I sell firearms at a gunshop part time for fun. Today I was speaking with a customer who is a lawyer about registration. He told me that if you choose to register your weapon. You agree to random warrantless surch of your house and or property. I've had enough. I'm moving out of state next year, and I'm taking my family, guns, and company with with me. The California dream has turned into a nightmare.
I would never live in California. It's way too expensive for property, and the gun laws totally suck. I will keep my blizzards and cold weather any day.
The problem is , they starting to move to red states , not only thru Illegal immigration but Texas with a great economy attracts plenty of Of them there. In no time they ll want a California there too.
sadly i live there and the laws are so useless the fin grip if anything adds to your steadiness and honestly boosts your accuracy a pin in the stock does nothing only thing im really annoyed at is the 10 round mags only if i could still rip my 50 rd drums.
Most of the world record holders for highest confirmed kills in war using rifles were using "featureless" rifles with just iron sights and wooden stocks. The ergonomics of a rifle has nothing to do with its deadliness; deadliness is determined by the shooter's motives and skill.
I bought my first handgun from an out of state dealer at a gun show in Mobile, AL during Clinton's "Assault" weapons ban. I had to pick the 9mm up from a local FFL and we were discussing the idiocy of the ban and he, a grizzled Vietnam vet, looked me in the eye and said he could wrack up a higher body count with an off-the shelf .22 semi-auto than most AR-15 owners could with their weapons. I had no trouble believing him. That's why I will never accept red flags or banning weapons by type. It's nothing more than a foot in the door. They fully understand that the vast majority of homicides are by semi-auto handguns and THOSE will be next on the list. It might just be time for citizens to begin creating their own lists. They have forgotten that they serve US, not the other way around. I respect law enforcement officers but any who use the force of an unconstitutional edict are no longer law enforcement. They have chosen the badge and the income over the rights of their fellow Americans.
We the People need to stand together with one voice and tell these tyrant wannabees that we have these weapons and we are not giving them up. Hiding only delays the inevitable.
I'm a non-gun-owning Californian and found your video enjoyable and informative. And while I don't own any firearms, I am a very staunch supporter of them and the 2nd Amendment!
This is the reason why you do not allow illegal immigrants to pour in to your state. They ruined California. I left over fifteen years ago because I was so tired of it. I never vote for Democrats and I try to support candidates that support the United States Constitution.
Im glad to live in Florida, grew up in Cuba in Communism for 44 years and I don't have the same reaction when I see places like California, It creates a dangerous precedent for the rest of the country and there is no other word to describe this government officials , Tyrants. Thank you for been there showing the truth.
That’s actually a really good idea. If only the companies cared. Anti gun laws actually work in the favor of companies though, since they can make even more and charge more from hysteria :/.
@@dustinmikesell7908 same here. I went in on a bulk buy of green tips with a couple buddies in January. There is no substitute for good timing.... that's why I hope he got it 5 months ago, lol.
typeviic1 In the context of the constitution, “well regulated” most likely meant “functioning” or “organized”. Not literally regulated by the government. The founding fathers were very against that.
@@typeviic1 NOT TO MENTION the fact that it was talking about a "well regulated militia" not talking about guns in that sentence. basically all that was saying is our militia needs to be strong.
If a law restricts the rights of the people, you not only have a right NOT to follow it, but you have a moral obligation to stand and fight against it.
We are seriously considering moving out of California. We were born and raised here but now feel overly oppressed. The latest bunch of anti-gun laws are extremely troubling.
I know what you mean. Every state we have considered is just a couple years behind on the anti-gun legislation and the weather stinks. Even Texas seems to be heading down the wrong path. If only we could actually get organized enough to vote out the bad ones from office! And demand change in the media. The collusion is out of control.
Moving out of CA gives up political power to liberals without a fight. This is WHY CA is liberal. People ran away than fighting. You think it will stop? It will spread until you stop it. The true patriot moves into CA, educates people, helps people be gun owners and reverses the liberal agenda. Same goes to all other "enemy" states, New York, Hawaii, etc.
+Dave Smith I agree in theory Dave. but in practice, truthfully, you will not ever affect the liberal states. it's best to leave them to destroy their states economy, blow up housing costs, lower wages and raise the cost of living, until they are NO longer able to survive. your essentially saying, "this two year old is perfectly capable of reasoned logic." besides that, you will never have the influence Hollywood does. just give it up friend, or exact a tactical retreat to a NC, we would love to have another open carry resident. think about it. you're like Hitler in stalingrad, destined to lose, but how many soldiers to you leave behind? good luck brother.
completely valid points all. I remember that in "Red Dawn"' one of the first things the invading force did was to look in local registration data bases for registered owners of firearms so they could confiscate them and knew where the source of possible resistance would be.
@@hookeaires6637 I never stated it was. I think perhaps you missed the point. government wants gun-owners to register their guns so they know where to come to get them and where possible resistance may come from. there is no justifiable reason otherwise to require registration of guns.
Leftist legislators in California love to pass laws that disarm the public. Because if they can get away with it they will. They need a monopoly of force so they can marginalize people with impunity.
Just bought a 45 cal 1911 the other day. Took about 30 mins to walk out the door tucked in my waist fully concealed with out a CCWP just filled out the background form. Regards, Arizona
@Dennis well the 2nd amendment was written in 1790 and I am talking about how when they wrote the 2nd amendment guns took like what 5 minutes to reload and the first automatic gun kind of like what we have to day wasnt made until the early 1900s
Any law enforcement watching this video. The citizens, including your family, loved ones and friends, need your help against this tyranny. DON'T ENFORCE THESE STATUTES! Stand up with your fellow LEOs and uphold the constitution!
8triagrammer LEO won't help, they haven't helped for a long time. they took there oath to uphold the rights of the people and it's constitution and they failed. I have seen LEO stand with the people only long enough till they get there 'LEO exempt' then turn there back on us and walk away. When the day comes for them to repay there betrayal I hope it's a heavy debt.
Stephen Esperson Sorry, but that's not the case. LEOs are just as brainwashed as the masses. It's not like they have secret meetings with LEOs where they explain the truth about everything, and then induct them in to some kind of Skull & Bones-like club. The majority of them just need to be educated. For example, the right to travel without license or registration is well documented and yet most LEOs know nothing about it, they just assume everyone needs a DL to drive. If you want to villainize them (as I once did), that's your choice, but I propose that it would be much more efficient to get them on our side, which is what they want. Remember that their family, friends and loved ones are mostly all non LEO citizens...
That is really funny Stephen because lots of officers have lost their jobs defending what they thought was right but somehow I don't remember you supporting them during those times. Don't pull the edgy teenage "when the revolution comes, then I'll..." Need to cut those corners off your "tuit". LEO do not secure your rights, the people secure their own rights. That is the whole damn point of the 2A. Noncompliance with an illegal law is the only way to fight gu control. Don't be stupid and open about it, but be clever and secretative. I mean, this is common sense people. If you find yourself blaming officers, military, corporations, banks or whatever for the problems in the government, chances are you fell for the distractions of the liberal's propaganda .
Dave Smith Well said. Not so sure about the liberal vs. conservative thing though - that's just another layer of the divide and conquer strategy that they employ. The real culprits are much higher up, the CFR, IMF, UN, etc. They own the District of Columbia corporation which owns the USA corp (which replaced the original republic), and the USA corp owns the state which are like subsidiary corps.
Dont worry L.E are the the ones who enforce these bondage laws, when the time comes a lot wont put their life on the line for these zionist overloards who are running the good hard working kind righteous people of the earth, in this hidden bondage and mind control......in the end the THE TRUTH LIKE THE LIGHT SHINES ABOVE ALL !
No. The constitution is not law. The supreme court interpets the constitution into law. And for that you should be thankful- the constitution simply says you can "bear arms" in an "organized militia". The supreme court ruled that in modern times that you as an individual can own a firearm. Remember that. They could rule the other way if people abuse the right.
Kirk Mullins it’s true. The constitution is not law per se. it is a guarantee of our God given rights. It guarantees that no government agency can infringe on those rights. But democrats don’t give a flying flip about our rights. Our rights only get in the way of their agenda, which is total control of the population.
I guarantee you that the only reason there is an option is because they couldn't get it passed without. The antis want disarmament. That is their end goal, make no mistake. The only reason the 1994 Assault Weapon Ban expired is because Feinstein couldn't get a permanent ban passed. And the people of California keep electing that awful woman.......
Feinstein is a liberal fool, if she is jewish I can't believe she would be against the 2nd amendment in any form. does she even believe in the holocaust ? not!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
peter horr She is no fool; she knows exactly what she is doing. She is on a quest for personal gain. Power hungry tyrants like her don't care. The elite will always have whatever it is they are depriving the rest of us.
Didn't Mark Twain say that, " the elite will always have what they won't let you have...? I think so. Feinstein still sucks and will always get what she sais we can't have... a real _unt. the c deleted
since trump won, we 2nd amendment advocates can breathe a short sigh of relief.. but not for long. join the nra and the judicial watch to keep up the fight to keep the constitution and bill of rights.
So when you buy a gun from a gun shop and they do a background check, you pass and they give it to you. That doesn't mean it's registered does it? I've never really heard of this
@@maruzencentral No absolutely not, in fact that is illegal. The only record of that transaction is kept by the FFL who sold it to you, the only caviot to that is if they go out of biz they must give those 4473 forms ro the BATF, but they are not allowed to put those in a database, they can only make microfiche, hut those are federal laws not Mo. But if you buy a gun from an individual there is no 4473. A background check is not a registration, and that does not even address the made at home guns which have no serial numbers, not only that but the vest thing here is it is constitutional carry which means I don't need a CCW to carry a loaded concealed weapon on my person, in my car, at my campsite, when I shop or eat etc
Here's the only reason you need. Your forefathers left you the right to own them to preserve your freedom. Registering them, you know is to ultimately confiscate them. You were charged with defending that freedom even if it takes your life.
Never fear foreigners WE ARE the largest armed force in history and WE are waiting with OUR guns in the truck, tanks full and course to Washington D.C. Plotted!
I will not give up my rights. I spent 14 years upholding my constitution, defending the said constitution. "O" and I am legally responsible to do so!!!!!!
To expand just a bit on Reason No. 3: if you register your rifle, you are accountable for it and must be able to produce it upon demand, unless and until you transfer that registration in a manner that is acceptable to the state. And the state doesn't have to make that easy for you to do. If you don't register it, the state only knows that you held an AR-15 (or an object that looks like one) in your hands at some point. If they look at the 4473 where you purchased it, they know that you had it. But they don't know if you still have it, and therefore cannot demand that you produce it. That is a much more important point than it may sound.
Michael Arnold, no filling out a 4473 (the form you fill out upon purchasing a firearm) does NOT place the gun in a registry. That involves specifically either registering your firearms serial number to your name either through the manufacturer or your local police department. In theory people do this in the event of their gun being stolen, it can be traced back to them if it is found.
Possum Living,to expand on that,any long gun after 2014 already has the sn on the dros record,so what other list is it going to be on now?they already know
Also to remember, FFL have to record what guns & ammo you have bought and may share with state and federal government what you own incase the registration system fails to confiscate your guns (Form 4473)
Everyone with a gun in California just needs to perform citizens arrests on CHP, the local police precincts that enforce these laws, the elected officials of each city, and the CA DoJ and force new elections. Bring firearms for protection, ROE is to not fire until fired upon. The people of this nation are the militia that was made to stand against a tyrannical gov't, it is time for those that reside in CA, NY, NH, etc to take back their states.
Boy oh boy! Eventhough I don't feel like taking the time to build any ARs from scratch, I'm thinking maybe I should get some 80% lowers and the jig/end mills just to have, while they're still legal... surprisingly!
I'm never registering _any_ firearms, and I _will_ own as many as I want, where I want, and how I want. Problem? See; Second Amendment in the Constitution of this United States of America.
The second amendment is just words on paper, they’re right about that. Where they’re wrong is that said words on paper give us rights. Wrong, they merely spell out what rights we already have. Rights don’t come from government. The amendment is only a declaration of an existing right. 2nd amendment or not, our rights are permanent and inalienable, they come from our creator and from our nature, not from politicians, not from laws, not from words on paper.
Reasons based on Australian experience: #1 When they introduce bans, government knows that you have it and will come hunting for it. Registration in the majority of Australian States was a prerequisite for the semi-automatic rifle ban introduced in 1996. Without registration, this ban would have been a complete failure and would have eventually been revoked. #2 Registries are virtual shopping lists for bent Police and Criminals. The introduction of registration in NSW as part of the 1996 laws saw a number of firearm collections stolen, this was not something that had not previously occurred.
Not exactly. The records are available to LE at your local FFL, but they have to go there requesting information on the particular weapon by serial number. When your FFL goes out of business, they have to ship their records for storage at BATF. Again, nothing from your purchase from a FFL is in a database.
@@lances4803 So neither a gunshop or big box store keep those particular records together (serial # and name associated with it?) What about the 4473? I've always been told the atf can just go into those establishments and take those records therefore knowing everything you have. Reason why they changed the form to have your info on the first page now. 'm genuinely asking.
@@InAltum. All active FFLs keep the 4473s in their records for the duration they are in business (or at least 20 years). Of course that form contains everything about the sale, but they are the property of the FFL until sent to ATF. ATF has two functions, compliance inspections and LE. Compliance can do one warrantless inspection a year, and generally LE is not involved. They can take records with them if they are voluminous, but not usually, and always with consent of the FFL. (Gets them out of the shop quicker.)
100% agree. I went a slightly different route, mine is a fixed magazine with the evil features, so it’s not an assault rifle. Coming soon to CA and a bunch of other states, AW bans will be unconstitutional along with the gun roster of what is an OK gun to purchase in CA.
in terms of NFA weapons, Virginia is about 10 places above Texas. Yes i'm saying that with NFA weapons, we're more heavily armed. However guns overall, those numbers are impossible to pin down due to lack of a registry. I'm glad those numbers can't be pinned down.
That's a non issue, They KNOW criminals won't comply, what they want is for YOU to be a criminal so they can lock up up with all the other "undesirable" people in their life.
seriously. All these laws do is opress the citizens of this country, they are the only ones who obey these digesting laws. I would never move to commifornia.
This video is... 😊 I love watching it from time to time, to remind myself that there are still decent, sane people in California. And they deserve our support. Be safe.
Isn't the petition just another list that gun owners voluntarily signed and submitted? There is no law (I don't believe) that says the government can't just knock on every gun owner's door based on one or a combination of firearms related lists such as, a non-specific transaction record list, a background check list, the registered "assault weapons" list, pro-gun petitions, tweets, forums posts, credit card purchases, Google searches, Letter or emails to your local politician or even, RUclips Comments. They have the means and will use their power. Every restriction or new law also comes with a nice new fee or tax. I believe they will add a ridiculous "Gun & Ammo Safety" tax next. In California, we already have little choice available to us because of the Approved Guns List but the economy needs still needs our contributions so expect a Special Tax first. They will empty our wallets before they take away our guns. But of course I could be wrong. I wish I could move and take our weather
Believe it or not, as someone who has done investigative work, those people who are charged with using registration databases (I used one of these in an entirely different area, and industry) do try to not waste time, with "FALSE POSITIVE" hits on their lists. A list of signatories to a petition will include enough false positives (non-gun owners), that it would not be nearly as good as this registration database they are seeking to build. What investigators normally do is develop a planning and implementation regime which uses the lists to build "red flag" lists (special filtered out lists where there appears to be a FULL JOIN of say, lists of FELONS, and lists of Ammo purchasers, or Lists of Assault Weapon registrants). This would be a group that could be investigated. It would be far smaller than the list of all registrants in either of the two lists. It's still a valid goal for someone who prizes 2nd A, to simply want to do what it takes to stay out of lists generally. Besides, the main occupation for many of these government folk will be building and testing the database registry. If history is any indication, this may well have design and development problems galore, as they build it. My understanding also, is that the existing registry (mostly manual, probably with some additional IT resources) used in cities like Los Angeles, CA allows police to scour for Felons who appear to be purchasing ammunition from gun stores. This is an example of the kind of "targeted" investigative efforts I mention above, that will likely occur more NEAR TERM from these actions. Of course this is guessing. All that being said, the laws appear crafted to so narrowly define particular platforms, that these fairly innocuous changes (e.g. a rifle with no flash hider, and with say, a Thordsen Customs buttstock; which is a fixed stock, which takes the spot of the pistol grip, removing two of the elements of the definition) that it seems the path of least resistance, and least registration, or database inclusion is via "featureless". I have seen people on video at a range in Louisiana shooting the featureless. These persons appear to have reasonable amount of experience, and they claim on the video that the set up, while not quite as fine as the normal one, is not obnoxious, uncomfortable or difficult to manage.
Right. Like I was saying, I had every single stockbroker in the U.S., their entire academic and judicial record, their date of submission of fingerprinting, essentially EVERYTHING about the more than 500,000 (back then) brokers. This system was called the Central Registration Depository (CRD). This was very useful, but we did not have direct access to develop SQL queries against the database. That sort of thing was done in the regulator's IT shop. It was possible to obtain rosters for any brokerage firm we, as examiners were about to visit to conduct examinations. For particularly suspect ones, I'd get the roster in advance, and simply review the CRD info for everyone. This did not take that long, but it was essentially an individual mainframe query of each person by CRD number. Now, it's possible that today, there is some better front end query tool for FINRA examiners to obtain bulk data on each RR at a brokerage firm. Merely having the list, or knowing a data stockpile exists is not the same as being able to develop a query against the list, or compare one database system to another. That requires software development. I do that now, and can attest that it's not trivial. What we believe MAY be happening, can certainly happen, but, also it's somewhat of a software development problem to actually have government doing it. Once some dictator comes to power, like an Erdogan is in Turkey (I see in the news, he is eliminating his political opposition), then those developer resources are quickly deployed to create lists, using every tool possible.
Oh boy, then those founding fathers were idiots for putting their names on the declaration of Independence... If you can't even sign and vote, you mind as well just eat your gun. You are a waste of space. And don't give me the bull about fighting during the "revolution". If you can't fight today, then you will never fight for the future.
I haven't heard anyone talk about in CA how law enforcement personnel are exempt from the CA gun roster, they can easily buy and register off roster handguns. Also, law enforcement are exempt from the over 10 round magazine capacity ban. I totally understand that law enforcement will have access to certain firearms and magazines that civilians may not for purposes of performing their duties, however, how does that extend also to their personal weapons that they own outside of work? That whole concept that "Well I can have it but you can't" is a big problem for me.
The main reason i only possess semi-auto weapons and not go for the full-auto tag, is to keep ATF out of my biz! Full-auto is over-rated and not necessary in the civilian world. When i was in the U.S.Army, we rarely went full-auto in order to save ammo and have better accuracy.
Hell's teeth guys, your gun laws are almost worse than ours in NZ..... Does it not occur to anyone that the places with least crime involving firearms in your country are those with the FEWEST gun laws? Oh by the way, firearms crime is at an all time high in Australia, as are 'mass shootings' (involving three or more victims) in spite of what many may want you to believe....
Kathryn Truscott Yes, it that thought does occur to those of us with common sense, something politicans and liberals don't seem to have. They think all they have to do is pass a law against something and poof, it stops happening.
Some of us liberals like the guns. Not very many of us, I have to admit. I doubt any of us were Clinton fans. Uck on both those candidates though. I just think the ladies should be able to get abortions and similar monstrous things.
You forgot to mention that we (New Zealanders) did have to hand our rifles in back in the early 90's and our crime rate for home intrusion crimes such as rape, murder etc became the worse in a Western Civilization.......Then the Government let us have our guns back annnnnd also allowed us to have AR15's. And AK47's and more and guess what.......Yup......Crime has dropped to one of the lowest in a Western Civilization.
There is absolutely not one thing that could compel me to live in California. Virtually everything that is wrong in American society has a representation in this state. Unless a state has not only acceptable gun laws ( NRA acceptability, shall issue concealed carry, take possession of firearms purchased immediately at the time of purchase with a CCW, etc ) then there would be absolutely no likelihood of me ever living there. The same would be true in most northeastern states from DC to New Hampshire. Not interested in living in ANY Democratically controlled state nor city either.
way to go matt. I did the same thing in the early 1990s. when cal. started going commie, I left too. cali was great in the 80s no problem for any guns. then came Stockton and everything changed. so I moved to Arizona too... now I live in florida which is very gun friendly also. in the current issue of guns and ammo there is a 50 state ranking of best to worst for guns. Arizona is #1 gun friendliest and DC NY and cali are the 50th....worst for gun owners. not surprising.
i thought oregon was as bad as cali? full of green liberal tree huggers and bernie millenials. i used to live in roseburg about 30 years ago and it was like that then???
what wrong with loving trees? Teddy Roosevelt said the greatest conservationist should be hunters, I love to hunt and I can see the wildlife struggling because society is encroaching on pristine lands.
I will never register ANY of my firearms! A few years ago Connecticut, after Sandy Hook, passed a law requiring owners of semi-autos to register them with the state! I saw pictures of CN gun owners standing in line to comply! I wanted to puke! No one of those gun owners can be depended upon stand up for their rights. I would rather become an "outlaw" than a compliant subject!
Registering a semi automatic rifle with 'evil features' (see CA assault rifle features) as a R.A.W. is different from registering a compliant semi auto rifle. One huge issue is that when you buy one, it's registered before you can ever take it home . But it's not registered as an Assault Weapon . I appreciate the video and sharing your viewpoint. I just felt like that needed some clarification. Although this video is 6 yrs old, so maybe everyone understands by now, anyhow.
Here in Queensland Australia we are required to register all firearms, including paintball guns and gel blasters. We are subjected to regular firearms checks and safe storage compliance checks.
@@shadetreelife3670 you can have them delivered to your door in CA, but if you want to machine it, you're supposed to contact the CA DOJ(Department of Justice) and get it serialized beforehand.
I have never worried about gun control, I can hit what I aim at! However, the government's attempt at controlling the citizens does worry me; registration is merely step one of confiscation!
They have been steadily stepping up the control measures,.and would like to get more control. Tennessee, Oklahoma, Nevada, and many other states , especially ones on main interstate thoroughfares, now employ whats called viper teams. They stop you and search and seize what ever they find ,..They can even swipe you C. Card info and they can seize that too,... the future of this country worries me too,.. we must stay vigilant and cover our neighbors 6 ,..
You should worry! First they go after "assault rifles" then they go after "assault shotguns" then "sniper weapons" And they would consider a pump action shotgun and a bolt action rifle as war weapons. Do not allow ANYONE to lose their rights.
Ajacklee4 - Sorry you missed the inference in my comments. I was pointing out the difference between gun control and citizen control. I don't believe taking away the citizen's rights is as much gun control as citizen's rights control. And yes I agree that we should be extremely vigilant on gun rights' losses because once lost, I doubt they'll be restored without much more legal fighting to restore rights which shouldn't have been taken away in the first place.
All my guns were stolen just last week ! I just haven't had time to report it ! Maybe I'll get lucky next week and find them when the crook returns them because of his guilty conscience !
U.S. Supreme Court ruled over 10 years ago that there is no legal term 'assault rifle' (an automatic military rifle used in war) for a semi automatic civilian rifle. That, that is an action. So if one gets in trouble in Federal Court for a fire arm, the prosecuting Attorney slips up and calls it an 'assault rifle' one can legally use that term against them and void the charges. A good attorney knows this, and how to do this. Mine is officially a Defense Procurement Manufacturing Service by legal name. But of course, laws are not laws in the United States. So the Plutocracy can do as they please and make it up as they go.
As soon as you buy a lower the ATF gets the serial number, so they now you have a rifle. You change anything on the rifle (butstock) it then becomes other /another type of weapon.
The most important thing to take from this Vid is ... you'll be agreeing with the State, that ur AR 15 is Indeed an assault rifle...now they are in complete control ! Do not register ANY of your firearms !! Not ever !! Great vids Sir...keep them up.
I seem to be missing something here. I'm under the impression when you buy a firearm in California, the FFL seller is required to complete and submit the registration paper work as part of the sale. If this is true, how do you avoid registration ?
Tim Campbell the paper work when you buy a gun is not a registration. But if you gun shows up at a crime scene the serial numbers and manufacturer can say which wholesaler got that firearm then they can point to the retailer then to you. But some states want to lord over its people. There is no official federal registration but ...........
Yes but you can buy an 80% lower kit online no reg no and the buy a block lower online as well, that just needs trigger slot milled out , safety couple other places with jig Saw,. Then it's good to go
Video tip: Face away from the sun. Purchase a large white screen bounce screen. You can get them at Samy's in L.A. They lighten up your face with a reflective screen.
I sell firearms at a gunshop part time for fun. Today I was speaking with a customer who is a lawyer about registration. He told me that if you choose to register your weapon. You agree to random warrantless surch of your house and or property. I've had enough. I'm moving out of state next year, and I'm taking my family, guns, and company with with me. The California dream has turned into a nightmare.
Stanley Potter that’s not true
Stanley Potter “the California dream has turned into a nightmare”... well it seems like you’ve awakened from it.
@@doucebigg3815 how so?
LOREN Reece the only way they can do a warrantless search is if you let them into your house.. just don’t let them in or answer the door
come to WV sir bring your family u will have no trouble with gun control.
I would never live in California. It's way too expensive for property, and the gun laws totally suck. I will keep my blizzards and cold weather any day.
The problem is , they starting to move to red states , not only thru
Illegal immigration but Texas with a great economy attracts plenty of
Of them there. In no time they ll want a California there too.
Michael tell me , enlighten me
must be in Michigan, up there with Ted Nugent.
....shall not be infringed. THE END!
Hes in Texas.
Should be called
"Five reasons not to live in California"
You beat me to this comment!
LOL, It wouldn't be just 5 reasons. The reasons to not live in Cali would go on for some time.
Right, when is that earthquake that's gonna send cali in the ocean gonna happen?
As soon as they finish scribing the break line.
sadly i live there and the laws are so useless the fin grip if anything adds to your steadiness and honestly boosts your accuracy a pin in the stock does nothing only thing im really annoyed at is the 10 round mags only if i could still rip my 50 rd drums.
Most of the world record holders for highest confirmed kills in war using rifles were using "featureless" rifles with just iron sights and wooden stocks.
The ergonomics of a rifle has nothing to do with its deadliness; deadliness is determined by the shooter's motives and skill.
Amen! I would rather they take my AK then my 1908 vintage Swedish Mauser or
my 1930 vintage Persian Mauser. With those old guns, I only need one shot.
I bought my first handgun from an out of state dealer at a gun show in Mobile, AL during Clinton's "Assault" weapons ban. I had to pick the 9mm up from a local FFL and we were discussing the idiocy of the ban and he, a grizzled Vietnam vet, looked me in the eye and said he could wrack up a higher body count with an off-the shelf .22 semi-auto than most AR-15 owners could with their weapons. I had no trouble believing him.
That's why I will never accept red flags or banning weapons by type. It's nothing more than a foot in the door. They fully understand that the vast majority of homicides are by semi-auto handguns and THOSE will be next on the list. It might just be time for citizens to begin creating their own lists. They have forgotten that they serve US, not the other way around. I respect law enforcement officers but any who use the force of an unconstitutional edict are no longer law enforcement. They have chosen the badge and the income over the rights of their fellow Americans.
I'd much rather use my iron sights than a scope
Roll! The most kills are done by people and weapons you've never heard of :)
Wow. Thanks Rambo nutjob.
"My AR-15?"
"Gee i havent seen an AR-15 since my terrible boating accident."
We the People need to stand together with one voice and tell these tyrant wannabees that we have these weapons and we are not giving them up. Hiding only delays the inevitable.
So overplayed.
I traded it for a tank of gasoline
Well my “stupid Trump supporting, white privileged self” foolishly traded mine for a .99cent Trump lawn flag before the “election” so......
Registration...
Confiscation...
Extermination....
That's their plan! We cannot allow it!
Revolt.
I'm a non-gun-owning Californian and found your video enjoyable and informative. And while I don't own any firearms, I am a very staunch supporter of them and the 2nd Amendment!
FOAD RIGHTNOW You don't live in America. Cross the border.
Your a mouth piece tool.. You can not be a supporter and NOT own a firearm, that is mutually exclusive.
Nice try Fed Boi
Cali is nuts
Conservatives need to take CALI back asap
that state is so f ed up it should break off into the pacific any day now starting at the gulf
Not going to happen sadly, it's too late. The time to fight in California was the 80's
This is the reason why you do not allow illegal immigrants to pour in to your state. They ruined California. I left over fifteen years ago because I was so tired of it. I never vote for Democrats and I try to support candidates that support the United States Constitution.
We Republicans don't want California, its been contaminated.
Take back Portland first. Their cops obviously don't want to do anything.
Im glad to live in Florida, grew up in Cuba in Communism for 44 years and I don't have the same reaction when I see places like California, It creates a dangerous precedent for the rest of the country and there is no other word to describe this government officials , Tyrants. Thank you for been there showing the truth.
Oops my swype typing and my keyboard got Loco and it should have said everybody's got an opinion NOT STOPED ONE...
Florida boys for life
Hermanos al rescate! 🇨🇺👍🏼
Reasons to not go live in California:
1) You technically aren't in America anymore
California, NY, same same. The only difference is NY's governor makes more money. Get rid of them all!!! Vote the NRA....
2) WARNING: California contains chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm.
Harley RK The NRA is the one who told politicians we need gun registration.
Harley RK the NRA is doing nothing for you besides taking your money and going on vacation.
SgtBFGunner warning: California contains left wing idiots known to cause the depredation of your civil rights.
Firearm companies should refuse to sell to any California law enforcement/govt agencies and refuse to service any weapons they have.
That’s actually a really good idea. If only the companies cared.
Anti gun laws actually work in the favor of companies though, since they can make even more and charge more from hysteria :/.
Ronnie Barrett did exactly that.
That's a good idea.
Rick Haddix the all mighty $$$$$ speaks volumes sad to say.
How that would be a lawsuit
I used to be anti gun, now I can't wait to buy my first lmao
10/22 or AR.....
I hope you got to it 5 months ago when you said this.
What swayed you from being anti?
Steve T even if he gets one now, good luck finding .223/ 5.56 ammo.
I got a 1000 rounds in March and am ecstatic now lol
@@dustinmikesell7908 same here. I went in on a bulk buy of green tips with a couple buddies in January. There is no substitute for good timing.... that's why I hope he got it 5 months ago, lol.
You forgot about the main reason. “
Shall not be infringed”
And "well regulated"
typeviic1 In the context of the constitution, “well regulated” most likely meant “functioning” or “organized”. Not literally regulated by the government. The founding fathers were very against that.
@@typeviic1 well-regulated described the militia that's necessary to secure the free state, and the period definition is well-prepared
@@typeviic1 NOT TO MENTION the fact that it was talking about a "well regulated militia" not talking about guns in that sentence. basically all that was saying is our militia needs to be strong.
we didn't register our guns in Canada and now our government gave up. it is estimated only 6% of guns in Canada were registered.
very interesting! !
good..
Terrence Wrigley yep this is what I'm going to do !
Terrence Wrigley have the police tried stoping people though to find out if their guns where registered?
understatement of the century.
If a law restricts the rights of the people, you not only have a right NOT to follow it, but you have a moral obligation to stand and fight against it.
I lost all my guns in a tragic boating accident......
i'm so sorry for your loss :[
Yes. ...'tis tragic indeed. 😁
hey so did i lol
***** thats a whole lot of tragic!
daniel boyd cooper lol
We are seriously considering moving out of California. We were born and raised here but now feel overly oppressed. The latest bunch of anti-gun laws are extremely troubling.
I know what you mean. Every state we have considered is just a couple years behind on the anti-gun legislation and the weather stinks. Even Texas seems to be heading down the wrong path. If only we could actually get organized enough to vote out the bad ones from office! And demand change in the media. The collusion is out of control.
I lived in California for 12 years after getting out of the Air Force. Super happy I moved back to Texas!
gone to Carolina in real life
Moving out of CA gives up political power to liberals without a fight. This is WHY CA is liberal. People ran away than fighting. You think it will stop? It will spread until you stop it. The true patriot moves into CA, educates people, helps people be gun owners and reverses the liberal agenda. Same goes to all other "enemy" states, New York, Hawaii, etc.
+Dave Smith I agree in theory Dave. but in practice, truthfully, you will not ever affect the liberal states. it's best to leave them to destroy their states economy, blow up housing costs, lower wages and raise the cost of living, until they are NO longer able to survive. your essentially saying, "this two year old is perfectly capable of reasoned logic." besides that, you will never have the influence Hollywood does. just give it up friend, or exact a tactical retreat to a NC, we would love to have another open carry resident. think about it. you're like Hitler in stalingrad, destined to lose, but how many soldiers to you leave behind? good luck brother.
completely valid points all. I remember that in "Red Dawn"' one of the first things the invading force did was to look in local registration data bases for registered owners of firearms so they could confiscate them and knew where the source of possible resistance would be.
Red Dawn wasn’t a documentary........just sayin’. ; )
@@hookeaires6637 I never stated it was. I think perhaps you missed the point. government wants gun-owners to register their guns so they know where to come to get them and where possible resistance may come from. there is no justifiable reason otherwise to require registration of guns.
@@mischermer88 Their is no data base reffured to in RED DAWN. IF you LISTEN to the LINE (GO TO THE SPORTING GOODS STORE AND GET ALL THE 4473'S
That's kinda how I have confiscation pictured. Turned out it was with the red flag laws
Yep. Just giving a potential enemy intel on us. Not very smart.
Legislators love to make laws about subjects they know nothing about.
Leftist legislators in California love to pass laws that disarm the public. Because if they can get away with it they will. They need a monopoly of force so they can marginalize people with impunity.
You mean abortion in conservative states?
UK police must be getting training from former STASZI now clubs have to hand over data . It's getting like a tyranny ?
They are making us all into "Subjects"
My man!
Just bought a 45 cal 1911 the other day. Took about 30 mins to walk out the door tucked in my waist fully concealed with out a CCWP just filled out the background form.
Regards, Arizona
I don't think "registering any firearms" is covered in the 2nd Amendment.
well back then guns were not automatic and i think the first mass shooting didnt happen until the 40s
@Dennis well the 2nd amendment was written in 1790 and I am talking about how when they wrote the 2nd amendment guns took like what 5 minutes to reload and the first automatic gun kind of like what we have to day wasnt made until the early 1900s
@@FKP_1510 Whatever you say fatty! Is that bacon I smell? Run tubby run!
It's not. But, "a well regulated" (laws) is.
@@typeviic1 well regulated, as in "well regulated militia" means well trained. It doesn't mean controlled by the state.
Any law enforcement watching this video. The citizens, including your family, loved ones and friends, need your help against this tyranny. DON'T ENFORCE THESE STATUTES!
Stand up with your fellow LEOs and uphold the constitution!
8triagrammer LEO won't help, they haven't helped for a long time. they took there oath to uphold the rights of the people and it's constitution and they failed. I have seen LEO stand with the people only long enough till they get there 'LEO exempt' then turn there back on us and walk away. When the day comes for them to repay there betrayal I hope it's a heavy debt.
Stephen Esperson Sorry, but that's not the case. LEOs are just as brainwashed as the masses. It's not like they have secret meetings with LEOs where they explain the truth about everything, and then induct them in to some kind of Skull & Bones-like club.
The majority of them just need to be educated. For example, the right to travel without license or registration is well documented and yet most LEOs know nothing about it, they just assume everyone needs a DL to drive.
If you want to villainize them (as I once did), that's your choice, but I propose that it would be much more efficient to get them on our side, which is what they want. Remember that their family, friends and loved ones are mostly all non LEO citizens...
That is really funny Stephen because lots of officers have lost their jobs defending what they thought was right but somehow I don't remember you supporting them during those times.
Don't pull the edgy teenage "when the revolution comes, then I'll..." Need to cut those corners off your "tuit". LEO do not secure your rights, the people secure their own rights. That is the whole damn point of the 2A. Noncompliance with an illegal law is the only way to fight gu control. Don't be stupid and open about it, but be clever and secretative. I mean, this is common sense people.
If you find yourself blaming officers, military, corporations, banks or whatever for the problems in the government, chances are you fell for the distractions of the liberal's propaganda .
Dave Smith Well said. Not so sure about the liberal vs. conservative thing though - that's just another layer of the divide and conquer strategy that they employ. The real culprits are much higher up, the CFR, IMF, UN, etc.
They own the District of Columbia corporation which owns the USA corp (which replaced the original republic), and the USA corp owns the state which are like subsidiary corps.
Dont worry L.E are the the ones who enforce these bondage laws, when the time comes a lot wont put their life on the line for these zionist overloards who are running the good hard working kind righteous people of the earth, in this hidden bondage and mind control......in the end the THE TRUTH LIKE THE LIGHT SHINES ABOVE ALL !
The constitution superceeds all laws....
No. The constitution is not law. The supreme court interpets the constitution into law. And for that you should be thankful- the constitution simply says you can "bear arms" in an "organized militia". The supreme court ruled that in modern times that you as an individual can own a firearm. Remember that. They could rule the other way if people abuse the right.
Not state law
@@gofuckyourselfyoutube6914 you are wrong. The Constitution is the highest law we have. SCOTUS renders opinions and doesn't make law.
@@gofuckyourselfyoutube6914 ...Come to Texas and try stating that to my boys down there. See what happens...lol
Kirk Mullins it’s true. The constitution is not law per se. it is a guarantee of our God given rights. It guarantees that no government agency can infringe on those rights. But democrats don’t give a flying flip about our rights. Our rights only get in the way of their agenda, which is total control of the population.
Here's the only reason you need: The Government does not need to know what you have or if you have it.
Exactly. Nothing else need be said!
Stock up on 80 percent frames and lowers I mean paper weights yes (paper weights)
machine parts!
I waited too long. Can’t even buy those anymore (New York).
I want some of those glock seat pins from China and I don’t own a glock but if I had the other parts to shoot at home I would buy a glock.
brick by brick. Soon they'll pass a law to make it illegal to have an opinion.
I guarantee you that the only reason there is an option is because they couldn't get it passed without. The antis want disarmament. That is their end goal, make no mistake. The only reason the 1994 Assault Weapon Ban expired is because Feinstein couldn't get a permanent ban passed. And the people of California keep electing that awful woman.......
Feinstein is a liberal fool, if she is jewish I can't believe she would be against the 2nd amendment in any form. does she even believe in the holocaust ? not!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
peter horr She is no fool; she knows exactly what she is doing. She is on a quest for personal gain. Power hungry tyrants like her don't care. The elite will always have whatever it is they are depriving the rest of us.
Didn't Mark Twain say that, " the elite will always have what they won't let you have...? I think so. Feinstein still sucks and will always get what she sais we can't have... a real _unt. the c deleted
since trump won, we 2nd amendment advocates can breathe a short sigh of relief.. but not for long. join the nra and the judicial watch to keep up the fight to keep the constitution and bill of rights.
I was trying to figure out what you meant by register, in Missouri there's no place to go to register a gun. Thank God I live here!
Missouri is a sewer.
@@davidanderson5029 Glad you think so, that way you will never come to this beautiful place you liberal butt plug
So when you buy a gun from a gun shop and they do a background check, you pass and they give it to you. That doesn't mean it's registered does it? I've never really heard of this
@@maruzencentral No absolutely not, in fact that is illegal. The only record of that transaction is kept by the FFL who sold it to you, the only caviot to that is if they go out of biz they must give those 4473 forms ro the BATF, but they are not allowed to put those in a database, they can only make microfiche, hut those are federal laws not Mo. But if you buy a gun from an individual there is no 4473. A background check is not a registration, and that does not even address the made at home guns which have no serial numbers, not only that but the vest thing here is it is constitutional carry which means I don't need a CCW to carry a loaded concealed weapon on my person, in my car, at my campsite, when I shop or eat etc
@@integr8er66 oh nice. I appreciate the info!
Here's the only reason you need. Your forefathers left you the right to own them to preserve your freedom. Registering them, you know is to ultimately confiscate them. You were charged with defending that freedom even if it takes your life.
Never fear foreigners WE ARE the largest armed force in history and WE are waiting with OUR guns in the truck, tanks full and course to Washington D.C. Plotted!
I will not give up my rights. I spent 14 years upholding my constitution, defending the said constitution. "O" and I am legally responsible to do so!!!!!!
I thought you had to
why dont we get back to the comment & just thank this guy for their service in our armed forces. God Bless You. Thank You!
1.I don't have amy assault rifles or and assault weapons.
2.I have not assaulted anyone with anything that could be used as a weapon.
A baseball bat or a 2X4 is an assault weapon if it is used to assault someone, enough said.
You Sir have a fantastic, broadcast quality voice.
To expand just a bit on Reason No. 3: if you register your rifle, you are accountable for it and must be able to produce it upon demand, unless and until you transfer that registration in a manner that is acceptable to the state. And the state doesn't have to make that easy for you to do. If you don't register it, the state only knows that you held an AR-15 (or an object that looks like one) in your hands at some point. If they look at the 4473 where you purchased it, they know that you had it. But they don't know if you still have it, and therefore cannot demand that you produce it. That is a much more important point than it may sound.
Excellent point!
Possum Living I was thinking it was registered when you buy it? I’m in Texas
Michael Arnold, no filling out a 4473 (the form you fill out upon purchasing a firearm) does NOT place the gun in a registry. That involves specifically either registering your firearms serial number to your name either through the manufacturer or your local police department. In theory people do this in the event of their gun being stolen, it can be traced back to them if it is found.
Possum Living,to expand on that,any long gun after 2014 already has the sn on the dros record,so what other list is it going to be on now?they already know
Yes but they will arrest you and let you rot in a county jail indefinitely until you produce the weapon.
Also to remember, FFL have to record what guns & ammo you have bought and may share with state and federal government what you own incase the registration system fails to confiscate your guns (Form 4473)
How about reason number 6.........SCREW THEM! DO NOT COMPLY!
Everyone in CA needs to find volunteers in their area that are out with the gunmageddon petitions and sign them.
www.vetogunmaggeddon.org/petition locator
Everyone with a gun in California just needs to perform citizens arrests on CHP, the local police precincts that enforce these laws, the elected officials of each city, and the CA DoJ and force new elections. Bring firearms for protection, ROE is to not fire until fired upon. The people of this nation are the militia that was made to stand against a tyrannical gov't, it is time for those that reside in CA, NY, NH, etc to take back their states.
Boy oh boy! Eventhough I don't feel like taking the time to build any ARs from scratch, I'm thinking maybe I should get some 80% lowers and the jig/end mills just to have, while they're still legal... surprisingly!
so glad I live in Texas now! I feel for you guys and totally agree with your reasons
In austin, ppl hate guns because of all the californian liberals who live here
I'm never registering _any_ firearms, and I _will_ own as many as I want, where I want, and how I want. Problem?
See; Second Amendment in the Constitution of this United States of America.
The second amendment is just words on paper, they’re right about that. Where they’re wrong is that said words on paper give us rights. Wrong, they merely spell out what rights we already have. Rights don’t come from government. The amendment is only a declaration of an existing right. 2nd amendment or not, our rights are permanent and inalienable, they come from our creator and from our nature, not from politicians, not from laws, not from words on paper.
Why are we giving into these laws that go against the constituiton
Can't take it anywhere and nobody has the cash to take it all the way to the supreme court, most likely while sitting in jail.
Couldn't pay me to live in that state
gemmint77 don't lie you would with a price
Exactly along with other guns never registered any of mine
Thought about registering my gun, then I realized it’d be easier for them to track me when they try to take them
So you just bought the block & made your own lower
Clint Christman I cant give out too much info online... man are you an atf agent?
Haha u Know it... meant bought the upper* anyways but thx thx .. I'll see you soon 😂🤔
#6: it’s none of their dang business
🦅💜🇺🇸
Reasons based on Australian experience:
#1 When they introduce bans, government knows that you have it and will come hunting for it. Registration in the majority of Australian States was a prerequisite for the semi-automatic rifle ban introduced in 1996. Without registration, this ban would have been a complete failure and would have eventually been revoked.
#2 Registries are virtual shopping lists for bent Police and Criminals. The introduction of registration in NSW as part of the 1996 laws saw a number of firearm collections stolen, this was not something that had not previously occurred.
I wish I could read the rest of the comment.
When you buy a weapon from a dealer the gov knows you have it anyway.
wrong!
Not exactly. The records are available to LE at your local FFL, but they have to go there requesting information on the particular weapon by serial number. When your FFL goes out of business, they have to ship their records for storage at BATF. Again, nothing from your purchase from a FFL is in a database.
@@lances4803 So neither a gunshop or big box store keep those particular records together (serial # and name associated with it?) What about the 4473? I've always been told the atf can just go into those establishments and take those records therefore knowing everything you have. Reason why they changed the form to have your info on the first page now. 'm genuinely asking.
@@InAltum. All active FFLs keep the 4473s in their records for the duration they are in business (or at least 20 years). Of course that form contains everything about the sale, but they are the property of the FFL until sent to ATF. ATF has two functions, compliance inspections and LE. Compliance can do one warrantless inspection a year, and generally LE is not involved. They can take records with them if they are voluminous, but not usually, and always with consent of the FFL. (Gets them out of the shop quicker.)
@@lances4803 Makes more sense. Thanks for the info.
It's so funny how ergonomics and a flash hider are illegal.
Aaron Grant Yep, completely. Making people have an awkward grip on a gun actually reduces firearm safety.
It's obviously about confiscating all firearms.
ItsAllAboutGuitar Yep!
and no flash hider causes muzzle flash which can be a fire hazard. Featureless rifles are unsafe
A fire hazard? Really bro, that's what you are worried about? Don't sit in a pile of dry weeds then.
Ya, sadly I live in California. It's so sad our government is so lame.
100% agree. I went a slightly different route, mine is a fixed magazine with the evil features, so it’s not an assault rifle. Coming soon to CA and a bunch of other states, AW bans will be unconstitutional along with the gun roster of what is an OK gun to purchase in CA.
lol we have barely any laws here in texas, I enjoy my ar15 with my 60 round drum, with no bullet button and my flash hider with collapsable stock!
in terms of NFA weapons, Virginia is about 10 places above Texas. Yes i'm saying that with NFA weapons, we're more heavily armed. However guns overall, those numbers are impossible to pin down due to lack of a registry. I'm glad those numbers can't be pinned down.
how many criminals have a featureless rifle lol
Gun control laws are not for criminals. They are just for law abiding citizens.
tons and it can't be stopped
That's a non issue, They KNOW criminals won't comply, what they want is for YOU to be a criminal so they can lock up up with all the other "undesirable" people in their life.
seriously. All these laws do is opress the citizens of this country, they are the only ones who obey these digesting laws. I would never move to commifornia.
Dexter Honeycutt
Brutal fact right there.
Great video. Letting people know not to be scared to NOT register your semi-auto weapon.
This video is... 😊 I love watching it from time to time, to remind myself that there are still decent, sane people in California. And they deserve our support. Be safe.
When Deerfield Illinois happened, i lost all of my guns in a canoe paddling competition. You can imagine my embarrassment.
Registration of any weapons, 100% of the time results in confiscation.
Don't forget to sign the petitions for Veto Gunmageddon if you're in California!
Isn't the petition just another list that gun owners voluntarily signed and submitted? There is no law (I don't believe) that says the government can't just knock on every gun owner's door based on one or a combination of firearms related lists such as, a non-specific transaction record list, a background check list, the registered "assault weapons" list, pro-gun petitions, tweets, forums posts, credit card purchases, Google searches, Letter or emails to your local politician or even, RUclips Comments. They have the means and will use their power. Every restriction or new law also comes with a nice new fee or tax. I believe they will add a ridiculous "Gun & Ammo Safety" tax next. In California, we already have little choice available to us because of the Approved Guns List but the economy needs still needs our contributions so expect a Special Tax first. They will empty our wallets before they take away our guns. But of course I could be wrong. I wish I could move and take our weather
Believe it or not, as someone who has done investigative work, those people who are charged with using registration databases (I used one of these in an entirely different area, and industry) do try to not waste time, with "FALSE POSITIVE" hits on their lists. A list of signatories to a petition will include enough false positives (non-gun owners), that it would not be nearly as good as this registration database they are seeking to build. What investigators normally do is develop a planning and implementation regime which uses the lists to build "red flag" lists (special filtered out lists where there appears to be a FULL JOIN of say, lists of FELONS, and lists of Ammo purchasers, or Lists of Assault Weapon registrants). This would be a group that could be investigated. It would be far smaller than the list of all registrants in either of the two lists. It's still a valid goal for someone who prizes 2nd A, to simply want to do what it takes to stay out of lists generally.
Besides, the main occupation for many of these government folk will be building and testing the database registry. If history is any indication, this may well have design and development problems galore, as they build it. My understanding also, is that the existing registry (mostly manual, probably with some additional IT resources) used in cities like Los Angeles, CA allows police to scour for Felons who appear to be purchasing ammunition from gun stores. This is an example of the kind of "targeted" investigative efforts I mention above, that will likely occur more NEAR TERM from these actions. Of course this is guessing.
All that being said, the laws appear crafted to so narrowly define particular platforms, that these fairly innocuous changes (e.g. a rifle with no flash hider, and with say, a Thordsen Customs buttstock; which is a fixed stock, which takes the spot of the pistol grip, removing two of the elements of the definition) that it seems the path of least resistance, and least registration, or database inclusion is via "featureless".
I have seen people on video at a range in Louisiana shooting the featureless. These persons appear to have reasonable amount of experience, and they claim on the video that the set up, while not quite as fine as the normal one, is not obnoxious, uncomfortable or difficult to manage.
Right. Like I was saying, I had every single stockbroker in the U.S., their entire academic and judicial record, their date of submission of fingerprinting, essentially EVERYTHING about the more than 500,000 (back then) brokers. This system was called the Central Registration Depository (CRD). This was very useful, but we did not have direct access to develop SQL queries against the database. That sort of thing was done in the regulator's IT shop. It was possible to obtain rosters for any brokerage firm we, as examiners were about to visit to conduct examinations. For particularly suspect ones, I'd get the roster in advance, and simply review the CRD info for everyone. This did not take that long, but it was essentially an individual mainframe query of each person by CRD number. Now, it's possible that today, there is some better front end query tool for FINRA examiners to obtain bulk data on each RR at a brokerage firm.
Merely having the list, or knowing a data stockpile exists is not the same as being able to develop a query against the list, or compare one database system to another. That requires software development. I do that now, and can attest that it's not trivial. What we believe MAY be happening, can certainly happen, but, also it's somewhat of a software development problem to actually have government doing it. Once some dictator comes to power, like an Erdogan is in Turkey (I see in the news, he is eliminating his political opposition), then those developer resources are quickly deployed to create lists, using every tool possible.
Oh boy, then those founding fathers were idiots for putting their names on the declaration of Independence...
If you can't even sign and vote, you mind as well just eat your gun. You are a waste of space. And don't give me the bull about fighting during the "revolution". If you can't fight today, then you will never fight for the future.
+Dave Smith really? how does that work?
Buy a 80% bottom receiver and Finnish it and just buy a upper receiver and build one
David Barnes I have 8 that I milled. Only way to go
Hope you guy's are using aliases. Lol.
@@gcorpus5558 a smart person uses different alias's tbh
I haven't heard anyone talk about in CA how law enforcement personnel are exempt from the CA gun roster, they can easily buy and register off roster handguns. Also, law enforcement are exempt from the over 10 round magazine capacity ban. I totally understand that law enforcement will have access to certain firearms and magazines that civilians may not for purposes of performing their duties, however, how does that extend also to their personal weapons that they own outside of work? That whole concept that "Well I can have it but you can't" is a big problem for me.
The main reason i only possess semi-auto weapons and not go for the full-auto tag, is to keep ATF out of my biz! Full-auto is over-rated and not necessary in the civilian world. When i was in the U.S.Army, we rarely went full-auto in order to save ammo and have better accuracy.
Reason 6 constitution says I can have it so bring your ammo and body armor when you come to take mine
I don't live near water, so I didn't lose mine in a boating accident.
But my dogs ate mine with my homework.
Hell's teeth guys, your gun laws are almost worse than ours in NZ..... Does it not occur to anyone that the places with least crime involving firearms in your country are those with the FEWEST gun laws?
Oh by the way, firearms crime is at an all time high in Australia, as are 'mass shootings' (involving three or more victims) in spite of what many may want you to believe....
Thanks for the info. Clinton want's us to think otherwise.
It's Nov 9th, GOOD NEWS!
Kathryn Truscott Yes, it that thought does occur to those of us with common sense, something politicans and liberals don't seem to have. They think all they have to do is pass a law against something and poof, it stops happening.
Some of us liberals like the guns. Not very many of us, I have to admit. I doubt any of us were Clinton fans. Uck on both those candidates though. I just think the ladies should be able to get abortions and similar monstrous things.
You forgot to mention that we (New Zealanders) did have to hand our rifles in back in the early 90's and our crime rate for home intrusion crimes such as rape, murder etc became the worse in a Western Civilization.......Then the Government let us have our guns back annnnnd also allowed us to have AR15's. And AK47's and more and guess what.......Yup......Crime has dropped to one of the lowest in a Western Civilization.
One word . . . Arizona! ;)
USA#1 !! Yeah Tucson is the armpit of Arizona. The Phoenix area is wayyyyy better and super gun friendly
Home means Nevada ;)
4 years later and still a great video!!
What AR15? All my guns were lost in an unfortunate boating accident. Dang
There is absolutely not one thing that could compel me to live in California. Virtually everything that is wrong in American society has a representation in this state. Unless a state has not only acceptable gun laws ( NRA acceptability, shall issue concealed carry, take possession of firearms purchased immediately at the time of purchase with a CCW, etc ) then there would be absolutely no likelihood of me ever living there. The same would be true in most northeastern states from DC to New Hampshire. Not interested in living in ANY Democratically controlled state nor city either.
Your health care and quality of education will continue to suffer.
@@Rhythmicons very true. Living in a Democratic controlled state is not a good thing.
Yeah, red states are notable for their poverty, obesity, and lack of education.@@lorenreece1665
Especially relevant now, anywhere in the USA!
I couldn't handle California and its anti freedom agenda anymore so I moved to a free state!
way to go matt. I did the same thing in the early 1990s. when cal. started going commie, I left too. cali was great in the 80s no problem for any guns. then came Stockton and everything changed. so I moved to Arizona too... now I live in florida which is very gun friendly also. in the current issue of guns and ammo there is a 50 state ranking of best to worst for guns. Arizona is #1 gun friendliest and DC NY and cali are the 50th....worst for gun owners. not surprising.
Just moved to Oregon last week!
i thought oregon was as bad as cali? full of green liberal tree huggers and bernie millenials. i used to live in roseburg about 30 years ago and it was like that then???
I'm working on doing the same.
what wrong with loving trees? Teddy Roosevelt said the greatest conservationist should be hunters, I love to hunt and I can see the wildlife struggling because society is encroaching on pristine lands.
Build your own with an 80% lower... enough said..
I will never register ANY of my firearms! A few years ago Connecticut, after Sandy Hook, passed a law requiring owners of semi-autos to register them with the state! I saw pictures of CN gun owners standing in line to comply! I wanted to puke! No one of those gun owners can be depended upon stand up for their rights. I would rather become an "outlaw" than a compliant subject!
Ron Fillmore how do you buy a lower without registering it ?
In Soviet\Russia . [AR`15 . Registers You]
Lol. I always imagined Soviet Russia more of an AK place.
Dont' ask don't tell. What they don't know won't hurt me.
They will also know that you have it from the background check used for that particular firearm.
There is one reason for registration and that is eventual confiscation.
If you buy a gun at a retail store it's registered.
Registering a semi automatic rifle with 'evil features' (see CA assault rifle features) as a R.A.W. is different from registering a compliant semi auto rifle.
One huge issue is that when you buy one, it's registered before you can ever take it home . But it's not registered as an Assault Weapon .
I appreciate the video and sharing your viewpoint. I just felt like that needed some clarification.
Although this video is 6 yrs old, so maybe everyone understands by now, anyhow.
I live in California and I found the sweetest spot to hide my guns inside my Prius. Utopia!
A trained dog can find your secret spot.
But an AR?
Why WOULD you register it/them? Come and take it/them.
A
Here in Queensland Australia we are required to register all firearms, including paintball guns and gel blasters. We are subjected to regular firearms checks and safe storage compliance checks.
DONT EVER REGISTER YOUR AR15......
Lower receivers are the regulated part of the rifle since that's what they call the firearm. The upper receiver is classified as an accessory
Mitsubishi 3000GT TwinTurbo not if you buy it in a private sale
Build a 80% lower. No ser#, totally legal. Not sure if they are egalitarian in Cali, though
Mitsubishi 3000GT TwinTurbo not true
@@shadetreelife3670 you can have them delivered to your door in CA, but if you want to machine it, you're supposed to contact the CA DOJ(Department of Justice) and get it serialized beforehand.
I have never worried about gun control, I can hit what I aim at!
However, the government's attempt at controlling the citizens does worry me; registration is merely step one of confiscation!
They have been steadily stepping up the control measures,.and would like to get more control. Tennessee, Oklahoma, Nevada, and many other states , especially ones on main interstate thoroughfares, now employ whats called viper teams. They stop you and search and seize what ever they find ,..They can even swipe you C. Card info and they can seize that too,... the future of this country worries me too,.. we must stay vigilant and cover our neighbors 6 ,..
You should worry! First they go after "assault rifles" then they go after "assault shotguns" then "sniper weapons" And they would consider a pump action shotgun and a bolt action rifle as war weapons. Do not allow ANYONE to lose their rights.
Ajacklee4 - Sorry you missed the inference in my comments. I was pointing out the difference between gun control and citizen control. I don't believe taking away the citizen's rights is as much gun control as citizen's rights control. And yes I agree that we should be extremely vigilant on gun rights' losses because once lost, I doubt they'll be restored without much more legal fighting to restore rights which shouldn't have been taken away in the first place.
The ONLY reason that counts...the right of the people to KEEP and BEAR arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. No other discussion needed.
All my guns were stolen just last week !
I just haven't had time to report it !
Maybe I'll get lucky next week and find them when the crook returns them because of his guilty conscience !
If the NRA is so committed to my 2A rights, then where have they been when all those anti-2A laws coast to coast are being passed?
U.S. Supreme Court ruled over 10 years ago that there is no legal term 'assault rifle' (an automatic military rifle used in war) for a semi automatic civilian rifle. That, that is an action. So if one gets in trouble in Federal Court for a fire arm, the prosecuting Attorney slips up and calls it an 'assault rifle' one can legally use that term against them and void the charges. A good attorney knows this, and how to do this. Mine is officially a Defense Procurement Manufacturing Service by legal name. But of course, laws are not laws in the United States. So the Plutocracy can do as they please and make it up as they go.
I am so glad I moved out of California before I started buying guns. Those people have lost their minds.
when you purchase an ar or any gun it goes to a register. it's wrong but everything else they do is wrong.
As soon as you buy a lower the ATF gets the serial number, so they now you have a rifle. You change anything on the rifle (butstock) it then becomes other /another type of weapon.
You notice that they don’t do a background check until after you’ve picked out a gun?
What AR15?
The most important thing to take from this Vid is ... you'll be agreeing with the State, that ur AR 15 is Indeed an assault rifle...now they are in complete control ! Do not register ANY of your firearms !! Not ever !! Great vids Sir...keep them up.
Everyone should register -after- all the criminals have registered... then its “fair”.
I have a different suggestion. Don’t live in California.
To buy a gun you have to give all the guns intel with the background check.
That is registered.
i am very confused by this "registering" stuff??? what country do you live in? I am in USA. We do not register things
I seem to be missing something here. I'm under the impression when you buy a firearm in California, the FFL seller is required to complete and submit the registration paper work as part of the sale. If this is true, how do you avoid registration ?
Tim Campbell the paper work when you buy a gun is not a registration. But if you gun shows up at a crime scene the serial numbers and manufacturer can say which wholesaler got that firearm then they can point to the retailer then to you. But some states want to lord over its people. There is no official federal registration but ...........
Yes I’m confused as well
Yes but you can buy an 80% lower kit online no reg no and the buy a block lower online as well, that just needs trigger slot milled out , safety couple other places with jig Saw,. Then it's good to go
Rite?
There is a vice segment on what happens with your paperwork after you purchase
Video tip: Face away from the sun. Purchase a large white screen bounce screen. You can get them at Samy's in L.A. They lighten up your face with a reflective screen.
The moment you register an "assault " weapon you become a register assaulter.
Registered or not, their gonna have to take my life before they get my gun🤷
Soon as you get on their list as a gun owner.when you get pulled over or they come to your house for some reason.They are coming with a bad attitude.