Crew protection and survivability is important as well. With an auto loader, if the type 99 is hit and penetrated, that turret will likely pop right off like a t-72 and the whole crew wiped out. Unlike the Abrams.
1:37 Well, that round on the war thunder example is no longer used by any country (at least is not used by modern tanks like the Type-99), i think is from early WW2. Modern tanks use a better Heat-Fs round
It is a totally nonsense comparison. Tank vs Tank is non existent or have you not been paying attention to what is going on in Ukraine?? The question is, a tank when facing *multiple* opponents armed with IFV with anti-tank weapons, other MBTs and *drones* not to mention ATGM shoulder filed. THAT is the only question to poise.
Any tank is a threat to that old tin can Abrams nowadays. The american main battle tank has almost not changed since the 1980s. Even russia did some major upgrades to their T-series
Абрамс очень сильно поменялся с тех времён, изучите вопрос. Но проблемы есть, особенно с весом. Поэтому они ведут работы над более лёгким вариантом нового танка.
This entire comparison is useless. Countries to the west with tanks are Japan, Australia and the USA are all across large bodies of water. China is not an expeditionary military and doesn't have logistics to transport the Type-99 anywhere. Their fighting doctrine is entirely defensive fighting within China. The USA is an expeditionary military and fights all of it's wars across the oceans but the USA will not invade China because it doesn't want or need to. The USA would fight China with naval and air power. So why does China have the type-99? A deterrence against countries to the east with tanks, Russia and India ,which can go over land into China. Do a comparison against the tanks of those countries.
You are severely underestimating the Chinese, they have a higher industrial output over America, yes the US have technology, but China has output, they can build 30 000 type-99 tanks per month, plus they have hypersonic missiles and a larger navy. The US can only dream of those numbers. You are useless, attacking good videos with your useless ignorant comments.
the only war won by China this last 150 years was the civilian war in 1949, chines haves no experience of modern war, ZTZ 99 is a kind of T-72 T-90 and it haves the same autocooking autoloader, chines army is just a paper army
The Chinese were secretly involved in Vietnam, they sent 400 000 troops and lots of equipment, and is one of the reasons the US lost that war. Dont underestimate them.
Crew protection and survivability is important as well. With an auto loader, if the type 99 is hit and penetrated, that turret will likely pop right off like a t-72 and the whole crew wiped out. Unlike the Abrams.
1:37 Well, that round on the war thunder example is no longer used by any country (at least is not used by modern tanks like the Type-99), i think is from early WW2. Modern tanks use a better Heat-Fs round
Yes true, I couldnt find the fin stabilized heat projectiles
@@GUNNERHEATTANK i don't blame you for that, just see the modifications in modern tanks and you will find it :)
It is a totally nonsense comparison. Tank vs Tank is non existent or have you not been paying attention to what is going on in Ukraine?? The question is, a tank when facing *multiple* opponents armed with IFV with anti-tank weapons, other MBTs and *drones* not to mention ATGM shoulder filed. THAT is the only question to poise.
The question still remains. Yes, there hasn't been a LOT of tank-on-tank, but it's not completely absent from battle.
моменты из игры War thunder
Any tank is a threat to that old tin can Abrams nowadays. The american main battle tank has almost not changed since the 1980s. Even russia did some major upgrades to their T-series
Say you no nothing about armored warfare without saying you know absolutely nothing about armored warfare🤣🤣
Me after lobotomy:
congrats that is some top notch trolling, you almost got me
@@trickslies844 read up on M1, M1A1, M1A2 etc.. almost everything but the hull has changed.
Абрамс очень сильно поменялся с тех времён, изучите вопрос. Но проблемы есть, особенно с весом. Поэтому они ведут работы над более лёгким вариантом нового танка.
This entire comparison is useless. Countries to the west with tanks are Japan, Australia and the USA are all across large bodies of water. China is not an expeditionary military and doesn't have logistics to transport the Type-99 anywhere. Their fighting doctrine is entirely defensive fighting within China. The USA is an expeditionary military and fights all of it's wars across the oceans but the USA will not invade China because it doesn't want or need to. The USA would fight China with naval and air power. So why does China have the type-99? A deterrence against countries to the east with tanks, Russia and India ,which can go over land into China. Do a comparison against the tanks of those countries.
You are severely underestimating the Chinese, they have a higher industrial output over America, yes the US have technology, but China has output, they can build 30 000 type-99 tanks per month, plus they have hypersonic missiles and a larger navy. The US can only dream of those numbers. You are useless, attacking good videos with your useless ignorant comments.
the only war won by China this last 150 years was the civilian war in 1949, chines haves no experience of modern war, ZTZ 99 is a kind of T-72 T-90 and it haves the same autocooking autoloader, chines army is just a paper army
The Chinese were secretly involved in Vietnam, they sent 400 000 troops and lots of equipment, and is one of the reasons the US lost that war. Dont underestimate them.