Not only I simply like this piece, I also love how Lyapunov wrote this sheet music in such a way - his way of separating voice parts is very interesting.
Unlike what most people say here, I think this sounds nothing like Chopin. I adore Chopin's nocturnes, and although I love playing them because they are so beautiful, only Lyapunov's nocturne makes me cry. I suppose that's why he only made one. You can't write something more grand and full of passion and longing than this.
Reminds me of Sergei Bortkiewicz, the ultra-romantic Russian piano composer. He also had a great sense of melody and melancholy, lots ot polyrhythms and pieces of sheer poetry.
Listening to this beauty makes me feel like I'm wondering alone at night in my city, feeling depressed but relieved at the same time, looking at the lights far from me from some kind of plant or factory. As I see these lights, I think about the life the should have been but is not
The beginning remembers Chopin's nocturne 27'2. The key signature, the left hand introduction and some melody passages (like the passage around 1:50 from Db to A major which is exactly what Chopin did in his nocturne although he did not change the key signature), despite Lyapunov's unique style completely separate from Chopin, are incredibly in the "Nocturne mood". Beautiful writing!
Stunning, absolutely stunning. And just because it's titled a nocturne and very romantic doesn't mean it has to sound like Chopin. Some of you may have listened to Faure's nocturnes. Some of you may be ready to compose a nocturne or two of your own. Listen with fresh ears. Get the wax out. This work stands on its own and doesn't need your "it sounds like". CVD
but it does- sound a bit like Chopin- yet does that matter: that is for personal judgement; and when does inspiration from another come to undermine real authenticity- this may just be a case in point, the more you listen you wonder, yet the composition is entrancing, so why not accept it for what it is, or why not.
Dear Ralph; If you're going to use the English language, why not go all the way and use capital letters and question marks? I have absolute faith that you can do it! Or would that hamper your authenticity? CVD
Well this is the first name that springs to mind when i try to name #6 on my fave composer list. The first 5 are Liszt Chopin Rachmaninoff Blumenfield and Beethoven so its not surprising people are naming people in my 1-4
This is one of, if not THE most beautiful piece ever composed for piano. Right up there alongside Ballade 1 in g minor. Definitely the most underrated.
Just as Liadov and Tchaikovsky and Rachy were inspired by Chopin, so was Lyapunov. Makes perfect sense. Most everyone loves Chopin and then begins to dream like him. Ask Mr. Liszt! This Nocturne is a masterpiece, with all credit to Mr. Lyapunov. Bravo!
I'm always saddened by the amount of bitchiness and anger that these responses seem to contain. Music should be comforting and healing. It is NOT meant to cause such petty dissent.
Veronica connolly The point is that inspiration can be drawn from others while still preserving individuality in music. I hope you aren’t fanatically on the “Chopin is a copycat of Field” bandwagon.
@@veronicaconnolly4542 well field did invent the nocturne and he was the only composer that composed a nocturne so who was he supposed to be influenced by? That’s like saying Beethoven is copying the person who invented the sonata which is dumb
Es una obra increíble, compleja y con todos los elementos que deja Field y después perfecciona Chopin. El lirismo, la melodía dulce, el caos y el paseo armónico hasta llegar a la plenitud.
Sometimes considering where composers draw their inspiration from can lead to a more meaningful understanding of the message they try to convey in the piece. It’s not for the purposes of bringing down the individuality of this music. The more I read comments, however, the less I think humanity has the capacity to think in this way...
AmaLisanur , no wonder. there were hundreds of good Russian composers. look vid "top 30 Russian composers", I am sure you will find there a lot of composers you have never heard about
What a beautiful performance! What struck me were the fioriture in this piece. They struct me as doing something unique, not only in Chopin but in any other romantic composers. Even in Chopin and Liszt ( most certainly Liszt) there exists a kind of operatic quality to how fioriture is used to vary expression. But here, something modern is getting expressed. I am trying to put my finger on it, but it is slippery like an eel. It is almost like they are attempting to break away from the melody. I am also thinking the are abstracted from the melody. Do I sound crazy? Someone, please tell me if I am making any sense at all.
Even though I don’t like to make comparisons with other composers I have to admit that this nocturne reminded to me the atmosphere of the Scriabin etudes. Beautiful composition!
It's closer to Brahms than Chopin. I really don't see why people say it reminds them of Chopin other than the mood which is totally romantic but so much closer to Brahms. And if you disagree just go listen Brahm's Intermezzo in A major . The melody has a similar kind of movement. Although this has a lot more arpeggios. Overall, great piece and great emotional expression. Which is what music is mostly (!) about. Especially in romanticism. The name itself is pretty self-explanatory . Love it. Hope to perform it soon enough!
I do disagree. This is not at all like Brahms, including the cited Intermezzo. Brahms's piano music is much more concise and much more contrapuntal in texture. To characterize a piece as "romantic" does not provide much insight, and it certainly does not make it sound like or create a meaningful connection to other music (e.g., by Brahms) to which the same label might be affixed. Enjoy this piece on its own merits.
Well it's a Nocturne, so the fact that it sounds like Chopin isn't surprising. I think there's way too many things in this that Chopin would NEVER write to consider it "Chopinistique" though. I'd say the only thing that is Chopin-like is the mood itself, otherwise it has it's own distinct style quite separate from Chopin.
I agree with all of these points, however, I personally believe that it's undeniable that there are definitely some vivid "Deja vu" moments between this and the Chopin Nocturne in D-flat... :)
People are annoyingly short-sighted. Just a simple "arpeggio+bel canto melody" and they call out "OMG CHOPIN!" While not realizing that that particular style of writing was quite famous among Chopin's contemporaries. The harmonic and melodic styles are a far-cry from Chopin.
THERE ARE MANY MUSIC THAT HAVE NOT HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO CONQUER "MARKETS", SINCE THESE THEMSELVES WERE MONOPOLIZED BY THE KNOWLEDGE OF SAME. THE POPULARITY WAS MATCHED WITH THE PERSONALITY, AMEN TO BE EXCELLENT INTERPRETERS AND COMPOSERS THAT NOBODY DOES. BUT IT IS GOOD TO LISTEN TO SOME MUSICIANS NOT SO KNOWN AND SEE THAT THE TALENT IS EXPECTING THE LACK OF MARKETING OF SOME PRIVILEGIATE AND "MAINTAINED" BOTH MECHANICS. I PERSONALLY GO MORE THAN AND I LIKE TO SCISS TO THESE COMPOSITORES THAT THEIR RACES WERE NOT SO REVEALING BUT, THAT DOES NOT REMOVE ITS INSPIRATION AND ITS QUALITY.
I do get the Chopin mood, but I would say its heavily influenced by Rachmaninoff - the left hand ostinato in the start is very very similar to Rachmaninoff's Prelude opus 23 no 4. I also feel like the general emotional build up of the piece is like Lizst's Sonetto del Petrarca 104, although obviously it has it differences - just in the way that it has a main theme that develops and becomes more complex and emotionally charged. I wouldn't really say it's exactly like Chopin, but maybe I'm listening for different things. Great piece though for sure.
Liapunov was nearly 15 years older than Rachmaninoff so could not have been influenced by him. Although Lipunov, like Rachmaninoff and others, studied counterpoint with Taneyev in Moscow, the strongest influences here seem to be the St. Petersburg school, particularly Balakirev.
It's interesting how almost everyone seems to compare this to Chopin. It sounds more like early Scriabin and Liszt. Of course, early Scriabin was also influenced by Chopin, but that's just how music evolved.
You're right. Liszt was a great inspiration to Lyapunov. As a matter of fact, he composed a set of transcendental studies to complete the cycle in all keys that Liszt didn't use in his set. I highly recommend listening to it.
Is there a tutorial that can help with the rhythms in the piu mosso agitato section? (hemiola and phrasing). I searched online, but cannot find anything. Thank you.
Sorry this reply comes so long after your question! What is helping me with that section is realizing that it's all just 2 against 3 like the main / opening theme, except now the right hand is playing all triplets while the left is standard time. (Whereas the first theme has left hand on triplets, right hand standard). Hope that helps!
Sergey Liapounov sort d'une léthargie par la grâce de jeunes pianistes qui y puisent des trésors de musique laissée si longtemps demeurée dans l'ombre comme nombre incroyable de génies laissés pour compte tels d'autres grands compositeurs Russes où l'on découvre des trésors visionnaires harmonie subtile d'une puissance d'évocation qui boulverse le coeur et les sens au sence noble de l'expression post-romantique et qu'il nous appartient envie de découvrir ( encore).la Russie possède en son sein le devoir de nous transmettre par la grâce de géniaux interprètes aux multiformes artistiques de grands chef-d'euvres . Ayont foi en cet avenir si occulté encore de notre côté occidental bien trop timide à l'ouverture de ce peuple si remarquable et trop souvent mis au purgatoire de l'expression humaine pour des motifs que l'ont ne connaît que trop et qui représente une grave erreur .du point de vue Artistique : guettons avec ardeur cet espoir .
Note the term "some". Is this to say Lyapunov was but a copycat of Chopin? Perhaps. Perhaps not. If originality is what you seek, check out Xenakis, Nancarrow, Ligeti, Messiaen et al.
no, cari. questo è scopiazzare Chopin nella maniera più lampante anche nell'utilizzo della melodia e delle "volatine". il tema è un incrocio tra il notturno in re bemolle maggiore e quello in sol minore chopiniani
I can’t really find the beauty in this piece since it sounds so similar to Chopins op.27 no.2 it’s predictable in most parts. I mean it’s calming but to me there’s nothing new in it or special.
No, they are not, he may not be accenting them, but if an "inner melody" is missing it's probably just a made up melody from misinterpreting the music.
Yeah man, I have ears, and all of the inner melodies are very much present. Or are these recordings you're talking about played by people who recognize how terrible this music is, and they intentionally create new "inner voices" to hide this garbage's flaws?
Not only I simply like this piece, I also love how Lyapunov wrote this sheet music in such a way - his way of separating voice parts is very interesting.
Unlike what most people say here, I think this sounds nothing like Chopin. I adore Chopin's nocturnes, and although I love playing them because they are so beautiful, only Lyapunov's nocturne makes me cry. I suppose that's why he only made one. You can't write something more grand and full of passion and longing than this.
No, you're just delusional.
I feel that there is more resemblance to Liszt than Chopin in this piece.
Op.48 No.1 is better.
Reminds me of Sergei Bortkiewicz, the ultra-romantic Russian piano composer. He also had a great sense of melody and melancholy, lots ot polyrhythms and pieces of sheer poetry.
WHY ARE ALL MY FAVOURITE COMPOSERS NAMED SERGEI 😭😭
@@yekware Russian composers trying not to be named Sergei or Nikolai: impossible 😂
Bortkiewicz is to Chopin what Lyapunov is to Liszt
@@central9823Great comparison!
@@tarikeld11 Alexander Scriabin, Alexander Glazunov, Pyotr Tchaikovsky: ...
Listening to this beauty makes me feel like I'm wondering alone at night in my city, feeling depressed but relieved at the same time, looking at the lights far from me from some kind of plant or factory. As I see these lights, I think about the life the should have been but is not
Свет льётся с небес и растекается по душам и сердцам.
The beginning remembers Chopin's nocturne 27'2. The key signature, the left hand introduction and some melody passages (like the passage around 1:50 from Db to A major which is exactly what Chopin did in his nocturne although he did not change the key signature), despite Lyapunov's unique style completely separate from Chopin, are incredibly in the "Nocturne mood". Beautiful writing!
I think so too
Гениальное произведение!!! Вызывает прилив энергии и удовлетворения всем, что есть на свете
Stunning, absolutely stunning. And just because it's titled a nocturne and very romantic doesn't mean it has to sound like Chopin. Some of you may have listened to Faure's nocturnes. Some of you may be ready to compose a nocturne or two of your own. Listen with fresh ears. Get the wax out. This work stands on its own and doesn't need your "it sounds like". CVD
It does sound very unique, doesn't say Chopin to me
but it does- sound a bit like Chopin- yet does that matter: that is for personal judgement; and when does inspiration from another come to undermine real authenticity- this may just be a case in point, the more you listen you wonder, yet the composition is entrancing, so why not accept it for what it is, or why not.
Dear Ralph; If you're going to use the English language, why not go all the way and use capital letters and question marks? I have absolute faith that you can do it! Or would that hamper your authenticity? CVD
I didn't mention a "Ralph." I mentioned Faure. CVD
Well this is the first name that springs to mind when i try to name #6 on my fave composer list. The first 5 are Liszt Chopin Rachmaninoff Blumenfield and Beethoven so its not surprising people are naming people in my 1-4
I've never heard something quite like this. Eerie, romantic, and beautiful.
This nocturne sounds exactly like Lyapunov (big *smile* inserted here).
Aye, finally. XD
This is one of, if not THE most beautiful piece ever composed for piano. Right up there alongside Ballade 1 in g minor. Definitely the most underrated.
🌹
Πολυ αισθαντικο νυχτερινο, υπεροχο 🌺🌹🎹🎵
Simply couldn't listen to it only once. Thanks for uploading!
Just as Liadov and Tchaikovsky and Rachy were inspired by Chopin, so was Lyapunov. Makes perfect sense. Most everyone loves Chopin and then begins to dream like him. Ask Mr. Liszt! This Nocturne is a masterpiece, with all credit to Mr. Lyapunov. Bravo!
I'm always saddened by the amount of bitchiness and anger that these
responses seem to contain. Music should be comforting and healing.
It is NOT meant to cause such petty dissent.
Wow first time I've heard of this composer. Definitely will be looking into him. Love the style
Absolutely wonderful and beautifully played.
Aleksandr abi bak kardeşin ne güzel sanat sepet yapıyor. Keşke kardeşin gibi müziğe yönelseydin. Hayatımızı kararttın lyapunov functionla.
I feel you
Absolutely fantastic piece! ❤️❤️❤️
While it is clear this nocturne was influenced by Chopin's d flat major nocturne, Lyapunov still has his own voice. I really enjoyed this piece
I thought the same thing too! they are both gorgeous pieces. :)
and Chopin's nocturnes were influenced by Field's nocturnes whats the point?
@@veronicaconnolly4542 don't be snarky.
Veronica connolly The point is that inspiration can be drawn from others while still preserving individuality in music. I hope you aren’t fanatically on the “Chopin is a copycat of Field” bandwagon.
@@veronicaconnolly4542 well field did invent the nocturne and he was the only composer that composed a nocturne so who was he supposed to be influenced by? That’s like saying Beethoven is copying the person who invented the sonata which is dumb
Es una obra increíble, compleja y con todos los elementos que deja Field y después perfecciona Chopin. El lirismo, la melodía dulce, el caos y el paseo armónico hasta llegar a la plenitud.
Why the need to always compare? Why not just savor this composer’s gem?
Im thinking the same thing
Sometimes considering where composers draw their inspiration from can lead to a more meaningful understanding of the message they try to convey in the piece. It’s not for the purposes of bringing down the individuality of this music. The more I read comments, however, the less I think humanity has the capacity to think in this way...
Thank you man, I didn't know this russian artist, this is very good piano music
The part between 2:00 and 3:00 is magical
I'm glad you liked it, friend. :)
AmaLisanur
, no wonder. there were hundreds of good Russian composers. look vid "top 30 Russian composers", I am sure you will find there a lot of composers you have never heard about
Utterly astonishing and brilliant
What a beautiful performance!
What struck me were the fioriture in this piece. They struct me as doing something unique, not only in Chopin but in any other romantic composers. Even in Chopin and Liszt ( most certainly Liszt) there exists a kind of operatic quality to how fioriture is used to vary expression. But here, something modern is getting expressed.
I am trying to put my finger on it, but it is slippery like an eel. It is almost like they are attempting to break away from the melody. I am also thinking the are abstracted from the melody.
Do I sound crazy? Someone, please tell me if I am making any sense at all.
Even though I don’t like to make comparisons with other composers I have to admit that this nocturne reminded to me the atmosphere of the Scriabin etudes. Beautiful composition!
Doesn’t remind you of the op.27 no.2?
@@johnsonzelop4259 at the beginning, yes, it reminds me of the nocturne op.27 n.2 by Chopin, but the middle section reminds me of Scriabin
Seems like a mixture between Chopin and Scriabin. Love it!😍
Chopin really ?
It's closer to Brahms than Chopin. I really don't see why people say it reminds them of Chopin other than the mood which is totally romantic but so much closer to Brahms. And if you disagree just go listen Brahm's Intermezzo in A major . The melody has a similar kind of movement. Although this has a lot more arpeggios. Overall, great piece and great emotional expression. Which is what music is mostly (!) about. Especially in romanticism. The name itself is pretty self-explanatory . Love it. Hope to perform it soon enough!
I do disagree. This is not at all like Brahms, including the cited Intermezzo. Brahms's piano music is much more concise and much more contrapuntal in texture. To characterize a piece as "romantic" does not provide much insight, and it certainly does not make it sound like or create a meaningful connection to other music (e.g., by Brahms) to which the same label might be affixed. Enjoy this piece on its own merits.
Rather than comparing this to Chopin, I prefer to do so with Blumenfeld. A more direct comparison, if I may so.
I love this nocturne even over Chopin's and Field's
wonderful!... dreamy ..many thanks for uploading ...
You're welcome. :)
Omg this is beautiful and so soothing! Gonna be in my bucket list
Like falling in love!!
Well it's a Nocturne, so the fact that it sounds like Chopin isn't surprising. I think there's way too many things in this that Chopin would NEVER write to consider it "Chopinistique" though. I'd say the only thing that is Chopin-like is the mood itself, otherwise it has it's own distinct style quite separate from Chopin.
Now that's a good criticism. :)
I agree, it has a different mood than Chopin's Nocturnes.
I think that's maybe 19th-like? :)
I agree with all of these points, however, I personally believe that it's undeniable that there are definitely some vivid "Deja vu" moments between this and the Chopin Nocturne in D-flat... :)
People are annoyingly short-sighted. Just a simple "arpeggio+bel canto melody" and they call out "OMG CHOPIN!" While not realizing that that particular style of writing was quite famous among Chopin's contemporaries. The harmonic and melodic styles are a far-cry from Chopin.
Un bellissimo notturno
René Pariente: Trés beau morceau que je ne connaissais pas
How beautiful this is. Like a caress.
THERE ARE MANY MUSIC THAT HAVE NOT HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO CONQUER "MARKETS", SINCE THESE THEMSELVES WERE MONOPOLIZED BY THE KNOWLEDGE OF SAME. THE POPULARITY WAS MATCHED WITH THE PERSONALITY, AMEN TO BE EXCELLENT INTERPRETERS AND COMPOSERS THAT NOBODY DOES. BUT IT IS GOOD TO LISTEN TO SOME MUSICIANS NOT SO KNOWN AND SEE THAT THE TALENT IS EXPECTING THE LACK OF MARKETING OF SOME PRIVILEGIATE AND "MAINTAINED" BOTH MECHANICS. I PERSONALLY GO MORE THAN AND I LIKE TO SCISS TO THESE COMPOSITORES THAT THEIR RACES WERE NOT SO REVEALING BUT, THAT DOES NOT REMOVE ITS INSPIRATION AND ITS QUALITY.
the main theme (A) sound like chopin, it could be his
the B however resembles a bit of rach+chopin :D
and the final product is...lyapunov
very beautiful ,first time i heard it
Bravo brilliance music super
I think he added a note at 6:17 ...
Wonderful piece, texture and sound remind me a little bit of Scriabin. Left hand very difficult.
Very Awesome Thank You 🤗
I do get the Chopin mood, but I would say its heavily influenced by Rachmaninoff - the left hand ostinato in the start is very very similar to Rachmaninoff's Prelude opus 23 no 4. I also feel like the general emotional build up of the piece is like Lizst's Sonetto del Petrarca 104, although obviously it has it differences - just in the way that it has a main theme that develops and becomes more complex and emotionally charged. I wouldn't really say it's exactly like Chopin, but maybe I'm listening for different things. Great piece though for sure.
Rachmaninoff was only 20 years old when this Lyapunov Nocturne was published in 1893. The Rachmaninoff Preludes op.23 were written in 1901 - 1903.
Liapunov was nearly 15 years older than Rachmaninoff so could not have been influenced by him. Although Lipunov, like Rachmaninoff and others, studied counterpoint with Taneyev in Moscow, the strongest influences here seem to be the St. Petersburg school, particularly Balakirev.
@3:31 I totally had a false (Sonetto 104 del Petrarca) moment during that measure. ♪♪♫
It's interesting how almost everyone seems to compare this to Chopin. It sounds more like early Scriabin and Liszt. Of course, early Scriabin was also influenced by Chopin, but that's just how music evolved.
Sounds just like Rammstein. Stunning!
Super difficult 🤯
This reminds me, weirdly, of the fourth Ballade. Does anyone else get the same feeling?
I agree, the tone is similar.
この曲をショパンと比べると、
如何にショパンが天才かよくわかる...
2:44 that A# 💪🏼
Very Good!
I was trying to find the Lyapunov function… i think im lost now.
very nice nocturne absoluty different from Chopins nocturnes with a thing very typical and impressive
wonderful！
Beautiful!
beautiful
Lyapunov, Nocturne in D flat major 1995
1995? :/
Lyapunov is on par with Liszt, no one can convince me otherwise.
Agreed!
i also actually agree XD
You're right. Liszt was a great inspiration to Lyapunov. As a matter of fact, he composed a set of transcendental studies to complete the cycle in all keys that Liszt didn't use in his set. I highly recommend listening to it.
Yeah and liszt is terrible. Sounds about right.
y3vtfbdgrnewouiyvbriunw why@@Whatismusic123
Great!
Splendido.
Все певчие исполняли с удовольствием, а не с постными лицами!
Is there a tutorial that can help with the rhythms in the piu mosso agitato section? (hemiola and phrasing). I searched online, but cannot find anything. Thank you.
Sorry this reply comes so long after your question! What is helping me with that section is realizing that it's all just 2 against 3 like the main / opening theme, except now the right hand is playing all triplets while the left is standard time. (Whereas the first theme has left hand on triplets, right hand standard). Hope that helps!
This piece reeks of Chopin. However, that doesn't mean its bad, but quite the opposite of it.
Překrásna skladba 👍
Des-Dur? ( 5 b )
First time listener here. This sounds way better than Liszt and Chopin!
This reminds me of Chopin at times.
DAT arpeggio
Bellissimo
One Tree Hill
Sergey Liapounov sort d'une léthargie par la grâce de jeunes pianistes qui y puisent des trésors de musique laissée si longtemps demeurée dans l'ombre comme nombre incroyable de génies laissés pour compte tels d'autres grands compositeurs Russes où l'on découvre des trésors visionnaires harmonie subtile d'une puissance d'évocation qui boulverse le coeur et les sens au sence noble de l'expression post-romantique et qu'il nous appartient envie de découvrir ( encore).la Russie possède en son sein le devoir de nous transmettre par la grâce de géniaux interprètes aux multiformes artistiques de grands chef-d'euvres . Ayont foi en cet avenir si occulté encore de notre côté occidental bien trop timide à l'ouverture de ce peuple si remarquable et trop souvent mis au purgatoire de l'expression humaine pour des motifs que l'ont ne connaît que trop et qui représente une grave erreur .du point de vue Artistique : guettons avec ardeur cet espoir .
I wonder why a lot of nocturnes are in B Flat Major...
But Sir, this one is in D-Flat !
Nice
Love dis music! Even though it resembles chopin, it still has some originality in it.
Note the term "some". Is this to say Lyapunov was but a copycat of Chopin? Perhaps. Perhaps not. If originality is what you seek, check out Xenakis, Nancarrow, Ligeti, Messiaen et al.
Very pretty.
no, cari. questo è scopiazzare Chopin nella maniera più lampante anche nell'utilizzo della melodia e delle "volatine". il tema è un incrocio tra il notturno in re bemolle maggiore e quello in sol minore chopiniani
The composer is Russian.
sounds somewhat like liszt at some parts
Dear Chopin influenced so many people, didn't he?
Sounds like music of the east to me.
Chopin and Liszt style had been mixed.
That's better than Chopin, isn't it ?
Sounds like Michael Jackson!
good comment
You should say the other way.
I'm not sure if I like it ha...
Who is here because of his brother?
I can’t really find the beauty in this piece since it sounds so similar to Chopins op.27 no.2 it’s predictable in most parts. I mean it’s calming but to me there’s nothing new in it or special.
Недо Шопен)
A number of inner melodies missing.
No, they are not, he may not be accenting them, but if an "inner melody" is missing it's probably just a made up melody from misinterpreting the music.
@@Whatismusic123 The pianist MUST accent them! If they don't SING OUT then they're NOT melodies. It is not enough to simply "play the notes".
@@r.i.p.volodya bro you have absolutely 0 clue how countrrpoint works
@@Whatismusic123 BULL! Listen to a Horowitz or Friedman and see how countermelodies are SUPPOSED to be projected.
Yeah man, I have ears, and all of the inner melodies are very much present. Or are these recordings you're talking about played by people who recognize how terrible this music is, and they intentionally create new "inner voices" to hide this garbage's flaws?
Rachmanichopin
Chopaninoff
Unlike chopin, this piece features terrible form.
А что с аргументами? Как там поживают?
The piano is out of tune.
?
No
Beautiful