ROLEX DAYTONA PANDA vs OMEGA SPEEDMASTER PROFESSIONAL 3861 fight night 2021

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 10 сен 2024
  • Please don't forget to like this video, subscribe to the channel and check out my other videos. I welcome any questions or review requests via email to justmyopinionuk@gmail.com
    Watch reviews, paid reviews and collection reviews as well as general watch talk and sharing my opinion. Please subscribe to the channel and check out my other videos.
    Any donations would be very appreciated via patreon / justmyopinionuk and will assist me in making the channel better for you guys. My Patreons also get money saving benefits and special private content. Thanks for watching and enjoy
    Thank you for watching
    Thumbnail from
    www.watchchron...

Комментарии • 90

  • @juanj.3549
    @juanj.3549 3 года назад +51

    Omega Speedmaster 3861 (2021), a technically superior time piece with a heritage that the Daytona simply can't match.

    • @986C
      @986C 2 года назад

      lol…

    • @986C
      @986C 2 года назад

      Sounds like it’s time for you to finance another Timex

    • @statusbohemio
      @statusbohemio 2 года назад +1

      you are right!! the daytona would never have the aura of the speedmaster. The design of the speedmaster also is way superior with the dome termoplastic crystal and the shape of the case. some people may say that the daytona has better finishing but the moonwatch keep the original design with no aplied index, aluminium bezel, etc

    • @gito4130
      @gito4130 2 года назад +2

      @@986C What a Snob. I've own Rolex, Omega, Tudor, Breitling, GS, Tag and yes Timex, Seiko, Glycine and Casio. Why try to put yourself above others.

    • @peterchon1179
      @peterchon1179 2 года назад

      @@986C noob... You clearly don't know your history.

  • @PhinallyWC08
    @PhinallyWC08 3 года назад +7

    As an owner of an 1861, I always say that if you have never handled a Speedmaster in person, it is so much more stunning of a looker than it shows on videos. Especially in lower, non fluorescent light - all of the details of the case shape/brushed vs polished bevels, and the domed hesalite crystal all pop

  • @kennethpouliot646
    @kennethpouliot646 3 года назад +4

    Rolex bores me because once you have one model you have all. All the sports models share the same bracelet, same case, same feel. So don’t get me wrong I absolutely love my Rolex submariner. I just have no desire to get another Rolex model. Now omega I could see myself owning a speedmaster, seamaster smp, and aqua terra. Absolutely beautiful watches with different bracelets, different feel on the wrist, different experiences

    • @johnpatricklopez
      @johnpatricklopez 2 года назад +1

      I don't have a Rolex but lots of my close friends do. I don't know why but I have no desire to own more than one if ever I'm given the chance. It's like if I get a GMT, no use for me to have a Sub. But I own Omega and I just keep on thinking which on is next. SMP300 on rubber , Planet Ocean on bracelet, Globe Master on leather, Aqua Terra on rubber, speedmaster on nato. It never ends! They all look good!

  • @MichaelSmith-fn1ci
    @MichaelSmith-fn1ci 3 года назад +4

    The Omega is an absolute classic in every sense and it’ll still be a classic long after the Daytona has aged with time. Both ultimately are nice watches, but in the real world most are unlikely to ever own a Rolex due to their “preferred” customer list, on that alone the Omega clinched the win!

  • @watchfalcon122
    @watchfalcon122 3 года назад +5

    Teased by the 321 in thumbnail which has unreal fit and finishing when seen in person. Some scoff at the asking price but once you handle the bracelet and see the movement you realize Omega took it to the next level.

    • @beagle101ful
      @beagle101ful Год назад

      Same. I own the 321, and was looking forward to the comparison.😅

  • @mendipfox1650
    @mendipfox1650 3 года назад +4

    Just don’t look at the Daytona under a Marco lense. The finishing is criminal for £10.5k. Truly.

  • @davidyule1973
    @davidyule1973 2 года назад +1

    Besides the Speedmaster being more iconic you are spot on with the point that you make regarding the price that you pay. If you take pretty much any Rolex and pay the same price for an Omega, the Omega will beat it every time. If we exclude diamonds on watches, Omega make watches costing much more than Rolex. The 321 Omega, Rolex don't have an answer to and never will as their niche is expensive machine made high quality watches and don't have the skills.
    Omega history aside which Rolex cannot much, but unfair to hold that against Rolex as they cannot go back in time, it amuses me that the general public actually believe that Rolex are superior to Omega. They compete in a similar space, albeit with Omega having a wider price spread, but have very different approaches. Both are very good at what they do and how they do it and a buyer cannot go wrong with either.

  • @tritone11
    @tritone11 2 года назад +2

    Yes the Rolex looks flashy. Yes it looks expensive. But it does - imho - not look good. From a strictly design standpoint - Omega any day of the week and twice on Tuesdays.

  • @heinrich3427
    @heinrich3427 3 года назад +6

    I loved the moon watch design 10 years ago, I love it today and I will love it in 10 years. This is the reason I'd take the Speedy over the Daytona any day of the week. It is just timeless. That and the Rolex design language just doesn't speak to me.

  • @barnpicks8884
    @barnpicks8884 3 года назад +5

    I’ve had Rolexes and other Omegas but the best experience i’ve had so far in a watch is the Omega Speedmaster. I wind it look at it and inspect hesalite glass and checks time which I would not experience in any other watches. My interaction with a Speedy is phenomenal! You honestly develop attachment to it plus it is iconic with a huge history backing.

  • @gito4130
    @gito4130 2 года назад +1

    I love both I own the Speedy 3861. I prefer the Speedy Moonwatch maybe because I can get it and because of its horological significance. However although I'm a purist I would have preferred Omega put a ceramic bezel at least offer it as an option with the sapphire sandwich. Once the warranty expires on my 3861 hesalite I will instal an oem sapphire back, that movement is gorgeous and I want to be able to glance at it and to show it. Next I will get a sub or sea dweller to have the perfect two watch collection and I think thats all the watches I will need other than my g-shocks.

  • @808Stevie
    @808Stevie Год назад

    What is that writing on the bracelet on the omega? Part number? Why did they put that on top, where it’s visible?

  • @KevW03
    @KevW03 Год назад

    The Daytona commands the price... but will always live in the Speedmaster's shadow.
    One is a safe queen and show off piece for the Nouvaux Riche, the other is a tried and (Nasa) tested, hardy, beautiful, tool.

  • @rooftopveg3477
    @rooftopveg3477 2 года назад +1

    The Daytona has bezel numbers upside down between 20 and 40 seconds or maybe you're supposed to hold it in your hand for timing?

  • @DerekCairns
    @DerekCairns 3 года назад +2

    Great video James, congratulations on owning both these iconic watches. I own the 1861 and love it, I have never owned a Daytona but have worn one, I would be interested at retail but can never see me paying the inflated prices. I find the games Rolex ADs play irritating and will never engage or encourage the aftermarket dealers either. I guess its the Speedy for me for the foreseeable future.

  • @wristwatch_holic9722
    @wristwatch_holic9722 3 года назад +3

    This is only Omega watch to keep beside 321. Nice comparison, showcase. 👍🏻

    • @mohnnadmercedes8246
      @mohnnadmercedes8246 3 года назад

      Rolex is king all brands are following Rolex steps
      Rolex is superior all brands inferior

  • @drek5740
    @drek5740 2 года назад

    Excellent job pointing out how different these really are and the comparitive feelings they elicit. Great video, don't change a thing.

  • @stonec2166
    @stonec2166 3 года назад

    Thank you for your honesty. One of the best reviews. I recently held a Speedmaster and it was a beauty, but after having bought a Submariner recently I gotta say that I’m totally sold on those Rolex Cerachrom bezels.

  • @stevesmith9943
    @stevesmith9943 3 года назад

    You're 100% correct in saying that the 2 watches cannot be compared.... The omega is the most perfect chronograph, arguably the most perfect watch at its price point (The rolex explorer fights it for the title I feel)...... I can't wait to try this new version on to see if I take to it or not (only ever tried a reduced on and that was over a decade ago) ... The Rolex Daytona IS the ultimate sports chronograph and you have the best modern iteration of it..... It has everything that you could want from a chronograph watch, the design, functionality and legibility, the durability, the true water resistance and the easylink comfort extension on the bracelet... But as you point out, this is a circa £20k watch (due to the Rolex game) whereas the speedy is a circa £4-5k watch...... I wish the Tudor black bay chrono would've been better designed as it could've stolen some of omegas thunder in the sense of what you're getting at the price point..... It has some good things going for it (the breitling column wheel movement, the build quality, the true water resistance in the screw down pushers, the symmetry) but its too flawed to be even considered against a speedmaster, the biggest gripe being the snowflake hand (bonkers) seconded by the case thickness.........

  • @Ge0rGi.
    @Ge0rGi. 3 года назад +3

    I never liked the Daytona ; I wouldn't pay even the retail for one ; never mind grey market prices. But man that speedmaster it's a beauty.

  • @BB-gl7zt
    @BB-gl7zt 3 года назад +8

    I adored the Daytona until it was pointed out to me that the middle of the two subdials do not line up to the 9 and 3 o'clock indices. That and the thinner lugs on the pusher side compared to the left side makes in unbalanced in my eyes. Speedmaster has none of those issues.

    • @showcasewatches3465
      @showcasewatches3465  3 года назад +7

      I’m not even looking at this as I don’t want to loose any love lol 😂

    • @986C
      @986C 2 года назад +2

      Here is what you don’t know… because of that you know it’s authentic. Fakes are all symmetrical.

  • @geezer8294
    @geezer8294 3 года назад +3

    how is your bracelet so scratched already? you only just got it a few days ago?

    • @showcasewatches3465
      @showcasewatches3465  3 года назад

      Hey Geezer. Which watch ? The Daytona I purchased pre owned unpolished, a 2019 model. The Speedmaster I’ve worn quite a lot since buying so will have marks related to use

    • @geezer8294
      @geezer8294 3 года назад +1

      @@showcasewatches3465 ah. makes sense. I was talking about the daytona - thought you purchased it new from the AD! anyways, congratz and enjoy it mate!

    • @showcasewatches3465
      @showcasewatches3465  3 года назад +2

      @@geezer8294 I wish lol, no I had to pay the big piper for this one unfortunately

  • @WrongTimeWatch
    @WrongTimeWatch 3 года назад +1

    I would be totally happy with either of these in my collection.

  • @motokult
    @motokult Год назад

    I personally like the Daytona better. But it’s much harder to get. You need a serious history of buying watches at the Rolex AD, before you get the privilege buying a steel Daytona for retail price. It’s like you said, The Mount Everest of all watches. I own four years the 🐼. I consider to buy the newest model Speedmaster. It has a lot of character, and I never owned one. Thanks for the review

  • @Kostja81
    @Kostja81 3 года назад

    In my opinion a better comparison would be Omega Speedmaster Racing vs Rolex Daytona 🙂
    The Moonwatch is more or less a Romantic period. And i love it :-D

  • @likeris2
    @likeris2 3 года назад

    I am big rolex fan, but I don't like daytona in steel, but I love speedmaster. if daytona then in two tone or in gold. speedmaster got that great looking caliber in case back and nice contrast on dial.

  • @blueshirtbuddah1665
    @blueshirtbuddah1665 3 года назад +2

    Excellent comparison video James! Congratulations on the new Daytona! Both the Rolex and the Omega are beautiful watches, wear them in good health. You are a true gentleman and a good friend. I’m so looking forward to having you on our show on June 6th!

  • @robertschmidt9584
    @robertschmidt9584 3 года назад

    Great video and really love forward to the notifications

  • @ryancoleman844
    @ryancoleman844 3 года назад

    Showcase great video..! Congrats on the Daytona. Now I have a question for you do you think it’s worth to pay for a Pepsi at the prices they are now.

  • @jimsteen911
    @jimsteen911 3 года назад +3

    i actually do not like the daytona at all. i think its over done. liike all those citizens dials that are too busy.. its a ugly watch! OMMEGGGA!

  • @patrickjean-philippe7679
    @patrickjean-philippe7679 Год назад

    It’s funny I find the Daytona overly hyped, excessively bling and it’s design is meh… But it’s good that people love it and fight for it.

  • @garrisong
    @garrisong Год назад

    The authorized dealer hates me too but I’d rather pay more than kiss a dealers behind but that’s just me.

  • @rank0utsider
    @rank0utsider 3 года назад +1

    Would love to find an AD near me willing to give 20% off on a new 3861...

  • @absoluteb22
    @absoluteb22 3 года назад

    Appreciated this video, interesting information.

  • @MyZippy13
    @MyZippy13 3 года назад +1

    I have the 3861 sapphire and the 1861 hesalite Speedmasters

  • @mrp9498
    @mrp9498 3 года назад

    Beautiful watches James nice to see them together.

  • @Saints-Forever
    @Saints-Forever 3 года назад

    Nice and sensible comparison. Can share how much you paid for the pre-owned 2019 Daytona just to know how crazy is the hype.

  • @stevemitchell7981
    @stevemitchell7981 3 года назад

    Another excellent review.

  • @christianhardwick6530
    @christianhardwick6530 2 года назад

    Jesus those reference numbers ?!? Especially on the Omeegahh

  • @marknv8
    @marknv8 2 года назад

    Love this video

  • @robertschmidt9584
    @robertschmidt9584 3 года назад

    Have one but not both. Great video

  • @Notourtube
    @Notourtube 3 года назад +1

    The picture in the thumbnail is the new 321 speedy. Great vid, thanks for the info!!

  • @Milofchg
    @Milofchg 3 года назад +3

    For me the Speedy wins, but I understand the hype of the Daytona. Both are very different watches for very different types of people. For me I feel that the dial on the Daytona is dated. It hasn't changed much since 1987. It's an icon but it never kept it's icon aesthetic, by that a true panda dial that's not busy. Rolex added bling over function. IMO the best Daytona's are the vintage Pal Newman Daytona's from the early 70's. NOW THAT"S when I would take a Daytona over the Speedy. To be honest I was never drawn towards a Daytona. It gave me the old man midlife crisis vibe. The Speedy looks vintage but it's youthful. It doesn't attract attention. The Speedy compliments the man. The Daytona outshines the man. They are very difficult to get at an AD but for $38k you can get a bunch of them used on Chrono24.

  • @redrum_5.021
    @redrum_5.021 3 года назад +2

    Great Video.. giving the people what they need.. love seeing those 2 side by side!!!

  • @ryansinger3783
    @ryansinger3783 3 года назад

    Upvoted👍🏻

  • @johncoyle8191
    @johncoyle8191 2 года назад +1

    Don't hate the speed master. But ask yourself this , if it hadn't been to the moon , would it be such a popular piece . 🤔

    • @kinwong4193
      @kinwong4193 2 года назад +2

      I think that's looking at it too simplistically. Would Michael Phelps or Usain Bolt be regarded as the best in their fields of they didn't win golds at the Olympics? They are rightly judged by their achievements.
      But it's also about the journey as much as the destination: the speedy passed the objective tests it was set by NASA (tests that the competition including Rolex failed) and so it proved it's quality both before and long after the moon missions (still the only watch certified for EVA).
      The other watches talk the talk, but this one has walked the walk.

    • @Mega-zi7ys
      @Mega-zi7ys 2 года назад

      @@kinwong4193 hahah yup!

    • @ThisHandleWasTheOnly1Available
      @ThisHandleWasTheOnly1Available 6 месяцев назад

      There's a flip side to that coin. Would Daytona have become such a hype piece, had it not been gifted to Paul Newman by his wife?

  • @robdove8341
    @robdove8341 3 года назад

    I'm also suprised nobody mentions the badly finished bracelet & clasp on the 3861...it's like wearing a cheese grater. Gonna try a Forstner/JB re-issue Komfit while my watchmaker polishes up the whole Band. Love the Daytona btw. I fancy an early 2000's 116520 with black dial & satin bezel.

    • @MichaelSmith-fn1ci
      @MichaelSmith-fn1ci 3 года назад +2

      Being a proud owner of the Speedy 3861 I don’t find the bracelet of clasp badly finished at all. Sharp by design, but really not cheese grater standard by any stretch of the imagination!

    • @robdove8341
      @robdove8341 3 года назад

      @@MichaelSmith-fn1ci So showcase filing down the front of his speedy clasp was unneccessary? The Case is "sharp by design" but is beautifully finished and completely smooth. Unfortunately the laser-cut metal pieces on the bracelet are not. Very easy to fix, but I didn't expect the bracelet would need polishing...not on a new luxury £5k watch. I did ask about this at my local A/D, thinking I might have suffered from bad quality control. But alas, I was told they're all like that.
      The other annoying thing is my 3861 runs slow, which isn't to spec & a pain to keep dead accurate.

  • @dooks85
    @dooks85 3 года назад

    another great video. you and I have 3 of the same watches and my viewpoints on those watches are fairly similar! explorer one and daytona are two essentials from rolex in my opinion. The aftermarket prices are really irrelevant if you collect watches and want the best. If rolex increased the msrp on a daytona to 30k for steel sports there will still be a waitlist around the block.

  • @986C
    @986C 2 года назад

    The Daytona’s are heading to the $100k territory

  • @Mark..P
    @Mark..P 3 года назад

    Great review and comparison James. Totally agree they are so different and brilliant in their own ways. Congratulations on the Panda and wear it in good health my friend 👏👌👊

  • @u.u.u9969
    @u.u.u9969 3 года назад +1

    The Daytona is more like an Aqua Terra
    The Speedmaster Moonwatch is its own thing.

  • @harry-eto
    @harry-eto 2 года назад

    15:30 haha, i did the same on the clasp of my SMP 300, too sharp.

  • @m.l.679
    @m.l.679 2 года назад

    Noob question : why is the Rolex called Cosmograph if it has no connection to space?

    • @anthonyl7519
      @anthonyl7519 2 года назад +2

      It competed to be the moonwatch but lost

    • @Mega-zi7ys
      @Mega-zi7ys 2 года назад

      Hahaha that's what I am asking too!
      Yet you will see rabid fanboys saying 3861 is a mere heritage piece of the 1 that went to the moon!
      The Daytona's forefathers haven't even left the Earth's atmosphere.
      😄

  • @philo2197
    @philo2197 3 года назад

    I’ve owned the new sapphire speedy for a month now and there are sharp edges and parts of the lugs as well. I’ve also handled several others in both sapphire and hesalite prior to purchasing mine and they all had sharp edges. With that said, it’s a beautiful watch and different from my Rolex watches however I’d choose my Rolex over my speedy any day of the week.

  • @grandsicko8580
    @grandsicko8580 3 года назад

    Nice.

  • @searay2621
    @searay2621 Год назад

    No offense but if you are going to do a video that shows your knowledge of watches, you should be pronouncing the name of the watch correctly. It's pronounced oh-meg-uh not om-eee-ga

    • @esisolina
      @esisolina Год назад

      No offence but you shouldn't assume you are pronouncing OMEGA the correct way and its the only way to pronounce it. Where I come from we pronounce OMEGA like this.......om-eee-ga. We are both correct, depends which part of our planet you come from.

  • @watch_MrG
    @watch_MrG 3 года назад

    Very well said. Nice review for these two great watches

  • @garytopley12
    @garytopley12 3 года назад +1

    Omega have caught up the Submariner with the Seamaster, very little between those 2 now. Speedmaster is a level below the Daytona, the Zenith Chronomaster is more comparable to the Daytona than the Speedy is.

  • @harry-eto
    @harry-eto 2 года назад

    One is glamour, one is heritage. Both have their place in the world.

    • @986C
      @986C 2 года назад

      Cute

  • @Marco-uo6np
    @Marco-uo6np 3 года назад +1

    Great side by side! UPVOTED!!

  • @jeffreywee2895
    @jeffreywee2895 3 года назад +1

    Without a date is worth for nothing as a dally wear.

  • @BB-gl7zt
    @BB-gl7zt 3 года назад +2

    Phirst

  • @panagiotisstamou6186
    @panagiotisstamou6186 Год назад

    ΩMEGA movement its Superior to Rolex Daytona