India in Egypt: Antiquity Of Indian Civilisation - A New Perspective - By Tilak Ranjan Bera
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 сен 2024
- For related Indic Talks and Indic Courses, see
Website - www.cisindus.org/
Facebook - / cisindusuniversity
Twitter - / cis_indus
Indic Talks : www.cisindus.o...
Indic Courses : www.cisindus.o...
Indic Varta : www.cisindus.o...
Let me see if I understand you correctly... the Indians (not Africans) who created ancient egyptian civilization have been demonstrated by academia to:
1. Speak an African language (Ref. C. Ehret)
2. Practise an African culture (Ref. Wallis Budge)
3. Morphologically clustered with southern Africans (Ref. Sonia Zakrzewski)
4. Have ABO typing matching that of Western Saharan Haratins (Ref. G Paoli)
5. Have "super-negroid" body plan (Ref. G Robins)
6. Have STR markers matching predominantly southern africans/great lakes/tropical west Africa/Horn of Africa (DNA Tribes).
Wouldn't these facts make these founding immigrant Indians Africans & not Indians?
They are so full of themselves they live in lies lol, their whole history is like that.
This wonderful news - is known to Raja yoga meditators, also. India first and linked later - with Egypt
Ancient superpowers - spirituality/philosophy and tech and culture. (Heartfulness)
May it continue - to inspire - the world.
Fare thee well
The vision - of the Yogic Masters - is far advanced - as it has always been and will always be.
This mystic knowledge - is given to those pure of heart and balanced mind - only.
We are talking now - of ancient ties - of India (Bharat) and Egypt.
Fare thee well.
@@user-hy9nh4yk3p quit the gibberish
If this fact was correct that humans originated in India, then why are all diverse array of animals and species predominantly originate from Africa, and continue to do so?
He never said Humans originated in India , he said when humans moved out of Africa , India was the place they settled. After that they populated other parts of the world.
@@statickk14 the birth place of humans is the horn of africa and yemen
the birth place of humans is the horn of africa and yemen
@@statickk14 wrong! From Africa they went all over not what his saying.
@@andreamessiasgomes7118 proper English please
the ancient egyptians were cushitic people like the somali and afar tribe who now live in the horn of africa they moved down for better trade routes and more land for camels we are E1b1b and T haplogroup like most afro asiatic cushitic and semitic not r1b but i have found words we share with sanskirt tho we look more similar to dravidians the few connections i found with ancient egypt and indian is the lotus flower and the creation story of coming from lotus stem which can be seen on the falsey named dendera light
The Egyptian Lotus is actually a Lilly unlike the Indian lotus it's not the same! You won't find the Egyptian Lotus in India! Egyptian Lotus is blue while Indian lotus are big in light pink and white.
Indeed, the ancient Kemetic civilization comprised individuals of Nubian, Somali, and Horn of Africa descent, as well as those from South, Central, and West Africa and the Green Sahara.
No single tribe exclusively constructed ancient Kemet, as evidenced by the inability to replicate it. Instead, it arose from the convergence of diverse tribes, a perfect storm of collaboration and conflict that birthed the greatest civilization in ancient Kemet through warfare and cooperation.
You need to study 'Out of Africa 'model this is where everything started.
Most of the founders look West Africa who brought the math and science... this is where you find the West have some of the smartest people in math.
ruclips.net/video/V9VL8YC-C4s/видео.htmlsi=C70hiPCoHiMsAWL0
Six days ago in NEW YORK - A Nigerian chess champion and child education advocate played chess nonstop for 60 hours in New York City's Times Square to break the Guinness World Record for the longest chess marathon. That ancient Kemet DNA.
ruclips.net/video/OXzyfXZQavQ/видео.htmlsi=ETiZF-ZeQcK_7YzB
The same African Chess Master Played 10 Opponents At The Same Time In Germany And Won All GAMES.
ruclips.net/user/livejRU-UlpnB60?si=pSGKoeQUQqfvCSjj
@@andreamessiasgomes7118 i know ones blue and ones pink but its still similar concept that they both like the same or similar plant but thanks for informing me sister
@@Kemet3.0 it was made by cushitic tribes not west african tribes bro
@@andreamessiasgomes7118 the blue lotus water lilly and indian lotus have similar fuctions both grow out of the water hindu believe vishnu came from a lotus stem in the ocean and the ancient egyptian also believe something similar the origin of the world was taught to have been when the sun god Ra emerged from a lotus flower growing in primordial waters
Lotus is not a natural flower of Egypt?
Please do thus in Hindi and all the Indian languages for better reach. Thank you
Am telling you your just wasting your time 🤣
I really appreciate it, matches with my thought process
Sad that you've been misguided
People are so so gullible!
I am sure sir that u are thinking in the right path. Because I know this for a fact, and the world will know it soon ❤
They will know that y'all were fools that's all.
@@andreamessiasgomes7118it's hard to accept I see 😂..
@@diablodelmundo6487 for you right ofcourse, keep believing in delusions.
Bharat, the mother of all civilizations without any doubt!
No!
@@andreamessiasgomes7118 It was at least the oldest civilization, and obviously the oldest continuing civilization.
Mesopotamia is the oldest civilization. Stop trying to steal other people’s history.
@@keith.anthony.infinity.h Mesopotamia might be very old, but the Rig Veda itself is older than that.
@@abhijitreddy7376 The Rigveda's core is accepted to date to the late Bronze Age, making it one of the few examples with an unbroken tradition. Its composition is usually dated to roughly between c. 1500 and 1000 BCE.
Source: Wikipedia
The Sumerians were the people of southern Mesopotamia whose civilization flourished between c. 4100-1750 BCE.
Source: World History Encyclopedia
Out of Afrika, next wave Australian Aboriginals, Sri Lanka, Andaman Islands, probably then South India.
Northern India inhabitants were from Egypt, Nagas tribes.
Sir please let evidence speak for itself, don't force feed the masses.
This is so amazing!
So your a lover of lies
Haplotyping of populations have been used to identify the ethnic groups, but what is the statistical significance of this haplotyping given the heterogeneity itself. In other words what is the accuracy of this typing are there any other type of genetic identification. Mixing of races or ethnic group over a fertility period of around forty years in one lifespan should be able to give rough estimates of population defining a family, but other socioeconomic factors determine the migration profiles and social heirarchy, standards of living or lifestyles. This should be debated within the ethnic migration of indoeuropean groups over historical periods, rather than using climate as the only factor. There are other reasons, war, disease, life expectancy etc.
This in itself says Indians are of multiple races that have come together, no wonder they are called curry lol.
Yes finally!!!! It was ruled by Afro Asians with curly hair according to ancient depictions, the Ancient Egyptians were Asiatic Ethiopic /Maya which are the Ethiopian (HabShi dynasty) of Pakistan aka Siddi people of all of Asia, proof is that Ethiopia once ruled Egypt for over hundred years and the enslaved jews were also Ethiopian jews.
When I speak of Ethiopia I am speaking of a time when it was all one which included the "newly separated middle east" Ethiopia even included the Americas which has large Ancient Egyptian population with over 2 Million descendants out side of Saudi Arabia and lower Egypt and scattered throughout world Asia.
It is Known that there was an Ethiopia in the Southwest of what is now called "India" since it was renamed in 1947. It is time Asia needs to reclaim what is now called "Africa", it was known as Alkebulan and many other names throughout time.
However the name Africa was named a continent between 1945-1960, the African Union was formed between 1911-1916. It is a very new concept. The Berlin conference was in 1884-1886 where the plan to construct "Afrique" began. In the 1730’s Afrique people were known and depicted as white Cauc-Asian. Africa is barely 200 years old
Prior to pale Romans were known as Africans in honor of the Roman General Scipio Cornelius Publius Africanus. Scipio was hailed a victor for conquering the "Afro Asian Indians" by defeating Hannibal in the Punic war.
The only tribe today known as Africans /Afrikaners are dutch. Herodotus wrote about Hannibal being an Indian and because people want to shape the narrative of so called brown and black complected people being Indians before the country India was ever thought of people were called Indio/Moreno/Morena in wherever the spanish language was spoken.
Yes, It is a fact that India is a spanish word. In the Americas the Indians were known mostly known as spanish Indians of the East Indies and the West Indies. Until they were sold to the other colonies who didn't speak Spanish or Portuguese they developed Creole languages because of the colonial master was either the Dutch or the French or the English/ British.
The Americas is also known as India Superior by the dutch and the British. It is also known that combined there are at least 4 or 5 Indias throughout world Asia. Check out the structures in Peru South America that are similar to the ones in the region of what was once known as "Hindustan". Now called India and compare the similarities. I think it is quite amazing there is evidence of great empires before the ones that rule today.
The truth is when the "Ethiopian Indian" was thought to be concurred Africa became a slave hub, many of the tribes were bought to Africa as a place to transport the indigenous people as the colonies saw fit around the world. This did not happen to the people in the Americas as it was so popularly taught. As a matter a fact they took many people from the Americas and took them to Africa.
How come RA1 and RB1 which is present in punk shade in bangladesh is not present in resy of the India?
I am telling you it's all nonsense
We used to rule all over the earth at the time of Sri Ram. Even in Mahabharat there is a mention of rule of Bharat over the world.
Quit all these bs claims
@@TingTong2568
Hey Tong, did you read Mahabaratha or Ramayan? No. Ramayan has precise details of the routes taken by the messengers to reach Bharatha, who was in Russia at his maternal uncle's house. Hanuman's journey to reach Lanka and the minute details of the people, how they looked, what they ate, where they lived, and how they dressed are mentioned.
The various islands present at the time are also mentioned.
Mahabaratha has details of cloning, Test tube babies, lines, weapons vehicles, army formations, and atomic bombs. Read them if you don't believe them. Just don't trash something without even knowing the ABC of those epics.
These epics are not like the Bible. There is no proof or even the details of any of those characters in it. They keep adding new versions because they don't know what the truth is. If it was true, they wouldn't bring out so many versions, unlike Mahabaratha and Ramayan, which have one author only.
@@lokkich487
Hey Hindoo, of course i've heard, read about Mahabharata and Ramayana(you can't even spell and pronounce it properly because you are a Hindi speaking person). I have chanted all those names when praying during my younger days. Bharata was in Russia? What drugs are you taking?
Mahabharata mentions cloning, test tube babies, lines and atomic bombs? Yeah, this is called hindoo mythisism. False claims based on imagenary stuff told by these stories. No formula blueprints or methods to create it. So where are those technologies went until indians became so stupid afterwards till others (re)invented it later? Btw, all ancient civilization has weaponary vehicles and systematic army formations. It is written in ancient records which was discovered by archeologies. Unlike in india where none of such ancient records such as the rosetta stone exist.
There are other mythologies around the world has such stories of exploding weapons, flying land creatures & etc. Just stories but no evidence of it's existence. Those are all quite primitive societies back then. Anybody can write anything based on their imagination, that dosen't prove all those were mentioned existed back then. Just as i mentioned, no archeological evidence to back up all these claims made by hindoos and this makes them a laughing stock around the world.
On the Bible, yes most of the stories are crappy but at least it mentioned many existed kingdoms and civilizations such as egyptian, sumerians, akkadians, babylonians, assryians, Hitites, Mitannis, Phonicians, Canaanites, Elamites & etc. All these kingdoms and civilizations has archeological proof of their existence. So where are the evidence of these claims made by all these Hindoo myths? NONE!
Can you provide information about the oldest copy of Ramayana and Mahabhrata epic still existing today? I bet it dosen't even go beyond a 1000 years old.
Lol what a joke @@lokkich487
@@andreamessiasgomes7118
Where's the joke? I don't see any? Ah now I see, you are the bloody joke!
Don't have the guts to read the epics, and you think you know all!
Research project can be done
Trade may be existed
If you make this video Hindi language better for all. Who's understand Hindi.
Don't waste your time
@@andreamessiasgomes7118 That's Historical Knowledge, Many wants understand this topic. Who's not Knowing English language.
This guy doesn't know who is black Madonna..he just makes a blunder by avataring everything According to his belief
Yup
In these times there were just ancient humans, not some weirdo nationalists. I am sure if you asked ancient Egyptians if they decended from Indians, they would laugh at you as there was no nation of India, just tribes living east of the kush mountains. This is so silly. Where does nationalism belong in a nation-less world
Very very interesting 🙏
Nobody says Indians came from Europe. Sanskrit came via the Aryans from central Asia.. Not Europe. They migrated and mixed. Not invaded
Source: trust me bro or whatssapp university. 😂
@@diablodelmundo6487 based on scientific evidence published in both Cell and Nature, pal. Unlike 'evidence' from Indian tales, myths and blue-faced fictional gods.
People did not travel thousands of miles in ancient times travelling through summer mountains deserts cold dry hot climates , migrations was very slow in ancient times today you can travel through planes in 18 hours
German and French language all they developed 15th-century after came to Keralam India !!!
So it came from Kerala 🤣
Make the heading as NORTH INDIA IN EGYPT 🤣🤣🤣 or invaders of India in egypt
No, bro Tamil is found in Egypt 😮
@@tattvamashi he is being facetious.
@@vanniking8183 ?
JESUS
Maybe Indian was in Egypt just for trading nothing more that sorry 👉👉😢😢😢😢
He should have done a thorough review of the neglected masterpiece INDIA IN GREECE
Your milestones of culture are wrong Pl start again There was no indo Aryan influx is a figment of thought
Indo Aryans moved out the people of Naga land east ward creating Bharat.
@@kingkai9818 re read what you commented and tell me if it makes sence 🙄
I have started to believe in the OUT OF INDIA theory.
Grandfather of 'Lucy' had migrated to Africa to escape the British Colonisers.
No wonder India doesn't progress
Indian history must be established chronologically that is there was no india , present history interms of kingdoms that will be much factual.
Your point being? You think they will ever do that? They will loose, they are frightened that's why they are finding ways to make stories.
@@andreamessiasgomes7118 First, try to write with proper grammar if you want to be taken seriously. More importantly, though, the concept of Bharatavarsha as a spiritually-oriented civilisation has been around for at least a few thousand years. It's hardly surprising that converts to the Abrahamic faiths are unable to face these verities, this said.
Bharata as a civilisational 'state' has existed for a few thousand years at least. Even 'India' comes from the Greek Indica, a term the ancient Hellenes were using to refer to the subcontinent in BCE times. So, you can keep your so-called facts to yourself.
@@vikramsoondur6891 is this an English exam? What convert are you talking about? Are you psycho?
Psychosis
❤️💛💚
Wtf😭
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
This guy has been debunked guys !
Check out museum of Cairo. 😊
@@SJking-gk4go lol your here too
I'm a truth seeker, what can I say..🤷♂️
@@SJking-gk4go good! so what do you think about what this guy says? do you agree 😅🤣? I think they are trying to play uno reverse on us 😂.
@@andreamessiasgomes7118
Akenaten and Tut an kamun speaking from the tombs. ☻️
just state your sources and stop with the rest of the hablado
Don’t talk like this to anyone . Have some respect for the age and experience 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
@@vijayabhaskaransankaran5349 respect should not be given to such types of people who try to see similarities and think it's the same and he's already been debunked, he didn't use common sence so obviously failed!
@@andreamessiasgomes7118 The world is one family and we are all connected. Thats the commen sense.
@@vijayabhaskaransankaran5349 that is obvious but most of these people are trying to say everything happened in India first don't twist ,and if now your using this sentence then why does he claim that Indians thought Egyptians Mesopotamia Persians if we all are one and similar?? Why make the book India in Egypt?? Y'all thought only y'all saw the sun and started worshipping and others just thought it was some fire ball? Think about it how most of these people are claiming all the other civilizations as Indian. Each one feels proud I can understand but claiming others and to say y'all thought us, I mean we don't have brains or something that Indians had to go and teach everyone including Africans lol? It's like to say only Indians used their brains and rest of us are just robots following like sheep.
@@andreamessiasgomes7118 No one is claiming all the history as only originated from India. India was and is the cultural capital and with rich history and west has colonised and destroyed all the evidences but now the DNA evidences shows the Truth about India's Rich Culture. Its obvious that the India was well connected with rich Culture due to its trade roots and connection between many ethinic communities and its geographical significance and his historic significance is often overseen by west. So its obvious that researches , historians ,archaeologist and human genome sequence and tracing departments have published many journals which have proven Indias connection around the world. If you think otherwise obviously you can think so but this is the fact and fact sometimes when it might hurt others . Your belief system says otherwise and we respect it and talking about GOD we have millions and billions of GODS more than our population because we believe in free thinking so anyone can think anything as GOD thats our freedom . Thanks for reading and taking your time. WHatever you think is also right, what this professor thinks and also the human genome tracing shows our richness if you say it its not then yes it is not because we agree to everyones opinion because you own that like how he owns his opinion on this video.
dont tell egyptians are our ancestors.
indra symbol is egyptian
He is saying Indians populated middle east n egypt
@@MsBlueshark these are more of hypotgesis , stories made based on hypothesis and less of facts and again stories weaved around those facts.
@@TheMalllu those hypothesis are backed with proof which you ignore
@@TheMallluCommie spotted