This US Tank Will Change EVERYTHING - Here is Why!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 20 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 179

  • @johnthompson1558
    @johnthompson1558 3 месяца назад +47

    Why do these sites put out details about our equipment? We don't need to know. Just in case keep the enemy in the dark. Your daughter's or son's lives may depend on it!

    • @JohnHill-k6p
      @JohnHill-k6p 3 месяца назад

      There’s no such thing as a secret. They have spies guess what so do we have spies and this this video along with any of the others really don’t go into that great detail of their capabilities how they’re made what the protection level is they give you general, broad ideas. The Russians, the Chinese other countries aren’t stupid. They can figure this stuff out. They can build things that are equal and in many cases they do. The biggest difference is who operates those pieces of equipment. That’s the most critical part and that’s why the US generally comes ahead.

    • @edc8909
      @edc8909 3 месяца назад

      Every country has spies. Plus, builders of this equipment shops it around to other countries 😊

    • @dewayneleek4588
      @dewayneleek4588 3 месяца назад

      Biden left our equipment for the enemies to use,,,doesn't make any difference if they advertise it

    • @flotterotto4491
      @flotterotto4491 3 месяца назад +7

      Don't worry, this nothing special. It's more simple propaganda....

    • @MBobroff-mn2qt
      @MBobroff-mn2qt 3 месяца назад +5

      Actually, the US military wants our enemies to know about it. Why? If your enemy knows we have it, they have to plan for it and develop something to counter it. By making your enemy react to your capabilities, your enemy is reacting to us and expend resources to do so. If they did not know what we have, they would develop to their needs and we would react to them.

  • @bobbyduke777
    @bobbyduke777 3 месяца назад +10

    Just watch a video from Ukraine. A Bradley took out a T90, with only HE rounds because that's all it had left. He shot the electronics off the turret of the T-90 and blinded them and broke the turret controls somehow the turret spun full speed as the T-90 drove into a huge tree. They then hit it with a tow. The gunner said he got the idea from playing video games.

    • @williambailey8340
      @williambailey8340 3 месяца назад +1

      The t90 has ineffective era

    • @sharonburmeister4149
      @sharonburmeister4149 3 месяца назад

      Unfortunately U just revealed sensitive classified information regarding American participation in the Ukraine war through the out of uniform Americans "persuaded" to volunteer.

    • @rdelrosso1973
      @rdelrosso1973 2 месяца назад +2

      bobby:
      These Ukrainians and their video games!
      Putin did not know "he bit off more than he can chew"!
      About 2 years ago, one Ukrainian soldier controlling a Drone said "he learned how to speak English from playing video games"!
      I did not know you could DO that!
      Slava Ukriainia!

  • @seancooper7388
    @seancooper7388 3 месяца назад +4

    The "metal storm " system should be looked at for taking down drones. It seems perfect for the task.

  • @rymns
    @rymns 3 месяца назад +4

    Ukraine can say if Bradley is good or not ... they love it, even an old version of it.

  • @aaronellington5546
    @aaronellington5546 3 месяца назад +7

    The Bradley is a nice addition to the Abrams. The Bradley is used to look around and be the scout for the Abrams tank.

    • @markbrisec3972
      @markbrisec3972 2 месяца назад

      Bradleys turned out to be the best armored vehicles in the War in Ukraine.. Ukrainian troops love the beast and the venerable IFV has shown to be much more valuable to them than even the Abrams tank.. Part of the reason for that is the fact that we actually gave enough Bradleys to Ukrainians so they can use them in a meaningful way (hundreds of Bradleys have been transferred vs only 31 Abrams). The next reason is the fact that the Abrams is simply too heavy for the battlefield of Ukraine.. They've bogged down in mud too many times, while the lighter Bradley just flies over these muddy traps. Abrams was great for the sands of the Middle East, not so much for the mud of Europe.
      Of course Bradleys turned out to be order of magnitude better than the Soviet/Russian IFV counterparts that Ukrainians used extensively before Bradleys arrived. The armor is superior to BMP series of vehicles, as are the sensors and the gun stabilization.. Bradleys rule the battlefield, and I have to point out that we've transferred older models. SO the newer ones would be even better..

  • @MrJabezw
    @MrJabezw 3 месяца назад +3

    I love this site and I hate this site because, it gives out crucial information on how to destroy or disrupt this tanks function. I believe that keeping this information top secret so, that enemy doesn’t create counter measures to destroy this wonderful piece of equipment.

  • @VinhNguyenf
    @VinhNguyenf 3 месяца назад +20

    They forgot to put a refrigerator and dishwasher on top of the turret too

  • @rdelrosso1973
    @rdelrosso1973 2 месяца назад +3

    Why does the headline say "TANK", when it's NOT a Tank?
    It's an Infantry Fighting Vehicle or Armored Personnel Carrier.
    And a GOOD one, too!

    • @sarumano884
      @sarumano884 2 месяца назад

      So good it can be used in an anti-tank role.

  • @bertrpk
    @bertrpk 3 месяца назад +25

    The Bradley is not a tank

    • @Thwarptide
      @Thwarptide 3 месяца назад +4

      It’s called click bait for a reason, ya know.

    • @DartXL
      @DartXL 3 месяца назад

      Would you like me to put up a sign that says 'I am a troop carrier, not a tank, please do not shoot' in fifty languages?” (c) Pentagon Wars, 1998.
      Why try to protect the Bradley with new add-ons and a more powerful engine? This will greatly increase not only the weight, but also the price, and the Bradley already costs the US army more than a Russian-made tank for Russia. Ok. Good luck to the U.S. to go bankrupt on this shit.

    • @rymns
      @rymns 3 месяца назад +1

      It is a light tank man, dont be stupíd. Started as an APC, but nowadays IS A TANK.

    • @Laakona
      @Laakona 3 месяца назад +4

      @@rymns Only to the media and people who were never Tankers.

    • @a.girouard2988
      @a.girouard2988 2 месяца назад +1

      Jesus, no kidding... the number of armchair military expert RUclips channels that have popped up in the past couple years is amazing. Most of the creators have no background in the military.

  • @saul890
    @saul890 3 месяца назад

    Those two Bradly’s lit 🔥 that tank up

  • @robertmcdonnold3038
    @robertmcdonnold3038 3 месяца назад +2

    Not a tank. It's the main gun that determines whether it's a tank.

  • @normanntege5603
    @normanntege5603 3 месяца назад +1

    Maybe it's for market purposes but there shd be a semblance of secrecy to keep details from becoming public issues

  • @MrWhiskers65
    @MrWhiskers65 Месяц назад

    Apparently they went from a Jeep with a gun and a bit of armour to the Bradley? 😂

  • @NormanTshisikule
    @NormanTshisikule 3 месяца назад +2

    What about the threat of the dreaded drones?

  • @doogiestutz
    @doogiestutz 2 месяца назад +2

    why do you civilians INSIST ON CALLING AN APC A DAMN TANK???? smh

  • @LRock-um8xo
    @LRock-um8xo 2 месяца назад

    The Bradley is a Tank Killer! Not a tank. My cousin an Army Veteran served during Desert Storm, he told me because he was a gunner for a Bradley. Told me once the devastation caused by the depleted uranium rounds on Tanks looks like a firework stand on fire when it exploded. He doesn’t talk about it much.😮

    • @danielgall3729
      @danielgall3729 2 месяца назад

      The Bradley is NOT a tank killer, its job is to get Infantry to the battle rested and safely. When the Infantry soldiers have dis mounted, the Bradley moves into an over watch postion for the dismounted troops and tanks an other elements of the combat teams. The Bradley is not meant for head to head incounters with tanks.

  • @jeremyfields9281
    @jeremyfields9281 3 месяца назад +1

    To my understanding the bushmaster is supposed to be getting upgraded to a 50 later on

  • @zebradun7407
    @zebradun7407 3 месяца назад +2

    That is one big tall, broad target.

  • @guissepevisciglio-qj6uc
    @guissepevisciglio-qj6uc 2 месяца назад +2

    Aggressive tank

  • @yugoyankoff-vh7in
    @yugoyankoff-vh7in Месяц назад

    The Bradley isn’t “A Tank” but A Infantry Fighting Vehicle. There’s a huge difference !

  • @JuanSanchez-zg7ti
    @JuanSanchez-zg7ti 2 месяца назад

    I believe that the USAF pilots should be carrier landing qualified, because you will never know when you might need to land or re-fuel or re-armed at a NAVY carrier while on a mission. That should be a mandatory training before you get your wings.

    • @peterbaker8443
      @peterbaker8443 Месяц назад

      Two different mission skill sets, two different aircraft specs

  • @P-J-W-777
    @P-J-W-777 3 месяца назад +1

    The updated Cummins VTA903 new updated rating is in excess of 750hp.

  • @libertadbansag9229
    @libertadbansag9229 2 месяца назад +1

    " THE BEST TANK IN THE WEST!"❤😂

  • @jessieerikacoon1673
    @jessieerikacoon1673 3 месяца назад +2

    Soon 25 MM gun will be replace with 50 MM gun...

  • @charlesanthony4693
    @charlesanthony4693 Месяц назад

    It is NOT a Tank. It is a Infantry Fighting Vehicle used by Infantry and Calvary Scouts.

  • @agrimensor6406
    @agrimensor6406 Месяц назад

    Can they not just modernized M11A3? Fitted with 25mm chain gun, dual ATGM and added protection from ERA and APS, its economical but efficient and effective IFV....

  • @richardmarshall159
    @richardmarshall159 Месяц назад

    High profile may create a easier target for combatants

  • @sharonburmeister4149
    @sharonburmeister4149 3 месяца назад

    The Bradley was vulnerable in Iraq. Even camel and goat herders figured out ways to stop it. They had help from Iran and Iran's allies. Speed is important but not so much in cities and urbans areas. The Tanks have turbine engines and can outdistance the Bradley.

  • @davidjonah7402
    @davidjonah7402 Месяц назад

    It’s a big tank with a tiny little gun and the whole thing looks to be bolted together sort of like what they had in the first world war

  • @elbanoleon1037
    @elbanoleon1037 Месяц назад

    Nice

  • @adrianuspratama1303
    @adrianuspratama1303 3 месяца назад

    So what is the purpose to show bradley ability ? As exportable armor?

  • @jtbheflin
    @jtbheflin 3 месяца назад +2

    The front picture is click bait,it’s just an oversized Bradley

    • @nicfarrow
      @nicfarrow 3 месяца назад

      And with shadows all wrong! They didn’t spend two minutes on this!

  • @snuffle2269
    @snuffle2269 3 месяца назад

    Kornet food. Eat one first thing in the morning for extra energy. Same with the Panzerfaust 3-T600. Chinese Red Dragon HJ-3B You can dress up a pig but it is still a PIG but it will always be a MIC cash cow.

  • @annelucadou-wells3597
    @annelucadou-wells3597 Месяц назад

    What happened to the 50 mm main gun ?

  • @Mach-6
    @Mach-6 3 месяца назад

    Good Shielding apparently.....!!!!!

  • @JohnJohn-q8o
    @JohnJohn-q8o 3 месяца назад +2

    Ivf the narrator got it wrong.. ifv i think. Please edit before you upload

  • @williamdevereaux7484
    @williamdevereaux7484 Месяц назад

    Drones are making tanks obsolete.

  • @RDBean
    @RDBean 3 месяца назад

    Guess the Lynx is not working out so well

  • @robkh2136
    @robkh2136 2 месяца назад

    Can it defeat drones?

  • @josephdelp87
    @josephdelp87 3 месяца назад

    Instead of TOWs it has Javelin. A 50mm cannon.

  • @danfarrand9072
    @danfarrand9072 3 месяца назад +1

    Drones are the game changer. Bradley has performed well, but the AFU has lost most of the first tranche they received. These IFV's die and burn just like everything else. The difference is they cost 10 million dollars each. The video made no mention of the fact that none of these are being built. They are all based on existing hulls that are being upgraded.
    There are plenty of videos of Bradleys and dead crew or Bradleys with crew dragging themselves out of dead machines with missing legs and feet. There is no magic in these weapons. They are good but not game changers. Everyone and everything on the battlefield is a target. I'd probably rather be in a Bradley than a BMP2 or 3, but what I want is meaningless in war.

  • @JJPlayzOnP5
    @JJPlayzOnP5 2 месяца назад

    it is a tank its main purpose changes in war, Desert Storm when they ran the bradley crew and Abrams, no bradleys were used as IFVs and actually destroyed tanks and still is classified as a tank, IFV literally has the name, Fighting Vehicle. They have Good armor against light tanks and RPGs unlike APCs like the M113 who transport troops and thats its main purpose. My point is the bradley is a tank so you can’t tell me otherwise.

    • @a.girouard2988
      @a.girouard2988 2 месяца назад

      Actually, the U. S. military who designed the Bradley can tell you otherwise. It's not a tank. It carries infantry into battle; MBTs (aside from Merkavas) can't do that. It has weaker armor. It has weaker armament. Why? Because it was designed to give fire support to infantry and armor.

    • @JJPlayzOnP5
      @JJPlayzOnP5 2 месяца назад

      @@a.girouard2988 so the bradley is just a car with armor is what your saying? or is it a tank because I didnt mention it being an MBT.

    • @JJPlayzOnP5
      @JJPlayzOnP5 2 месяца назад

      @@a.girouard2988 and actually their armor isnt weak the armor package BRAT and others protect against RPG and light vehicles. The weaker gun is, yes, designed to provide cover to troops but theres also an ATGM and APFSDS rounds for a reason, tanks. The modern ATGM is either TANDEM or Top Attack ATGMs.

    • @JJPlayzOnP5
      @JJPlayzOnP5 2 месяца назад

      @@a.girouard2988 the thing is a tank i didnt say it was an MBT take the Main Battle off and you get tank. Main Battle.

    • @a.girouard2988
      @a.girouard2988 2 месяца назад

      @@JJPlayzOnP5 It's not. A. Tank. Of any kind. Not a main, medium or light tank. It was never designed to do that, and it does not meet the specifications of one. Tell you what: if you find any official U. S. military documentation that classifes a Bradley as a tank, then I'll stand corrected. You won't.

  • @robertterry5611
    @robertterry5611 2 месяца назад

    It isn't a tank. It is an armored personnel carrier.

    • @joellewis7168
      @joellewis7168 2 месяца назад

      I would say it's more IFC than APC

  • @billhart9832
    @billhart9832 2 месяца назад

    Mostly good but IVF is In Vitro Fertilization. The Bradley is an IFV, Infantry Fighting Vehicle! Huge difference and more than a little annoying to hear for almost the entire length of the video.

  • @darwindiaz5227
    @darwindiaz5227 3 месяца назад

    The best in the world

  • @sarumano884
    @sarumano884 2 месяца назад

    Add in many lessons learned by the Ukrainian Armed Forces

  • @darrenjones3681
    @darrenjones3681 3 месяца назад

    Is it me or have they lowered its profile? Like they saw cv90 and Ajax and thought mmm much cooler to have a lower profile

  • @fornoeyesonly3870
    @fornoeyesonly3870 2 месяца назад

    OLD NEWS- the 25mm goes to 50mm. uh huh

  • @yddraiggochaceman
    @yddraiggochaceman 2 месяца назад

    It's an IFV not an IVF.

  • @bigalon3wheels
    @bigalon3wheels 3 месяца назад

    I am very dubious about claims such as this for a weapon system. I do not see this vehicle as being battleground safer. Once it rolls over a 40 to 60 pound anti-tank mine or is hit by an IED with a couple of 155 MM projectiles as it power, good bye Bradley. Add more armor, the bad guys find better ways to defeat it. Add some drones firing weapons on the top, puff goes the magic dragon.

  • @darrenjones3681
    @darrenjones3681 3 месяца назад

    Bet the still don’t have the BV for hot water like British Armoured vehicles

  • @kenjudd1102
    @kenjudd1102 3 месяца назад +5

    More fake pictures

  • @idielmar
    @idielmar 3 месяца назад

    For Hollywood movies....

  • @kiko3194
    @kiko3194 3 месяца назад +1

    Is the Cummins engine Made in China???

  • @jtbheflin
    @jtbheflin 3 месяца назад

    Can it still swim?

    • @danielgall3729
      @danielgall3729 2 месяца назад +1

      The first M2A1 Bradley's had swim veins on them.

    • @jtbheflin
      @jtbheflin 2 месяца назад

      @@danielgall3729 I know I was an instructor on them in the 80’s when they first came out.

  • @MitchellCulberson-ko3cm
    @MitchellCulberson-ko3cm 3 месяца назад

    Battle Taxi.

  • @minhnguyen-mk9om
    @minhnguyen-mk9om 2 месяца назад

    sound good as long as it doesnt get hit by a canon projectile

  • @larrymead151
    @larrymead151 3 месяца назад +3

    Not a tank

  • @leighmurrell5494
    @leighmurrell5494 3 месяца назад

    Just a bigger target for missiles, drones etc. Obsolete technology like aircraft carriers.

  • @chuckhighlights5544
    @chuckhighlights5544 2 месяца назад

    Sucks what happens when bad guys shoot at all the costly gadgets small arms ?

  • @AndrewGraziani-k7d
    @AndrewGraziani-k7d 2 месяца назад

    Am I the only one who hates the Bradley? But then I find the whole concept of the IFV silly. They end up having many bad features without any real pluses. The only IFV worth it salt is the Merkiva.

    • @peterbaker8443
      @peterbaker8443 Месяц назад

      Merkava is a main battle tank

    • @AndrewGraziani-k7d
      @AndrewGraziani-k7d Месяц назад

      @peterbaker8443 True, but it's an MBT that can carry 8 troops in addition to its crew of 4.

  • @sidneyoreilly1135
    @sidneyoreilly1135 3 месяца назад

    How many were left for the taliban after they made you run from Afghanistan

  • @nicfarrow
    @nicfarrow 3 месяца назад

    When you make a fake thumbnail, try to get the sizes believable and the shadows pointing the same way!

  • @paulhart9102
    @paulhart9102 3 месяца назад

    EASY target. We never learn.

  • @Cosmo-ms2hd
    @Cosmo-ms2hd 3 месяца назад

    Can it fight an 800 drone with a bomb?.

  • @LoveHandlz
    @LoveHandlz 3 месяца назад

    Where's the Tank?

  • @1ntwndrboy198
    @1ntwndrboy198 3 месяца назад

    Isreal has a similar thing already.

  • @arthathcock5183
    @arthathcock5183 Месяц назад

    Germany & USA are going to field tanks almost three stories tall? Been smoking a few?

  • @BenTrem42
    @BenTrem42 3 месяца назад

    IFV ==> *_Tank?!_*
    0_0
    Brad is Brad.

    • @BenTrem42
      @BenTrem42 3 месяца назад

      3:22 ... _What acro did the narrator toss out? _*_IVF?!_*

    • @BenTrem42
      @BenTrem42 3 месяца назад

      _Eye-Bass ... _*_Eee-Bass_* ... AI narration. Oh.

  • @stuartcrane9409
    @stuartcrane9409 3 месяца назад

    We’ve all seen how good a Bradley is in Ukraine! There’s many destroyed Bradley’s! Stop the bull shit, a missile wreaks Bradley’s

  • @ddawsond
    @ddawsond 3 месяца назад

    "Come along as we reveal the secrets of how this machine has become even more deadlier and able to survive new threats."
    Yea nice. Improve our systems and then tell the world all about it.
    BTW, The Bradly is NOT a tank. It is an upgraded armored personnel carrier just as it has always been. Even when the people in Washington tried to get rid of it before Desert Storm because it was not and is not a tank. But then it has never been meant to go toe to toe with tanks unless absolutely necessary.

  • @EmekaTNwosu
    @EmekaTNwosu 3 месяца назад

    The Same Path as Hitler : GIGANTIC and more COMPLEX = LONGER and COSTLIER TO PRODUCE, MAINTAIN and REPAIR.😊😅😂

  • @sanchomorris6943
    @sanchomorris6943 Месяц назад

    First of all this is not a Tank

  • @dm55
    @dm55 6 дней назад

    EVERYTHING Really?

  • @DavidFMayerPhD
    @DavidFMayerPhD 2 месяца назад

    NOT a TANK.

  • @CarolynAnneRayner
    @CarolynAnneRayner Месяц назад

    It's not a damn tank, doesn't even look like one, the gun is clearly too small, but you acknowledge it fights along side Abrams, ok clickbaiter

  • @peterhulse1064
    @peterhulse1064 3 месяца назад

    It's not a tank. Do a little research pls.

  • @michaelhband
    @michaelhband 2 месяца назад

    👍👍👍

  • @williambailey8340
    @williambailey8340 3 месяца назад

    It's ifv not a tank

  • @ghostrider825
    @ghostrider825 3 месяца назад

    The so called high tech tank and other machines are in Russia ‘s museum 🤣🤣🤣

  • @morbiouslenoir
    @morbiouslenoir Месяц назад

    You know that the Bradley isn't a tank, right? So your title is a lie. Click bait. Why would I then respect or trust your information or opinion?

  • @שמואלברק-ש4ס
    @שמואלברק-ש4ס 3 месяца назад +1

    🇮🇱❤️👍💋🤗🇺🇸

  • @PedroLopez-bj6hq
    @PedroLopez-bj6hq 3 месяца назад

    Radioname E1A1 vision codename set nickname

  • @alicialovesmatt4e
    @alicialovesmatt4e Месяц назад

    very interesting video. ậd ándsama nà

  • @denzilkearse4215
    @denzilkearse4215 3 месяца назад

    OPSEC

  • @edcochran714
    @edcochran714 3 месяца назад

    Big ass target for drones, useless

  • @thomaslinton5765
    @thomaslinton5765 3 месяца назад

    NOIT EVEN A "TANK." REALLY PATHETIC.

  • @11B30Inf
    @11B30Inf Месяц назад

    This US Tank Will Change EVERYTHING.....First off the Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicle is not a Tank! So you used a clickbait title to get people to watch your channel.... I give 4 thumbs down for bull💩!

  • @JohnHill-k6p
    @JohnHill-k6p 3 месяца назад +1

    This is about the ad against Kamala Harris. Shown her laughing and having a good time like she’s enjoying people being hurt or killed it shows how desperate and how much of a liar. The people that made this ad truly are she may have in fact let somebody go, anybody that’s ever studied the law practiced the law knows that there are things you can and cannot do not just because you feel bad or you feel afraid or you don’t know what they may or may not do the law doesn’t work that way never has never should. And I guarantee you other other judges have released Johnny next door born and raised is white as white bread out on bail and they’ve committed other crimes and murdered other people. It’s a fact all this is doing is trying to scare you trying to make you believe something that just isn’t true but if you see it enough enough, you worry about it. There has always always been crime. There will always always be crime doesn’t matter who’s the president has nothing to do with it. Do you want to look at somebody to blame? Look at the politicians in Washington. Presidents only get eight years to improve or screw up something, the politicians have a lifetime decades upon decades who do you think is more responsible? And the Supreme Court has more power on what does or doesn’t happen then anybody they just keep a real low profile and hide behind their big desk in their robes like some secrets society and they manipulate our lives and they get to stay there forever. It’s your fault and my fault we the people we’re the ones that elect these officials and I don’t care if it’s a Democrat or Republican, they’re all, equally to blame and if you don’t believe that, you’re part of the problem you’re letting them play us and them game there is no us in them. There’s only us.

  • @h-f2726
    @h-f2726 2 месяца назад

    ....😅🤣🤣🤣

  • @fw1421
    @fw1421 3 месяца назад +2

    Zelinski wants 100 of them,of course he wants them for free! 😡

    • @barryklinedinst6233
      @barryklinedinst6233 3 месяца назад +1

      It's amazing how we give his people all this help. Our vets need help before they get help

    • @fw1421
      @fw1421 3 месяца назад

      @@barryklinedinst6233 I couldn’t agree more. The way Congress gives unlimited money to Ukraine and Israel but underfunds our troops and vets infuriates me. Once they leave the military they become invisible to them.

    • @curtischen8440
      @curtischen8440 3 месяца назад

      ​@barryklinedinst6233 how do you feel about former president who de-value CMH winners as less important than Medal of Freedom winner given to wife of Billionaire donor ?

    • @Lovepeacejustice
      @Lovepeacejustice 2 месяца назад

      Selfish people if you was Ukrainian wouldn't you need the help from terrorist..if it's not at your door you don't feel it ok.

    • @DonaldKarling
      @DonaldKarling 2 месяца назад

      He's doing fine with the old Bradleys we would have had to pay to scrap

  • @HENRISTARKS
    @HENRISTARKS Месяц назад

    Typical overpriced gold plated garbage endemic to usa military. No country wastes so much money on trash, that either doesnt work. Or requires Excessive Combat Service Support? Lifecycle expenditure are beyond Defense budget projections. GAO, and CBO have always chastised DOD for poor accounting and budgeting.procedures. There needs to be a bottom up review and full audit by Treasury Dept Inspectoe General.

  • @albedo0.392
    @albedo0.392 3 месяца назад

    PURE BS...ASK TO THE RUSSIANS

    • @JohnJohn-q8o
      @JohnJohn-q8o 3 месяца назад

      Yeah like the russian calling ukranian terrorist.. and crying when a russian civilian dies in an attack... When they deliberately attack ukrainian housing complez and hospitals

    • @JohnJohn-q8o
      @JohnJohn-q8o 3 месяца назад

      And ask them about the ukranian undersea museum around crimea.. go there ul find the hi tech naval asset of putin.. the most hi tech? The submarine that can stay underwater forever😅😅😅😅

    • @albedo0.392
      @albedo0.392 3 месяца назад

      @@JohnJohn-q8o Before the end of the year, Crimea and Donbas will be legally Russian. Ukraine lost the war. They are smashed in Kursk. Ukraine has only one option: Run. NOBODY MESSES WITH RUSSIA

  • @cartmanrlsusall
    @cartmanrlsusall 3 месяца назад

    Click bait garbage

  • @Sam-dm4kz
    @Sam-dm4kz 3 месяца назад

    2 shots from FPV drones cost less than 1k dollars this machine will bite the dust. Total waste of Taxpayers Money. Lol

    • @GymRat4Life01
      @GymRat4Life01 3 месяца назад

      Actually no, do you think the US military is sitting on its hands. Drones will be a new permanent part of war, however, imagine the amount of observers there are in Ukraine watching how these drones are being utilized. The US is likely spending hundreds of millions to mitigate this new drone strategy, but it's the less technically advanced armies that are going to be getting their asses kicked by drones for years to come.

    • @Dave05J
      @Dave05J 3 месяца назад

      Yeah you have to be able to hit it first.

    • @a.girouard2988
      @a.girouard2988 2 месяца назад

      @@Sam-dm4kz Lol... suddenly any and all forms of armored vehicles are obsolete in face of the might fleet of jury-rigged commercial drones.

  • @kenjudd1102
    @kenjudd1102 Месяц назад

    More fake pictures