Sounds like a Replay of Black Berry business tactics. We're on top, no one can touch us, sell the same item rebranded over and over with minimal performance increases or features.
Blackberries couldn't connect to enterprise grade wireless without manually installing certificates, when the shittiest Android could do it straight out of the box. Blackberry, that thing that was synonymous with business...
100%, China ain't circling Taiwan for its country side views. They want the manufacturing plants. They're worth hundreds of trillions. Control the chips control the world.
TechAltar has a more nuanced take on this. It’s not that Intel refused to invest/innovate, it’s that they tried too many innovations at once and that slowed them down. TSMC focused on EUV and that more focused approach paid off.
Their fault! They slept for too long and made fun of us until AMD came out with the Ryzen CPU back in 2017. We had 14nm Intel CPUs for almost 6 generations, while AMD could not compete.
What you completely failed to mention is that the reason Intel is so money hungry right now isn't (just) because of ther past mistakes but also because Gelsinger is running an extremely aggressive strategy, trying to get through 5 nodes in 4 years. The development costs are monstrous and with Intel pretty much just skipping past them like they did the 20A process, there is no return on investment. How good the 18A process they'll be introducing at CES 2025 is will pretty much decide if Intel sinks or swims. If Intel has managed to catch back up and can match TSMC 2nm, they stand a fighting chance at succeeding with their foundry plans and finally building some modern processors in their own fabs again.
Exactly. Love the channel but this particular bit is a bit flakey analysis. Intel has been losing massive amounts of money these last few years primarily because of the massive capex on new cutting edge fabs. It's spending more on building new fabs than the current market cap of Intel's stock. Unless it was for a huge premium on current stock price, It would make absolutely no sense for Intel to sell the company at the moment before those fabs start producing chips. It's a big bet but a necessary one if Intel wanted to stay in the fab business. The American government is also helping Intel with huge subsides because it sees the fab business aa national security issue. Intel has also split off its fab business to make money from a new revenue source of its own competitors. If the fabs work as promised it would be a master stroke as it would also take away some of the semiconductor manufacturing services away from TSMC. As its new fabs open up In the next year or so intel is either going to be in huge trouble, or make a huge comeback. TBD,
@@Steamrick Interesting development. On one side is could mean he upcoming fabs are having problems with yields. On the other, it could relate to years of losses and massive drop in share price. Tough to say. I guess we will find out when new Clearwater chips roll out to mass production next year..
@@mydogsbutler We'll probably learn more when Intel presents their 18A process at CES. They'll have to say if they're on target and on schedule, after all.
Anytime there is a new techquickie just gotta watch keep up the great work! Been watching it since long before I went to study and now have a job in IT as a network engineer.
Samsung aint be buying Intel especially with its current yield issues in its own chip manufacturing and try to somewhat recover the lost of 100 billion dollars in its market cap.
From last month in Oct: "Intel says its Raptor Lake crashing chip nightmare is over" via the Verge. That being said, it still doesn't reinforce confidence with the Black Friday/Cyber Monday weekend sales on PCs with Raptor Lake-based CPUs. Nonetheless, ifanyone does take advantage of the sales going on, they should update their BIOs, if there are any updates, as soon as they open the box to prevent any permanent damage, because no chips were recalled as far as I remember.
I already made 30% profit on intel and in q1 I will make another 30%. Intel is a strategically crucial company for American government and it will never be sold.
I love these more specific detailed videos, especially with Riley in them. Perhaps it would be an idea to move the, seemingly defunct, Techlonger over to techquickie. The naming scheme of these videos goes better hand-in-hand compared to Techlinked where they currently live. This is also a call to return the Techlonger format, as I love these deep dives.
Essentially business men ran Intel into the ground with small incremental increased in performance and limited RND due to lack of competition. Then when competition blew past them they've been struggling to play catch up
Intel chips have fallen behind competitor chips but thats not the primary reason for selling off parts of the company and the huge losses. They needed the money because Intel has been pouring a staggering amount of capex building new cutting edge fabs. The total cost from 2023-2027 is probably going to be north of 200B. 2025 Intel's 18a will open for mass production. In 2026 or 2027 the 14a. On paper at least these plants are supposed to produce smaller transistors than anything TSMC can currently do. What remains to be seen is the yields. If they are too low that will hurt Intel;s bottom line in recovering those huge capex costs. In my opinion Intel will make a comeback even if it continues to struggle with its fabs. It's a national security for the Americian government to see Intel succeed since there are no other American companies that build competitive fabs. The government are pouring billions of subsides into Intel and pressuring American competitors to use Intel's new fabs. This will create an entirely new revenue stream for Intel and take away marketshare from TSMC for first time.
Great video. But I noticed, around the 1 minute mark that you guys really glossed over WHY Intel neglected to invest any money in new manufacturing technology. I think its extremely important to point out that this was a very deliberate decision by 2 successive CEOs (along with a board) who were all business people with degrees in business and zero education in science or engineering. For 20 straight years the company was directed by 'professional managers' who had little to no science/engineering background whatsoever. IMO that's extremely important context to understand what happened.
so the demand of Intel Chips was so large in the past that they needed to build new factories and invest to keep up with the demands of the customers .Now the demands are lower than in the past and they are loosing money keeping those factories running. Makes sense now
Qualcomm deal seemed doomed to failture.. They were almost certainly hoped to buy Intel on the cheap while stock price is low. Most of the money Intel has been losing is because of the huge capex its been pouring into building new cutting edge fabs (over 100B with more to be spent). It would make no sense for Intel to sell the company just before those fabs open for mass production..
I like the Intel NUCs. Great warranty and customer service too. Now turning to Geekom product line for mini-PC moving forward for my next NUC. Currently happy with my Intel NUC 13 Pro and casually gaming on my PS5.
If your out of the Dow then your in major trouble, being on the DOW allows companies to cruise on pension buys and other "safe bet" investments. Without that you actually have to be innovating(until you get back into the DOW at least)
I think intel should do what ARM does. License X86, work out a deal for the 64 bit extensions that AMD own. (maybe a share of the license fees)... And allow other manufacturers to make PC chips. It can then focus moving the platform forward. Inlucding offering manufacturing and consulting for core design.
I was curious to know whats going to be the future of PC architecture ? As the trends to focus on ARM architecture. How modular a ARM pc can be configured Will it not impact the freedom of switching components as our wish we do today. Just out of curiosity ! What If no x86 in mainstream anymore ?
Great video! Breaking 10 years of comment silence to ask you this- please stop with the fire alarm sound effects. They keep showing up in your videos and are very annoying.
Interesting you are talking about this “for sale” news but I highly doubt you read the fine print of the CHIPS Act funding which explicitly said Intel cannot sell fab to others. Intel will never be a fab-only or design-only company. There was a chance of selling segments but the Govt. fund restricts most, especially the key ones. So please, cover the entire story and not just which catches eyes and end up influencing consumer-investor(amature) decisions.
Qualcomm had interest in buying Intel. But after they looked more into some details, Qualcomm was like: "nah dawg, keep your company". Source: Tomshardware - "Qualcomm reportedly loses interest in Intel takeover"
Hey Techquickie thanks again for another great informative video! I have a request for a future episode (apologies if it has already been covered) about the difference between Intel XMP and AMD EXPO overclocking technology and how compatability works. I have done a little research about it and have not found any definitive answer. Some sources say for instance using Intel XMP-optimised RAM with an AMD system is ok, while other sources say it is problematic. I was wondering if you (or someone reading this) can rectify this confusion for me and any others who share my thoughts. Thanks
Everyone's known for years that x86-64 is a power hungry, dinosaur architecture and that ARM is the future. Dye shrinks have their nm limits and it's just trying to polish a turd at this point. The only reason it's around and will be for years is because of software compatibility, but that's already starting to change with x86-64 emulation and more dev tools to convert apps to native ARM easier. It'll be years from now before I'd ever even consider running Windows ARM in a business setting, but I accept that x86-64 is on its way out and we'll all embrace ARM
My current laptop is an i5 11th gen… and it is pretty good… I have a colleague whom has an i5 12th gen… both systems are good and stable. Reasonable battery life. Maybe they just need to step back and reformulate a plan. Similar as AMD with Ryzen 1st. Gen… Remember… competition is good for us the buyers.
I'd buy Intel just enough to make it make the right choices, but I don't have rich parents, let alone ones that like to visit that one island that must be ecological, because every one call it a E's Island...
I wish, but only if the new owners start listening to us consumers. But that'll never happen, as more profits every year are much more important than actually selling decent products.
I had to switch to Intel for H.264 decoding for my videos. If AMD can just build that into their processors, id be good to switch back. I hate that my Ryzen 5600g couldn't handle 4k 30 videos.
@@Drewkungfoodid the performance drop after the latest microcode update ?? I just built a new pc with 14700k it almost scored 20000 in geekbench multicore ( online scores ) but when I tested with the latest microcode update it only scored 15600 points
Intel wouldn't be able to sell their fabs for a lot of reasons: 1. The only American company that can produce chips with their foundry (at least similarly to TSMC) 2. No way in hell US would let their main technology company to sell their fabs and rely on TSMC 3. TSMC is in Taiwan and it's NOT in a good geopolitical spot 4. Intel wouldn't be able to print money at such scale like before without the fabs 5. The executives aren't stupid enough to follow some investors words just so the investors can make some cash at the expense of Intel Correct me if I'm wrong, you can add more points if you want
I agree, along with that. President Biden and coming president Trump are more focused on domestic production of goods. So I think theres going to be alot of bailouts for Intel for the next coming years. Now that's IF intel either can get its act together before bankruptcy. Or weather or not the coming Trump administration will help them. Which I'm willing to bet either administration isn't going to let it go under.
Intel have spent over 100 billion building new fabs. It seems highly unlikely that intel would sell its fab business just before their latest cutting edge fabs would open for mass production, on paper better than anything TSMC has. Their 18a will be releasing chips 2025, and their 14a high-na EUV ones will be releasing in 2026 or 2027. Assuming they can stick to schedule and yields are high (tbd), Intel are positioned to take the fab technology lead again for first time in decade.
Thanks to MSI for sponsoring this video! Check out their MPG 341CQPX QD-OLED monitor at lmg.gg/AWaaT
Never
Name seems like a top notch password lol
@@techquickie
Nice for the Channel, but I'll never buy MSI again, terrible Product support.
India will be happy to buy
Intel problem is TRASH windows 11 software
Linus should buy Intel! It'll be a tax write-off!
agreed
I'm pretty sure the smallest department at intel is still worth more than him and his entire company.
Can I be in the r/woooosh screenshot?
@@frostyhamster3116pretty much yeah
He might just turn it into something good.
Sounds like a Replay of Black Berry business tactics.
We're on top, no one can touch us, sell the same item rebranded over and over with minimal performance increases or features.
Blackberries couldn't connect to enterprise grade wireless without manually installing certificates, when the shittiest Android could do it straight out of the box. Blackberry, that thing that was synonymous with business...
What do you mean blackberry had a niche while intel is a duopoly in cpu industry for windows laptops and pcs
@@FMeister94 both sat on their laurels and not advancing.
@@FMeister94 whoosh
They should've done what Nvidia is doing right now: keep pushing despite being on top.
"MSI MPG 341CQPX QD-OLED monitor"
You know Riley had to do several takes to say it smoothly!
I really want to see the outtakes
These monitors always with long ass names
Riley will do every techquickie, gamelinked and techlinked from now on. He doesn't need sleep.
Riley is the goat. 🙏
Or maybe..., it's all because.., he is the tech himself 💀... Who knows..?
Of course he doesnt. He lives off tech news.
No. we need to see more of James.
shooting the material probably takes the least amount of time
Welcome back Quickie
I need that
I dont think the US would allow Intel be sold to a foreign company. Even if theyre from friendly nations.
Nasa end boeing kust as low sadly
👍
@@kiradead666sorry I’m brain dead I don’t understand
100%, China ain't circling Taiwan for its country side views. They want the manufacturing plants. They're worth hundreds of trillions. Control the chips control the world.
Some might argue that Israel is Intel's heart and soul.
TechAltar has a more nuanced take on this. It’s not that Intel refused to invest/innovate, it’s that they tried too many innovations at once and that slowed them down. TSMC focused on EUV and that more focused approach paid off.
The loss of Intel is the loss of CPU Competition.
ARM vs x86 is some form of competition
Their fault! They slept for too long and made fun of us until AMD came out with the Ryzen CPU back in 2017. We had 14nm Intel CPUs for almost 6 generations, while AMD could not compete.
@@stephanemignot100miniscule
Nah we new players in the game.
But that's what killed them in the first place sooo...
What you completely failed to mention is that the reason Intel is so money hungry right now isn't (just) because of ther past mistakes but also because Gelsinger is running an extremely aggressive strategy, trying to get through 5 nodes in 4 years. The development costs are monstrous and with Intel pretty much just skipping past them like they did the 20A process, there is no return on investment. How good the 18A process they'll be introducing at CES 2025 is will pretty much decide if Intel sinks or swims. If Intel has managed to catch back up and can match TSMC 2nm, they stand a fighting chance at succeeding with their foundry plans and finally building some modern processors in their own fabs again.
Exactly. Love the channel but this particular bit is a bit flakey analysis. Intel has been losing massive amounts of money these last few years primarily because of the massive capex on new cutting edge fabs. It's spending more on building new fabs than the current market cap of Intel's stock. Unless it was for a huge premium on current stock price, It would make absolutely no sense for Intel to sell the company at the moment before those fabs start producing chips. It's a big bet but a necessary one if Intel wanted to stay in the fab business. The American government is also helping Intel with huge subsides because it sees the fab business aa national security issue. Intel has also split off its fab business to make money from a new revenue source of its own competitors. If the fabs work as promised it would be a master stroke as it would also take away some of the semiconductor manufacturing services away from TSMC.
As its new fabs open up In the next year or so intel is either going to be in huge trouble, or make a huge comeback. TBD,
@@mydogsbutler And as of yesterday, Gelsinger is no longer CEO. We'll see how that goes...
@@Steamrick Interesting development. On one side is could mean he upcoming fabs are having problems with yields. On the other, it could relate to years of losses and massive drop in share price. Tough to say. I guess we will find out when new Clearwater chips roll out to mass production next year..
@@mydogsbutler We'll probably learn more when Intel presents their 18A process at CES. They'll have to say if they're on target and on schedule, after all.
What they really need is a hedge fund to come in and focus on profit over engineering.... that should fix them right into the shitter.
Hey, worked for Boeing!
@@richarddavis2605 my point exactly
Just made me spat out my tea
That shit would make them broke. This is a industry where huge amounts of investments have to be done.
Anytime there is a new techquickie just gotta watch keep up the great work! Been watching it since long before I went to study and now have a job in IT as a network engineer.
3:49 the “Caution: this rail will not support ANY WEIGHT” sign is awesome
Samsung aint be buying Intel especially with its current yield issues in its own chip manufacturing and try to somewhat recover the lost of 100 billion dollars in its market cap.
Intel is a great example of how putting non-technical MBAs in charge of extremely technical technology-driven companies can destroy them.
3:02 my next password
Losing competition is a bad thing so no, Intel must not go out.
From last month in Oct: "Intel says its Raptor Lake crashing chip nightmare is over" via the Verge.
That being said, it still doesn't reinforce confidence with the Black Friday/Cyber Monday weekend sales on PCs with Raptor Lake-based CPUs. Nonetheless, ifanyone does take advantage of the sales going on, they should update their BIOs, if there are any updates, as soon as they open the box to prevent any permanent damage, because no chips were recalled as far as I remember.
Time to buy Intel stock
I hope it doesn't drop to $7 and stay there for the next 25 years like Sony did 💩
Not financial advice@@shapourdashtpour63
If you bought Intel stock in 90s for ~20-25 USD, I have some bad news for you ;)
Intel hurt my portfolio
Right. Next year is intel at 40 and 2027 if intel gets some customers for 18a we gona see fast 100US. The years after that fireworks.
Ah, yes - gaming "Intellignece". Being unable to spell intelligence helps to instill confidence.
confidnece.
6:44 MSI has misspelled intelligence, which doesn't give me confidence in their "intellignece" ba-bow
That's a nice and easy to remember monitor name you got there MSI.
Intel needs to make a RISC-V product line that can actually compete with ARM for a change
Hopefully Intel does a comeback because if not then AMD will become a monopoly.
I have 400$ , can I buy intel?
@@phaylali yes
@@DivineVegan cool , I'll save intel in no time
Youre in luck, the asking price is tree fiddy
intel is 50 billion in debt, so if you also have that kind of money to repay, yes then you can go ahead
I already made 30% profit on intel and in q1 I will make another 30%. Intel is a strategically crucial company for American government and it will never be sold.
AMD with Zen Architecture
and Apple making their own chips is like the kick in the balls Intel needed 😂
I love these more specific detailed videos, especially with Riley in them. Perhaps it would be an idea to move the, seemingly defunct, Techlonger over to techquickie. The naming scheme of these videos goes better hand-in-hand compared to Techlinked where they currently live. This is also a call to return the Techlonger format, as I love these deep dives.
it would be absolutely hilarious if walmart bought some sizeable part of intel. I would find that legitimately funny.
Essentially business men ran Intel into the ground with small incremental increased in performance and limited RND due to lack of competition. Then when competition blew past them they've been struggling to play catch up
Some companies need a constitution.
Intel shouldn't have cut their research. Maybe a fixed % being earmarked
The stock is HOT, like their products!
5:31 I immediately heard the alterra jingle from Subnautica when he mentioned Altera
I'm glad I wasn't the only one 😂
Riley is the reason why i open RUclips
I mean, they had sold their SSD division to SK Hynix for about 3 years ago. Which it just shows that they were already declining.
Intel chips have fallen behind competitor chips but thats not the primary reason for selling off parts of the company and the huge losses. They needed the money because Intel has been pouring a staggering amount of capex building new cutting edge fabs. The total cost from 2023-2027 is probably going to be north of 200B. 2025 Intel's 18a will open for mass production. In 2026 or 2027 the 14a. On paper at least these plants are supposed to produce smaller transistors than anything TSMC can currently do. What remains to be seen is the yields. If they are too low that will hurt Intel;s bottom line in recovering those huge capex costs.
In my opinion Intel will make a comeback even if it continues to struggle with its fabs. It's a national security for the Americian government to see Intel succeed since there are no other American companies that build competitive fabs. The government are pouring billions of subsides into Intel and pressuring American competitors to use Intel's new fabs. This will create an entirely new revenue stream for Intel and take away marketshare from TSMC for first time.
Great video. But I noticed, around the 1 minute mark that you guys really glossed over WHY Intel neglected to invest any money in new manufacturing technology. I think its extremely important to point out that this was a very deliberate decision by 2 successive CEOs (along with a board) who were all business people with degrees in business and zero education in science or engineering. For 20 straight years the company was directed by 'professional managers' who had little to no science/engineering background whatsoever. IMO that's extremely important context to understand what happened.
so the demand of Intel Chips was so large in the past that they needed to build new factories and invest to keep up with the demands of the customers .Now the demands are lower than in the past and they are loosing money keeping those factories running. Makes sense now
Qualcomm isn't even mentioned once in the video. What a shame!
Qualcomm deal seemed doomed to failture.. They were almost certainly hoped to buy Intel on the cheap while stock price is low. Most of the money Intel has been losing is because of the huge capex its been pouring into building new cutting edge fabs (over 100B with more to be spent). It would make no sense for Intel to sell the company just before those fabs open for mass production..
This acquisition would be absolutely horrible for consumers and competition.
“Gerry, charge up the electric scooter, we gotta go to Walmart!”
Nice to see you back
I like the Intel NUCs. Great warranty and customer service too. Now turning to Geekom product line for mini-PC moving forward for my next NUC. Currently happy with my Intel NUC 13 Pro and casually gaming on my PS5.
riley is forever the best lmg host
EUV would not have been ready for the original launch of the 10nm node, that's the actual reason Intel did not use it.
the only company that could actually buy intel and they didn't mention in the video is Qualcomm.
If your out of the Dow then your in major trouble, being on the DOW allows companies to cruise on pension buys and other "safe bet" investments.
Without that you actually have to be innovating(until you get back into the DOW at least)
Imagine arm becomes the standard in 2030 and x86 is emulated
Imagine that both x86 and ARM architectures are very old. Older than ATX standard and as old as AT standard.
TechQuickie, TechLinked, GameLinked... how many channels do you guys need?
No one is too big to fail.
Unless the government steps in 😀
@LubosMudrak well yea.😀 But the same goes for the government
Yes the Intel DMV CPU. Take the slip your game will load on 2 to 3 hrs
I think intel should do what ARM does.
License X86,
work out a deal for the 64 bit extensions that AMD own. (maybe a share of the license fees)...
And allow other manufacturers to make PC chips.
It can then focus moving the platform forward. Inlucding offering manufacturing and consulting for core design.
Didn't they already do that to AMD, VIA, etc?
@@zulfika_Yeah but so far only AMD survived the X86 war and others were dead (look up Cyrix)
Riley should redo every tech quickie for a 1,001 special.
The best i can do is 150$, take it or leave
i guess we doin less now
If amd bought Intel then it would be madness
The loss of Intel is like losing blockbuster or blackberry.
Publicly traded companies are not sold in whole, they're acquired.
Did... I just see January *2020* described as "3 years ago"?
Leap years, amirite?
Soon to be 4 years ago
It must have been all those Intel $5000 Extreme Tech Upgrades.
I'm old enough to remember the Intel math issues. They've never really been the same since.
Riley's Moustache seems to be quite busy these days.😂
Thanks for the video!
Short answer is yes. Some parts of it are for sale. They need the funds to continue on whatever they think is the better investment.
3:30 “GAMING INTELLIGNECE APP”
intellignece….
Oh the irony 😂
5:19 me encanta como dice "enchilada"
That MSI (sponsor) product name. Riley, did you do that in one take?!?!?!
I was curious to know whats going to be the future of PC architecture ? As the trends to focus on ARM architecture. How modular a ARM pc can be configured Will it not impact the freedom of switching components as our wish we do today.
Just out of curiosity ! What If no x86 in mainstream anymore ?
a loss of reputation, customers and investors because of degrading products and some other things truly hurts.
I went for AMD for those reasons.
Great video! Breaking 10 years of comment silence to ask you this- please stop with the fire alarm sound effects. They keep showing up in your videos and are very annoying.
We saw you trying not to laugh repeating the name of the OED display, Riley
Interesting you are talking about this “for sale” news but I highly doubt you read the fine print of the CHIPS Act funding which explicitly said Intel cannot sell fab to others. Intel will never be a fab-only or design-only company. There was a chance of selling segments but the Govt. fund restricts most, especially the key ones. So please, cover the entire story and not just which catches eyes and end up influencing consumer-investor(amature) decisions.
The way it seems, Intel could be given the grace Chrysler had in 1979 with a bail out by the US government, in order to prevent job losses.
Chips act has conditions stating that Intel must keep a majority stake in it's foundary business if it attempts to spin it out as a standalone company
AMD and Intel aren't the only companies making x86 CPUs. Even if you disregard "retro-x86 architectures" there's still Zhaoxin operatin on VIA license
Qualcomm had interest in buying Intel. But after they looked more into some details, Qualcomm was like: "nah dawg, keep your company".
Source: Tomshardware - "Qualcomm reportedly loses interest in Intel takeover"
are you like 10 years old that you are spreading baseless rumors spread by fanboys?
My identity- and the information the green brothers and Emily Graslie extracted, is not for sale.
I need to see it. End of story.
The dress is blue btw
Hey Techquickie thanks again for another great informative video!
I have a request for a future episode (apologies if it has already been covered) about the difference between Intel XMP and AMD EXPO overclocking technology and how compatability works. I have done a little research about it and have not found any definitive answer. Some sources say for instance using Intel XMP-optimised RAM with an AMD system is ok, while other sources say it is problematic. I was wondering if you (or someone reading this) can rectify this confusion for me and any others who share my thoughts. Thanks
WIth the charisma of Gelsinger on stage, how could this happen??
That ad read taught me the alphabet
Everyone's known for years that x86-64 is a power hungry, dinosaur architecture and that ARM is the future. Dye shrinks have their nm limits and it's just trying to polish a turd at this point. The only reason it's around and will be for years is because of software compatibility, but that's already starting to change with x86-64 emulation and more dev tools to convert apps to native ARM easier.
It'll be years from now before I'd ever even consider running Windows ARM in a business setting, but I accept that x86-64 is on its way out and we'll all embrace ARM
Are we forgetting where most intel chips are made.
I'mma go talk to Satya Nadella, Microsoft Intel.. here we goooooo.
My current laptop is an i5 11th gen… and it is pretty good… I have a colleague whom has an i5 12th gen… both systems are good and stable. Reasonable battery life.
Maybe they just need to step back and reformulate a plan.
Similar as AMD with Ryzen 1st. Gen… Remember… competition is good for us the buyers.
I don't think AMD would be allowed to buy Intel as they would get CPU monopoly on PC and and prices would sky rocket.
Thunderbolt is intel IP/product right?which one more profitable and less future loss, sell thunderbolt IP, or keep it
I'd buy Intel just enough to make it make the right choices, but I don't have rich parents, let alone ones that like to visit that one island that must be ecological, because every one call it a E's Island...
I wish, but only if the new owners start listening to us consumers. But that'll never happen, as more profits every year are much more important than actually selling decent products.
Great video. But i thought TQ was on hiatus?
They still got that gpu department, They have been working on quietly.
I had to switch to Intel for H.264 decoding for my videos. If AMD can just build that into their processors, id be good to switch back. I hate that my Ryzen 5600g couldn't handle 4k 30 videos.
Sure !
thankfully my 13900K has not endured any issues.yes UE5 games were crashing, but stopped with the latest Microcode Update with the latest Bios Version
It's too late. Especially if you had/are seeing WHEA 17 & 19 errors. RMA while you can, there will be NO supplies later.
@ if any problems arise I’ll swap to the 9950X and x870. Worst of the worst case scenario. For now I am chillin
@@Drewkungfoodid the performance drop after the latest microcode update ??
I just built a new pc with 14700k it almost scored 20000 in geekbench multicore ( online scores ) but when I tested with the latest microcode update it only scored 15600 points
6:33 wow, that's an i7 4790K
Wow!!!
I still use it on my pc
Absolute banger
Intel wouldn't be able to sell their fabs for a lot of reasons:
1. The only American company that can produce chips with their foundry (at least similarly to TSMC)
2. No way in hell US would let their main technology company to sell their fabs and rely on TSMC
3. TSMC is in Taiwan and it's NOT in a good geopolitical spot
4. Intel wouldn't be able to print money at such scale like before without the fabs
5. The executives aren't stupid enough to follow some investors words just so the investors can make some cash at the expense of Intel
Correct me if I'm wrong, you can add more points if you want
I agree, along with that. President Biden and coming president Trump are more focused on domestic production of goods. So I think theres going to be alot of bailouts for Intel for the next coming years. Now that's IF intel either can get its act together before bankruptcy. Or weather or not the coming Trump administration will help them. Which I'm willing to bet either administration isn't going to let it go under.
Intel have spent over 100 billion building new fabs. It seems highly unlikely that intel would sell its fab business just before their latest cutting edge fabs would open for mass production, on paper better than anything TSMC has. Their 18a will be releasing chips 2025, and their 14a high-na EUV ones will be releasing in 2026 or 2027. Assuming they can stick to schedule and yields are high (tbd), Intel are positioned to take the fab technology lead again for first time in decade.
LTT should buy it. 🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞
I don't think CPU's would be branded Great Value, that sounds more like an ONN brand type of item.
maybe they could get good with GPU manufacturing, I would think that would keep their fabs busy
A well researched history lesson!
Interesting. Thanks!
When will we get news on LTT (Linus Tech Town)?
what is up with the hiatus?