian measures ever proposed in the UK! The free speech bill will have repercussions at the next election even from the very young who have been constantly lied to by this SNP administration!
As for a Boris replacement there are two who I would be happy to see in No 10. David Davis or Ian Duncan Smith! As both have had senior ministerial posts and have the temperament to hold the post of PM with dignity!
👍definetly. We would be sorry if we were under starmer or sturgeon here in Scotland
Why have Peter on. All is doom and gloom with him. He has given up and spreading his hopelessness everywhere which is not helpful. I will never give up on freedom. No-one has the right to give me permission on how to live my life. Politicians need to be reminded they are there to serve us not to rule over us. As for the elite they need to be reminded that they are a very small minority so have no power over us.
Well good luck with stopping politicians telling you how to live your life.
Well you’re not going to be able to prepare or be well-advised or even understand your adversaries and the extent of their power if some starry-eyed optimist spews incessant sparkles and stickers and downplays the danger, are you? And I’m not yet aware that Hitchens has ever been proven wrong . . .
"no power over us" is this figurative or do you mean they actually have no power, in which case they do because we live in a society of laws.
Listen to Peter and you will learn, if you want to.
I prefer an incompetent dictator to a competent one.
“I told you so,” boasts Mr. Hitchens, regarding some plan he had in 2010 that no one I was interested in. Interestingly, last week Mr. Hitchens made the comment that: “unfortunately most people just like being able to say ‘I told you so!’ It’s sad but true,” he said. He seems to have a feeble lack of self awareness.
@Michael Parkinson Sure I can because when he said “most people” he did so with a sneer and it was in the context of dismissing “most people” as gullible and foolish. The whole talking point at the time was about how “most people” don’t mind what’s going on as long as they can say “told you so.” He spent 20 years decrying freedom of movement yet after the Brexit vote spent months hammering on about how we should stay in the single market. He has a feeble lack of self awareness.
@@jackrabbitism He didn't say “most people” don’t mind what’s going on as long as they can say “told you so.” He said “most people” like being told what to do - HE likes telling them, 'I told you so'. Most people have been gullible and foolish in the last two years and they deserve to be sneered at.
But was he really wrong? The Cameron government and the coalition was a complete disaster, weather or not you’re referring to the overt broken promises relating to fees or its foreign policy
@@Ruda-n4h He did say “most people like being told what to do.” That’s true. And he loves telling people “I told you so.” That’s true too. And he did indeed also say “most people like saying I told you so. Sad but true.” But why in the world would you think most people deserve to be sneered at? Said the Bard: “More fool you.”
@@jackrabbitism People following the restrictions we've had for a virus that doesn't adversely affect 99% of people - not very clever, they deserve to be sneered at.
Always interested to hear Peter, but I think he underestimates the positive changes PR could bring.
There is unlikely to be a unified left or unified right under PR, it's more likely to mean a return to the centre. (Assuming the Tories haven't wiped out the middle class in the interim). Would also remove the imbalance that extremist factions like the ERG have been able to exploit.
More coalitions = more representative democracy.
And hopefully, elimination of the elected autocrat approach we have now, although there are cultural factors involved as far as UK is concerned, including the class system.
It's probably too late to stop now, but PR would have been much more likely to preserve the Union.
PR just means that the coalitions form after the vote, rather than into parties before the vote as we have now. And that means you have no idea what you are voting for.
Such naivety in that country. The last referendum was clearly (for those willing to study) fixed, Cameron (the PM to lose Scotland?!!!) and Queen saw to that. Scots abroad could not even register their vote!!! Poles, Nigerians in Scotland could. As Stalin said, it is not important who you vote for, that's just an opinion, what's important is who counts the vote. QED
By people abroad are you referring to those of us still in the U.K. ? Or only those who have left the U.K. !! 500,000 Scot’s living in Wales England Ireland couldn’t vote either ,, WHY because we would have voted in favour of the union ,, the SNP or to be fair most political parties are only interested in winning , not democracy ,
@@earlcollins9310 Hence why the SNP are so keen on extending the vote to the young and promoting policies such as free bus travel for the under 22's.
@@acm1137 it beggar beliefs that u can vote at 14 and at the same time they are looking into raising the age of criminal responsibility to 26
@@acm1137 Don't forget the SNP even allowed refugees to vote in the local and Scottish parliamentary elections in other words someone who could have come to the country illegally was give the option to vote in Scotland if you can believe that.
@@charliezz6746 There were recently rather ugly scenes where a mob of far-Left types accosted Home Office staff who were trying to legally remove people from an address in Glasgow.
I miss Christopher 😭
RIP Christopher Lee
It has been suggested that the Labour Party could form a coalition with the SNP to gain power in Westminster. The SNP doesn’t represent anyone outside Scotland, therefore it cannot be a viable proposal.
And the SNP despise Labour almost as much as the Conservatives.
@@acm1137 - to be fair, the SNP seems to despise literally everything in all creation.
oh yes they can where in the law does it say they cannot, but you seem to know so show me where it says they cannot then
No real difference to when Gordon Brown was PM and could make decisions on English health and education, when no one in England could vote for him as an MP.
Labour would offer the SNP another referendum on independence. If they voted out then Labour would need to look at ways of retaining power without the SNP, such as allowing 16 year olds to vote (as they've done in Wales).
"Proportional representation will be very bad because it will lead directly to people getting what they vote for"
And no decisions will ever be made; no decisive action ever taken!
@@jallan9578 so business as usual then
And let's not forget that Liebour wanting to lower the voting age to 16, just like squatters in a multi story building, once in they will be extremely difficult to get out.
I imagine that you are rather difficult to get out of your noisome little lair.
Grown any concrete lately Mike!
The Johnson years are mostly pre Brexit.
So Hitchens is absolutely right.
Pre Brexit not pro Brexit, he is systematically destroying Brexit. BRINO.
Hitchens is a paper tiger.
Hitchens is hated by all. He has lots of opinions and not a single fact.
Starmer: a multimillionaire middle class left wing politician, just think of a woke government. We have to watch what we say all the time as it is without being under a labour oppression. They’re not labour anymore they are something completely different
If you’re trying to portray Keir Starmer as an elitist I’ve got news for you. Every PM is elitist. Boris Johnson and David Cameron both attended Oxford and Eton. Cameron and Johnson have caused more damage to The UK than any leader in recent history - Cameron for calling a ridiculous vote and Johnson for leading a propaganda Brexit campaign. Let’s also not forget the pedantic and inept Theresa May - she had no obligation whatsoever to go ahead with the disastrous result of a referendum that was ill timed - as a distraction for his unpopularity and to appease the right wing of the party - and voted by a mostly uninformed public. The next day, the most popular google search was “What does it mean to leave The EU” and “WHAT IS THE EU”
@@mervinprone so what we’re out. And what happened to all the scare story’s of empty shelves and lack of medicine? It was all crap. If you didn’t have access to media you wouldn’t even know if we were in or out nothing has changed. If the pandemic taught us one thing it’s that being out of the EU was a big bonus for vaccines we led the world. Cameron was a corrupt rich boy. I don’t like any of the political party’s but you vote for the lesser of two evils and I promise you that labour isn’t the same Labour Party anymore they went woke and I don’t believe they stand for British values anymore they stand for European values and themselves. They are dangerous!
Ridiculous - golden age Johnson go see a doctor mate
Just because the alternative of a labour government will be worse doesn't mean we should accept and keep in place johnson.... He should go and at the next election vote for Richard Tice's reform party
The reality of that happening is next to zero. The system is set up to benefit the two main parties.
Hitchens the previously proclaimed Trotskyist,. Socialist ,. then Conservative Christian. The consistency is reassuring. Anywhere there is a dollar to be earned.
He's changed and disavowed his past.
@@Ruda-n4h they always do. Like a reformed recidivist. Still talks nonsense though, unlike his brother Chris.
@@elainekerslake6865 Peter trumpets his ideological evolution deliberately to highlight the contrast to others who haven't publicly done so, likewise. Many, many people sitting atop institutions have revolutionary roots and Marxist backgrounds, but how many of them do you hear admitting it as part of their past?
The only person who keeps the same views their entire lives are people who never grow up. You've basically just admitted that you're an overgrown child.
@@MrXaphus name them!
I have never seen simething as hyppocritical as the party gate of Johnson. I live in Spain, but two of my children live in the UK. A lot of people went to Dubai during the first lockdown. Many friends of my children bought cheap tickets to go partying to Dubai.
Then the second lockdown arrived, and hundreds of people went to Barbados. It is astonishing how short our memory falls when it comes to our own behaviour.
Come on, many people was having parties at home those days.
You're purposely missing the point here. Those who put the rules in place breaking those rules is not the same as civilians breaking rules they didn't even want.
@@mgw2024 true. But that fake outrage in the Parliament and the media (some hosts were travelling to Barbados, while lecturing the Brittons at home) is really hyppocritical and ridiculous.
That government is the logical outcome of the society which voted for them. Do not overplay the outrage.
Go back to sleep Hitchens.
Imagine "Hitchens half hour" but with Christopher 🖤
Leftie though
Christopher was left wing he paled in comparison to Peter.
I agree that having PR won't be better than FPTP, but look at the state we're in already, looks like FPTP hasn't saved from a choice between left and more left.
I am reading " A Peoples Tragedy" by Orlando Figes currently, I am struck by the diverse interpretations of what socialism was even then. It seems to me that Marxism was eating itself even before 1905 and the violent takeover by the Bolsheviks (softened by the incorporation of the word "Soviet") was inevitable.
More more more of Peter Hitchens
The problem is the views expressed on "Talk Radio" dont reflect what the majority of the country think. Hardly anyone listens to this radio station which only exists as its sole purpose as a tory gaslighting station.
Unfortunately the views expressed on "Talk Radio" don't reflect what the majority of the country think.
James are you listening ?
@@seanmoran2743 rarely. as its an obvious gaslighting channel designed to rile listeners.
Sadly, "the majority of the country think" what BBC tells them to think.
A few years ago it was said you get the politicians you voted for moving on a few years we now get the politicians we didn’t vote for but we end up with them anyway .
I believe he is correct.
So delusion does have a name- Peter Hitchens
You can't simply give your name away like that, Linda.
Keir starmer makes me heave
politicians will never put right whats terribly wrong with the world never... in fact they will take this to the bitter end.
Why does Hitchens assume that the alternative to Boris is a Labour government? Seems like the whips have had a word with him. As to his question of what do people want in getting rid of Johnson? I would like to argue that I want any senior politician especially a PM to be accountable when he or she clearly breaks the law and blatantly lies to cover then own arse. I don’t have any respect for someone who argues that an alternative person will be worse.
What is Starmers immigration policy does anyone know ?
He doesnt know the difference between Male & female..that race question will send him.over the edge.
‘Come one, come all’, one presumes.
Open borders of course, as it’s the economic model
Back into EU, euro and free movement. Dire news indeed.
Refer to blairs stand on it
Hitchen's has no warrant to say that we'll look upon Johnson's era as a golden age.
Labour don't need a coalition with the SNP. Both are not Tory.
Labour can’t get a majority without the SNP
@@hugohugo2832 No coalition exactly the same votes Exactly the same non tory MP's.
Similarly Reform wouldn't need a tory coalition and visa versa because they would vote for tory policies anyway.
As much as I adore Peter and respect him, I hope he is wrong. But hope is futile in comparison to action.
That was a fantastic chat
So what Peter is saying is that if you vote Labour you will have buyers remorse simple. 🤷♂️🥴🥴
How are the concrete trees growing?
Hitchins used to be a card carrying Communist. And now, despite all his bluster, is a Bunter Fan Boy.
I voted for Jeremy Corbyn, I wouldn't vote for Sir Keir if you paid me.
As much as I disagreed with Jeremy’s policies I respected him for being a genuine person with genuine views who happened to be a politician. As it turned out Johnson went further than Corbyn would have dared with socialist policies and taxation of workers. Who knows what the future holds now.
@@Snoozzzzzze Corbyn wanted people to have work, he wanted them to be OFF tax credits, if you're working you shouldn't have the government subsidising your wage. He wanted Water, Energy, Rail, Travel, Mail, brought back to the people in the UK, not to be farmed out to other countries, he wanted a national bank, generic drugs that didn't rely on big pharma and their constant lobbying and funding of political systems, he wanted people to be able to work and fend for themselves, he didn't like the corrupt EU, and Tony Benn explained why he didn't like the set up. Seems to me I've a lot in common with people who have different political ideas. Forget left and right and just look at what's right.
Total Golden Age is a significant era.
Why does Peter Hitchens always interrupt? Can he just stop and listen for a second or is that too much for him?
DSM DSM - Because he likes the sound of his own voice! 🙂
A coalition of Labour & the SNP? Yech!
Labour want even tougher restrictions
Heaven forfend that an electoral system which more properly reflects the views of the electorate should deny right wing parties their divine right to rule.
Nah, Richard. You would have all sorts of nutters at the top table.
Exactly and hopefully stammer will never come even near that.
‘Pie-dough-files’ would presumably be that much more safe if Soviet Starmer became PM . . .
BE WARNED PETER IS RIGHT. !!!
Lol Peter used to say he'd never be daft enough to predict politics and that was a game for the gossip hawks ..... how he has fallen
Where are the predictions sorry?
Mr Hitchens, a beady on eye the situation. Thanks for the warnings.
Peter lost me when he dismissed green politics and the green agenda as a cause of floundering western economies propelling them towards Chinese domination.
He's right though
Why because its true?
It really is insufferable when you get left-wing leaders of ostensibly conservative parties, as we do in Australia and you have now in the UK. Conservatives are effectively disenfranchised, with the only choice to keep voting for their party as the least worst option.
Of course, that is exactly what Morrison and Johnson rely on. But I think here in Australia we've had enough of that and Morrison is going to see his support all but disappear in this year's Federal election. 🤞🤞🤞
The more I hear this guy speak the more I realise, I'm not so stupid after all.
Peter in fine form today.
Love it when he smiles and jokes.
He doesn't have half the brains of his late brother, but he does compensate for it with pomposity. Mike Graham is arguably the thickest person in broadcasting, but he has a lot of competition and funnily enough, plenty of conservative fans.
I certainly don't want Labour in power or Starmer as MP = I just want Boris gone
Man hater are we Val
Hitchens is spot on.getting rid of Boris is throwing out the baby with the bath water, why is it we never learn from lessons past?
Am willing to hear what Steve Baker is about. Is he a king-king or a servant - king?? Am research about him.
The N95 mask only filters air in not out.
cant see the peeps following Starmer any time soon
The UK is becoming so extreme in all parts of society and when politics incite this behaviour I can't see a positive outcome. The solution to an argument always lies in the middle.
! Perhaps the excluded middle?
Pity Mr Hitchens couldn't see into the future before the parties. He could have given Boris a heads up.
Can't we have Sur Desmond Swayne as PM?
Strange then that Germany did better during the pandemic, with a well resourced health system in place, with 2x the amount of GP's and specialists per population than the UK. Also strange that 'socialist' Germany has held up its economy and in particular its exports much better than the UK both during the pandemic and otherwise while in the meantime the UK is a long way down than pre Brexit/pre covid. Also PR has not produced 'parties of the left' but has kept a sensible middle ground where businesses have thrived and less people live on the streets or out of food banks, unlike the UK.
I'd vote for Steve Baker .
Why do scotland want another ref
Why are you showing Hitchens before the watershed?
Keir is far and away preferable to Jeremy! And I'm no Socialist!
With less charisma than Michael Foot's Duffle coat.
Yes, Herr Starmer will put us in shackles if he becomes PM.
Hitchens is nuts
Looks like we're about to find out..
Well, your comment aged well 😅
@@misssparkle8317 Yes, I agree. Hitchens has got worse over time.
If starmer is pm then we are more screwed than ever
How would he be any different than Boris Johnson?
@@nawaz345 because Boris has battered nonce starmer on politics he's just made a little error socially
@@johnwales29 Johnson has literally failed at producing any of his campaign promises or reforms. He hasn't even "got Brexit done" which was his main fucking reason to get into PM
@@johnwales29 how has he battered him? I’m not pro starmer or anything I just don’t get why people think starmer’s premiership would be so much worse. Both him and Johnson have a tax and spend model of government. I literally see nothing between them apart from rhetoric (Johnson’s cabinet talk a more anti-immigrant, anti-progressive talk, but obvs do nothing about it)
@@nawaz345 I've explained in my previous replys, if nonce starmer was in charge more people would die, we still be in lockdown, we have no virus n businesss would fail, unemployment would be so high !
More right wing drivel
You prefer left wing drivel?
@@gerardk51 I’d rather far left than far right.
@@zaktivist Why? The far Left have killed tens of millions. Stalin: 60 million. Mao: 80 million. And the rest.
VOTE BOTH OF THEM OUT NOT FIT FOR PURPOSE
Why has Hitchens never been a supporter of Rees-Mogg?
Jealous of his money and class
@@millwallholdings I doubt it, but Rees-Mogg to me is probably the only genuinely conserative MP's right now. I can't think of another one
Ah yes. The man that thinks you can grow concrete.