How effective are discards? | Balatro

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 янв 2025

Комментарии • 100

  • @Hlebuw3k
    @Hlebuw3k 10 месяцев назад +156

    Fun fact:
    With a hand size of zero, you have a 100% chance to draw nothing at all! And the game straight up gives you a lose screen to end your suffering.

    • @bquad2
      @bquad2 9 месяцев назад +13

      this also happens if you play/discard every card in your deck

    • @mat-_-vey
      @mat-_-vey 5 месяцев назад +1

      Также если ты дойдёшь до 39 анте (без мода на увеличение максима набираемых чисел до очень больших) 1e308 это всё что можно набрать = naneinf, но 39 анте nane, что больше и у тебя нет выхода из этой ситуации, кроме проигрыша

  • @brysonlambes7175
    @brysonlambes7175 10 месяцев назад +198

    The thing with four fingers is that it makes it really easy to get straight flushes. with that joker the four card straight and the four card flush don't need to be the same four cards, you can have a straight containing 3 of the same suit and then a fifth card of that suit outside the flush and it counts as a straight flush. 😊

    • @flareflareon
      @flareflareon 10 месяцев назад +14

      Probably even easier with the shortcut joker

    • @GreenLinzerd
      @GreenLinzerd 10 месяцев назад +3

      @@flareflareonI had a run with both, I can attest to that

    • @subrezon
      @subrezon 9 месяцев назад +14

      I wouldn't call it "really easy", but yeah it definitely upgrades Straight Flushes from happening "almost never" to "occasionally".

  • @HamidKarzai
    @HamidKarzai 10 месяцев назад +72

    I did get the feeling that flushes were easier to achieve in this game than straights, I guess this confirms it

    • @kkrup5395
      @kkrup5395 10 месяцев назад +16

      that's pretty easy feeling to confirm just thinking about it when you discard. You fish for any 9 only 4 cards out of 40+ will work for you, when you fish for any of hearts about quoter of the deck works for you

    • @HamidKarzai
      @HamidKarzai 10 месяцев назад +8

      @@kkrup5395that makes sense, but then it seems wrong that the game scores straights lower than flushes

    • @Nosirrbro
      @Nosirrbro 10 месяцев назад +8

      @@HamidKarzaiI think it makes sense, if they scored things in a different order than poker hands that would just be confusing, instead they make things like the straight mult cards more effective than the flush mult cards for balance

    • @dommaster661
      @dommaster661 10 месяцев назад +2

      ​@@HamidKarzaimaybe to make it early friedly /increase the chance for one hander in the first ante. The Planets balanced it out with straights harder to get better stats than flush with worse stats.

  • @ecstaticwooper368
    @ecstaticwooper368 7 дней назад +3

    I think the fact that flush likeliness scales faster with discards than any other hand is really interesting, I wonder how it happens.

    • @Laezar1
      @Laezar1 5 дней назад +1

      it's because by default each draw is a 1/4 chance to be a specific suit and it decreases with each of that suit you draw, so in a jumble of cards the distribution will tend to be a bit of everything making flushes hard to obtain with just one hand.
      But discard allows you to target specific suits to eliminate and while you don't have good odds to make a flush you are guaranteed to have at least 2 of a suit and have really high odds to have 3, which means now you are discarding 5 cards looking for only 2 or 3 of a suit instead of 5 and each hit is about 1/4 chance per card draw.
      So if you got 3 of a suit, discard 5, you need only to hit 2 of your chosen suit in those 5 cards, likely you'll get one, and then with a second discard you are discarding 4 cards looking for only one of a specific suit.
      If you compare with straights, because there are a lot of different numbers hitting duplicates isn't that likely at a baseline making it not that unlikely to hit a straight, but when you discard you have to look for a narrow specific set of cards to try to hit your straight (and if it's in the middle of the straight only one number can do it)
      Basically initial hand is fully random draw while discard is curated meaning the wider the target you're aiming at the more efficient it'll be. Initial hand for something like a full house you can hit any combination of a full house and hit your target and there are many combination to hit. But once you start discarding you're not looking for "a full house" anymore but for "this full house" which is a much narrower target than "this suit".

    • @ecstaticwooper368
      @ecstaticwooper368 5 дней назад +1

      @@Laezar1 DANG that was more in depth than I could've asked for, thx!

  • @foxtrott5648
    @foxtrott5648 10 месяцев назад +11

    i bought balatro and I've been having a blast, understanding the probabilities and manipulating them thanks to your videos!! thanks!!

  • @pirate135246
    @pirate135246 10 месяцев назад +31

    this video is an excellent reason why non flush hands such as straights need a buff

    • @hashtag3073
      @hashtag3073 10 месяцев назад +15

      the thing about flushes is there is a boss blind designed specifically to ruin each one's day, I've had many a strong flush run cut short by having 2/3 of my deck debuffed.

    • @TWlaz
      @TWlaz 10 месяцев назад +21

      Chips/mult wise, Flushes scale worse than a lot of other hand types.

    • @pirate135246
      @pirate135246 10 месяцев назад

      doesn't matter when they are the easiest to beat ante 8 with@@TWlaz

    • @pirate135246
      @pirate135246 10 месяцев назад +1

      @@hashtag3073 there are also many ways to reroll or skip boss blinds, and you might be thinking if you get it early you wont be able to avoid it but in that case it's usually not a problem yet

    • @picklenik9658
      @picklenik9658 10 месяцев назад +5

      @@TWlazexactky, i always avoid flush builds because they feel like an easy trap to fall into, and probably probably being fine to beat Ante 8, there’s no way you get past Ante 12 (the notoriously high jump to 300 million) with a flush build.

  • @bioniclink2527
    @bioniclink2527 10 месяцев назад +10

    With the quality, I expected this to be a 10k or so channel. But nope!
    Good on you. You earned a sub.
    Seems like this video's kinda blowing up, so that's nice to see.

  • @nickrogers3624
    @nickrogers3624 10 месяцев назад +19

    I did make a high card build with burnt joker and it is incredibly strong. Do not worry about what your deck looks like at all, just spam high card. I got high card leveled to about 45 before I hit final ante

    • @apocalypsehero
      @apocalypsehero  10 месяцев назад +13

      High card, the only card I can count on.

    • @Ayden-D65
      @Ayden-D65 10 месяцев назад +3

      If you get burnt joker early you should almost always go for high card

    • @Arakus99
      @Arakus99 10 месяцев назад

      @@Ayden-D65unless you’re on Checkered Deck (both of my burnt runs were with checkered)

    • @Applestoroger
      @Applestoroger 10 месяцев назад

      High card and a handful of steel!

    • @dearen7588
      @dearen7588 7 дней назад

      I always end up getting the wall as the final boss with high card runs and my average high card ends up only being 100-200k points 😢

  • @PieMoe
    @PieMoe 10 месяцев назад +16

    I appreciate the mention of 5s and 10s affecting straights. It feels so hard to build a deck around straights because I always want to manipulate the cards.
    Do NOT change card ranks if youre hoping for a straight. You are either adding more trash or removing the card you need. If you insist on modifying ranks, start with either 2 A or K since they are only in two possible straights. And even then, its maybe more worth your time to ensure that all card ranks are being trimmed evenly to best avoid dupes

    • @josh___something
      @josh___something 10 месяцев назад +5

      The way I deckbuild straights is to just massacre the low end, and duplicate the high end. Focus on the A-9 portion, disregard anything below 6.

    • @theendofthestart8179
      @theendofthestart8179 10 месяцев назад

      dont add or change, only remove, pretty simple, dont waste your gold on stuff that is bad.

    • @theendofthestart8179
      @theendofthestart8179 10 месяцев назад

      @@josh___something duplicating anything is actively bad for straights

  • @doodleblah8275
    @doodleblah8275 10 месяцев назад +4

    At the risk of becoming a one-trick channel, I’d love to see some more niche balatro analysis like this :)

    • @apocalypsehero
      @apocalypsehero  9 месяцев назад +1

      If I find something fun to do another Balatro video about I wouldn’t be opposed, but I like bouncing around. Thanks for watching!

  • @computerpwner
    @computerpwner 10 месяцев назад +20

    Nice video! Although I wonder why the checkered deck was omitted. Since it would have very different odds to draw flushes and straight flushes
    edit: thinking a bit more I suppose it's equivalent to a normal deck with a permanent smeared joker

    • @apocalypsehero
      @apocalypsehero  10 месяцев назад +27

      Haha… I forgot it existed. Its odds should be identical to using the smeared joker though.

    • @nimrodzaphnath5495
      @nimrodzaphnath5495 10 месяцев назад +2

      Question is, what is the best card(s) to use hanged man in order to improve straight odds.

    • @EpicDude467
      @EpicDude467 10 месяцев назад +1

      ​@@nimrodzaphnath5495every straight has to contain a 4 or a 10 but besides that youre best off choosing 5 cards and deleting / converting everything else

    • @1TieDye1
      @1TieDye1 10 месяцев назад

      Didn’t address jokers that increase hand size either, which make your hand larger and effectively improve your discards too, by allowing you to discard more cards per discard, when you are holding on to over three cards

    • @edysfunction_
      @edysfunction_ 10 месяцев назад +2

      @@EpicDude467every straight has to have a 10 or a 5, not a 4

  • @landon8952
    @landon8952 10 месяцев назад +3

    This confirms to me that straights are the most awkward build. Harder to discard to than flushes, and unlike other low probability hands, it’s extremely difficult to raise their likelihood with deck modifications. Maybe their planet cards should be buffed. It’d be a bit weird breaking the standard poker hand ranking though

    • @MammaSomari
      @MammaSomari Месяц назад +1

      I'm only a couple of runs into the game so far but the Shortcut joker seems to enable the playing of nearly guaranteed straights.

  • @willnash7907
    @willnash7907 10 месяцев назад +2

    Solid analysis!

  • @kipikii
    @kipikii 10 месяцев назад +4

    nice video! underrated channel

  • @Google_Corporation
    @Google_Corporation 10 месяцев назад +1

    Interesting odds, I'd be very curious to see how these line up with hand payout value for expected return! I think for this it would be very easy to calculate expected return on gunning for a specific hand out the gate. Additionally, you have essentially built a simple balatro AI, haha. Once you have the methods in place for an expected return calculator, it's as simple as plugging in your current hand, then following what the simulator's highest expected value move is. (This is also very similar to how chess bots work)

  • @hotdogskid
    @hotdogskid 10 месяцев назад +1

    I was wondering about discards from the last video but i thought itd be too difficult to make an algorithm for discarding, but the madlad actually did it!

  • @LagiacrusHunter
    @LagiacrusHunter 10 месяцев назад +1

    And then you factor in DNA and Trading Card to slowly build a deck entirely made of Aces until you're guaranteed to get a Flush 5 every time 😂 Such a fantastic game, thanks for the math breakdown!

    • @apocalypsehero
      @apocalypsehero  10 месяцев назад +1

      Can't say I care much for DNA, but I do love trading card.

    • @mmmmmmmtoast
      @mmmmmmmtoast 10 месяцев назад +1

      ​@@apocalypseheroDNA is absolutely amazing with the right build. A blueprint or brainstorm really helps but just imagine duping steel red seal kings every round while you have baron and high level high card. It carries you to really high antes easily

    • @Oleg-px3us
      @Oleg-px3us 10 месяцев назад +1

      @@apocalypsehero DNA by itself isn't great but it's absolutely incredible for endless runs. Trading card is always great though, I agree.

  • @TheFatManatee
    @TheFatManatee 10 месяцев назад +1

    while you do mention stright flush/royal flush in passing what are the odds of a straight flush when you consider smear joker/checker deck, 4 fingers, and/or shortcut? especially as another commenter mentioned how 4 fingers can make it so a hand that is a straight and a flush (but not both, e.g 5,6,7,8 of hearts and the 9 of clubs) into a straight flush

  • @kwerner
    @kwerner 10 месяцев назад +1

    That was some impressive math! 👍

  • @malcolmw121
    @malcolmw121 10 месяцев назад +1

    I've got a couple points and a couple questions-
    OK, so just adding fives and tens is not good for the odds.
    -fives and tens are still the best cards to enhance for that reason, right...?
    -similarly, let's say you want to make steel or gold cards, and are going for specific hands. What are the best cards to convert? A 2, knowing you won't want to keep it in favor of a higher number, or a 10, knowing you're more likely to hold onto it for the score, but might end up needing to use it?
    -what about adding, say, three 5s and 10s, two 4s, 6s, 9s, and Js, and one 3, 7, 8, and Q? does that raise the odds?
    How does *removing* certain cards play into the odds? Say for example, I use Hanged Man to remove two 2's, and then keep that in mind as I discard?
    What about *converting* cards? Say I convert a K and a J to an A and Q respectively via Strength. Just how much does that raise my odds of a Full House, for example?
    ...what are the odds of drawing three or four pair? Because that seems to happen to me a lot more often than I'd like. What's the best way to prevent that scenario?

    • @apocalypsehero
      @apocalypsehero  10 месяцев назад

      1. Fives and tens being necessary for every straight does make them optimal when deciding what to enhance.
      2. In terms of immediate benefit you probably want to buff cards you don't anticipate using in your hands. But in the long run where you optimize the deck it's best to congregate your buffs on combo pieces since you'll either be removing or converting the rest of the deck.
      3. I didn't do many tests but any scenario where I added cards resulting in the odds of a straight going down, so the real question is which cards are best to remove first and an even spread seems best or removing an entire half.
      4. Yeah, the results stated aren't perfect considering my algorithm isn't advanced enough to consider remaining deck statistics when making it's discards, just focusing on current state and highest odds discards given an unknown remainder. So if you consider what you've done with your deck when discarding mileage will vary.
      That's all I'm gonna say for now, that's one heavy comment. XD Thanks for watching!

    • @Laezar1
      @Laezar1 5 дней назад

      I'd argue, ignoring jokers you want to enhance 8 and 7 actually. while they are excluded from some straights they are also compatible with each other so there are many straights where they both are in and then you can expand outwards having 9 and 6 as secondary priority and 10/5 as tertiary. letting you maximize the number of possible enhanced cards in your straights.
      That being said 9-6 are really bad cards in term of jokers. 10 is mediocre but it's needed in any straight that involves face cards and 5 is going to appear in any hack straight. so if you take jokers into account they become much more appealing though the joker you have will end up directing where you concentrate your efforts.
      Generally if I start leaning towards face cards I'd prioritize jacks since they're close to 10 and still trigger face card synergies, and if I got some lower card synergies buffing fibonnaci cards with 5 as priority seems to be the way to go.
      The actual answer though is don't play straights, they'll ruin your life and betray you at the worst moment =p

  • @NitBeanTheMachine
    @NitBeanTheMachine 3 месяца назад +1

    What are the odds of drawing a straight with 2 discards + shortcut? I’m guessing like 90-something?

    • @apocalypsehero
      @apocalypsehero  22 дня назад

      I bricked the simulator so I can't get an exact number but I'm fairly certain the odds of getting a straight with just one discard and shortcut is already like 90%.

  • @terencebad7009
    @terencebad7009 6 месяцев назад

    It would be more useful to have a bit more detail around which hand to fish for if you draw, for example, 3 or 4 in a row fishing for a straight vs trying to draw flush, as that’s the situation that usually happens in ante 1.

  • @gloomxglory
    @gloomxglory 10 месяцев назад

    This man just said "flush straights"

  • @tsawy6
    @tsawy6 6 месяцев назад +1

    Fundamentally, the tricky part of this analysis is making a truly intelligwnt discard algorithm. Most notably, i dont think youve fully accounted for straight discsrd patterns, and how they can be influenced by understanding what remains in the deck

  • @ethanveach8451
    @ethanveach8451 10 месяцев назад +1

    Wouldn't Checkered deck do the same thing as smeared joker? Or am I misunderstanding something.

  • @jacobv_
    @jacobv_ 10 месяцев назад

    With all 3 of the jokers mentioned I got an extremely reliable straight flush deck. I would get a straight flush with 0 or 1 discard basically every time.

    • @Leotagorax
      @Leotagorax 10 месяцев назад

      yeah, true, but in the lowest difficulty, right? In some upper streak is almost impossible, I think...

  • @theendofthestart8179
    @theendofthestart8179 10 месяцев назад

    is the thing with 5 and 10 if you never discard?

    • @apocalypsehero
      @apocalypsehero  9 месяцев назад +1

      The reduction in odds by adding 5s and 10s does factor in discards. That being said my discard algorithm is far from perfect so mileage may vary.

  • @piktogramm
    @piktogramm 10 месяцев назад +1

    Thanks !

  • @limbolegs
    @limbolegs 6 месяцев назад

    love it

  • @loliceblocks
    @loliceblocks 6 месяцев назад

    I appreciate the opportunity to be wrong in the comments. Cocky, yet engaging. Well played.

  • @gabrielnobreketter3808
    @gabrielnobreketter3808 10 месяцев назад

    very good video!
    I would've liked, if you could have shown how the odds are for highcards, because I heard somewhere, that after 3 discards, it's more than 69%

  • @raptorrampage2109
    @raptorrampage2109 10 месяцев назад +2

    For the algorithm

  • @PalXen
    @PalXen 25 дней назад

    the discard mechanic. Honestly its horrible at times, sometimes it gives you the same cards you discarded but different suits OR 2-5 random cards that you just do not want and then you run out of discards and you are F'd tbh without multi jokers for 2 pairs? its very very difficult to get any high chip count at all.

    • @apocalypsehero
      @apocalypsehero  22 дня назад

      Yeah, unless I'm running a hand with high rates or a deck that has been trimmed I wouldn't rely on it getting me the cards I need, but I'd still rather have it than not.

  • @bbrainstormer2036
    @bbrainstormer2036 10 месяцев назад

    Real poker is full of math, it makes since that Balatro would follow suit (pun intended)

  • @annaheritage931
    @annaheritage931 10 месяцев назад +4

    Holy heck that is not many views

    • @terrydactyl2077
      @terrydactyl2077 10 месяцев назад +2

      Well. You did comment less than an hour after he posted.

    • @jaginovsky
      @jaginovsky 10 месяцев назад +1

      @@terrydactyl2077holy heck that’s still not many views

    • @terrydactyl2077
      @terrydactyl2077 10 месяцев назад +1

      @@jaginovsky lot more than 19

    • @jaginovsky
      @jaginovsky 10 месяцев назад

      @@terrydactyl2077 math!

    • @terrydactyl2077
      @terrydactyl2077 10 месяцев назад

      @@jaginovsky I wish I was good at math then I’d be better at this bloody game!

  • @markopopovic9874
    @markopopovic9874 10 месяцев назад +1

    Great video
    And hot voice

  • @MyArti2000
    @MyArti2000 10 месяцев назад +1

    Im gonnna coment just becaus I can xd

  • @MyArti2000
    @MyArti2000 10 месяцев назад

    Next coment becaus it is great vid

  • @MyArti2000
    @MyArti2000 10 месяцев назад

    For ststs

  • @ausmiku
    @ausmiku 9 месяцев назад

    What a useless video. What sort of discards are you talking about, 1 card, all cards or just unwanted cards ? There's a difference you know ?!

    • @rogierownage
      @rogierownage 15 дней назад

      He briefly explained the algorithm in the video